DOCSLIB.ORG

Studies in the Book of Daniel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Studies in the Book of Daniel Studies in the Book of Daniel By Nyron Medina Daniel in the Lions Den Published by Thusia Seventh Day Adventist Church INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK OF DANIEL 1. God had warned Israel that obedience to His law would bring blessings. Deut. 28:1-14. 2. But disobedience would bring retribution (retributive judgment). Deut. 28:15-48. 3. God sent Nebuchadnezzer as judgments upon Judah because they (the Jews of Judah) were in much iniquity and had profaned the temple. (2 kin. 23:34-37; 2 Kin. 24:1-5); 2 Chr. 36:1-7. 4. The nation was captured and put to tribute. There were three captivities of the Jews. Daniel and the three Hebrews were in the first captivity (606 B.C.B.). i. 1st. Captivity– Dan. 1:1,2. ii. 2nd. Captivity– 2 Chr. 36:8-10; 2 Kin. 24:6-17. iii. 3rd. Captivity– 2 Chr. 36:11-20; 2 Kin. 24:17-20; 2 Kin. 25:1-11. 5. Ezekiel and others were in the second captivity. Eze. 1:1,2. 6. Under the third attack the nation was destroyed and its sanctuary (586 B.C.B.). See the third siege No. 4. 7. God placed Daniel as His minister of the gospel in the courts of Babylon (while Ezekiel was by the captives of the Jews in the land where they were placed, and while Jeremiah was yet in Judah before it was totally destroyed.). 8. God showed to Daniel what would be the future. Would Gentile kingdoms rule the world forever or would His eternal kingdom be set up? His judgment would cause kingdoms to rise and fall until the final judgment which will establish the eternal kingdom. 9. The theme of the book of Daniel is “Judgment” it shows general (retributive) judgment upon nations until the final pre-advent judgment (the Investigative Judgment) is to determine the setting up of the final eternal messianic kingdom. Dan. 2:29-45. This is the key text. 10. There are nine judgments. One is Retributive Judgment. Ps. 103:6. 11. Another is the Investigative Judgment. Rev. 11:18,19; 1 Jn. 4:17; Jam. 2:8-13; Jam. 5:20; Gal. 5:5. 12. The book of Daniel is primarily about the final pre-advent judgment. The Investigative Judgment. This is the high point of all its prophetic events parts. Dan. 2:44,45; Dan. 7:9,10,13,14,22; Dan. 8:14,26; Dan. 12:1,12. DANIEL CHAPTER ONE 1. A translation of Daniel chapter one. [1] In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it. [2] And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with part of the vessels of the house of God: which he carried into the land of Shinar to the house of his god; and he brought the vessels into the treasure house of his god. [3] And the king spake unto Ashpenaz the master of his eunuchs, that he should bring certain of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes; [4] Children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king's palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans. [5] And the king appointed them a daily provision of the king's meat, and of the wine which he drank: so nourishing them three years, that at the end thereof they might stand before the king. [6] Now among these were of the children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: [7] Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names: for he gave unto Daniel the name of Belteshazzar; and to Hananiah, of Shadrach; and to Mishael, of Meshach; and to Azariah, of Abednego. [8] But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat, nor with the wine which he drank: therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself. [9] Now God had brought Daniel into favour and tender love with the prince of the eunuchs. [10] And the prince of the eunuchs said unto Daniel, I fear my lord the king, who hath appointed your meat and your drink: for why should he see your faces worse liking than the children which are of your sort? then shall ye make me endanger my head to the king. [11] Then said Daniel to Melzar, whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, [12] Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink. [13] Then let our countenances be looked upon before thee, and the countenance of the children that eat of the portion of the king's meat: and as thou seest, deal with thy servants. [14] So he consented to them in this matter, and proved them ten days. [15] And at the end of ten days their countenances appeared fairer and fatter in flesh than all the children which did eat the portion of the king's meat. [16] Thus Melzar took away the portion of their meat, and the wine that they should drink; and gave