DOCSLIB.ORG

Calligraphy/The Scholar-Gentry Calligraphy: Mao Zedong And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calligraphy/The Scholar-Gentry Calligraphy: Mao Zedong And China Calligraphy/The Scholar-Gentry Calligraphy: China is one of the world’s oldest ongoing civilizations and it’s well-known for many beautiful forms of art including silk painting, pottery, kite making, paper cutting for example. But it is calligraphy that stands out, likely because the words evolved from pictures. • Calligraphy, Chinese writing, has been practiced for over 3,000 years. • It is recognized as the ultimate artistic expression, requiring years of training, discipline and dedication • It is an art of performance, but not until rigorous defined requirements have been fulfilled. Fundamentals must be mastered and brush stroke techniques must be learned. Only then can individual interpretation hold sway. • The first 1600 years or so, Chinese writing went through many revisions, from pictographic forms to simpler abstract representations. • First, the writing was done on stone, metal or bone; next bamboo or wood. • When paper evolved as the preferred writing material, the fully independent art form developed (second century A.C.E.). • The following graphic shows the styles: • Today all styles are still practiced, each allowing for artistic interpretation. • In China today, calligraphy is perhaps the most important art form. Mao Zedong and Calligraphy Chairman Mao was known to be a master of calligraphy and poetry, and while the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution showed disdain for the past and the educated elite, he was well-respected for his skill and talent as a calligrapher and his poems. Many are on display at the National Museum of China. The Scholar-Gentry: The scholar-official was a civil servant appointed by the emperor to perform day-to- day governance from the Han Dynasty to the end of Qing Dynasty in 1912 (about 400 years). They were chosen from the scholar-gentry who were thoroughly trained in the art of calligraphy and Confucian texts. • Scholar-gentry—Those who were not chosen as scholar-officials were a kind of social leader who taught and oversaw community projects, preached Confucian moral teachings, etc. They also were scribes, thus the Scholar’s Desk exhibit we have at the JSMA. • They underwent a serious course of study, wrote essays on moral issues and current affairs. • They mastered the difficult Chinese writing—calligraphy • They had high social status, prestige and power. • A meritocracy developed allowing for social mobility to the best students Those who excelled at the study of the Confucian texts, etc had honor, power and prestige. • However, abuse of power and corruption commonly occurred once the scholar- gentry had passed their exams and had their future assured. Scholar’s Tools: • Brushes—various sizes from animal hair (goat, rabbit, weasel) • Ink stick— graphite, vermillion, soot • Inkstone—ink is ground into powder on the stone and mixed with liquid in the well of the stone • Paper—parchment • Libation cups (sometimes!)—there were often social gatherings where transcribing or creating was done and drinking occurred. Some experts point to noticing when the scholar became intoxicated from the subtle change in the hand in his work. • Weights—often jade, to hold the parchment paper flat. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Northern Clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Altazin, Keith, "The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 543. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE NORTHERN CLERGY AND THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Keith Altazin B.S., Louisiana State University, 1978 M.A., Southeastern Louisiana University, 2003 August 2011 Acknowledgments The completion of this dissertation would have not been possible without the support, assistance, and encouragement of a number of people. First, I would like to thank the members of my doctoral committee who offered me great encouragement and support throughout the six years I spent in the graduate program. I would especially like thank Dr. Victor Stater for his support throughout my journey in the PhD program at LSU. From the moment I approached him with my ideas on the Pilgrimage of Grace, he has offered extremely helpful advice and constructive criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Education and Training of Gentry Sons in Early Modern England
    Working Papers No. 128/09 The Education and Training of Gentry Sons in Early-Modern England . Patrick Wallis & Cliff Webb © Patrick Wallis, LSE Cliff Webb, Independent Scholar November 2009 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0) 20 7955 7860 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7955 7730 The Education and Training of Gentry Sons in Early-Modern England* Patrick Wallis and Cliff Webb Abstract: This paper explores the education and training received by the sons of the English gentry in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Using information from the herald’s visitations of four counties, it offers quantitative evidence of the proportion of gentry children who entered university, spent time at one of the inns of court or became apprentices in London. We show that over the period there was little change in the educational destinations of gentry sons: university and apprenticeship absorbed roughly equal proportions; the inns of court slightly less. We also show that a son’s position in the birth order had a very strong influence on the kind of education he received. Eldest sons were much more likely to go to university or one of the inns of court. Younger sons were much more likely to become apprentices in London – as we show, trade clearly was an acceptable career for the gentry. There is little sign of a change in the status of different educational choices in this period. Our findings confirm some traditional assumptions about the importance of birth order and normative expectations in determining the life-courses of gentry children in the seventeenth century: historians should not over-state the autonomy of elite children in deciding their futures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity
