DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 72/Tuesday, April 14, 2020/Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 72/Tuesday, April 14, 2020/Rules Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 20593 This action amends Class E airspace, published yearly and effective on Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas designated as a surface area, by adding September 15. Designated as a Surface Area. a small extension to the northeast of the * * * * * Regulatory Notices and Analyses airport. The surface airspace extension ANM UT E2 Bryce Canyon, UT [Amended] is designed to contain IFR aircraft The FAA has determined that this descending below 1,000 feet above the regulation only involves an established Bryce Canyon Airport, UT (Lat. 37°42′23″ N, long. 112°08′45″W) surface. The amended surface area is body of technical regulations for which described as follows: That airspace frequent and routine amendments are That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.2-mile radius of the extending upward from the surface necessary to keep them operationally ° current, is non-controversial and airport, and 1 mile each side of the 047 within a 4.2-mile radius of the airport, bearing from the airport, extending from the and 1 mile each side of the 047° bearing unlikely to result in adverse or negative 4.2-mile radius to 5.4 miles northeast of from the airport, extending from the 4.2- comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a Bryce Canyon Airport. mile radius to 5.4 miles northeast of the ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Bryce Canyon Airport. Designated as an Extension to a Class D or Also, this action amends Class E ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 Class E Surface Area. airspace by establishing an area, * * * * * designated as an extension to a surface FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) area, to the southwest of the airport. does not warrant preparation of a ANM UT E4 Bryce Canyon, UT [New] This area is also designed to contain IFR regulatory evaluation as the anticipated Bryce Canyon Airport, UT aircraft descending below 1,000 feet impact is so minimal. Since this is a (Lat. 37°42′23″ N, long. 112°08′45″ W) routine matter that will only affect air above the surface and is described as That airspace extending upward from the follows: That airspace extending traffic procedures and air navigation, it surface within 1 mile each side of the 227° upward from the surface within 1 mile is certified that this rule, when bearing from the airport, extending from the each side of the 227° bearing from the promulgated, would not have a 4.2-mile radius to 7.8 miles southwest of significant economic impact on a airport, extending from the 4.2-mile Bryce Canyon Airport. substantial number of small entities radius to 7.8 miles southwest of the Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas under the criteria of the Regulatory Bryce Canyon Airport. Extending Upward from 700 Feet or More Flexibility Act. Additionally, this action amends Above the Surface of the Earth. Class E airspace, extending upward Environmental Review * * * * * from 700 feet above the surface, by The FAA has determined that this ANM UT E5 Bryce Canyon, UT [Amended] reducing the area to the east and action qualifies for categorical exclusion southeast of the airport. This area is Bryce Canyon Airport, UT under the National Environmental (Lat. 37°42′23″ N, long. 112°08′45″ W) designed to contain IFR arrivals Policy Act in accordance with FAA descending below 1,500 feet above the That airspace extending upward from 700 Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental feet above the surface within 8 miles north surface and IFR departures until Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ and 4.2 miles south of the 047° bearing from reaching 1,200 feet above the surface. paragraph 5–6.5a. This airspace action the airport, extending from the airport to 16 This area is described as follows: That is not expected to cause any potentially miles northeast of the airport, and within 8 airspace extending upward from 700 significant environmental impacts, and miles north and 4.2 miles south of the 227° feet above the surface within 8 miles no extraordinary circumstances exist bearing from the airport, extending from the north and 4.2 miles south of the 047° that warrant preparation of an airport to 16 miles southwest of Bryce bearing from the airport, extending from environmental assessment. Canyon Airport. the airport to 16 miles northeast of the Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 7, airport, and with 8 miles north and 4.2 List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 2020. miles south of the 227° bearing from the Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Shawn M. Kozica airport, extending from the airport to 16 Navigation (air). Group Manager, Western Service Center miles southwest of Bryce Canyon Adoption of the Amendment Operations Support Group. Airport. [FR Doc. 2020–07703 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am] In consideration of the foregoing, the Further, this action removes Class E BILLING CODE 4910–13–P airspace extending upward from 1,200 Federal Aviation Administration feet above the surface. This airspace is amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: wholly contained within the Denver en PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND