Genesis Mishap Investigation Board Report, Volume I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genesis Mishap Investigation Board Report, Volume I GENESIS MISHAP INVESTIGATION BOARD REPORT VOLUME I National Aeronautics and Space Administration Trade names or manufacturers’ names are used in this report for identification only. This usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. GENESIS MISHAP REPORT VOLUME I G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE PB PAGE I G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE ii PAGE iii G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE ii PAGE iii G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE iv PAGE V G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE iv PAGE V G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE ii PAGE iii G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T VOLUME I CONTENTS Signature Page (Board Members) ........................................................................v Advisors, Consultants, and JPL Failure Review Board Members .................... vii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................ix Executive Summary .............................................................................................1 1. Summary of Genesis Project .........................................................................5 2. Mishap Description -- Sequence of Events and Timeline ...........................16 3. Method of Investigation ..............................................................................18 4. Proximate Cause ..........................................................................................23 5. Root Causes and Contributing Factors ........................................................28 6. Recommendations .......................................................................................41 7. Other Observations and Recommendations ................................................52 8. Stardust Mission Recommendations ...........................................................59 9. Nomenclature and Dictionary .....................................................................65 10. References ...................................................................................................81 Appendices: Appendix A: Letter Establishing the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board ......................................... A-1 Appendix B: Genesis Project Description, narrative ........................................B-5 Appendix C: Fault Tree: Process and Diagram .............................................C-21 Appendix D: Analyses and Studies ............................................................... D-29 Appendix E: Root Cause and Contributing Factor Narrative; Event and Causal Factor Tree .................................................E-209 Appendix F: JPL Failure Review Board Report ........................................... F-259 Appendix G: Contractors Supporting the Genesis MIB .............................. G-261 Appendix H: Meeting Minutes .................................................................... H-263 Appendix I: Press Releases ............................................................................I-323 Appendix J: Bibliography ..............................................................................J-333 G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE ii PAGE iii G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE iv PAGE V G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T SIGNATURE PAGE (BOARD MEmbERS) Dr. Michael Ryschkewitsch, Chairman Patricia Jones Director, Applied Engineering & Technology Human Factors Directorate NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD Steven Labbe Aerodynamics Peter Spidaliere NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Executive Secretary NASA Johnson Space Flight Center, Houston, TX Melvin Lucy Senior Engineer, Systems Engineering Directorate Patrick Martin NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Ex-Officio Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC Stacey Nakamura Chief, Safety & Test Operations Division NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Frank Bauer Systems Engineering NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD John Ormsby Avionics NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Col. Michael Coolidge Air Force Space Command Department of Defense Jenny Stein Parachute Systems Exploration Systems Engineering Division Marlon Enciso NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Head, Electrical Systems Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD James VanLaak Systems