DOCSLIB.ORG

Contamination with Ruthenium 106 Results of Soil Tests Carried out by the CRIIRAD Laboratory in the Environment of the Mayak Nuclear Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contamination with Ruthenium 106 Results of Soil Tests Carried out by the CRIIRAD Laboratory in the Environment of the Mayak Nuclear Site CRIIRAD report N°18-21 Valence, February 16th 2018 Ru-106 / Mayak Commission de Recherche et d’Information Indépendantes sur la Radioactivité 29 cours Manuel de Falla / 26000 Valence / France . 33 (0)4 75 41 82 50 / [email protected] Contamination with ruthenium 106 Results of soil tests carried out by the CRIIRAD laboratory in the environment of the Mayak nuclear site Editor: Bruno CHAREYRON, nuclear physics engineer, director of the CRIIRAD laboratory. Contact : [email protected] 1 / Context: need to document the "Mayak" hypothesis Following the detection of ruthenium 106 in the air of about 30 countries from late September to mid- October 2017, the origin of the source is still debated. Among the many assumptions, that of an "incident" on the nuclear site "Mayak" was considered by CRIIRAD in October1 and remains one of the strongest. This nuclear site is located in Russia, in the sector pointed by the modelizations of several institutes (even if it is not located in the most probable zone resulting from modelizations published on November 9th by the French IRSN and November2 10th by Ukrainian scientists). Given the extent of atmospheric contamination, the release of ruthenium 106 was necessarily very high. In its communication3 of November 9th, 2017, the IRSN for its part gave an estimate of 100 to 300 TBq or 100 000 to 300 000 billions becquerels. It is unlikely that such a large release will come from a facility designed to produce ruthenium 106 for medical purposes. The Mayak site is engaged in the reprocessing of spent fuel and the vitrification of highly radioactive waste, which leads to the regular release4 of ruthenium 106 to the atmosphere (2.23 billion becquerels of Ru-Rh106 in 2015 according to the annual report of the Mayak site). In the case of accidental releases in September 2017, it seems that only isotopes of ruthenium are involved. Uncontrolled releases involving only ruthenium have already occurred at similar facilities, for example, in 2001, at two vitrification plants at the spent fuel reprocessing plant at La Hague in France. During certain stages of treatment of highly radioactive solutions resulting from the dissolution of irradiated fuels, ruthenium is indeed in gaseous form (RuO4) which can easily, in the event of incidents, be massively released into the atmosphere, without other radioactive substances being released at the same time (in any case in such large quantities). RuO4 is not stable in air and decomposes to ruthenium dioxide (RuO2), in the form of very fine solid particles. 1 http://balises.criirad.org/pdf/cp_criirad_17-10-11_ru106-air.pdf 2 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/detection-ruthenium-106-2017-meteorological-analysis-sources-ivan/ 3 http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Actualites_presse/Actualites/Pages/20171109_Detection-Ruthenium-106-en-france-et-en- europe-resultat-des-investigations-de-l-IRSN.aspx#.WoQGCXzkV8w 4 In the context of "chronic" releases from the Mayak site, ruthenium 106 is not the dominant element in terms of rejected activity. According to 2015 official figures, releases of radioactive gases (argon 41, krypton 88, xenon 135) were 25,000 times higher. Ruthenium 106 / Mayak ? CHAREYRON - CRIIRAD 1 / 10 In 2017, the Mayak site obviously encountered technical difficulties pointed out by Nadezda Kutepova in October 2017. Since then, other clues have supported the "Mayak" hypothesis: The international commission5 of inquiry set up by Russia, validated, at its first meeting, on 31 January 2018 in Moscow, the order of magnitude6 of the accidental release of ruthenium 106 at a value of 100 TBq, ie 100 000 billion Becquerels. The technical difficulties encountered at the Mayak site were confirmed by the fact that the manufacturer told its customers, at the end of December, that it would not be able to fulfill a delivery contract for a highly radioactive cerium 144 source. This information was revealed by the Italian press and the French newspaper Le Figaro on 2 February. However, the manufacture of this source requires the reprocessing of spent fuel relatively "fresh". The international commission set up by Russia concluded that the ruthenium discharge, at the end of September 2017, corresponded to "fresh" spent fuel. It is based on the Ru 106 / Ru 103 isotopic composition measured7 in air in Austria, Czech Republic and Sweden. On the other hand, the Russian authorities claim that the inspections carried out on the Mayak site found no malfunction compared to normal technological processes. In addition, the results of ruthenium 106 air contamination analysis around Mayak, published by the Russian agency Rosguidromet, are comparable to those recorded in Romania and Ukraine. 