London Hotel Development Monitor May 2005
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date
planning report D&P/3147/01 5 March 2014 100 Whitechapel Road Land and Building Fronting Fieldgate Street & Vine Court, London, E1 1JG in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning application no. PA/13/03049 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Demolition of existing vehicle workshop and erection of extension to the prayer hall at the East London Mosque, residential development comprising 241 open market and affordable housing units including studio, one, two, three and four bedroom apartments in buildings up to 18 storeys, basement parking, public realm improvements, pedestrian link from Fieldgate Street to Whitechapel Road. The applicant The applicant is Alyjiso and Fieldgate Ltd. and the architect is Webb Gray. Strategic issues The development of this mixed-use scheme accommodates both the extension of the East London Mosque and residential uses on a constrained site within the City Fringe Opportunity Area. The proposal is broadly in accordance with strategic planning policy, and is supported. However, further discussion is required regarding housing quality, children’s play space provision, inclusive design, sustainability and transport. Recommendation That Tower Hamlets Council be advised that while the application is generally acceptable in strategic planning terms the application does not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 86 of this report; but that the possible remedies set out in this paragraph could address these deficiencies. Context 1 On the 20 January 2014 the Mayor of London received documents from Tower Hamlets Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. -
Davenant Foundation School Foundation School
DAVENANT DAVENANT FOUNDATION SCHOOL FOUNDATION SCHOOL Chester Road, Loughton, Essex IG10 2LD. Telephone: 020 8508 0404 Facsimile: 020 8508 9301 E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @DavenantFS @Davenant6thform “a community based firmly on Christian principles” Ofsted “parental commitment and support are significant factors in the school’s success” Ofsted “the school’s extra curricular provision is particularly strong” Ofsted www.davenantschool.co.uk Nurturing Mind, Body and Spirit Produced by: The School Brochure Specialist, FM Litho Design and Print. Tel: 01787 479479 • [email protected] • www.fmlitho.co.uk DAVENANT “a Christian school valuing the past with a vision of the future” It has been over fifty years since Davenant moved from Whitechapel to our present site, here in Loughton. The school has grown to be a highly regarded, Christian ecumenical school achieving excellent results for students of all abilities. Students, staff and the wider community work very hard to make Davenant a successful school. We see ourselves as a community that promotes individual excellence and nurtures the God given potential within each of us. Our ethos is based firmly on the commitment to “nurture mind, body and spirit” and, therefore, we work hard to ensure each student not only achieves their academic potential but also has a range of opportunities to be enriched and to enjoy new experiences away from the classroom. Also, Davenant is highly regarded for the work done in training and developing teachers so that our students receive the high quality teaching they deserve. Our expectations of each other are high. We demand a great deal of our students-hard work, the desire to learn, a determination to succeed and a willingness to contribute fully to the life of the school. -
SAVED by the BELL ! the RESURRECTION of the WHITECHAPEL BELL FOUNDRY a Proposal by Factum Foundation & the United Kingdom Historic Building Preservation Trust
