DOCSLIB.ORG

The Churches of Asia Minor Article for Unit 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Churches of Asia Minor Article for Unit 1 4 5 The Churches of Asia Minor Article for Unit 1 N THE SUMMER OF 1978 my wife and I, along with like Timothy and Titus. In brief, it appears that consider- Iour two sons who were teenagers at the time, spent able church planting was carried out in the province of three weeks tent-camping throughout Turkey. My family Asia, under Paul’s direction from Ephesus, during his enjoyed the adventure, and—as part of a larger research third missionary journey. project—I had opportunity to visit personally many an- cient sites of considerable importance in the New Testa- Peter: A Letter to Christians in Asia Minor ment. First Peter is addressed to “God’s elect, strangers in The western half of modern-day Turkey corresponds the world, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappa- to a wide geographical area called Asia Minor in the docia, Asia and Bithynia” (1 Peter 1:1). We do not know first century. The Romans organized this vast area into whether Peter ever personally travelled these areas in four official “provinces”: Galatia, Cappadocia, and Asia; Asia Minor. If not, it is obvious he had direct sources of Bithynia and Pontus were combined into a fourth large information concerning his addressees from others who province (all named in 1 Peter 1:1). had. Mark is named in 1 Peter 5:13. He had been a com- panion of Paul and Barnabas on the beginning leg of the Paul: Church Planting in Asia Minor first missionary journey (Acts 12:25). Later, he became The good news reached parts of this region prior to a close associate of the apostle Peter; Peter called him Paul’s three missionary journeys. Included among those “my son.” Silas is named in 1 Peter 5:12. Silas had served present on the day of Pentecost were “residents of…Cap- as Paul’s primary companion on the second missionary padocia, Pontus and Asia” (Acts 2:9). Probably returning journey (Acts 15:22-18:5). Later, Silas too became a close home after Pentecost, like the believers who “scattered” associate of Peter, “a faithful brother”: he served as the following Stephen’s martyrdom, “they preached the word secretary for 1 Peter (5:12). Either of these men, both ex- wherever they went” (Acts 8:4). perienced missionary evangelists, probably had traveled A decade later, the apostle Paul began his missionary the areas named in 1 Peter 1:1 and provided the link to the work in Asia Minor. On his first missionary journey (Acts apostle Peter. Whether or not Peter ever personally trav- 13—14), he preached the gospel and formally organized elled Asia Minor (he may have, we simply do not know), 1 several churches in the southern portion of Galatia. Peter documents and preserves his personal ministry to Shortly after this mission, he wrote his Epistle to the Gala- the Christians of these areas. tians. Subsequently, Paul revisited these churches during both his second and third missionary journeys (Acts 16:6; John: Resident Church Leader in Asia 18:23). The apostle John, “the disciple whom Jesus loved” On his second missionary journey, as he was travel- (John 21:20), was the youngest of the twelve disciples, ing through the interior of Asia Minor, Paul considered about the same age as Jesus or perhaps a few years young- going north into Bithynia, but “the Spirit of Jesus would er. He also was the disciple who lived the longest (into his not allow him” (Acts 16:7). He also was disallowed from nineties), and simply identified himself in 2 John 1:1 and proceeding south into the province of Asia (Acts 16:6). 2 John 1:1 as “the Elder.” According to a strong tradition On his third missionary journey, however, he was able dating back into the 2nd century, John authored not only to spend more than two years in Ephesus, the capital city the gospel and the three letters that carry his name, but of this large and important province. Moreover, dur- also the book of Revelation. ing this time “all the Jews and Greeks who lived in the It is Revelation that links John most directly to the province of Asia heard the word of the Lord” (Acts 19:10). churches of Asia Minor. Seven of the churches in Asia This spreading of the gospel likely included the planting (the name of the Roman province located in the south- of “the seven churches of Asia” named in the book of Rev- west of the larger region of Asia Minor) are specifically elation (Revelation 2—3). We know that churches were addressed in Revelation (see 1:11). The “letters” in also planted in Colossae and Hierapolis, since both are chapters 2—3 show that John was quite familiar with the named in Paul’s Epistle to the Colossians (4:13), alongside topography of Asia, and well acquainted with each of the the neighboring church of Laodicea (one of the “seven churches. churches” of Revelation). We also learn from this letter John was the disciple to whom Jesus committed His that the church at Colossae was planted not by Paul but by mother Mary while He was dying on the cross (John Epaphras (1:7; 4:12), one of Paul’s (younger) colleagues 19:26). According to tradition, sometime following Jesus’ 5 death and resurrection, John moved to Ephesus, bringing of 2 John, we are not sure whether the Greek underlying Mary with him. John spent the final decades of his life “the chosen lady