Representative Participant List by Industry
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Res-Urban-20.Pdf
Transit Friendly Design Features INTRODUCTION North American municipal and regional planning authorities are pursuing urban growth management strategies that preserve or improve urban “livability”. In the Lower Mainland, concerns about air quality and traffic congestion are central themes in regional planning, such as the GVRD Creating Our Future program, and the Transport 2021 project. Growing communities throughout BC share similar concerns. These studies identify a larger role for public transit as a key strategy for achieving a reduction in the number of automobile trips and an improved urban environment. Achieving higher transit ridership is a challenge in an automobile oriented society, and transit agencies should not bear this responsibility alone. Public Transit in B.C. Public transit is provided in over 58 municipal areas in British Columbia, including conventional, paratransit and handyDART services. BC Transit is responsible for planning, funding, marketing, and implementation of these systems. In the regions of Victoria and Vancouver, BC Transit operates these services. In other areas of the province, BC Transit works in partnership with local governments and private contractors to provide transit service. Public transit is simply the movement of people in groups, generally in large vehicles operating on fixed routes and schedules. These services are available to the public at fares that vary from community to community. The conventional bus is the most common vehicle in use in larger urban areas. The emphasis here is on integrating conventional bus service with land use planning. 1 Transit and Land Use Planning Making the Transit Connection ... to Land Use In order to attract more transit customers, the strong influence of land use and urban design on travel behaviour needs to be recognized and utilized to the advantage of transit. -
OSB Representative Participant List by Industry
OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION -
Social Sustainability of Transit: an Overview of the Literature and Findings from Expert Interviews
Social Sustainability of Transit: An Overview of the Literature and Findings from Expert Interviews Kelly Bennett1 and Manish Shirgaokar2 Planning Program, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2E3 1 Research Assistant/Student: [email protected] 2 Principal Investigator/Assistant Professor: [email protected] Phone: (780) 492-2802 Date of publication: 29th February, 2016 Bennett and Shirgaokar Intentionally left blank Page 2 of 45 Bennett and Shirgaokar TABLE OF CONTENTS Funding Statement and Declaration of Conflicting Interests p. 5 ABSTRACT p. 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY p. 7 1. Introduction p. 12 2. Methodology p. 12 3. Measuring Equity p. 13 3.1 Basic Analysis 3.2 Surveys 3.3 Models 3.4 Lorenz Curve and Gini Coefficient 3.5 Evaluating Fare Structure 4. Literature Review p. 16 4.1 Age 4.1.1 Seniors’ Travel Behaviors 4.1.2 Universal Design 4.1.3 Fare Structures 4.1.4 Spatial Distribution and Demand Responsive Service 4.2 Race and Ethnicity 4.2.1 Immigrants 4.2.2 Transit Fares 4.2.3 Non-work Accessibility 4.2.4 Bus versus Light Rail 4.3 Income 4.3.1 Fare Structure 4.3.2 Spatial Distribution 4.3.3 Access to Employment 4.3.4 Non-work Accessibility 4.3.5 Bus versus Light Rail 4.4 Ability 4.4.1 Comfort and Safety 4.4.2 Demand Responsive Service 4.4.3 Universal Design 4.5 Gender 4.5.1 Differences Between Men and Women’s Travel Needs 4.5.2 Safety Page 3 of 45 Bennett and Shirgaokar 5. -
Auto Retailing: Why the Franchise System Works Best
AUTO RETAILING: WHY THE FRANCHISE SYSTEM WORKS BEST Q Executive Summary or manufacturers and consumers alike, the automotive and communities—were much more highly motivated and franchise system is the best method for distributing and successful retailers than factory employees or contractors. F selling new cars and trucks. For consumers, new-car That’s still true today, as evidenced by some key findings franchises create intra-brand competition that lowers prices; of this study: generate extra accountability for consumers in warranty and • Today, the average dealership requires an investment of safety recall situations; and provide enormous local eco- $11.3 million, including physical facilities, land, inventory nomic benefits, from well-paying jobs to billions in local taxes. and working capital. For manufacturers, the franchise system is simply the • Nationwide, dealers have invested nearly $200 billion in most efficient and effective