    The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilkinson, Ryan Hayes. 2015. The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467211 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity A dissertation presented by Ryan Hayes Wilkinson to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Ryan Hayes Wilkinson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Michael McCormick Ryan Hayes Wilkinson The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity Abstract In the fifth and sixth centuries CE, the Roman Empire fragmented, along with its network of political, cultural, and socio-economic connections. How did that network’s collapse reshape the social and mental horizons of communities in one part of the Roman world, now eastern France? Did new political frontiers between barbarian kingdoms redirect those communities’ external connections, and if so, how? To address these questions, this dissertation focuses on the cities of two Gallo-Roman tribal groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Serfdom on Labor Markets†
    The effect of serfdom on labor markets† Peter Sandholt Jensen Cristina Victoria Radu Battista Severgnini Paul Richard Sharp Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark Abstract This research provides evidence on how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. While many economists, historians and others have argued that serfdom had an impact on the mobility and wages, revisionist historians have countered that workers found ways to circumvent the restrictions imposed by serfdom. Using a unique data source based on 18th century estates, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market using a differences-in-differences approach, and find evidence consistent with a strong negative effect on serfdom following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility. Keywords: Serfdom, labor mobility, coercion JEL Classification: J3, N33, P4. † We thank Philipp Ager, Jeremy Atack, Casper Worm Hansen, Alex Klein, Christian Skovsgaard, Nico Voigtländer and seminar participants at University of Copenhagen, University of Southern Denmark and the 2017 Economic History Association conference in San Jose for useful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Carnegie: the Richest American of All Time
    ANDREW CARNEGIE: THE RICHEST AMERICAN OF ALL TIME Andrew Carnegie may be the richest American of all time. The Scottish immigrant sold his company, U.S. Steel, to J.P. Morgan for $480 million in 1901. This amount is equivalent to slightly more than 2.1% of United States GDP at the time. Carnegie has a rags to riches story from a poor Scottish immigrant to the richest man in the world and then gave it all away. Who was Andrew Carnegie? Born in Dunfermline, Scotland, on November 25, 1835, Andrew Carnegie was the first son of Margaret and William Carnegie. Although he had little formal education, Carnegie grew up in a family that believed in the importance of reading and learning. His father was a “political reformer” and influenced Carnegie in the fight of the classes. Whilst his mother was a proud woman that commanded respect in the local community. Dunfermline was famous for producing fine linen but the town fell on hard times when industrialism made home-based weaving obsolete, leaving workers, such as William Carnegie, out of work. William joined the popular Chartist movement, which believed conditions for workers would improve if the working class were to take over the Government from the landed gentry. When the movement failed in 1848, William Carnegie and family sold all their belongings and moved to America. “The emigrant is the capable, energetic, ambitious, discontented man.” The Carnegie family settled in Allegheny, Pennsylvania which was referred to as a “slum town” at that time. There, at the age of thirteen, Carnegie began his career as a bobbin boy in a cotton factory, earning $1.20 per week.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Nobility on the Eve Of
    The RussianNobility on the Eve of the 1905 Revolution* By G. M. HAMBURG In the midst of the revolutionaryupheaval in seventeenth-century England James Harrington,a historian and pioneer social scientist, wrote: "A monarchydivested of its nobility has no refuge under heaven but an army. Whereforethe dissolutionof this governmentcaused the [Civil] war, not the war the dissolutionof this government."'It was not unnaturalfor Harringtonto attributecapital importance to the disaffec- tion of much of the English elite as a cause of the Civil War. Born in 1611,he had witnessedthe disputesbetween factionsof the ruling elite- especiallybetween the centralgovernment and local notables-and had watched political conflicts and religious disagreementsundermine the old politicalorder in England.2 Harrington'sdictum may be applied to other monarchicalEuropean states before the end of teir old regimes. Norman Hampson has ob- served that "the main political conflict in eighteenth-centuryFrance was . the struggle of the aristocracy against the declining power of royal absolutism."'Virtually all of the modern historiansof the French revolutionagree that what AlbertSoboul called the "revoltof the aristo- cracy"between 1787 and 1789 contributedto the destabilizationof the monarchicalsystem.4 It was aristocraticopposition to royal taxationthat * This paper was prepared for a session of the Southern Historical Association, 10 November 1977. Research was funded by grants from the InternationalResearch and Exchange Board and the Fulbright-Hays fund. Writing was funded by the Mabelle MacLeod Lewis Foundation. 1 Quoted in ChristopherHill, The Century of Revolution 1603-1714 (New York, 1961), p. 66. 2 For thirty years historianshave debated the social origins of the English revolu- tion. The historiography of this debate is summarized neatly in Lawrence Stone, The Causes of the English Revolution 1529-1642 (New York, 1972), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Lords, Knights and Gentry the 13Th Century Sees the Start of Changes