them pulse. [17] As for these four children, God gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom: and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams. [18] Now at the end of the days that the king had said he should bring them in, then the prince of the eunuchs brought them in before Nebuchadnezzar. [19] And the king communed with them; and among them all was found none like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: therefore stood they before the king. [20] And in all matters of wisdom and understanding, that the king inquired of them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and astrologers that were in all his realm. [21] And Daniel continued even unto the first year of king Cyrus. 2. [1] In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it. [2] And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with part of the vessels of the house of God: which he carried into the land of Shinar to the house of his god; and he brought the vessels into the treasure house of his god. 3. The overthrow of Judah was predicted in Jer. 25:1,2,8-11. 4. [3] And the king spake unto Ashpenaz the master of his eunuchs, that he should bring certain of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes; [6] Now among these were of the children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: 5. Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah were captured in this captivity. 2 Kin. 20:12-18. 6. The meaning of their names are: i. Daniel: God is my judge (judge—God). ii. Hananiah: Gift of Yahweh. iii. Mishael: Who is what God is. iv. Azariah: Whom Yahweh helps. 7. [7] Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names: for he gave unto Daniel the name of Belteshazzar; and to Hananiah, of Shadrach; and to Mishael, of Meshach; and to Azariah, of Abednego. 8. The meaning of their heathen names are: i. Belteshazzar: Prince of Bel. ii. Shadrach: Servant of sin (moon god). iii. Meshach: Who is what Aku is (Sumerian god sin). iv. Abed-nego: Servant of Nebo. 9. [8] But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat, nor with the wine which he drank: therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself. 10. Daniel had three reasons why the king’s meat would defile him. They were: 11. [12] Prove thy servants, I beseech thee, ten days; and let them give us pulse to eat, and water to drink. 12. The source of Daniel’s vegetarianism is in Gen. 1:29; Ex. 16:1-3; Num. 11:4-35. Hebrew (pulse) Zehrohgeem. Hebrew Zehrag derived from Gen. 1:11,12,29. 13.[20] And in all matters of wisdom and understanding, that the king inquired of them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and astrologers that were in all his realm. 14. The source of Daniel’s wisdom (Vs. 17,20); Ps. 119:66,98-100; Pr. 8:4-17,22,23. 15. [21] And Daniel continued even unto the first year of king Cyrus. 16. Daniel lived up to ninety (90) years. 18 + 70 = 88 years—Dan. 9:1,2; Jer. 25:11; Jer. 29:10; Dan. 10:1 = 90 years. THE END DANIEL CHAPTER TWO PART ONE 1. A translation of Daniel chapter two. [1] And in the second year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar dreamed dreams, wherewith his spirit was troubled, and his sleep brake from him. [2] Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans, for to shew the king his dreams. So they came and stood before the king. [3] And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream, and my spirit was troubled to know the dream. [4] Then spake the Chaldeans to the king in Syriack, O king, live for ever: tell thy servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NEWSLETTER 182.Indd
    ENDTIME ISSUES NEWSLETTER No. 182 “The Immortality of the Soul” Samuele Bacchiocchi Retired Professor of Theology, Andrews University Chapter 2 of the forthcoming book POPULAR BELIEFS: ARE THEY BIBLICAL? INDEX OF TOPICS OF THIS NEWSLETTER * How to Subscribe and Unsubscribe * New Outreach Book: Popular Beliefs: Are they Biblical? * A Plea for Help to Edit the Manuscript * A Report of the Friends of the Sabbath Conference * A New DVD Album: Abundant Life Seminar * Books from Two Private Libraries for Sale “The Immortality of the Soul” (The Essay of this Newsletter) ANNOUNCEMENT OF SERVICES & PRODUCTS * How to Contact the Center for Cancer Care in Goshen, Indiana that has healed my liver cancer. * Special offer on the Package of 10 DVD/CD albums, containing all the recordings of Prof. Jon Paulien, Prof, Graeme Bradford, and Prof. Bacchiocchi. The package includes also the newly released DVD Abundant Life Seminar. * Introductory offer on Prof. Jon Paulien’s DVD album on Simply Revelation * Special offer on the new edition of Prof. Bradford More than a Prophet, together with a free DVD album. * Upcoming seminars for August, and September * Incredible Offer on the new Hitachi 3000 Lumens Projector Only $1395.00 The Immortality of the Soul 2 * The Smallest and most Powerful Remote Presenter * Does your church or School Need a Screen? * Bed and Breakfast in London, England * TAGNET new Web-hosting offer HOW TO SUBSCRIBE AND UNSUBSCRIBE To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter, please email your re- quest to <[email protected]> To avoid past prob- lems, we will add or remove your address manually.