DOCSLIB.ORG

Notting Hill Housing Trust

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notting Hill Housing Trust NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST (incorporated in England with limited liability under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 with registration number 16558R and registered with the Regulator under the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, as amended by the Localism Act 2011, with number L0035) £250,000,000 4.375 per cent. Secured Bonds due 2054 Issue price: 98.201 per cent. The £250,000,000 4.375 per cent. Secured Bonds due 2054 (the Bonds) are issued by Notting Hill Housing Trust (the Issuer). Application has been made to the Financial Conduct Authority in its capacity as competent authority (the UK Listing Authority) for the Bonds to be admitted to the Official List of the UK Listing Authority and to the London Stock Exchange plc (the London Stock Exchange) for the Bonds to be admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange's regulated market. The London Stock Exchange's regulated market is a regulated market for the purposes of Directive 2004/39/EC (the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive). Interest on the Bonds is payable semi-annually in arrear on 20th February and 20th August in each year at the rate of 4.375 per cent. per annum, commencing on 20th August, 2014, as described in Condition 7 (Interest). The Issuer may, at its option, redeem all (or some only) of the Bonds at any time at the higher of their principal amount and an amount calculated by reference to the sum of (i) the yield on the relevant outstanding United Kingdom government benchmark conventional gilt having the nearest maturity date to that of the Bonds and (ii) 0.20 per cent., together with accrued interest. The Issuer may also, at its option, redeem all, but not some only, of the Bonds at any time at their principal amount plus accrued interest, in the event of certain tax changes as described in Condition 9.2 (Redemption for Taxation Reasons) and shall redeem all, but not some only, of the Bonds at their principal amount plus accrued interest, within 180 days in the event that the Issuer ceases to be a Registered Provider of Social Housing (as defined below) subject to and as described in Condition 9.4 (Mandatory Early Redemption). Unless previously redeemed the Bonds will be redeemed in full on 20th February, 2054 (the Maturity Date). The Notting Hill Housing Group (as defined below) has been assigned a credit rating of "A2" from Moody's Investors Service Limited (Moody's) and it is expected that the Bonds will be rated "A2" by Moody's. A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Moody's is established in the European Union and is registered under Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 (as amended). As such Moody's is included in the list of credit rating agencies published by the European Securities and Markets Authority on its website in accordance with such Regulation. The Bonds will be issued in denominations of £100,000 and integral multiples of £1,000 in excess thereof. The Bonds will initially be represented by a temporary global bond (the Temporary Global Bond), without interest coupons, which will be deposited on or about 20th February, 2014 (the Closing Date) with a common safekeeper for Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (Euroclear) and Clearstream Banking, société anonyme (Clearstream, Luxembourg). Interests in the Temporary Global Bond will be exchangeable for interests in a permanent global bond (the Permanent Global Bond and, together with the Temporary Global Bond, the Global Bonds), without interest coupons, on or after 1st April, 2014 (the Exchange Date), upon certification as to non- U.S. beneficial ownership. Interests in the Permanent Global Bond will be exchangeable for definitive Bonds only in certain limited circumstances – see "Form of the Bonds and Summary of Provisions relating to the Bonds while in Global Form". An investment in the Bonds involves certain risks. Prospective investors should have regard to the factors described under the heading "Risk Factors" on page 12. Joint Bookrunners Barclays Lloyds Bank Santander Global Banking & Markets The date of this Offering Circular is 18th February, 2014 This Offering Circular comprises a prospectus for the purposes of section 85(2) of the FSMA. The Issuer accepts responsibility for the information contained in this Offering Circular. To the best of the knowledge of the Issuer (having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case) the information contained in this Offering Circular is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information. The figures referred to in the Valuation Report (as defined below) prepared by Jones Lang LaSalle Limited in the section entitled "Market Commentary" were obtained from the Land Registry and LSL Property Services plc and the figures in the Valuation Report prepared by Mazars Property