February 4, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian -
Community Redevelopment Vision Former Beech-Nut Facility, Village of Canajoharie, Ny March 2018
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT VISION FORMER BEECH-NUT FACILITY, VILLAGE OF CANAJOHARIE, NY MARCH 2018 INTRODUCTION Site facts The former Beech-Nut facility sits in the heart of the Village of • 27 acres, 35 structures Canajoharie, a quaint town on the Mohawk River in New York. • Downtown Canajoharie, NY Imperial Packing Company started operations on the site in 1891. Imperial grew the business selling vacuum-packed hams • Access to I-90 Thruway, Route 10 and Route 5 using the adjacent Erie Canal, and the founders invested in the • Former food production facility Village as the industry grew. The facilities expanded rapidly • Located adjacent to the Mohawk River when Beech-Nut began producing a growing number of food products including chewing gum, coffee, baby food and more. For decades, Beech-Nut’s thriving operations provided jobs, community support, significant tax revenue and a sense of identity for the Village. Since the former Beech-Nut facility closed in 2010, the property has remained inactive and many of the 35 vacant buildings have fallen into disrepair. The Village and Montgomery County foreclosed on the property in 2017, creating the opportunity to begin visioning and planning for redevelopment of the iconic site encompassing 27 acres. During 2017, the EPA Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) provided reuse planning assistance to engage the community in developing a redevelopment vision for the site. The SRI team has worked with Montgomery County Erie Canal and Beech-Nut factory ca. early 1900’s. and the Village of Canajoharie to facilitate reuse discussions with local stakeholders including the Village of Canajoharie administrators, the Exit 29 Task Force, the Montgomery County Executive office, and local business owners. -
Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements. -
Sustainability Plan 2021-25 Advancing the ESG Foundational Pillar of VISION2030 03 11 28 50 63 INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE APPENDIX
Sustainability Plan 2021-25 Advancing the ESG Foundational Pillar of VISION2030 03 11 28 50 63 INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE APPENDIX 04 About this 12 Climate Change 29 Health & Safety 51 Enterprise Risk 65 2020 Sustainability Plan & GHG Emissions & Resilience Sustainability 32 Employee Report Metrics 06 Sustainability 15 Renewable Development 54 Regulatory Governance Energy & Management 66 Glossary Energy Storage 35 Diversity, Equity & Compliance 08 VISION2030 & Inclusion 18 Energy 58 Cyber & Physical 09 Materiality Reliability 37 Community Security Assessment Engagement 20 Energy 61 Supply Chain 09 ESG Focus Areas Efficiency & 42 Access & & Procurement Electrification Affordability Practices 23 Environmental 46 Economic Stewardship Development NYPA.GOV | 2 Introduction NYPA.GOV | 3 About this Sustainability Plan OVERVIEW AND SCOPE to meet the present and future The New York Power Authority’s needs of our stakeholders and (NYPA) mission is to lead the enhance long-term environmental, transition to a carbon-free, social, governance and economic economically vibrant New York performance. through customer partnerships, innovative energy solutions, and the This 2021-2025 Sustainability responsible supply of affordable, Plan serves as a road map to help clean and reliable electricity. bring this ambition to life. The Plan outlines the steps NYPA and our VISION2030, NYPA’s ten-year subsidiary, the New York State Canal strategic plan approved in Corporation (Canals), are committed December 2020, identifies five to taking to advance sustainability key strategic priorities we must act efforts across 15 material ESG focus on to realize our ambition. As a areas over 2021-2025. foundational pillar of VISION2030, ESG (Environmental, Social, PURPOSE Governance) is viewed as an This plan describes the goals and enterprise-wide effort that is critical strategies that we have identified to accomplish our mission. -
2800 Annual Report 2020 Operating Facilities New