way to distribute and sell automo- dealership facilities. biles nationwide. Franchised dealers invest millions of dollars Annual operating costs totaled $81.5 billion in 2013, of private capital in their retail outlets to provide top sales and • an average of $4.6 million per dealership. These service experiences, allowing auto manufacturers to concen- costs include personnel, utilities, advertising and trate their capital in their core areas: designing, building and regulatory compliance. marketing vehicles. Throughout the history of the auto industry, manufactur- • The vast majority—95.6 percent—of the 17,663 ers have experimented with selling directly to consumers. In individual franchised retail automotive outlets are locally fact, in the early years of the industry, manufacturers used and privately owned. -
STOXX Americas 1200 Last Updated: 02.10.2017
STOXX Americas 1200 Last Updated: 02.10.2017 Rank Rank (PREVIOUS ISIN Sedol RIC Int.Key Company Name Country Currency Component FF Mcap (BEUR) (FINAL) ) US0378331005 2046251 AAPL.OQ AAPL Apple Inc. US USD Y 679.7 1 1 US5949181045 2588173 MSFT.OQ MSFT Microsoft Corp. US USD Y 486.5 2 2 US30303M1027 B7TL820 FB.OQ US20PD FACEBOOK CLASS A US USD Y 342.6 3 3 US0231351067 2000019 AMZN.OQ AMZN Amazon.com Inc. US USD Y 324.0 4 4 US4781601046 2475833 JNJ.N JNJ Johnson & Johnson US USD Y 296.2 5 5 US30231G1022 2326618 XOM.N XON Exxon Mobil Corp. US USD Y 293.8 6 7 US46625H1005 2190385 JPM.N CHL JPMorgan Chase & Co. US USD Y 287.0 7 6 US02079K1079 BYY88Y7 GOOG.OQ US40C2 ALPHABET CLASS C US USD Y 249.6 8 8 US0605051046 2295677 BAC.N NB Bank of America Corp. US USD Y 213.3 9 9 US9497461015 2649100 WFC.N NOB Wells Fargo & Co. US USD Y 209.5 10 12 US00206R1023 2831811 T.N SBC AT&T Inc. US USD Y 203.7 11 11 US7427181091 2704407 PG.N PG Procter & Gamble Co. US USD Y 196.8 12 10 US0846707026 2073390 BRKb.N BRKB Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Cl B US USD Y 193.2 13 13 US1667641005 2838555 CVX.N CHV Chevron Corp. US USD Y 188.3 14 15 US7170811035 2684703 PFE.N PFE Pfizer Inc. US USD Y 180.2 15 16 US3696041033 2380498 GE.N GE General Electric Co. US USD Y 177.6 16 14 US92343V1044 2090571 VZ.N BEL Verizon Communications Inc. -
Making Transit Functional
MAKING TRANSIT FUNCTIONAL A guide to a frequent, affordable, and accessible system in Winnipeg Prepared by FUNCTIONAL TRANSIT WINNIPEG March 16, 2015 [email protected] www.functionaltransit.com “Transit works best where there are many destinations along something that feels like a straight line.” – Jarrett Walker, Human Transit 1 PREFACE This report was compiled by Functional Transit Winnipeg Functional Transit Winnipeg is a grassroots group of Winnipeggers who volunteer their time to research and advocate for improved public transit. This group came together over the concern that the Southwest Corridor will make public transit worse for Winnipeggers. We advocate for improving bus frequency within Winnipeg Transit’s existing service. This report was compiled in order to explain the deficiencies of the current plan for the Southwest Corridor in Winnipeg, and to lay out an alternative strategy that would have a far more positive impact on public transit for the same price as the current project being undertaken by the City of Winnipeg. Our conclusions are drawn from publicly available data, reports from the City of Winnipeg and transit research. We have made every effort to be factually accurate in our assessment of transit service and investment in Winnipeg. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and contributors only. We welcome response and input from those individuals who may have a different interpretation or access to more information. We can be reached at [email protected]. Lead author: Joseph -
France Toutes Les Voitures Particulières Du Groupe
ANALYSE DE PRESSE DE 14H00 30/08/2018 FRANCE TOUTES LES VOITURES PARTICULIÈRES DU GROUPE PSA HOMOLOGUÉES EN WLTP Toutes les voitures particulières Peugeot, Citroën, DS, Opel et Vauxhall sont aujourd’hui homologués selon le protocole WLTP, plus représentatif de la consommation de carburant en usage réel. Grâce à des choix technologiques judicieux réalisés par anticipation de la réglementation – SCR « Selective Catalytic Reduction » et GPF « Filtre à particules essence », le Groupe PSA est ainsi à l’avant-garde de la mise en œuvre des normes les plus strictes. « Nos choix technologiques pour traiter les émissions polluantes, comme la SCR lancée en 2013 sur tous nos moteurs diesel, et plus récemment le GPF sur les moteurs essence à injection directe, nous permettent de proposer à nos clients des