route airspace and duplication is not B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR SECURITY necessary. TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND Lastly, this action makes an REPORTING POINTS Coast Guard administrative update to the Class E surface airspace’s legal descriptions. ■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 33 CFR Part 165 The surface airspace should be in effect part 71 continues to read as follows: [Docket Number USCG–2020–0061] full time. The following two sentences Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, do not accurately reflect the time of use 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, RIN 1625–AA00 and are removed. ‘‘This Class E airspace 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. area is effective during specific dates Safety Zone for Fireworks Displays; and times established in advance by a § 71.1 [Amended] Upper Potomac River, Washington Notice to Airmen. The effective date and ■ 2. The incorporation by reference in Channel, DC time will thereafter be continuously 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D, AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. published in the Airport/Facility Airspace Designations and Reporting ACTION: Temporary final rule. Directory.’’ Points, dated August 8, 2019, and FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace effective September 15, 2019, is SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is Designations and Reporting Points, is amended as follows: establishing a temporary safety zone for VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:06 Apr 13, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM 14APR1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES 20594 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations certain waters of the Upper Potomac the NPRM, and invited comments on after the scheduled fireworks display. River. This action is necessary to our proposed regulatory action related No vessel or person will be permitted to provide for the safety of life on these to these fireworks displays. During the enter the safety zone without obtaining navigable waters of the Washington comment period that ended March 16, permission from the COTP or a Channel adjacent to The Wharf DC, 2020, we received no comments. designated representative. Washington, DC, for recurring fireworks Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast V. Regulatory Analyses displays from April 4, 2020, through Guard finds that good cause exists for December 31, 2020. This regulation making this rule effective less than 30 We developed this rule after prohibits persons and vessels from days after publication in the Federal considering numerous statutes and being in the safety zone unless Register. Delaying the effective date of Executive orders related to rulemaking. authorized by the Captain of the Port this rule would be impracticable Below we summarize our analyses Maryland-National Capital Region or a because immediate action is needed to based on a number of these statutes and designated representative. respond to the potential safety hazards Executive orders, and we discuss First DATES: This rule is effective without associated with the fireworks displays, Amendment rights of protestors. actual notice from April 14, 2020 including the accidental discharge of A. Regulatory Planning and Review through December 31, 2020. For the fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 purposes of enforcement, actual notice falling hot embers or other debris. direct agencies to assess the costs and will be used from April 4, 2020, until III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule benefits of available regulatory April 14, 2020. The Coast Guard is issuing this rule alternatives and, if regulation is ADDRESSES: To view documents under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 necessary, to select regulatory mentioned in this preamble as being (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The approaches that maximize net benefits. available in the docket, go to https:// Captain of the Port Maryland-National Executive Order 13771 directs agencies www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2020– Capital Region (COTP) has determined to control regulatory costs through a 0061 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click that potential hazards associated with budgeting process. This rule has not ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket the fireworks to be used in these been designated a ‘‘significant Folder on the line associated with this displays will be a safety concern for regulatory action,’’ under Executive rule. anyone within 200 feet of the fireworks Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If barge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • United Airlines Flight 608 Accident Report