Engineering NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Thomas Gates Materials/Structures NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Maj., (USAF Retired) Melba Weatherford Headquarters Air Force Safety Center Department of Defense G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE iv PAGE V G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE vi PAGE vii G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T ADviSORS AND CONSULTANTS Mishap Investigation Board Advisors: Clint Crookshanks National Transportation Safety Board Robert Kichak Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD Karen McNamara Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Catherine White Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Mishap Investigation Board Consultants: Lt. Gen. Edward Berry USAF, Retired Dennis Deel Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Denver, CO Charles Holloway Dynacs MDI Yvonne Kellogg Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA John Kline Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA Patrick O’Rear Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Nicholas Smith Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Denver, CO Donald Sweetnam Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA Joseph Vellinga Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Denver, CO Ronald Zellar Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC: Debbie Hollebeke Legislative Affairs Don Savage Public Affairs Daniel Thomas Legal Advisor Robert Tucker External Relations G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE vi PAGE vii G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T JPL Failure Review Board Dr. John Klein Management /Power Systems JPL/Chair Rob Manning Systems JPL/Deputy Chair Arden Acord “System Test, V&V” JPL Kirk Barrow Mission Assurance JPL Ed Barry Project Management USAF Ret. Steven Battel Space Engineering Private Consultant Jerry Dalton Electronics Reliability /Circuit Analysis JPL Jim Donaldson Avionics Systems JPL Wayne Lee Entry Systems JPL Dave Perkins Systems LMSS Tom Rivellini Mechanical Systems JPL Joe Savino Avionics and Power Systems JPL Rao Surampudi Batteries JPL Mark Underwood Battery/Power Systems JPL JPL Failure Review Boad Support Team George Carlisle Navigation JPL Genesis Navigation Prasun Desai Entry Systems LaRC Genesis Ed Hirst Systems Engineering JPL Genesis Mission Manager Bob Kerr Process Engineering JPL George Lewis Navigation JPL Genesis Navigation Nora Mainland Ops/Data Control JPL Genesis MOS Bob Mitcheltree Entry/Descent Systems JPL Tom Spilker Physics JPL Genesis Don Sweetnum JPL Genesis Project Manager Christine Szalai Entry/Descent Systems JPL Tom Wahl Systems Engineering JPL Genesis Bill Wilcockson Entry Systems LMSS Other JPL and LMSS Contacts Robert Berry LMSS Management LMSS Jim Crocker LMSS Management LMSS Gentry Lee Guru JPL David Perkins Genesis Engineering LMSS Mark Underwood Batteries JPL Joe Vellinga Genesis Project LMSS G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T PAGE viii PAGE I X G ENES I S M I SHA P R E P O R T ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Mishap Investigation Board would like to acknowledge the support of a num- ber of groups and individuals who contributed to completing the investigation in an effective and timely manner. A special commendation goes to the Genesis Project Team who functioned as an Interim Response Team in performing the initial recovery and securing of the crashed sample return capsule. Their timely and quality response not only pre- served the critical hardware for MIB examination but more importantly, provided the opportunity for the Mission Curation and Science Teams to preserve and pro- cess the scientific samples. Recent reports indicate that most or all of the science goals of the mission will be achieved. In addition, early collection of detailed notes from each member present at the crash site were invaluable in reconstructing the post-recovery timelines. The MIB received exemplary support from many members of the Genesis Project Team from Lockheed Martin Space Systems and from the Jet Propulsion Lab. The personnel from both organizations and their respective line management coop- erated fully and proactively supported the MIB in doing its work. It was clear that everyone on both teams had been strongly personally committed to achieving Genesis mission success and that the crash was a strong personal blow to each one. Each and every team member contacted by the MIB was completely open and tried in every way to help reconstruct events over the life of the Genesis mission. It was clear that people involved felt personally responsible for the failures but, despite significant emotional stress, participated with a high degree of professionalism. Of special mention are Joe Villenga, Nick Smith, Dave Perkins and Al McKinney of LMSS and Don Sweetnam, Tom Wahl and Ed Hirst of JPL. Each of these people did everything possible to help the Board and in every way worked to make sure that the best possible knowledge was gained from the investigation. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory convened an internal Failure Review Board