SAVED BY THE BELL ! THE RESURRECTION OF THE WHITECHAPEL BELL FOUNDRY a proposal by Factum Foundation & The United Kingdom Historic Building Preservation Trust Prepared by Skene Catling de la Peña June 2018 Robeson House, 10a Newton Road, London W2 5LS Plaques on the wall above the old blacksmith’s shop, honouring the lives of foundry workers over the centuries. Their bells still ring out through London. A final board now reads, “Whitechapel Bell Foundry, 1570-2017”. Memorial plaques in the Bell Foundry workshop honouring former workers. Cover: Whitechapel Bell Foundry Courtyard, 2016. Photograph by John Claridge. Back Cover: Chains in the Whitechapel Bell Foundry, 2016. Photograph by John Claridge. CONTENTS Overview – Executive Summary 5 Introduction 7 1 A Brief History of the Bell Foundry in Whitechapel 9 2 The Whitechapel Bell Foundry – Summary of the Situation 11 3 The Partners: UKHBPT and Factum Foundation 12 3 . 1 The United Kingdom Historic Building Preservation Trust (UKHBPT) 12 3 . 2 Factum Foundation 13 4 A 21st Century Bell Foundry 15 4 .1 Scanning and Input Methods 19 4 . 2 Output Methods 19 4 . 3 Statements by Participating Foundrymen 21 4 . 3 . 1 Nigel Taylor of WBF – The Future of the Whitechapel Bell Foundry 21 4 . 3 . 2 . Andrew Lacey – Centre for the Study of Historical Casting Techniques 23 4 . 4 Digital Restoration 25 4 . 5 Archive for Campanology 25 4 . 6 Projects for the Whitechapel Bell Foundry 27 5 Architectural Approach 28 5 .1 Architectural Approach to the Resurrection of the Bell Foundry in Whitechapel – Introduction 28 5 . 2 Architects – Practice Profiles: 29 Skene Catling de la Peña 29 Purcell Architects 30 5 . -
13-20 Settles Street
13-20 SETTLES STREET WHITECHAPEL, LONDON E1 Freehold refurbishment opportunity 1 13–20 SETTLES STREET PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE A RARE FREEHOLD PROPERTY IN AN AREA EXPERIENCING EXTRAORDINARY GROWTH. TO THE WEST ALDGATE IS BEING TRANSFORMED, TO THE NORTH THE TECH SECTOR EXPANDS FROM SHOREDITCH, AND TO THE EAST WHITECHAPEL WILL RECEIVE CROSSRAIL – JUST TWO MINUTES JOURNEY TIME FROM BOTH CANARY WHARF AND LIVERPOOL STREET. 2 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Freehold • A distinctive 1930s neo-Georgian property within the Whitechapel vision area • Excellent transport connectivity being approximately 500m from Whitechapel and Aldgate East Underground stations • The existing building comprises a net internal area of 17,107 sq ft (1,589 sq m) of office and ancillary accommodation arranged over lower ground, ground and one upper floor • Single let on an FRI lease to Trillium for Department of Work and Pensions at a rent of £150,000 per annum, expiring 1st April 2018 • The building has planning consent for a comprehensive refurbishment and addition of 3 further floors, with a proposed net internal area of 22,682 sq ft (2,107 sq m), and a change of planning use from A2 to B1 (offices) • Offers are invited in excess of £7,000,000, subject to contract and exclusive of VAT • A purchase at the level reflects a low capital value of £409 per sq ft on the existing accommodation and £308 per sq ft on the consented scheme 1 2 THE SHARD THE CITY OF LONDON TOWER OF LONDON ALDGATE ST KATHARINE DOCKS STATION BRICK LANE GOODMAN’S FIELDS SPITALFIELDS MARKET TOWER HILL STATION ALDGATE EAST STATION WHITECHAPEL STATION ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL 3 4 LOCAL AREA Aldgate and Whitechapel are evolving to become an integral part of London’s Tech Belt. -
Capital Grant Release from the Whitechapel High Street Fund To
Commissioner Decision Report 24 May 2016 Report of: Classification: Aman Dalvi Unrestricted Corporate Director, Development and Renewal Report Title: Whitechapel High Street Fund as grant to London Small Business Centre to deliver capital refurbishment and accessible workspace at 206 Whitechapel Road (SITE 2) Originating Officer(s) Duncan Brown, Strategic Project Manager, Whitechapel Delivery Team Wards affected Whitechapel, Stepney Green, Spitalfields-and-Banglatown, Bethnal Green Key Decision? Yes Community Plan Theme A great place to live; A fair and prosperous community; A safe and cohesive community EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In July 2015, the Council entered into a jointly sponsored funding agreement known as the Whitechapel High Street Fund (WHSF) with the Greater London Authority (GLA) valued at £1.123 million to be spent in the geographical boundary of the Whitechapel Vision Masterplan SPD area by April 2017. The agreement consists of £520,000 awarded by the GLA matched by a £603,000 contribution from the Council (LBTH). Of this funding, £725,000 is allocated as capital funding for the refurbishment and reuse of vacant and underused spaces in order to contribute towards the delivery of workspace within the Whitechapel area. Of the £725,000 amount, the Council has until 30th September 2016 