DOCSLIB.ORG

We Cannot Wait: a Call for Law Students to Ensure “Nobody Is Above the Law”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
We Cannot Wait: a Call for Law Students to Ensure “Nobody Is Above the Law” April 20, 2018 We Cannot Wait: A Call for Law Students to Ensure “Nobody is Above the Law” We came to law school to do justice, to bring positive change to our communities. As law students, we know the time to do what is right does not begin when we pass the bar. That commitment to action began on our first day of law school, when we committed to the special responsibility society confers upon lawyers: to be leaders. Like us, you may have joined the legal profession to continue the march of liberty, pick up the torch of progress for a more just world and taking on Dr. King’s call to be a “drum major for justice.” In the past two years we have seen lawyers and our fellow law students rise to this call, flooding airports to protest the Muslim Ban, meeting immigrants’ rights and womens’ rights activists in protest and solidarity, standing up for DACA recipients in the courts, and documenting the rise of hate groups following Charlottesville. Now, again, is the time to answer that call. We stand at a crossroads. Lawyers are the voice of the law. As future leaders of our profession, we have a special responsibility to protect a core of our legal system: rule of law. We cannot do that if our highest official, the President of the United States, refuses to respect the law in the United States. Any attempt by the President to fire Special Counsel Mueller or Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein in order to derail Mueller’s investigation would be tantamount to declaring that he—and anyone able to wield power and privilege—is untouchable by law enforcement and above accountability to the people. The President’s actions would render the promise of our Constitution meaningless, the Declaration of Independence’s charge that “all men are created equal,” a mere paper promise. We cannot wait for our elected officials to act. How we respond today will determine what kind of future we will inherit. As law students, the future of the law, justice, and the rule of the law are in our hands. Our actions today determine if we will remain a country of laws or a country where one man can hold himself above the law. We must meet the moment. We cannot stand by if the President attempts to circumvent the Special Counsel. As ACS members we have taken on the obligation to ensure the law is a force to improve the lives of all. Today we act on our obligation. As Learned Hand said, if we are to keep our democracy, there must be one commandment: Thou shalt not ration justice. We commit today to protect our democracy from a fatal challenge to the rule of law. If the Special Counsel or Deputy Attorney General is fired, we will find our voice and use it. Commit to joining us by signing this letter. Gather your law school and legal community to protect our laws by committing to join a Nobody is Above the Law Rally at the moment the President acts. You can begin now, by finding or organizing a local action. Make a plan today. What will you do when you hear the news? How will you protect the rule of law? Sarah Mahmood, Stanford Law School ‘19, ACS Co-President 2017-2018 Sophia Carrillo, Stanford Law School ‘18, ACS Co-President 2016-2017, Next Generation Leader 1899 L Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20036 | 202.393.6181 | [email protected] | acslaw.org Aaron Wynhausen University of Missouri School of Law 2019 Abby Goreham Indiana University Maurer School of Law 2018 Adam DeSantis Northwestern University Pritkzer School of Law 2019 Addison Fairchild University of Nebraska College of Law 2019 Adil Yaqoob Vanderbilt University Law School 2018 Ajinkya Joshi Northwestern University Pritkzer School of Law 2020 Alex Ault University of Michigan Law School 2019 Alex Shrove Chicago-Kent College of Law 2018 Alexander Dickinson University of Pennsylvania Law School 2020 Alexander Haddad Case Western Reserve University School of Law 2020 Alexander Rosselli Indiana University Maurer School of Law 2019 Alexandra George Chicago-Kent College of Law 2019 Alexandra Harris University of South Carolina School of Law 2018 Alexis J Denniston University of Kentucky College of Law 2019 Alexis Lazzeri UC Hastings College of the Law 2020 Alivia Hatten Northern