Consultancy Limited in the section entitled "Valuation Assumptions" were obtained from the Nationwide House Price Index and the Homelet Rental Index. The Issuer confirms that such figures have been accurately reproduced and that, as far as the Issuer is aware and is able to ascertain from information published by the Land Registry, LSL Property Services plc, the Nationwide House Price Index and the Homelet Rental Index no facts have been omitted which would render the reproduced figures inaccurate or misleading. Each of Jones Lang LaSalle Limited and Mazars Property Consultancy Limited (the Valuers) accepts responsibility for the information contained in the section "Valuation Reports" relating to the Valuation Report prepared by it and, to the best of its knowledge (having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), such information is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information. Save for the Issuer and (in respect of the Valuation Reports) the Valuers, no other party has independently verified any information contained herein. Accordingly, no representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made and no responsibility or liability is accepted by Banco Santander, S.A., Barclays Bank PLC or Lloyds Bank plc (together, the Joint Bookrunners) or the Trustee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this Offering Circular or any other information provided by the Issuer in connection with the offering of the Bonds. Neither the Joint Bookrunners nor the Trustee accepts any liability in relation to the information contained in this Offering Circular or any other information provided by the Issuer in connection with the offering of the Bonds or their distribution. No person is or has been authorised by the Issuer or the Trustee to give any information or to make any representation not contained in or not consistent with this Offering Circular or any other information supplied in connection with the offering of the Bonds and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorised by the Issuer, the Joint Bookrunners or the Trustee. To the fullest extent permitted by law neither the Joint Bookrunners nor the Trustee accepts any responsibility for the contents of this Offering Circular or for any other statement made or purported to be made by it or on its behalf in connection with the Issuer or the issue and offering of the Bonds. Each of the Joint Bookrunners and the Trustee accordingly disclaims all and any liability whether arising in tort or contract or otherwise which it might otherwise have in respect of this Offering Circular or any such statement. Neither this Offering Circular nor any other information supplied in connection with the Bonds (a) is intended to provide the basis of any credit or other evaluation or (b) should be considered as a recommendation by the Issuer, the Joint Bookrunners or the Trustee that any recipient of this Offering Circular or any other information supplied in connection with the Bonds should purchase any Bonds. Each investor contemplating purchasing any Bonds should make its own independent investigation of the financial condition and affairs, and its own appraisal of the creditworthiness, of the Issuer. Neither this Offering Circular nor any other information supplied in connection with the 2 offering of the Bonds constitutes an offer or invitation by or on behalf of the Issuer, the Joint Bookrunners or the Trustee to any person to subscribe for or to purchase any Bonds. Neither the delivery of this Offering Circular nor the offering, sale or delivery of the Bonds shall in any circumstances imply that the information contained herein concerning the Issuer is correct at any time subsequent to the date hereof or that any other information supplied in connection with the offering of the Bonds is correct as of any time subsequent to the date indicated in the document containing the same. The Joint Bookrunners and the Trustee expressly do not undertake to review the financial condition or affairs of the Issuer during the life of the Bonds or to advise any investor in the Bonds of any information coming to their attention. The Bonds have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the Securities Act) and are subject to U.S. tax law requirements. Subject to certain exceptions, the Bonds may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons. For a further description of certain restrictions on the offering and sale of the Bonds and on distribution of this Offering Circular, see "Subscription and Sale" below.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Residential Update
