Roman Legionary Horsemen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roman Legionary Horsemen Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Reprinted from the American Society of Arms Collectors Bulletin 60:38-44 Additional articles available at http://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/resources/articles/ The Legionary Horsemen: Arms, Armor and Tactical Role of the Equites Legionis and Equites Promoti Michael F. Pavkovie Introduction The Roman military establishment of the high empire was composed of four different categories of units. The first category was the so-called militia urbana, the units station- ed in and around the city of Rome; included in this group were the members of the imperial guard. The most famous troops of the imperial household were the Praetorians who formed the infantry component of the guard? The mounted portion was furnished by the horseguards of the emperor, the equites singulares Augusti, who were drawn from the auxiliary cavalrymen on the frontier and were charged with the protection of the emperor's persom2 The second category of troops formed the mainstay of the Roman ar- my: the legions.3 These were units of Roman citizens approx- imately 5000 strong, mostly infantrymen but including a small contingent of cavalrymen, usually 120 men under the high empire, but later substantially increased up to at least 726. The legions were deployed along the frontiers and pro- A vast amount of academic ink has been spilled on vided Roman generals with the close order infantry who various topics concerning the legions such as their officers, formed the line of battle. organization, recruitment, and the histories of individual The third group of units were those of auxiliaries.*The legions. Despite this plethora of information and scholar- auxiliaries were formed into regiments of either five hun- ship on the legions as a whole, there is one particular aspect dred or one thousand men; the foot units were called of the legions which has suffered from a dearth of erudite cohorts while the regiments of horse were known as alae.5 investigation, to wit, the horsemen of the legions: the equites These auxiliary units were the support troops for the legions, legionis of the high empire (ca. 14 B.C.-A.D. 260) and the often deployed as skirmishers either in front of or on the flanks of the legions. Moreover, it was the regiments of aux- equitespromoti of the later empire (ca. A.D. 260-476).7 The iliaries which provided the Roman army with its corps of reason behind this lack of disquisition is a deficiency of "specialists" such as archers and slingers. source material. The number of monuments, inscriptions, The final component of the Roman armed forces was papyri, and literary references for the legionary horsemen the fleet.6 Roman squadrons and flotillas were distributed number somewhat more than a hundred as compared with along the coastal regions of the empire and were also posted the thousands of documents for the legions as a whole. As along the major rivers of the empire. The fleet acted more a result, many truisms about the organization, officers, ranks or less as a coast guard (after all, the Mediterranean was a and role of the legionary horsemen have come into being, Roman lake) although it could, on occasion, be called upon based mainly on the observations of some of the early to aid in amphibious operations, such as the Emperor scholars of Roman army studies. Claudius's invasion of Britain. Of these four major divisions of the Roman military Many of these axioms can now be dispelled, based upon establishment, the best known both to scholar and layman new evidence and the reinterpretation of older evidence in alike are probably the troops of the second category, the light of new discoveries about the legions as a whole or even soldiers of legions. The reason behind this notoriety is the other similar units. But to discuss all the bugbears of the large number of documents concerning the legions preserved legionary horsemen is beyond the scope of this paper. from antiquity. These documents range from official troop The purpose of the present discussion is to look at a rosters to private letters to the gravestones of the soldiers: particular aspect of the legionary horsemen, viz., their equip- these usually record information on the career of the deceas- ment and tactical role. While it has been admitted, rather ed and occasionally even depict him in uniform. reluctantly at least for-the equites legionis, that the legionary horsemen had a battlefield role, it is generally accepted, bas- Michael F. Pavkovi? is the 1989 ASAC Scholarship recipient. He was ed on a dubious passage in Livy (37.7), that their primary born in Allentown, PA, in 1958, attended the Pennsylvania State Universi- duty was to act as messengers for the legionary commander. ty for undergraduate and graduate studies. He is presently completing his Ph.D. at the University of Hawaii at Manoa under the direction of M.P. Their relatively small number, only 120, has also played a Speidel, a leading Roman army scholar. The topic of his dissertation is the part in denigrating the battlefield role of the legionary legionary horseman: organization, officers, ranks, careers, equipment and horsemen. tactical role. His talk to the ASAC is a brief summary of that dissertation. representations in his "battle dress;" many of these depic- tions belong to cavalrymen, who were rather more affluent than their colleages in the infantr~.