DOCSLIB.ORG

Reporting on the Women's Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reporting on the Women's Movement Bonnie J. Dow. Watching Women's Liberation, 1970: Feminism's Pivotal Year on the Network News. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2014. xii + 239 pp. $28.00, paper, ISBN 978-0-252-08016-6. Reviewed by Emily Dufton Published on H-1960s (May, 2015) Commissioned by Zachary J. Lechner (Centenary College of Louisiana) At the Miss America Pageant in Atlantic City Dow’s excellent new book Watching Women’s Lib‐ on September 7, 1968, several protesters from eration, 1970: Feminism’s Pivotal Year on the Net‐ New York Radical Women draped a women’s lib‐ work News, which combines the felds of media eration banner over the balcony, released stink and feminist studies to expose how truly remark‐ bombs containing Toni Home Permanent Solution able 1970 was. (an at-home perm product, which reportedly Dow’s purpose is both simple and complex: smelled like eggs), and chanted “No More Miss she seeks to “construct a historicized narrative of America” and “Freedom for Women,” before be‐ national broadcast representation of the second ing ejected from the venue. In the same way pro‐ wave as it evolved over the course of a single piv‐ fessional sportscasts refuse to show streakers, net‐ otal year” (p. 11). To do this, she moves chronolog‐ work television cameras were kept squarely on ically through the year, covering the “first, brief, the stage, equating coverage of the protestors’ an‐ hard news reports” in January that introduced the tics with dangerous encouragement. By refusing movement to the stations’ audiences, and then ex‐ to reveal the protests on screen, television execu‐ amining the March 18 sit-in at Ladies’ Home Jour‐ tives silenced the protestors and did their part to nal, an event that not only showed the move‐ uphold the country’s gendered status quo. ment’s growing power but also had the added But in 1970, the cameras abruptly turned and benefit of “precipitating significant changes in ed‐ women’s liberation took center stage. That year, itorial and employment practices at women’s second-wave feminism was a prominent story on magazines” (pp. 25-26). The fourth chapter covers all three major news networks (ABC, NBC, and the ABC News documentary Women’s Liberation, CBS), which collectively made the movement the aired that May, which presented the movement in subject of more than twenty discrete reports. That a comprehensible manner, analogizing it with the year, and this coverage, is at the heart of Bonnie J. civil rights movement and offering the Equal H-Net Reviews Rights Amendment (ERA) as the answer to wom‐ This is Dow’s most important contribution for en’s ills. The fnal two chapters cover the August those who study the social movements of the 26 Women’s Strike for Equality and the rise of Glo‐ 1960s and their effects. She details exactly how ria Steinem as “feminism’s enduring media icon” television promoted women’s liberation, how its (p. 28). Though Steinem barely appeared in any coverage of the movement excited and inspired media coverage in 1970, the “early mediated nar‐ women to join, and then how the networks al‐ ratives about women’s liberation and their inter‐ tered their coverage to characterize “women’s lib‐ action with the movement’s own media strategies bers” as radicalized man-haters, all in a single facilitated Steinem’s emergence as the antidote to year. It is a concise history of one way in which feminism’s image problems” (p. 28). White, liber‐ the hopefulness of the era was destroyed, and the al, moderate, and middle-class, as well as het‐ book’s depth makes it a useful text for a wide vari‐ eronormative and beautiful, Steinem, Dow main‐ ety of classes. tains, was the woman whom networks found Dow is a professor of communications and most appealing, and who became, for better or for women’s and gender studies at Vanderbilt Univer‐ worse, the movement’s most prominently mediat‐ sity, and, in Watching Women’s Liberation, she ed display. bridges her felds well. But she also draws from a Unlike the rest of the book, however, the frst number of other areas, including studies of flm, chapter moves away from 1970 to focus on the race, sexuality, media, and rhetoric, in order to 1968 Miss America protests, which were not cov‐ give her book the widest possible breadth. She is ered by network news at the time. Activists in particularly good at analyzing the shifts in New York Radical Women connected their actions rhetoric used to describe second-wave feminists to other New Left protests, but with little media and their goals, uncovering new meaning in old credibility and a shocking stance, the “bra burn‐ reports and tracing their impact on the stunted ing” myth was born. Nonetheless, widespread passage of the ERA. newspaper coverage made the Miss America It is Dow’s contribution to the history of femi‐ protests the origin story for second-wave femi‐ nism where Watching Women’s Liberation holds nism’s public debut. Underscoring the slow pace most sway. Students unfamiliar with how “bra- of network news at the time, Dow shows how it burning” and other manufactured myths about took over a year for television to catch