    Residential update UK Residential Research | January 2018 South East London has benefitted from a significant facelift in recent years. A number of regeneration projects, including the redevelopment of ex-council estates, has not only transformed the local area, but has attracted in other developers. More affordable pricing compared with many other locations in London has also played its part. The prospects for South East London are bright, with plenty of residential developments raising the bar even further whilst also providing a more diverse choice for residents. Regeneration catalyst Pricing attraction Facelift boosts outlook South East London is a hive of residential Pricing has been critical in the residential The outlook for South East London is development activity. Almost 5,000 revolution in South East London. also bright. new private residential units are under Indeed pricing is so competitive relative While several of the major regeneration construction. There are also over 29,000 to many other parts of the capital, projects are completed or nearly private units in the planning pipeline or especially compared with north of the river, completed there are still others to come. unbuilt in existing developments, making it has meant that the residential product For example, Convoys Wharf has the it one of London’s most active residential developed has appealed to both residents potential to deliver around 3,500 homes development regions. within the area as well as people from and British Land plan to develop a similar Large regeneration projects are playing further afield. number at Canada Water. a key role in the delivery of much needed The competitively-priced Lewisham is But given the facelift that has already housing but are also vital in the uprating a prime example of where people have taken place and the enhanced perception and gentrification of many parts of moved within South East London to a more of South East London as a desirable and South East London.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 09 19 South Lambeth Estate
    LB LAMBETH EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 2018 SOUTH LAMBETH ESTATE REGENERATION PROGRAMME www.ottawaystrategic.co.uk $es1hhqdb.docx 1 5-Dec-1810-Aug-18 Equality Impact Assessment Date August 2018 Sign-off path for EIA Head of Equalities (email [email protected]) Director (this must be a director not responsible for the service/policy subject to EIA) Strategic Director or Chief Exec Directorate Management Team (Children, Health and Adults, Corporate Resources, Neighbourhoods and Growth) Procurement Board Corporate EIA Panel Cabinet Title of Project, business area, Lambeth Housing Regeneration policy/strategy Programme Author Ottaway Strategic Management Ltd Job title, directorate Contact email and telephone Strategic Director Sponsor Publishing results EIA publishing date EIA review date Assessment sign off (name/job title): $es1hhqdb.docx 2 5-Dec-1810-Aug-18 LB Lambeth Equality Impact Assessment South Lambeth Estate Regeneration Programme Independently Reported by Ottaway Strategic Management ltd August 2018 Contents EIA Main Report 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 4 2 Introduction and context ....................................................................................... 12 3 Summary of equalities evidence held by LB Lambeth ................................................ 17 4 Primary Research: Summary of Household EIA Survey Findings 2017 ........................ 22 5 Equality Impact Assessment ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Have 'Mixed Communities' Policies and Some Difficulties In
    Notes for Haringey Housing and Regeneration Scrutiny Panel Dr Jane Lewis London Metropolitan University April 3rd 2017 Dr Jane Lewis • Dr Jane Lewis is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology and Social Policy at London Metropolitan University. She has worked previously as a lecturer in urban regeneration and in geography as well as in urban regeneration and economic development posts in local government in London. Jane has wide experience teaching at under-graduate and post-graduate levels with specific expertise in urban inequalities; globalisation and global inequalities; housing and urban regeneration policy and is course leader of the professional doctorate programme in working lives and of masters’ courses in urban regeneration and sustainable cities dating back to 2005.Jane has a research background in cities and in urban inequalities, urban regeneration policy and economic and labour market conditions and change. aims • 1. Invited following presentation Haringey Housing Forum on concerns relating to council estate regeneration schemes in London in name of mixed communities polices • 2. Senior Lecturer Social Policy at LMU (attached note) • 3. Terms of reference of Scrutiny Panel focus on 1and 2 – relating to rehousing of council tenants in HDV redevelopments and to 7 – equalities implications Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV) and Northumberland Park • ‘development projects’ proposed for the first phase of the HDV include Northumberland Park Regeneration Area – includes 4 estates, Northumberland Park estate largest • Northumberland Park
    [Show full text]
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Council Housing For?