2 / Objectives of the controls carried out by CRIIRAD Since October 2017, CRIIRAD has been trying to obtain samples of the surface layer of soils around nuclear sites in Russia that may be responsible for releases of ruthenium 106, especially around Mayak. Regarding the Mayak site, the CRIIRAD objectives were: Have independent measurements of ruthenium 106 fallout levels in the vicinity of the facility. Indeed, the ruthenium 106 fallout levels around Mayak, published by the Russian agency Rosguidromet8, did not show "strong fallout" (a few hundred Becquerels per square meter), and indicated a level of atmospheric contamination much lower than the one highlighted in Romania. CRIIRAD indicated in press releases9 dated 21 and 22 November 2017 that these results did not correspond to "extremely high" levels, but were of the same order of magnitude as those recorded in Romania, and could not be used to "Prove" that Mayak was the source of the discharge. Check current health risk levels for the local population around Mayak due to fallout. Half-life of ruthenium 106 is indeed relatively long (it takes a little more than a year for its radioactivity to be divided by two). Performing controls is important, including several months after the fallout, even though the measurements are more and more difficult to perform and interpret as you wait. Beyond the question of ruthenium 106, check the level of residual soil contamination around this site which has been the subject of serious accidents10 with massive releases to the atmosphere, particularly in 1957 and 1967. 5 http://en.ibrae.ac.ru/newstext/885/ 6However, the commission did not specify why it chose the low range of the IRSN estimate. 7See page 7 of http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Actualites_presse/Actualites/Documents/IRSN_Report-on-IRSN- investigations-of-Ru-106-in-Europe-in-october-2017.pdf 8 Rosguidromet Monthly Report for September 2017 http://www.criirad.org/accident-et- pollutions/X0%20byulleten_rorf_09_2017.pdf 9 http://www.criirad.org/accident-et-pollutions/2017-11-21_cp_mise%20au%20point_1.pdf and http://www.criirad.org/accident-et-pollutions/2017-11-22_cp_mise%20au%20point_2.pdf 10 http://www.criirad.org/installations-nucl/Mayak/CRIIRAD_Mayak_Kyshtym_Tcheliabinsk.pdf Ruthenium 106 / Mayak ? CHAREYRON - CRIIRAD 2 / 10 The realization of independent controls was all the more useful as the communication of the first Russian commission of inquiry raised many questions mentioned in the CRIIRAD statement11 of 20 December 2017. 3 / A preliminary campaign on the west of Mayak 3.1 / Measurements west of Mayak Not having sufficient means to carry out a real cartography of the soil contamination around Mayak, the efforts were carried out within the framework of this preliminary work, on the west of the nuclear site and this for several reasons: The ruthenium-106 measurements published by Rosguidromet (air contamination and / or fallout) provided data on stations located from north-east (Metlino) to the south (Novogornyy, Argayash), so it was a priority to carry out controls on other parts of the territory around Mayak. Contamination with ruthenium 106 (regardless of the exact source), moved westward as it reached Europe. In the hypothesis that Mayak is at the origin of the discharge, it was therefore logical to control in priority the sector located in the west. It should be noted, however, that the simulations performed by CRIIRAD show that, in the event that the accidental releases occurred in Mayak, depending on the dates and times, the contaminated plumes could have moved first in other directions, especially in a northeasterly direction, before turning southwest. Most of the population near the Mayak site lives in the west, in the Forbidden City of Oziorsk, and in Kyshtym, so it was a priority to check the fallout levels in these areas. Furthermore, with regard to the contamination in 1957 (so-called "Kyshtym" accident) and 1967 (highly radioactive dust dispersed by winds from the shores of Lake Karatchaï), the official documents indicate that the most important fallout is intervened in the northeast. Numerous studies attest to the severity of residual contamination in these areas (see, for example, measurements taken in 2008 by CRIIRAD in Golubinka12, about 30 km northeast of Mayak). On the other hand, there are few independent measurements in the west. 3.2 / A very preliminary work The objective of CRIIRAD was to work in successive stages. If these tests revealed a high level of ruthenium106 contamination, this would provide evidence of