DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR41 January 2007 Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan James C. Schneider, Richard P. O’Neal and Richard D. Clark, Jr. Walleye Sander vitreus Sauger Sander canadensis Yellow Perch Perca flavescens www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 41 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 41 January 2007 Ecology, Management, and Status of Walleye, Sauger, and Yellow Perch in Michigan James C. Schneider, Richard P. O’Neal, and Richard D. Clark, Jr. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: HUMAN RESOURCES Or MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Or OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CADILLAC PLACE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PO BOX 30028 3054 W. GRAND BLVD., SUITE 3-600 4040 NORTH FAIRFAX DRIVE LANSING MI 48909-7528 DETROIT MI 48202 ARLINGTON VA 22203 For information or assistance on this publication, contact the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Fisheries Division, PO BOX 30446, LANSING, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. TTY/TDD: 711 (Michigan Relay Center) This information is available in alternative formats. ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources R E A S P E DNR D Total number of copies printed 60 — Total cost $366.14 — Cost per copy $6.10 M ICHIGAN Suggested Citation Format Schneider, J. C., R. P. O’Neal, and R. D. Clark, Jr. 2007. Ecology, management, and status of walleye, sauger, and yellow perch in Michigan. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 41, Ann Arbor. ii Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Ecology ................................................................................................................................... 1 Walleye ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Sauger................................................................................................................................................. 4 Yellow Perch ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Management in Michigan........................................................................................................ 7 General Goals and Practices.............................................................................................................. 7 Management Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 7 Walleye............................................................................................................................................ 8 Sauger............................................................................................................................................. 9 Yellow Perch ................................................................................................................................... 9 Fishing Regulations .......................................................................................................................... 10 Walleye.......................................................................................................................................... 10 Yellow Perch ................................................................................................................................. 11 Habitat Protection ............................................................................................................................. 12 Stocking ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Genetics............................................................................................................................................ 13 Status in Michigan................................................................................................................. 13 Lake Superior Basin.......................................................................................................................... 15 Walleye.......................................................................................................................................... 15 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 15 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 16 Yellow Perch ................................................................................................................................. 17 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 17 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 17 Lake Michigan Basin......................................................................................................................... 18 Walleye.......................................................................................................................................... 18 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 18 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 21 Yellow Perch ................................................................................................................................. 22 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 22 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 23 Lake Huron Basin ............................................................................................................................. 23 Walleye.......................................................................................................................................... 23 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 23 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 25 Yellow Perch ................................................................................................................................. 25 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 25 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 26 Lake Erie Basin................................................................................................................................. 27 Walleye.......................................................................................................................................... 27 Distribution................................................................................................................................. 27 Special concerns ....................................................................................................................... 28 Yellow Perch ................................................................................................................................. 28 Distribution................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fighting the Lone Wolf Mentality: Twenty-First Century Reflections on the Paradoxical State of American Indian Law