    ‘We thought it was Buckingham Palace’ ‘Homes for Heroes’ Cottage Estates Dover House Estate, Putney, LCC (1919) Cottage Estates Alfred and Ada Salter Wilson Grove Estate, Bermondsey Metropolitan Borough Council (1924) Tenements White City Estate, LCC (1938) Mixed Development Somerford Grove, Hackney Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Neighbourhood Units The Lansbury Estate, Poplar, LCC (1951) Post-War Flats Spa Green Estate, Finsbury Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Berthold Lubetkin Post-War Flats Churchill Gardens Estate, City of Westminster (1951) Architectural Wars Alton East, Roehampton, LCC (1951) Alton West, Roehampton, LCC (1953) Multi-Storey Housing Dawson’s Heights, Southwark Borough Council (1972) Kate Macintosh The Small Estate Chinbrook Estate, Lewisham, LCC (1965) Low-Rise, High Density Lambeth Borough Council Central Hill (1974) Cressingham Gardens (1978) Camden Borough Council Low-Rise, High Density Branch Hill Estate (1978) Alexandra Road Estate (1979) Whittington Estate (1981) Goldsmith Street, Norwich City Council (2018) Passivhaus Mixed Communities ‘The key to successful communities is a good mix of people: tenants, leaseholders and freeholders. The Pepys Estate was a monolithic concentration of public housing and it makes sense to break that up a bit and bring in a different mix of incomes and people with spending power.’ Pat Hayes, LB Lewisham, Director of Regeneration You have castrated communities. You have colonies of low income people, living in houses provided by the local authorities, and you have the higher income groups living in their own colonies. This segregation of the different income groups is a wholly evil thing, from a civilised point of view… We should try to introduce what was always the lovely feature of English and Welsh villages, where the doctor, the grocer, the butcher and the farm labourer all lived in the same street – the living tapestry of a mixed community.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London `Sink Estate'
    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2020, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 20–33 DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i1.2395 Article Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’ Paul Watt Department of Geography, Birkbeck, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 4 August 2019 | Accepted: 9 December 2019 | Published: 27 February 2020 Abstract This article offers a critical assessment of Loic Wacquant’s influential advanced marginality framework with reference to research undertaken on a London public/social housing estate. Following Wacquant, it has become the orthodoxy that one of the major vectors of advanced marginality is territorial stigmatisation and that this particularly affects social housing es- tates, for example via mass media deployment of the ‘sink estate’ label in the UK. This article is based upon a multi-method case study of the Aylesbury estate in south London—an archetypal stigmatised ‘sink estate.’ The article brings together three aspects of residents’ experiences of the Aylesbury estate: territorial stigmatisation and dissolution of place, both of which Wacquant focuses on, and housing conditions which he neglects. The article acknowledges the deprivation and various social problems the Aylesbury residents have faced. It argues, however, that rather than internalising the extensive and intensive media-fuelled territorial stigmatisation of their ‘notorious’ estate, as Wacquant’s analysis implies, residents have largely disregarded, rejected, or actively resisted the notion that they are living in an ‘estate from hell,’ while their sense of place belonging has not dissolved. By contrast, poor housing—in the form of heating breakdowns, leaks, infes- tation, inadequate repairs and maintenance—caused major distress and frustration and was a more important facet of their everyday lives than territorial stigmatisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (591Kb)
    This is the author’s version of the article, first published in Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, Volume 8 / Number 2 / Winter, 2014-15, pp. 133- 144 (12). https://www.henrystewartpublications.com/jurr Understanding and measuring social sustainability Email [email protected] Abstract Social sustainability is a new strand of discourse on sustainable development. It has developed over a number of years in response to the dominance of environmental concerns and technological solutions in urban development and the lack of progress in tackling social issues in cities such as inequality, displacement, liveability and the increasing need for affordable housing. Even though the Sustainable Communities policy agenda was introduced in the UK a decade ago, the social dimensions of sustainability have been largely overlooked in debates, policy and practice around sustainable urbanism. However, this is beginning to change. A combination of financial austerity, public sector budget cuts, rising housing need, and public & political concern about the social outcomes of regeneration, are focusing attention on the relationship between urban development, quality of life and opportunities. There is a growing interest in understanding and measuring the social outcomes of regeneration and urban development in the UK and internationally. A small, but growing, movement of architects, planners, developers, housing associations and local authorities advocating a more ‘social’ approach to planning, constructing and managing cities. This is part of an international interest in social sustainability, a concept that is increasingly being used by governments, public agencies, policy makers, NGOs and corporations to frame decisions about urban development, regeneration and housing, as part of a burgeoning policy discourse on the sustainability and resilience of cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Estate Regeneration
