Continuous Natural Vector Theory of Electromagnetism H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Continuous Natural Vector Theory of Electromagnetism H UET2 Continuous Natural Vector Theory of Electromagnetism H. J. Spencer * II ABSTRACT A new algebraic representation is used to immediately recover all the major results of classical electromagnetism. This new representation (‘Natural Vectors’) is based on Hamilton’s quaternions and completes the original attempt by Maxwell to use this powerful, non-commutative algebra in the final presentation of his theory in his Treatise. The foundational hypothesis here is that the principal electromagnetic variables are best represented by Natural Vectors, rather than the conventional 3D vectors defined by ‘real numbers’. The present results avoid all use of the field concept and validate the retarded scalar and vector potentials approach first introduced by L. V. Lorenz, who combined Gauss’s 1845 suggestion of the finite speed of interaction with Newton’s action-at-a-distance model of physics into a charge-potential model of electromagnetism in 1867. This new approach demonstrates the primacy and physical significance of the ‘Lorenz gauge’. Not withstanding Maxwell’s aether theory, the present results are based on the continuous charge-density substance model of electricity that is used today to develop Maxwell’s Equations for classical electromagnetism. The present analysis also demonstrates that Helmholtz’s ‘fluid’ model of electricity is one of the few that can result in an electromagnetic ‘explanation’ for the phenomenon of light. Unlike algebraic Minkowski 4-vectors, the more powerful 4-dimensional covariant Natural Vectors used here generate all the differential equations normally found in classical electromagnetism in an immediate and direct algebraic manner. This new theory focuses on the remote interaction between charges, which then appears both as variations in the charge-density and the potentials “traveling at light-speed across space”. Surprisingly, this same result also appears for the current-density; this suggests that the conventional interpretation of this major symbol in Maxwell’s Equations needs to be questioned further. * SPSI, Surrey, B.C. Canada (604) 542-2299 [email protected] © H. J. Spencer Version 2.3 25-07-2012 Version 2.0 30-11-2007 Version 1.0 16-06-2007 UET2 Continuous Natural Vector Theory of Electromagnetism ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 9 1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.1 RESEARCH PROGRAMME ............................................................................................... 9 A Major Paradigm Shift ............................................................................................................. 9 Maxwell’s Introductions ............................................................................................................ 9 Einstein just wanted to understand Electrons ............................................................................ 9 Newton’s Introduction to Principia ........................................................................................... 9 The Continuum Hypothesis ...................................................................................................... 10 The Continuum Fallacy ............................................................................................................ 10 Physics: Two, One, Zero Objects ............................................................................................. 10 The Four Basic Concepts ......................................................................................................... 10 Euclidean Theory ..................................................................................................................... 10 Relying on Visualization .......................................................................................................... 10 1.1.2 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 11 The Value of Natural Vectors in EM ........................................................................................ 11 The Value of Philosophy & History ......................................................................................... 11 Investigating the Charge-Potential EM Model ........................................................................ 11 1.1.3 PHILOSOPY IS IMPORTANT .......................................................................................... 11 Modern Physics rejects Philosophy ......................................................................................... 11 Feynman View of Physics ........................................................................................................ 11 Maxwell’s View of Science ....................................................................................................... 12 Defining Reality ....................................................................................................................... 12 ‘Schoolmen’ prefer the Plenum ............................................................................................... 12 Aether, not Ether ...................................................................................................................... 12 Human Bias .............................................................................................................................. 12 1.1.4 HISTORY IS IMPORTANT .............................................................................................. 12 Nineteenth Century EM Mythology ......................................................................................... 12 History is always Important ..................................................................................................... 13 A Brief History of Electricity ................................................................................................... 13 Maxwell’s Treatise ................................................................................................................... 13 Maxwell started with the Potentials ......................................................................................... 13 Not the Maxwell-Hertz Equations ............................................................................................ 13 1.1.5 THE RISE OF FIELD THEORY ....................................................................................... 14 Maxwell’s Philosophical Introductions ................................................................................... 