up, and feminism took shape will fnd much to learn in even longer for it to refine and package its mes‐ Dow’s text, and it may help them evaluate the sage for viewers. Matter-of-fact and even positive rhetorical turns in coverage of women in the coverage was transformed over several months news today. Despite Dow’s book being focused until the movement was a caricature of itself, in squarely on 1970, the debates it uncovers and the which the image and rhetoric of second-wave consciousness it raises remain applicable even in feminism was distorted for an audience pre‐ 2015, at a moment when major media fgures con‐ sumed to be antagonistic to feminists’ goals and tinue to frame feminism in misguided but mean‐ overwhelmingly male. The revelation here is omi‐ ingful ways. One need not look much further than nous: how women’s liberation became a spectacle the treatment of Sandra Fluke in 2012 or of Zoe in the hands of American media, which elided the Quinn, the developer at the center of #Gamergate, diversity and pragmatism of the movement in fa‐ to see that women fghting for equality remain vor of (often exaggerated) claims of sexual initia‐ easy targets for media ire, which remains almost tives and the threat the movement held for dis‐ ritually concocted for the presumed white, male rupting traditional gender roles. audience that news organizations continue to 2 H-Net Reviews serve. What Dow contributes to this feld is insight into a moment when this treatment began, and what she reveals is the continued relevancy of her claim. If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-1960s Citation: Emily Dufton. Review of Dow, Bonnie J. Watching Women's Liberation, 1970: Feminism's Pivotal Year on the Network News. H-1960s, H-Net Reviews. May, 2015. URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=43116 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Radical Feminist Manifesto As Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, and Second Wave Resistance
    Southern Journal of Communication ISSN: 1041-794X (Print) 1930-3203 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsjc20 The radical feminist manifesto as generic appropriation: Gender, genre, and second wave resistance Kimber Charles Pearce To cite this article: Kimber Charles Pearce (1999) The radical feminist manifesto as generic appropriation: Gender, genre, and second wave resistance, Southern Journal of Communication, 64:4, 307-315, DOI: 10.1080/10417949909373145 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949909373145 Published online: 01 Apr 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 578 View related articles Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rsjc20 The Radical Feminist Manifesto as Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, And Second Wave Resistance Kimber Charles Pearce n June of 1968, self-styled feminist revolutionary Valerie Solanis discovered herself at the heart of a media spectacle after she shot pop artist Andy Warhol, whom she I accused of plagiarizing her ideas. While incarcerated for the attack, she penned the "S.C.U.M. Manifesto"—"The Society for Cutting Up Men." By doing so, Solanis appropriated the traditionally masculine manifesto genre, which had evolved from sov- ereign proclamations of the 1600s into a form of radical protest of the 1960s. Feminist appropriation of the manifesto genre can be traced as far back as the 1848 Seneca Falls Woman's Rights Convention, at which suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Coffin Mott, Martha Coffin, and Mary Ann McClintock parodied the Declara- tion of Independence with their "Declaration of Sentiments" (Campbell, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Controversies in the Women's and Lesbian/Gay Liberation Movements
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1985 Politics and pleasures : sexual controversies in the women's and lesbian/gay liberation movements. Lisa J. Orlando University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Orlando, Lisa J., "Politics and pleasures : sexual controversies in the women's and lesbian/gay liberation movements." (1985). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2489. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2489 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICS AND PLEASURES: SEXUAL CONTROVERSIES IN THE WOMEN'S AND LESBIAN/GAY LIBERATION MOVEMENTS A Thesis Presented By LISA J. ORLANDO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS September 1985 Political Science Department Politics and Pleasures: Sexual Controversies in the Uomen's and Lesbian/Gay Liberation Movements" A MASTERS THESIS by Lisa J. Orlando Approved by: Sheldon Goldman, Member Philosophy \ hi (UV .CVvAj June 21, 19S4 Dean Alfange, Jj' Graduate P ogram Department of Political Science Lisa J. Orlando © 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 All Rights Reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following friends who, in long and often difficult discussion, helped me to work through the ideas presented in this thesis: John Levin, Sheila Walsh, Christine Di Stefano, Tom Keenan, Judy Butler, Adela Pinch, Gayle Rubin, Betsy Duren, Ellen Willis, Ellen Cantarow, and Pam Mitchell.
