Here for 29 Years, I Have Three We Think Children Here, I Know Everyone, and “ Feel Very Safe and Secure Living Here

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Here for 29 Years, I Have Three We Think Children Here, I Know Everyone, and “ Feel Very Safe and Secure Living Here Photography Feature Feature Sport Finally, fun photographs of The Thinking Space pilot Jim Ottewill gets the lowdown A new independent documentary uncovers the stories behind the Tottenham. Stewart Hardie that worked. Two locals on Tottenham Grime and the iconic landmark White Hart Lane due to be demolished next year. snaps the local area. want to share why. next generation of talent Memory Lane (2016) explores the legacy of the stadium. Page 5 & 6 Page 7 Page 10 Page 12 www.tottenhamcommunitypress.co.uk facebook.com/tottenhamcp T @tottenhamcp TOTTENHAM E [email protected] COMMUNITY PRESS November 2016 No. 1, Free Demolition talks in Northumberland Park Residents want a vote to decide on the future of their homes the campaigners. She says “I have lived here for 29 years, I have three We think children here, I know everyone, and “ feel very safe and secure living here. there should Now I feel very concerned about where I will live. I won’t get a new be a vote mortgage because of my age.” Her husband Sirajul adds, “With the before any money, we would have to go 100 miles from London to buy another sales or any place. But all of our family are here in Tottenham”. demolition, The plans would mean the dem- olition of most of the estate, but and a specific the council has not given residents any information, causing confu- sion for many people about their clear offer to future. There is very little appetite amongst residents for demolition, people about instead they feel the estate needs better management, investment in what’s going the housing, and support for the existing community. There would to happen ” be no guaranteed right to return for tenants, or for leaseholders, and the wider benefits for the com- to the estates after the new homes munity in Northumberland Park. are built. Council tenants would Haringey will retain control over be re-housed off the estate never the timing and quality of how any to return. 84-year-old retired cler- new housing is designed and built gyman Rev. Paul Nicolson lives loc- on council land. Once the Haringey Local residents Moriam Islam and Bob Lindsay-Smith at a recent meeting for Northumberland Park Decides ally and strongly supports the res- Development Vehicle is established idents campaign. He says, “We will in 2017 we will work closely with be taking the petition to Council- residents to deliver new homes, new By Paul Burnham & Adjoa Wiredu A recent council report states plans fore any sales or any demolitions, lors, MPs and Ministers, until they community facilities and new public to demolish and rebuild new homes and a specific clear offer to people listen to our concerns”. spaces in Northumberland Park.” esidents in North Totten- in Northumberland Park with a com- about what’s going to happen”, says A spokesperson for Haringey Coun- ham are questioning re- mitment to a minimum of 24% af- Paul Burnham from Haringey Def- cil said: “We have been working with Contact Northumberland Park R generation plans which fordable housing. Northumberland end Council Housing. local residents over the past two Decides for more information: could see the demolition of 1,800 Park Decides are concerned that the The recent ruling by the govern- and a half years to understand their homes over a ten to fifteen year Council may not build enough af- ment to block plans to force out views about the area, what they E [email protected] T 07847 714 158 period. The community group, Nor- fordable housing to rehouse all ten- residents at Aylesbury Estate is would like to see improved and thumberland Park Decides, an ini- ants. They want a proper yes/no encouraging for residents living in changed and how they want to work Next meeting: tiative of Haringey Defend Council vote to decide on any demolition Northumberland Park. They hope with us. These changes include po- Monday 21st November, 6:30pm Housing, is a group campaigning plans. They are signing petitions this could set a precedent to save tentially redeveloping parts of the Northumberland Park to defend council housing in Nor- and holding monthly meetings. “We their homes. Moriam Islam, a lease- local housing estates and deliver Neighbourhood Resource Centre thumberland Park from demolition. think there should be a vote be- holder in Alnwick House, is one of the new homes Tottenham needs 177 Park Lane, London N17 0HJ 2 No 1 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016 TOTTENHAM COMMUNITY PRESS MEET THE TEAM up to date on what is happening in Tottenham. It’s really important for STEADFAST