~F~L STABILIZATION for RENOTE AIRFIELDS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

~F~L STABILIZATION for RENOTE AIRFIELDS ~f~L STABILIZATION FOR RENOTE AIRFIELDS FINAL REPORT by Paul L. Koehmstedt Senior Research Scientist Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories P.O. Box 999 Richland, Washington 99352 January 1986 for STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO~ AND PUBLIC FACILITIES DIVISION OF PLANNING RESEARCH SECTION 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99701=6394 TIle contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of policies of the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. This report does not constitute a standard, speCification or regulation. ABSTRACT /1, laboratory study has been completed which involved extensive testing of two soil samples from the Bethel, Alaska area to determine if these soils can be stabilized with a combination of cement and asphalt emulsions, for use as subbase and base course materials for airfield and roadway appli­ cations. Three cationic slow-set set (C55-1) emulsions from different manufacturers were compared. Two of these were of standard manufacture, and the third was produced after selecting an emulsion based on the zeta potential and surface area of the test soils. Test results demonstrated that the use of an emulsion specially selected for the particular soil properties can result in major performance improve­ ments over standard production emulsions of the same grade. For the soils tested, similar strength levels were reached with 30 to 40% less of the specially select emulsion. Cement contents between 0.5 and 2. O~~ were added to a seri es of so i 1- emulsion mixes. Cement contents below 1.5% were generally of no benefit and in several cases actually reduced strength values. Cement contents of 2% consistently increased the mixture cohesive strengths by 20 to 80%. Tests of sands having different fines contents indicated that the optimum fines content for emulsion stabilization falls between 12 and 20 percent. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT The assistance of Professor Ronald Terrel and Amir Ahmadi of the University of Washington, Civil Engineering Laboratory, in this program is gratefully acknowledged. Their performance beyond contractural agreement was commendable . • v CONTENTS ABSTRACT . iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT v INTRODUCTION 1 PRIOR PROGRAM TESTS 5 PROGRAM OBJECTIVE 6 MATERIALS AND STABILIZATION CONCEPT. 7 LABORATORY TEST PROGRAM . 8 CHARACTERIZATION OF SOIL SAMPLES 12 MOISTURE CONTENT 12 AVERAGE ZETA POTENTIAL 13 AGGREGATE SURFACE AREA. 14 MECHANICAL ANALYSIS FOR SOILS (ALASKA T-l) 14 Particle Size Analysis of Soils (AASHTO T-27). 14 Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis (Alaska T-l) . 15 Specific Gravity (Alaska T-l) (AASHTO T-84) . 15 LIQUID LIMIT (ASTM D423-66), PLASTIC LIMIT AND PLASTICITY INDEX (ASTM D424-59) OF SOLIDS. 18 Moisture Density Relationship (AASHTO T-180, ASTM D1557) 18 ORGANIC CONTENT OF SOILS (ALASKA T-6) 21 Comparative Soil Characterization Data 21 ENGINEERING MEASUREMENTS, TEST SERIES 1 23 PRELIMINARY MIX DESIGN 25 CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) (ASTM D1883, AASHTO T 193-72) 27 HVEEM STABILITY AND COHESION (ASSHTO T-90) (ASTM D2844) 33 RESILIENT MODULUS (M ) 45 R vii CONTENTS (Continued) ENGINEERING MEASUREMENTS, TEST SERIES 2 50 PRELIMINARY DESIGN MIX 50 CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO. 53 TEST SERIES 2 CBR SPECIMEN COMPOSITION 54 Hveem Stability and Cohesion 54 RESILIENT MODULUS (M R) SERIES 2 58 FROST HEAVE SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS 60 Test Results 61 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 63 CHARACTERIZATION 63 ENGINEERING MEASUREMENTS 65 California Bearing Ratio (CBR). 65 STABILITY AND COHESION 68 FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS. 76 REFERENCES. 78 APPENDIX A - ASTM TEST METHOD D244-83a, EMULSIFIED ASPHALTS A.1 APPENDIX B - ASTM TEST METHOD D 2216-80, LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF \.JATER (MOISTURE) CONTENT OF SOIL, ROCK, AND SOIL-AGGREGATE MIXTURES B.1 APPENDIX C - ZETA POTENTIAL TEST METHOD C.1 APPENDIX D - AGGREGATE SURFACE AREA PART 1 - THE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOETHYL ETHER (EGME) TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING SOIL-SURFACE AREA D.1.1 PART 2 - DETERMINING SURFACE AREA . D.2.1 PART 3 - ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS D.3.1 PART 4 - SURFACE AREA OF AN IRREGULAR SOLID, BET Gas Adsorption Method D.4.1 viii CONTENTS (Continued) APPENDIX E - PROPOSED ASPHALT EMULSION COLD MIX DESIGN METHOD (Modification of the Marshall Method, ASTM 0-1559-82) . E.1 APPENDIX F - ALASKA FROST HEAVE TEST EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES F.1 ix FIGURES 1. Cationic Asphalt Emulsion Deposition. 