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soteriology of Ellen G. White Compared with the Lutheran
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 1995 The Soteriology of Ellen G. White Compared with the Lutheran Formula of Concord: a Study of the Adventist Doctrine of the Final Judgment of the Saints and Their Justification Before God Gunnar Pedersen Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Pedersen, Gunnar, "The Soteriology of Ellen G. White Compared with the Lutheran Formula of Concord: a Study of the Adventist Doctrine of the Final Judgment of the Saints and Their Justification Before God" (1995). Dissertations. 126. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/126 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. a History of Questions on Doctrine
    A History of Questions on Doctrine 1 Fidelity or Compromise? Russell Roland Standish Lessons from the First Advent “Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God.” 1 With these startling words our Saviour laid bare the poverty of Biblical understanding of the Sadducees, the most liberal element of God’s Church in His day. 2 The contemporary conservatives, the Pharisees, fared no better. Christ prefaced His response to their question concerning the payment of tax with the words, “Why tempt me ye hypocrites?” 3 Christ’s answer to this latter question left the Pharisees so embarrassed that “When they had heard these words, they marveled, and left him, and went their way.” 4 The Sadducees were similarly humiliated before the listening church members who were “astonished at his doctrine.” 5 Here were the leaders of God’s designated church on earth, the intelligentsia of that church, exposed as Scriptural ignoramuses, by a young man whose curriculum vitae lacked any College or University education and whose lone “elementary” education was supplied in a home-schooling environment. Yet at the age of twelve He was vastly superior in the knowledge of the Old Testament to the most eminent theologians of the day. 6, 7 God’s Church at the time of the First Advent was led by ecclesiastical leaders and doctrinally influenced by theologians, both of whom were teaching rank apostasy. To declare this plain fact concerning the Jewish Church in our Seventh- day Adventist Churches of the twenty-first century would arouse little, if any, opposition from the communicants present.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry 1-2017.Qxp Maquette 11/12/16 19:47 Page1 Ministry 1-2017.Qxp Maquette 11/12/16 19:47 Page2
    Ministry 1-2017.qxp_maquette 11/12/16 19:47 Page1 Ministry 1-2017.qxp_maquette 11/12/16 19:47 Page2 ® SOMMAIRE Ministry 4 Le final de la symphonie 3 Éditorial biblique : une vision d’adoration Jon Paulien 7, 28 Réveil et Réforme 14 Nouvelles 8 Le sanctuaire céleste : un modèle pour le sanctuaire 19 Livre terrestre Patrick Anani Ministry®, Revue internationale pour les pasteurs 12501 Old Columbia Pike, Silver Spring, MD 20904-6600 U.S.A. www.ministrymagazine.org Le pupitre et la croissance [email protected] 11 Rédacteur en chef : de l’Église Rédacteur adjoint : Joe A. Webb Rédacteur en chef intérimaire : Jerry N. Page Rédacteur de l’édition en français : 15 Gagner en renonçant : Bernard Sauvagnat les avantages du jeûne chrétien S. Joseph Kidder & Kristy L. Hodson Secrétaire de rédaction : Sheryl Beck Responsable financier et de fabrication : John Feezer IV Conseillers internationaux : Elias Brasil de Souza, Ron Clouzet, Michael D. Collins, Daniel Devadhas, Carlos Hein, Patrick Johnson, Victor Kozakov, Geoffrey Mbwana, Musa Mitekaro, Passmore Mulambo, Daniel Opoku-Boateng, Hector Sanchez, Branimir Schubert, Houtman Sinaga, Ivan L. Williams, Ted N.C. Wilson. Publicité : [email protected] Les paraboles de l’homme riche Abonnements et changements d’adresse 20 [email protected]; +1 301-680-6511; +1 301-680-6502 (fax) et de Lazare et certains récits de Couverture : 316 Creative, Dominique Gilson Maquette & corrections : Dominique Gilson - France révélations de la vie après la mort Tarif : 4 numéros pour le monde entier : 10 US$. Pour commander, envoyer nom, adresse Kim Papaioannou et règlement à Ministry® Subscriptions, 12501 Old Columbia Pike, Silver Spring, MD 20904-6600 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Time of the Second Coming and the Members of the Sanhedrin