14 Maxwell rejects Action-at-a-Distance ..................................................................................... 14 Infinite Decimal Numbers are not Real ................................................................................... 14 Continuous Matter in 19th Century .......................................................................................... 14 Misdirection of Natural Philosophy ......................................................................................... 14 1.2 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 15 1.2.1 THEORETICAL PHYSICS IS METAPHYSICS .............................................................. 15 Philosophy must be Explicit ..................................................................................................... 15 Maxwell’s Natural Philosophy Questions ............................................................................... 15 The Principle of ‘Least Change’ .............................................................................................. 15 1.2.2 METAPHYSICS OF ELECTROMAGNETISM ............................................................... 15 The Necessity of Metaphysics .................................................................................................. 15 Aetherial EM Metaphysics ....................................................................................................... 16 Contemporary Views on Classical EM .................................................................................... 16 EM Alternatives to Maxwell ..................................................................................................... 16 1.2.3 MAXWELL-HEAVISIDE AETHER THEORY ............................................................... 16 1.2.4 MODERN CLASSICAL ELECTRODYNAMICS ............................................................ 17 1.2.5 SUMMARY OF CONTINUOUS NATURAL VECTORS ............................................... 17 1.2.6 THE CNV ELECTROMAGNETIC MODEL .................................................................... 17 1.2.7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................. 17 2. METAPHYSICS OF ELECTROMAGNETISM .......................................................................... 18 2.1 THE NECESSITY OF METAPHYSICS .................................................................................. 18 The Goal of Physics ................................................................................................................. 18 2.1.1 NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Albert Einstein
    THE COLLECTED PAPERS OF Albert Einstein VOLUME 15 THE BERLIN YEARS: WRITINGS & CORRESPONDENCE JUNE 1925–MAY 1927 Diana Kormos Buchwald, József Illy, A. J. Kox, Dennis Lehmkuhl, Ze’ev Rosenkranz, and Jennifer Nollar James EDITORS Anthony Duncan, Marco Giovanelli, Michel Janssen, Daniel J. Kennefick, and Issachar Unna ASSOCIATE & CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Emily de Araújo, Rudy Hirschmann, Nurit Lifshitz, and Barbara Wolff ASSISTANT EDITORS Princeton University Press 2018 Copyright © 2018 by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA (Revised for volume 15) Einstein, Albert, 1879–1955. The collected papers of Albert Einstein. German, English, and French. Includes bibliographies and indexes. Contents: v. 1. The early years, 1879–1902 / John Stachel, editor — v. 2. The Swiss years, writings, 1900–1909 — — v. 15. The Berlin years, writings and correspondence, June 1925–May 1927 / Diana Kormos Buchwald... [et al.], editors. QC16.E5A2 1987 530 86-43132 ISBN 0-691-08407-6 (v.1) ISBN 978-0-691-17881-3 (v. 15) This book has been composed in Times. The publisher would like to acknowledge the editors of this volume for providing the camera-ready copy from which this book was printed. Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed in the United States of America 13579108642 INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME 15 The present volume covers a thrilling two-year period in twentieth-century physics, for during this time matrix mechanics—developed by Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and Pascual Jordan—and wave mechanics, developed by Erwin Schrödinger, supplanted the earlier quantum theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
    Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Proceedings International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity Prague, Czech Republic October 25-27, 2004 Editors Kjell Hansson Mild Mike Repacholi Emilie van Deventer Paolo Ravazzani WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: International Workshop on Electromagnetic Field Hypersensitivity (2004 : Prague, Czech Republic) Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity : proceedings, International Workshop on Electromagnetic Field Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25-27, 2004 / editors, Kjell Hansson Mild, Mike Repacholi, Emilie van Deventer, and Paolo Ravazzani. 1.Electromagnetic fields - adverse effects. 2.Hypersensitivity. 3.Environmental exposure. 4.Psychophysiologic disorders. I.Mild, Kjell Hansson. II.Repacholi, Michael H. III.Deventer, Emilie van. IV.Ravazzani, Paolo. V.World Health Organization. VI.Title. VII.Title: Proceedings, International Workshop on Electromagnetic Field Hypersensitivity, Prague, Czech Republic, October 25-27, 2004. ISBN 92 4 159412 8 (NLM classification: QT 34) ISBN 978 92 4 159412 7 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Induction Heating Theoretical Background
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 28 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: CRC Press Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK Handbook of Induction Heating Valery Rudnev, Don Loveless, Raymond L. Cook Theoretical Background Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/9781315117485-3 Valery Rudnev, Don Loveless, Raymond L. Cook Published online on: 11 Jul 2017 How to cite :- Valery Rudnev, Don Loveless, Raymond L. Cook. 11 Jul 2017, Theoretical Background from: Handbook of Induction Heating CRC Press Accessed on: 28 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/9781315117485-3 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 Theoretical Background Induction heating (IH) is a multiphysical phenomenon comprising a complex interac- tion of electromagnetic, heat transfer, metallurgical phenomena, and circuit analysis that are tightly interrelated and highly nonlinear because the physical properties of materi- als depend on magnetic field intensity, temperature, and microstructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Voigt Transformations in Retrospect: Missed Opportunities?