and her children” (1:1; see also 1:4-5) (perhaps AD 70-100), serving as the resident leader of the referred to a woman (otherwise unknown) or (metaphori- Christian churches in Asia. Some writers have labeled cally) to a local congregation. On either interpretation, him the “Bishop of Asia”; however, we do not know wheth- it was addressed to a specific situation, with which the er he held that title. But it stands to reason that as the last “elder” was quite familiar. In the case of 3 John, the ad- surviving “disciple” and an aged man, he would have been dressee was an individual person known to the author; accorded respect as a prime leader of the church. he described him as “my dear friend Gaius” (1:1, 2). Two This narrative of John’s life and ministry in Ephesus other men are also mentioned by name in this brief letter. and the province of Asia are based on a solid historical The author (presumably John) knew all three individuals tradition; moreover, it is consistent with the biblical data personally. Near the end of both 2 and 3 John, the author represented in Revelation 1—3. At the time of receiv- indicated that he had more to say, but chose not to put it ing “the revelation” (1:1, 9-11), John was on the island of into writing, preferring instead to talk “face to face.” In Patmos. This small island lay about 50 miles southwest 3 John 1:13 he added, “I hope to see you soon”; in 2 John of Ephesus in the Aegean Sea. It served the Romans as a 1:12, “I hope to visit you.” place for exiled prisoners, who worked the mines. John The evidence is clear: the author of these letters had a used the terms “hardships” and “perseverance in Jesus” close relationship with the people and churches to which when he named his location as Patmos (1:10). they were addressed. If the tradition concerning John can Although scholars debate the actual order and dating be trusted (and I believe it can be), it was “the disciple of the five books associated with John, many agree that whom Jesus loved” who wrote them. As an “elder,” both in Revelation was his last, written during the reign of Domi- years and in the church, the apostle lived the final decades tian about AD 96, when the apostle was approximately of his life as a church leader and minister in the province that same age. According to tradition, he was buried in of Asia. And it was there that he received “the revelation” Ephesus. addressed especially to seven of the churches in Asia. The letters of John, unlike Revelation, make no men- First the apostle Paul, then the apostle Peter, and tion of Asia. However, because of the strong link of the finally the apostle John—all three had relationships with apostle John to Ephesus (and nothing to the contrary), it the believers and churches of Asia Minor. John’s leader- is assumed that the letters of 1, 2, 3 John also were writ- ship among the churches in the province of Asia was espe- ten to churches in the region where he lived out his final cially significant, because he served as resident minister years. among the people over a long period of time. First John was not addressed to any specific group or individual. Scholars describe it as “a circular letter.” BY WAYNE McCOWN Presumably, it was meant for any and all the churches of provost emeritus of Roberts Wesleyan College and dean emeritus of Asia, and was circulated from one to the next. In the case Northeastern Seminary, Rochester, New York..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 295 Emanuela Borgia (Rome) CILICIA and the ROMAN EMPIRE
    EMANUELA BORGIA, CILICIA AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE STUDIA EUROPAEA GNESNENSIA 16/2017 ISSN 2082-5951 DOI 10.14746/seg.2017.16.15 Emanuela Borgia (Rome) CILICIA AND THE ROMAN EMPIRE: REFLECTIONS ON PROVINCIA CILICIA AND ITS ROMANISATION Abstract This paper aims at the study of the Roman province of Cilicia, whose formation process was quite long (from the 1st century BC to 72 AD) and complicated by various events. Firstly, it will focus on a more precise determination of the geographic limits of the region, which are not clear and quite ambiguous in the ancient sources. Secondly, the author will thoroughly analyze the formation of the province itself and its progressive Romanization. Finally, political organization of Cilicia within the Roman empire in its different forms throughout time will be taken into account. Key words Cilicia, provincia Cilicia, Roman empire, Romanization, client kings 295 STUDIA EUROPAEA GNESNENSIA 16/2017 · ROME AND THE PROVINCES Quos timuit superat, quos superavit amat (Rut. Nam., De Reditu suo, I, 72) This paper attempts a systematic approach to the study of the Roman province of Cilicia, whose formation process was quite long and characterized by a complicated sequence of historical and political events. The main question is formulated drawing on – though in a different geographic context – the words of G. Alföldy1: can we consider Cilicia a „typical” province of the Roman empire and how can we determine the peculiarities of this province? Moreover, always recalling a point emphasized by G. Alföldy, we have to take into account that, in order to understand the characteristics of a province, it is fundamental to appreciate its level of Romanization and its importance within the empire from the economic, political, military and cultural points of view2.