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 2018 The Time Of The Second Coming And The Members Of The Sanhedrin Alina Roxana Lupu Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Lupu, Alina Roxana, "The Time Of The Second Coming And The Members Of The Sanhedrin" (2018). Master's Theses. 119. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/119 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE TIME OF THE SECOND COMING AND THE MEMBERS OF THE SANHEDRIN by Alina-Roxana Lupu Chair: Laurențiu Florentin Moț, Ph.D. ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Thesis Andrews University Master of Arts Title: THE TIME OF THE SECOND COMING AND THE MEMBERS OF THE SANHEDRIN Name of researcher: Alina-Roxana Lupu Name and degree of faculty chair: Laurențiu Florentin Moț, Ph.D. Date completed: April 2018 Problems The aspects related to the time of the Second Coming of Jesus were a constant concern of the believers and Bible’s scholars. There are many challenging verses in the Scripture that are talking about the Parousia in temporal terms. This present study was to determine to what extend Jesus’ answer before the Sanhedrin (Matt 26:64) was related to the time of the Parousia and with that generation of his accusers.
    [Show full text]
  • Justinian's Metamorphosis from Chief of Staffs to Th
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 7, No. 1; January 2017 538 A.D. and the Transition from Pagan Roman Empire to Holy Roman Empire: Justinian’s Metamorphosis from Chief of Staffs to Theologian*1 Keum Young Ahn; Gerard Damsteegt; Edwin de Kock; Sook Young Kim; Jhung Haeng Kwon; Myun Ju Lee; Nicolas Miller; Dae Geuk Nam; Trevor O’ Reggio; William H. Shea; Alberto R. Treiyer; Koot van Wyk Emeritii, or Retired, or Active Professors and Researchers Abstract The year 538 A.D. became the turning point in the history of the Roman Empire since so many aspects on political, administrative and economical levels were already switched off that when Justinian declared himself to be a theologian from this year and no longer a soldier, he crossed the barrier of his mandate between what is purely civil obligation and what is religious obligation, similarly to Constantine before, and entered in competition with the papal function and this role is evidence of Justinian’s ongoing caesaro-papism. The quest for unification of the empire by unification of the church, the fever for church-building projects with his wife Theodora, the persecution of enemies of the church and heretics, his disdain with the Sabbath although his second name was Sabbatini, his support for suppressing any eschatological fever in line with the church fathers and Oecumenius and yet trying to build the ‘Kingdom of God’ on earth, all this indicate the problem 538 was for the Roman Empire and the Catholic Church. Archaeological and historical original sources of Justinian and contemporaries of popes, biographer of Justinian and a commentator on Revelation (Oecumenius) are very revealing of these times and the shift or transition of what belonged to the Roman Empire handed over since 538 A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • What Le Roy Froom Did
    What Le Roy Froom did to Form a New Movement “Among” SDA’s Le Roy Edwin Froom - 1890 – 1974 Following information was adapted from Truth Seeker Church What Le Roy Froom did: 1) Falsify the history about the original SDA pioneer position regarding the trinity. This revisionist history can be seen in the books Questions on Doctrine and Movement of Destiny. While Froom is not the originator of this tactic he is most certainly the key perpetuater and popularizer of it. 2) Burn evidence to the contrary. This little known fact reveals much about Mr. Froom. True historians do not burn the source material yet Froom did! When I learned about this I was not even surprised. It fit the pattern perfectly because based on the personal letters that he received LeRoy Froom actually knew the truth but chose to lie anyway. It's just more dishonest, underhanded tactics on Froom's part. 3) Promote unbegottenism by introducing new theology and playing a part in having the old pioneer references to the begotten Son expunged. Due to this Froom is certainly culpable for the psuedo-tritheistic doctrine that exists in Adventism today. 