4 2. Bethel Soil Test Sites. 9 3. Bethel Soil 10 Aggregate Grading Chart 16 4. Bethel Soil 20 Aggregate Grading Chart 17 5. Moisture-Density Relation Bethel Soil 10. 19 6. Moisture-Density Relation Bethel Soil 20. 20 7. Approximate Interrelationship of Soil Classification and Bearing Values 24 8. Soil 10 CBR Load Penetration 28 9. Soil 20 CBR Load Penetration 29 10. CBR and Density Plotted vs. Water Content 30 11. Test Series 1 Stability and Cohesion - Soil 10 41 12. Test Series 1 Stability and Cohesion - Soil 20 42 13. Design Chart for Thickness of Layers of Pavement Structure 44 14. Test Series 2 Moisture-Density Relationships . 51 15. Test Series 2 Stability and Cohesion - Soil 10 56 16. Test Series 2 Stability and Cohesion - Soil 20 57 17. Flexible Pavement Design Curves for Critical Areas, Dual Wheel Gear 66 18. Soil Support Value Correlations (5) 71 19. AASHO Flexible-Pavement Design Nomographs (5) 72 x TABLES 1. Moisture Content of Bethel Soils 13 2. Zeta Potential of Bethel Soils 13 3. Average Surface Area of Bethel Soils (EGME) 14 4. Particle Size Analysis of Bethel Soils (AASHTO T-27) 15 5. Specific Gravity Bethel Soils 15 6. Liquid Limit Bethel 2-20 . 18 7. Plastic Limit Bethel 2-20 18 8. Organic Content of Bethel Soils (Alaska T-6) 21 9. Comparative Bethel Soil Characteristics, % Passing Designated Screens 22 10. Preliminary Mix Design 25 11. Test Series 1, Specimen Preparation Matrix 26 12. California Bearing Ratio (Soaked, %) 31 13. Equivalency Factor Range for Stabilized Subbase 32 14. Equivalency Factor Range for Stabilized Base 32 15. Test Series 1, CBR, Soil 10 33 16. Summary of Test Data - U.S. Oil 504, Bethel Soil 10 35 17. Summary of Test Data - ARMAK E4868, Bethel Soil 10 36 18. Summary of Test Data - Chevron CSS-1, Bethel Soil 10 37 19. Summary of Test Data - U.S. Oil 504, Bethel Soil 20 38 20. Summary of Test Data - ARMAK E4868, Bethel Soil 20 39 21. Summary of Test Data - Chevron CSS-1, Bethel Soil 20 40 22. Specimens for Resilient Modulus, MR' 46 23. Summary of Resilient Modulus Tests for Bethel Soil 10 47 xi TABLES (Continued) 24. Summary of Resilient Modulus Tests for Bethel Soil 20 & Blend 48 25. Test Series 2 Mix Designs. 52 26. Test Series 2 Specimen Preparation Matrix 53 27. CBR Results, Test Series 2 54 28. Test Series 2 Hveem Stability and Cohesion Test Data 55 29. Resilient Modulus Test Data, Soil 10 59 30. Resilient Modulus Test Data, Soil 20 59 31. Frost Heave Specimen Composition 60 32. Frost Heave Specimen Water Content 61 33. Comparative Soil Specific Gravity 63 34. Modified Proctor Density . 64 35. Particle Size Distribution of Bethel Soils 64 36. Pavement Course Thickness Requirements (Crushed Aggregate) 65 37. Pavement Course Thickness Requirements (Asphalt-Cement). 67 38. Stabilization Materials Requirements 67 39. Approximate Runway Material Costs 68 40. Structural Layer Coefficients Developed From Various Sources. 73 41. Approximate Materials Requirements/Mile 74 xii I NTRODUCT ION The Yukon and Kuskokwim delta areas of Western Alaska lack gravel or bedrock suitable for airfield or roadway construction. Gravel must be imported by barge from sources considerable distances away. There is, then, an obvious benefit in using on-site materials as much as possible to minimize gravel importation. Sands of all types are plenti­ ful in this area of Alaska but they are poorly graded and are unusable as bases to support runway or roadway pavement. After freezing and thawing, the untreated soils of this region become unstable and non­ supportive of the wheel loadings on overlying coarse gravel or paving. Roads within this area of Alaska are unpaved and subject to exces­ sive erosion and hazardous conditions during thaw or rainy periods. Some 300 airstrips within this region depend upon natural grass growth for stabilization and erosion control. Consequently, both airfields and roads have limited ability to support vehicular weight during the warm season and even less during thaw or wet conditions. Admixed gravel, normally used where only poorly graded fine sand or silty sand prevails, is essentially unavailable and must be imported by barge from consider­ able distance at great expense. Sand stabilization-in-place by admixing of stabilization agents with on-site sand or silt appeared to be a financially viable alternative. Only low cost, low concentration asphalt emulsions and Portland cement stabilizers were considered. Lime, another low-cost stabilizer, is useful primarily in clayey soils which are rare in Alaska. Asphalt emulsion-soil mixtures must be especially adapted to Alaskan conditions. Asphalt emulsions, which typically contain 25 to 40% by weight water, are considered impractical to use in cold, wet climates. After emulsion addition the asphalt attaches to the aggregate surfaces and the residual water must dissipate via evaporation or percolation until a low level admixture water content remains. Controlled water level is necessary as a lubricant during compaction of asphalt emulsion­ soil admixtures. Cure times of ambient temperature emulsion-aggregate admixtures are long and often unpredictable in Alaskan environments. 