DOCSLIB.ORG

Streamflow Peaks of Record at US Geological Survey Streamgages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Streamflow Peaks of Record at US Geological Survey Streamgages Streamflow Peaks of Record at U.S. Geological Survey Streamgages Resulting from Hurricane Irene Rainfall (All Data Is Provisional and Subject to Change without notice) Provisional data: Subsequent review may result in significant revisions to the data. Data users are cautioned to consider carefully the provisional nature of the information before using it for decisions that concern personal or public safety or the conduct of business Abbreviations: [mi2, square miles; ft3/s, cubic feet per second; R, River; HWM, High Water Mark; NR, Near; BLW, Below; L, Lake; BR, Branch; W, West; C, Creek ] Peak Number of Peak Stream‐ Years of Stream‐ Date of Station Drainage Peak flow Date of Peak Flow flow Previous Number Station Name Area (mi^2) Stage (ft) (ft^3/s) Peak Record (ft^3/s) Peak Special Remarks 01483155 SILVER LAKE TRIBUTARY AT MIDDLETOWN, DE 2.0 4.64 270 8/27/2011 10 212 7/12/2004 01483700 ST JONES RIVER AT DOVER, DE 31.9 11.72 1,900 8/28/2011 53 1,900 9/13/1960 Streamflow affected to unknown degree by Regulation or Diversion 01484100 BEAVERDAM BRANCH AT HOUSTON , DE 303.0 5575.57 300 8/28/2011 53 163 12/9/2009 01169000 NORTH RIVER AT SHATTUCKVILLE, MA 89.0 17.66 53,100 8/28/2011 71 18,800 10/9/2005 01169900 SOUTH RIVER NEAR CONWAY, MA 24.1 13.73 12,700 8/28/2011 45 8,770 10/9/2005 01170000 DEERFIELD RIVER NEAR WEST DEERFIELD, MA 557 23.77 103,000 8/28/2011 71 61,700 4/5/1987 Streamflow affected by Regulation or Diversion 01170100 GREEN RIVER NEAR COLRAIN, MA 41.4 13.31 17,500 8/28/2011 44 6,540 10/9/2005 01171500 MILL RIVER AT NORTHAMPTON, MA 52.6 16.42 7,000 8/28/2011 73 6,300 8/19/1955 01181000 WEST BRANCH WESTFIELD RIVER AT HUNTINGTON, MA 94.0 16.94 35,000 8/28/2011 76 28,000 10/9/2005 Peak from HWM. 01198000 GREEN RIVER NEAR GREAT BARRINGTON, MA 51.0 12.38 7,450 8/28/2011 26 6,740 7/13/1996 01198125 HOUSATONIC RIVER NEAR ASHLEY FALLS, MA 465 17.33 9,110 8/30/2011 6 8,060 12/13/2008 This peak streamflow was exceeded during Tropical Storm Lee in September. 01491000 CHOPTANK RIVER NEAR GREENSBORO, MD 113 10.34 9,000 8/28/2011 63 6,970 8/4/1967 01491500 TUCKAHOE CREEK NEAR RUTHSBURG, MD 85.2 9.73 7,500 8/28/2011 16 3,390 4/16/2007 01494150 THREE BRIDGES BRANCH AT CENTREVILLE, MD 9.5 7.4 1,100 8/28/2011 4 519 4/15/2007 01580700 SWAN CREEK AT SWAN CREEK, MD 13.2 8.74 2,000 8/28/2011 3 1,120 12/9/2009 01581649 JAMES RUN NEAR BELCAMP , MD 929.2 7397.39 2, 500 8/28/2011 6 2, 240 9/11/2009 01661050 ST CLEMENT CREEK NEAR CLEMENTS, MD 18.5 7.15 8,100 8/28/2011 41 4,500 9/6/1979 01054200 WILD RIVER AT GILEAD, ME 69.6 17.42 37,800 8/28/2011 48 28,300 10/24/1959 01064500 SACO RIVER NR CONWAY, NH 385 17.23 56,000 8/28/2011 89 47,300 3/27/1953 01074520 EB PEMIGEWASSET R @ LINCOLN, NH 115 17.35 28,100 8/28/2011 17 16,900 4/14/2002 01075000 PEMIGEWASSET R AT WOODSTOCK, NH 193 16.53 48,200 8/28/2011 65 47,000 10/24/1959 Above flood stage 01077400 COCKERMOUTH RIVER AT GROTON, NH 21.4 11.19 5,600 8/28/2011 1 1,500 12/12/2008 01154500 CONNECTICUT R AT NORTH WALPOLE, NH 5,493 31.36 98,000 8/29/2011 69 97,000 3/27/1953 Streamflow affected by Regulation or Diversion 01367800 PAPAKATING CREEK AT PELLETTOWN, NJ 15.8 10.00 2,750 8/28/2011 8 1,210 4/16/2007 01377000 HACKENSACK RIVER AT RIVERVALE, NJ 58.0 12.26 4,660 8/28/2011 69 4,620 4/16/2007 Streamflow affected to unknown degree by Regulation or Diversion 01379000 PASSAIC RIVER NEAR MILLINGTON, NJ 55.4 10.26 2,610 8/29/2011 92 2,290 10/20/1996 01379773 GREEN POND BROOK AT PICATINNY ARSENAL, NJ 7.7 3.84 455 8/28/2011 24 333 4/5/1984 01380500 ROCKAWAY RIVER ABOVE RESERVOIR AT BOONTON, NJ 116 9.31 9,160 8/28/2011 74 5,590 4/5/1984 01381400 WHIPPANY RIVER NEAR MORRISTOWN, NJ 14.0 10.42 4,920 8/28/2011 15 2,950 10/20/1996 01381500 WHIPPANY RIVER AT