State Party Region Number of WH Properties Response Received

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Party Region Number of WH Properties Response Received Number of WH Response State Party Region Properties received Afghanistan Asia and the Pacific 2 Albania Europe and North America 2 X Algeria Arab States 7 Andorra Europe and North America 1 X Angola Africa 0 Antigua and Barbuda Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Argentina Latin America and the Caribbean 10 Armenia Europe and North America 3 X Australia Asia and the Pacific 19 X Austria Europe and North America 9 X Azerbaijan Europe and North America 2 Bahamas Latin America and the Caribbean 0 Bahrain Arab States 2 Bangladesh Asia and the Pacific 3 X Barbados Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Belarus Europe and North America 4 X Belgium Europe and North America 12 Belize Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Benin Africa 1 Bhutan Asia and the Pacific 0 Bolivia (Plurinational State of Latin America and the Caribbean 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina Europe and North America 3 Botswana Africa 2 Brazil Latin America and the Caribbean 20 Brunei Darussalam Asia and the Pacific 0 Bulgaria Europe and North America 9 X Burkina Faso Africa 1 Burundi Africa 0 Cabo Verde Africa 1 X Cambodia Asia and the Pacific 2 Cameroon Africa 2 Canada Europe and North America 18 X Central African Republic Africa 2 Chad Africa 2 X Chile Latin America and the Caribbean 6 China Asia and the Pacific 50 Colombia Latin America and the Caribbean 8 X Comoros Africa 0 Congo Africa 1 Cook Islands Asia and the Pacific 0 Costa Rica Latin America and the Caribbean 4 Côte d'Ivoire Africa 4 X Croatia Europe and North America 8 Cuba Latin America and the Caribbean 9 Cyprus Europe and North America 3 X Czechia Europe and North America 12 X Democratic People's Republic of Korea Asia and the Pacific 2 Democratic Republic of the Congo Africa 5 Denmark Europe and North America 8 Djibouti Africa 0 Dominica Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Dominican Republic Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Ecuador Latin America and the Caribbean 5 X Egypt Arab States 7 El Salvador Latin America and the Caribbean 1 X Equatorial Guinea Africa 0 Eritrea Africa 0 Estonia Europe and North America 2 Ethiopia Africa 9 Fiji Asia and the Pacific 1 Number of WH Response State Party Region Properties received Finland * Europe and North America 7 France * Europe and North America 42 Gabon Africa 1 Gambia (the Africa 2 X Georgia Europe and North America 3 X Germany Europe and North America 41 X Ghana Africa 2 Greece Europe and North America 18 Grenada Latin America and the Caribbean 0 Guatemala Latin America and the Caribbean 3 Guinea Africa 1 Guinea-Bissau Africa 0 Guyana Latin America and the Caribbean 0 Haiti Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Holy See Europe and North America 2 Honduras Latin America and the Caribbean 2 Hungary Europe and North America 8 X Iceland Europe and North America 2 India Asia and the Pacific 35 Indonesia Asia and the Pacific 8 Iran (Islamic Republic of Asia and the Pacific 21 Iraq Arab States 5 X Ireland Europe and North America 2 X Israel Europe and North America 9 Italy Europe and North America 51 X Jamaica Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Japan Asia and the Pacific 20 X Jordan Arab States 5 Kazakhstan Asia and the Pacific 5 Kenya Africa 6 Kiribati Asia and the Pacific 1 Kuwait Arab States 0 Kyrgyzstan Asia and the Pacific 3 X Lao People's