Mayak's liability. If not, additional sampling should be done in additional angular areas. This soil analysis campaign is therefore only a first step, especially since, in the hypothesis of time-limited discharges, the trajectory of contaminated plumes at the local level is likely to be limited to a very small angular sector. The most intense fallout on the ground, which depends in addition to any precipitation (rain or snow) may therefore affect a restricted band. The realization of some samples of soil is not enough to cover 360 ° around the site. It would be necessary to cover all the angular sectors and at different distances from the supposed source term. 3.3 / Difficulties encountered It is necessary to insist here on the difficulties met to realize these preliminary surveys: Impossibility of approaching within 14 kilometers of Mayak due to access restrictions imposed by the Russian authorities (no-go zone).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Discoverers of the Ruthenium Isotopes
    •Platinum Metals Rev., 2011, 55, (4), 251–262• The Discoverers of the Ruthenium Isotopes Updated information on the discoveries of the six platinum group metals to 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1595/147106711X592448 http://www.platinummetalsreview.com/ By John W. Arblaster This review looks at the discovery and the discoverers Wombourne, West Midlands, UK of the thirty-eight known ruthenium isotopes with mass numbers from 87 to 124 found between 1931 and 2010. Email: [email protected] This is the sixth and fi nal review on the circumstances surrounding the discoveries of the isotopes of the six platinum group elements. The fi rst review on platinum isotopes was published in this Journal in October 2000 (1), the second on iridium isotopes in October 2003 (2), the third on osmium isotopes in October 2004 (3), the fourth on palladium isotopes in April 2006 (4) and the fi fth on rhodium isotopes in April 2011 (5). An update on the new isotopes of palladium, osmium, iridium and platinum discovered since the previous reviews in this series is also included. Naturally Occurring Ruthenium Of the thirty-eight known isotopes of ruthenium, seven occur naturally with the authorised isotopic abun- dances (6) shown in Table I. The isotopes were fi rst detected in 1931 by Aston (7, 8) using a mass spectrograph at the Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, UK. Because of diffi cult experimental conditions due to the use of poor quality samples, Aston actually only detected six of the isotopes and obtained very approximate Table I The Naturally Occurring Isotopes of Ruthenium Mass number Isotopic Abundance, % 96Ru 5.54 98Ru 1.87 99Ru 12.76 100Ru 12.60 101Ru 17.06 102Ru 31.55 104Ru 18.62 251 © 2011 Johnson Matthey http://dx.doi.org/10.1595/147106711X592448 •Platinum Metals Rev., 2011, 55, (4)• percentage abundances.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties and Applications of Ruthenium
    Chapter 17 Properties and Applications of Ruthenium Anil K. Sahu, Deepak K. Dash, Koushlesh Mishra, Saraswati P. Mishra, Rajni Yadav and Pankaj Kashyap Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76393 Abstract Ruthenium (Ru) with atomic number of 44 is one of the platinum group metals, the others being Rh, Pd, Os, Ir and Pt. In earth’s crust, it is quite rare, found in parts per billion quantities, in ores containing some of the other platinum group metals. Ruthenium is silvery whitish, lustrous hard metal with a shiny surface. It has seven stable isotopes. Recently, coordination and organometallic chemistry of Ru has shown remarkable growth. In this chapter, we review the application of Ru in diverse fields along with its physical and chemical properties. In the applications part of Ru we have primarily focused on the biomedical applications. The biomedical applications are broadly divided into diagnostic and treatment aspects. Ru and their complexes are mainly used in determination of ferritin, calcitonin and cyclosporine and folate level in human body for diagnosis of diseases. Treat- ment aspects focuses on immunosuppressant, antimicrobial and anticancer activity. Keywords: ruthenium, platinum group, biomedical application, rare element, cancer, isotopes 1. Discovery of ruthenium Ruthenium is one of the 118 chemical elements given in the periodic table. Out of these 118 elements, 92 elements originated from natural sources and remaining 26 elements have been synthesized in laboratories [1, 2]. The last naturally occurring element to be discovered was Uranium in 1789 [1, 3]. Technetium was the first man-made element to be synthesized in the year 1937 [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Activation Cross Sections of Proton Induced Nuclear Reactions on Palladium up to 80 Mev
