DOCSLIB.ORG

Are Life Settlement Securitizations the New Trend?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Are Life Settlement Securitizations the New Trend? OCTOBER 2009 INVESTING IN DEATH: ARE LIFE SETTLEMENT SECURITIZATIONS THE NEW TREND? By John P. Cleary, Esq. plummet because the risk was Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch diversified. Of course, sponsors of these LLP securities did not account for a nationwide meltdown in housing prices Although Wall Street is still littered with and tightening of credit for even the the aftermath of the mortgage disaster, most qualified borrowers needing to investment bankers already anticipate a refinance. When that happened, return to the heady days of hefty fees investors lost hundreds of billions of through securitization and trading of a dollars. new asset class – life settlements. To be Whether securitized life settlement sure, these investments are a bit contracts will take off may depend on macabre because a favorable return on how credit rating agencies measure the investment is dependent upon the level of risk. As with any securitized untimely death of another human being. bond, a credit agency must rate the However, they are legal and their bond. The less predictable the outcome popularity is on the rise. Investment of the investment, the tougher it is to JOHN P. CLEARY advisors and broker‐dealers have rate. Investment banks structuring noticed increased interest in life these pools of risk and credit agencies settlement investments and large rating them will need to get a comfort investment banks have begun the expectancy, the investor may receive a higher return. If the insured lives longer level on issues such as the average process of creating life settlement‐based human lifespan, factors contributing to derivative securities. than expected, the return will be lower. In sum, the purchaser is hoping and remission from disease, treatment WHAT IS A LIFE SETTLEMENT? banking on the insured's early demise. methodologies and drugs in the pipeline. To address this, life settlement Life settlements grew out of the viatical A RETURN TO THE GOOD OLD DAYS bonds likely will have policies from a industry that became popular in the Recently, the New York Times reported broad range of people with different 1980’s with many AIDS patients. A life diseases and varying ages. A life settlement is a secondary market there is now a strong demand for life settlement investments. Investment settlement bond with a mix of leukemia transaction on an insurance policy sufferers, those with heart disease and whereby an insured sells his insurance banks are planning to securitize life settlements in the same manner they individuals over 80 years old will policy to a third party investor for a provide a safer risk than, say, a bond lump sum purchase price. The key securitized mortgages before the collapse of the residential mortgage with a majority of breast cancer issues determining market value for a patients. This is because in the event a life insurance policy are the amount of securities market. Securitization is a financing method in which typically cure for breast cancer is found, the value the death benefit, the cost of premiums of the bond would sink. and the life expectancy of the insured. illiquid financial assets are pooled together and converted into securities In the face of increased interest in For the policy owner, a life settlement that may be offered and sold in the pooling life settlements, the insurance provides an alternative source of capital markets. Same as the industry is calling for tighter controls. liquidity to simply liquidating the policy securitization of mortgages, life Insurers understandably are concerned for the present cash value. Depending settlement securities will have different with a growing market for individuals on the age and health of the insured, an tranches representing different risk obtaining life insurance for the sole investor might pay 20 to 200 percent profiles. purpose of reselling it on the secondary more than the surrender value an Investment banks that sold residential market. Historically, a significant insurer would pay. The investor is percentage of policies have lapsed for obligated to continue paying the mortgage securities managed their risk by packaging individual mortgages into nonpayment of premiums, which avoids premiums on the policy and will receive payment of the death benefit. From the the death benefit upon the death of the tranches representing loans from different areas of the country and with insurers’ perspective, a hedge fund insured. The investor’s return depends sponsoring a pool of life settlements is upon the insured’s life expectancy and different borrower credit risks. The thinking was if the value of homes unlikely to let policies lapse, which will the actual date of death. If the insured lead to large payouts by insurers that dies before the estimated life declined in one area of the country, it would not cause the portfolio to might otherwise have been avoided. Copyright @2009 Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP. All rights reserved. www.procopio.com │ 1 LEGAL ISSUES WITH LIFE SETTLEMENTS However, the test failed on the third appropriately licensed to offer and sell element from W.J. Howey, that the securities. Last month, the Securities and Exchange investment be reliant on the “efforts of Commission (SEC) established a Life In connection with the solicitation of others.” The court found that the Settlements Task Force to examine policyholders to purchase their policies, investment did not involve a security emerging issues in the life settlements FINRA has identified certain necessary because the promoters’ efforts post‐ market. The Task Force is considering, disclosures such as unexpected tax purchase were to simply hold