Illinois University College of Law 2019 Allison Horwitz University of Michigan Law School 2019 Amanda Christine Vela Georgia State University College of Law 2020 Amer Abukhdeir Georgia State University College of Law 2020 Anderson Paul Beals Willamette University College of Law 2020 Andres F Morelli SJ Quinney College of Law - University of Utah 2018 Andrew Brashler Chicago-Kent College of Law 2020 Andrew Francus The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law 2018 Andrew J Gasdick University of Minnesota Law School 2018 Andrew Schrag University of Virginia School of Law 2020 Anela Hadzic Northern Kentucky University Salmon P. Chase College of Law 2019 Anna Corbett Chicago-Kent College of Law 2020 AnnMargaret Shea New York Law School 2020 Arianna Cook-Thajudeen Notre Dame Law School 2018 Arielle Mourrain Stanford Law School 2020 Arielle Tolman Northwestern University Pritkzer School of Law 2018 Arlene Montgomery American University Washington College of Law 2020 Ashley Lawrence Howard University School of Law 2018 Austin Jaspers University of Kansas School of Law 2019 Austin R. Shopbell UC Hastings College of the Law 2020 Ava Gerami University of Virginia School of Law 2020 Bailey Whitsitt Loyola University Chicago School of Law 2020 Baili Volluz American University Washington College of Law 2019 Ben W Chang University of Texas School of Law 2019 Benjamin de Seingalt Tulane University Law School 2019 Benjamin Jackson Chicago-Kent College of Law 2020 2 Benjamin Phillips UC Berkeley School of Law 2020 Bethany Walters University of Dayton School of Law 2019 Bradley Cole McDaniel UNT Dallas College of Law 2019 Bradie Williams University of Pennsylavania Law School 2019 Brady Williams UC Berkeley School of Law 2019 Brandon Magner University of Kentucky College of Law 2018 Bree Gabriella Brydenthal Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State 2019 University Brennan McGee Santa Clara University School of Law 2018 Brian Garcia Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State 2020 University Brian Yates Umana The George Washington University Law School 2020 Briana Echols University of Virginia School of Law 2020 Bridget C Lawson Willamette University College of Law 2020 Brittany Martin The University of Iowa College of Law 2020 Brittany Smith UC Hastings College of the Law 2019 Brittany Triggs University of Cincinnati College of Law 2019 Brock Facione Southern University Law Center 2019 Bryan Reines Stanford Law School 2020 Bryan Thomson Stanford Law School 2020 Bryant Plank Marquette University Law School 2020 Caitlin Wightman University of Denver Sturm College of Law 2020 Cara Reichard Yale Law School 2020 Caroline Spalding University of Missouri School of Law 2019 Carrie Hill The University of Akron School of Law 2019 Carter Reed University of Nebraska College of Law 2020 Cary Bruner Texas A&M University School of Law 2018 Casey L. Chalbeck Georgetown University Law Center 2020 Cassandra Green Michigan State University College of Law 2018 Cassie Maneen University of Houston Law Center 2020 Catherine Cochrane Case Western Reserve University School of Law 2020 Charles Isaacs Northwestern University Pritkzer School of Law 2020 Charles Lyons SJ Quinney College of Law - University of Utah 2020 Charles Niemann University of Minnesota Law School 2019 Charles Schully Tulane University Law School 2018 Chelsea Straus UCLA School of Law 2019 Chnequa Kirby UNT Dallas College of Law 2020 Chris Page University of Nebraska College of Law 2019 Christiana Zgourides University of Virginia School of Law 2020 Christina Beeler University of Houston Law Center 2018 Christopher Kanelos Georgia State University College of Law 2019 Christopher Gerardi Chicago-Kent College of Law 2018 3 Christopher R. Henderson Quinnipiac University School of Law 2020 Christopher Smith Duke University School of Law 2020 Claire Debucquois Columbia Law School 2018 Claire Henleben Loyola University Chicago School of Law 2020 Clara Kent Columbia Law School 2019 Clara S. Acosta Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State 2019 University Cliff Gleaves University of Oregon School of Law 2020 Cody Ledford Wake Forest University School of Law 2020 Colt Burnett Georgia State University College of Law 2019 Conor Kelly The George Washington University Law School 2020 Courtney Koelbel University of Virginia School of Law 2017 Crystal Abreu Roger Williams University