2019 Year in Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 Year in Review 2019 Year in Review was tumultuous and challenging, dominated right to go to court to hold corporations accountable for 2019by an out-of-control president who by year’s wrongdoing. end was impeached, but also marked by hard-won victo- ries and the continued growth of a nationwide progres- On the legal front, we continued to challenge the Trump sive grassroots movement. administration’s illegal policies and regulatory rollbacks. In a suit filed on behalf of three landowners in south Texas In the face of a lawless administration, Public Citizen and a Texas environmental group, we were the first orga- worked with allies to organize actions nationwide at nization in the nation to sue over Trump’s declaration of key moments. Our goals were to protect from political a national emergency at the southern border. interference those investigators probing Russian med- dling in the 2016 election, then to support lawmakers In another case, we intervened in an industry challenge as they moved to impeach President Donald Trump for to a minimum-wage law and helped to preserve $123 mil- abuse of power and obstruction of justice. We turned out lion in additional wages for farmworkers. hundreds of thousands of people in hundreds of events around the country. Our litigation also brought to light government informa- tion describing the appalling conditions in an infamous Highlighting the Trump administration’s corruption, Alabama detention center. Public Citizen and allies pushed successfully for U.S. House of Representatives passage of the For the People We sued the administration to protect Obama-era fuel Act (H.R. 1), a package of democracy reforms unprece- economy standards; sued to protect workers at pork pro- dented in scope. cessing plants from a new rule eliminating speed limits on processing lines; and took the administration to court And we won critical improvements to the revised North over the rollback of a rule requiring certain businesses to American Free Trade Agreement deal that Trump signed provide data on workplace injury and illness. in 2018. The final deal eliminated the Big Pharma give- aways and strengthened labor and environmental terms And of course we continued our work to protect consum- and their enforcement. ers. We launched a campaign to bolster digital privacy and waged a fight against Facebook’s proposed crypto- With tens of millions still lacking health insurance, we currency, known as Libra. We successfully intervened in ramped up our Medicare for All campaign, waging an regulatory cases to promote transparency and fight unfair aggressive communications strategy to counter indus- electric utility rate hikes. And we successfully pushed for try lies about the policy and a grassroots campaign to a ban on certain dangerous surgical mesh products for the mobilize support. For the first time ever, House leader- transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. ship took Medicare for All seriously enough to hold four hearings on it. To combat climate change, we participated in the intro- duction of legislation to develop national protections for We also were instrumental in strengthening House- workers exposed to high heat — a way not only to protect passed legislation that would curb drug prices. workers but also to illustrate the real impacts of climate change. Throughout the year, we urged reporters to cover We had other successes in the House: After months of climate change as a crisis. And our Texas office made a prodding from us and other groups, Congress allocated big impact on climate and environmental policy in 2019. $425 million to secure elections. And we attained a mile- stone when the House passed a bill to prohibit forced And that’s just a sampling. The following pages outline arbitration clauses, which require people to give up their in detail this work and much more. PUBLIC CITIZEN NEWS JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2020 5 DEMOCRACY rom calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump to making the case for the sweeping legislative package Fknown as H.R. 1 to organizing actions nationwide to demand secure elections, 2019 was a banner year for advancing bold solutions and holding accountable a president and a White House intent on obstructing justice. BUILDING IMPEACHMENT MOMENTUM March 8, they passed the For the People Act (H.R. 1), the most sweeping pro-democracy STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY From the moment Trump set foot in and anti-corruption legislation of the past office, it was obvious that he saw no duty 50 years. ◊ In June, the country took a major step to- to uphold our constitutional values. By ward fixing our broken democracy as New The measure — which includes ethics Hampshire became the 20th state to sup- putting his daily, flagrant corruption