    70 Lords, Knights and Gentry The 13th Century sees the start of changes that will come to full fruit in the 14th Century - the development of the role of the knight in the shires, the appearance of the 'Gentleman', Bastard Feudalism. Fountains Abbey Cistercians at work in a detail from the Life of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, illustrated by Jörg Breu the Elder (1500) St. Bernard de Clairveau ? Arms of Fitz Elys Land use A Glossary of Terms FEUDAL/Feudalism/Feudalize governing system of nobility in medieval Europe, relating to a fief FEUD abbreviation for Feudal FEUDAL CHARGES/Aids vassal payment to lord for his going on Crusade, son's knighting FEUDALITY regime or feudal system FEUDAL LEVY army obligation a lord needs to field a number of knights and men-at-arms for 40 days service in the kings army in exchange for land. A liegeman would go to the royal castle with necessary warhorse, armament and attendants specified by contract. FEUDAL PYRAMID king over sub-tenants FEUDAL REGIME holding to a feudal system FEUDAL SERVICE vassal holding land from a lord in exchange for military service FEUDAL SYSTEM from lord to vassal, homage and fealty, and enfeoffment FEUDAL DEMESNE ANCIENT DEMESNE land held by the king at the time of the Domesday Book. CUSTOMAL written collection of a manor’s customs DEMESNE manor land held by free or villein tenants but directly cultivated for the lord by an agent MESSUAGE portion of land occupied as a site for a swelling or house and all appurtenances FEUDAL LORD AVOWRY lord of the manor LIEGE feudal lord over a vassal
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Serfdom, Emancipation, and Land Inequality: New Evidence
    Russian Serfdom, Emancipation, and Land Inequality: New Evidence Steven Nafziger1 Department of Economics, Williams College May 2013 Note to Readers: This long descriptive paper is part of an even larger project - "Serfdom, Emancipation, and Economic Development in Tsarist Russia" - that is very much a work in progress. As such, some obvious extensions are left out. I apologize for any inconsistencies that remain. Abstract Serfdom is often viewed as a major institutional constraint on the economic development of Tsarist Russia, one that persisted well after emancipation occurred in 1861 through the ways that property rights were transferred to the peasantry. However, scholars have generally asserted this causal relationship with few facts in hand. This paper introduces a variety of newly collected data, covering European Russia at the district (uezd) level, to describe serfdom, emancipation, and the subsequent evolution of land holdings among the rural population into the 20th century. A series of simple empirical exercises describes several important ways that the institution of serfdom varied across European Russia; outlines how the emancipation reforms differentially affected the minority of privately owned serfs relative to the majority of other types of peasants; and connects these differences to long-run variation in land ownership, obligations, and inequality. The evidence explored in this paper constitutes the groundwork for considering the possible channels linking the demise of serfdom to Russia’s slow pace of economic growth prior to the Bolshevik Revolution. JEL Codes: N33, Keywords: Russia, economic history, serfdom, inequality, land reform, institutions 1 Tracy Dennison offered thoughtful questions at the onset of this project. Ivan Badinski, Cara Foley, Veranika Li, Aaron Seong, and Stefan Ward-Wheten provided wonderful research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic Matures
    HISTORYHISTORY — ROME The Republic Matures The Roman Republic was not built in a day, but was the product of generations of reform and even some serious reverses. by Steve Bonta and wounds, some of them very recent, (all senators and consuls were patricians), from tortures received in debtors’ prison. but providing the bulk of Rome’s military This is the second installment in a series of He had, he explained to the onlookers, forces. Most plebeians depended for their articles on the rise and fall of the Roman been deprived of his livelihood. Having livelihood on farming, an activity that was Republic. served in many wars, he was unable to cul- frequently disrupted by warfare. More- tivate his lands. Enemy armies had burnt over, the new lands annexed by Rome as bout 15 years after the founding his property and driven away his cattle. spoils of war were invariably parceled out of the Roman Republic in 509 Worse still, he had been assessed crip- to patricians, widening the gap between A B.C., an apparition appeared one pling taxes, which he could only pay by the urban gentry, who controlled the ma- day in the Roman Forum. It was no phan- taking on heavy debt. As a result, he had chinery of state and exploited the laws tom or divine portent, though, but a flesh- lost his property and had been delivered to amass more and more wealth, and the and-blood figure, a pale and emaciated old to “a house of correction and a place of rural underclass, who were systematically man dressed in rags who soon attracted a execution” as punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Flush Or Not? Understanding Royalty, Nobility and Gentry