Democratic Republic Asia and the Pacific 2 Latvia Europe and North America 2 X Lebanon Arab States 5 Lesotho Africa 1 Liberia Africa 0 Libya Arab States 5 Lithuania Europe and North America 4 X Luxembourg Europe and North America 1 X Madagascar Africa 3 Malawi Africa 2 X Malaysia Asia and the Pacific 4 X Maldives Asia and the Pacific 0 Mali Africa 4 Malta Europe and North America 3 Marshall Islands Asia and the Pacific 1 Mauritania Arab States 2 Mauritius Africa 2 Mexico Latin America and the Caribbean 34 X Micronesia (Federated States of Asia and the Pacific 1 Monaco Europe and North America 0 Mongolia Asia and the Pacific 4 Montenegro Europe and North America 3 Morocco Arab States 9 X Mozambique Africa 1 Myanmar Asia and the Pacific 1 X Namibia Africa 2 X Nepal Asia and the Pacific 4 Number of WH Response State Party Region Properties received Netherlands Europe and North America 10 New Zealand Asia and the Pacific 3 X Nicaragua Latin America and the Caribbean 2 Niger Africa 3 Nigeria Africa 2 X Niue Asia and the Pacific 0 Norway Europe and North America 8 X Oman Arab States 4 Pakistan Asia and the Pacific 6 Palau Asia and the Pacific 1 Palestine Arab States 2 Panama Latin America and the Caribbean 5 Papua New Guinea Asia and the Pacific 1 Paraguay Latin America and the Caribbean 1 X Peru Latin America and the Caribbean 12 Philippines Asia and the Pacific 6 X Poland Europe and North America 14 X Portugal Europe and North America 15 X Qatar Arab States 1 X Republic of Korea Asia and the Pacific 12 Republic of Moldova Europe and North America 1 Romania Europe and North America 7 X Russian Federation Europe and North America 26 Rwanda Africa 0 Saint Kitts and Nevis Latin America and the Caribbean 1 Saint Lucia Latin America and the Caribbean 1 X Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Latin America and the Caribbean 0 Samoa Asia and the Pacific 0 San Marino Europe and North America 1 Sao Tome and Principe Africa 0 Saudi Arabia Arab States 4 X Senegal Africa 7 Serbia Europe and North America 5 Seychelles Africa 2 X Sierra Leone Africa 0 Singapore Asia and the Pacific 1 X Slovakia Europe and North America 7 X Slovenia Europe and North America 3 Solomon Islands Asia and the Pacific 1 South Africa Africa 8 South Sudan Africa 0 Spain * Europe and North America 45 Sri Lanka Asia and the Pacific 8 Sudan Arab States 3 Suriname Latin America and the Caribbean 2 Swaziland Africa 0 Sweden Europe and North America 15 X Switzerland Europe and North America 12 X Syrian Arab Republic Arab States 6 Tajikistan Asia and the Pacific 2 Thailand Asia and the Pacific 5 X the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Europe and North America 1 X Timor-Leste Asia and the Pacific 0 Togo Africa 1 X Tonga Asia and the Pacific 0 Trinidad and Tobago Latin America and the Caribbean 0 Tunisia Arab States 8 Turkey Europe and North America 16 X Turkmenistan Asia and the Pacific 3 Uganda Africa 3 X Number of WH Response State Party Region Properties received Ukraine Europe and North America 7 X United Arab Emirates Arab States 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Europe and North America 30 X United Republic of Tanzania Africa 7 X United States of America Europe and North America 23 X Uruguay Latin America and the Caribbean 2 Uzbekistan Asia and the Pacific 5 Vanuatu Asia and the Pacific 1 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of Latin America and the Caribbean 3 Viet Nam Asia and the Pacific 8 X Yemen Arab States 4 Zambia Africa 1 Zimbabwe Africa 5 * Retained communication received.