    [Show full text]
  • Keltoi and Hellenes: a Study of the Celts in the Hellenistic World
    KELTOI AND THE HELLENES A STUDY OF THE CELTS IN THE HELLENISTIC WoRU) PATRICK EGAN In the third century B.C. a large body ofCeltic tribes thrust themselves violently into the turbulent world of the Diadochoi,’ immediately instilling fear, engendering anger and finally, commanding respect from the peoples with whom they came into contact. Their warlike nature, extreme hubris and vigorous energy resembled Greece’s own Homeric past, but represented a culture, language and way of life totally alien to that of the Greeks and Macedonians in this period. In the years that followed, the Celts would go on to ravage Macedonia, sack Delphi, settle their own “kingdom” and ifil the ranks of the Successors’ armies. They would leave indelible marks on the Hellenistic World, first as plundering barbaroi and finally, as adapted, integral elements and members ofthe greatermulti-ethnic society that was taking shape around them. This paper will explore the roles played by the Celts by examining their infamous incursions into Macedonia and Greece, their phase of settlement and occupation ofwhat was to be called Galatia, their role as mercenaries, and finally their transition and adaptation, most noticeably on the individual level, to the demands of the world around them. This paper will also seek to challenge some of the traditionally hostile views held by Greek historians regarding the role, achievements, and the place the Celts occupied as members, not simply predators, of the Hellenistic World.2 19 THE DAWN OF THE CELTS IN THE HELLENISTIC WORLD The Celts were not unknown to all Greeks in the years preceding the Deiphic incursion of February, 279.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHURCHES of GALATIA. PROFESSOR WM RAMSAY's Very
    THE CHURCHES OF GALATIA. NOTES ON A REGENT CONTROVERSY. PROFESSOR W. M. RAMSAY'S very interesting and impor­ tant work on The Church in the Roman Empire has thrown much new light upon the record of St. Paul's missionary journeys in Asia Minor, and has revived a question which of late years had seemingly been set at rest for English students by the late Bishop Lightfoot's Essay on "The Churches of Galatia" in the Introduction to his Commen­ tary on the Epistle to the Galatians. The question, as there stated (p. 17), is whether the Churches mentioned in Galatians i. 2 are to be placed in "the comparatively small district occupied by the Gauls, Galatia properly so called, or the much larger territory in­ cluded in the Roman province of that name." Dr. Lightfoot, with admirable fairness, first points out in a very striking passage some of the " considerations in favour of the Roman province." " The term 'Galatia,' " he says, " in that case will comprise not only the towns of Derbe and Lystra, but also, it would seem, !conium and the Pisidian Antioch; and we shall then have in the narrative of St. Luke (Acts xiii. 14-xiv. 24) a full and detailed account of the founding of the Galatian Churches." " It must be confessed, too, that this view has much to recom­ mend it at first sight. The Apostle's account of his hearty and enthusiastic welcome by the Galatians as an angel of God (iv. 14), would have its counterpart in the impulsive warmth of the barbarians at Lystra, who would have sacri­ ficed to him, imagining that 'the gods had come down in VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh First Published November 2011, Updated to October 2016
    Was Galatian Really Celtic? Anthony Durham & Michael Goormachtigh first published November 2011, updated to October 2016 Summary Saint Jerome’s AD 386 remark that the language of ancient Galatia (around modern Ankara) resembled the language of the Treveri (around modern Trier) has been misinterpreted. The “Celts”, “Gauls” or “Galatians” mentioned by classical authors, including those who invaded Greece and Anatolia around 277 BC, were not Celtic in the modern sense of speaking a Celtic language related to Welsh and Irish, but tall, pale-skinned, hairy, warrior peoples from the north. The 150 or so words and proper names currently known from Galatian speech show little affinity with Celtic but more with Germanic. Introduction In AD 386 Saint Jerome wrote: Apart from the Greek language, which is spoken throughout the entire East, the Galatians have their own language, almost