1 With the advent of the mobile emulsification plant, hot emulsion (about 130 to 150°F) can be used. This reacts much more rapidly with sandy soils, forming hydrophobic admixtures which expel residual water. Cure times are shortened and therefore the entire process may be more suitable for Alaskan applications. On-site emulsification has the additional attractive feature of using on-site water which saves up to 40% of the asphalt emulsion transportation costs.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2008 – 2009
    O L D S T U R B R I D G E Summer 2009 Special Annual VILLAGE Report Edition Visitor 2008-2009 2008--2009 Momentum and More The History of Fireworks Farms, Families, and Change Cooking with OSV Summer Events a member magazine that keeps you coming back Old Sturbridge Village, a museum and learning resource of 2008-2009 Building Momentum New England life, invites each visitor to find meaning, pleasure, a letter from President Jim Donahue relevance, and inspiration through the exploration of history. to our newly designed V I S I T O R magazine. We hope that you will learn new things and come to visit t is no secret around the Village that I like to keep my eye on the “dashboard” – a set of key the Village soon. There is always something fun to do at indicators that I am consistently checking to make sure we are steering OSV in the right direction. In fact, Welcome O l d S T u R b ri d g E V I l l a g E . I take a lot of good-natured kidding about how often I peek at the attendance figures each day, eager to see if we beat last year’s number. And I have to admit that I get energized when the daily mail brings in new donations, when the sun is shining, the parking lot is full, when I can hear happy children touring the Village, and the visitor comments are upbeat and favorable. Volume XlIX, No. 2 Summer 2009 Special Annual Report Edition I am happy to report these indicators have been overwhelmingly positive during the past year – solid proof that Old Sturbridge Village is building on last year’s successes and is poised to finish this decade much stronger There is nothing quite like learning about history from than when it started.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcano House Register Volume 2
    Haw VolcanoesNa al Park National Service Park The Volcano House Register, Volume 2 1873-1885 In this volume, on almost every page, there are entries in which a writer merely gives his name, date, times of arrival and departure, and destination. In the other volumes, whenever this occurs, I mention that I omitted such an entry, and give the page number. But because there are so many such entries in this particular volume, it would become tedious both for the transcriber to record and the reader to read every case of such omission; so I am doing it once only, here at the beginning of the document. On the page facing page 1, there is a rough table of contents, listing the page numbers of various maps and signatures of Kalakaua, Louis Pasteur, etc. In addition, there is a poem: Index Some good Some mediocre And much rotten For the Lord's sake Don't write unless You have somethingHawai'i Volcanoes Park To say & can say it. National Park Ser no signature and no date Between 11 and 12 last night Mokuaweoweo started action again. The wind has been from the southward, and the whole day a dense body of smoke has been passing over Kilauea and across Puna, off to sea. Evidently a much greater portion of the crater is in action than in the eruption of August last. Had a heavy thunder shower about dusk with hail and this evening there is considerable lightning. Weather hazy and top of mountain seldom visible. Kilauea quite active but no lava flowing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra