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 38 Issue 1 Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock: One Hundred Years Later Fall 2002 Fighting the Lone Wolf Mentality: Twenty-First Century Reflections on the Paradoxical State of American Indian Law Bryan H. Wildenthal Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bryan H. Wildenthal, Fighting the Lone Wolf Mentality: Twenty-First Century Reflections on the arP adoxical State of American Indian Law, 38 Tulsa L. Rev. 113 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol38/iss1/22 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wildenthal: Fighting the Lone Wolf Mentality: Twenty-First Century Reflection FIGHTING THE LONE WOLF MENTALITY: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY REFLECTIONS ON THE PARADOXICAL STATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN LAW@ Bryan H. Wildenthal* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. 1999: THREE CASES, THREE COURTS, THREE SOVEREIGNS ............. 113 II. THE LONE W OLF M ENTALITY .............................................................. 118 III. THE H UNTING OF LONE W OLF ............................................................. 123 IV. THE LONE WOLF MENTALITY RISES AGAIN: THE REHNOUIST ERA OF AMERICAN INDIAN LAW ........................... 124 V. 2001: Two CASES, ONE COURT, NO JUSTICE ...................................... 135 VI. WHERE Do WE GO FROM HERE? ........................ ........................... .. .. 144 I. 1999: THREE CASES, THREE COURTS, THREE SOVEREIGNS In 1999, as the turn of the twenty-first century loomed, I planned to write a reflective essay on the state of American Indian law, a field in which I have been privileged to teach (but mostly, learn) since 1996.' I thought I would use as my © 2002 Bryan H.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Guide to Native American Communities in Wisconsin
    Official Guide to Native American Communities in Wisconsin www.NativeWisconsin.com Shekoli (Hello), elcome to Native Wisconsin! We are pleased to once again provide you with our much anticipated NATIVE WISCONSIN MAGAZINE! WAs always, you will find key information regarding the 11 sovereign tribes in the great State of Wisconsin. From history and culture to current events and new amenities, Native Wisconsin is the unique experience visitors are always looking for. As our tribal communities across WI continue to expand and improve, we want to keep you informed on what’s going on and what’s in store for the future. With a new vision in place, we plan to assist each and every beautiful reservation to both improve what is there, and to create new ideas to work toward. Beyond their current amenities, which continue to expand, we must diversify tribal tourism and provide new things to see, smell, touch, taste, and hear. Festivals, culinary arts, song and dance, storytelling, Lacrosse, new tribal visitor centers, even a true hands on Native Wisconsin experience! These are just a few of the elements we want to provide to not only give current visitors what they’ve been waiting for, but to entice new visitors to come see us. We are always looking to our visitors for input, so please let us know how you would like to experience NATIVE WISCONSIN in the future, and we will make it happen for you. We are looking forward to 2015 and beyond. With the return of this magazine, a new website, our annual conference in Mole Lake, and a new online TV show in development, things are getting exciting for all of us.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Michigan Family Fish Consumption Guide Important Facts to Know If You Eat Michigan Fish
    2008 MICHIGAN FAMILY FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDE Important facts to know if you eat Michigan fish MDCH Division of Environmental Health• 1-800-648-6942 Visit us on the web at www.michigan.gov/mdch-toxic, click on Michigan Fish Advisory TABLE OF CONTENTS HEALTH BENEFITS AND 1 Health Benefits & RISKS OF EATING FISH Risks 2 Get the Benefits HEALTH BENEFITS OF EatING FISH & Avoid the Risks ish are a great low-fat source of protein, vitamins and miner- 3 5 Simple Tips als. The omega-3 oils found in fish are important for the healthy Fbrain development of babies during pregnancy, breast-fed babies Cooking & and children. Eating fish can also reduce the risk of heart disease in 4 adults. The American Heart Association recommends that adults eat Cleaning Fish fish two times a week. 5 Mercury Advisory Health Risks of Eating Fish 6 How to use the Guide MDCH advises women of childbearing age Many chemicals end up in lakes, rivers, and children under oceans and in some of the fish we eat. 15 years old to be extra Eating polluted fish won't make you sick careful before eating right away. But the chemicals found in fish certain types of fish in can build up in your body and make you Michigan. very sick later on. Some of these Contact the Michigan Department of chemicals can harm your immune system, Community Health reproductive system, brain functions, or increase your risk of cancer. 1-800-648-6942 Children and babies that get too much of these chemicals may develop or www.michigan.gov/mdch-toxic, physical, mental or behavioral problems that they would not have had then click on Michigan Fish Advisory otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A STATE OF MICHIGAN S P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR48 December 2008 The Fish Community and Fishery of South Manistique Lake, Mackinac County, Michigan in 2003–04 with Emphasis on Walleyes, Northern Pike, and Smallmouth Bass Patrick A. Hanchin and Darren R. Kramer North Manistique Fox River East Branch Fox River Lake Locke Creek Helmer Creek Fork Lake Manistique River Upper Black Creek Big Manistique Lake Black Creek Flooding 0 1 2 Portage Creek Miles Shoepac Lake Strom Creek South Manistique Lake Norton Creek Taylor Creek www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 48 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 48 December 2008 The Fish Community and Fishery of South Manistique Lake, Mackinac County, Michigan in 2003-04 with Emphasis on Walleyes, Northern Pike, and Smallmouth Bass Patrick A. Hanchin, and Darren R. Kramer MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Chain of Lakes Water Trail Plan
    Chain of Lakes Water Trail Plan This water trail plan was approved by the Paddle Antrim Board of Directors on December 15, 2016. It was last updated January 19, 2017. Board of Directors Matthew Drake, President Mark Irwin, Vice President Patti Savant, Treasurer Mary Faculak, Secretary Megan Olds, Director At Large Tom Shelder, Director At Large Melissa Zelenak, Director At Large Staff Deana Jerdee, Executive Director Acknowledgements Paddle Antrim wants to especially thank Megan Olds (Parallel Solutions) and Deana Jerdee for their significant contributions in writing the plan. We also want to thank Elk Rapids Chain of Lakes Watershed Plan Implementation Team (ERCOL-WPIT), Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy, Land Information Access Association, and Tipp of the Mitt Watershed Council for their contributions to the development of this plan. Paddle Antrim also thanks the jurisdictions who have approved sites for inclusion on the Chain of Lakes Water Trail: Antrim County, Banks Township, Village of Bellaire, Clearwater Township, Central Lake Township, Village of Central Lake, Village of Elk Rapids, Village of Ellsworth, Forest Home Township, Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy, Grass River Natural Area, Inc., Helena Township, Kearney Township, Little Traverse Conservancy, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, and Milton Township. Paddle Antrim also wants to thank Art Zelenak (cover photo and Grass River), and Emily Sullivan/Shorts Brewing Company (Ellsworth River Park) for use of their photos. Chain of Lakes Water Trail Plan 1 01/2017 Introduction A water trail is a designated route along a river, lake, canal or bay designed for people using small, non-motorized watercraft like kayaks and canoes.