School of Law 2019 Dan Hales University of Miami School of Law 2018 Dan Lewis University of Illinois College of Law 2019 Dan Sullivan The University of Chicago Law School 2018 Dan Weston UC Hastings College of the Law 2020 Daniel Cohen Northwestern University Pritkzer School of Law 2018 Daniel Gauthier Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State 2018 University Daniel H. Galindo UC Hastings College of the Law 2018 Daniel Passon University of Toledo College of Law 2020 Daniel Rife University of Minnesota Law School 2020 Danielle Sayegh Fordham University School of Law 2018 Darrelyn Thomas Georgia State University College of Law 2018 Darrian V Nelson University of Baltimore School of Law 2018 David Alcius Florida A&M College of Law 2018 David Alpert Columbia Law School 2020 David G. Crockett, Jr. Columbia Law School 2018 David McGee American University Washington College of Law 2019 David Roper The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law 2019 David Stewart University of Cincinnati College of Law 2020
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1A APPENDIX LIST of AMICI CURIAE Janet
    1a APPENDIX LIST OF AMICI CURIAE Janet Ainsworth John D. Eshelman Professor of Law Seattle University (affiliation for identification purposes only) Gerald G. Ashdown James H. & June M. Harmless Professor of Law West Virginia University College of Law Hadar Aviram Harry and Lillian Hastings Research Chair President, Western Society of Criminology UC Hastings College of the Law Catherine Greene Burnett Professor of Law South Texas College of Law Houston Arthur W. Campbell Professor of Law California Western School of Law Bennett Capers Stanley A. August Professor of Law Brooklyn Law School Jenny E. Carroll Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis Professor of Law University of Alabama School of Law Kami N. Chavis Associate Provost and Professor of Law Director of the Criminal Justice Program Wake Forest University School of Law 1b Thomas K. Clancy Research Professor, Emeritus University of Mississippi School of Law Geoffrey S. Corn Vinsen & Elkins Professor of Law Lieutenant Colonel (Retired), U.S. Army South Texas College of Law Houston Daniel T. Coyne Clinical Professor of Law IIT/Chicago-Kent College of Law J. Amy Dillard Associate Professor of Law University of Baltimore Law School Joshua Dressler Distinguished University Professor Emeritus Frank R. Strong Chair in Law Emeritus Michael E. Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University Steven Duke Professor of Law Yale Law School Marc D. Falkoff Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law Northern Illinois University College of Law Ian P. Farrell Associate Professor of Law The University of Denver Sturm College of Law Todd D. Fernow Professor of Law University of Connecticut School of Law 1c Brian Gallini Professor of Law Senior Associate Dean for Research & Faculty Development Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall General Meeting - October 18Th Bership Mtg
    UNIVERSITY O F D E N V E R DU RETIREES U P C O M I N G R E T I R E E VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3 SEPTEMBER, 2017 EVENTS October 18: General Mem- Fall General Meeting - October 18th bership Mtg. Speaker: You and a guest are invited to the Fall Howard DU Retirees General Meeting! Markman Join former colleagues and friends for March 21: a presentation by Howard Markman. Spring Lunch- Dr. Markman’s topic will be Relation- eon. Speaker: ships. Art Bouton Date: Wednesday October 18th June 13: Sum- mer Barbeque Time: 1:30 p.m at the Wellshire Place: Gottesfeld Room, Ritchie Ctr Events Center RSVP: To attend, respond by October 12th to Carole Burgess. Email Howard J. Markman, Ph.D. [email protected]. or call (303) B O A R D Co-Director of the Center for MEMBERS 871-3268 and leave a message. Let Carole know if you need free parking, Marital and Family Studies Pam Whitt, and she will send you parking informa- Chairperson tion and a permit. To reach the Gottesfeld Room, take the elevators nearest the West (Main) Diane Wendt, Those with special needs, please Vice Chair entrance to the 4th floor. Turn right phone Lloyd Moore at 303-871-4284 to just past the reception desk. This Carole Burgess, make arrangements. Secretary hallway will lead you to the room. Andy Divine New Schedule for the Spring Luncheon! Ruth Fanslow Roscoe Hill The 2018 Spring Luncheon will be held on March 21, 2018 and will include a speaker, Art Bouton.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyering Process Program