IN people to know what is happening in their local community and for there DIFFICULTIES to be a resource like the Tottenham Community Press to give people that knowledge and raise awareness of local issues. We should invest our- NOV/DEC 2016 – No. 1 selves in the place that we live and Tottenham Community Press is an get to know our neighbours rather independent community newspaper. than them being strangers. I think We publish bi-monthly and distribute that there is such a rich, vibrant mix 10,000 free copies of each issue of backgrounds and so many inter- to libraries, cafes, pubs, and other esting stories to be heard so would places around Tottenham. love to be a part of sharing them with everyone. Publisher David Floyd Louise Davidson, Editor Social Media Volunteer Adjoa Wiredu Art Direction uring fours years of men- Jonathan Duncan tal health difficulties, I -ac Broadwater Farm defence campaign event, Tottenham High Road, 1988 cumulated a form of com- Project Manager Credit Bruce Castle Museum, Haringey Archive Museum Service D munity. Composed of people, outside Anna Merryfield of friends and family, I had met in o care about an issue and to ’m David and I’m the publisher Andrews University to study social NHS services, people I’d never met Contributors Jim Ottewill do something about it are of the paper as part of my job anthropology. After graduating I in person but communicated with Neri Gun T two very different things. I as Managing Director of Social moved to London and became tot- via social media, as well as a com- Paul Nicolson To be a campaigner is a heavy weight Spider CIC, a not-for-profit social ally enamoured with its diversity, bination of articles and literature Paul Burnham to bare but I believe someone has to enterprise based in Walthamstow. the excitement of the city and the that – although the authors were M.S. do it. They work hard, day in and Two years ago we got together with dynamism of its characters. These unaware – became a community for Tom Vine day out for little or mostly no money, a group of charities and social en- attributes of London are, in my me. Through this unknowing com- Wendy Charlton fighting for better homes, services terprises to launch Waltham Forest opinion, wonderfully demonstrat- munity, I met Mark Brown – the De- Alan Fisher and our basic human rights. At a Echo, a community newspaper for ed here in Tottenham, and I hope velopment Director of Social Spider Stewart Hardie time of change and immense pres- Waltham Forest. that Tottenham Community Press – initially through Twitter but later Shakira Dyer sure, they gather local troops and The Echo launched as a quarter- can go some way towards captur- in person at a moment when return- stand up for us at meetings, demon- ly publication. It is now published ing that. I also hope that our paper ing to any meaningful sense of work strations and even on social media. every month with an average of 15 can give a voice to all the people felt unobtainable, or unsustain- In some cases, local campaign- local people contributing to each throughout Tottenham doing in- able. With the support of Mark and ers walk around door knocking to issue, writing about the issues that credible work to strengthen their David (see left) and through a Time educate us, giving us the opportu- matter to them and telling the stor- community. I mainly manage the to Change funded project Making nity to petition and helping to make ies that the private sector media logistics of the paper, such as distri- Waltham Forest Mentally Health our voices count. The work they do often ignores. The paper is funded bution and advertising, essentially Friendly, I was able to re-engage barely gets a thank you or a pat on via advertising from local business- trying to make sure the paper gets and become a member of a tangible the back. It’s a tough road they walk, es, charities and public bodies and to as many people as possible! So community again. Whilst at Social at times lonely, albeit an import- distributed in community venues far, reaching out into the commu- Spider we spoke of – amongst many ant one. That’s why this first issue across the borough. nity and finding out what people other things – the time prior to my of Tottenham Community Press is We’re launching Tottenham Com- are doing has been hugely reward- mental health difficulties when I was dedicated to our local campaigners. munity Press because we want local ing and I hope we can continue to studying at the University of the Arts Wendy Charlton tells us how her people and community organisa- develop those relationships as we London (L.C.C.), which later led to art does the talking, the Northum- tions in Tottenham to have the same progress with the paper. my involvement in redesigning the berland Park Decides group make opportunities.