    Royal Flush or Not? Understanding Royalty, Nobility and Gentry Craig L. Foster, A.G.® [email protected] Definition of Royalty and Nobility The difference between royalty and nobility is that royalty “means that they were born into their position. Therefore only the king and queen and their direct relations can be considered royalty. … Nobility is a title conferred on a person if they meet certain requirements.” “The Aristocracy of England,” http://www.aristocracyuk.co.uk/ Royalty Definition of royalty is people of royal blood or status. Ranks of Royalty – King or Queen Prince Princess The royal family includes the immediate royal heirs as well as the extended family. Many also hold noble titles such as the Duke of Cornwall, which the heir apparent to the throne, and the Duke of York, as well as the Duke of Cambridge. www.royal.gov.uk Nobility Originally, nobility grew out of the feudal warrior classes. Nobles and knights were warriors who swore allegiance to the king in exchange for land. “Peers, Peeresses and other People,” www.avictorian.com/nobility.html “…hereditary permanent rank is what most Englishmen prize above all earthly honours. It is the permanency, especially, that they value.” Beckett, The Aristocracy in England, 1660-1914, p. 92 Noble Titles and Order of Precedence – Duke Marquess Earl Viscount Baron A peer of the realm is someone who holds one or more of the above titles. The peerage is a continuation of the original baronage system which existed in feudal times. “Historically the peerage formed a tightly knit group of powerful nobles, inter-related through blood and marriage in successive generations…” Debrett’s Essential Guide to the Peerage and Wikipedia In Scots law, there are certain titles that are recognized by the Crown as almost comparable to but not quite at the level of the peerage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wealth of the English Landed Gentry, 1870–1935*
    The wealth of the English landed gentry, 1870–1935* by Mark Rothery Abstract This article explores changing levels of unsettled personal wealth amongst the landed gentry of Devon, Hertfordshire and Lincolnshire during the period of the Agricultural Depression of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The main quantitative sources employed for this research are the National Probate Calendars. Despite problems with agricultural incomes and land values, overall levels of gentry wealth were sustained. This was a result of the diversification of wealth away from land and into other safer investments of a non-agricultural character. A final section shows how one Devon gentry family converted land into liquid investments at the end of the First World War. The highly adaptable nature of landed elites in the face of profound changes in modern society and the flexibility of relations between landed and non-landed elites have been amongst the most important findings of scholars of landed society over the past fifty years. F. M. L. Thompson and David Cannadine amongst others have shown that the aristocracy and the gentry were willing to diversify their investments into mining, railways and a range of other urban and industrial ventures as economic conditions came to permit such behaviour.1 This has contributed to more general explanations of the openness and flexibility of the British landed order during the mod- ern period. The slow and gradual decline of landed elites along with their fluid relations with new aspirants to elite society helps explain, it has been argued, the smooth and evolutionary na- ture of modernisation in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aristocracy, the Gentry and Their Parliamentary Tradition in Nineteenth-Century Hungary
    CHAPTER NINE THE ARISTOCRACY, THE GENTRY AND THEIR PARLIAMENTARY TRADITION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY HUNGARY Introduction From the Middle Ages until recently the aristocracy and the gentry land- owners preserved their ascendancy in Hungarian society. These two groups, the Catholic and Habsburgtreu titled aristocracy, and the partly Protestant well-to-do provincial gentry, the ‘backbone of the nation’, formed the landowning élite. Each group possessed independent social power while, arguably, no other social group did so enduringly on a wide scale. The élite’s power was rooted in the noble ownership of land, based on royal donation, in exemptions, immunities and other privileges; in the maintenance of serfdom, that enabled the élite to be masters over the bulk of the population as a workforce; and in the political institutions at their disposal: the county and the diet. Other élites, vested in privileged districts, like the Saxons and the Szekels in Transylvania, the Jász-Kun Districts in the Plain, and the Serbian community in the south, wielded local power only. For centuries, the Roman Catholic Church was an independent force which exercised influ- ence in the whole Kingdom. But the Church lost its independent political position after 1780.1 The vigorous use of the monarch’s ius patronatus in making church appointments, and particularly the Erastian policies pur- sued by the government under Joseph II and his successors, made the Church dependent on the crown. Nor could the towns match the power of the landowning noble élite. Urban society was not strong enough to challenge the paramount influence and political domination of land- owners.
    [Show full text]