Section 1 2800 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 OPERATING FACILITIES NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY: ST. LAWRENCE-FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT POWER PROJECT Type: Hydroelectric Location: Massena, St. Lawrence County Net Dependable Capacity: 833,000 kW* First Commercial Power: July 1958 2020 Net Generation: 7.80 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 425.52 billion kWh NIAGARA POWER PROJECT Type: Hydroelectric Location: Lewiston, Niagara County Net Dependable Capacity: 2,675,000 kW* First Commercial Power: January 1961 2020 Net Generation: 17.24 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 872.80 billion kWh BLENHEIM-GILBOA PUMPED STORAGE POWER PROJECT Type: Pumped Storage/Hydroelectric Location: North Blenheim and Gilboa, Schoharie County Net Dependable Capacity: 1,166,100 kW* First Commercial Power: July 1973 2020 Gross Generation: 0.28 billion kWh Gross Generation Through 2020: 52.55 billion kWh RICHARD M. FLYNN POWER PLANT Type: Gas/Oil Location: Holtsville, Suffolk County Net Dependable Capacity: 150,000 kW* First Commercial Power: May 1994 2020 Net Generation: 0.56 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 27.94 billion kWh FREDERICK R. CLARK ENERGY CENTER Function: Coordinates NYPA system operations Location: Marcy, Oneida County Opened: June 1980 1 Section 1 SMALL HYDRO FACILITIES Located on reservoirs and waterways around the state, these facilities include the Ashokan Project, Gregory B. Jarvis Plant, Crescent Plant and Vischer Ferry Plant Combined Net Dependable Capacity: 36,800 kW* 2020 Net Generation: 0.13 billion kWh Combined Net Generation Through 2020: Not measured SMALL CLEAN POWER PLANTS Type: Gas Location: Six New York City sites and Brentwood, Suffolk County Net Dependable Capacity: 457,000 kW* First Commercial Power: June 2001 2020 Net Generation: 0.48 billion kWh Net Generation Through 2020: 10.75 billion kWh EUGENE W. -
VIDEOCONFERENCE February 3, 2021 – 3:00 P.M. PROPOSED
VIDEOCONFERENCE February 3, 2021 – 3:00 P.M. PROPOSED AGENDA 1. Adoption of the February 3, 2021 Proposed Meeting Agenda 2. Adoption of the October 7, 2020 Meeting Minutes 3. Fund Update 4. Awards of Fund Benefits from the Western New York Economic Development Fund – Round 27 Other Business 5. Next Meeting WESTERN NEW YORK POWER PROCEEDS ALLOCATION BOARD MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 2020 – 3:00 P.M. VIDEO CONFERENCE Table of Contents Subject Page No. Opening Remarks 3 1. Adoption of the October 7, 2020 Proposed Meeting Agenda 4 -Conflicts 2. Adoption of the June 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes 5 3. Adoption of the 2021 Meeting Schedule 6 4. Fund Update 7 5. Award of Fund Benefits from the Western New York Economic Development Fund Round 26 9 Other Business 6. Next Meeting 20 1 Minutes of the Meeting of the Western New York Power Proceeds Allocation Board held via video conference. Board Members Present: Anthony J. Colucci Ill Chair Deanna Brennen Dennis Elsenbeck Brenda McDuffie Paul Brown NYPA Staff Present: Karen Delince Vice President & Corporate Secretary Richard Smith Director, Business & Project Development Sheila Quatrocci Associate Corporate Secretary Valerie Venuti Administrative Assistant 2 Opening Remarks Chairman Colucci welcomed members of the Board, the staff of Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), and the staff of the New York Power Authority ("NYPA"). He stated that this meeting of the Board had been duly noticed as required by the Open Meetings law. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. 3 1. Adoption of the October 7, 2020 Proposed Meeting Agenda Member Brennen made a motion to adopt the October 7, 2020 meeting agenda. -
Subwatershed Characterization
Chapter 3: Subwatershed Assessment 3.1 Objective of the Assessment The structure of watersheds is dendritic or tree-like with smaller streams joining progressively larger ones (see Map 2-5). Thus, the watershed as a whole can be divided into a series of nested “subwatersheds” as illustrated by the HUC-8 through HUC-12 notation. Effective management of water quality in the basin as a whole depends on recognizing this fundamental structure of the watershed, starting with smaller units and addressing restoration and protection efforts to progressively larger, more inclusive ones. The objective, therefore, is to assess water- quality issues at their source, and to set priorities for remediating degraded parts of the watershed and protecting those that are not degraded but may be in danger of becoming so without effective management. Recommendations for addressing the restoration and protections issues uncovered in this assessment are discussed in Chapter 4. 3.2 Assessment Criteria and Procedure To complete this assessment, each of the 12-digit HUC subwatersheds in the Mohawk River Watershed was evaluated using a set of quantitative indicators for three aspects of watershed health: water quality, land use, and habitat. The evaluation assigned a score of 1 to 5 for each of various quantitative indicators (metrics) of watershed health. The scores associated with these metrics of watershed health were combined to a final score; some were weighted for overall significance. The amalgamated scores can be used to help define priority areas (subwatersheds with the lowest overall scores), while preserving important information regarding the underlying causes for concern. Quantitative indicators and resulting scores for the three aspects of watershed health are described in this section. -