Recommended publications
  • Residential Update
    Residential update UK Residential Research | January 2018 South East London has benefitted from a significant facelift in recent years. A number of regeneration projects, including the redevelopment of ex-council estates, has not only transformed the local area, but has attracted in other developers. More affordable pricing compared with many other locations in London has also played its part. The prospects for South East London are bright, with plenty of residential developments raising the bar even further whilst also providing a more diverse choice for residents. Regeneration catalyst Pricing attraction Facelift boosts outlook South East London is a hive of residential Pricing has been critical in the residential The outlook for South East London is development activity. Almost 5,000 revolution in South East London. also bright. new private residential units are under Indeed pricing is so competitive relative While several of the major regeneration construction. There are also over 29,000 to many other parts of the capital, projects are completed or nearly private units in the planning pipeline or especially compared with north of the river, completed there are still others to come. unbuilt in existing developments, making it has meant that the residential product For example, Convoys Wharf has the it one of London’s most active residential developed has appealed to both residents potential to deliver around 3,500 homes development regions. within the area as well as people from and British Land plan to develop a similar Large regeneration projects are playing further afield. number at Canada Water. a key role in the delivery of much needed The competitively-priced Lewisham is But given the facelift that has already housing but are also vital in the uprating a prime example of where people have taken place and the enhanced perception and gentrification of many parts of moved within South East London to a more of South East London as a desirable and South East London.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 09 19 South Lambeth Estate
    LB LAMBETH EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 2018 SOUTH LAMBETH ESTATE REGENERATION PROGRAMME www.ottawaystrategic.co.uk $es1hhqdb.docx 1 5-Dec-1810-Aug-18 Equality Impact Assessment Date August 2018 Sign-off path for EIA Head of Equalities (email [email protected]) Director (this must be a director not responsible for the service/policy subject to EIA) Strategic Director or Chief Exec Directorate Management Team (Children, Health and Adults, Corporate Resources, Neighbourhoods and Growth) Procurement Board Corporate EIA Panel Cabinet Title of Project, business area, Lambeth Housing Regeneration policy/strategy Programme Author Ottaway Strategic Management Ltd Job title, directorate Contact email and telephone Strategic Director Sponsor Publishing results EIA publishing date EIA review date Assessment sign off (name/job title): $es1hhqdb.docx 2 5-Dec-1810-Aug-18 LB Lambeth Equality Impact Assessment South Lambeth Estate Regeneration Programme Independently Reported by Ottaway Strategic Management ltd August 2018 Contents EIA Main Report 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 4 2 Introduction and context ....................................................................................... 12 3 Summary of equalities evidence held by LB Lambeth ................................................ 17 4 Primary Research: Summary of Household EIA Survey Findings 2017 ........................ 22 5 Equality Impact Assessment ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Have 'Mixed Communities' Policies and Some Difficulties In
    Notes for Haringey Housing and Regeneration Scrutiny Panel Dr Jane Lewis London Metropolitan University April 3rd 2017 Dr Jane Lewis • Dr Jane Lewis is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology and Social Policy at London Metropolitan University. She has worked previously as a lecturer in urban regeneration and in geography as well as in urban regeneration and economic development posts in local government in London. Jane has wide experience teaching at under-graduate and post-graduate levels with specific expertise in urban inequalities; globalisation and global inequalities; housing and urban regeneration policy and is course leader of the professional doctorate programme in working lives and of masters’ courses in urban regeneration and sustainable cities dating back to 2005.Jane has a research background in cities and in urban inequalities, urban regeneration policy and economic and labour market conditions and change. aims • 1. Invited following presentation Haringey Housing Forum on concerns relating to council estate regeneration schemes in London in name of mixed communities polices • 2. Senior Lecturer Social Policy at LMU (attached note) • 3. Terms of reference of Scrutiny Panel focus on 1and 2 – relating to rehousing of council tenants in HDV redevelopments and to 7 – equalities implications Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV) and Northumberland Park • ‘development projects’ proposed for the first phase of the HDV include Northumberland Park Regeneration Area – includes 4 estates, Northumberland Park estate largest • Northumberland Park
    [Show full text]
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Council Housing For?