    [Show full text]
  • Shulamith Firestone 1945–2012 2
    Shulamith Firestone 1945–2012 2 Photograph courtesy of Lori Hiris. New York, 1997. Memorial for Shulamith Firestone St. Mark’s Church in the Bowery, Parish Hall September 23, 2012 Program 4:00–6:00 pm Laya Firestone Seghi Eileen Myles Kathie Sarachild Jo Freeman Ti-Grace Atkinson Marisa Figueiredo Tributes from: Anne Koedt Peggy Dobbins Bev Grant singing May the Work That I Have Done Speak For Me Kate Millett Linda Klein Roxanne Dunbar Robert Roth 3 Open floor for remembrances Lori Hiris singing Hallelujah Photograph courtesy of Lori Hiris. New York, 1997. Reception 6:00–6:30 4 Shulamith Firestone Achievements & Education Writer: 1997 Published Airless Spaces. Semiotexte Press 1997. 1970–1993 Published The Dialectic of Sex, Wm. Morrow, 1970, Bantam paperback, 1971. – Translated into over a dozen languages, including Japanese. – Reprinted over a dozen times up through Quill trade edition, 1993. – Contributed to numerous anthologies here and abroad. Editor: Edited the first feminist magazine in the U.S.: 1968 Notes from the First Year: Women’s Liberation 1969 Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation 1970 Consulting Editor: Notes from the Third Year: WL Organizer: 1961–3 Activist in early Civil Rights Movement, notably St. Louis c.o.r.e. (Congress on Racial Equality) 1967–70 Founder-member of Women’s Liberation Movement, notably New York Radical Women, Redstockings, and New York Radical Feminists. Visual Artist: 1978–80 As an artist for the Cultural Council Foundation’s c.e.t.a. Artists’ Project (the first government funded arts project since w.p.a.): – Taught art workshops at Arthur Kill State Prison For Men – Designed and executed solo-outdoor mural on the Lower East Side for City Arts Workshop – As artist-in-residence at Tompkins Square branch of the New York Public Library, developed visual history of the East Village in a historical mural project.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Faludi How Shulamith Firestone Shaped Feminism The
    AMERICAN CHRONICLES DEATH OF A REVOLUTIONARY Shulamith Firestone helped to create a new society. But she couldn’t live in it. by Susan Faludi APRIL 15, 2013 Print More Share Close Reddit Linked In Email StumbleUpon hen Shulamith Firestone’s body was found Wlate last August, in her studio apartment on the fifth floor of a tenement walkup on East Tenth Street, she had been dead for some days. She was sixty­seven, and she had battled schizophrenia for decades, surviving on public assistance. There was no food in the apartment, and one theory is that Firestone starved, though no autopsy was conducted, by preference of her Orthodox Jewish family. Such a solitary demise would have been unimaginable to anyone who knew Firestone in the late nineteen­sixties, when she was at the epicenter of the radical­feminist movement, Firestone, top left, in 1970, at the beach, surrounded by some of the same women who, a reading “The Second Sex”; center left, with month after her death, gathered in St. Mark’s Gloria Steinem, in 2000; and bottom right, Church In­the­Bowery, to pay their respects. in 1997. Best known for her writings, Firestone also launched the first major The memorial service verged on radical­ radical­feminist groups in the country, feminist revival. Women distributed flyers on which made headlines in the late nineteen­ consciousness­raising, and displayed copies of sixties and early seventies with confrontational protests and street theatre. texts published by the Redstockings, a New York group that Firestone co­founded. The WBAI radio host Fran Luck called for the Tenth Street studio to be named the Shulamith Firestone Memorial Apartment, and rented “in perpetuity” to “an older and meaningful feminist.” Kathie Sarachild, who had pioneered consciousness­raising and coined the slogan “Sisterhood Is Powerful,” in 1968, proposed convening a Shulamith Firestone Women’s Liberation Memorial Conference on What Is to Be Done.