and and campaign finance reforms, policies to port a constitutional amendment to over- abuses of power in the open for all to see, slow the revolving door between public ser- turn the U.S. Supreme Court’s disastrous he has flaunted his disdain for the foun- vice and business, and electoral reforms to Citizens United decision. For seven years, dational principles of our democracy. The Public Citizen has led an energized coali- ensure that every eligible voter can cast a tion to pass 82 local resolutions in New Constitution has a remedy for a presi- vote free from barriers — would enable law- Hampshire in support of an amendment, dent who betrays the country in this way: makers and policymakers to work for and which would prohibit corporations from impeachment. Revelations in October of protect the people, not superrich donors. spending money in elections. Nineteen oth- Trump’s efforts to interfere in the 2020 Public Citizen spearheaded the coalition er states, Washington, D.C., and more than presidential election by extorting Ukraine 800 municipalities – bolstered by more than pushing for the policy — an unprecedented 5 million petition signatures – have called into investigating a political opponent gal- alliance, called the Declaration for American for a constitutional amendment to overturn vanized progressives to call for just that. Democracy, of more than 130 democracy, Citizens United. Public Citizen helped lead the mobiliza- environmental, good government, civil ◊ Pushed by a broad coalition of organiza- tion of more than 200,000 people as part of rights and other organizations. tions, including Public Citizen, the New York more than 600 “Nobody Is Above the Law” Later in March, Public Citizen and other Legislature passed a raft of major election pro-impeachment actions that took place coalition representatives joined U.S. Sen. reforms in January – including early voting in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and pre-registration for 16- and 17-year- Tom Udall (D-N.M.) for the introduction of olds. Lawmakers also approved same-day on Dec. 17, the night before the U.S. House the For the People Act in the U.S. Senate. registration and no-excuse absentee bal- of Representatives made the historic deci- The bill was quickly co-sponsored by every lots, subject to voter approval. sion to impeach Trump. Activists and oth- Democratic senator. ers gathered in front of the district offices of ◊ Activists with Public Citizen and more than Public Citizen and the coalition are mobi- 30 state and national groups in dozens of House members and U.S. senators to call on lizing people across the country to move the cities nationwide organized evening vigils lawmakers to uphold the Constitution and bill in the Senate in 2021. on Aug. 6 to mark the 54th anniversary of their oaths of office by supporting Trump’s the signing of the Voting Rights Act. Public impeachment. (See story on page 1.) Citizen spearheaded the effort and urged SECURING ELECTIONS Congress to restore access to the ballot. This mobilization was part of a larger Voting systems in states remain vulnerable The 1965 law improved voting rights and grassroots effort that launched in October to internal and external hackers who might voter turnout for black, brown, Native and and included nationwide actions and town do everything from change names and Asian Americans, but the Supreme Court halls during the November congressional gutted the law in its 2013 Shelby decision. addresses in voter registration databases recess to amplify calls for an impeachment to change votes cast, thereby manipulating ◊ Along with its partners in the “Trump Is Not inquiry and Trump’s removal from office. outcomes. In 2019, Public Citizen pressed Above the Law” coalition, Public Citizen Public Citizen played a key role through- amplified the findings of Special Counsel Congress to fund election security ade- out; we spearheaded a media campaign in Robert Mueller’s report on the Russian ef- quately and pass comprehensive election support of impeachment, strategized with forts to interfere in the 2016 election. We security reforms. To ensure the integrity lawmakers and lobbied for impeachment. mobilized 300 demonstrations nationwide of the 2020 elections, Public Citizen called to rally for the report’s release. Once it was Riding the crest of activist energy, on the public, we convened a virtual Mueller Book on Congress to send states $600 million in Club to encourage more people to read the morning of the House vote, representatives election security grants. report and help participants in the nation- from Public Citizen and some of the nation’s But Congress moved slowly, so on Sept. wide reading group understand the nuanc- largest grassroots groups, veterans groups, 17, we organized a national day of action at es of the document. Book club videos have constitutional organizations, national secu- garnered more than 600,000 views. more than 40 locations across the country rity voices and other organizations rallied to urge senators to give states the money ◊ When it comes to dealing with the “revolv- at the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • An Examination of the Call to Censure the President