véhicules respectueux de l’environnement et de maintenir notre leadership en matière de réduction des émissions », explique Gilles Le Borgne, directeur de la qualité et de l’ingénierie du Groupe PSA. La prochaine étape concernera la norme Euro-6.d-Temp, qui sera applicable à partir de septembre 2019. Cette dernière prendra également en compte les émissions polluantes (NOx, PN) mesurées en conditions de conduite réelles sur routes ouvertes ou RDE (Real Driving Emissions). Source : COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE GROUPE PSA (29/8/18) Par Alexandra Frutos ALLEMAGNE BMW S’EST ASSOCIÉ À LUFTHANSA POUR PROMOUVOIR LA VISION INEXT Le constructeur allemand BMW s’est associé à la compagnie aérienne Lufthansa pour promouvoir la Vision iNext, sa voiture hautement automatisée et 100 % électrique. BMW a en effet organisé une tournée sur 5 jour pour présenter la Vision iNext en Europe, aux Etats- Unis et en Chine. -
Daimler Annual Report 2014
Annual Report 2014. Key Figures. Daimler Group 2014 2013 2012 14/13 Amounts in millions of euros % change Revenue 129,872 117,982 114,297 +10 1 Western Europe 43,722 41,123 39,377 +6 thereof Germany 20,449 20,227 19,722 +1 NAFTA 38,025 32,925 31,914 +15 thereof United States 33,310 28,597 27,233 +16 Asia 29,446 24,481 25,126 +20 thereof China 13,294 10,705 10,782 +24 Other markets 18,679 19,453 17,880 -4 Investment in property, plant and equipment 4,844 4,975 4,827 -3 Research and development expenditure 2 5,680 5,489 5,644 +3 thereof capitalized 1,148 1,284 1,465 -11 Free cash flow of the industrial business 5,479 4,842 1,452 +13 EBIT 3 10,752 10,815 8,820 -1 Value added 3 4,416 5,921 4,300 -25 Net profit 3 7,290 8,720 6,830 -16 Earnings per share (in €) 3 6.51 6.40 6.02 +2 Total dividend 2,621 2,407 2,349 +9 Dividend per share (in €) 2.45 2.25 2.20 +9 Employees (December 31) 279,972 274,616 275,087 +2 1 Adjusted for the effects of currency translation, revenue increased by 12%. 2 For the year 2013, the figures have been adjusted due to reclassifications within functional costs. 3 For the year 2012, the figures have been adjusted, primarily for effects arising from application of the amended version of IAS 19. Cover photo: Mercedes-Benz Future Truck 2025. -
Sustainability Report Bmw Brilliance Automotive Ltd. Contents
2015 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT BMW BRILLIANCE AUTOMOTIVE LTD. CONTENTS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT PRODUCT RESPONSIBILITY Preface 3 1.1 Our management approach 10 2.1 Our management approach 39 Our point of view 4 1.2 Stakeholder engagement 16 2.2 Efficient mobility 44 Highlights 2015 5 1.3 Compliance, anti-corruption and 18 2.3 Product safety 48 An overview of BMW Brilliance 6 human rights 2.4 Customer satisfaction 51 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES 3.1 Our management approach 57 4.1 Our management approach 72 5.1 Our management approach 87 3.2 Energy consumption and emissions 59 4.2 Minimising supplier risk 77 5.2 Attractive employer 90 3.3 Waste reduction 63 4.3 Utilising supplier opportunities 83 5.3 Occupational health and safety 96 3.4 Water 68 5.4 Training and development 99 CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP APPENDIX 6.1 Our management approach 107 7.1 About this report 120 6.2 Corporate citizenship 112 7.2 UN Global Compact index 121 7.3 GRI G4 content index 125 2 PREFACE Next, a further step in developing China’s very own new energy vehicle brand. In the future, we will expand our offering of locally developed, produced and environmentally friendly premium vehicles for our Chinese customers. Digitalisation is an important driver for sustainability. We are developing new solutions for intelligent mobility AT BMW BRILLIANCE, WE SEE SUSTAINABILITY AS products and services. At the same time, we are increasing the quality of our products, as well as the speed A KEY TO OUR CONTINUOUS SUCCESS IN CHINA. -
2002 Ford Motor Company Annual Report