    ‘We thought it was Buckingham Palace’ ‘Homes for Heroes’ Cottage Estates Dover House Estate, Putney, LCC (1919) Cottage Estates Alfred and Ada Salter Wilson Grove Estate, Bermondsey Metropolitan Borough Council (1924) Tenements White City Estate, LCC (1938) Mixed Development Somerford Grove, Hackney Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Neighbourhood Units The Lansbury Estate, Poplar, LCC (1951) Post-War Flats Spa Green Estate, Finsbury Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Berthold Lubetkin Post-War Flats Churchill Gardens Estate, City of Westminster (1951) Architectural Wars Alton East, Roehampton, LCC (1951) Alton West, Roehampton, LCC (1953) Multi-Storey Housing Dawson’s Heights, Southwark Borough Council (1972) Kate Macintosh The Small Estate Chinbrook Estate, Lewisham, LCC (1965) Low-Rise, High Density Lambeth Borough Council Central Hill (1974) Cressingham Gardens (1978) Camden Borough Council Low-Rise, High Density Branch Hill Estate (1978) Alexandra Road Estate (1979) Whittington Estate (1981) Goldsmith Street, Norwich City Council (2018) Passivhaus Mixed Communities ‘The key to successful communities is a good mix of people: tenants, leaseholders and freeholders. The Pepys Estate was a monolithic concentration of public housing and it makes sense to break that up a bit and bring in a different mix of incomes and people with spending power.’ Pat Hayes, LB Lewisham, Director of Regeneration You have castrated communities. You have colonies of low income people, living in houses provided by the local authorities, and you have the higher income groups living in their own colonies. This segregation of the different income groups is a wholly evil thing, from a civilised point of view… We should try to introduce what was always the lovely feature of English and Welsh villages, where the doctor, the grocer, the butcher and the farm labourer all lived in the same street – the living tapestry of a mixed community.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London `Sink Estate'
    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2020, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 20–33 DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i1.2395 Article Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’ Paul Watt Department of Geography, Birkbeck, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 4 August 2019 | Accepted: 9 December 2019 | Published: 27 February 2020 Abstract This article offers a critical assessment of Loic Wacquant’s influential advanced marginality framework with reference to research undertaken on a London public/social housing estate. Following Wacquant, it has become the orthodoxy that one of the major vectors of advanced marginality is territorial stigmatisation and that this particularly affects social housing es- tates, for example via mass media deployment of the ‘sink estate’ label in the UK. This article is based upon a multi-method case study of the Aylesbury estate in south London—an archetypal stigmatised ‘sink estate.’ The article brings together three aspects of residents’ experiences of the Aylesbury estate: territorial stigmatisation and dissolution of place, both of which Wacquant focuses on, and housing conditions which he neglects. The article acknowledges the deprivation and various social problems the Aylesbury residents have faced. It argues, however, that rather than internalising the extensive and intensive media-fuelled territorial stigmatisation of their ‘notorious’ estate, as Wacquant’s analysis implies, residents have largely disregarded, rejected, or actively resisted the notion that they are living in an ‘estate from hell,’ while their sense of place belonging has not dissolved. By contrast, poor housing—in the form of heating breakdowns, leaks, infes- tation, inadequate repairs and maintenance—caused major distress and frustration and was a more important facet of their everyday lives than territorial stigmatisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (591Kb)
    This is the author’s version of the article, first published in Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, Volume 8 / Number 2 / Winter, 2014-15, pp. 133- 144 (12). https://www.henrystewartpublications.com/jurr Understanding and measuring social sustainability Email [email protected] Abstract Social sustainability is a new strand of discourse on sustainable development. It has developed over a number of years in response to the dominance of environmental concerns and technological solutions in urban development and the lack of progress in tackling social issues in cities such as inequality, displacement, liveability and the increasing need for affordable housing. Even though the Sustainable Communities policy agenda was introduced in the UK a decade ago, the social dimensions of sustainability have been largely overlooked in debates, policy and practice around sustainable urbanism. However, this is beginning to change. A combination of financial austerity, public sector budget cuts, rising housing need, and public & political concern about the social outcomes of regeneration, are focusing attention on the relationship between urban development, quality of life and opportunities. There is a growing interest in understanding and measuring the social outcomes of regeneration and urban development in the UK and internationally. A small, but growing, movement of architects, planners, developers, housing associations and local authorities advocating a more ‘social’ approach to planning, constructing and managing cities. This is part of an international interest in social sustainability, a concept that is increasingly being used by governments, public agencies, policy makers, NGOs and corporations to frame decisions about urban development, regeneration and housing, as part of a burgeoning policy discourse on the sustainability and resilience of cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Estate Regeneration