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER STURM COLLEGE OF LAW Lawyering Process Program 2016 LP Presentations Robert Anderson • “Reaching the Limits of a Policy Argument, and Giving the Client the Bad News,” at the Fifth Annual Western Regional Legal Writing Conference, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles (August 2015). • “Program Leadership,”at LWI One-Day Workshop, Sturm College of Law, Denver (December 2015). • “Knowing When No is No: Teaching Students How to Determine When the Answer to a Legal Research Question is No (and How to Tell the Client),” at 2016 Biennial Conference of the Legal Writing Institute, Portland, Ore. (July 2016). Debra Austin • “Brain Power: The Neuroscience of Cognition, Stress, Self-medication, and Brain Health,” at Wyoming Trial Lawyers Association Convention, Cody, Wyo. (June 2015). • “Don’t Forget the Brain: Using Neuroscience Developments to Humanize Legal Education,” Association of Legal Writing Directors Conference, University of Memphis Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, Memphis, Tenn. (June 2015). • “Zen and the Artistry of the Emotionally Regulated Advocate” (with Rob Durr, PhD), at Psychology of Persuasion Conference, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyo. (September 2015). • “Writing Professors as Scholars” (with Ken Chestek and David Thomson), at LWI One-Day Workshop, University of Denver (December 2015). • “Brain-Boosting Nutrition,” at the Southeastern Legal Writing Conference, University of Miami (January 2016). • Panelist, “Lawyer Balance and Wellbeing,” at Rhone Brackett Inn of Court, Denver, Colo. (February 2016). • “Reinvigorate your Brain with Neuroscience-Inspired Eating,” at the Rocky Mountain Legal Writing Conference, University of Arizona (March 2016). • “Judicial Wellness,” at the 2016 Kansas Judicial Conference, Wichita, Kan. (June 2016). • “Craving Comfort Food and Cocktails? The Neuroscience of Nutrition for Optimal Brain Health and Agile Aging,” at the Legal Writing Institute Conference, Portland, Ore.
    [Show full text]
  • HIRO N. ARAGAKI Loyola Law School 919 Albany St
    HIRO N. ARAGAKI Loyola Law School 919 Albany St. Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211 phone: (213) 736-1406 • e-mail: [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Loyola Law School – Los Angeles, CA Associate Professor of Law (2011 – present) Teaching: Contract Law & Drafting; Alternative Dispute Resolution; Negotiation Other Teaching Interests: Commercial Arbitration (int’l & domestic); Civil Procedure; International Business Transactions; Mediation; Conflict of Laws; Dispute Systems Design; Law & Development Fordham University Schools of Business – New York, NY Assistant Professor of Law & Ethics (2007 – 2011) Tenure-track appointment. Courses included: “The Legal Framework of Business” and “International Business Transactions.” Also taught topics in civil procedure, business associations, remedies, intellectual property. PUBLICATIONS & WORKS IN PROGRESS Scholarly Works The Federal Arbitration Act as Procedural Reform, 89 N.Y.U. L. REV. __ (2014) (forthcoming) Won “Honorable Mention” in 2013 AALS Scholarly Paper Competition Selected for presentation at 2014 Branstetter New Voices in Civil Justice Workshop, Vanderbilt Law School AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion and the Antidiscrimination Theory of Federal Arbitration Act Preemption, 4 PENN ST. Y.B. ARB. & MED. 39 (2013) (peer-reviewed journal; solicited submission) Equal Opportunity for Arbitration, 58 UCLA L. REV. 1189 (2011) Selected for presentation at the 2011 Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum Arbitration’s Suspect Status, 159 U. PA. L. REV. 1233 (2011) The Mess of Manifest Disregard, 119 YALE L.J. ONLINE* 1 (2009) [*formerly the YLJ Pocket Part] Deliberative Democracy as Dispute Resolution? Conflict, Interests, and Reasons, 24 OHIO STATE J. ON DISP. RESOL. 406 (2009) Communicative Ethics and the Morality of Discourse, 13 PRAXIS INT’L 154 (1993) Scholarly Works-in-Progress Shifting Conceptions of Freedom in Modern Arbitration Jurisprudence Other Works Amicus Curiae Brief of Law Professors on Rehearing En Banc in Support of Petitioners, in Kilgore v.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Call to Censure the President