2228.FordAnnualCovers 4/26/03 2:31 PM Page 1 Ford Motor Company Ford 2002 ANNUAL REPORT STARTING OUR SECOND CENTURY STARTING “I will build a motorcar for the great multitude.” Henry Ford 2002 Annual Report STARTING OUR SECOND CENTURY www.ford.com Ford Motor Company G One American Road G Dearborn, Michigan 48126 2228.FordAnnualCovers 4/26/03 2:31 PM Page 2 Information for Shareholders n the 20th century, no company had a greater impact on the lives of everyday people than Shareholder Services I Ford. Ford Motor Company put the world on wheels with such great products as the Model T, Ford Shareholder Services Group Telephone: and brought freedom and prosperity to millions with innovations that included the moving EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. Within the U.S. and Canada: (800) 279-1237 P.O. Box 43087 Outside the U.S. and Canada: (781) 575-2692 assembly line and the “$5 day.” In this, our centennial year, we honor our past, but embrace Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3087 E-mail: [email protected] EquiServe Trust Company N.A. offers the DirectSERVICE™ Investment and Stock Purchase Program. This shareholder- paid program provides a low-cost alternative to traditional retail brokerage methods of purchasing, holding and selling Ford Common Stock. Company Information The URL to our online Investor Center is www.shareholder.ford.com. Alternatively, individual investors may contact: Ford Motor Company Telephone: Shareholder Relations Within the U.S. and Canada: (800) 555-5259 One American Road Outside the U.S. and Canada: (313) 845-8540 Dearborn, Michigan 48126-2798 Facsimile: (313) 845-6073 E-mail: [email protected] Security analysts and institutional investors may contact: Ford Motor Company Telephone: (313) 323-8221 or (313) 390-4563 Investor Relations Facsimile: (313) 845-6073 One American Road Dearborn, Michigan 48126-2798 E-mail: [email protected] To view the Ford Motor Company Fund and the Ford Corporate Citizenship annual reports, go to www.ford.com. -
Reporte Anual 2006 Índice
GRUPO CARSO, S. A. B. DE C. V. MIGUEL DE CERVANTES SAAVEDRA # 255, COL. GRANADA MÉXICO, D.F. C.P. 11520 “REPORTE ANUAL QUE SE PRESENTA DE ACUERDO CON LAS DISPOSICIONES DE CARÁCTER GENERAL APLICABLES A LAS EMISORAS DE VALORES Y A OTROS PARTICIPANTES DEL MERCADO, POR EL AÑO TERMINADO EL 31 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2006.” Clave de cotización: “GCARSO” Acciones Serie “A-1”, ordinarias, nominativas, sin expresión de valor nominal, correspondientes al capital mínimo fijo sin derecho a retiro. Los valores de la empresa se encuentran inscritos en la Sección de Valores del Registro Nacional de Valores, y cotizan en la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S. A. de C. V. La inscripción en el Registro Nacional de Valores e Intermediarios no implica certificación sobre la bondad de los valores, solvencia de la emisora o sobre la exactitud o veracidad de la información contenida en el Reporte Anual, ni convalida los actos que, en su caso, hubieren sido realizados en contravención de las leyes. Grupo Carso Reporte Anual 2006 Índice 1) INFORMACIÓN GENERAL a) GLOSARIO DE TÉRMINOS Y DEFINICIONES…...…………………………………………........2 b) RESUMEN EJECUTIVO………..………………………………………………………………........4 c) FACTORES DE RIESGO………………………………………………………………………..…...7 d) OTROS VALORES …………………………..……………………………………………………..11 e) CAMBIOS SIGNIFICATIVOS A LOS DERECHOS DE VALORES INSCRITOS EN EL REGISTRO………………………………………………………………………….……….12 f) DESTINO DE LOS FONDOS ………………………………….……………………………….….12 g) DOCUMENTOS DE CARÁCTER PÚBLICO……………………………………..……………....12 2) LA EMISORA a) HISTORIA Y DESARROLLO DE LA EMISORA……………………………………………........13 -
Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions
Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions (January 1993 - April 2020) Huntington BAE Spirit Booz Allen L3Harris Precision Rolls- Airbus Boeing CACI Perspecta General Dynamics GE Honeywell Leidos SAIC Leonardo Technologies Lockheed Martin Ingalls Northrop Grumman Castparts Safran Textron Thales Raytheon Technologies Systems Aerosystems Hamilton Industries Royce Airborne tactical DHPC Technologies L3Harris airport Kopter Group PFW Aerospace to Aviolinx Raytheon Unisys Federal Airport security Hydroid radio business to Hutchinson airborne tactical security businesses Vector Launch Otis & Carrier businesses BAE Systems Dynetics businesses to Leidos Controls & Data Premiair Aviation radios business Fiber Materials Maintenance to Shareholders Linndustries Services to Valsef United Raytheon MTM Robotics Next Century Leidos Health to Distributed Energy GERAC test lab and Technologies Inventory Locator Service to Shielding Specialities Jet Aviation Vienna PK AirFinance to ettain group Night Vision business Solutions business to TRC Base2 Solutions engineering to Sopemea 2 Alestis Aerospace to CAMP Systems International Hamble aerostructure to Elbit Systems Stormscope product eAircraft to Belcan 2 GDI Simulation to MBDA Deep3 Software Apollo and Athene Collins Psibernetix ElectroMechanical Aciturri Aeronautica business to Aernnova IMX Medical line to TransDigm J&L Fiber Services to 0 Knight Point Aerospace TruTrak Flight Systems ElectroMechanical Systems to Safran 0 Pristmatic Solutions Next Generation 911 to Management