4) Manipulate the inspired data from the Spirit of prophecy. Froom did this on a few subjects. Basically he used partial data presentations, out of context quotations and ellipses to make Mrs. White seem like she was supporting doctrines that she really was not (i.e. trinity, [pre- fall, sinless flesh] nature of Christ, [completed] atonement [at Calvary]) [brackets added for clarity] Movement of Destiny or Movement of Deception? Leroy Froom was best known in the Seventh-day Adventist church for his work as editor for several church publications, a church historian, secretary of the General Conference Ministerial Association, and author of several books.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reformation Churches
    Understanding Revelation – Topic 4 The Reformation churches From triumph to defeat An exposition of Revelation Chapter 3:1-6 Contents Time period of Sardis .....................................................................................................................3 Significance of Christ’s titles.........................................................................................................3 Christ’s complaint...........................................................................................................................4 Causes of the decline of the church of Sardis....................................................................................................................5 1. Union of Church and State.........................................................................................................................................6 2. Formation of rigid creeds............................................................................................................................................6 3. Adherence to unscriptural doctrines..........................................................................................................................7 4. The Counter Reformation.........................................................................................................................................10 5. The Age of Reason...................................................................................................................................................11 Christ’s
    [Show full text]
  • La Vérité Mise À L'épreuve
    LLAA VVÉÉRRIITTÉÉ MMIISSEE ÀÀ LL''ÉÉPPRREEUUVVEE Donald K. Short et Robert J. Wieland 1 Chapitre 1 La Vérité mise à l'épreuve La compréhension du sujet de la nature humaine du Christ conduit à une vie spirituelle vivante, ou morte. "Sauve-toi pour ta vie" ... votre seule chance d'échapper consiste à passer à travers un étroit passage à gué ouvert sur la rivière. Les soldats ont installé un poste de contrôle. Votre "passeport" pour éviter la mort consiste à prouver votre identité en parlant un insaisissable dialecte, un peu comme si l'on vous demandait de rouler les "R" pour prouver que vous êtes un véritable Écossais. Pouvez-vous dire "shibboleth ?" Ou prononcerez- vous, comme le ferait un enfant : "sibboleth ?" Vous ne pouvez pas tricher. Votre tête sera coupée si vous ne pouvez pas prononcer cela correctement. Nous apprenons que 42 000 Éphraïmites tombèrent au Jourdain parce qu'ils ne parvinrent pas à prononcer le mot d'une manière 2 qui satisfasse les soldats (Juges 12:5-6). La question de la nature du Christ est-elle notre "shibboleth Adventiste ?" Sommes-nous en train de nous diviser au sujet d'une bagatelle théologique, condamnant ceux qui ne réussissent pas à se prononcer correctement sur ce sujet ? Un récent numéro de "Newsletter for the Association of Adventist Forums" dit : "Les différences théologiques et herméneutiques semblent être une particularité de l'Adventisme. Les communautés et les amis sont divisés, et nous pouvons nous demander si de telles différences sont vraiment importantes ?" (mai 1997). En écrivant cet ouvrage, nous n'essayons pas de résoudre de compliqués problèmes sémantiques d'une manière théorique et académique.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerson Cardoso Rodrigues1