    S. HRG. 109–524 AN EXAMINATION OF THE CALL TO CENSURE THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 31, 2006 Serial No. J–109–66 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 28–341 PDF WASHINGTON : 2006 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHN CORNYN, Texas CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MICHAEL O’NEILL, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:36 Aug 16, 2006 Jkt 028341 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\28341.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S. Senator from the State of Texas ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Virginians, Five Generations Ago, My Ancestors Were Freed from the Shackles of Slavery
    REFORMING OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Dear Virginians, Five generations ago, my ancestors were freed from the shackles of slavery. Just two generations ago, my grandfather, one of Virginia’s first Black lawyers, was forced by Jim Crow to obtain his law degree in the north. And my father was one of the first to integrate his elementary school in 1960. As I travel throughout the Commonwealth and stand as an elected official in the former capital of the Confederacy, I often wonder how my ancestors would feel, and what they would think, about their descendant who has the opportunity to be Virginia’s first Black Attorney General. I’m running for Attorney General because we’ve made progress in building a more fair and equitable Virginia, but we all know we have not come far enough. The vestiges of slavery and Jim Crow live on in our Commonwealth’s criminal code, in our judicial system, and in our policing. They criminalize Black and Brown communities and make every Virginian less safe. In order to embrace the new Virginia decade, we must build a justice system that works for everybody in our Commonwealth, not just a select few. We have arrived at a true moment of opportunity in our country and in our Commonwealth. We must elect leaders who will rise to that moment and seize the chance to create real change in our justice system, rather than continuing with those who have proven time and time again that they will only do the bare minimum to get by. For his entire career, Mark Herring has shown that he will follow when he has to, but he will not lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 1967 – 50Th Reunion Schedule of Events
    Class of 1967 – 50th Reunion Schedule of Events Friday June 9, 2017 1:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Registration Ricketson Law Building, Sturm College of Law Forum 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. 50th Reunion Induction Ceremony Ricketson Law Building, Sturm College of Law Forum At this special event, Class of 1967 members will be officially inducted into Pioneer Alumni Legends (PALs), made up of alumni who graduated 50 or more years ago. The ceremony will take place during the annual Emeritus Tea, a highlight of the weekend. Business casual attire. 3:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Campus Tours Leaving from Ricketson Law Building Enjoy a walking tour of campus with fellow alumni and see how the campus has changed since you were a student. A limited number of golf carts will be available for those needing assistance. 4:30 – 5:15 p.m. Anderson Academic Commons Tour Anderson Academic Commons Enjoy a tour of the new library and Academic Commons including a display of special DU memorabilia items from the 1960’s. 5:30 p.m. Class of 1967 Group Photo Ricketson Law Building front steps A group photo will be taken of you and your classmates. 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. Class of 1967 Reunion Dinner Ricketson Law Building, Sturm College of Law Forum Over dinner, reconnect with old friends and reminisce about your days at DU with new friends. You’ll have an opportunity to share your favorite DU memories and where you are today with the group while listening to classic 1960’s music.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Vita Joyce Sterling