the same as the Treveri. For many people this short remark is the linchpin of a belief that ancient Celtic speech spread far outside its Atlantic-fringe homeland, reaching even into the heart of Anatolia, modern Turkey. However, we wish to challenge the idea that Galatians spoke a language that was Celtic in the modern sense of being closely related to Welsh or Irish. Galatia was the region around ancient Ancyra, modern Ankara, in the middle of Turkey. Anatolia (otherwise known as Asia Minor) has seen many civilisations come and go over the millennia. Around 8000 BC it was a cradle of agriculture and the Neolithic revolution. The whole family of Indo-European languages originated somewhere in that region. We favour the idea that they grew up around the Black Sea all the way from northern Anatolia, past the mouth of the river Danube, to southern Russia and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1
    CHAPTER 38 THE GEOGRAPHY OF GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 Mark Wilson KEY POINTS • Galatia is both a region and a province in central Asia Minor. • The main cities of north Galatia were settled by the Gauls in the third cen- tury bc. • The main cities of south Galatia were founded by the Greeks starting in the third century bc. • Galatia became a Roman province in 25 bc, and the Romans established colonies in many of its cities. • Pamphylia was part of Galatia in Paul’s day, so Perga and Attalia were cities in south Galatia. GALATIA AS A REGION and their families who migrated from Galatia is located in a basin in north-cen- Thrace in 278 bc. They had been invited tral Asia Minor that is largely flat and by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to serve as treeless. Within it are the headwaters of mercenaries in his army. The Galatians the Sangarius River (mode rn Sakarya) were notorious for their destructive and the middle course of the Halys River forays, and in 241 bc the Pergamenes led (modern Kızılırmak). The capital of the by Attalus I defeated them at the battle Hittite Empire—Hattusha (modern of the Caicus. The statue of the dying Boğazköy)—was in eastern Galatia near Gaul, one of antiquity’s most noted the later site of Tavium. The name Galatia works of art, commemorates that victo- derives from the twenty thousand Gauls ry. 1 The three Galatian tribes settled in 1 . For the motif of dying Gauls, see Brigitte Kahl, Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 77–127.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REACH of the ROMAN EMPIRE in ROUGH CILICIA by HUGHW.ELTON
    THE ECONOMIC FRINGE: THE REACH OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE IN ROUGH CILICIA By HUGHW.ELTON Many discussions of the Roman economy are rather vague about what they mean by 'Roman'. Phrases such as 'Roman Europe' or 'the Roman Empire' often blur two different concepts, that of the cultures of Iron Age Europe and the political institution of the Roman Empire. Cultures in Iron Age Europe varied widely. The Welsh uplands or the Atlas mountains, for example, had an aceramic culture with few public buildings, though were mIed directly by Rome for several centuries. Other regions, not under Roman control, like the regions across the middle Danube, showed higher concentrations of Mediterranean consumer goods and coins than some of these aceramic areas. 1 In Mesopotamia, many societies were urban and literate, not differing in this respect from those in Italy or Greece. Thus, determining what was imperial Roman territory by archaeological criteria alone is very difficult? But these archaeological criteria are important for two reasons. First, they allow us to analyse the cultural and economic changes that occurred in Iron Age Europe between 100 B.C. and A.D. 250. Second, they allow for the possibility of change within Europe that was not caused by the Roman state? Unlike cultures within Iron Age Europe, the Roman Empire was a political structure, imposed by force and dedicated to extracting benefits for the mling elite of the city of Rome.4 As the empire developed and matured, its form changed, but it was never about the mIed, only the rulers. If we accept that the Empire was a political, not an archaeological, structure, it follows that an examination of 'Impact of Empire: Transformation of Economic Life', has to mean an examination of the impact of the Roman imperial state.