    THE COMPOSITION OF THE LUNAR CRUST: RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF LUNAR VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED SPECTRA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS DECEMBER 2009 By Joshua T.S. Cahill Dissertation Committee: Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson G. Jeffrey Taylor Patricia Fryer Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis Trevor Sorensen Student: Joshua T.S. Cahill Student ID#: 1565-1460 Field: Geology and Geophysics Graduation date: December 2009 Title: The Composition of the Lunar Crust: Radiative Transfer Modeling and Analysis of Lunar Visible and Near-Infrared Spectra We certify that we have read this dissertation and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology and Geophysics. Dissertation Committee: Names Signatures Paul G. Lucey, Chairperson ____________________________ G. Jeffrey Taylor ____________________________ Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis ____________________________ Patricia Fryer ____________________________ Trevor Sorensen ____________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must first express my love and appreciation to my family. Thank you to my wife Karen for providing love, support, and perspective. And to our little girl Maggie who only recently became part of our family and has already provided priceless memories in the form of beautiful smiles, belly laughs, and little bear hugs. The two of you provided me with the most meaningful reasons to push towards the "finish line". I would also like to thank my immediate and extended family. Many of them do not fully understand much about what I do, but support the endeavor acknowledging that if it is something I’m willing to put this much effort into, it must be worthwhile.
    [Show full text]
  • South Pole-Aitken Basin
    Feasibility Assessment of All Science Concepts within South Pole-Aitken Basin INTRODUCTION While most of the NRC 2007 Science Concepts can be investigated across the Moon, this chapter will focus on specifically how they can be addressed in the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). SPA is potentially the largest impact crater in the Solar System (Stuart-Alexander, 1978), and covers most of the central southern farside (see Fig. 8.1). SPA is both topographically and compositionally distinct from the rest of the Moon, as well as potentially being the oldest identifiable structure on the surface (e.g., Jolliff et al., 2003). Determining the age of SPA was explicitly cited by the National Research Council (2007) as their second priority out of 35 goals. A major finding of our study is that nearly all science goals can be addressed within SPA. As the lunar south pole has many engineering advantages over other locations (e.g., areas with enhanced illumination and little temperature variation, hydrogen deposits), it has been proposed as a site for a future human lunar outpost. If this were to be the case, SPA would be the closest major geologic feature, and thus the primary target for long-distance traverses from the outpost. Clark et al. (2008) described four long traverses from the center of SPA going to Olivine Hill (Pieters et al., 2001), Oppenheimer Basin, Mare Ingenii, and Schrödinger Basin, with a stop at the South Pole. This chapter will identify other potential sites for future exploration across SPA, highlighting sites with both great scientific potential and proximity to the lunar South Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 VO Annual Report PUB 2000.Pub
    Vatican Observatory Annual Report 2004 Vatican Observatory (Castel Gandolfo) V-00120 Città del Vaticano Rome ITALY Vatican Observatory Research Group Steward Observatory University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA http://vaticanobservatory.org Vatican Observatory Publications Vatican Observatory Staff The following are permanent staff members of the Vatican Observatory, Castel Gandolfo, It- aly, and the Vatican Observatory Research Group (VORG), Tucson, Arizona: GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J., Director JAMES J. BOWES, S.J. SABINO MAFFEO, S.J., RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J. Special Assistant to the Director JUAN CASANOVAS, S.J. ALESSANDRO OMIZZOLO GUY J. CONSOLMAGNO, S.J. WILLIAM R. STOEGER, S.J. CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J., ANDREW P. WHITMAN, S.J., Vice Director for VORG; Administrator VORG President, National Committee to International Astronomical Union Adjunct Scholars: JOSÉ G. FUNES, S.J. EMMANUEL M. CARREIRA, S.J. JEAN-BAPTISTE KIKWAYA, S.J. LOUIS CARUANA, S.J. GIUSEPPE KOCH, S.J. MICHAEL HELLER Vice Director for Administration ROBERT JANUSZ, S.J. GUSTAV TERES, S.J. Vatican Observatory Foundation Board of Directors Officers GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J., President PAUL M. HENKELS, Chairman of the Board CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J., First Vice President RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J., Second Vice President WILLIAM R. STOEGER, S.J., Secretary MANUEL J. ESPINOZA, Treasurer Directors RICHARD P. BOYLE, S.J. SHEILA GRINELL CHRISTOPHER J. CORBALLY, S.J. JOHN B. HENKELS GEORGE V. COYNE, S.J. PAUL M. HENKELS MICHAEL A. CRONIN CHRISTOPHER P. HITCHCOCK CHARLES L. CURRIE, S.J. JOHN B. HOLLYWOOD, S.J. BEN DALBY ROCCO L. MARTINO KAREN DALBY JAMES C. McGEE PAULA D’ANGELO PETER P.