MORRISTOWN, NJ 29.4 9.58 2,960 8/28/2011 89 2,800 9/28/1971 01381800 WHIPPANY R NR PINE BROOK, NJ 68.5 10.76 5,910 8/28/2011 20 2,080 10/20/1996 01381900 PASSAIC RIVER AT PINE BROOK, NJ 349 24.12 9,750 8/30/2011 46 8,000 4/7/1984 01382800 PEQUANNOCK RIVER AT RIVERDALE, NJ 83.9 13.99 8/28/2011 7 8,000 4/5/1984 01383500 WANAQUE RIVER AT AWOSTING, NJ 27.1 7.00 3,300 8/28/2011 92 2,800 4/5/1984 01384500 RINGWOOD CREEK NEAR WANAQUE, NJ 19.1 14.02 2,470 8/28/2011 68 2,300 9/16/1999 01387500 RAMAPO RIVER NEAR MAHWAH, NJ 120 15.77 17,600 8/28/2011 89 15,500 4/5/1984 01388000 RAMAPO RIVER AT POMPTON LAKES, NJ 160 22.62 8/28/2011 90 15,400 4/5/1984 Provisional data: Subsequent review may result in significant revisions to the data. Data users are cautioned to consider carefully the provisional nature of the information before using it for decisions that concern personal or public safety or the conduct of business Abbreviations: [mi2, square miles; ft3/s, cubic feet per second; R, River; HWM, High Water Mark; NR, Near; BLW, Below; L, Lake; BR, Branch; W, West; C, Creek ] Peak Number of Peak Stream‐ Years of Stream‐ Date of Station Drainage Peak flow Date of Peak Flow flow Previous Number Station Name Area (mi^2) Stage (ft) (ft^3/s) Peak Record (ft^3/s) Peak Special Remarks 01389550 PECKMAN RIVER AT LITTLE FALLS, NJ 7.8 9.08 8/28/2011 5 1,280 9/6/2008 01391500 SADDLE RIVER AT LODI, NJ 24.0 13.50 5,740 8/28/2011 87 5,330 9/17/1999 01393450 ELIZABETH R AT URSINO LAKE AT ELIZABETH, NJ 16.9 22.51 6,020 8/28/2011 89 4,510 9/16/1999 01394500 RAHWAY R NR SPRINGFIELD, NJ 25.5 10.88 8,620 8/28/2011 73 7,990 9/16/1999 01395000 RAHWAY RIVER AT RAHWAY, NJ 40.9 12.10 8/28/2011 89 5,590 9/17/1999 01396190 SB RARITAN RIVER AT FOUR BRIDGES, NJ 31.0 12.16 8/28/2011 12 3,000 9/16/1999 01396500 SOUTH BRANCH RARITAN RIVER NEAR HIGH BRIDGE, NJ 65.3 12.92 9,440 8/28/2011 95 6,910 1/25/1979 0014000001400000 NNORTHORTH BRANCHBRANCH RARITAN RIVER NEAR RARITANRARITAN,, NNJJ 119090 17.17.9797440,6000,600 8/8/28/201128/2011 88 229,1009,100 110/19/19960/19/1996 01401000 STONY BROOK AT PRINCETON, NJ 44.5 16.23 11,100 8/28/2011 57 8,960 8/28/1971 01402000 MILLSTONE RIVER AT BLACKWELLS MILLS, NJ 258 21.24 26,800 8/28/2011 90 26,200 9/17/1999 01403150 WEST BRANCH MIDDLE BROOK NEAR MARTINSVILLE, NJ 2.0 9.35 1,530 8/28/2011 31 1,490 9/16/1999 01403900 BOUND BK AT MIDDLESEX, NJ 48.4 13.99 8,780 8/28/2011 25 7,840 9/17/1999 01405030 LAWRENCE BK AT WESTONS MILLS, NJ 44.9 20.26 6,550 8/28/2011 22 4,850 9/21/1989 01405400 MANALAPAN BROOK AT SPOTSWOOD, NJ 40.7 21.84 8/28/2011 54 2,550 9/20/1989 01408000 MANASQUAN RIVER AT SQUANKUM, NJ 44.0 13.06 8,480 8/28/2011 79 2,940 9/21/1938 01408029 MANASQUAN R NR ALLENWOOD, NJ 63.3 20.38 12,400 8/28/2011 42 3,880 10/14/2005 01408120 NORTH BRANCH METEDECONK RIVER NEAR LAKEWOOD, NJ 34.9 11.40 8/28/2011 38 1,370 11/8/1977 01408500 TOMS RIVER NEAR TOMS RIVER, NJ 123 13.62 3,740 8/28/2011 82 2,000 9/23/1938 01409810 WEST BRANCH WADING RIVER NEAR JENKINS, NJ 84.1 16.16 1,780 8/28/2011 28 1,320 2/26/1979 01411456 LITTLE EASE RN NR CLAYTON, NJ 9.8 6.70 8/28/2011 24 414 8/14/2011 01440000 FLAT BROOK NEAR FLATBROOKVILLE, NJ 64.0 12.94 8/28/2011 88 9,560 8/19/1955 01443280 EAST BRANCH PAULINS KILL NEAR LAYFAYETTE, NJ 13.0 6.63 592 8/28/2011 18 376 4/16/2007 01445000 PEQUEST RIVER AT HUNTSVILLE, NJ 31.0 6.01 8/29/2011 31 906 1/25/1979 This ppgppeak streamflow was exceeded during Tropical Storm Lee in September. 