Recommended publications
  • Ukraine to Seek Special Partnership with NATO Youngest Canadian
    INSIDE:• Ukraine’s environment minister emphasizes G-7 promises — page 3. • The multiculturalism debate in Canada — page 8. • On the road to the Atlanta Games — page 9. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXIV HE KRAINIANNo. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 30, 1996 EEKLY$1.25/$2 in Ukraine T UParliament adopts ConstitutionW in marathon session Ukraine to seek by Marta Kolomayets Parliament declared Ukraine’s indepen- were met with robust laughter from the Kyiv Press Bureau dence on August 24, 1991. lawmakers, who though exhausted, were “Today, we proved we are Ukrainians. elated by the events of the day. special partnership KYIV — The Ukrainian Parliament Today we look so good compared to “But, this last event proved that we, in a adopted a new Constitution — a historic Russia. And, slowly but surely, we will critical moment, are worthy of being called moment for the five-year-old independent show the world who we are. They all the representatives of the Ukrainian peo- with NATO state — at 9:18 a.m. Friday, June 28, after by Marta Kolomayets think we are ruski [Russians],” said ple,” continued the Ukrainian president. an all-night intense marathon session in Kateryna Vashchuk, a deputy from the Kyiv Press Bureau Immediately after the vote, Chairman the halls of the legislature. Agrarians for Reforms faction. Moroz expressed his gratitude to all the KYIV — Apparently worried “We have a Constitution,” proclaimed President Leonid Kuchma attended the members of the Parliament — those who about Russia’s opposition to the east- Parliament Chairman Oleksander Moroz, final hour of the plenary session and wit- voted for and those who voted against — ward expansion of the North Atlantic after the deputies voted 315-36, with 12 nessed the vote on the Constitution, an for their commitment to Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nebraska Guide to Implementing New Federal Race and Ethnicity
    The Nebraska Department of Education Guide to Implementing New Federal Race and Ethnicity Categories for Students and Staff Adapted from a guide developed by the National Forum on Education Statistics February 2009 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Making the Case: Background and Rationale ······························································ 3 1.1 Leading Up to the Change ··········································································· 3 1.2 Let’s Get Started ······················································································ 5 1.3 A Suggested Implementation Sequence ···························································· 6 Exhibit 1.1 U.S. Department of Education’s Final Guidance At-A-Glance ···································· 7 Exhibit 1.2 A Comparison of Existing and New U.S. Department of Education ··························· 8 1.4 Setting the Stage: Developing Policies and Procedures ··········································· 9 Case Study: Surveying Ethnicity and Race, on Paper and Face-to-Face: ····································· 10 Chapter 2 Getting on the Same Page: Training and Communication ··············································· 11 2.1 Training and Communication ······································································ 11 Exhibit 2.1 Providing Advance Notice to the Public: An Example from Montgomery County (MD) Public Schools ································ 13 Exhibit 2.2 Sample Letter to Staff Members on Re-Identification ··········································· 15
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Selecting Race Ethnicity
    Selecting an Ethnicity If, in prior records, an individual has indicated that he or she was Hispanic, then the ethnicity question is answered. Your job is to observe and select a racial category. Many Hispanic individuals consider “Hispanic” as their race (partly due to past experience of using this as if it were a racial category). They may look for “Hispanic” or “some other race” in the race question. When they do not find it, they leave it blank. Following up might be all that is needed to collect the information directly from the student or parent. A student may volunteer his or her ancestry rather than answering “yes” to the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity question. The following is a list of Hispanic ancestry groups to which Hispanic individuals may refer themselves: Spaniard Andalusian Asturian Castillian Catalonian Balearic Islander Gallego Valencian Canary Islander Mexican Mexican American Mexicano Chicano La Raza Mexican American Indian Mexican State Costa Rican Guatemalan Honduran Nicaraguan Panamanian Salvadoran Central American Canal Zone Argentinean Bolivian Chilean Colombian Ecuadorian Paraguayan Peruvian Uruguayan Venezuelan Criollo South American Latin American Latino Puerto Rican Dominican Hispanic Spanish Californio Tejano Nuevo Mexicano Spanish American Selecting a Race In general, the new federal requirements conflate race and geographic/national origin. For example, “White” is defined to include people who originate from Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. Though not an exhaustive list, the following chart may help
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Country Classifications by Income Level 2021-2022.Xlsx
    World Bank list of economies (June 2021) Economy Code Region Income group Afghanistan AFG South Asia Low income Angola AGO Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Albania ALB Europe & Central Asia Upper middle income Argentina ARG Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Armenia ARM Europe & Central Asia Upper middle income American Samoa ASM East Asia & Pacific Upper middle income Azerbaijan AZE Europe & Central Asia Upper middle income Burundi BDI Sub‐Saharan Africa Low income Benin BEN Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Burkina Faso BFA Sub‐Saharan Africa Low income Bangladesh BGD South Asia Lower middle income Bulgaria BGR Europe & Central Asia Upper middle income Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH Europe & Central Asia Upper middle income Belarus BLR Europe & Central Asia Upper middle income Belize BLZ Latin America & Caribbean Lower middle income Bolivia BOL Latin America & Caribbean Lower middle income Brazil BRA Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Bhutan BTN South Asia Lower middle