the policy, among other things, the application of liabilities, diminished insurable pay the premiums and wait for the the federal securities laws to life capacity, privacy issues and potentially insured to die. settlements, the issues relating to high commissions.3 FINRA is securitization of life settlements and Most courts have not followed the Life particularly concerned with brokers hedge fund offerings of life settlement‐ Partners ruling, either distinguishing the targeting policyholders who are based investments. Also, the Financial facts or explicitly rejecting the notion vulnerable to abusive sales practices, Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) that the post‐purchase efforts are including the elderly and seriously ill. It recently issued a Notice to Members in merely ministerial in nature. Also, in has warned brokers that their duties which it warned brokerage firms and 2004, the D.C. Circuit sided with the SEC include discussing alternatives to the fund managers of the regulatory and in shutting down a $1 billion offering by sale of their insurance policy if there is a compliance issues with life settlement a viatical settlement company, expressly need for cash, including borrowing investments. rejecting the Life Partners ruling. against the policy or invoking other contract features. Because many life Are Life Settlements Securities? In 2006, FINRA issued Notice to settlements may be securitized, brokers Members 06‐38 which stated that, at The question whether life settlement should ensure that a policyholder least for FINRA’s purposes, life investments meet the definition of a acknowledges and appreciates that their settlements involving variable insurance “security” under federal and state medical history and private health policies are securities. In July 2009, securities laws is crucial. If the information may be shared with and FINRA reiterated and expanded on this investment is a security, the person or monitored by strangers. view in Notice to Members 09‐42. entity offering an investment in a life FINRA stated that its jurisdiction Also, the benefits to an insured of selling settlement must meet the offering reaches to “a security that is an interest a life insurance policy must be weighed requirements of the Securities Act of in a single life policy, or a group or a against the transaction‐related costs of a 1933, as amended, and is liable for pool of such policies, whether variable life settlement, which are often violations of the antifraud provisions of or not.” substantial. Under NASD Rule 2440 (as the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted by FINRA), a firm is prohibited amended. In addition, those Accordingly, it will be safer to assume from charging a customer more than a participating in the marketing and that federal and state securities laws do fair and reasonable commission in any selling of life settlement investments apply to the purchase and sale of securities transaction. In addition, would be bound by the broker‐dealer interests in life settlements. Whether under FINRA Rule 2010, a firm that registration requirements under state the transaction involves an interest in charges an unfair commission violates and federal law. Finally, hedge fund one policy or the sale interests in a pool the firm’s obligation to observe just and operators and investment advisers of life settlements, investment equitable principles of trade in the dealing in life settlements would be professionals must be aware of and conduct of the firm’s business. bound to comply with the expensive and advised on applicable securities laws as Similarly, any fees a firm charges a time consuming requirements of the they relate to the structuring, customer must be reasonable. Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the marketing, offering and sale of these Investment Company Act of 1940. investments. As part of a firm’s suitability determination under NASD Rule 2310 As yet, the courts have not reached a Solicitation of Insureds for Life (as adopted by FINRA), the firm should uniform answer to this question. The Settlement Transactions ensure that policyholders understand first case, SEC v. Life Partners, Inc1., For brokerage firms considering life the tax treatment of the cash payment focused on whether participation in a settlement transactions, FINRA has when paid in a life settlement as life settlement investment is an taken the position this constitutes a compared to the tax treatment of the investment contract and therefore a material change in a firm’s business death benefit to the beneficiary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Share-Based Payments – IFRS 2 Handbook
    Share-based payments IFRS 2 handbook November 2018 kpmg.com/ifrs Contents Variety increases complexity 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Overview 8 3 Scope 15 4 Classification of share-based payment transactions 49 5 Classification of conditions 66 6 Equity-settled share-based payment transactions with employees 81 7 Cash-settled share-based payment transactions with employees 144 8 Employee transactions – Choice of settlement 161 9 Modifications and cancellations of employee share-based payment transactions 177 10 Group share-based payments 208 11 Share-based payment transactions with non-employees 257 12 Replacement awards in a business combination 268 13 Other application issues in practice 299 14 Transition requirements and unrecognised share-based payments 317 15 First-time adoption of IFRS 320 Appendices I Key terms 333 II Valuation aspects of accounting for share-based payments 340 III Table of concordance between IFRS 2 and this handbook 374 Detailed contents 378 About this publication 385 Keeping in touch 386 Acknowledgements 388 Variety increases complexity In October 2018, the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) published the results of its research project on sources of complexity in applying IFRS 2 Share-based Payment. The Board concluded that no further amendments to IFRS 2 are needed. It felt the main issues that have arisen in practice have been addressed and there are no significant financial reporting problems to address through changing the standard. However, it did acknowledge that a key source of complexity is the variety and complexity of terms and conditions included in share-based payment arrangements, which cannot be solved through amendments to the standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Collateralized Loan Obligations (Clos) July 2021 ASSET MANAGEMENT | FACT SHEET
    ® Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs) July 2021 ASSET MANAGEMENT | FACT SHEET Conning believes that CLOs are a compelling asset class for insurers in today’s market. As floating-rate securities, they offer income protection in varying market environments while also minimizing duration. At the same time, CLO securities (i.e. tranches) typically offer higher yields than similarly rated corporate bonds and other structured products. The asset class also provides strong capital preservation through structural protections and investor-oriented covenants. Historically, the CLO structure has proven to be extremely resilient through multiple market cycles. In fact there has never been a default in the AAA and AA -rated CLO debt tranches.1 Negative correlation to U.S. Treasury Bonds and low correlations to U.S. investment grade corporate bonds and equities present valuable diversification benefits. CLOs also offer an opportunity to access debt issuers that do not participate in the high-yield bond markets. How CLOs Work Team The CLO collateral manager purchases a portfolio of loans (typically 150-300) Andrew Gordon using the proceeds from the sale of CLO tranches (debt & equity). The interest Octagon, CEO earned from the loan collateral pool is used to pay the coupon to the CLO liabili- 37 years of experience ties. The residual cash flow, after paying the interest on the CLO liabilities and all expenses, is distributed to the holders of the CLO equity. Notably, loan portfolio Gretchen Lam, CFA losses are first absorbed by these equity investors. CLOs are typically rated by Octagon, Senior Portfolio Manager S&P, Moody’s and / or Fitch.
    [Show full text]
  • Banknote Automation WP
    IMX WHITE PAPER Banknote and Precious Metal Trading – The Case For Automation Greater regulation | More complex compliance | Fierce market competition IMX WHITE PAPER ABSTRACT Many banknote and precious metals businesses have already adopted an automated approach to managing operations. Indeed, such is the proliferation of automation in this sector today that any operator who has not yet switched to the rapid, accurate and efficient facilities of systems-based transaction and management could now be said to be at a serious competitive disadvantage. This paper explores the compelling reasons why a growing number of successful dealing businesses have embraced the advantages of automation. It sets out the principles of systems based transaction and management in terms of how these address the whole spectrum of business needs and governance, as well as the mounting demands of regulation and compliance in an increasingly complex sector. IMX WHITE PAPER THE EMERGING BUSINESS CLIMATE All banknote and precious metals trading businesses face emerging challenges and inherent risks. These range from foreign exchange (FX) to credit risk, operation and dealing control, sound governance and solid audit measures - all of which must be managed in order to create and sustain a profitable business. An essential tool in maintaining competitive advantage in today's global economic and regulatory climate is a robust automated solution that specifically addresses this intricate matrix of needs. It is certainly true that non-automated organisations find up-scaling more arduous to manage. As business expands and additional traders and cash room personnel are drafted in, it becomes increasingly difficult to track inventory manually as more people are buying and selling concurrently.
    [Show full text]
  • List of All Fees for the Securitytrustsm Reloadable Visa® Prepaid Card Issued by Republic Bank of Chicago, Member FDIC, Pursuant to a License from Visa U.S.A
    CARDHOLDER AGREEMENT List of all fees for the SecurityTRUSTSM Reloadable Visa® Prepaid Card issued by Republic Bank of Chicago, Member FDIC, pursuant to a license from Visa U.S.A. Inc. All Fees Amount Details Monthly usage Monthly Fee is $7.95. The Monthly Fee is waived for the first 60 days Monthly fee $7.95 after the initial load. The Monthly Fee is also waived if you receive direct deposits of $500.00 or more every 35 days. Add money Fee of up to $5.95 may apply when reloading your Card at Retail Locations, including Green Dot® and Visa ReadyLink reload agents. This Cash reload $5.95 fee is charged by the reload agent and is subject to change. Reload locations may be found at www.insightvisa.com. Fee of up to 5% of the amount of a check loaded through third party 5%, $5.00 applications may apply, subject to a $5.00 minimum. Service is subject to Mobile check load minimum third party terms and conditions. This fee is charged by a third party and is subject to change. Spend money Per purchase transactions None No fees are assessed for domestic purchase transactions. Bill pay available when you log in to your account at Bill payment None www.insightvisa.com. There is no charge to complete a bill pay transaction. There is no charge to originate or receive transfers between your Card Card to card transfer None and another Insight-branded or SecurityTRUSTSM-branded Card. Get cash You will not be charged a fee for cash withdrawals at “in-network” ATMs.