01457000 MUSCONETCONG RIVER NEAR BLOOMSBURY, NJ 141 8.75 8,230 8/28/2011 94 7,200 1/25/1979 01464000 ASSUNPINK CREEK AT TRENTON, NJ 90.6 15.12 8/28/2011 88 5,450 7/21/1975 01464500 CROSSWICKS CREEK AT EXTONVILLE, NJ 81.5 17.32 7,140 8/28/2011 72 4,860 9/1/1978 01466500 MCDONALDS BRANCH IN BYRNE STATE FOREST, NJ 2.4 2.54 43 8/28/2011 58 38 7/13/2004 01466900 GREENWOOD BRANCH AT NEW LISBON, NJ 77.9 9.87 8/29/2011 14 1,080 7/13/2004 01467000 NORTH BRANCH RANCOCAS CREEK AT PEMBERTON, NJ 118 4.91 2,410 8/29/2011 90 2,050 7/14/2004 01477120 RACCOON CREEK NEAR SWEDESBORO, NJ 26.9 18.68 5,580 8/28/2011 45 3,530 8/10/1967 01303500 COLD SPRING BROOK AT COLD SPRING HARBOR, NY 7.3 3.76 183 8/28/2011 57 181 1/21/1979 01329490 BATTEN KILL BELOW MILL AT BATTENVILLE, NY 396 14.27 22900 8/29/2011 7 8,300 3/9/2008 01349150 CANAJOHARIE CREEK NR CANAJOHARIE, NY 59.7 10.76 5850 8/28/2011 18 5,510 6/28/2006 01349705 SCHOHARIE CREEK NEAR LEXINGTON, NY 96.8 22.87 34100 8/28/2011 12 23,000 9/16/1999 01349711 WEST KILL BELOW HUNTER BROOK NEAR SPRUCETON, NY 5.0 5.23 4320 8/28/2011 13 2,080 9/16/1999 01349810 WEST KILL NEAR WEST KILL, NY 27.0 14.03 9230 8/28/2011 14 6,500 1/19/1996 01350035 BEAR KILL NEAR PRATTSVILLE, NY 25.7 8.11 2620 8/28/2011 12 2,580 9/18/2004 01350080 MANOR KILL AT WEST CONESVILLE NEAR GILBOA , NY 32.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • NENHC 2008 Abstracts
    Abstracts APRIL 17 – APRIL 18, 2008 A FORUM FOR CURRENT RESEARCH The Northeastern Naturalist The New York State Museum is a program of The University of the State of New York/The State Education Department APRIL 17 – APRIL 18, 2008 A FORUM FOR CURRENT RESEARCH SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR CITING ABSTRACTS: Abstracts Northeast Natural History Conference X. N.Y. State Mus. Circ. 71: page number(s). 2008. ISBN: 1-55557-246-4 The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ALBANY, NY 12230 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. ................................................................. Tonawanda MERRYL H. TISCH, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................. New York SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.................................................................................. New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. .................................................................. Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. ..................................................................................... Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................................... Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. .................................................................................. Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ............................................................................. Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN, JR., B.A.,
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge At the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge, we conserve the biological diversity of the Wallkill Valley by protecting and managing land, with a special emphasis on s% i 7 7 7* 7 migrating wate / fo wl, wintering raptors, and endangered species, while providing \ opportunities for scientific research J *tind compatible I public use. ' Our Mission Congress established the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge in 1990 "to preserve and enhance refuge lands and waters in a manner that will conserve the natural diversity of fish, wildlife, plants, This blue goose, and their habitats for present and designed by J.N. future generations and to provide "Ding" Darling, opportunities for compatible has become the scientific research, environmental symbol of the education, and fish and wildlife- National Wildlife oriented recreation." Congress Refuge System. /. also required the protection of •/. aquatic habitats within the refuge, •- including the Wallkill River and '53 Papakating Creek. - The individual purposes of this Wallkill River refuge are supported by the mission in fall The refuge is located along a nine-mile of the National Wildlife Refuge stretch of the Wallkill River, and lies in System, of which the Wallkill River a rolling valley within the Appalachian refuge is a part. That mission is Ridge and Valley physiographic "to administer a national network province. The Wallkill Valley is of lands and waters for the bounded by the Kittatinny Ridge to conservation, management, and the west and the New York/New where appropriate, restoration of Jersey Highlands to the east. This the fish, wildlife, and plant resources area is part of the Great Valley, which and their habitats within the United extends from Canada to the southern States for the benefit of present and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex County Open Space and Recreation Plan.”
    OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN for the County of Sussex “People and Nature Together” Compiled by Morris Land Conservancy with the Sussex County Open Space Committee September 30, 2003 County of Sussex Open Space and Recreation Plan produced by Morris Land Conservancy’s Partners for Greener Communities team: David Epstein, Executive Director Laura Szwak, Assistant Director Barbara Heskins Davis, Director of Municipal Programs Robert Sheffield, Planning Manager Tanya Nolte, Mapping Manager Sandy Urgo, Land Preservation Specialist Anne Bowman, Land Acquisition Administrator Holly Szoke, Communications Manager Letty Lisk, Office Manager Student Interns: Melissa Haupt Brian Henderson Brian Licinski Ken Sicknick Erin Siek Andrew Szwak Dolce Vieira OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN for County of Sussex “People and Nature Together” Compiled by: Morris Land Conservancy a nonprofit land trust with the County of Sussex Open Space Advisory Committee September 2003 County of Sussex Board of Chosen Freeholders Harold J. Wirths, Director Joann D’Angeli, Deputy Director Gary R. Chiusano, Member Glen Vetrano, Member Susan M. Zellman, Member County of Sussex Open Space Advisory Committee Austin Carew, Chairperson Glen Vetrano, Freeholder Liaison Ray Bonker Louis Cherepy Libby Herland William Hookway Tom Meyer Barbara Rosko Eric Snyder Donna Traylor Acknowledgements Morris Land Conservancy would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their help in providing information, guidance, research and mapping materials for the County of
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Northwest Water Region
    Amendment to the Sussex County Water Quality Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Northwest Water Region Watershed Management Area 2 (Wallkill River, and Pochuck, Papakating, Rutgers Creeks Watersheds) Proposed: July 19, 2004 Established: September 23, 2004 Approved (by EPA Region 2): September 29, 2004 Adopted: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Bureau of Environmental Analysis and Restoration P.O. Box 418 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0418 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 4 2.0 Introduction 6 3.0 Background 6 4.0 Pollutant of Concern and Area of Interest 9 5.0 Applicable Surface Water Quality Standards 16 6.0 Water Quality Data and Source Assessment 17 7.0 TMDL Calculations 24 8.0 Implementation Plan 26 9.0 Follow-up Monitoring 29 10.0 Reasonable Assurance 29 11.0 Public Participation 30 Tables Table 1. Locations of Wallkill River and Papakating Creek TMDLs 4 Table 2. Arsenic impaired stream segments in the Wallkill River And Papakating Creek Watersheds 8 Table 3. Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Watersheds 1995-97 Land Use/Land Cover (by HUC 14) Total Area = acre 14 Table 4. Water Quality Monitoring Sites and Data Supporting Arsenic TMDLs 18 Table 5. Treatment works that Discharge to Surface Waters in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Watersheds 19 Table 6. Wasteload and Load reductions with a 5 percent margin of safety 25 Figures Figure 1. Locations of Impaired Monitoring Stations for the Wallkill River Watershed and Papakating Creek Watersheds 5 Figure 2a.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This Blue Goose, Designed by J.N