    S. HRG. 109–524 AN EXAMINATION OF THE CALL TO CENSURE THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 31, 2006 Serial No. J–109–66 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 28–341 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Virginians, Five Generations Ago, My Ancestors Were Freed from the Shackles of Slavery
    REFORMING OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Dear Virginians, Five generations ago, my ancestors were freed from the shackles of slavery. Just two generations ago, my grandfather, one of Virginia’s first Black lawyers, was forced by Jim Crow to obtain his law degree in the north. And my father was one of the first to integrate his elementary school in 1960. As I travel throughout the Commonwealth and stand as an elected official in the former capital of the Confederacy, I often wonder how my ancestors would feel, and what they would think, about their descendant who has the opportunity to be Virginia’s first Black Attorney General. I’m running for Attorney General because we’ve made progress in building a more fair and equitable Virginia, but we all know we have not come far enough. The vestiges of slavery and Jim Crow live on in our Commonwealth’s criminal code, in our judicial system, and in our policing. They criminalize Black and Brown communities and make every Virginian less safe. In order to embrace the new Virginia decade, we must build a justice system that works for everybody in our Commonwealth, not just a select few. We have arrived at a true moment of opportunity in our country and in our Commonwealth. We must elect leaders who will rise to that moment and seize the chance to create real change in our justice system, rather than continuing with those who have proven time and time again that they will only do the bare minimum to get by. For his entire career, Mark Herring has shown that he will follow when he has to, but he will not lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor C. Raj Kumar Professor & Vice Chancellor O.P
    Curriculum Vitae PROFESSOR C. RAJ KUMAR PROFESSOR & VICE CHANCELLOR O.P. JINDAL GLOBAL UNIVERSITY Tel: (+91-130) 4091900; Fax: (+91-130) 4091888 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Website: www.jgu.edu.in I. CURENT AFFILIATION (since 2009) Vice Chancellor, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) Dean, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) Director, International Institute for Higher Education Research & Capacity Building, Sonipat, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) II. EDUCATION Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Doctor of Legal Science (S.J.D.), 2011 Harvard Law School, United States of America LL.M. (Master of Laws), 2000. University of Oxford, United Kingdom B.C.L. (Bachelor of Civil Law), 1999. Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India LL.B. (Bachelor of Laws), 1997. Loyola College, University of Madras, India B.Com. (Bachelor of Commerce), 1994. III. AWARDS/SCHOLARSHIPS/FELLOWSHIPS (ANNEX I) Scholarships and fellowships awarded by the University of Oxford, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Loyola College, University of Madras, Monash University and Indiana University. IV. RESEARCH GRANTS/FUNDS (ANNEX II) Received research grants and funds from various educational and research institutions, foundations, and inter-governmental organisations including City University of Hong Kong; Sumitomo Foundation, Tokyo, Japan; and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). V. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Passed the New York Bar Exam (July 2001) and was admitted to the Bar of the State of New York, U.S.A., as an Attorney and Counsellor at Law in February 2002; admitted to the Bar Council of Delhi, New Delhi, India, in August 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendee Handout Packet 7.30.2020 AAM Webinar