~These stones generally represent the legionary horsemen in the same poses and with the same equipment as their counterparts in the auxiliary cavalry units. The first century auxiliaries are most often depicted in the so-called rider-relief, where the trooper is shown mounted on his horse riding down a defeated barbarian op- ponent; the soldier is often accompanied by his servant (calo) who carries additional spears (see Figure 1). In the rider-God, also known as the Danubian Rider,9 the equipment shown on the gravestone was that of the trooper when in battle. He is represented with a helmet (usually, at least), protec- tive body-armor, usually chain mail (lorica hamata) or, less frequently, scale mail (lorica squamata), a large shield, a spear capable of being thrust or thrown (hasra), and a sword, usual- ly of the long Celtic-type (spatha). Of the six stones of the legionary horsemen which can be dated to the first century A.D., four represent the deceased in the posture of the Thracian Rider-God (Plate 1)!O Three of the stones are rather badly weathered and as a result on- ly the most obvious articles of equipment are still clearly visible: the shield, the spear, and, in one instance, the helmet." One stone, however, is fairly well-pre~erved!~The stone, from Bonn, represents a certain Caius Marius who served fifteen years in legio I Germanica (Plate 2). Marius is depicted as bare-headed, but wears some type of armor over his tunic; the armor is in turn decorated with his military decorations (dona militaria). The type of the armor cannot be determined from the stone, but was probably painted to represent chain mail?3 He also carries the characteristic spear and shield so well-known from the reliefs of the auxiliaries. The two stones not from the Thracian Rider-God genre show the same basic elements of equipment. One gravestone of two brothers, both equites legionis, from the early first century A.D., has a very small battle scene which shows a legionary horseman in combat with a mounted barbarian op- ponentJ4 The legionary horseman carries the typical cut-oval shield. The second stone, which is anepigraphic, can be PLATE 1 demonstrated to belong to a legionary horseman by the This paper examines the battlefield role of the legionary military decorations the man had won!5 The trooper is cavalrymen based upon their arms and armor, and the in- shown mounted and protected by a chain mail shirt. ferences which can be drawn from this equipment. Three There are two grave reliefs of the legionary horsemen from the early third century A.D. Unlike the first century basic types of evidence can be adduced for the arms and examples, these stones portray the troopers standing about armor of these men: 1) the depictions of legionary horsemen in camp uniform rather than in full battle equipment. One on monuments including their tombstones; 2) the ar- chaeological remains of their arms and armor; and 3) the of our stones thus shows the deceased only with a spear and shield while the other shows the trooper merely with a occasional literary or documentary reference to the equip- ment of the legionary cavalry. sword. This method of representing the soldier in an undress uniform became the norm in the third cent~ry?~It is The Equites Legionis of the High Empire therefore not possible to determine if the equipment of the Of the more than one hundred monumenta which legionary horsemen had changed from that carried by the record the equites legionis of the high empire, eight are tomb- auxiliary troopers, but there is no reason to believe that it stones which preserve a complete depiction of the deceas- had. ed soldier. Six of the stones date to the first century A.D., There is also an imperial, i.e., state-constructed, monu- the period during which we have the largest number of ment, which shows legionary horsemen. This is the early first century triumphal arch at Orange in southern France (ancient Arausio). The monument was erected to celebrate the suppression of a Gallic revolt by legio IIAugusta?' Since the arch was erected to honor legions, the horsemen depicted as part of the Roman force have, no doubt correct- ly, been taken as equites legi~nis?~The equipment of these legionary horsemen is generally the same as appears on the first century tombstones: chain mail, shield, spear and sword (Figure 2).