    ESTATE REGENERATION sourcebook Estate Regeneration Sourcebook Content: Gavin McLaughlin © February 2015 Urban Design London All rights reserved [email protected] www.urbandesignlondon.com Cover image: Colville Phase 2 Karakusevic Carson Architects 2 Preface As we all struggle to meet the scale and complexity of London’s housing challenges, it is heartening to see the huge number of successful estate regeneration projects that are underway in the capital. From Kidbrooke to Woodberry Down, Clapham Park to Graeme Park, South Acton to West Hendon, there are estates being transformed all across London. All are complicated, but most are moving ahead with pace, delivering more homes of all tenures and types, to a better quality, and are offering improved accommodation, amenities and environments for existing residents and newcomers alike. The key to success in projects as complex as estate regeneration lies in the quality of the partnerships and project teams that deliver them and, crucially, in the leadership offered by local boroughs. That’s why I welcome this new resource from UDL as a useful tool to help those involved with such projects to see what’s happening elsewhere and to use the networks that London offers to exchange best practice. Learning from the successes – and mistakes – of others is usually the key to getting things right. London is a fascinating laboratory of case studies and this new sourcebook is a welcome reference point for those already working on estate regeneration projects or those who may be considering doing so in the future. David Lunts Executive Director of Housing and Land at the GLA Introduction There is a really positive feeling around estate regeneration in London at the moment.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR Report Template
    BNP Paribas Real Estate & Astor Property Group 39 424.04033.00003 Glossop Road, Gamesley December 2014 DRAWING 2 RESULTS OF BAT SURVEY SLR BNP Paribas Real Estate & Astor Property Group 40 424.04033.00003 Glossop Road, Gamesley December 2014 APPENDIX A TARGET NOTES TO EXTENDED PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY (DRAWING 1) Target Note Description Area of largely native scrub, shrub and trees. Species include silver birch, guelder rose Viburnum opulus, goat willow Salix caprea, elder 1 Sambucus nigra, ash Fraxinus excelsior, cherry Prunus sp. and dogwood Cornus sanguinea. 2 Stand of Japanese knotweed measuring approximately 20m by 3m. Railway embankment, consisting of scrub and tall ruderal to the west, 3 graduating to oak and birch woodland to the east. Small stands of bracken also occur. SLR BNP Paribas Real Estate & Astor Property Group 41 424.04033.00003 Glossop Road, Gamesley December 2014 APPENDIX B PROTOCOL FOR WORKING IN AREAS THAT MIGHT SUPPORT BATS General Protocol for Demolition of Buildings If bats are found within a site being demolished / stripped, or if further advice is needed, it is recommended that contractors contact either ‘Bat Line’ (0845 1300228), or SLR Consulting (0114 290 3628 / 07971462696) immediately. In cases where specialist ecological surveys have indicated the possible presence of bats, but where bats themselves or signs of bats (such as droppings) have not been detected, it is essential that demolition is carried out in an appropriate and sensitive manner. It should be noted that where bat roosts are found and have potential to be affected by site development, a European Protected Species License (EPSL) from Natural England is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for Wales
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT THE MAIN GUILDHALL, HIGH STREET, KINGSTON UPON THAMES ON FRIDAY 28 OCTOBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/22 ______________________________ Time noted: 9.12 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the second day of the hearing here at Kingston. I am Howard Simmons, the Lead Assistant Commissioner responsible for chairing this session, and my colleague Tim Bowden is here from the Boundary Commission, who may want to say something about the administrative arrangements. MR BOWDEN: Thank you very much indeed, Howard, and good morning. We are scheduled to run until 5 pm today. Obviously, Howard can vary that at his discretion. We have quite a number of speakers. I think so far we have about 29 or 30 pre-booked and the first one is due to start in a couple of moments. Just a few housekeeping rules for the day. We are not expecting any fire alarms. If one does go off, it is out of this door and down the stairs and the meeting point is outside the front of the building; toilets out of the back door, please; ladies to the right, gents down the corridor to the left. Can you keep mobile phones on silent or switched off. If you want to take a call please go out of the back of the room.
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Evidence Virginia Blackman Avison Young
    Proof of Evidence Virginia Blackman Avison Young July 2019 THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET (WEST HENDON REGENERATION AREA) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER (No 3) 2018 REFERENCE: APP/PCU/CPOH/N5090/3218378 Proof of Evidence Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Scope of Evidence ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 3. The need for the inclusion of all the land & interests .............................................................................................. 2 4. The Requirements of Government Guidance ......................................................................................................... 3 5. Compensation principles and the framework for undertaking regulations ....................................................... 4 6. Undertaking negotiations ............................................................................................................................................ 8 7. Update on negotiations ............................................................................................................................................... 9 8. Open Space ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 9. Responses to objections............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]