    [Show full text]
  • •Central Securities Depository •Creating Stock •Corporate Actions •Clearance and Settlement •Fixed Income Issues •M
    ® LIFE CYCLE OF A SECURITY explores the role of central securities depositories in the United States and global capital markets, with a particular focus on the part The Depository Trust Company (DTC) plays in launching new securities issues and providing the essential services that security issuers require. The guide explains the process of creating and dis tributing stocks and bonds in the primary and secondary markets,- the details of clearing and settling retail and institutional transac tions, and the sophisticated infrastructure that enables the seamless- payment of dividends and interest, smooth management of tender offers and other corporate actions, and essential risk protection in an increasingly global environment. LIFE CYCLE OF A SECU RITY LIFE CYCLE OF A SECU RITY If trading volume between countries WHAT’S AN justifies it, CSDs are frequently linked INTERNATIONAL CSD? Central Securities Depositories electronically, and have accounts with There are currently two International The certificate stops here. each other, so that securities can be Central Securities Depositories (ICSDs), both moved electronically between them. In located in Europe: Clearstream Banking in most cases, payment for those securities Luxembourg and Euroclear Bank in Belgium. In the quest to attract capital and make shares that an issuing corporation offers is usually handled between the trading Initially created to accommodate the their economies more vibrant, most for sale in one or more countries in addi- firms’ settlement banks rather than expanding market in Eurobonds—bonds countries with active capital markets tion to its home market. This approach through the CSD, though some CSDs issued in a different currency and sold in have central securities depositories allows the corporation, working with a are equipped to handle both transfer a different country than that of the issuer, (CSDs) to provide the custody and local depositary bank, to raise capital in and payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Liquidity and Monetary Policy Implementation -- Lessons from the Financial Crisis
    Morten L. Bech, Antoine Martin, and James McAndrews Settlement Liquidity and Monetary Policy Implementation—Lessons from the Financial Crisis • The U.S. dollar clearing and settlement 1.Introduction system performed dependably during the financial crisis, processing record volumes he U.S. dollar clearing and settlement system was little and values of trades executed in stressed Tnoticed during the recent financial crisis, mainly because financial markets. it performed dependably, processing record volumes and values of trades made in stressed financial markets.1 Its • Emergency policy measures employed by successful operation was in part a result of the collaborative the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity and efforts undertaken by stakeholders over decades to improve stability to the financial system during and risk management and operational resiliency. Under the smooth after the crisis had important effects on surface, though, the dollar clearing and settlement system settlement liquidity and thus on the efficiency experienced important changes during the crisis. of clearing and settlement system activity. This article focuses on the ease with which market participants can discharge their payment and settlement obligations. We denote this as settlement liquidity. Our main • The measures led to a substantial decrease interest is on the settlement liquidity of the Federal Reserve’s in daylight overdrafts extended by the Fedwire Funds Service, the major large-value payment system Federal Reserve and an improvement in in the United States. We discuss how to measure settlement payment settlement timing. liquidity, and document the evolution of some of its key drivers over time. In particular, we show how the policy measures • The reduction in overdrafts lowered the Federal aimed at achieving financial and economic stability during and Reserve’s credit risk while the earlier settlement after the financial crisis have had a major impact on settlement time suggested significant efficiency gains and diminished operational risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Income Clearing Corporation Mortgage-Backed Securities