    [Show full text]
  • 304 Index Index Index
    _full_alt_author_running_head (change var. to _alt_author_rh): 0 _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (change var. to _alt_arttitle_rh): 0 _full_article_language: en 304 Index Index Index Adamson, Robert (1821–1848) 158 Astronomische Gesellschaft 216 Akkasbashi, Reza (1843–1889) viiii, ix, 73, Astrolog 72 75-78, 277 Astronomical unit, the 192-94 Airy, George Biddell (1801–1892) 137, 163, 174 Astrophysics xiv, 7, 41, 57, 118, 119, 139, 144, Albedo 129, 132, 134 199, 216, 219 Aldrin, Edwin Buzz (1930) xii, 244, 245, 248, Atlas Photographique de la Lune x, 15, 126, 251, 261 127, 279 Almagestum Novum viii, 44-46, 274 Autotypes 186 Alpha Particle Spectrometer 263 Alpine mountains of Monte Rosa and BAAS “(British Association for the Advance- the Zugspitze, the 163 ment of Science)” 26, 27, 125, 128, 137, Al-Biruni (973–1048) 61 152, 158, 174, 277 Al-Fath Muhammad Sultan, Abu (n.d.) 64 BAAS Lunar Committee 125, 172 Al-Sufi, Abd al-Rahman (903–986) 61, 62 Bahram Mirza (1806–1882) 72 Al-Tusi, Nasir al-Din (1202–1274) 61 Baillaud, Édouard Benjamin (1848–1934) 119 Amateur astronomer xv, 26, 50, 51, 56, 60, Ball, Sir Robert (1840–1913) 147 145, 151 Barlow Lens 195, 203 Amir Kabir (1807–1852) 71 Barnard, Edward Emerson (1857–1923) 136 Amir Nezam Garusi (1820–1900) 87 Barnard Davis, Joseph (1801–1881) 180 Analysis of the Moon’s environment 239 Beamish, Richard (1789–1873) 178-81 Andromeda nebula xii, 208, 220-22 Becker, Ernst (1843–1912) 81 Antoniadi, Eugène M. (1870–1944) 269 Beer, Wilhelm Wolff (1797–1850) ix, 54, 56, Apollo Missions NASA 32, 231, 237, 239, 240, 60, 123, 124, 126, 130, 139, 142, 144, 157, 258, 261, 272 190 Apollo 8 xii, 32, 239-41 Bell Laboratories 270 Apollo 11 xii, 59, 237, 240, 244-46, 248-52, Beg, Ulugh (1394–1449) 63, 64 261, 280 Bergedorf 207 Apollo 13 254 Bergedorfer Spektraldurchmusterung 216 Apollo 14 240, 253-55 Biancani, Giuseppe (n.d.) 40, 274 Apollo 15 255 Biot, Jean Baptiste (1774–1862) 1,8, 9, 121 Apollo 16 240, 255-57 Birt, William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Comments
    The Center for Biological Diversity submits the following information for the status review of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) (Docket #FWS-R8-ES-2015-0050), including substantial new information regarding the species' biology, population structure (including potential Distinct Population Segments of the species), historical and recent distribution and status, population trends, documented range contraction, habitat requirements, threats to the species and its habitat, disease, and the potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat. The foothill yellow-legged frog has experienced extensive population declines throughout its range and a significant range contraction. Multiple threats continue unabated throughout much of the species’ remaining range, including impacts from dams, water development, water diversions, timber harvest, mining, marijuana cultivation, livestock grazing, roads and urbanization, recreation, climate change and UV-radiation, pollution, invasive species and disease. The species warrants listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Contact: Jeff Miller, [email protected] Contents: NATURAL HISTORY, BIOLOGY AND STATUS . .. 2 Biology. .2 Habitat . .. .4 Range and Documented Range Contraction . 4 Taxonomy . 9 Population Structure . 9 Historical and Recent Distribution and Status . 15 Central Oregon . .15 Southern Oregon . 18 Coastal Oregon . .20 Northern Coastal California . 25 Upper Sacramento River . 40 Marin/Sonoma . 45 Northern/Central Sierra Nevada . .47 Southern Sierra Nevada . .67 Central Coast/Bay Area . 77 South Coast. 91 Southern California . .. 94 Baja California, Mexico . .98 Unknown Population Affiliation. .99 Population Trends . .. .103 THREATS. .108 Habitat Alteration and Destruction . .. 108 Dams, Water Development and Diversions . .. .109 Logging . .. .111 Marijuana Cultivation . .. .112 Livestock Grazing . .. .112 Mining . .. .. .113 Roads and Urbanization .