    PROFESSIONAL VITA JOYCE STERLING University of Denver Sturm College of Law 2255 E. Evans Avenue, 330K Denver, Co. 80208-0640 (303) 871-6309 Email: [email protected] EXPERIENCE: UNIVERSITY OF DENVER STURM COLLEGE OF LAW PROFESSOR OF LAW, 1987 – Present. ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR FACULTY SCHOLARSHIP, 2014 to present Associate Professor, 1981-1987 Assistant Professor, 1978-1981 Recipient, Carnegie Integrated Course Stipend , for Scientific Evidence course (incorporating experiential learning as an integral part of the course), Summer 2012 Research Professor, University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Spring 2012 Visiting Professor , Southwestern Law School, Los Angeles, Ca. Fall 2008 Visiting Fellow, American Bar Foundation, Chicago, Il. , Academic Year 2002-2003 Hughes Research Professor, University of Denver College of Law, 2000-2001 Visiting Professor, Law School, University of Cincinnati, Fall 1990 Hughes Research Professor, University of Denver College of Law, 1987-1988 National Endowment for the Humanities, Summer Fellowship for Law Teachers, Program at Stanford University in Constitutional History, Summer 1987 Visiting Scholar, Law School, Stanford University 1985- 1986 National Endowment for the Humanities, Summer Fellowship for Law Teachers. Program at Stanford University Law School in American Legal History, Summer 1982. Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Denver College of Law, 1977-1978. 1 Teaching in the areas of Legal Profession (ethics), Scientific Evidence, History of American Law, Law and Society, and Torts EDUCATION: Ph.D. University of Denver, Sociology, 1977. Dissertation: “Criminal Justice Processing: The Determinants of the Decision to go to Trial.” M.A. University of Hawaii, Sociology, 1970. Thesis: “Teacher Organization Participation.” B.A. University of California at Santa Barbara, June 1967, Sociology SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS Joyce S.
    [Show full text]
  • Q&A with Baylor Law Judges
    SPRING ‘15 SCHOOL OF LAW One Bear Place #97288 Waco, TX 76798-7288 Baylor Law is committed to being one of the smallest law schools in the nation. With a total Established in 1857, student body of 383 (fall 2014), we are able to Baylor Law School offer more personalized attention to each student. is ranked third TOTAL PROFILE OF in the nation for STUDENT BODY ENTERING CLASS advocacy by U.S.News FALL 2014 FALL 2014 & World Report. TOTAL ENTERING STUDENTS STUDENTS Every year, Baylor Law 383 83 students achieve one of 58% 42% 75th/25th the highest bar passage MEN WOMEN GPA - 3.71/3.38 (Median 3.55) rates in the country and 75th/25th enjoy an excellent career LSAT - 163/158 placement rate. (Median 160) WITH Q&A WITH BAYLOR LAW JUDGES + BAYLOR LAW JUDGES ACROSS THE NATION VOLUME 127 | SPRING ‘15 BAYLOR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW MAGAZINE 4 Dean’s Letter 16 Alumni Notes 18 Student Notes 21 Commencement Photos 22 Faculty Notes 23 Adjunct Faculty Profiles 26 Obituaries 28 Out & Abouts 30 Back in Time © Baylor University School of Law. All Rights Reserved. VOLUME 127 | SPRING ‘15 BAYLOR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW MAGAZINE 4 Dean’s Letter 16 Alumni Notes 18 Student Notes 21 Commencement Photos 22 Faculty Notes 23 Adjunct Faculty Profiles 26 Obituaries 28 Out & Abouts 30 Back in Time © Baylor University School of Law. All Rights Reserved. A Message Docket Call is published by the Baylor University from Dean Toben School of Law for its alumni, faculty, staff, students, supporters, and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor C. Raj Kumar Professor & Vice Chancellor O.P
    Curriculum Vitae PROFESSOR C. RAJ KUMAR PROFESSOR & VICE CHANCELLOR O.P. JINDAL GLOBAL UNIVERSITY Tel: (+91-130) 4091900; Fax: (+91-130) 4091888 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Website: www.jgu.edu.in I. CURENT AFFILIATION (since 2009) Vice Chancellor, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) Dean, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) Director, International Institute for Higher Education Research & Capacity Building, Sonipat, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) II. EDUCATION Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Doctor of Legal Science (S.J.D.), 2011 Harvard Law School, United States of America LL.M. (Master of Laws), 2000. University of Oxford, United Kingdom B.C.L. (Bachelor of Civil Law), 1999. Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India LL.B. (Bachelor of Laws), 1997. Loyola College, University of Madras, India B.Com. (Bachelor of Commerce), 1994. III. AWARDS/SCHOLARSHIPS/FELLOWSHIPS (ANNEX I) Scholarships and fellowships awarded by the University of Oxford, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Loyola College, University of Madras, Monash University and Indiana University. IV. RESEARCH GRANTS/FUNDS (ANNEX II) Received research grants and funds from various educational and research institutions, foundations, and inter-governmental organisations including City University of Hong Kong; Sumitomo Foundation, Tokyo, Japan; and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). V. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Passed the New York Bar Exam (July 2001) and was admitted to the Bar of the State of New York, U.S.A., as an Attorney and Counsellor at Law in February 2002; admitted to the Bar Council of Delhi, New Delhi, India, in August 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendee Handout Packet 7.30.2020 AAM Webinar
    Association of Attorney-Mediators Webinar - Confidentiality in the Age of Online Mediations: Points to Ponder July 30, 2020 On July 30, 2020, from 11:30 a.m. to 12:45 p.m., the Association of Attorney Mediators will be presenting a webinar during which a moderator and four panelists will discuss the issues of confidentiality and discoverability that come with conducting mediations on platforms such as Zoom, with participants often in different states with different laws that govern mediation confidentiality. The panelists and moderator are from across the United States, as will be the attendees. The following panel members will discuss the enforceability of Confidentiality Agreements, the conflicts of laws principles that arise with multi-state mediations, the potential liability for confidentiality breaches of which mediators must be aware, and other salient issues. Panelists will be Danielle Hargrove, Jeff Kichaven, Jean Lawler and Michael Leech. Panel will be moderated by AAM President, Jimmy Lawson. Agenda 11:30-11:35: Welcome and Introduction of Panel Jimmy Lawson, Moderator 11:35-11:45: Brief synopsis of the substance of Kichaven’s articles Jeff Kichaven, Panelist 11:45-12:45 Discussion of mediation confidentiality. Various questions will be asked of the panel for discussion Table of Contents Speakers Bios Pages 2-3 Article: Mediator Confidentiality Promises Carry Serious Risks Pages 4-6 Article: What You Say In Online Mediation May Be Discoverable Pages 7-12 Article: Nix Your Mediators Prospective Waiver Of Liability Pages 13-16 1 Association of Attorney-Mediators Webinar - Confidentiality in the Age of Online Mediations: Points to Ponder Speakers and Panelists – July 30, 2020 Danielle L.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Back to Go Forward: Remaking Detainee Policy*
    Looking Back to Go Forward: Remaking U.S. Detainee Policy* by James M. Durant, III, Lt Col USAF Deputy Head, Department of Law United States Air Force Academy Frank Anechiarico Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law United States Air Force Academy Maynard-Knox Professor of Government and Law Hamilton College [WEB VERSION] April, 2009 © James Durant, III, Frank Anechiarico * This article does not reflect the views of the Air Force, the United States Department of Defense, or the United States Government. “By mid-1966 the U.S. government had begun to fear for the welfare of American pilots and other prisoners held in Hanoi. Captured in the midst of an undeclared war, these men were labeled war criminals. .Anxious to make certain that they were covered by the Geneva Conventions and not tortured into making ‘confessions’ or brought to trial and executed, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large Averell Harriman asked [ New Yorker correspondent Robert] Shaplen to contact the North Vietnamese.” - Thomas Bass (2009) ++ Introduction This article, first explains why and how detainee policy as applied to those labeled enemy combatants, collapsed and failed by 2008. Second, we argue that the most direct and effective way for the Obama Administration to reassert the rule of law and protect national security in the treatment of detainees is to direct review and prosecution of detainee cases to U.S. Attorneys and adjudication of charges against them to the federal courts. The immediate relevance of this topic is raised by the decision of the Obama Administration to use the federal courts to try Ali Saleh Kahah al-Marri in a (civilian) criminal court.
    [Show full text]