    Activation cross sections of proton induced nuclear reactions on palladium up to 80 MeV F. Tark´ anyi´ a, F. Ditroi´ a,∗, S. Takacs´ a, J. Csikaia, A. Hermanneb, S. Uddind, M. Babad aInstitute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (ATOMKI), Debrecen, Hungary bCyclotron Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium cInstitute of Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE), Obninsk, Russia dCyclotron Radioisotope Center (CYRIC), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Abstract Activation cross sections of proton induced nuclear reactions on palladium were measured up to 80 MeV by using the stacked foil irradiation technique and gamma ray spectrometry. The beam intensity, the incident energy and the energy degradation were controlled by a method based on flux constancy via normalization to the excitation functions of monitor reactions measured in parallel. Excitation functions for direct and cumulative cross-sections were measured for the production of 104m;104g;105g;106m;110mAg, 100;101Pd, 99m;99g;100;101m;101g;102m;102g;105Rh and 103;97Ru radioisotopes. The cross section data were compared with the theoretical predictions of TENDL-2014 and -2015 libraries. For practical applications thick target yields were derived from the measured excitation functions. Application in the field of medical radionuclide production is shortly discussed. Keywords: proton irradiation, palladium target, stacked foil technique, cross sections, production yields 1. Introduction Hu et al., 1998; Johnson et al., 1979; Kormali et al., 1976; Zarubin and Sergeev, 1989). Our results obtained Excitation functions of proton induced nuclear re- in that period for some medically relevant radionuclides actions on palladium are important in many applica- were published during 2004-2007.
    [Show full text]
  • RUTHENIUM Element Symbol: Ru Atomic Number: 44
    RUTHENIUM Element Symbol: Ru Atomic Number: 44 An initiative of IYC 2011 brought to you by the RACI NICKI BURNS www.raci.org.au RUTHENIUM Element symbol: Ru Atomic number: 44 The element ruthenium is named after Ruthenia. This word is a Latin rendering of the historical territory of Rus, which today is formed with parts of Belarus, Ukraine, western Russia,northeastern Slovakia and eastern Poland. Ruthenium was discovered in 1844 by Karl Karlovitch Klaus, then an unknown professor at the University of Kazan. Klaus could be considered the creator of the chemistry of the platinum metals because of his extensive investigation of rhodium, iridium, osmium, and to a lesser extent, palladium and platinum. Ruthenium is the 74th most abundant metal on Earth and is generally found in ores with the other platinum group metals in the Ural Mountains and in North and South America. Roughly 12 tonnes of ruthenium is mined each year. Ruthenium is also a fission product of235 Uranium, however the extraction from used nuclear fuel is complicated, expensive and also results in radioactive isotopes of ruthenium. Ruthenium has several applications. An alloy containing small amounts of ruthenium with gold increases the stability of gold in jewellery. It is also used in some advanced high-temperature single-crystal superalloys with applications including the turbine blades in jet engines. The “RU” nib in the famous Parker 51 fountain pen was a 14K gold nib tipped with 96.2% ruthenium and 3.8% iridium. 106Ruthenium, a β-decaying isotope, is used in radiotherapy of eye tumours, mainly malignant melanomas of the uvea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Preparation and Characterization of Some Alkanethiolatoosmium Compounds Harold Harris Schobert Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1970 The preparation and characterization of some alkanethiolatoosmium compounds Harold Harris Schobert Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Inorganic Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Schobert, Harold Harris, "The preparation and characterization of some alkanethiolatoosmium compounds " (1970). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4357. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4357 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 71-14,258 SCHOBERT, Harold Harris, 1943- THE PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SOME ALKANETHIOLATOOSMIUM COMPOUNDS. Iowa State University, Ph.D., 1970 Chemistry, inorganic University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEH MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED THE PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SOME ALKANETHIOLATOOSMIUM COMPOUNDS by Harold Harris Schobert A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Inorganic Chemistry Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for
    [Show full text]