    Voigt transformations in retrospect: missed opportunities? Olga Chashchina Ecole´ Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France∗ Natalya Dudisheva Novosibirsk State University, 630 090, Novosibirsk, Russia† Zurab K. Silagadze Novosibirsk State University and Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630 090, Novosibirsk, Russia.‡ The teaching of modern physics often uses the history of physics as a didactic tool. However, as in this process the history of physics is not something studied but used, there is a danger that the history itself will be distorted in, as Butterfield calls it, a “Whiggish” way, when the present becomes the measure of the past. It is not surprising that reading today a paper written more than a hundred years ago, we can extract much more of it than was actually thought or dreamed by the author himself. We demonstrate this Whiggish approach on the example of Woldemar Voigt’s 1887 paper. From the modern perspective, it may appear that this paper opens a way to both the special relativity and to its anisotropic Finslerian generalization which came into the focus only recently, in relation with the Cohen and Glashow’s very special relativity proposal. With a little imagination, one can connect Voigt’s paper to the notorious Einstein-Poincar´epri- ority dispute, which we believe is a Whiggish late time artifact. We use the related historical circumstances to give a broader view on special relativity, than it is usually anticipated. PACS numbers: 03.30.+p; 1.65.+g Keywords: Special relativity, Very special relativity, Voigt transformations, Einstein-Poincar´epriority dispute I. INTRODUCTION Sometimes Woldemar Voigt, a German physicist, is considered as “Relativity’s forgotten figure” [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Upward Electrical Discharges from Thunderstorm Tops
    UPWARD ELECTRICAL DISCHARGES FROM THUNDERSTORM TOPS BY WALTER A. LYONS, CCM, THOMAS E. NELSON, RUSSELL A. ARMSTRONG, VICTOR P. PASKO, AND MARK A. STANLEY Mesospheric lightning-related sprites and elves, not attached to their parent thunderstorm’s tops, are being joined by a family of upward electrical discharges, including blue jets, emerging directly from thunderstorm tops. or over 100 years, persistent eyewitness reports in (Wilson 1956). On the night of 6 July 1989, while the scientific literature have recounted a variety testing a low-light television camera (LLTV) for an Fof brief atmospheric electrical phenomena above upcoming rocket launch, the late Prof. John R. thunderstorms (Lyons et al. 2000). The startled ob- Winckler of the University of Minnesota made a most servers, not possessing a technical vocabulary with serendipitous observation. Replay of the video tape which to report their observations, used terms as var- revealed two frames showing brilliant columns of ied as “rocket lightning,” “cloud-to-stratosphere light extending far into the stratosphere above dis- lightning,” “upward lightning,” and even “cloud-to- tant thunderstorms (Franz et al. 1990). This single space lightning” (Fig. 1). Absent hard documenta- observation has energized specialists in scientific dis- tion, the atmospheric electricity community gave ciplines as diverse as space physics, radio science, at- little credence to such anecdotal reports, even one mospheric electricity, atmospheric acoustics, and originating with a Nobel Prize winner in physics
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Structure of the Stratosphere and Mesophere
    1969 (6th) Vol. 1 Space, Technology, and The Space Congress® Proceedings Society Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Electrical Structure of the Stratosphere and Mesophere Willis L. Webb U.S. Army Electronics Command Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Webb, Willis L., "Electrical Structure of the Stratosphere and Mesophere" (1969). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 1. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1969-6th-v1/session-16/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE OF THE STRATOSPHERE AND MESOSPHERE Will is L. V/ebb Atmospheric Sciences Laboratory U S Army Electronics Command White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico Synoptic rocket exploration of the strato­ exploration of the earth's upper atmosphere using spheric circulation has revealed the presence of small rocket vehicles was initiated to extend the hemispheric tidal circulations that are indicated region of meteorological study to higher alti­ to be in part characterized by systematic vertical tudes* . This meteorological rocket network (MRN) motions in low latitudes of the sunlit hemisphere. has expanded the atmospheric volume currently sub­ These vertical motions are powered by meridional ject to meteorological scrutiny from limitations oscillations in the stratospheric circulation pro­ of the order of 30-km peak altitude to a current duced by solar heating of the stratopause region synoptic data ceiling of the order of 80 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Ether and Electrons in Relativity Theory (1900-1911) Scott Walter
    Ether and electrons in relativity theory (1900-1911) Scott Walter To cite this version: Scott Walter. Ether and electrons in relativity theory (1900-1911). Jaume Navarro. Ether and Moder- nity: The Recalcitrance of an Epistemic Object in the Early Twentieth Century, Oxford University Press, 2018, 9780198797258. hal-01879022 HAL Id: hal-01879022 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01879022 Submitted on 21 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ether and electrons in relativity theory (1900–1911) Scott A. Walter∗ To appear in J. Navarro, ed, Ether and Modernity, 67–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018 Abstract This chapter discusses the roles of ether and electrons in relativity the- ory. One of the most radical moves made by Albert Einstein was to dismiss the ether from electrodynamics. His fellow physicists felt challenged by Einstein’s view, and they came up with a variety of responses, ranging from enthusiastic approval, to dismissive rejection. Among the naysayers were the electron theorists, who were unanimous in their affirmation of the ether, even if they agreed with other aspects of Einstein’s theory of relativity. The eventual success of the latter theory (circa 1911) owed much to Hermann Minkowski’s idea of four-dimensional spacetime, which was portrayed as a conceptual substitute of sorts for the ether.
