Violent Literatures Uniting the Nation; Revealing the State Stacey Hunt
[email protected] Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey January 17, 2007 Draft version only: not for citation Introduction The production of national literature has long been considered an essential component of the formation of nation-states. Newspapers (Anderson 1983, Castro-Klaren and Chasteen 2003), “foundational fictions” (Sommer 1991), novels, constitutions, laws (Rama 1984, Rojas 2003) are all associated with the birth of the nation-state. Yet the production of nation-states is an on-going process (Woods 2000). Few studies have explored the role of writing in the continuous production of the nation-state. In this paper, I trace the role of literature in (re)producing the Colombian state from its inception to the present day. While nineteenth-century political elite – career politicians and public office holders – reserved the absolute and sole ability to “write” Colombia, both fictionally and legally, the contemporary state takes quite another approach to writing the nation-state. Public office holders have relinquished some control over who produces national literature. While keeping the act of authoring the nation an elite project, they have largely devolved the activity to elite scholars of journalism or literature. This new body of authors has (re)written the nation-state around a national origins myth in violence. In turn, the state has increasingly sought to foment a culture of reading, democratizing access to and increasing consumption of what remains a largely elite-produced body of literature. In this paper, I study the (re)centering of the nation around violence through national literature.