  • INGESTION PATHWAY the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) for the Ingestion Pathway Extends to a Radius of 50 Miles Through 360 Degrees from a Nuclear Power Plant
    WV REP Plan Issue 9, Revision 0 (11-Jan.-19) Annex 15a. – Accident Assessment (Post-Plume Phase) INGESTION PATHWAY The Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) for the ingestion pathway extends to a radius of 50 miles through 360 degrees from a nuclear power plant. Major potential pathways for ingestion include fresh fluid milk and other food commodities (especially those consumed fresh, such as leafy vegetables and fruit), and public water supply systems using surface water. This section summarizes the protective action guidance and appropriate protective actions for each major ingestion pathway. Criteria are established for initiation of ingestion protective actions. Dose commitment resulting from the ingestion pathway is separate and distinct from doses received in other incident phases. MILK AND FOOD MILK AND FOOD PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDES (PAGs) The PAGs used for milk and food were developed by HHS/FDA, and published as Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Human Food and Animal Feeds: Recommendations for State and Local Agencies by FDA on August 13, 1998 (FDA 1998). These values are intended to include both the milk and food components of the diet and represent the dose commitment from ingestion over the entire episode. Calculation of projected dose commitment from the ingestion pathway is described in Attachment 1, “Ingestion Pathway Dose Projections Procedure”. FDA guidance is described below. Ingestion Protective Action Guides (PAGs) A Protective Action Guide (PAG) is the committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE) or committed dose equivalent (CDE) to an individual tissue or organ that warrants protective action following a release of radionuclides. Annex 15a – Accident Assessment (Post-Plume Phase) 15a-1 WV REP Plan Issue 9, Revision 0 (11-Jan-19) The Ingestion Pathway PAGs are: 0.5 rem (5 mSv) committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE), -or- 5.0 rem (50 mSv) committed dose equivalent (CDE) to an individual tissue or organ, whichever is most limiting.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Baryon Instability Search with Long-Lived Isotopes
    Submitted to the Proceedings of International Workshop on Future Prospects of Baryon Instability Search in p-decay and n -» n oscillation experiments, Oak Ridge, TN, March 28-30,1996 PROSPECTS FOR BARYON INSTABILITY SEARCH WITH LONG-LIVED ISOTOPES Yu. Efremenkoab, W. Buggb, H. Cohnb, Yu. Kamyshkov*11, G. Parker4, F. Plasila * Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 b University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 h-f -£j ABSTRACT BEC 1 $ In this paper we consider the possibility of observation of baryon instability r \ o -v> • processes occurring inside nuclei by searching for the remnants of such processes that *-' Ox"§- .J could have been accumulated in nature as rare long-lived isotopes. As an example, we discuss here the possible detection of traces of 97Tc, 98Tc, and "Tc in deep-mined non- radioactive tin ores. Introduction The possible experimental observation of baryon instability remains among the most fundamental problems of modern physics [1]. The observed "baryon asymmetry" of the Universe [2] and some Unification Theories including Supersymmetric Models [3,4,5] require either nucleon-decay (with baryon number change by AB=1) or neutron- antineutron transitions (with baryon number change by AB=2) with rates stretching the limits of present experimental capabilities. Future prospects for proton decay and neutron- antineutron transition searches by traditional detection techniques have been reviewed in a number of contributions to this Workshop [1,6,7,8,9]. These techniques are based, in general, on the direct detection in real time of the final products of baryon transformation leading to the disappearance of one or two nucleons inside the nuclei corresponding to A B=l and AB=2, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Technical Volume 4