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fi sh, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service manages the 97-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 548 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 69 national fi sh hatcheries and 81 ecological services fi eld stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally signifi cant fi sheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fi shing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffi ng increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 Submitted by: Edward Henry Date Refuge Manager Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Concurrence by: Janet M.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Redevelopment Vision Former Beech-Nut Facility, Village of Canajoharie, Ny March 2018
    COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT VISION FORMER BEECH-NUT FACILITY, VILLAGE OF CANAJOHARIE, NY MARCH 2018 INTRODUCTION Site facts The former Beech-Nut facility sits in the heart of the Village of • 27 acres, 35 structures Canajoharie, a quaint town on the Mohawk River in New York. • Downtown Canajoharie, NY Imperial Packing Company started operations on the site in 1891. Imperial grew the business selling vacuum-packed hams • Access to I-90 Thruway, Route 10 and Route 5 using the adjacent Erie Canal, and the founders invested in the • Former food production facility Village as the industry grew. The facilities expanded rapidly • Located adjacent to the Mohawk River when Beech-Nut began producing a growing number of food products including chewing gum, coffee, baby food and more. For decades, Beech-Nut’s thriving operations provided jobs, community support, significant tax revenue and a sense of identity for the Village. Since the former Beech-Nut facility closed in 2010, the property has remained inactive and many of the 35 vacant buildings have fallen into disrepair. The Village and Montgomery County foreclosed on the property in 2017, creating the opportunity to begin visioning and planning for redevelopment of the iconic site encompassing 27 acres. During 2017, the EPA Superfund Redevelopment Initiative (SRI) provided reuse planning assistance to engage the community in developing a redevelopment vision for the site. The SRI team has worked with Montgomery County Erie Canal and Beech-Nut factory ca. early 1900’s. and the Village of Canajoharie to facilitate reuse discussions with local stakeholders including the Village of Canajoharie administrators, the Exit 29 Task Force, the Montgomery County Executive office, and local business owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of the Wallkill River Watershed
    wallkill river watershed alliance we fight dirty A Bibliography of the Wallkill River Watershed Many of the documents listed below will eventually be found in the documents section of the Wallkill River Watershed Alliance’s website at www.wallkillalliance.org/files Amendment to the Sussex County Water Quality Management Plan, Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek, Northwest Water Region. (2004). New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management, Bureau of Environmental Analysis and Restoration. Barbour, J., G. (undated manuscript). Ecological issues of Glenmere Lake, Town of Warwick, New York. Barringer, J. L., Bonin, J. L., Deluca, M. J., Romagna, T., Cenno, K., Marzo, A., Kratzer, T., Hirst, B. (2007). Sources and temporal dynamics of arsenic in a New Jersey watershed, USA. Science of the Total Environment, 379, 56-74. Barringer, J. L., Wilson, T. P., Szabo, Z., Bonin, J. L., Fischer, J. M., Smith, N. P., (2008). Diurnal variations in, and influences on, concentrations of particulate and dissolved arsenic and metals in the mildly alkaline Wallkill River, New Jersey, USA. Environmental Geology, 53, 1183-1199. Bugliosi, E. F., Casey, G. D., Ramelot, D. (1998). Geohydrology and water quality of the Wallkill River valley near Middletown, New York. United States Geological Survey, Open File Report 97-241. Dwaar Kill, Lower and Tribs Fact Sheet. (2007). Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water. Dwaar Kill, and Tribs Fact Sheet. (2007). Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan Update North Salem Comprehensive Plan
