OCTOBER 13 and 14 • ALBANY, NY and Experiences for You to Build Your Business
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PART I — the Budget by Functional Area
PART I THE BUDGET BY FUNCTIONAL AREA EDUCATION, LABOR AND FAMILY ASSISTANCE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS MISSION The primary responsibility for oversight and administration of the State’s artistic and cultural resources is assigned to three existing entities — the Council on the Arts, the Empire State Plaza Performing Arts Center Corporation and the New York State Theatre Institute. The 2003-04 Executive Budget proposes the establishment of the New York Institute for Cultural Education to administer a variety of statewide cultural education programs and important cultural institutions. Working together, these agencies expand access to the performing and fine arts, preserve the State’s cultural resources and promote greater public awareness of New York’s rich cultural heritage. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING The Council on the Arts is headed by a Chair and a Vice Chair and consists of 20 members nominated for 5-year terms by the Governor with confirmation by the Senate. The Council’s staff, headed by an Executive Director, is organized into an Administrative Division and a Program Division, both located in New York City. The Council has expertise in several major artistic disciplines (including dance, theater and music) and provides advisory services and financial assistance to New York’s arts community. During 2003-04, the Council on the Arts will have a workforce of 52 for the review, processing and administration of arts grants and loans to nonprofit organizations. The Empire State Plaza Performing Arts Center Corporation (the “Egg”) was established in 1979 as a public benefit corporation to administer a performing arts center in Albany that offers a diverse array of cultural and artistic programming. -
The Egg Center for the Performing Arts Albany, New York Kitty Carlisle Hart Theatre Technical Specifications
The Egg Center for the Performing Arts Albany, New York Kitty Carlisle Hart Theatre Technical Specifications 1 | Hart Theatre Tech Specs - T h e E g g DIRECTIONS DO NOT USE GPS TO GET TO THE EGG. IT WILL SEND YOU TO THE WRONG PLACE. WE DO NOT HAVE A PHYSICAL STREET ADDRESS From the South (New York City): New York State Throughway/I-87 North to exit 23/787 N. Take 787 N to exit 3. Follow signs towards the Empire State Plaza. Loading dock A will be the first turn off on your right as your enter the tunnel. From the North (Montreal): I-87 South to exit 1A/I-90 east. Take exit 6A/787 S towards Albany downtown. Take exit 3A. Follow signs to the Empire State Plaza. Loading dock A will be the first turn off on your right as your enter the tunnel. From the East (Boston): I-90 W. Take exit 6A/787 S towards Albany downtown. Take exit 3A. Follow signs to the Empire State Plaza. Loading dock A will be the first turn off on your right as your enter the tunnel. From the West (Buffalo): I-90 E to exit 24 (exiting the Throughway). Continue on I-90 E to exit 6A/787 S towards Albany downtown. Take exit 3A. Follow signs to the Empire State Plaza. Loading dock A will be the first turn off on your right as your enter the tunnel. o For non-truck vehicle parking follow signs to visitor parking. o Please contact the Production Manager if you need directions from any local hotel to The Egg’s loading dock or visitor parking. -
Then & Now: Albany, the South Mall and a Neighborhood Lost
Then & Now: Albany, the South Mall and a Neighborhood Lost City Engineer, Public Works Negatives, 1930-1949. From the Archival Collection of the Albany County Hall of Records. The Princess and “The Gut” 89-01830. Private Donor. Netherlands Royal Family Visit to Albany Photo Collection. Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands, Governor Nelson Rockefeller and Mayor Erastus Corning, September, 1959. “The South Mall will be the greatest single governmental office complex history has ever known.” – Mayor Erastus Corning 2nd In September of 1959, Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands came to Albany, New York to commemorate the 350th anniversary of Henry Hudson’s exploratory voyage on the Hudson River at the Hudson-Champlain Celebration. While giving the young royal a tour of downtown Albany, Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller felt embarrassed by the deteriorating South End neighborhood referred to by some as “The Gut,” an area of many dilapidated buildings and vacant structures. Albany Mayor Erastus Corning 2nd told the Knickerbocker News in 1979 that: “Rockefeller thought [the] buildings the Princess and those with her saw were not as good-looking or appropriate for a capital city as he thought they should be.” In an attempt to revitalize Albany and transform it into a city outsiders would deem worthy of being New York’s capital, Rockefeller proposed the construction of a large, modern governmental complex. In order to create this lavish site he envisioned, Rockefeller seized 98.5 acres of land in Albany’s South End through eminent domain in 1962 and demolition soon began. As a result, thousands of families and business owners lost their properties and were forced to relocate. -
Sustainability Plan 2021-25 Advancing the ESG Foundational Pillar of VISION2030 03 11 28 50 63 INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE APPENDIX
Sustainability Plan 2021-25 Advancing the ESG Foundational Pillar of VISION2030 03 11 28 50 63 INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE APPENDIX 04 About this 12 Climate Change 29 Health & Safety 51 Enterprise Risk 65 2020 Sustainability Plan & GHG Emissions & Resilience Sustainability 32 Employee Report Metrics 06 Sustainability 15 Renewable Development 54 Regulatory Governance Energy & Management 66 Glossary Energy Storage 35 Diversity, Equity & Compliance 08 VISION2030 & Inclusion 18 Energy 58 Cyber & Physical 09 Materiality Reliability 37 Community Security Assessment Engagement 20 Energy 61 Supply Chain 09 ESG Focus Areas Efficiency & 42 Access & & Procurement Electrification Affordability Practices 23 Environmental 46 Economic Stewardship Development NYPA.GOV | 2 Introduction NYPA.GOV | 3 About this Sustainability Plan OVERVIEW AND SCOPE to meet the present and future The New York Power Authority’s needs of our stakeholders and (NYPA) mission is to lead the enhance long-term environmental, transition to a carbon-free, social, governance and economic economically vibrant New York performance. through customer partnerships, innovative energy solutions, and the This 2021-2025 Sustainability responsible supply of affordable, Plan serves as a road map to help clean and reliable electricity. bring this ambition to life. The Plan outlines the steps NYPA and our VISION2030, NYPA’s ten-year subsidiary, the New York State Canal strategic plan approved in Corporation (Canals), are committed December 2020, identifies five to taking to advance sustainability key strategic priorities we must act efforts across 15 material ESG focus on to realize our ambition. As a areas over 2021-2025. foundational pillar of VISION2030, ESG (Environmental, Social, PURPOSE Governance) is viewed as an This plan describes the goals and enterprise-wide effort that is critical strategies that we have identified to accomplish our mission. -
2800 Annual Report 2020 Operating Facilities New
Section 1 2800 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 OPERATING FACILITIES NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY: ST. LAWRENCE-FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT POWER PROJECT Type: Hydroelectric Location: Massena, St. Lawrence County Net Dependable Capacity: 833,000 kW* First Commercial Power: July 1958 2020 Net Generation: 7.80 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 425.52 billion kWh NIAGARA POWER PROJECT Type: Hydroelectric Location: Lewiston, Niagara County Net Dependable Capacity: 2,675,000 kW* First Commercial Power: January 1961 2020 Net Generation: 17.24 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 872.80 billion kWh BLENHEIM-GILBOA PUMPED STORAGE POWER PROJECT Type: Pumped Storage/Hydroelectric Location: North Blenheim and Gilboa, Schoharie County Net Dependable Capacity: 1,166,100 kW* First Commercial Power: July 1973 2020 Gross Generation: 0.28 billion kWh Gross Generation Through 2020: 52.55 billion kWh RICHARD M. FLYNN POWER PLANT Type: Gas/Oil Location: Holtsville, Suffolk County Net Dependable Capacity: 150,000 kW* First Commercial Power: May 1994 2020 Net Generation: 0.56 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 27.94 billion kWh FREDERICK R. CLARK ENERGY CENTER Function: Coordinates NYPA system operations Location: Marcy, Oneida County Opened: June 1980 1 Section 1 SMALL HYDRO FACILITIES Located on reservoirs and waterways around the state, these facilities include the Ashokan Project, Gregory B. Jarvis Plant, Crescent Plant and Vischer Ferry Plant Combined Net Dependable Capacity: 36,800 kW* 2020 Net Generation: 0.13 billion kWh Combined Net Generation Through 2020: Not measured SMALL CLEAN POWER PLANTS Type: Gas Location: Six New York City sites and Brentwood, Suffolk County Net Dependable Capacity: 457,000 kW* First Commercial Power: June 2001 2020 Net Generation: 0.48 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 10.75 billion kWh EUGENE W. -