Recommended publications
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • TOUR DE FER 20 Colour: Greens of the Stone Age / Weight: 14.80Kg
    TOUR DE FER 20 Colour: Greens Of The Stone Age / Weight: 14.80Kg SPECS Frame Reynolds 725 Heat-Treated Chromoly FEATURES Fork Genesis Full Chromoly - Reynolds 725 CrMo tubeset. Headset PT-1770 EC34 Upper / EC34 Lower - Shimano 3x10 speed drivetrain. Hanger Integraded - Shimano dynamo hub with B&M lights. COMPONENTS - Schwalbe Marathon touring tyres. Handlebars Genesis Alloy 18mm Rise, 8 Deg Backsweep, XS = 580mm, S/M = 600mm, L/XL = 620mm - Mudguards included. Stem Genesis Alloy, 31.8mm, -6 Deg, 100mm - Tubus rear rack, Atranvelo front rack. Grips/Tape Genesis Vexgel Saddle Genesis Adventure Seatpost Genesis Alloy 27.2mm XS/S/M = 350mm, L/XL = 400mm Pedals NW-99k With Cage DRIVE TRAIN Shifters Shimano Deore SL-M6000 3x10spd GEOMETRY XS S M L XL Rear Derailleur Shimano Deore RD-M6000-SGS Seat Tube 450 480 510 530 570 Front Derailleur Shimano Deore FD-T6000-L-3 Top Tube 533 547 578 604 636 Chainset Shimano FC-T611 44/32/24t, 170mm Frame Reach 365 375 395 415 435 BB Shimano BB-ES300 Frame Stack 566 580 599 618 637 Chain KMC X10 Head Tube 125 140 160 180 200 Cassette Shimano CS-HG500 11-34t Head Angle 71 71 71 71 71 BRAKES Seat Angle 73.5 73.5 73 73 72.5 Brakes Promax DSK-717RA Chainstay 455 455 455 455 455 Brake Levers Promax XL-91 BB Drop 75 75 75 75 75 Rotors Promax DT-160G, 160mm, 6 bolt Wheelbase 1041 1056 1083 1109 1136 WHEELS & TYRES Fork Offset 55 55 55 55 55 Rims Sun Ringle Rhyno Lite Standover 758 778 799 807 843 Hubs Shimano Front - DH-3D37 Dynamo Hub / Rear - FH-M4050 Stem 100 100 100 100 100 Spokes Steel 14g Handlebar 580 600 600 620 620 Tyres Schwalbe Marathon, 700 x 37c Crankarm 170 170 170 170 170 * The image above is for illustration purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 GV80 Getting Started Guide
    GETTING STARTED GUIDE GENESIS GV80 GETTING STARTED GUIDE AUDIO, CONNECTIVITY, AND NAVIGATION Thank you for joining the Genesis family. This easy-to-follow guide will show you how to use various Genesis GV80 features and how to adjust their settings to your preferences. We hope you enjoy the distinctive luxury of a customized and convenient ownership experience. TABLE OF CONTENTS PHONE PROJECTION 3 PHONE PAIRING 4 CUSTOM BUTTON 6 MAKING A CALL 7 NAVIGATION 10 DYNAMIC VOICE Recognition 13 Dual VOICE Recognition 14 MAP DISPLAYS 15 Advanced DRIVER Assistance SYstems 17 Main menu PHONE PROJECTION Android AutoTM and Apple CarPlay® allow you to access the most commonly used smartphone features, including calling, navigation, text messaging, and playing music all from your driver’s seat. 1. ‘Connect’ a USB data cable from your phone to the vehicle’s USB port.* Android Auto APPLE CARPLAY 2. ‘Allow permission’ from your phone to connect to your vehicle. Please note that your phone must be unlocked. Android Auto APPLE CARPLAY 3. Enjoy using the applications displayed on your vehicle’s multimedia screen. Android Auto APPLE CARPLAY Note Android Auto users will be prompted to view a tutorial. Select your option and proceed. *USB data port will typically be located in or near the front in-dash console. Check your vehicle’s owner’s manual for specific location. Data cable for iOS device is required for Apple CarPlay. OEM data cables are recommended. Apple CarPlay is a registered trademark of Apple Inc. Android Auto is a trademark of Google LLC. 3 ONLINE RESOURCES AND INFORMATION AT MYGENESIS.COM Main menu PHONE PAIRING 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Modèle Document