Recommended publications
  • Legionary Philip Matyszak
    LEGIONARY PHILIP MATYSZAK LEGIONARY The Roman Soldier’s (Unofficial) Manual With 92 illustrations To John Radford, Gunther Maser and the others from 5 Group, Mrewa. Contents Philip Matyszak has a doctorate in Roman history from St John’s College, I Joining the Roman Army 6 Oxford, and is the author of Chronicle of the Roman Republic, The Enemies of Rome, The Sons of Caesar, Ancient Rome on Five Denarii a Day and Ancient Athens on Five Drachmas a Day. He teaches an e-learning course in Ancient II The Prospective Recruit’s History for the Institute of Continuing Education at Cambridge University. Good Legion Guide 16 III Alternative Military Careers 33 HALF-TITLE Legionary’s dagger and sheath. Daggers are used for repairing tent cords, sorting out boot hobnails and general legionary maintenance, and consequently see much more use than a sword. IV Legionary Kit and Equipment 52 TITLE PAGE Trajan addresses troops after battle. A Roman general tries to be near the front lines in a fight so that he can personally comment afterwards on feats of heroism (or shirking). V Training, Discipline and Ranks 78 VI People Who Will Want to Kill You 94 First published in the United Kingdom in 2009 by Thames & Hudson Ltd, 181a High Holborn, London wc1v 7qx VII Life in Camp 115 First paperback edition published in 2018 Legionary © 2009 and 2018 Thames & Hudson Ltd, London VIII On Campaign 128 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording IX How to Storm a City 149 or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome Vs Rome Ing Late Romans Come from the Cover of the Roman Empire in the Middle of the Fourth
    THE BATTLE OF MURSA MAJOR THEME Left-handed warriors? Yes, the image has been mirrored. These charg- Rome vs Rome ing Late Romans come from the cover of The Roman Empire in the middle of the fourth Ancient Warfare VI-5. V century found itself in crisis. It had been split by Constantine the Great between his three surviving sons, Constantine II, Constantius II and Constans. However, soon the brothers were at each other’s throats vying for power. By David Davies onstantine II was defeated by the forces of Constans in AD 340, leav- ingC him in control of the western half of the Roman Empire. Howev- er in AD 350, he in turn was usurped by one of his own generals, Mag- nentius, who took the title Emperor of the West- ern Empire. Constans fled but was ambushed and killed by a troop of light cavalry while his party at- tempted to cross the Pyrenees. Magnentius quickly wooed support from the provinces in Britannia, Gaul, and Hispania with his lax approach to pagan- ism. Other provinces remained hesitant and many remained loyal to the Constan- tinian dynasty. The new Western Roman Emperor tried to exert his control directly by appointing his own men to command provinces and legions, ex- ecuting commanders loyal to the old regime, and by moving his forces into poten- tial rebel territories. When Nepotianus (a nephew of Constantine the Great) stormed Rome with a band of gladiators and pro- claimed himself em- peror, the revolt was swiftly dealt with. It became clear to 1 Wargames, soldiers & strategy 95 Cataphracts from the Eastern and Western Roman Empires square off.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMAN POLITICS DURING the JUGURTHINE WAR by PATRICIA EPPERSON WINGATE Bachelor of Arts in Education Northeastern Oklahoma State
    ROMAN POLITICS DURING THE JUGURTHINE WAR By PATRICIA EPPERSON ,WINGATE Bachelor of Arts in Education Northeastern Oklahoma State University Tahlequah, Oklahoma 1971 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1975 SEP Ji ·J75 ROMAN POLITICS DURING THE JUGURTHINE WAR Thesis Approved: . Dean of the Graduate College 91648 ~31 ii PREFACE The Jugurthine War occurred within the transitional period of Roman politics between the Gracchi and the rise of military dictators~ The era of the Numidian conflict is significant, for during that inter­ val the equites gained political strength, and the Roman army was transformed into a personal, professional army which no longer served the state, but dedicated itself to its commander. The primary o~jec­ tive of this study is to illustrate the role that political events in Rome during the Jugurthine War played in transforming the Republic into the Principate. I would like to thank my adviser, Dr. Neil Hackett, for his patient guidance and scholarly assistance, and to also acknowledge the aid of the other members of my counnittee, Dr. George Jewsbury and Dr. Michael Smith, in preparing my final draft. Important financial aid to my degree came from the Dr. Courtney W. Shropshire Memorial Scholarship. The Muskogee Civitan Club offered my name to the Civitan International Scholarship Selection Committee, and I am grateful for their ass.istance. A note