    THE MILLERITES AND THE SEVEN TRUMPETS OF REVELATION Os Mileritas e as Sete Trombetas do Apocalipse Gerson Cardoso Rodrigues1 ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to present the Millerite’s growth, understanding and contribution on the interpretation of the seven trumpets of the book of Revelation. This research will be a documentary study based on published primary sources. Since many Millerites wrote articles and letters in which they mention their interpretation on the trumpets, it is above the scope of this research to comment on all of them. Therefore, the article will focus on William Miller (founder of the Millerite movement) and Josiah Litch (the “theologian” of the movement). Nevertheless, it does not exclude brief comments about other Millerites. Secondary sources will be used where appropriate to furnish information concerning historical context and background of perceptive insights. It is beyond the scope of this research, however, to either depict in detail the development of their interpretation or to analyze what was original from them and what they copied from contemporary expositors. Moreover, this research does not intend to examine every detail of the prophecy but only explore the dates and events they hold as the beginning and ending of the trumpets. KEYWORD: SEVEN TRUMPETS; MILLERITE; WILLIAM MILLER; JOSIAH LITCH RESUMO O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o crescimento, entendimento e contribuição do movimento milerita sobre o tema das sete trombetas do livro do Apocalipse. Esta pesquisa será um estudo bibliográfico baseado em fontes primárias publicadas. Desde que muitos mileritas escreveram artigos e cartas nas quais eles mencionam suas interpretações sobre as trombetas, está além do objetivo deste estudo comentar sobre todos eles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Definition and Short History of Historicism As a Method for Interpreting Daniel and Revelation
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 14/2 (Fall 2003): 1–14. Article copyright © 2003 by Reimar Vetne. A Definition and Short History of Historicism as a Method for Interpreting Daniel and Revelation Reimar Vetne Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Andrews University The main approach Adventists have taken to the books of Daniel and Revelation, the so-called historicist method of prophetic interpretation,1 was no invention of Adventists. It was the most commonly used approach throughout most of church history. Yet today few outside the denomination share the ap- proach, and it seems hard even to get others to understand the Adventist posi- tion. This article will reflect on ways the term historicism has been understood and communicated by Adventists. I will suggest some elements that might be useful to share in conversations with non-Adventist interpretersÑnamely a defi- nition of historicism and a brief history of its prominent usage throughout church history. Follow-up articles by Jon Paulien will reflect on and evaluate the historicist method in light of recent scholarship (this issue)2 and some select cases from the biblical data (forthcoming). The Nature of Historicism Historicism as ÒSchool-of-Interpretation.Ó The traditional way Advent- ists use the term historicism (in relation to interpretation of biblical prophecy) is 1The essence of the historicist approach is part of the official faith of the Seventh-day Advent- ist church, last confirmed in a report by the Methods of Bible Study Committee approved by the 1986 General Conference Annual Council: Òapocalyptic [prophecy] emphasizes the sovereignty of God and His control over history,Ó Òapocalyptic prophecy presents the course of history from the time of the prophet to the end of the world.Ó ÒActions of General Interest From the 1986 Annual CouncilÑ1,Ó Adventist Review (Jan 22, 1987): 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventisté Sedmého Dne Mezi Modernou a Postmodernou
    Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích Teologická fakulta Katedra filosofie a religionistiky Disertační práce ADVENTISTÉ SEDMÉHO DNE MEZI MODERNOU A POSTMODERNOU Vedoucí práce: Doc. Mgr. Jaroslav Vokoun, Th.D. Autor práce: Mgr. Bedřich Jetelina Studijní obor: Teologická antropologie a etika Ročník: III. 2012 Prohlašuji, že svoji disertační práci jsem vypracoval samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Dále prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své disertační práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě, elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledku obhajoby disertační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů. V Praze 1. října 2012 Děkuji svému školiteli Doc. Mgr. Jaroslavu Vokounovi, Th.D. za cenné rady, připomínky a metodické vedení práce. Dále děkuji své manželce a rodině za trpělivost, kterou se mnou měli během času, který jsem psaní tohoto textu věnoval. Obsah ÚVOD ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]