    [Show full text]
  • JRASC August 2019 Lo-Res
    The Journal of The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada PROMOTING ASTRONOMY IN CANADA August/août 2019 Volume/volume 113 Le Journal de la Société royale d’astronomie du Canada Number/numéro 4 [797] Inside this issue: In Memoriam Jim Bernath Exploration of the Sky: The Skies Sketchbook A blooming Iris Nebula The Best of Monochrome. Drawings, images in black and white, or narrow-band photography. This beautiful image of the Crescent Nebula (NGC 6888) was taken by Andre Paquette. Andre used a Planewave CDK 12.5” on a CGE Pro with an Apogee U16M camera and an Astrodon Hα 4 nm filter. He guided using Celestron Skyris 274M and processed with Photoshop, Maxim DL, Bliss MetaGuide. August / août 2019 | Vol. 113, No. 4 | Whole Number 797 contents / table des matières Feature Articles / Articles de fond 166 CFHT Chronicles: 40 Years and a Users’ Meeting by Mary Beth Laychak 136 Jim Bernath: In Memoriam, 1929–2019 By Suzanna Nagy 171 John Percy’s Universe: Donald A. MacRae (1916–2006): An Under-Recognized Canadian 138 Exploration of the Sky: The Skies Astronomer Sketchbook by J.M.W. Turner by John R. Percy by Natalia Bosko, Courtauld Institute of Art 174 Dish on the Cosmos: Seeing the Event Horizon 152 Pen and Pixel: M104 / Orion Nebula by Erik Rosolowsky and Running Man / M13 / Luna by Dan Meek / Adrian Aberdeen / Ron Brecher / Paul Owen Departments / Départements Columns / Rubriques 130 President’s Corner by Dr. Chris Gainor 151 Second Light: My Flight on SOFIA by Leslie J. Sage 131 News Notes / En manchettes Compiled by Jay Anderson 154 Observing Tips: What Is an Observation? by Chris Beckett 176 Astrocryptic and August Answers by Curt Nason 157 Astronomical Art & Artifact: The Republic of Letters 176 It’s Not All Sirius by R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Concept 3: Key Planetary
    Science Concept 6: The Moon is an Accessible Laboratory for Studying the Impact Process on Planetary Scales Science Concept 6: The Moon is an accessible laboratory for studying the impact process on planetary scales Science Goals: a. Characterize the existence and extent of melt sheet differentiation. b. Determine the structure of multi-ring impact basins. c. Quantify the effects of planetary characteristics (composition, density, impact velocities) on crater formation and morphology. d. Measure the extent of lateral and vertical mixing of local and ejecta material. INTRODUCTION Impact cratering is a fundamental geological process which is ubiquitous throughout the Solar System. Impacts have been linked with the formation of bodies (e.g. the Moon; Hartmann and Davis, 1975), terrestrial mass extinctions (e.g. the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary extinction; Alvarez et al., 1980), and even proposed as a transfer mechanism for life between planetary bodies (Chyba et al., 1994). However, the importance of impacts and impact cratering has only been realized within the last 50 or so years. Here we briefly introduce the topic of impact cratering. The main crater types and their features are outlined as well as their formation mechanisms. Scaling laws, which attempt to link impacts at a variety of scales, are also introduced. Finally, we note the lack of extraterrestrial crater samples and how Science Concept 6 addresses this. Crater Types There are three distinct crater types: simple craters, complex craters, and multi-ring basins (Fig. 6.1). The type of crater produced in an impact is dependent upon the size, density, and speed of the impactor, as well as the strength and gravitational field of the target.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Henri Victor Regnault in the Arts and Sciences Sébastien Poncet, Laurie Dahlberg
    The legacy of Henri Victor Regnault in the arts and sciences Sébastien Poncet, Laurie Dahlberg To cite this version: Sébastien Poncet, Laurie Dahlberg. The legacy of Henri Victor Regnault in the arts and sciences. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 2011, 4 (13), pp.377-400. hal-00678894 HAL Id: hal-00678894 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00678894 Submitted on 14 Mar 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Legacy of Henri Victor Regnault in the Arts and Sciences Sébastien Poncet , Laboratoire M2P2, France Laurie Dahlberg , Bard College Annandale, USA Abstract: The 21 st of July 2010 marked the bicentennial of the birth of Henri Victor Regnault, a famous French chemist and physicist and a pioneer of paper photography. During his lifetime, he received many honours and distinctions for his invaluable scientific contributions, especially to experimental thermodynamics. Colleague of the celebrated chemist Louis-Joseph Gay-Lussac (1778-1850) at the École des Mines and mentor of William Thomson (1824-1907) at the École Polytechnique, he is nowadays conspicuously absent from all the textbooks and reviews (Hertz, 2004) dealing with thermodynamics. This paper is thus the opportunity to recall his major contributions to the field of experimental thermodynamics but also to the nascent field, in those days, of organic chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Extraction of Potential Impact Structures from Geospatial Data – Examples from Finnmark, Northern Norway
    Automatic extraction of potential impact structures from geospatial data – examples from Finnmark, Northern Norway Svein Olav Krøgli Dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor (Ph.D.) Department of Geosciences Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Oslo 2010 © Svein Olav Krøgli, 2010 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo No. 948 ISSN 1501-7710 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Inger Sandved Anfinsen. Printed in Norway: AiT e-dit AS. Produced in co-operation with Unipub. The thesis is produced by Unipub merely in connection with the thesis defence. Kindly direct all inquiries regarding the thesis to the copyright holder or the unit which grants the doctorate. Preface This work constitute my Ph.D. study that started with the working title “Automatic and semi- automatic detection of meteorite impact structures in the Fennoscandian shield using pattern recognition of spatial data”. The study area was constrained to Finnmark, Northern Norway, due to data accessibility. The thesis presents results from my three year employment as a Ph.D. research fellow at the Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo (2006 – 2009), with supervisors Professor Henning Dypvik and Professor Bernd Etzelmüller. It consists of a summary, three papers and two peer reviewed extended abstracts describing different automatic search techniques. Sometimes a description of the novel Beyond Sleep by W. F. Hermans fits the study: “A classic of post-war European literature, this is the tale of a man at the limits of physical and mental endurance beyond the end of the civilised world”, where the limits of physical and mental endurance is crater search and the end of the civilised world is Finnmarksvidda.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Concept 3: Key Planetary Processes Are Manifested in the Diversity of Lunar Crustal Rocks
    Science Concept 3: Key Planetary Processes are Manifested in the Diversity of Lunar Crustal Rocks Science Concept 3: Key planetary processes are manifested in the diversity of crustal rocks Science Goals: a. Determine the extent and composition of the primary feldspathic crust, KREEP layer, and other products of differentiation. b. Inventory the variety, age, distribution, and origin of lunar rock types. c. Determine the composition of the lower crust and bulk Moon. d. Quantify the local and regional complexity of the current lunar crust. e. Determine the vertical extent and structure of the megaregolith. INTRODUCTION Formation and Evolution of the Moon The Moon is a unique environment, preserving crucial information about the early history and later evolution of the solar system. The lack of major surficial tectonic processes within the past few billion years or so, as well as the lack of significant quantities of surface water, have allowed for excellent preservation of the lithologies and geomorphological features that formed during the major planetary formation events. Fundamental discoveries during the Apollo program showed that the Moon is made up of a variety of volcanic and impact rock types that exhibit a particular range of chemical and mineralogical compositions. The key planetary processes conveyed by this diversity include planetary differentiation, volcanism, and impact cratering. Analysis of Apollo, Luna, and lunar meteoritic samples, as well as orbital data from a series of lunar exploration missions, generated geophysical models that strove to tell the story of the Moon. However, such models are restricted in the sense that they are based on information gathered from the samples that have so far been acquired.
    [Show full text]