income Botswana BWA Sub‐Saharan Africa Upper middle income Central African Republic CAF Sub‐Saharan Africa Low income China CHN East Asia & Pacific Upper middle income Côte d'Ivoire CIV Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Cameroon CMR Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Congo, Dem. Rep. COD Sub‐Saharan Africa Low income Congo, Rep. COG Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Colombia COL Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Comoros COM Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Cabo Verde CPV Sub‐Saharan Africa Lower middle income Costa Rica CRI Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Cuba CUB Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Djibouti DJI Middle East & North Africa Lower middle income Dominica DMA Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Dominican Republic DOM Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Algeria DZA Middle East & North Africa Lower middle income Ecuador ECU Latin America & Caribbean Upper middle income Egypt, Arab Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • LARSON-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf
    THE NEW “OLD COUNTRY” THE KINGDOM OF YUGOSLAVIA AND THE CREATION OF A YUGOSLAV DIASPORA 1914-1951 BY ETHAN LARSON DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2020 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Maria Todorova, Chair Professor Peter Fritzsche Professor Diane Koenker Professor Ulf Brunnbauer, University of Regensburg ABSTRACT This dissertation reviews the Kingdom of Yugoslavia’s attempt to instill “Yugoslav” national consciousness in its overseas population of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, as well as resistance to that same project, collectively referred to as a “Yugoslav diaspora.” Diaspora is treated as constructed phenomenon based on a transnational network between individuals and organizations, both emigrant and otherwise. In examining Yugoslav overseas nation-building, this dissertation is interested in the mechanics of diasporic networks—what catalyzes their formation, what are the roles of international organizations, and how are they influenced by the political context in the host country. The life of Louis Adamic, who was a central figure within this emerging network, provides a framework for this monograph, which begins with his arrival in the United States in 1914 and ends with his death in 1951. Each chapter spans roughly five to ten years. Chapter One (1914-1924) deals with the initial encounter between Yugoslav diplomats and emigrants. Chapter Two (1924-1929) covers the beginnings of Yugoslav overseas nation-building. Chapter Three (1929-1934) covers Yugoslavia’s shift into a royal dictatorship and the corresponding effect on its emigration policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Groups and Library of Congress Subject Headings
    Ethnic Groups and Library of Congress Subject Headings Jeffre INTRODUCTION tricks for success in doing African studies research3. One of the challenges of studying ethnic Several sections of the article touch on subject head- groups is the abundant and changing terminology as- ings related to African studies. sociated with these groups and their study. This arti- Sanford Berman authored at least two works cle explains the Library of Congress subject headings about Library of Congress subject headings for ethnic (LCSH) that relate to ethnic groups, ethnology, and groups. His contentious 1991 article Things are ethnic diversity and how they are used in libraries. A seldom what they seem: Finding multicultural materi- database that uses a controlled vocabulary, such as als in library catalogs4 describes what he viewed as LCSH, can be invaluable when doing research on LCSH shortcomings at that time that related to ethnic ethnic groups, because it can help searchers conduct groups and to other aspects of multiculturalism. searches that are precise and comprehensive. Interestingly, this article notes an inequity in the use Keyword searching is an ineffective way of of the term God in subject headings. When referring conducting ethnic studies research because so many to the Christian God, there was no qualification by individual ethnic groups are known by so many differ- religion after the term. but for other religions there ent names. Take the Mohawk lndians for example. was. For example the heading God-History of They are also known as the Canienga Indians, the doctrines is a heading for Christian works, and God Caughnawaga Indians, the Kaniakehaka Indians, (Judaism)-History of doctrines for works on Juda- the Mohaqu Indians, the Saint Regis Indians, and ism.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Case for Open Borders
    A Radical Case for Open Borders The Economics of Immigration: Market-Based Approaches, Social Science, and Public Policy Benjamin Powell Print publication date: 2015 Print ISBN-13: 9780190258788 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2015 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190258788.001.0001 A Radical Case for Open Borders Bryan Caplan Vipul Naik DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190258788.003.0008 Abstract and Keywords This chapter argues that immigration policy should be reformed so that there are no quantitative caps on legal migration. It argues that a policy of open borders and free migration would create massive poverty reduction while helping to improve the lives of most of the native born, and that any adverse consequences could be made up for with “keyhole solutions” that leave massive migration flows intact while tweaking policy to deal with specific consequences. It provocatively argues that given the evidence surveyed in the earlier chapters, every major moral theory recommends open borders. Keywords: open borders, free migration, moral theory, keyhole solutions 1 Introduction Suppose you get laid off in Oklahoma.1 Local opportunities are sparse, so you find a job in California, rent a new place, and go. Voilà, your move is done. You need not get permission from a government official or convince anybody that your presence is a net positive for California.2 That’s because the member states of the United States have open borders. This chapter argues in favor of global open borders. In an open borders world, you don’t need permission to move from Lahore to London or Montreal to Mumbai any more than you need permission to move from Oklahoma to California.