VIDEOCONFERENCE February 3, 2021 – 3:00 P.M. PROPOSED
VIDEOCONFERENCE February 3, 2021 – 3:00 P.M. PROPOSED AGENDA 1. Adoption of the February 3, 2021 Proposed Meeting Agenda 2. Adoption of the October 7, 2020 Meeting Minutes 3. Fund Update 4. Awards of Fund Benefits from the Western New York Economic Development Fund – Round 27 Other Business 5. Next Meeting WESTERN NEW YORK POWER PROCEEDS ALLOCATION BOARD MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 2020 – 3:00 P.M. VIDEO CONFERENCE Table of Contents Subject Page No. Opening Remarks 3 1. Adoption of the October 7, 2020 Proposed Meeting Agenda 4 -Conflicts 2. Adoption of the June 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes 5 3. Adoption of the 2021 Meeting Schedule 6 4. Fund Update 7 5. Award of Fund Benefits from the Western New York Economic Development Fund Round 26 9 Other Business 6. Next Meeting 20 1 Minutes of the Meeting of the Western New York Power Proceeds Allocation Board held via video conference. Board Members Present: Anthony J. Colucci Ill Chair Deanna Brennen Dennis Elsenbeck Brenda McDuffie Paul Brown NYPA Staff Present: Karen Delince Vice President & Corporate Secretary Richard Smith Director, Business & Project Development Sheila Quatrocci Associate Corporate Secretary Valerie Venuti Administrative Assistant 2 Opening Remarks Chairman Colucci welcomed members of the Board, the staff of Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), and the staff of the New York Power Authority ("NYPA"). He stated that this meeting of the Board had been duly noticed as required by the Open Meetings law. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. 3 1. Adoption of the October 7, 2020 Proposed Meeting Agenda Member Brennen made a motion to adopt the October 7, 2020 meeting agenda. -
Localizing Buffalo's Renewable Energy Future
Localizing Buffalo’s Renewable Energy Future LEVERAGING OUR PAST, INVESTING IN THE PRESENT & BUILDING TOMORROW REV Submission Contents SYNOPSIS LEADING WITH INNOVATION • CONTEXT & BACKGROUND • PROJECT DESIGN • BUSINESS MODEL • INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS • CURRICULUM INTEGRATION PROJECT TEAM PROJECT IMPACT • GHG REDUCTION • REPLICABILITY • METRICS • RESILIENCY • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT VIABILITY • TIMELINE • BUDGET • OVERCOMING CHALLENGES • BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT CONCLUSION 1 New York State Renewing the Energy Vision Campus Challenge Energy to Lead Competition Proposal Submitted by: The University at Buffalo (lead) The City of Buffalo Buffalo State College Education Leadership Fellows in Sustainability Erie Community College Erie County Erie Canal Harbor Development Corporation Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus SYNOPSIS The Localizing Buffalo’s Renewable Energy Future initiative’s goal is to create 100 megawatts of new solar energy by 2020 that is manufactured in Buffalo, connected by Western New York workers, installed in our city’s urban core and University campuses, and utilized by key regional anchoring institutions including the University at Buffalo (a REV Campus Challenge member), Buffalo State College, Erie Community College, the City of Buffalo Erie County and others. This renewable energy purchase agreement is estimated to produce $125M in lower energy costs and savings, increase grid and neighborhood resiliency, create 3,300 new local jobs, infuse over $250M in new economic impact into the region, instill greater budget predictability and stability, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by over 82,298 metric tons annually.1 ____________________________ 1 100MW of Capacity = 326,988kWh x 365 days per year as per the NREL pvwatts calculator. Removing 119,350,736kWh from grid use eliminates 82,298 metric tons of carbon dioxide from the subscriber’s grid power at 100% use per the EPA—see: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas- equivalencies-calculator. -