    AVISO DT CorSSH and DT SLA Product Handbook Reference: CLS-DOS-NT-08.341 Nomenclature: - Issue: 2 rev 0 Date: October 2012 Aviso Altimetry 8-10 rue Hermès, 31520 Ramonville St Agne, France – [email protected] DT CorSSH and DT SLA Product Handbook CLS-DOS-NT-08.341 Iss :2.9 - date : 28/02/2012 - Nomenclature: - i.1 Chronology Issues: Issue: Date: Reason for change: 1.0 2005/07/18 1st issue 1.1 2005/11/08 Processing of ERS-2 data 1.2 2005/10/17 Processing of GFO data 1.3 2008/06/10 New standards for corrections and models for Jason-1 1.4 2008/08/07 New standards for corrections and models for Envisat after cycle 65. 1.5 2008/12/18 New standards for corrections and models for Jason-1 GDR-C. 1.6 2010/03/05 New standards for Jason-2 1.7 2010/06/08 New standards for corrections and/or models Processing of ERS-1 data 1.8 2011/04/14 Correction of table 2 1.9 2012/02/28 Specification of the reading routines for SLA files only 2.0 2012/10/16 New geodetic orbit for Jason-1 (c≥500) New version D for Jason-2 (c≥146) D : page deleted I : page inserted M : page modified DT CorSSH and DT SLA Product Handbook CLS-DOS-NT-08.341 Iss :2.9 - date : 28/02/2012 - Nomenclature: - i.2 List of Acronyms: ATP Along Track Product Aviso Archiving, Validation and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic data Cersat Centre ERS d’Archivage et de Traitement CLS Collecte, Localisation, Satellites CMA Centre Multimissions Altimetriques Cnes Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales CorSSH Corrected Sea Surface Height Doris Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Radiation Environment
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070014073 2019-08-30T00:44:36+00:00Z 1 Source of Acquisition NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Genesis Radiation Environment Joseph I. Minow* NASA Marshull Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA Richard L. Altstatt' and William C. Skipworth* Jacobs Engineering, Marshall Space Flight Center Group, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA The Genesis spacecraft launched on 8 August 2001 sampled solar wind environments at L1 from 2001 to 2004. After the Science Capsule door was opened, numerous foils and samples were exposed to the various solar wind environments during periods including slow solar wind from the streamer belts, fast solar wind flows from coronal holes, and coronal mass ejections. The Survey and Examination of Eroded Returned Surfaces (SEERS) program led by NASA's Space Environments and Effects program had initiated access for the space materials community to the remaining Science Capsule hardware after the science samples had been removed for evaluation of materials exposure to the space environment. This presentation will describe the process used to generate a reference radiation Genesis Radiation Environment developed for the SEERS program for use by the materials science community in their analyses of the Genesis hardware. I. Introduction ASA's Space Environments and Effects (SEE) Program initiated the Surveying and Examination of Eroded N Returned Surfaces (SEERS) Initiative in 2003. The goal of the Initiative was to provide leadership in the engineering analysis of returned flight hardware by supporting a comprehensive effort to understand environmental effects due to solar W, ionizing radiation, plasmas, neutral contamination, meteoroids, and other conditions experienced during the mission (not primary science mission objectives).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars 2001 Odyssey and the "Autogen" Process
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@USU AUTOGEN: The Mars 2001 Odyssey and the "Autogen" Process By Roy Gladden June 6, 2002 Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Abstract In many deep space and interplanetary missions, it is widely recognized that the scheduling of many commands to operate a spacecraft can follow very regular patterns. In these instances, it is greatly desired to convert the knowledge of how commands are scheduled into algorithms in order to automate the development of command sequences. In doing so, it is possible to dramatically reduce the number of people and work-hours that are required to develop a sequence. The development of the "autogen" process for the Mars 2001 Odyssey spacecraft is one implementation of this concept. It combines robust scheduling algorithms with software that is compatible with pre- existing "uplink" software, and literally reduced the duration of some sequence generation processes from weeks to minutes. This paper outlines the "autogen" tools and processes and describes how they have been implemented for the various phases of the Mars 2001 Odyssey mission. What is autogen? manually building the commands for lengthy and well- understood command sequences, efforts were made to The term "autogen" is applied in two different ways. develop software that would automatically schedule the First, "autogen," in its broadest sense, identifies a commands given certain input data. By taking the process that may be used to automatically generate knowledge for how commands were to be scheduled sequences for a spacecraft and, second, it is a Solaris and writing algorithms to replicate that knowledge, it script that has been used to facilitate this process.