Localizing Buffalo's Renewable Energy Future
Localizing Buffalo’s Renewable Energy Future LEVERAGING OUR PAST, INVESTING IN THE PRESENT & BUILDING TOMORROW REV Submission Contents SYNOPSIS LEADING WITH INNOVATION • CONTEXT & BACKGROUND • PROJECT DESIGN • BUSINESS MODEL • INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS • CURRICULUM INTEGRATION PROJECT TEAM PROJECT IMPACT • GHG REDUCTION • REPLICABILITY • METRICS • RESILIENCY • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT VIABILITY • TIMELINE • BUDGET • OVERCOMING CHALLENGES • BROAD COMMUNITY SUPPORT CONCLUSION 1 New York State Renewing the Energy Vision Campus Challenge Energy to Lead Competition Proposal Submitted by: The University at Buffalo (lead) The City of Buffalo Buffalo State College Education Leadership Fellows in Sustainability Erie Community College Erie County Erie Canal Harbor Development Corporation Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus SYNOPSIS The Localizing Buffalo’s Renewable Energy Future initiative’s goal is to create 100 megawatts of new solar energy by 2020 that is manufactured in Buffalo, connected by Western New York workers, installed in our city’s urban core and University campuses, and utilized by key regional anchoring institutions including the University at Buffalo (a REV Campus Challenge member), Buffalo State College, Erie Community College, the City of Buffalo Erie County and others. This renewable energy purchase agreement is estimated to produce $125M in lower energy costs and savings, increase grid and neighborhood resiliency, create 3,300 new local jobs, infuse over $250M in new economic impact into the region, instill greater budget predictability and stability, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by over 82,298 metric tons annually.1 ____________________________ 1 100MW of Capacity = 326,988kWh x 365 days per year as per the NREL pvwatts calculator. Removing 119,350,736kWh from grid use eliminates 82,298 metric tons of carbon dioxide from the subscriber’s grid power at 100% use per the EPA—see: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas- equivalencies-calculator. -
FERC Scoping Document 2
20190920-3035 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 09/20/2019 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, DC 20426 September 20, 2019 OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS Project No. 4678-052–New York Crescent Hydroelectric Project Project No. 4679-049–New York Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project New York Power Authority Subject: Scoping Document 2 for the Crescent Hydroelectric Project, P-4678 and Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project, P-4679 To the Party Addressed: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is currently reviewing the Pre-Application Document submitted by the Power Authority of the State of New York (New York Power Authority or NYPA) for relicensing the Crescent Hydroelectric Project (Crescent Project) (FERC No. 4678), and the Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project (Vischer Ferry Project) (FERC No. 4679). The projects are located on the Mohawk River in Saratoga, Albany, and Schenectady Counties, New York. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, Commission staff intends to prepare an environmental assessment (EA), which will be used by the Commission to determine whether, and under what conditions, to issue new licenses for the projects. To support and assist our environmental review, we are beginning the public scoping process to ensure that all pertinent issues are identified and analyzed, and that the EA is thorough and balanced. Our preliminary review of the scope of environmental issues associated with the proposed relicensing of the projects was described in Scoping Document 1 (SD1), issued June 10, 2019. We requested comments on SD1, conducted an environmental site review, and held scoping meetings on July 10 and 11, 2019, to hear the views of all interested agencies and entities on the scope of issues that should be addressed in the EA. -
Streamflow Peaks of Record at US Geological Survey Streamgages