FERC Scoping Document 2
20190920-3035 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 09/20/2019 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, DC 20426 September 20, 2019 OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS Project No. 4678-052–New York Crescent Hydroelectric Project Project No. 4679-049–New York Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project New York Power Authority Subject: Scoping Document 2 for the Crescent Hydroelectric Project, P-4678 and Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project, P-4679 To the Party Addressed: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is currently reviewing the Pre-Application Document submitted by the Power Authority of the State of New York (New York Power Authority or NYPA) for relicensing the Crescent Hydroelectric Project (Crescent Project) (FERC No. 4678), and the Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project (Vischer Ferry Project) (FERC No. 4679). The projects are located on the Mohawk River in Saratoga, Albany, and Schenectady Counties, New York. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, Commission staff intends to prepare an environmental assessment (EA), which will be used by the Commission to determine whether, and under what conditions, to issue new licenses for the projects. To support and assist our environmental review, we are beginning the public scoping process to ensure that all pertinent issues are identified and analyzed, and that the EA is thorough and balanced. Our preliminary review of the scope of environmental issues associated with the proposed relicensing of the projects was described in Scoping Document 1 (SD1), issued June 10, 2019. We requested comments on SD1, conducted an environmental site review, and held scoping meetings on July 10 and 11, 2019, to hear the views of all interested agencies and entities on the scope of issues that should be addressed in the EA. -
NYPA Letterhead
20200113-5178 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 1/13/2020 3:56:43 PM January 13, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Secretary Kimberly D. Bose Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Crescent Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 4678 Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 4679 Request for Extension of Time to File the Revised Study Plan Dear Secretary Bose: On May 3, 2019, the Power Authority of the State of New York (Power Authority), licensee of the Crescent and Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Projects, (Projects) FERC Nos. 4678 and 4679, respectively, filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD) and Notices of Intent with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to seek new licenses for the Projects. The Commission issued Scoping Document 1 (SD1) on June 10, 2019. On July 10, 2019, the Commission conducted environmental site visits to each of the Projects in conjunction with the public scoping meetings held on July 10-11, 2019 in Clifton Park, New York, where potential issues were identified by agencies, stakeholders, and the public. Subsequently, the Power Authority received comments on the PAD and the study plans, as well as requests for additional studies and additional information. The Power Authority reviewed these comments, study requests, and additional information requests and developed and filed a Proposed Study Plan (PSP) on September 23, 2019. The Power Authority held a meeting to discuss the PSP on October 23, 2019. Written comments on the PSP were submitted through December 23, 2019. In May 2019, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo convened a Reimagine the Canals Task Force (Task Force) to reimagine the canals and identify ideas/solutions that promote economic development, recreation, and resiliency. -
MWBE Utilization Plans