    EFFECTIVE AS OF July 19, 2021 FIXED INCOME CLEARING CORPORATION MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES DIVISION CLEARING RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES RULE 1 – DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................. 5 RULE 2 - MEMBERS .................................................................................................................. 37 RULE 2A – INITIAL MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS ......................................................... 38 RULE 3 - ONGOING MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS ........................................................ 48 RULE 3A - CASH SETTLEMENT BANK MEMBERS............................................................. 60 RULE 4 – CLEARING FUND AND LOSS ALLOCATION ...................................................... 63 RULE 5 – TRADE COMPARISON............................................................................................. 79 RULE 6 – TBA NETTING ........................................................................................................... 84 RULE 7 – POOL COMPARISON AND OBLIGATIONS .......................................................... 86 RULE 8 – POOL NETTING AND EXPANDED POOL NETTING SYSTEMS ....................... 89 RULE 9 – POOL SETTLEMENT WITH THE CORPORATION .............................................. 91 RULE 10 – [RESERVED] ............................................................................................................ 96 RULE 11 – CASH SETTLEMENT .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Guide to Securities Lending
    3&"$)#&:0/%&91&$5"5*0/4 An Introduction to Securities Lending First Canadian Edition An Introduction to $IPPTFTFDVSJUJFTMFOEJOHTFSWJDFTXJUIBO Securities Lending JOUFSOBUJPOBMSFBDIBOEBEFUBJMFEGPDVT Mark C. Faulkner, Managing Director, Spitalfields Advisors Spitalfields Managing Director, Mark C. Faulkner, First Canadian Edition 5SVTUFECZNPSFUIBOCPSSPXFSTXPSMEXJEFJOHMPCBMNBSLFUT QMVTUIF64 BOE$BOBEB $*#$.FMMPOJTDPNNJUUFEUPQSPWJEJOHVOSJWBMMFETFDVSJUJFTMFOEJOH TFSWJDFTUP$BOBEJBOJOTUJUVUJPOBMJOWFTUPST8FMFWFSBHFOFBSMZZFBSTPG EFBMFSBOEUSBEJOHFYQFSJFODFUPIFMQDMJFOUTBDIJFWFIJHIFSSFUVSOTXJUIPVU Mark C. Faulkner, Managing Director DPNQSPNJTJOHBTTFUTFDVSJUZ 0VSTUSBUFHZJTUPNBYJNJ[FSFUVSOTBOEDPOUSPMSJTLCZGPDVTJOHJOUFOUMZPOUIF Spitalfields Advisors TUSVDUVSFBOEEFUBJMTPGFBDIMPBO5IBUJTXIZXFPGGFSBMFOEJOHQSPHSBNUIBUJT USBOTQBSFOU SJTLDPOUSPMMFEBOEEPFTOPUJNQFEFZPVSGVOETUSBEJOHBOEWBMVBUJPO QSPDFTT4PZPVDBOFYDFFEFYQFDUBUJPOT ■ (MPCBM$VTUPEZ ■ 4FDVSJUJFT-FOEJOH ■ 0VUTPVSDJOH ■ 8PSLCFODI ■ #FOFmU1BZNFOUT ■ 'PSFJHO&YDIBOHF &OBCMJOH:PVUP 'PDVTPO:PVS8PSME XXXDJCDNFMMPODPN XXXXPSLCFODIDJCDNFMMPODPN $*#$.FMMPO(MPCBM4FDVSJUJFT4FSWJDFT$PNQBOZJTBMJDFOTFEVTFSPGUIF$*#$BOE.FMMPOUSBEFNBSLT ______________________________ An Introduction to Securities Lending First Canadian Edition Mark C. Faulkner Spitalfields Advisors Limited 155 Commercial Street London E1 6BJ United Kingdom Published in Canada First published, 2006 © Mark C. Faulkner, 2006 First Edition, 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Liquidity and Monetary Policy Implementation—Lessons from the Financial Crisis
    Morten L. Bech, Antoine Martin, and James McAndrews Settlement Liquidity and Monetary Policy Implementation—Lessons from the Financial Crisis • The U.S. dollar clearing and settlement 1.Introduction system performed dependably during the financial crisis, processing record volumes he U.S. dollar clearing and settlement system was little and values of trades executed in stressed Tnoticed during the recent financial crisis, mainly because financial markets. it performed dependably, processing record volumes and values of trades made in stressed financial markets.1 Its • Emergency policy measures employed by successful operation was in part a result of the collaborative the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity and efforts undertaken by stakeholders over decades to improve stability to the financial system during and risk management and operational resiliency. Under the smooth after the crisis had important effects on surface, though, the dollar clearing and settlement system settlement liquidity and thus on the efficiency experienced important changes during the crisis. of clearing and settlement system activity. This article focuses on the ease with which market participants can discharge their payment and settlement obligations. We denote this as settlement liquidity. Our main • The measures led to a substantial decrease interest is on the settlement liquidity of the Federal Reserve’s in daylight overdrafts extended by the Fedwire Funds Service, the major large-value payment system Federal Reserve and an improvement in in the United States. We discuss how to measure settlement payment settlement timing. liquidity, and document the evolution of some of its key drivers over time. In particular, we show how the policy measures • The reduction in overdrafts lowered the Federal aimed at achieving financial and economic stability during and Reserve’s credit risk while the earlier settlement after the financial crisis have had a major impact on settlement time suggested significant efficiency gains and diminished operational risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Markit Credit Indices Primer