    Association of Attorney-Mediators Webinar - Confidentiality in the Age of Online Mediations: Points to Ponder July 30, 2020 On July 30, 2020, from 11:30 a.m. to 12:45 p.m., the Association of Attorney Mediators will be presenting a webinar during which a moderator and four panelists will discuss the issues of confidentiality and discoverability that come with conducting mediations on platforms such as Zoom, with participants often in different states with different laws that govern mediation confidentiality. The panelists and moderator are from across the United States, as will be the attendees. The following panel members will discuss the enforceability of Confidentiality Agreements, the conflicts of laws principles that arise with multi-state mediations, the potential liability for confidentiality breaches of which mediators must be aware, and other salient issues. Panelists will be Danielle Hargrove, Jeff Kichaven, Jean Lawler and Michael Leech. Panel will be moderated by AAM President, Jimmy Lawson. Agenda 11:30-11:35: Welcome and Introduction of Panel Jimmy Lawson, Moderator 11:35-11:45: Brief synopsis of the substance of Kichaven’s articles Jeff Kichaven, Panelist 11:45-12:45 Discussion of mediation confidentiality. Various questions will be asked of the panel for discussion Table of Contents Speakers Bios Pages 2-3 Article: Mediator Confidentiality Promises Carry Serious Risks Pages 4-6 Article: What You Say In Online Mediation May Be Discoverable Pages 7-12 Article: Nix Your Mediators Prospective Waiver Of Liability Pages 13-16 1 Association of Attorney-Mediators Webinar - Confidentiality in the Age of Online Mediations: Points to Ponder Speakers and Panelists – July 30, 2020 Danielle L.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back to Go Forward: Remaking Detainee Policy*
    Looking Back to Go Forward: Remaking U.S. Detainee Policy* by James M. Durant, III, Lt Col USAF Deputy Head, Department of Law United States Air Force Academy Frank Anechiarico Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law United States Air Force Academy Maynard-Knox Professor of Government and Law Hamilton College [WEB VERSION] April, 2009 © James Durant, III, Frank Anechiarico * This article does not reflect the views of the Air Force, the United States Department of Defense, or the United States Government. “By mid-1966 the U.S. government had begun to fear for the welfare of American pilots and other prisoners held in Hanoi. Captured in the midst of an undeclared war, these men were labeled war criminals. .Anxious to make certain that they were covered by the Geneva Conventions and not tortured into making ‘confessions’ or brought to trial and executed, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large Averell Harriman asked [ New Yorker correspondent Robert] Shaplen to contact the North Vietnamese.” - Thomas Bass (2009) ++ Introduction This article, first explains why and how detainee policy as applied to those labeled enemy combatants, collapsed and failed by 2008. Second, we argue that the most direct and effective way for the Obama Administration to reassert the rule of law and protect national security in the treatment of detainees is to direct review and prosecution of detainee cases to U.S. Attorneys and adjudication of charges against them to the federal courts. The immediate relevance of this topic is raised by the decision of the Obama Administration to use the federal courts to try Ali Saleh Kahah al-Marri in a (civilian) criminal court.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Study Programs Accredited As of Friday, August 13, 2021 General Ethics Course ID Seminar Name Provider Date Credits Credits
    Home Study Programs Accredited as of Friday, September 3, 2021 General Ethics Course ID Seminar Name Provider Date Credits Credits 775960 TECH POLICIES FOR LAW FIRMS ABA 2019 2 780042 #ITSMYLANE:LGL MEDICAL ETHICS ABA 2019 2 0 788385 #METOO CLASS ACTION UPDATES ABA 2020 1 0 787888 100 YEARS ACCESS TO JUSTICE ABA 2020 1 0 775395 1031 EXCHANGES: NEW TAX ACT ABA 2018 2 770878 1041 FIDUCIARY INCOME TAX RTRN ABA 2019 2 790283 1782 CONUNDRUM ABA 2020 2 778467 19TH AMEND THEN & NOW: 21ST CE ABA 2019 2 0 791776 1-A SHARPER FOCUS: 43RD ANNL ABA 2020 4 788727 20 FED PROCURMNT ETHICS SOCIAL ABA 2020 3 2.4 788725 20 FED PROCURMNT:ADR ABA 2020 2 0 788728 20 FED PROCURMNT:GOV CONSTUCT ABA 2020 2 0 788726 20 FED PROCURMNT:WHITHER WHETH ABA 2020 2 0 775850 2017 SANCTIONS YEAR IN REVIEW ABA 2019 2 776071 2017 TAX ACT, ADVICE & ETHICS ABA 2019 2 1.8 775572 2017 TAX ACT: CORP TRANSACTNS ABA 2018 2 775609 2017 TAX ACT: FIRM PLANNING ABA 2018 2 775554 2017 TAX ACT: LAW FIRM PLAN ABA 2018 2 775532 2017 TAX ACT: NEED TO KNOW ABA 2018 2 775859 2017 TAX REFORM: YOUR FIRM ABA 2019 2 776201 2017 TAX REFORM: YOUR FIRM ABA 2017 1 775860 2017 US EXPORT CONTROLS ABA 2019 2 775607 2018 SUPREME COURT TERM ABA 2018 2 775380 2018 TAX ACT: REAL ESTATE LWYR ABA 2018 2 784443 2019 CORONAVIRUS: PUB HEALTH ABA 2020 2 0 780047 2019 ESTATE PLANNING HOT TOPIC ABA 2019 2 0 784491 2019 PRIVATE TARGET DEAL POINT ABA 2020 2 0 784557 2020 E-DISCOVERY:ETHICS ABA 2020 2 1.2 784558 2020 E-DISCOVERY:FORENS DATA ABA 2020 4 0 785980 2020 ILS VAM BEWARE FINE PRINT ABA 2020 2 0 785983 2020
    [Show full text]
  • Experts Say Conway May Have Broken Ethics Rule by Touting Ivanka Trump'