    .,SA-I 53 File No. 1-0097-47 ) CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD I ACCIDENT I W ESTIGATOO I I Adopted: February 2, 1948 . Released: February 3, 19y8 UNITED AIR LlhES, INC., BRYCE CANYON, UTAH, OCTOXR 24, 1947 The Accident - United Air Lines I Flight 608 crashed observed what appeared 'to be white smoke at 1229 MST,2 October 24, 1947, 1 1/2 streaming from the aircraft, followed miles southeast of Bryce Canyon Airport, later by dense black smoke. The first Utah, during an attempted emergency witnesses who observed fire in the bottom landing resulting from a fire in flight. of the aircr8ft at approximately the The aircraft, a Model DC-6, NC 37510, center-section were located approxi- was demolished by impact and fire, and mately 15 miles south of Bryce Canyon. all of the 46 passengers and the crew of Until shortly before the moment of im- 6 were killed. pact,. the aircraft appeared to be under normal control; hawever, no_,witnesses History of the FI ight were located who observed the, crash. Flight 608 departed Los Angeles, Cal- ifornia, at 1023 with its destination I nvest i gat ion Chicago, Illinois, to cruise at 19,000 Immediately after the accident the feet according to visual flight rules. wreckage was protected by Civil Aeronau- Routine position reports were made over tics Administration personnel until a Fontana, Daggett and Silver Lake, Cali- guard was established by the National' fornia; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Sdint Park Service, pending the arrival of George, Utah. During the latter report, Board investigators. During the evening the flight indicated that it estimated of the same day various investigation passing over Bryce Canyon, Utah, at 1222.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2, 2020 Notices to Airmen
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International January 2, 2020 Next Issue January 30, 2020 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team NOTICES TO AIRMEN - January 2, 2020 Part 2. INTERNATIONAL NOTICES TO AIRMEN Notices to Airmen International GENERAL This part features significant international notices to airmen (NOTAM) information and special notices. The information contained in the International Notices to Airmen section is derived from international notices and other official sources. International notices are of two types: Class One International Notices are those NOTAMs issued via telecommunications. They are made available to the U.S. flying public by the International NOTAM Office (Washington, DC) through the local Flight Service Station (FSS). Class Two International Notices are NOTAMs issued via postal services and are not readily available to the U.S. flying public. The International Notices to Airmen draws from both these sources and also includes information about temporary hazardous conditions which are not otherwise readily available to the flyer. Before any international flight, always update the International Notices to Airmen with a review of Class One International Notices available at your closest FSS. Foreign notices carried in this publication are carried as issued to the maximum extent possible. Most abbreviations used in this publication are listed in ICAO Document DOC 8400. Wherever possible, the source of the information is included at the end of an entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Northern Colorado Plateau Network
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Northern Colorado Plateau Network Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2006/002 ON THE COVER Hickman Bridge—Capitol Reef National Park Photograph copyrighted by Jim Ashby Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Northern Colorado Plateau Network Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2006/002 WRCC Report 06-03 Christopher A. Davey, Kelly T. Redmond, and David B. Simeral Western Regional Climate Center Desert Research Institute 2215 Raggio Parkway Reno, Nevada 89512-1095 August 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the National Park Service conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Garfield County, Utah Request for Statements of Qualifications for Airport Engineering Services for the Bryce Canyon Airport
    GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR AIRPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE BRYCE CANYON AIRPORT I. INTRODUCTION Garfield County, Utah, as sponsor of a public use airport facility, is soliciting for sealed Statements of Qualifications for the selection of a principal airport consultant to provide Engineering Services for the Bryce Canyon Airport. Submittals will be accepted until 3:00 p.m. (local time) on Friday, November 20, 2020 in the office of: Camille Moore 55 South Main Street, PO Box 77 Panguitch, Utah 84759 435-676-1100 The Sponsor plans to award a five- year contract for airport engineering services subject to review on an annual basis for any and all engineering projects subject to federal assistance under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended, or other sources of funding. The contract will be for the basic airport engineering consulting services as defined herein. Garfield County reserves the right to inquire into the prospective proposer’s ability to provide professional services, as defined below. The County also reserves the right to amend the Schedule of Projects and contract of Scope of Work at the sole discretion of Garfield County, Utah, on behalf of the Bryce Canyon Airport. Our selection process is intended to be in compliance with the FAA Advisory Circular AC-150/5100-14E “Architectural Engineering and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects.” RFQ AIRPORT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES | 1 II. BACKGROUND Bryce Canyon Airport is a general aviation airport located approximately one and one-half miles from Bryce, Utah. The Sponsor is seeking to implement improvements to accommodate existing and future aviation demands.
