COMPRESSION, WHY, WHAT AND COMPROMISES Authors Hightower, Paul Publisher International Foundation for Telemetering Journal International Telemetering Conference Proceedings Rights Copyright © held by the author; distribution rights International Foundation for Telemetering Download date 06/10/2021 11:41:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/631710 COMPRESSION, WHY, WHAT AND COMPROMISES Paul Hightower Instrumentation Technology Systems Northridge, CA 91324
[email protected] ABSTRACT Each 1080 video frame requires 6.2 MB of storage; archiving a one minute clip requires 22GB. Playing a 1080p/60 video requires sustained rates of 400 MB/S. These storage and transport parameters pose major technical and cost hurdles. Even the latest technologies would only support one channel of such video. Content creators needed a solution to these road blocks to enable them to deliver video to viewers and monetize efforts. Over the past 30 years a pyramid of techniques have been developed to provide ever increasing compression efficiency. These techniques make it possible to deliver movies on Blu-ray disks, over Wi-Fi and Ethernet. However, there are tradeoffs. Compression introduces latency, image errors and resolution loss. The exact effect may be different from image to image. BER may result the total loss of strings of frames. We will explore these effects and how they impact test quality and reduce the benefits that HD cameras/lenses bring telemetry. INTRODUCTION Over the past 15 years we have all become accustomed to having television, computers and other video streaming devices show us video in high definition. It has become so commonplace that our community nearly insists that it be brought to the telemetry and test community so that better imagery can be used to better observe and model systems behaviors.