    From: Tyler Countie To: Contact OGE Subject: Violation of Government Ethics Question Date: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:26:19 AM Hello, I was wondering if the following tweet would constitute a violation of US Government ethics: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/829356871848951809 How can the President of the United States put pressure on a company for no longer selling his daughter's things? In text it says: Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump My daughter Ivanka has been treated so unfairly by @Nordstrom. She is a great person -- always pushing me to do the right thing! Terrible! 10:51am · 8 Feb 2017 · Twitter for iPhone Have a good day, Tyler From: Russell R. To: Contact OGE Subject: Trump"s message to Nordstrom Date: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 1:03:26 PM What exactly does your office do if it's not investigating ethics issues? Did you even see Trump's Tweet about Nordstrom (in regards to his DAUGHTER'S clothing line)? Not to be rude, but the president seems to have more conflicts of interest than someone who has a lot of conflicts of interests. Yeah, our GREAT leader worrying about his daughters CLOTHING LINE being dropped, while people are dying from other issues not being addressed all over the country. Maybe she should go into politics so she can complain for herself since government officials can do that. How about at least doing your jobs, instead of not?!?!? Ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess it's just easier to do nothing, huh? Sincerely, Russell R. From: Mike Ahlquist To: Contact OGE Cc: Mike Ahlquist Subject: White House Ethics Date: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 1:23:01 PM Is it Ethical and or Legal for the Executive Branch to be conducting Family Business through Government channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H11279
    October 13, 2009 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H11279 So there are still a lot of good things that responsibility here to enable all that sit in these court cases, we spend being worked on. This bill gets better families in this country to have access our time making sure people’s rights and better by the day, and I believe we, and to be able to afford quality health are protected. And we have a whole se- again, are at a historic point here and care. ries of cases that establish rights of we are going to be able to just provide Thank you so much for bringing us criminal cases. Enough of you have stability and security to this country together, Representative PINGREE. watched television to know a lot in terms of our health care. And, to Ms. PINGREE of Maine. Well, thank about—we’re some of the most edu- me, we have to continue to sharpen our you to all my colleagues for being here cated, nonlawyers in the country, the pencils, as Representative TONKO says, tonight. You’re absolutely right. We’ve folks who watch television in the and continue to find ways to save with talked about a variety of issues, and I United States, because we know about this bill and also to provide even better want to just end on the same note that Miranda rights. So we know about care for citizens of all ages. you did. This is what is right about other rights. In other countries maybe Ms. PINGREE of Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Struggle with Corruption Hearing
    NIGERIA’S STRUGGLE WITH CORRUPTION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 18, 2006 Serial No. 109–172 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/international—relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 27–648PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 21 2002 12:05 Jul 17, 2006 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\AGI\051806\27648.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, HOWARD L. BERMAN, California Vice Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAN BURTON, Indiana ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American ELTON GALLEGLY, California Samoa ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BRAD SHERMAN, California PETER T. KING, New York ROBERT WEXLER, Florida STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts RON PAUL, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York DARRELL ISSA, California BARBARA LEE, California JEFF FLAKE, Arizona JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia EARL BLUMENAUER, Oregon MARK GREEN, Wisconsin SHELLEY BERKLEY, Nevada JERRY WELLER, Illinois GRACE F.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe
    ARTICLES RULE OF LAW IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Frank Emmert* [T]he Pursuit of Justice is itself the pursuit of happiness Ralph Nader1 INTRODUCTION The European Community for Coal and Steel (Paris, 1951), as well as the European Economic Community and the Euro­ pean Atomic Energy Community (Rome, 1957), were created first and foremost to secure peace and prosperity in Europe.2 Western Europe, to be precise, since the Central and Eastern European Countries ("CEECs") were already prevented from participating by the onset of the Cold War and their location in the part of Europe that Churchill had so generously ceded to ,Stalin in Moscow and Yalta in 1944 and 1945.3 * John S. Grimes Professor Law and Director of the Center for International & Comparative Law at Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis. The author was Dean of Concordia International University Estonia School of Law from 1998 to 2002 and a visiting professor at numerous law schools in Central & Eastern Europe and Cen­ tral Asia; since 1993, he has been an advisor to a number of governmental and private sector entities in Central and Eastern European Countries ("CEECs"), and a participant in or organizer of a variety of projects funded by the European Union ("EU"), the Council of Europe, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ("EBRO"), and others, for the promotion of rule of law in the region. Since 2007, the author is directing a large United States Agency for International Development ("USAID") project for the promotion of rule of law in Egypt, testing whether some of the lessons learned in the transformation in CEECs can be applied in other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Sports Law Journal 2005, No
    2005/3-4 The Pyramid and EC law Status of Players’ Agents Simutenkov Case IAAF Arbitration Panel CAS Ad Hoc Division in Athens An Irish CAS? Professional Sport in Poland Sports Image Rights Homegrown Players TV rights in Bulgarian Football Code of Ethics in Romania CMS Derks Star Busmann It’s pretty clear. As the keeper you have only one goal: to stop the balls whizzing past your ears. A flawless performance, that’s what it’s all about. On the ball, right through the match. With your eye on the defence. You have to focus on that one goal. And pounce on that one ball. Because keeping the score at nil is all that matters. ...on the ball. Being on the ball is just as important in business as in hockey. CMS Derks Star Busmann supports your business with full legal and fiscal services. A goal-focused and practical approach with you at the centre. Cases and faces is what CMS Derks Star Busmann is all about. Contact our sports law specialists Eric Vilé ([email protected]), Dolph Segaar ([email protected]) or Robert Jan Dil ([email protected]). www.cmsderks.nl CONTENTS Editorial 2 ARTICLES Is the Pyramid Compatible with EC Law? 3 The IAAF Arbitration Panel. The Heritage of Two Stephen Weatherill Decades of Arbitration in Doping-Related Disputes Christoph Vedder 16 The Laurent Piau Case of the ECJ on the Status of Players( Agents 8 The Ad Hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration Roberto Branco Martins for Sport at the Athens 2004 Olympic Games - An Overview 23 The Simutenkov case: Russian Players are Domenico Di Pietro Equal to European Union Players 13 Frank Hendrickx An ‘Irish Court of Arbitration for Sport’? 28 Michelle de Bruin PAPERS Professional Sport in Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring/Summer 2004
    TULANE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL TULANE VOL. 22 - NO.2 LAWYERSPRING/SUMMER 2004 THIS ISSUE GOOD SPORTS THE APOLITICAL CLINIC COMMENCEMENT 2004 CONTENTS 20 GOOD SPORTS Despite its big-money contracts, celebrity LAWRENCE PONOROFF athletes, and mega-endorsement deals, the business of sports law is more than simply DEAN “show me the money.” See how several alums handle the nuts and bolts of the job. ANN SALZER ASSISTANT DEAN ELLEN J. BRIERRE DIRECTOR OF ALUMNI AFFAIRS 26 COMMENCEMENT ’04 WINNIE BEUERMAN Graduation day in pictures DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT PAMBY LEVERT BARFIELD ASST. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT NICK MARINELLO 2 FROM THE DEAN EDITOR 4 BRIEFS H DESIGN CONSULTATION 10 FACULTY NOTEBOOK CONTRIBUTORS 15 PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS ADAM BABICH 28 CLASS NOTES HUGH DASCHBACH ROBERT FORCE 38 REUNIONS PAM MICHIELS (L ’90) MARY MOUTON (L ’90) 40 TAX TOPICS LIZBETH TURNER (L ’85) On the cover —Tulane lawyers stack the SPRING/SUMMER 2004 deck of the sport law biz. Illustration by Michael Krider. TULANE LAWYER is published by the Tulane Law School and is sent to the school’s alumni, faculty, staff and friends. TULANE LAWYER SEND ADDRESS CHANGES TO: Alumni Development and Information Services, “ ... to be a good sports lawyer, you have to be a good broad-based lawyer. 3439 Prytania St., Ste. 400, New Orleans, LA 70115. You have sports clients, but you are dealing with business enterprises, income tax, antitrust issues, labor law, and intellectual property.” 1 Tulane University is an Affirmative Action/Equal Employment Opportunity institution. FROM THE DEAN GROWTH AND RENEWAL Dean Lawrence Ponoroff with Rose LeBreton (L ’76), chair of the New Orleans alumni chapter, and BY DEAN LAWRENCE PONOROFF Maj.
    [Show full text]