    The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Fukushima The The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Technical Volume 4/5 Technical Volume 4/5 Radiological Consequences Radiological Consequences Radiological PO Box 100, Vienna International Centre 1400 Vienna, Austria Printed in Austria ISBN 978–92–0–107015–9 (set) 1 THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT TECHNICAL VOLUME 4 RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GERMANY OMAN ALBANIA GHANA PAKISTAN ALGERIA GREECE PALAU ANGOLA GUATEMALA PANAMA ARGENTINA GUYANA PAPUA NEW GUINEA ARMENIA HAITI PARAGUAY AUSTRALIA HOLY SEE PERU AUSTRIA HONDURAS PHILIPPINES AZERBAIJAN HUNGARY POLAND BAHAMAS ICELAND PORTUGAL BAHRAIN INDIA QATAR BANGLADESH INDONESIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BELARUS IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF ROMANIA BELGIUM IRAQ RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELIZE IRELAND RWANDA BENIN ISRAEL SAN MARINO BOLIVIA, PLURINATIONAL ITALY SAUDI ARABIA STATE OF JAMAICA SENEGAL BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAPAN SERBIA BOTSWANA JORDAN SEYCHELLES BRAZIL KAZAKHSTAN SIERRA LEONE BRUNEI DARUSSALAM KENYA SINGAPORE BULGARIA KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SLOVAKIA BURKINA FASO KUWAIT SLOVENIA BURUNDI KYRGYZSTAN SOUTH AFRICA CAMBODIA LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC SPAIN CAMEROON REPUBLIC SRI LANKA CANADA LATVIA SUDAN CENTRAL AFRICAN LEBANON SWAZILAND REPUBLIC LESOTHO SWEDEN CHAD LIBERIA SWITZERLAND CHILE LIBYA SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC CHINA LIECHTENSTEIN TAJIKISTAN COLOMBIA LITHUANIA CONGO LUXEMBOURG THAILAND COSTA RICA MADAGASCAR THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CÔTE D’IVOIRE MALAWI REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CROATIA MALAYSIA TOGO
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Production of Light and Heavy $ R $-Process Elements Via Fission
    Draft version June 22, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Co-production of Light and Heavy r-process Elements via Fission Deposition Nicole Vassh,1 Matthew R. Mumpower,2, 3 Gail C. McLaughlin,4 Trevor M. Sprouse,5 and Rebecca Surman5, 3 1University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA 2Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 3Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the Elements, USA 4North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 5University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA ABSTRACT We apply for the first time fission yields determined across the chart of nuclides from the macroscopic- microscopic theory of the Finite Range Liquid Drop Model to simulations of rapid neutron capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis. With the fission rates and yields derived within the same theoretical framework utilized for other relevant nuclear data, our results represent an important step toward self- consistent applications of macroscopic-microscopic models in r-process calculations. The yields from this model are wide for nuclei with extreme neutron excess. We show that these wide distributions of neutron-rich nuclei, and particularly the asymmetric yields for key species that fission at late times in the r process, can contribute significantly to the abundances of the lighter heavy elements, specifically the light precious metals palladium and silver. Since these asymmetric yields correspondingly also deposit into the lanthanide region, we consider the possible evidence for co-production by comparing our nucleosynthesis results directly with the trends in the elemental ratios of metal-poor stars rich in r-process material.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction Behaviors of of Cumulative Fission Fissiogenic
    Geochemical Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 227 to 239, 1992 Reconstruction of cumulative fission yield curve and geochemical behaviors of fissiogenic nuclides in the Oklo natural reactors HIROSHI HIDAKA*, TAKASHI KONISHI and AKIMASA MASUDA Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113, Japan (Received November 25, 1991; Accepted July 20, 1992) Isotopic ratios and elemental abundances of rare earth elements (REE), Rb, Sr, Zr, Mo, Ru, Pd, Ag, Te, Ba and U in four samples from two Oklo Reactor Zones 7, 8, 9 and 10 were determined by ther mal ionization mass spectrometry. These elements have unusual but reasonable isotopic anomalies due to the effect of fission and/or neutron capture reactions. In order to discuss the retentivity of fissiogenic nuclides, the fission product yield curves covering the wide mass range from 90 to 160 were reconstructed on the basis of our results. We have estimated the behavior of fissiogenic nuclides by means of the differences between the measured curves and empirical ones. From comparison of these two sets of curves, measured and empirical, the behaviors of fissiogenic nuclides were deduced. Our results are in agreement with previous Oklo work at the following points: (I) Ru, Pd, Te and most of a series of REE (except for La and/or Ce) have been well retained in the samples, (II) Rb, Sr and Ba have been lost to a great extent, and their isotopic ratios are nearly the same as those of terrestrial standard values, and (III) Zr, Mo and Ag have been partially removed from the reactors. The behaviors of Zr and Mo seem to have been highly affected by the chemical and geological environments in and around the reac tors.