    [Show full text]
  • February 28, 2019 Notices to Airmen
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International February 28, 2019 Next Issue March 28, 2019 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team JANUARY − 2019 FEBRUARY − 2019 MARCH − 2019 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2ËËË3 4 5 1 2 1 2 ËËË 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ËËË ËË ËËË ËË ËËË ËËË 31 APRIL − 2019 MAY − 2019 JUNE − 2019 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11ÊÊÊ2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18ÊÊÊ9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ËË ËËË 21 22 23 24ËËË25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ËËË ËË ËËË 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ËËË 30 JULY − 2019 AUGUST − 2019 SEPTEMBER − 2019 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ËËË 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ËËË 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ËËË ËË ËËË ËËË ËË
    [Show full text]
  • O. A. Russell Color Transparency Collection AR.2008.002
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8sb4bkc No online items Guide to the O. A. Russell Color Transparency Collection AR.2008.002 Chris S. Ervin Mojave Desert Heritage and Cultural Association First Edition Mojave Desert Archives 2017-04-02 37918 Lanfair Road # G15 Essex, California 92332-9786 [email protected] URL: http://mojavedesertarchives.blogspot.com/ Guide to the O. A. Russell Color AR.2008.002 1 Transparency Collection AR.2008.002 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Mojave Desert Archives Title: O. A. Russell Color Transparency Collection creator: Russell, O. A. (Orville Alburtus), 1906-1998 creator: Russell, Esther Vanetta (Penrose), 1913-2003 Identifier/Call Number: AR.2008.002 Physical Description: 6.2 Linear Feet - 15 Deep Lid Boxes Physical Description: 7896 Photographic Transparencies Date (inclusive): 1950-1989 Abstract: The O. A. Russell Color Transparency Collection is a collection of nearly 8,000 color transparencies taken by O. A. Russell and his wife, Esther, during their annual automobile vacations away from managing their Calico Motel operation in Yermo, California. The Russells traveled throughout the western United States from the 1950s through the 1980s, visiting scenic locations in the states of Utah, Colorado, California, Arizona, and Nevada. Russell was an accomplished mid-century film photographer in an era before autofocus, built-in light meters, and digital images. Scope and Contents The O. A. Russell Color Transparency Collection is a collection of nearly 8,000 color transparencies of scenic vacation spots in the western United States. The photographic materials are comprised both 120 format and 35mm color film. This collection is arranged by state, location, and year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Airport Master Plan
    KANAB MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 2016 35 South 400 West, Suite 200 St. George, UT 84770 p. 435.673.4677 www.jviation.com The preparation of this document was supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration (Project Number 3-049-0013-013- 2015) as provided under Title 49 U.S.C., Section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this Airport Layout Plan by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance with appropriate public laws. Kanab Municipal Airport Master Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 1 NEW TERMINAL BUILDING ES-1 Kanab Municipal Airport Master Plan FIGURE 2 RECOMMENDED AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FORECAST - KANAB AIRPORT 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Operations 3,000 2,500 2,000 Source: Jviation. Note: Increase = 1.7% per year growth rate. ES-2 Kanab Municipal Airport Master Plan FIGURE 3 RECOMMENDED BASED AIRCRAFT FORECAST KANAB AIRPORT 35 33 31 29 27 25 23 Based Based aircraft 21 19 17 15 Source: Jviation. Note: Increase = 1.7% per year growth rate ES-3 Kanab Municipal Airport Master Plan FIGURE 4 RECOMMENDED AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ES-4 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Study Introduction & Goals.............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Master Plan Purpose and Objectives .................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Master Plan Study Elements .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination
    NFS Form 10-900 (7-81) United States Department off the Interior ^p National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections______________ 1. Name historic and/or common Public Works Buildings Thematic Resources 2. Location street & number See individual structure/site forms not for publication city, town __ vicinity of congressional district state code county code 3. Classification - See individual structure/site forms Category Ownership Status Present Use district public occupied agriculture museum building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence <?ite Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation __ no military Other! 4. Owner of Property name g ee individual structure/site forms street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. See individual structure/site forms street & number city, town state 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title See individual structure/site forms has this property been determined eligible? yes no date federal state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state /• DeSCriptiOH See individual structure/site forms Check one Check one __ deteriorated __ unaltered __ original site ^-O '. ruins __ altered __ moved date ___ fair _ Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance Overview Description The buildings contained in this nomination display a wide variety of architectural styles popular in the 1930-1940 period. Some, like the Spring- vine Art Museum, Carlson Hall at the University of Utah, and the Officers Club at Camp Williams, represent the continued use of earlier twentieth century styles such as the Spanish Colonial Reviyal, Seco.nd Reqaissanc? Revival, and English Tudor.