MWBE Utilization Plans New York State Authorities • Agriculture and New York State Horse Breeding Development • Albany County Airport Authority • Albany Port District Commission • Battery Park City Authority • Bridge Authority • Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority • Capital District Transportation Authority • Cayuga County Water & Sewer Authority • City University Construction Fund • City University of New York • CNY Regional Transportation • Development Authority of North Country • Dormitory Authority of the State • Empire Center at the Egg • Empire State Development • Energy Research and Development Authority, New York • Environmental Facilities Corporation • Erie County Fiscal Stability Authority • Erie County Medical Center • Higher Education Services Corporation • Hudson River Black River Regulating District • Hudson River Park Trust • Jacob K. Javits Convention Center • Livingston County Water & Sewer Authority • Long Island Power Authority • Metropolitan Transportation Authority • Nassau County Interim Finance Authority • Nassau Health Care Corporation • Natural Heritage Trust • New York Power Authority • New York State Thoroughbred Breeding and Development Fund • Niagara Falls Water Board • Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority • Ogdensburg Bridge and Port Authority • Olympic Regional Development Authority • Port of Oswego Authority • Regional Transit Service • Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation • Roswell Park Cancer Institute • Schenectady Metroplex Development Authority • State University Construction Fund • State University of New York Central • Syracuse Regional Airport Authority • Thruway Authority/Canal Corp • United Nations Development Corporation • Upper Mohawk Valley Water Authority • Westchester County Health Care Corporation . -
Vischer Ferry Notice of Intent
VIA Electronic Filing May 3, 2019 Secretary Kimberly D. Bose Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Re: Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 4679 Notification of Intent to File an Application for New License and Request for Designation as Non-Federal Representative Dear Secretary Bose: Pursuant to Section 15(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 808(b)(1), and Section 5.5 of the rules and regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC), 18 C.F.R. § 5.5, the Power Authority of the State of New York (d\b\a “New York Power Authority” and referred to as “the Power Authority”), licensee of the Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project (referred to herein as the Vischer Ferry Project), FERC No. 4679, encloses for filing the attached Notification of Intent (NOI) to File an Application for a New License. The current license for the Vischer Ferry Project expires on May 31, 2024. Concurrently with this filing, the Power Authority is also filing a Pre-Application Document (PAD) for the relicensing of the Vischer Ferry Project. In accordance with Section 5.5(e) of the Commission’s regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 5.5(e), the Power Authority requests to be designated as the Commission’s non-federal representative in relicensing the Vischer Ferry Project for purposes of consultation under: (1) Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1536, and the joint agency ESA implementing regulations at 50 C.F.R. Part 402; and (2) Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 54 U.S.C. -
Community Impact on Post 9/11 Urban Planning of Lower
COMMUNITY IMPACT ON POST 9/11 URBAN PLANNING OF LOWER MANHATwin TowersAN: FORM FOLLOWS VALUES by LAURA JANINE HOFFMAN (Under the Direction of HANK METHVIN) ABSTRACT Community response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center Twin Towers was immediate, and had indelible impact on subsequent urban planning in Lower Manhattan. Community and civic groups formed to do grassroots research and design in an inclusive and transparent process. Individuals’ hopes for the rebuilding of their city were collected through citywide workshops, town meetings, public forums, and websites. The resulting vision is a comprehensive and integrated view of urban infrastructure and human needs. It is a reflection of current cultural values, and necessitated a change in the guiding principles for rebuilding Lower Manhattan. The clarity and consistency of the community’s themes is uncanny, and was foreshadowed by post-modern urbanists: 1.Remembrance / memorial 2. Human capital/ jobs, job training, education 3. Affordable housing 4.Hubs and sub centers with links 5. Design Excellence 6. Sustainable: buildings, pedestrian friendly, transportation 7. mass transit improvements 8. Community = 24/7; connect neighborhoods; use waterfront and open spaces 9. Cultural diversity; institutions and incubator spaces INDEX WORDS: World Trade Center, Twin Towers, Manhattan, Lower Manhattan, September 11, 2001, 911, 9/11, community, values, principles, urban planning, post-modern urbanism, sustainable, 24/7, mixed use, pedestrian-friendly, cultural