of thanks is given to the staff of the Oklahoma State Uni­ versity Library, especially Ms. Vicki Withers, for their overall assis­ tance, particularly in securing material from other libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 1 Institute of Archaeology Belgrade, Serbia 24. LIMES CONGRESS Serbia 02-09 September 2018 Belgrade - Viminacium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER Institute of Archaeology Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade http://www.ai.ac.rs [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637-191 EDITOR IN CHIEF Miomir Korać Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade EDITORS Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade Nemanja Mrđić Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade GRAPHIC DESIGN Nemanja Mrđić PRINTED BY DigitalArt Beograd PRINTED IN 500 copies ISBN 979-86-6439-039-2 4 CONGRESS COMMITTEES Scientific committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology Miroslav Vujović, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Stefan Pop-Lazić, Institute of Archaeology Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology Nemanja Mrđić, Institute of Archaeology International Advisory Committee David Breeze, Durham University, Historic Scotland Rebecca Jones, Historic Environment Scotland Andreas Thiel, Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Esslingen Nigel Mills, Heritage Consultant, Interpretation, Strategic Planning, Sustainable Development Sebastian Sommer, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Lydmil Vagalinski, National Archaeological Institute with Museum – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Mirjana Sanader, Odsjek za arheologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Organization committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 103 (1994) 223–228
    MICHAEL F. PAVKOVIČ SINGULARES LEGATI LEGIONIS: GUARDS OF A LEGIONARY LEGATE OR A PROVINCIAL GOVERNOR? aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 103 (1994) 223–228 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 223 SINGULARES LEGATI LEGIONIS: GUARDS OF A LEGIONARY LEGATE OR A PROVINCIAL GOVERNOR? In a recent article Dr. N.B.Rankov discusses the famous inscription of Ti.Claudius Maximus from the village of Grammeni near Philippi in Macedonia. Rankov pays particular attention to the rank of singularis legati legionis, interpreted by Prof. M.P.Speidel in his commentary as a guardsman of the legionary commander. Rankov is likewise concerned with the implications that can be drawn from the existence of such guards for the legionary legates.1 The substance of Rankov's argument is that mention of singulares legati legionis does not mean that Claudius Maximus was a bodyguard of the legate in his capacity as legionary commander but rather that the legate was at the time serving as a temporary governor for the province of Moesia.2 Rankov's hypothesis rests on two basic assumptions. The first is that there were extraordinary circumstances which caused the legate to be raised temporarily to the rank of governor. He places this unusual situation in the year A.D. 85 when the Dacians invaded the province and killed the consular governor, Oppius Sabinus.3 Rankov then argues that the governor's death meant heavy casualties amongst his guards, the singulares, which in turn necessitated the formation of a new guard unit for the acting governor. Claudius Maximus was chosen for service in the new guard, but the legionary legate was only an ad hoc governor, retaining his rank, and hence Maximus is styled singularis legati legionis.4 This leads us to Rankov's second premise, which concerns those officers with the right to singulares.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome
    Ancient Rome William E. Dunstan ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK ................. 17856$ $$FM 09-09-10 09:17:21 PS PAGE iii Published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright ᭧ 2011 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All maps by Bill Nelson. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. The cover image shows a marble bust of the nymph Clytie; for more information, see figure 22.17 on p. 370. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dunstan, William E. Ancient Rome / William E. Dunstan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7425-6832-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-7425-6833-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-7425-6834-1 (electronic) 1. Rome—Civilization. 2. Rome—History—Empire, 30 B.C.–476 A.D. 3. Rome—Politics and government—30 B.C.–476 A.D. I. Title. DG77.D86 2010 937Ј.06—dc22 2010016225 ⅜ϱ ீThe paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/ NISO Z39.48–1992. Printed in the United States of America ................