    [Show full text]
  • GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought
    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought Tuesday, Thursday 12-1.15 Fall Semester 2018 Professor Katrina Forrester Office Hours: Tuesday, Thursday 2-3 Office: CGIS K437 E-mail: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Leah Downey E-mail: [email protected] Course Description: What is feminism? What is patriarchy? What and who is a woman? How does gender relate to sexuality, and to class and race? Should housework be waged, should sex be for sale, and should feminists trust the state? This course is an introduction to feminist political thought since the mid-twentieth century. It introduces students to classic texts of late twentieth-century feminism, explores the key arguments that have preoccupied radical, socialist, liberal, Black, postcolonial and queer feminists, examines how these arguments have changed over time, and asks how debates about equality, work, and identity matter today. We will proceed chronologically, reading texts mostly written during feminism’s so-called ‘second wave’, by a range of influential thinkers including Simone de Beauvoir, Shulamith Firestone, bell hooks and Catharine MacKinnon. We will examine how feminists theorized patriarchy, capitalism, labor, property and the state; the relationship of claims of sex, gender, race, and class; the development of contemporary ideas about sexuality, identity, and gender; and how and whether these ideas change how fundamental problems in political theory are understood. 1 Course Requirements: Participation (25%) includes (a) active participation in discussion (15%); and (b) weekly responses: each week you will send 2-3 brief questions/ comments about the reading to your TF by 5pm the day before section (10%) Paper 1 (25%) 5-6 pages due October 18 4pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Liberation: Seeing the Revolution Clearly
    Sara M. EvanS Women’s Liberation: Seeing the Revolution Clearly Approximately fifty members of the five Chicago radical women’s groups met on Saturday, May 18, 1968, to hold a citywide conference. The main purposes of the conference were to create and strengthen ties among groups and individuals, to generate a heightened sense of common history and purpose, and to provoke imaginative pro- grammatic ideas and plans. In other words, the conference was an early step in the process of movement building. —Voice of Women’s Liberation Movement, June 19681 EvEry account of thE rE-EmErgEncE of feminism in the United States in the late twentieth century notes the ferment that took place in 1967 and 1968. The five groups meeting in Chicago in May 1968 had, for instance, flowered from what had been a single Chicago group just a year before. By the time of the conference in 1968, activists who used the term “women’s liberation” understood themselves to be building a movement. Embedded in national networks of student, civil rights, and antiwar movements, these activists were aware that sister women’s liber- ation groups were rapidly forming across the country. Yet despite some 1. Sarah Boyte (now Sara M. Evans, the author of this article), “from Chicago,” Voice of the Women’s Liberation Movement, June 1968, p. 7. I am grateful to Elizabeth Faue for serendipitously sending this document from the first newsletter of the women’s liberation movement created by Jo Freeman. 138 Feminist Studies 41, no. 1. © 2015 by Feminist Studies, Inc. Sara M. Evans 139 early work, including my own, the particular formation calling itself the women’s liberation movement has not been the focus of most scholar- ship on late twentieth-century feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1968 Feminists Targeted the Miss America Pageant for Protest. They
    People & Events: The 1968 Protest In 1968 feminists targeted the Miss America Pageant for protest. They staged a theatrical demonstration outside of the Atlantic City Convention Center on the day of the pageant. The protest was one of the first media events to bring national attention to the emerging Women's Liberation Movement. Over the next decade, the women's movement would rival the civil rights movement in the success it would achieve in a short period of time. 1968 was a year of great upheaval in the United States. It was a year of shocking events, including the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy. The country also was in the midst of the Vietnam War , which caused great internal division in the country. The violent antiwar demonstrations at the Chicago Democratic National Convention that year offered evidence of how divided the country was. The pageant protest was organized by the New York Radical Women (N.Y.R.W.), a group of women who had been active in the civil rights, the New Left, and the antiwar movements. Their experiences in those movements had offered them conflicting messages. As organizers and civil rights activists they were dedicated to working for freedom, yet these organizations were also plagued with their own sexism towards women. Women volunteers, for example, who came to work in the South during the Freedom Summer voter registration project in 1964, were automatically expected to cook and clean in the houses where volunteers lived. Among the first groups to press for a separate women's rights movement was the N.Y.R.W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements
    The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements By Laura K. Nelson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kim Voss, Chair Professor Raka Ray Professor Robin Einhorn Fall 2014 Copyright 2014 by Laura K. Nelson 1 Abstract The Power of Place: Structure, Culture, and Continuities in U.S. Women's Movements by Laura K. Nelson Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Kim Voss, Chair This dissertation challenges the widely accepted historical accounts of women's movements in the United States. Second-wave feminism, claim historians, was unique because of its development of radical feminism, defined by its insistence on changing consciousness, its focus on women being oppressed as a sex-class, and its efforts to emphasize the political nature of personal problems. I show that these features of second-wave radical feminism were not in fact unique but existed in almost identical forms during the first wave. Moreover, within each wave of feminism there were debates about the best way to fight women's oppression. As radical feminists were arguing that men as a sex-class oppress women as a sex-class, other feminists were claiming that the social system, not men, is to blame. This debate existed in both the first and second waves. Importantly, in both the first and the second wave there was a geographical dimension to these debates: women and organizations in Chicago argued that the social system was to blame while women and organizations in New York City argued that men were to blame.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did the 1968 Miss America Pageant Protests