    Markit Credit Indices Primer Markit Credit Indices A Primer July 2014 1 Confidential. Copyright © 2013, Markit Group Limited. All rights reserved. www.markit.com Markit Credit Indices Primer Copyright © 2014 Markit Group Limited Any reproduction, in full or in part, in any media without the prior written permission of Markit Group Limited will subject the unauthorized party to civil and criminal penalties. Trademarks Mark-it™, Markit™, CDX™, LCDX™, ABX, CMBX, MCDX, SovX, Markit Loans™, Markit RED™, Markit Connex™, Markit Metrics™ iTraxx®, LevX® and iBoxx® are trademarks of Markit Group Limited. Other brands or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders and should be treated as such. Limited Warranty and Disclaimer Markit specifically disclaims any implied warranty or merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Markit does not warrant that the use of this publication shall be uninterrupted or error free. In no event shall Markit be liable for any damages, including without limitation, direct damages, punitive or exemplary damages, damages arising from loss of data, cost of cover, or other special, incidental, consequential or indirect damages of any description arising out of the use or inability to use the Markit system or accompanying documentation, however caused, and on any theory of liability. This guide may be updated or amended from time to time and at any time by Markit in its sole and absolute discretion and without notice thereof. Markit is not responsible for informing any client of, or providing any client with, any such update or amendment. 2 Copyright © 2014, Markit Group Limited. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. State Tobacco Settlement Revenue Securitizations
    U.S. State Tobacco Settlement Revenue Securitizations Joshua Cain The Leonard N. Stern School of Business Glucksman Institute for Research in Securities Markets Faculty Advisor: Robert Whitelaw April 3, 2017 1 I. INTRODUCTION Tobacco settlement securitizations, also known as tobacco bonds, are a class of securities backed by the ongoing payments from a 1998 civil settlement with U.S. tobacco companies. States began to issue these bonds in 2000, and, as the market for them matured, twenty states and territories (as well as some counties and cities in certain states), executed securitization transactions. Bloomberg quoted the size of this market as $34 billion as of May 2016. (Chappatta, 2016) Today, many of these bonds are distressed, with bond ratings well into non-investment grade, or "junk", territory. The underlying reason for this is relatively simple: the settlement payments that back the bonds have been significantly lower than forecasted, mostly due to faster declines in cigarette consumption than the forecasts assumed. However, the credit outlook varies widely from bond to bond. In 2015, for example, Moody's announced ratings actions on a number of tobacco bonds, issuing both upgrades and downgrades. (Moody's Global Credit Research, 2015) The ratings issued ranged all the way from Aaa (sf) (Moody's highest category for structured finance) to Caa1 (sf) (seven notches below investment-grade). Since all tobacco settlement securitizations are backed by the same underlying cash flow, differences in structure, mainly those that affect coverage and seniority/payment priority, are the primary source of this variance in credit quality. Clearly, the relative aggressiveness and complexity of different tobacco bonds has had a real effect on their economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Settlements Task Force Staff Report
    Life Settlements Task Force Staff Report to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission July 22, 2010 This is a report by the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Commission has expressed no view regarding the analysis, findings, or conclusions contained herein. Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 II. Life Settlements ............................................................................................................ 3 A. What is a Life Settlement ........................................................................................ 3 B. Size of the Life Settlements Market ........................................................................ 4 III. Current Practices in the Life Settlements Market ......................................................... 6 A. Market Intermediaries ............................................................................................. 7 1. Brokers and Providers ....................................................................................... 7 2. Life Expectancy Underwriters .......................................................................... 8 3. Trading Platforms ........................................................................................... 10 4. Secondary Market Companies ........................................................................ 10 B. Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI) ......................................................
    [Show full text]