    [Show full text]
  • Vigiles (The Fire Brigade)
    insulae: how the masses lived Life in the city & the emperor Romans Romans in f cus With fires, riots, hunger, disease and poor sanitation being the order of the day for the poor of the city of Rome, the emperor often played a personal role in safeguarding the people who lived in the city. Source 1: vigiles (the fire brigade) In 6 AD the emperor Augustus set up a new tax and used the proceeds to start a new force: the fire brigade, the vigiles urbani (literally: watchmen of the city). They were known commonly by their nickname of spartoli; little bucket-carriers. Bronze water Their duties were varied: they fought fires, pump, used by enforced fire prevention methods, acted as vigiles, called a police force, and even had medical a sipho. doctors in each cohort. British Museum. Source 2: Pliny writes to the emperor for help In this letter Pliny, the governor of Bithynia (modern northern Turkey) writes to the emperor Trajan describing the outbreak of a fire and asking for the emperor’s assistance. Pliny Letters 10.33 est autem latius sparsum, primum violentia It spread more widely at first because of the venti, deinde inertia hominum quos satis force of the wind, then because of the constat otiosos et immobilestanti mali sluggishness of the people who, it is clear, stood around as lazy and immobile spectatores perstitisse; et alioqui nullus spectators of such a great calamity. usquam in publico sipo, nulla hama, nullum Furthermore there was no fire-engine or denique instrumentumad incendia water-bucket anywhere for public use, or in compescenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire
    13 · Roman Large-Scale Mapping in the Early Empire o. A. w. DILKE We have already emphasized that in the period of the A further stimulus to large-scale surveying and map­ early empire1 the Greek contribution to the theory and ping practice in the early empire was given by the land practice of small-scale mapping, culminating in the work reforms undertaken by the Flavians. In particular, a new of Ptolemy, largely overshadowed that of Rome. A dif­ outlook both on administration and on cartography ferent view must be taken of the history of large-scale came with the accession of Vespasian (T. Flavius Ves­ mapping. Here we can trace an analogous culmination pasianus, emperor A.D. 69-79). Born in the hilly country of the Roman bent for practical cartography. The foun­ north of Reate (Rieti), a man of varied and successful dations for a land surveying profession, as already noted, military experience, including the conquest of southern had been laid in the reign of Augustus. Its expansion Britain, he overcame his rivals in the fierce civil wars of had been occasioned by the vast program of colonization A.D. 69. The treasury had been depleted under Nero, carried out by the triumvirs and then by Augustus him­ and Vespasian was anxious to build up its assets. Fron­ self after the civil wars. Hyginus Gromaticus, author of tinus, who was a prominent senator throughout the Fla­ a surveying treatise in the Corpus Agrimensorum, tells vian period (A.D. 69-96), stresses the enrichment of the us that Augustus ordered that the coordinates of surveys treasury by selling to colonies lands known as subseciva.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Historical Arms and Armor the Following Are Some Notes About The
    Semi-Historical Arms and Armor The following are some notes about the weapons and armor tables in D&D 5th edition, as they pertain to their relationship to modern understandings of historical arms and armor. In general, 5th edition is far more accurate to ancient and medieval sources regarding these topics than prior editions, but for the sake of balance and ease of play without the onerous restrictions of reality, there are still some expected incongruences. This article attempts to explain some particular facets about the use of arms and armor throughout our long, shared history, and to offer some suggestions (imbalanced as they may be) on how such items would have been used in particular times and places. A note on generalities: One of the best things 5th edition offers in these tables is the generalization of particular weapons and armor compared to prior editions. Is there a significant, functional difference between a half-sword, arming sword, backsword, wakizashi, tulwar, or any other various forms of predominately one-handed pokey and slashy things with 13 inch, sometimes 14 or 20 or even 30 inch blades? Well, actually yes, but that level of discrimination is often not noticeable in the granularity of the combat mechanics of most systems, and, more importantly, how modern readers often distinguish them is often anachronistic. For instance, almost all straight sword-like weapons, be it arming swords, half-swords, back swords, longswords or even great swords like claymores (but not Messers!) are referred to in ancient and medieval texts (MS I.33, Liberi, etc) as… swords.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Roman Army Free