    NORTH SALEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE NORTH SALEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Prepared by: Town of North Salem Delancey Hall, Town Hall 266 Titicus Road North Salem, New York 10560 Adopted December 20, 2011 FERRANDINO & ASSOCIATES INC. DRAFT JAN NORTH SALEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Acknowledgments Town Board Warren Lucas, Supervisor Peter Kamenstein, Deputy Supervisor Stephen Bobolia, Councilman Mary Elizabeth Reeve, Councilwoman Amy Rosmarin, Councilwoman Comprehensive Planning Committee John White, Chair Janice Will, Secretary Martin Aronchick, Member Katherine Daniels, Member Linda Farina, Member Charlotte Harris, Member Robert Kotch, Member Michelle La Mothe, Member Drew Outhouse, Member Pam Pooley, Member Alan Towers, Member Peter Wiederhorn, Member Planning Consultant Ferrandino & Associates Inc. Planning and Development Consultants Three West Main Street, Suite 214 Elmsford, New York 10523 Vince Ferrandino, AICP, Principal-in-Charge Teresa Bergey, AICP, Senior Planner/Project Manager Kruti Bhatia, AICP, Planner Evan Smith, Planner In concert with Fitzgerald & Halliday Inc., for Transportation Mary Manning, P.E., Project Manager FERRANDINO & ASSOCIATES INC. DECEMBER 2011 NORTH SALEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Planning Board Cynthia Curtis, Chair Recreation Committee Dawn Onufrik, Secretary John Varachi, Chair Charlotte Harris, Member/ CPC Liaison Norma Bandak, Member Gary Jacobi, Member Andrew Brown, Member Bernard Sweeny, Member Brendan Curran, Member Robert Tompkins, Member Allison Hublard-Hershman, Member Della Mancuso, Member Zoning Board of Appeals
    [Show full text]
  • Subwatershed Characterization
    Chapter 3: Subwatershed Assessment 3.1 Objective of the Assessment The structure of watersheds is dendritic or tree-like with smaller streams joining progressively larger ones (see Map 2-5). Thus, the watershed as a whole can be divided into a series of nested “subwatersheds” as illustrated by the HUC-8 through HUC-12 notation. Effective management of water quality in the basin as a whole depends on recognizing this fundamental structure of the watershed, starting with smaller units and addressing restoration and protection efforts to progressively larger, more inclusive ones. The objective, therefore, is to assess water- quality issues at their source, and to set priorities for remediating degraded parts of the watershed and protecting those that are not degraded but may be in danger of becoming so without effective management. Recommendations for addressing the restoration and protections issues uncovered in this assessment are discussed in Chapter 4. 3.2 Assessment Criteria and Procedure To complete this assessment, each of the 12-digit HUC subwatersheds in the Mohawk River Watershed was evaluated using a set of quantitative indicators for three aspects of watershed health: water quality, land use, and habitat. The evaluation assigned a score of 1 to 5 for each of various quantitative indicators (metrics) of watershed health. The scores associated with these metrics of watershed health were combined to a final score; some were weighted for overall significance. The amalgamated scores can be used to help define priority areas (subwatersheds with the lowest overall scores), while preserving important information regarding the underlying causes for concern. Quantitative indicators and resulting scores for the three aspects of watershed health are described in this section.
    [Show full text]