    [Show full text]
  • Delphic Galatomachy and Roman Traditions of the Gallic Sack
    Narratives of Impiety and Epiphany: Delphic Galatomachy and Roman Traditions of the Gallic Sack Antti Lampinen In discussing the Gallic Sack of Rome, S. P. Oakley notes that ”[o]nly three things are certain about this episode: that it happened, that it left Rome with a long- lasting fear of Celts, and that virtually everything that our sources say about it is unbelievable” (Oakley 2004, 23). While this statement is, in essence, very true indeed, it is the word ‘unbelievable’ that I would like to draw attention to, for it could be argued that the ancient accounts mentioned by Oakley are not so much unbelievable as ill-understood. That they tell us frustratingly little of the actual nature of the historical incident is undeniable; as a source of Roman imagologies and narrative topoi concerning Gauls and their perceived antagonism towards Romans, however, these accounts are extremely useful. The allegedly unbelievable nature of our Roman sources that by its various discrepant narratives and suspicious duplicate scenes forms such a formidable barrier to a historian trying to uncover the hard facts surrounding the incident, can be explained and understood by analysing the literary context of its formation and imagological content. In this paper I study the formation and nature of Roman Republican literary narratives of the Gauls and their actions in Italy, beginning with earlier Greek accounts, which wielded considerable influence on later Roman conceptions of northern barbarians – especially when it comes to imagining the Gauls as impious despoilers and cruel adversaries of both gods and men.1 These images of religious as well as factual animosity are the essence of classical galatomachy, or depictions of Celts (or Gauls) as partially mythologised adversaries either in art or in literature, constructed with the help of the narrative motif of barbarism vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome and Near Eastern Kingdoms and Principalities, 44-31 BC: a Study of Political Relations During Civil War
    Durham E-Theses Rome and Near Eastern Kingdoms and Principalities, 44-31 BC: A Study of Political Relations During Civil War VAN-WIJLICK, HENDRIKUS,ANTONIUS,MARGAR How to cite: VAN-WIJLICK, HENDRIKUS,ANTONIUS,MARGAR (2013) Rome and Near Eastern Kingdoms and Principalities, 44-31 BC: A Study of Political Relations During Civil War , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9387/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ROME AND NEAR EASTERN KINGDOMS AND PRINCIPALITIES, 44-31 BC A study of political relations during civil war Hendrikus Antonius Margaretha VAN WIJLICK Abstract This thesis presents a critical analysis of the political relations between Rome on the one hand and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities on the other hand during the age of civil war from 44 until 31 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul's Epistle to the Galatians Introduction Paul's Letter to The
    Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians Introduction Paul’s letter to the Galatians is unique among the letters of Paul that have been passed down to us in the New Testament. Unlike the other letters, which begin with thanksgiving and move to encouragement, Galatians begins with outraged astonishment and moves through admonition. It ends almost as brusquely as it begins, though throughout Paul’s pastoral affection for the Galatians occasionally shines through and his hope for them remains evident. We cannot be sure exactly whom Paul had in mind when he addressed his letter to the churches at Galatia. “Galatia” was the name for a Roman territory. Paul could either be writing to inhabitants of the southern part of this territory, in southern Asia Minor, or he could be writing to ethnic “Galatians”—Celts who lived in the northern part of the province. Serious scholars disagree about which is more likely, trying to draw both internal evidence from our letter and external evidence from the Book of Acts. If we were sure about the intended recipients we might also be able to make a more informed guess about the date of the letter and along with that its temporal relationship to other Pauline writings, especially Romans. It would be nice to know the location of the intended recipients of this letter, but even without that information we are able to make some fairly clear inferences about Paul’s relationship to these churches. 1 Map of Asia Minor, Showing the Province of Galatia and the ethnic area of Galatia Paul’s “First Missionary Journey” took him through cities in the south part of the Province From the evidence of the first part of Galatians, Paul had not intended to include this territory as part of his mission work.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman North Africa North Roman