    FREE THE LATE ROMAN ARMY PDF Gabriele Esposito | 150 pages | 07 Jul 2016 | Winged Hussar Publishing | 9780996365796 | English | United States Roman army of the late Republic - Wikipedia By Steven Wills. It offers significant lessons in how not to manage the army of a great power. Cutting the retirement benefits of a small professional force in favor of smaller taxes for the elite and greater benefits for the masses served only to weaken the desire of Roman citizens to serve. When the Roman citizenry would not join in the numbers required to protect the Empire, Roman elites turned to conscription, which produced only disgruntled recruits, and mass recruitment of barbarian tribes such as the Goths, Visigoths and The Late Roman Army. These tribesmen could be paid less and did not require expansive pensions as an incentive to serve. These three mistakes in the management of the late Roman Imperial Army should serve as a powerful warning to American elites seeking inexpensive solutions to the maintenance of American military power. While some military The Late Roman Army can always be reduced, a great power that seeks very low-cost solutions does so at its own peril. The Roman Army began providing pensions to retiring soldiers during the fall of the Roman Republic in the late first century B. These promises often included financial The Late Roman Army, exemption from taxes and grants of land from captured enemy territory. Augustus reduced the Roman Army to a voluntary, professional force of approximatelyactive duty soldiers and a similar The Late Roman Army of auxiliary troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografia
    Gladius XIII (1977), pp. 103-138 Bibliografía ISSN 0435-029X BIBLIOGRAFIA Avt objects in steel by Tul~Cvaftsmen. Introduced and compiled by M. Malchenko. Photographs by V.Pochayev and V.Stukalov. Aurora Art Publishers, Leningrad 1974, 167 pages, 102 plates, most of them in colour. Text in English and Russian. This beautiful little book with its numerous coloured illustrations of applied art from the world's famous steel centre of Tula is of interest not only to art students but has a special importance to arms and armour investigators. It deals with the 18th and 19th cent. applied art, a period in which the obiects made of steel from the Tula armourers occu~va re- markable place.' Already at the end of the 16th cent. weapon-sZths of the State here performed their work, for instance arquebuses and pistols. In 1712 the Tula Arms Factorv was founded and little bv little the dace here became the centre of Russian arms production. The well-known richlv decorated hunting weaDons had an excellent period about the middle df the 18th cent. any of the finely decorated weapons were used by the emperors. Thus gave, for instance, Catha- rina I1 them as presents to foreign princes and other persons of high rank. Particularly famous was the combination of blued steel with gold ornaments. In these manufactures other kinds of objects, however, flourished. Many kinds of applied art was made, such as seals, perfume burners, candlesticks, caskets, ink-stands and even complete furniture such as chairs. dressing" tables etc. The book illustrates a fine air of ~istols and a sporting gun from about 1790 with steel chiseling, ivory and with copper and silver incrustations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in Their Social, Economic, and Political Context by Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Directo
    The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in their Social, Economic, and Political Context By Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Frank Romer Major Department: History Abstract The goal of this thesis is, as the title affirms, to understand the military reforms of Gaius Marius in their broader societal context. In this thesis, after a brief introduction (Chap. I), Chap. II analyzes the Roman manipular army, its formation, policies, and armament. Chapter III examines Roman society, politics, and economics during the second century B.C.E., with emphasis on the concentration of power and wealth, the legislative programs of Ti. And C. Gracchus, and the Italian allies’ growing demand for citizenship. Chap. IV discusses Roman military expansion from the Second Punic War down to 100 B.C.E., focusing on Roman military and foreign policy blunders, missteps, and mistakes in Celtiberian Spain, along with Rome’s servile wars and the problem of the Cimbri and Teutones. Chap. V then contextualizes the life of Gaius Marius and his sense of military strategy, while Chap VI assesses Marius’s military reforms in his lifetime and their immediate aftermath in the time of Sulla. There are four appendices on the ancient literary sources (App. I), Marian consequences in the Late Republic (App. II), the significance of the legionary eagle standard as shown during the early principate (App. III), and a listing of the consular Caecilii Metelli in the second and early first centuries B.C.E. (App. IV). The Marian military reforms changed the army from a semi-professional citizen militia into a more professionalized army made up of extensively trained recruits who served for longer consecutive terms and were personally bound to their commanders.
    [Show full text]