    [Show full text]
  • CORA Code – Great Lakes Fishing Regulations
    CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN Adopted August 31, 2000 Effective September 7, 2000 Revised March 4, 2019 CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN CONTENTS PART ONE: GENERAL MATTERS PART FIVE: NON-COMMERCIAL FISHING I. Purpose……………………………………1 XVII. Recreational Fishing……………………….…28 II. Scope and Application……………………1 XVIII. Tribal Charter Boat Operations………………28 III. Definitions……………………………...1-4 XIX. Subsistence Fishing……………………….28-30 PART TWO: ZONES PART SIX: LICENSES AND INFORMATION IV. Commercial Fishing Zones………………4 XX. License and Registration Definitions and Regulations…………………………………...30 V. Tribal Zones………………………........4-8 XXI. License Regulations……………………....31-32 VI. Intertribal Zones………………………8-10 XXII. Harvest Reporting and Sampling………....32-34 VII. Trap Net Zones…………………........10-12 XXIII. Assessment Fishing……………………… 34-35 VIII. Closed or Limited Fishing Zones……12-14 PART THREE: GEAR PART SEVEN: REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT IX. Gear Restrictions……….…………......14-17 XXIV. Tribal Regulations……………………………35 X. State-Funded Trap Net Conversion Operations……………………………17-18 XXV. Orders of the Director…………………..........35 XXVI. Jurisdiction and Enforcement…………….35-37 PART FOUR: SPECIES XXVII. Criminal Provisions………………………….37 XI. Lake Trout…………………………...18-19 XII. Salmon……………………………….19-21 PART EIGHT: ACCESS XIII. Walleye…………………………….…21-23 XXVIII. Use of Access Sites……………………..37-38 XIV. Yellow Perch………………………...23-26 XV. Other Species………………………...26-27 XVI. Prohibited Species……………………… 27 CHIPPEWA OTTAWA RESOURCE AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL, SUBSISTENCE, AND RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE 1836 TREATY CEDED WATERS OF LAKES SUPERIOR, HURON, AND MICHIGAN PART ONE: GENERAL MATTERS SECTION I.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Fishery Resource Report, Lake Missaukee, 2018-261
    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources 2018-261 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Lake Missaukee Missaukee County Muskegon River Watershed, last surveyed 2018 Mark A. Tonello, Fisheries Management Biologist Environment Lake Missaukee is an 1,880-acre natural lake located in Lake Township in western Missaukee County, Michigan. Lake City sits on the eastern shore of Lake Missaukee. Lake Missaukee is the largest lake in Missaukee County and has a maximum depth of approximately 27 feet, although most of the lake is less than 15 feet. Substrates found in the lake are mostly sand, with silty sand and detritus in some of the deeper areas and in some weedy shoreline areas. Because it is a relatively shallow lake, Lake Missaukee has an abundance of aquatic vegetation. The shoreline of Lake Missaukee is highly developed with many homes surrounding the lake, with only the northwestern shoreline being undeveloped. The north end of the lake features several shallow bays and several islands. The larger island is connected to the mainland by a bridge and is heavily developed, with over 40 homes on it. The landscape surrounding Lake Missaukee is diverse. Immediately east of the lake lies Lake City, but beyond that the landscape is primarily agricultural. To the south is much the same. To the north and west there are several lakes, of which Crooked and Sapphire are the largest. Wetlands are common to the north and west and upland areas are forested with conifers and northern hardwoods. Most of the lands surrounding the lake are in private ownership. Lake Missaukee is part of the Muskegon River watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Antrim County Operator of Dams P.O
    Antrim County Operator of Dams P.O. Box 217, Bellaire, MI 49615 Mr. Ed Boetcher Chair, Antrim County Board of Commissioners Bellaire, Michigan March 6, 2019 Dear Commissioner Boetcher, Please accept the following Annual Report of the Drain Commissioner and Operator of Dams for 2018. Annual Report of the Antrim County Operator of Dams for 2018 a) Elk Rapids Hydroelectric Facility The County share of electrical generation revenues in 2018 was $19,357 (10% of total sales of $193,357), a slight decrease from $21,138 in 2017, due to less annual precipitation that results in a lower total volume of water flowing through the dam over the course of the year. Interestingly, the highest rate of generation at the Hydro since the