    [Show full text]
  • News Briefs the Elite Runners Were Those Who Are Responsible for Vive
    VOL. 117 - NO. 16 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, APRIL 19, 2013 $.30 A COPY 1st Annual Daffodil Day on the MARATHON MONDAY MADNESS North End Parks Celebrates Spring by Sal Giarratani Someone once said, “Ide- by Matt Conti ologies separate us but dreams and anguish unite us.” I thought of this quote after hearing and then view- ing the horrific devastation left in the aftermath of the mass violence that occurred after two bombs went off near the finish line of the Boston Marathon at 2:50 pm. Three people are reported dead and over 100 injured in the may- hem that overtook the joy of this annual event. At this writing, most are assuming it is an act of ter- rorism while officials have yet to call it such at this time 24 hours later. The Ribbon-Cutting at the 1st Annual Daffodil Day. entire City of Boston is on (Photo by Angela Cornacchio) high alert. The National On Sunday, April 14th, the first annual Daffodil Day was Guard has been mobilized celebrated on the Greenway. The event was hosted by The and stationed at area hospi- Friends of the North End Parks (FOTNEP) in conjunction tals. Mass violence like what with the Rose F. Kennedy Greenway Conservancy and North we all just experienced can End Beautification Committee. The celebration included trigger overwhelming feel- ings of anxiety, anger and music by the Boston String Academy and poetry, as well as (Photo by Andrew Martorano) daffodils. Other activities were face painting, a petting zoo fear. Why did anyone or group and a dog show held by RUFF.
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Sample Return
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Stardust Sample Return Press Kit January 2006 www.nasa.gov Contacts Merrilee Fellows Policy/Program Management (818) 393-0754 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission (818) 393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation (206) 543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Contents General Release ............................................................................................................... 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……............…… 7 Recovery Timeline ................................................................................................ 18 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……...........……… 20 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…..........….. 28 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………............... 31 Other Comet Missions .......................................................................................... 33 NASA's Discovery Program .................................................................................. 36 Program/Project Management …………………………........................…..…..………...... 40 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA PREPARES FOR RETURN OF INTERSTELLAR CARGO NASA’s Stardust mission is nearing Earth after a 2.88 billion mile round-trip journey
    [Show full text]
  • The Messenger Sept. 8Th GENESIS SUNDAY
    WHAT’S INSIDE: Stewardship and Finance……...pg. 2 Congregational News…………... pg. 3 Celebrating Lohmen……………..pg. 4 Adult Education…………………...pg. 5 Faith Through the Generations….pgs. 6-7 Community Events…………..pgs. 8-9 WPC Food Pantry………………..pg. 10 The Messenger Prayer Ministry & Groups…….pg. 11 Environmental Stewardship...pg. 12 VOLUME 89, ISSUE 8 Confirmation Class……………...pg. 12 AUGUST 2019 Sept. 8th GENESIS SUNDAY Bring the whole family and invite a friend for a day full of food, games, live music, and lots of wild surprises! 2 CONGREGATIONAL NEWS The Pastor Nominating Committee Report (PNC) Nine members of the congregation were nominated and elected to serve on the Pastor Nominating Committee (PNC). They are: Andrew Finkner, Michael Gregg, Steve Hughes, Jim Kinkennon, Sandi Larson, Deb Schorr, Alisha Stokes, Allen Wachter and Joyce Douglas, Moderator. These members represent the whole congregation and have the responsibility for nominating an individual to present to the congregation to serve as our Head of Staff. In the future months, the PNC will journey through the search process seeking to hear the call of Christ. The first step will be to review the documentation from our group meetings held last Fall which represents the needs of Westminster and then complete the Ministry Information Form. The PNC has received reading materials already and will begin meeting together in early August. The PNC plans to keep the congregation informed on the status of this search. Our journey begins……… Joyce Douglas, Moderator LOOKING AHEAD Sun. August 4th—Celebrating Lohmen, our sister church in Germany (after worship, meet in chancel) Tues., Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Sample Return