    [Show full text]
  • Race and Ethnicity Data Collection Policy LEA Implementation Guide
    Race and Ethnicity Data Collection Policy LEA Implementation Guide Spring 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................3 TOPIC 1: OVERVIEW OF POLICY CHANGES ...........................................................................................4 1.1 Policy Overview ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Race and Ethnicity Data Collection Requirements under the New Policy .......................................... 4 1.3 A Comparison of Current and New Federal Race and Ethnicity Data Reporting Standards ............... 6 1.4 Why is OSSE Implementing this Policy Change? ................................................................................. 6 1.5 What is the Effective Date for the New Ethnicity and Race Collection Policy? .................................. 7 1.6 How Will This Policy Change Impact Student Enrollment Forms? ...................................................... 7 TOPIC 2: RE-IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS .....................................................................................7 2.1 Re-Identification Requirements for Returning Students .................................................................... 7 2.2 Re-Identification Requirements for Students that Participated in Pre-Enrollment ........................... 7 2.3 Re-Identification Requirements for Future School Years ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS (Bielarus)
    CLASSROOM COUNTRY PROFILES BELARUS (Bielarus) Belarus has been an independent nation since 1991. The term Belarus means “White Russia” and in the process of rising na- tionalism, Belarus is a relative latecomer. Located at low eleva- tion on a vast plain between Russia, Poland, Ukraine, and the Baltic states, Belarus features gradual change, geographically and culturally. Belarus has maintained fairly close ties to Russia in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse and has been dominated by one political leader, Alexander Lukashenko for over 20 years. The capital city of Minsk is located along the major trans- portation routes between Russia and Western Europe. Religion in Belarus is predominantly of the Eastern Orthodox Christian Population: 9.5 million variety. The two largest ethnic groups in the country, Belarusians and Area: 207,595 sq. km. (size of Kansas) Russians have been Orthodox in tradition for over a thousand years. The Capital: Minsk (2 million ) second largest religious affiliation is Roman Catholic, and represented Languages: Russian and Belarusian (official) primarily by the Polish minority. Belarus has no official state religion and both Catholic and Orthodox versions of Christmas and Easter are cele- brated by state holiday. Freedom of religion is protected by the Constitu- Belarusian education is regulated and run by the tion, however, the political nature of certain religious affiliations (for exam- state. It is unclear what the distinction between ple Catholicism and Poland) has led to the degradation of religious free- public and private institutions of higher learning is doms in recent years. In the aftermath of the atheist Soviet era, a large as both exist and yet all are strictly regulated in proportion of Belarusians (41%) are irreligious.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 164 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 2018 No. 116 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was As a mom, I am outraged. This ad- demand that the administration re- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- ministration is failing to comply with unite all separated children with their pore (Mr. MARSHALL). a court-ordered deadline. parents—not later, now. This is a court f But what is this really about, babies, order, not a suggestion. toddlers, and young children? Ask any If the problem is that these agencies DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO pediatrician. This is harmful, and are understaffed, I will come over to TEMPORE every day creates more harm to these the agency. I will go over to Health and The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- innocent children. Human Services to help. I am sure fore