    EASTERNSOCIAL WORLDS EUROPEAN OF LATE SCREEN ANTIQUITY CULTURES AND THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES Cilliers Roman North Africa Louise Cilliers Roman North Africa Environment, Society and Medical Contribution Roman North Africa Social Worlds of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages The Late Antiquity experienced profound cultural and social change: the political disintegration of the Roman Empire in the West, contrasted by its continuation and transformation in the East; the arrival of ‘barbarian’ newcomers and the establishment of new polities; a renewed militarization and Christianization of society; as well as crucial changes in Judaism and Christianity, together with the emergence of Islam and the end of classical paganism. This series focuses on the resulting diversity within Late Antique society, emphasizing cultural connections and exchanges; questions of unity and inclusion, alienation and conflict; and the processes of syncretism and change. By drawing upon a number of disciplines and approaches, this series sheds light on the cultural and social history of Late Antiquity and the greater Mediterranean world. Series Editor Carlos Machado, University of St. Andrews Editorial Board Lisa Bailey, University of Auckland Maijastina Kahlos, University of Helsinki Volker Menze, Central European University Ellen Swift, University of Kent Enrico Zanini, University of Siena Roman North Africa Environment, Society and Medical Contribution Louise Cilliers Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Ruins of the Antonine Baths in Carthage © Dreamstime Stockphoto’s Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Typesetting: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6298 990 0 e-isbn 978 90 4854 268 0 doi 10.5117/9789462989900 nur 684 © Louise Cilliers / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2019 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Graeco-Roman Associations, Judean Synagogues and Early Christianity in Bithynia-Pontus*
    chapter 3 Graeco-Roman Associations, Judean Synagogues and Early Christianity in Bithynia-Pontus* Markus Öhler As has been shown in numerous studies, early Christian communities as well as synagogues of Judeans resemble Graeco-Roman associations in form and structure. Therefore, it makes sense to examine Christ groups from the first three centuries from the perspective of associations and synagogues in order to grasp the various characteristics of Christianity in this area up until the reign of Constantine. This article will begin with a brief geographical and historical overview of the regions composing the double province of Bithynia-Pontus, continue with a review of the inscriptional and literary evidence on associa- tions (including synagogues), and finally discuss early sources for a study of Christianity, namely, the New Testament, Pliny’s letter about Christians, and inscriptions from the second and third centuries with a potentially Christian background. 1 Bithynia and Pontus: The Area and Its History in Early Imperial Times The area of Bithynia et Pontus, which partly includes the region of Paphlagonia, has had a chequered history.1 In what follows, I will roughly focus on the territo- ries which formed a Roman double province from 63BC onward. This includes, from west to east, the region of Bithynia (from Kalchedon to Klaudiopolis and Tieion), Paphlagonia (from Amastris to Sinope), and Pontus (from Amisos to Nikopolis). Pontus had been a kingdom from Mithradates I until the death of Mithra- dates VI in 63BC. Afterwards, the western part, reaching as far as the city of Nikopolis, became part of the Roman province of Bithynia et Pontus which * Many thanks to Julien M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Impact of the Koinon in Roman Coastal Paphlagonia Chingyuan Wu University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 The Local Impact Of The Koinon In Roman Coastal Paphlagonia Chingyuan Wu University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Wu, Chingyuan, "The Local Impact Of The Koinon In Roman Coastal Paphlagonia" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3204. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3204 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3204 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Local Impact Of The Koinon In Roman Coastal Paphlagonia Abstract This dissertation studies the effects that a “koinon” in the Roman period could have on its constituent communities. The tudys traces the formation process of the koinon in Roman coastal Paphlagonia, called “the Koinon of the Cities in Pontus,” and its ability to affect local customs and norms through an assortment of epigraphic, literary, numismatic and archaeological sources. The er sults of the study include new readings of inscriptions, new proposals on the interpretation of the epigraphic record, and assessments on how they inform and change our opinion regarding the history and the regional significance of the coastal Paphlagonian koinon. This study finds that the Koinon of the Cities in Pontus in coastal Paphlagonia was a dynamic organisation whose membership and activities defined by the eparchic administrative boundary of the Augustan settlement and the juridical definition of the Pontic identity in the eparchic sense. The necessary process that forced the periodic selection of municipal peers to attain koinon leadership status not only created a socially distinct category of “koinon” elite but also elevated the koinon to extraordinary status based on consensus in the eparchia.
    [Show full text]