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Genesis Sample Return Press Kit September 2004 Media Contacts Donald Savage Policy/program management 202/358-1727 Headquarters, [email protected] Washington, D.C. DC Agle Genesis mission 818/393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. Robert Tindol Principal investigator 626/395-3631 California Institute of Technology [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. Contents General Release ……................……………………………….........................………..……....… 3 Media Services Information …………………………….........................................………..…….... 5 Quick Facts…………………………………………………….......................................………....…. 6 Mysteries of the Solar Nebula ........………...…………………………......................................……7 Solar Studies Past and Present ...................................................................................... 8 NASA's Discovery Program .......................................................................................... 10 Mission Overview….………...…………...…………………………....................................…….... 12 Mid-Air Retrievals........................................................................................................... 14 Sample Return Missions ................................................................................................ 15 Spacecraft ………………………………………………………………......................................…. 26 Science Objectives ………………………………………………………....................................…. 33 The Solar Corona and
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis, Evolution, and the Search for a Reasoned Faith
    GENESIS EVOLUTION AND THE SEARCH FOR A REASONED FAITH Mary Katherine Birge, SSJ Brian G. Henning Rodica M. M. Stoicoiu Ryan Taylor 7031-GenesisEvolution Pgs.indd 3 1/3/11 12:57 PM Created by the publishing team of Anselm Academic. Cover art royalty free from iStock Copyright © 2011 by Mary Katherine Birge, SSJ; Brian G. Henning; Rodica M. M. Stoicoiu; and Ryan Taylor. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced by any means without the written permission of the publisher, Anselm Academic, Christian Brothers Publications, 702 Terrace Heights, Winona, MN 55987-1320, www.anselmacademic.org. The scriptural quotations contained herein, with the exception of author transla- tions in chapter 1, are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible: Catho- lic Edition. Copyright © 1993 and 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 7031 (PO2844) ISBN 978-0-88489-755-2 7031-GenesisEvolution Pgs.indd 4 1/3/11 12:57 PM c ontents Introduction ix .1 Genesis 1 Mary Katherine Birge, SSJ Why Read the Bible in the First Place? 1 A Faithful and Rational Reading of the Bible 6 Oral Tradition and the Composition of the Bible 6 Two Stories, Not One 8 “Cosmogony” and the Ancient Near East 11 Genesis 2–3: The Yahwist Account 12 Disaster: The Babylonian Exile 27 Genesis 1: The Priestly Account 31 .2 Scientific Knowledge and Evolutionary Biology 41 Ryan Taylor Science and Its Methodology 41 The History of Evolutionary Theory 44 The Mechanisms of Evolution 46 Evidence for Evolution 60 Limits of Scientific Knowledge 64 Common Arguments against Evolution from Creationism and Intelligent Design 65 3.
    [Show full text]
  • FALLEN HEROES SERMON SERIES NOAH – Genesis 6:5-22 June 27, 2021 Rev
    FALLEN HEROES SERMON SERIES NOAH – Genesis 6:5-22 June 27, 2021 Rev. Kory Wilcoxson There’s probably no Bible story more beloved by children than Noah’s Ark. What kid doesn’t like boats and animals? I’ve seen baby’s nurseries decorated with Noah’s Ark-themed murals and stuffed animals and crib sheets and musical mobiles. There are lots of children’s bibles that tell the sanitized version of this story with pictures of lambs and bunnies and giraffes making their way onto the ark two by two. When we first learn this story, we learn about how Noah obeyed God and God protected Noah and when the flood waters finally receded everyone lived happily ever after…well, at least for a couple days. That’s the version of the story we’re told growing up. But the real story is a lot more complex and morally ambiguous than what we learned in Sunday school. For our summer sermon series, we’re looking at some favorite stories from the Bible that may be a different than what we learned growing up. The series is called “Fallen Heroes” because not all the heroes we learned about deserve that title. Here’s what makes this so problematic for our story today. The fallen hero isn’t Noah. Noah does everything God asks of him. He doesn’t balk. He doesn’t complain. In fact, he doesn’t speak a word during the whole story. OK, after the flood he gets a little drunk, but let’s cut the guy some slack.
    [Show full text]