to allocate approximately £400,000 of unspent GLA match funding towards capital projects, or it must return these monies back to the GLA. Therefore timescales are critical to project spend being delivered within this timeframe. Following a six month pre-qualified site selection process (Call for Spaces) that commenced in September 2015 and bid selection process (Call for Bids) thereafter, this report recommends funding be released against SITE 2 (Royal Mail Group owned vacant unit at 206 Whitechapel Road) from the Whitechapel High Street Fund as grant directly towards the London Small Business Centre, to procure and deliver refurbishment works to enable new accessible workspace provision. -
Whitechapel Station Environmental Statement
Whitechapel Station Environmental Statement Non-technical Summary Contents Background to Crossrail 1 About this Document 1 Crossrail at Whitechapel 2 Existing Situation 2 The Scheme 3 Other Works at Whitechapel 7 Constructing Crossrail 8 Alternatives 9 Assessment of Environmental Impacts 10 Townscape and Built Heritage 10 Visual Amenity 10 Archaeology 11 Ecology 11 Water Resources 11 Traffic and Transport 12 Noise and Vibration 13 Air Quality 13 Contaminated Land 14 Community 14 Socio-economics 14 Cumulative Impacts 15 What Happens Next? 16 Conceptual visualisation of new Whitechapel Station Background to Crossrail About this Document Crossrail is a major railway development, connecting Maidenhead A new design has been developed for Whitechapel Station since the through central London to Shenfield and Abbey Wood. The railway publication of the Crossrail ES (2005). An Environmental Impact will also connect Heathrow Airport, the West End, central London, Assessment (EIA) has been completed for these design changes and including Whitechapel Station and Canary Wharf. an ES has been produced. In order to gain approval to build and operate the new railway, EIA is a process used at an early stage in planning and design to The Crossrail Bill was submitted to Parliament together with predict the environmental impacts of a development. It can be used to an Environmental Statement (ES) in 2005 that assessed the find ways to reduce any adverse impacts, shape projects to fit into the environmental impacts of works required for the Crossrail project. The local environment and maximise environmental benefits which could Crossrail Bill received Royal Assent and became The Crossrail Act in be created. -
DC120/034 7.5 Committee
Committee: Date: Classification: Report Number: Agenda Item No: Development 17 March 2004 Unrestricted DC120/034 7.5 Committee Report of: Title: Town Planning Application Director of Customer Services Location: HERTSMERE HOUSE 2 HERTSMERE Case Officer: Simon Dunn-Lwin ROAD, LONDON, E14 4A (Columbus Tower) Ward: Millwall 1. SUMMARY 1.1 Registration Details Reference No: PA/03/00475 PA/03/00878 Date Received: 31/03/2003 Last Amended 31/03/2003 Date: 1.2 Application Details Existing Use: Office building occupied by Barclays and Morgan Stanley. Proposal: Demolition of existing building and erection of a 63 storey tower for office (B1), hotel and serviced apartments (C1 and sui generis), retail (A1/A2/A3) and leisure (D2) uses, with basement car parking and servicing. Applicant: SKMC & Farnham Properties Ltd Ownership: Barclays Bank PLC. Historic Building: N/A – adjacent to Grade II listed buildings on West India Quay, Grade I listed buildings known as Cannon Workshops, Grade I listed Dock Edge and Dock Wall. Conservation Area: Bordering West India Dock Conservation Area 2. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Development Committee grant planning permission, subject to the satisfactory completion of a legal agreement pursuant to Section 106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (and other appropriate powers) to include the matters outlined in Section 2.5 below; the conditions and informatives outlined in sections 2.6 and 2.7 below; and 5.1(22) relating to the OPDM Circular 1/2003. 2.2 That if the Committee resolve that planning permission be granted, that the application first be referred to the Mayor of London pursuant to the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2000, as an application for a new building exceeding 30 metres in height. -
Liberty of the Mint Conservation Appraisal