Stockhausens began operating the dam in 2007 occurred in the spring of 2017. However, a couple of months later in July, the flow had dropped so dramatically that they had to shut down the generators for several days in order to maintain the court ordered lake level on Elk Lake—also the first time that happened since 2007. So, we experienced extremes of high flow and low flow in the same year—a direct result of the extremes we are currently experiencing in our weather. Following the 2017 renovation of the interior, in early spring of 2018 the County replaced all the exterior glass of the hydro building. The project cost about $10,000 and dramatically improved the quality of natural lighting inside the structure. Much of the old caulking was severely compromised and panes were leaking water during rainstorms, and many of the panes were actually old Plexiglas and severely discolored.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk-Skegemog Lakes Profile
    2011 Report What would Michigan be without water ? One might to protect lakes throughout Northern Michigan. Projects as well ask what the Sahara would be without sand or the carried out on these lakes have ranged from lake-wide Himalayas without mountains. Michigan is defined by water aquatic plant surveys to individual shoreline property and, in fact, the definition of Michigan in some Native restoration projects. Details about recent projects involving American languages literally means water, “big lake” to Elk and Skegemog Lakes are included in this report. be precise. We hope you find the information presented in this report Water formed Michigan, frozen water that is, thousands of both interesting and insightful. If you have any questions, feet thick. A series of glaciers advanced and retreated comments, or concerns, please contact Tip of the Mitt across Michigan over the course of millions of years, creating Watershed Council at (231) 347-1181 or visit our website at the present-day landscape of rolling hills and broad plains; www.watershedcouncil.org. dotted with lakes, crisscrossed with rivers, and surrounded by freshwater seas. Glacial scouring and huge ice chunks that were left behind formed thousands of lakes across the landscape, lakes of all shapes and sizes, each unique: each beautiful and special in its own way. Many people live in or travel through Northern Michigan because of these lakes and the characte r they lend to the region. Elk and Skegemog Lakes are among the most picturesque lakes in Michigan, true aquatic treasures that are experienced and enjoyed by thousands upon thousands of people every year; year after year and generation after generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
    Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Michigan's Great Lakes Islands
    FILE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Biodiversity of Michigan’s Great Lakes Islands Knowledge, Threats and Protection Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist April 5, 1993 Report for: Land and Water Management Division (CZM Contract 14C-309-3) Prepared by: Michigan Natural Features Inventory Stevens T. Mason Building P.O. Box 30028 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 3734552 1993-10 F A report of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. 309-3 BIODWERSITY OF MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS Knowledge, Threats and Protection by Judith D. Soule Conservation Research Biologist Prepared by Michigan Natural Features Inventory Fifth floor, Mason Building P.O. Box 30023 Lansing, Michigan 48909 April 5, 1993 for Michigan Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Management Division Coastal Zone Management Program Contract # 14C-309-3 CL] = CD C] t2 CL] C] CL] CD = C = CZJ C] C] C] C] C] C] .TABLE Of CONThNTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORY AND PHYSICAL RESOURCES 4 Geology and post-glacial history 4 Size, isolation, and climate 6 Human history 7 BIODWERSITY OF THE ISLANDS 8 Rare animals 8 Waterfowl values 8 Other birds and fish 9 Unique plants 10 Shoreline natural communities 10 Threatened, endangered, and exemplary natural features 10 OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH ON MICHIGAN’S GREAT LAKES ISLANDS 13 Island research values 13 Examples of biological research on islands 13 Moose 13 Wolves 14 Deer 14 Colonial nesting waterbirds 14 Island biogeography studies 15 Predator-prey
    [Show full text]