    ESTATE REGENERATION sourcebook Estate Regeneration Sourcebook Content: Gavin McLaughlin © February 2015 Urban Design London All rights reserved [email protected] www.urbandesignlondon.com Cover image: Colville Phase 2 Karakusevic Carson Architects 2 Preface As we all struggle to meet the scale and complexity of London’s housing challenges, it is heartening to see the huge number of successful estate regeneration projects that are underway in the capital. From Kidbrooke to Woodberry Down, Clapham Park to Graeme Park, South Acton to West Hendon, there are estates being transformed all across London. All are complicated, but most are moving ahead with pace, delivering more homes of all tenures and types, to a better quality, and are offering improved accommodation, amenities and environments for existing residents and newcomers alike. The key to success in projects as complex as estate regeneration lies in the quality of the partnerships and project teams that deliver them and, crucially, in the leadership offered by local boroughs. That’s why I welcome this new resource from UDL as a useful tool to help those involved with such projects to see what’s happening elsewhere and to use the networks that London offers to exchange best practice. Learning from the successes – and mistakes – of others is usually the key to getting things right. London is a fascinating laboratory of case studies and this new sourcebook is a welcome reference point for those already working on estate regeneration projects or those who may be considering doing so in the future. David Lunts Executive Director of Housing and Land at the GLA Introduction There is a really positive feeling around estate regeneration in London at the moment.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR Report Template
    BNP Paribas Real Estate & Astor Property Group 39 424.04033.00003 Glossop Road, Gamesley December 2014 DRAWING 2 RESULTS OF BAT SURVEY SLR BNP Paribas Real Estate & Astor Property Group 40 424.04033.00003 Glossop Road, Gamesley December 2014 APPENDIX A TARGET NOTES TO EXTENDED PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY (DRAWING 1) Target Note Description Area of largely native scrub, shrub and trees. Species include silver birch, guelder rose Viburnum opulus, goat willow Salix caprea, elder 1 Sambucus nigra, ash Fraxinus excelsior, cherry Prunus sp. and dogwood Cornus sanguinea. 2 Stand of Japanese knotweed measuring approximately 20m by 3m. Railway embankment, consisting of scrub and tall ruderal to the west, 3 graduating to oak and birch woodland to the east. Small stands of bracken also occur. SLR BNP Paribas Real Estate & Astor Property Group 41 424.04033.00003 Glossop Road, Gamesley December 2014 APPENDIX B PROTOCOL FOR WORKING IN AREAS THAT MIGHT SUPPORT BATS General Protocol for Demolition of Buildings If bats are found within a site being demolished / stripped, or if further advice is needed, it is recommended that contractors contact either ‘Bat Line’ (0845 1300228), or SLR Consulting (0114 290 3628 / 07971462696) immediately. In cases where specialist ecological surveys have indicated the possible presence of bats, but where bats themselves or signs of bats (such as droppings) have not been detected, it is essential that demolition is carried out in an appropriate and sensitive manner. It should be noted that where bat roosts are found and have potential to be affected by site development, a European Protected Species License (EPSL) from Natural England is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for Wales
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT THE MAIN GUILDHALL, HIGH STREET, KINGSTON UPON THAMES ON FRIDAY 28 OCTOBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/22 ______________________________ Time noted: 9.12 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the second day of the hearing here at Kingston. I am Howard Simmons, the Lead Assistant Commissioner responsible for chairing this session, and my colleague Tim Bowden is here from the Boundary Commission, who may want to say something about the administrative arrangements. MR BOWDEN: Thank you very much indeed, Howard, and good morning. We are scheduled to run until 5 pm today. Obviously, Howard can vary that at his discretion. We have quite a number of speakers. I think so far we have about 29 or 30 pre-booked and the first one is due to start in a couple of moments. Just a few housekeeping rules for the day. We are not expecting any fire alarms. If one does go off, it is out of this door and down the stairs and the meeting point is outside the front of the building; toilets out of the back door, please; ladies to the right, gents down the corridor to the left. Can you keep mobile phones on silent or switched off. If you want to take a call please go out of the back of the room.
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Evidence Virginia Blackman Avison Young
    Proof of Evidence Virginia Blackman Avison Young July 2019 THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET (WEST HENDON REGENERATION AREA) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER (No 3) 2018 REFERENCE: APP/PCU/CPOH/N5090/3218378 Proof of Evidence Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Scope of Evidence ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 3. The need for the inclusion of all the land & interests .............................................................................................. 2 4. The Requirements of Government Guidance ......................................................................................................... 3 5. Compensation principles and the framework for undertaking regulations ....................................................... 4 6. Undertaking negotiations ............................................................................................................................................ 8 7. Update on negotiations ............................................................................................................................................... 9 8. Open Space ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 9. Responses to objections............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]