The Liberty of The Mint Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan (Adopted Nov 2018) www.southwark.gov.uk 2 Liberty of the Mint Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Section 1: Introduction Location, topography, planning history, further information…………………...………………………………………………………………….5 Liberty of the Mint CA map (figure 1)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Section 2: History Historic background, Roman, medieval, post medieval, Post medieval to present day……………………………………………………… 7 Section 3: Appraisal and assessment Townscape and character assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Map of feature of special interest (figure 5) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 Character and appearance, special interest and significance……………………………………………………………………………………12 Character areas— .Marshalsea Road, Borough High Street, Sudrey Street and Bittern Street……………………………………………...13 Toulmin Street………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14 Lant Street/Weller Street/Mint Street ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16 85-91 Mint Street ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...17 Section 4: Audit Scheduled monuments, Listed Buildings and Key Unlisted Buildings…………………………………………………………………………...18 Section 5: Management and development guidelines Purpose ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...19 Development form and urban morphology, Height and scale, Public realm, Environmental improvements ………………………………..20 Boundaries, Trees and street furniture, Improvements and repairs, -
The Isle of Dogs: Four Development Waves, Five Planning Models, Twelve
Progress in Planning 71 (2009) 87–151 www.elsevier.com/locate/pplann The Isle of Dogs: Four development waves, five planning models, twelve plans, thirty-five years, and a renaissance ... of sorts Matthew Carmona * The Bartlett School of Planning, UCL, 22 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0QB, United Kingdom Abstract The story of the redevelopment of the Isle of Dogs in London’s Docklands is one that has only partially been told. Most professional and academic interest in the area ceased following the property crash of the early 1990s, when the demise of Olympia & York, developers of Canary Wharf, seemed to bear out many contemporary critiques. Yet the market bounced back, and so did Canary Wharf, with increasingly profound impacts on the rest of the Island. This paper takes an explicitly historical approach using contemporaneous professional critiques and more reflective academic accounts of the planning and development of the Isle of Dogs to examine whether we can now conclude that an urban renaissance has taken place in this part of London. An extensive review of the literature is supplemented with analysis of physical change on the ground and by analysis of the range of relevant plans and policy documents that have been produced to guide development over the 35-year period since the regeneration began. The paper asks: What forms of planning have we seen on the Island; what role has design played in these; what outcomes have resulted from these processes; and, as a result, have we yet seen an urban renaissance? # 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Isle of Dogs; Urban design; Planning; Urban renaissance Contents 1. -
87443A97-00Ae-46B5-B643-56B6cf5751c7-27.Pdf
OUR STORY STARTS HERE 4 — 11 LOCATION 12 — 25 ARCHITECTURE 26 — 35 AMENITIES 36 — 49 INTERIORS 50 — 67 MATERIALS & SPECIFICATION 68 — 75 SITE OVERVIEW 76 — 77 BARRATT LONDON 78 — 79 OUR STORY STARTS HERE 5 | 6 OUR STORY STARTS HERE. IN AROUND AD 43, ON THE RIVERSIDE BETWEEN BLACKFRIARS AND TOWER HILL, THE ROMANS ESTABLISHED LONDINIUM. TWO THOUSAND YEARS LATER, LONDON’S ROMAN ORIGINS LIE DEEP BENEATH ITS STREETS, BUT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THAT FIRST SETTLEMENT, ON THE BANKS OF THE THAMES, LIES LANDMARK PLACE, LONDON’S ORIGINAL ADDRESS. COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY LANDMARK PLACE IS A BUILDING OF SUBSTANCE: ELEGANT, REFINED, AND ENTIRELY SUITED TO ITS ICONIC POSITION. A LANDMARK IN DESIGN, IN LOCATION, AND IN LONDON’S CONTINUING STORY. COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY OUR STORY STARTS HERE THE CITY’S RIVERSIDE For millennia, ships have sailed for London’s north