    [Show full text]
  • February 27, 2020 Notices to Airmen
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International February 27, 2020 Next Issue March 26, 2020 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team NOTICES TO AIRMEN - February 27, 2020 JANUARY − 2020 FEBRUARY − 2020 MARCH − 2020 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1ËËË2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ËËË 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ËËË 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31 ËËË ËË ËËË ËËË ËË APRIL − 2020 MAY − 2020 JUNE − 2020 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ÊÊÊ7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ËËË ÊÊÊÊÊ ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16ÊÊÊ14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ËËË ËË 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 ËËË25 26 27 ËËË ËË 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 ËËË 31 JULY − 2020 AUGUST − 2020 SEPTEMBER − 2020 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 ËËË 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ËËË 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Historic Aviation Properties
    NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN Technical information on the National Registerof Historic Places: survey, evaluation, registration, and preservation of cultural resources. U.S. Department of the Interior: - National Park Service Cultural Resources GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING AND DOCUMENTING HISTORIC AV IATION PROPERTIES The mission of the Department of Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibility to tribes. This material is partially based on work conducted under a cooperative agreement with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers and the U.S. Department of the Interior. Photograph caption, cover: Air mail pilot Marvin O'Dell (Louisville to Cleveland route), Bowman Field, Louisville, KY, ca. 1930. Bowman Field Historic District, Jefferson County,KY. (Photographer unknown, courtesy of Kentucky Heritage Council) NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING AND DOCUMENTING HISTORIC AVIATION PROPERTIES BY ANNE MILBROOKE with Patrick Andrus, Jody Cook, and David B. Whipple U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................. 6 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 7 Aviation is More than Airplanes ............................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are Laanc Facilities in My Area?
    WHERE ARE LAANC FACILITIES IN MY AREA? Updated with LAANC Expansion Facilities! December 2019 Houston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ZHU) Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport (BRO), Mobile Regional Airport (MOB), Salina Regional Airport (SLN), South Central Brownsville, TX Mobile, AL Salina, KS Easterwood Field (CLL), Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport (BTR), Philip Billard Municipal Airport (TOP), College Station, TX Baton Rouge, LA Topeka, KS Conroe-North Houston Regional Airport (CXO), Lafayette Regional Airport (LFT), Mount Vernon Airport (MVN), Houston, TX Lafayette, LA Mt Vernon, IL Scholes International At Galveston Airport (GLS), Austin–Bergstrom International Airport (AUS), Quincy Regional Airport (UIN), Galveston, TX Austin, TX Quincy, IL Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU), Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP), Chanute Martin Johnson Airport (CNU), Georgetown, TX Corpus Christi, TX Chanute, KS Valley International Airport (HRL), Aransas County Airport (RKP), Dodge City Regional Airport (DDC), Harlingen, TX Rockport, TX Dodge City, KS San Marcos Regional Airport (HYI), San Antonio International Airport (SAT), Emporia Municipal Airport (EMP), Austin, TX San Antonio, TX Emporia, KS Laredo International Airport (LRD), Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY), Hays Regional Airport (HYS), Laredo, TX Kenner, LA St, Hays, KS McAllen Miller International Airport (MFE), William P. Hobby Airport (HOU), Lawrence Municipal Airport (LWC), McAllen, TX Houston, TX Lawrence, KS Sugar Land Regional Airport
    [Show full text]