the House the following commu- This administration is saying they many of my colleagues will join me. nication from the Speaker: were forced to separate families when, Mr. Speaker, when the families are in fact, it was their deliberate zero-tol- reunited, our work is not done. We WASHINGTON, DC, must fix our broken immigration sys- July 11, 2018. erance policy, their strategy that forc- I hereby appoint the Honorable ROGER W. ibly took children out of their parents’ tem. It is long past time to vote on a MARSHALL to act as Speaker pro tempore on arms, and it has always been within comprehensive, humane, and compas- this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarusian Festivals & Exhibitions in New Jersey
    BELARUSIAN FESTIVALS & EXHIBITIONS IN NEW JERSEY Political InformationThrough The Language Of Art (1948-2011) Jan Zaprudnik Jan Zaprudnik BELARUSIAN FESTIVALS AND EXHIBITIONS IN NEW JERSEY Political Information Through the Language of Art (1948 – 2011) Янка Запруднік БЕЛАРУСКІЯ ФЭСТЫВАЛІ Й ВЫСТАЎКІ Ў НЬЮ ДЖЭРЗІ Палітычная інфармацыя моваю мастацтва (1948 – 2011 гг.) Belarusian Institute of Arts and Sciences New York, 2013 Беларускі Інстытут Навукі й Мастацтва Нью Ёрк, 2013 Belarusian Festivals in New Jersey (1948-2011) Copyright © 2013 by the Belarusian Institute of Arts and Sciences. 330 Park Street, Haworth, NJ 07641 Copyright © 2013 by Irene and Nicholas Dutko Cover by Irene Dutko. Formatting by Nicholas Dutko, layout and design by Irene Dutko. ISBN 0-9722020-1-3 Zaprudnik Jan (1926 - ) Belarusian Festivals and Exhibitions in New Jersey: Political Information Through the Language of Art (1948–2011).Somerset, NJ, 2013. XVIII + 192. Illustrations, Footnotes, Index of Names, For Further Reading. Text in English: V-VIII, XIII-XIV, 1-78, 178-179, 182-185 192. Text in Belarusian: IX-XII, XV-XVII, 79-177, 180-181, 186-191, 193. Printed by Top Shelf Printing & Envelopes, LLC, 50-2 Tannery Road, Branchburg, NJ 08876. 1000 copies. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, on paper or electronically, without permission in writing from the publisher. NOTE ON THE INSTITUTE’S SEAL (previous page and below). It bears an image of Francišak (Frantsisk) Skaryna (c. 1485-1551?), a scholar born in the city of Polatsk, Belarus. In 1517-1519, Skaryna published in Prague an annotat- ed translation of the Old Testament into medieval Belarusian.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of David J. Kramer Executive Director of Freedom
    Testimony of David J. Kramer Executive Director of Freedom House before the United States Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs “Crackdown on Belarus: Responding to the Lukashenka Regime” January 27, 2011 Madame Chairwoman, Members of the Committee, it is an honor to appear before you here today to discuss the latest situation in Belarus, and I commend you for holding today’s session. It is vitally important that the United States and Europe stay focused on the deteriorating situation in Belarus, support those in desperate need of assistance, and take decisive steps in response to the latest assault on freedom committed by Europe’s last dictator, Aleksandr Lukashenka. In just four days, European Union (EU) foreign ministers will meet and, I hope, vote to reimpose a visa ban and other sanctions against the Lukashenka regime. Frankly, anything short of that is unacceptable and would constitute a slap in the face to those victims of Lukashenka’s repression. It would also send a signal to authoritarian regimes around the world that they can get away with massive human rights abuses cost-free. Five years ago, in response to Belarus’ previous fraudulent presidential election, human rights abuses, and corruption, the United States and EU together imposed sanctions against the Lukashenka regime. Over time, those sanctions – i.e., not engagement but pressure -- secured the release of political prisoners held in Lukashenka’s prisons. Engaging Lukashenka Has Failed Unfortunately, after the EU in particular eased its sanctions against the Lukashenka regime in October 2008 (the U.S. kept most of its sanctions in place) and launched an engagement strategy with Minsk, the pressure on Lukashenka went away, and he masterfully played the West and Russia off of each other.
    [Show full text]