shore, bringing goods from the furthest corners of the known world. Around this quay, the modern City has grown and flourished, a global capital, its landmarks clustered about its ancient core. 11 | 12 COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY LOCATION FIRST LIGHT. THE DAY BEFORE YOU, HISTORY JUST BENEATH YOUR FEET. 15 | 16 THE FIRST CITY OF LONDON Two thousand years ago, at a strategic Thames crossing, Britannia’s most important city was founded. Within seven years of the Roman invasion of AD 43, Londinium was established around a strategic crossing point with deep water access to the Thames’ north bank, now the heart of the modern City. The new settlement swiftly became a major trading post, the centre of the road network of the new Roman province of Britannia. -
Introduction Sir Frederick Treves (1853-1923) Joseph Carey Merrick
in 1923. in even through ill health until her death in 1919. in death her until health ill through even reminiscences of Joseph published shortly before his death death his before shortly published Joseph of reminiscences with improved accommodation. She remained as Matron Matron as remained She accommodation. improved with science. in 1908 and wrote popular travel literature as well as his his as well as literature travel popular wrote and 1908 in in 1895, and ensured that the nursing staff were provided provided were staff nursing the that ensured and 1895, in medical of benefit the for Act Anatomy the of terms the operated on Edward VII before his coronation. He retired retired He coronation. his before VII Edward on operated Nursing Institution in 1885, the Preliminary Training School School Training Preliminary the 1885, in Institution Nursing under College Medical the by preserved was skeleton His in the Boer War with his own surgical unit and famously famously and unit surgical own his with War Boer the in the examination. Eva Lückes established the Private Private the established Lückes Eva examination. the 1890. in death his until there resident a remained and www.qmul.ac.uk/publicengagement pioneered the operation to remove the appendix. He served served He appendix. the remove to operation the pioneered to complete two years of training with another year following following year another with training of years two complete to hospital the by in taken was He savings. his of robbed by the Centre for Public Engagement. Engagement. Public for Centre the by published many important works on surgery and anatomy anatomy and surgery on works important many published nursing at the hospital. -
September 2009 1 COLUMBUS TOWER
COLUMBUS TOWER DEVELOPMENT, 2 HERTSMERE ROAD, LONDON, E14 4AB REVIEW OF DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING EFFECTS Prepared on behalf of the Greater London Authority September 2009 1 Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL Offices also in T 020 7837 4477 Cardiff F 020 7837 2277 Manchester Newcastle upon Tyne [email protected] www.nlpplanning.com COLUMBUS TOWER DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT REVIEW Executive Summary 1.1 This report reviews the Gordon Ingram Associates (GIA) Daylight and Sunlight Assessment and supplementary information submitted in support of the planning application for the Columbus Tower development at No. 2 Hertsmere Road, London E14 4AB (LBTH Ref. No. PA/08/02709). The review has been prepared on behalf of the Greater London Authority to assist the Mayor of London in determining the application. It considers the acceptability of the scope of the assessment, the accuracy of the daylight and sunlight modelling and results and the validity of the conclusions drawn. It also provides a commentary on the London Borough of Tower Hamlets determination of the application in terms of daylight and sunlight matters. 1.2 The review confirms that the scope of the assessment is appropriate in terms of the neighbouring properties and areas of amenity space assessed. The methodology and significance criteria employed in the assessment are also considered generally acceptable. 1.3 Comparison daylight and sunlight plots have been undertaken to verify the accuracy and precision of the data on which the assessment is based. The calculations corroborate the accuracy of GIA’s daylight and sunlight modelling and the validity of the assessment results.