    1 Kylie Garrett Dr. Hyde HIST 1493 7 November 2018 Topic statement: How did the 1968 Miss America Pageant protests exemplify the values of women during this time period, and how did the feminist movement affect other civil rights movements at the time? Protesting Miss America “The 4-H club county fair, [a place] where the nervous animals are judged for teeth, fleece, etc., and where the best ‘specimen’ gets the blue ribbon.”1 This was the metaphor published in the New York Free Press by the Women’s Liberation Movement describing the ​ ​ Miss America Pageant in 1968. The Miss America protests were used by women as a way to gain acceptance and support for women’s equality. The women of the Women’s Liberation Movement felt that the Miss America Pageant was sexist, racist, and held women to an unrealistic beauty standard. National media coverage allowed women to exemplify their values of equality, opportunity, and natural beauty, and launched the beginning of the feminist movement we know today. Because of the success women attained during this time period, other civil rights movements were encouraged to continue their fight and achieve a success of their own. The Miss America Pageant was created as a way to reflect the gradual successes women were having in the United States by expanding both their political and social rights. In Atlantic 1 Women’s Liberation, “No More Miss America,” New York Free Press, September 5, 1968. ​ ​ ​ 2 City in 1921, several businessmen put on an event titled “Fall Frolic” in order to lure vacationers into their area and increase their personal revenue.2 This pageant-like show demonstrated women’s “professional beauties, civic beauties and inter-city beauties,” and became a huge success as the event grew larger and more popular each year.3 The newspapers and media at the time portrayed these new pageants as popularity contests and began to enter in contestants of their own in order to increase awareness and popularity for their personal benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Divisions and Conflict in the Women's Liberation Movement from 1965 To
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2018 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2018 Divisions and Conflict in the omenW ’s Liberation Movement From 1965 to 1970 Devin Rose DeFlora Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018 Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation DeFlora, Devin Rose, "Divisions and Conflict in the omenW ’s Liberation Movement From 1965 to 1970" (2018). Senior Projects Spring 2018. 301. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2018/301 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! ! ! ! ! Divisions and Conflict in the Women’s Liberation Movement From 1965 to 1970 Senior Project submitted to The Division of Interdivisional Studies of Bard College by Devin Rose DeFlora Annandale-on-Hudson, New York May 2018 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dedicated to Kelli and Thomas DeFlora, who have been founts of encouragement throughout
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the US's Anti-Vietnam War Movement
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 13 Issue 6 New Writings in Feminist and Women’s Studies: Winning and Short-listed Entries from the Article 3 2011 Feminist and Women’s Studies Association UK & Ireland (FWSA) Annual Student Essay Competition Dec-2012 Understanding Antiwar Activism as a Gendering Activity: A Look at the U.S.’s Anti-Vietnam War Movement Say Burgin Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Burgin, Say (2012). Understanding Antiwar Activism as a Gendering Activity: A Look at the U.S.’s Anti-Vietnam War Movement. Journal of International Women's Studies, 13(6), 18-31. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol13/iss6/3 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2012 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Understanding antiwar activism as a gendering activity: A look at the U.S.’s anti-Vietnam War movement By Say Burgin1 Abstract Research into the gendered nature of war experiences has provided rich ways of understanding how gender constructs society and the nation. Scholarship on peace activism and gender has deepened our knowledge of women’s roles within warring societies and the ways women have understood themselves as promoters of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • SHULAMITH FIRESTONE Maureen Nappi
    SHULAMITH FIRESTONE Maureen Nappi SHULAMITH FIRESTONE: CYBERNETICS AND BACK TO A FEMINIST FUTURE The end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of the fi rst feminist movement, not just the elimination of male “privilege” but of the sex “distinction” itself: genital differences between humans beings would no longer matter culturally.”1 —Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex If you want the truth—I know—I presume —you must look into the technology of these matters… You must ask two questions. First, what is the real nature of synthesis? And then: what is the real nature of control?2 —The Spirit of Rathenau to the Nazi elite, Thomas Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow INTRODUCTION n this essay, I want to both pay homage to the work and life of the radical feminist and fi rst cyberfeminist, Shulamith Firestone (1945-2012) Iand thematically engage with the feminist community in the ongoing polemic between sexual politics and cybernetics. Firestone instigated this polemic in her feminist manifesto The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution published in 1970. As Firestone was the fi rst to propose cybernetics as a means of liberating women from the tyranny of biological determinism, she questioned why women should alone bear the reproductive labor for the entire human species by the very defi nition of their sex. For Firestone this seemed absurd and out of balance as she sought to disentangle the seemingly inseparable essentiality of women from the “mother function.” Firestone could and did problematize the state of women’s biological entrapment within the family proper simply because she saw that the preconditions 1 Firestone, Shulamith.
    [Show full text]