    [Show full text]
  • Nov. 12, 1974 3,848,048
    Nov. 12, 1974 R. H. MOORE 3,848,048 RECOVERY OF FISSION-PRODUCED TECHNETIUM, PALLADIUM, RHODIUM AND RUTHENIUM Filed July 12. 1973 cr, in "O EZ CLE 3 a. J I £T "O LLS GL O -J < Q United States Patent Office P„lented 2 3,848,048 Technetium and the platinum group metals, ruthenium, RECOVERY OF FISSION-PRODUCED TECH- rhodium and palladium, are produced in fairly high yield NETIUM, PALLADIUM, RHODIUM AND in nuclear reactors. Technetium is nonexistent in nature RUTHENIUM and may have properties of value which warrant its re- Raymond H. Moore, Richland, Wash., assignor to the 5 covery. The platinum metals are of high intrinsic value United States of America as represented by the United and should be recovered to supplement waning natural States Atomic Energy Commission resources. Filed July 12,1973, Ser. No. 378,471 The projected annual availability of technetinm and the Int. CI. COlg 55/00, 57/00 platinum group metals is given in Table I below: i U.S. CI. 423—22 5 Claims 10 TABLE I Annual Availability of Fission Product Pd, Eh, Ru and Te In (10') ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Troy oz./yr." The fission-produced technetium and the platinum Pd Eh Eu To metals, palladium, rhodium and ruthenium, are recovered ic 1970 0.77 0.51 2.3 0.93 from an aqueous acidic fuel reprocessing waste solution 1975 _ 22-23 1S-14 61-67 25-27 1980- ... 55-75 30^12 145-201 57-70 and separated from each other by contacting the waste 1985. 115-170 6<t-95 302-450 119-178 solution sequentially with a series of beds of carbon, each 1990 214-328 110-176 524-801 201-311 bed having adsorbed thereon a different chelating agent a The ranges given reflect the differences obtained from the difieren specific for the metals to be recovered, whereby the metal types of reactors.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Processing Times for Accelerator Produced
    molecules Article Defining Processing Times for Accelerator Produced 225Ac and Other Isotopes from Proton Irradiated Thorium Jonathan Fitzsimmons 1,* , Justin Griswold 2 , Dmitri Medvedev 1, Cathy S. Cutler 1 and Leonard Mausner 1 1 Isotope Production Laboratory, Collider-Accelerator Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA; [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (C.S.C.); [email protected] (L.M.) 2 Isotope and Fuel Cycle Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: jfi[email protected]; Tel.: +1-631-344-4453 Received: 20 February 2019; Accepted: 18 March 2019; Published: 20 March 2019 Abstract: During the purification of radioisotopes, decay periods or time dependent purification steps may be required to achieve a certain level of radiopurity in the final product. Actinum-225 (Ac-225), Silver-111 (Ag-111), Astatine-211 (At-211), Ruthenium-105 (Ru-105), and Rhodium-105 (Rh-105) are produced in a high energy proton irradiated thorium target. Experimentally measured cross sections, along with MCNP6-generated cross sections, were used to determine the quantities of Ac-225, Ag-111, At-211, Ru-105, Rh-105, and other co-produced radioactive impurities produced in a proton irradiated thorium target at Brookhaven Linac Isotope Producer (BLIP). Ac-225 and Ag-111 can be produced with high radiopurity by the proton irradiation of a thorium target at BLIP. Keywords: Isotope production; Actinium-225; Silver-111; MCNPX; Thorium; proton irradiation; fission products; Sr-82; critical process parameter 1. Introduction Typically, it is best to commence isotope purification as soon as possible after the End of Bombardment (EOB), to minimize losses due to decay.
    [Show full text]