Streamflow Peaks of Record at U.S. Geological Survey Streamgages Resulting from Hurricane Irene Rainfall (All Data Is Provisional and Subject to Change without notice) Provisional data: Subsequent review may result in significant revisions to the data. Data users are cautioned to consider carefully the provisional nature of the information before using it for decisions that concern personal or public safety or the conduct of business Abbreviations: [mi2, square miles; ft3/s, cubic feet per second; R, River; HWM, High Water Mark; NR, Near; BLW, Below; L, Lake; BR, Branch; W, West; C, Creek ] Peak Number of Peak Stream‐ Years of Stream‐ Date of Station Drainage Peak flow Date of Peak Flow flow Previous Number Station Name Area (mi^2) Stage (ft) (ft^3/s) Peak Record (ft^3/s) Peak Special Remarks 01483155 SILVER LAKE TRIBUTARY AT MIDDLETOWN, DE 2.0 4.64 270 8/27/2011 10 212 7/12/2004 01483700 ST JONES RIVER AT DOVER, DE 31.9 11.72 1,900 8/28/2011 53 1,900 9/13/1960 Streamflow affected to unknown degree by Regulation or Diversion 01484100 BEAVERDAM BRANCH AT HOUSTON , DE 303.0 5575.57 300 8/28/2011 53 163 12/9/2009 01169000 NORTH RIVER AT SHATTUCKVILLE, MA 89.0 17.66 53,100 8/28/2011 71 18,800 10/9/2005 01169900 SOUTH RIVER NEAR CONWAY, MA 24.1 13.73 12,700 8/28/2011 45 8,770 10/9/2005 01170000 DEERFIELD RIVER NEAR WEST DEERFIELD, MA 557 23.77 103,000 8/28/2011 71 61,700 4/5/1987 Streamflow affected by Regulation or Diversion 01170100 GREEN RIVER NEAR COLRAIN, MA 41.4 13.31 17,500 8/28/2011 44 6,540 10/9/2005 01171500 MILL RIVER AT NORTHAMPTON, MA 52.6 16.42 7,000 8/28/2011 73 6,300 8/19/1955 01181000 WEST BRANCH WESTFIELD RIVER AT HUNTINGTON, MA 94.0 16.94 35,000 8/28/2011 76 28,000 10/9/2005 Peak from HWM. -
NYPA Letterhead
20200113-5178 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 1/13/2020 3:56:43 PM January 13, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Secretary Kimberly D. Bose Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Crescent Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 4678 Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 4679 Request for Extension of Time to File the Revised Study Plan Dear Secretary Bose: On May 3, 2019, the Power Authority of the State of New York (Power Authority), licensee of the Crescent and Vischer Ferry Hydroelectric Projects, (Projects) FERC Nos. 4678 and 4679, respectively, filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD) and Notices of Intent with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to seek new licenses for the Projects. The Commission issued Scoping Document 1 (SD1) on June 10, 2019. On July 10, 2019, the Commission conducted environmental site visits to each of the Projects in conjunction with the public scoping meetings held on July 10-11, 2019 in Clifton Park, New York, where potential issues were identified by agencies, stakeholders, and the public. Subsequently, the Power Authority received comments on the PAD and the study plans, as well as requests for additional studies and additional information. The Power Authority reviewed these comments, study requests, and additional information requests and developed and filed a Proposed Study Plan (PSP) on September 23, 2019. The Power Authority held a meeting to discuss the PSP on October 23, 2019. Written comments on the PSP were submitted through December 23, 2019. In May 2019, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo convened a Reimagine the Canals Task Force (Task Force) to reimagine the canals and identify ideas/solutions that promote economic development, recreation, and resiliency. -
Freeze-Up Ice Jams
ICE JAM REFERENCE AND TROUBLE SPOTS Ice Jam Reference Ice jams cause localized flooding and can quickly cause serious problems in the NWS Albany Hydrologic Service Area (HSA). Rapid rises behind the jams can lead to temporary lakes and flooding of homes and roads along rivers. A sudden release of a jam can lead to flash flooding below with the addition of large pieces of ice in the wall of water which will damage or destroy most things in its path. Ice jams are of two forms: Freeze up and Break up. Freeze up jams usually occur early to mid winter during extremely cold weather. Break up jams usually occur mid to late winter with thaws. NWS Albany Freeze Up Jam Criteria: Three Consecutive Days with daily average temperatures <= 0°F NWS Albany Break Up Jam Criteria: 1) Ice around 1 foot thick or more? And 2) Daily Average Temperature forecast to be >= 42°F or more? Daily Average Temperature = (Tmax+Tmin)/2 Rainfall/snowmelt with a thaw will enhance the potential for break up jams as rising water helps to lift and break up the ice. A very short thaw with little or no rain/snowmelt may not be enough to break up thick ice. ** River forecasts found at: http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/forecasts.php?wfo=aly will not take into account the effect of ice. ** Ice jams usually form in preferred locations in the NWS Albany HSA. See the “Ice Jam Trouble Spots” below for a list of locations where ice jams frequently occur. Ice Jam Trouble Spots **This is not an all inclusive list, but rather a list of locations where ice jams have been reported in the past.