    [Show full text]
  • Corry L. David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics, 1898-1918
    Archimedes Volume 10 Archimedes NEW STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 10 EDITOR JED Z. BUCHWALD, Dreyfuss Professor of History, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. ADVISORY BOARD HENK BOS, University of Utrecht MORDECHAI FEINGOLD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute ALLAN D. FRANKLIN, University of Colorado at Boulder KOSTAS GAVROGLU, National Technical University of Athens ANTHONY GRAFTON, Princeton University FREDERIC L. HOLMES, Yale University PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE, University of Hannover EVELYN FOX KELLER, MIT TREVOR LEVERE, University of Toronto JESPER LÜTZEN, Copenhagen University WILLIAM NEWMAN, Harvard University JÜRGEN RENN, Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte ALEX ROLAND, Duke University ALAN SHAPIRO, University of Minnesota NANCY SIRAISI, Hunter College of the City University of New York NOEL SWERDLOW, University of Chicago Archimedes has three fundamental goals; to further the integration of the histories of science and technology with one another: to investigate the technical, social and prac- tical histories of specific developments in science and technology; and finally, where possible and desirable, to bring the histories of science and technology into closer con- tact with the philosophy of science. To these ends, each volume will have its own theme and title and will be planned by one or more members of the Advisory Board in consultation with the editor. Although the volumes have specific themes, the series it- self will not be limited to one or even to a few particular areas. Its subjects include any of the sciences, ranging from biology through physics, all aspects of technology, bro- adly construed, as well as historically-engaged philosophy of science or technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Phenomena on the Moon and Mars
    Proc. ESA Annual Meeting on Electrostatics 2010, Paper A1 Electrical Phenomena on the Moon and Mars Gregory T. Delory Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley phone: (1) 510-643-1991 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The Moon and Mars represent intriguing and divergent case studies where nat- ural electrical processes may occur in environments beyond our more familiar terrestrial experience. The windy, Aeolian environment of Mars likely produces substantial electrical activity via the tribo-electrification of individual dust grains that occurs during atmospheric disturbances. While there may be some analogies between atmospheric electrical processes on the Earth and Mars, the highly rarefied, dry Martian atmosphere imposes unique conditions that govern the charging and discharge dynamics of particulates. In contrast to the wind- swept surface of Mars, the Moon is a small airless body whose surface is directly exposed to variable space plasmas and solar irradiation. Measurements during the Apollo missions, to- gether with more recent data from orbital spacecraft, indicate that there are active and dy- namic charging processes occurring on and near the lunar surface. One possible consequence of dynamic lunar electrical activity may be the levitation and perhaps large scale transport of lunar dust. For both the Moon and Mars we only have indirect evidence at best for the exis- tence of electrical activity of any real global consequence. This paper is a brief, semi-tutorial review that discusses the background and history behind these investigations, highlights key ongoing research, and describes future efforts that will help resolve the fundamental, out- standing questions that remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Like Thermodynamics Before Boltzmann. on the Emergence of Einstein’S Distinction Between Constructive and Principle Theories
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Philsci-Archive Like Thermodynamics before Boltzmann. On the Emergence of Einstein’s Distinction between Constructive and Principle Theories Marco Giovanelli Forum Scientiarum — Universität Tübingen, Doblerstrasse 33 72074 Tübingen, Germany [email protected] How must the laws of nature be constructed in order to rule out the possibility of bringing about perpetual motion? Einstein to Solovine, undated In a 1919 article for the Times of London, Einstein declared the relativity theory to be a ‘principle theory,’ like thermodynamics, rather than a ‘constructive theory,’ like the kinetic theory of gases. The present paper attempts to trace back the prehistory of this famous distinction through a systematic overview of Einstein’s repeated use of the relativity theory/thermodynamics analysis after 1905. Einstein initially used the comparison to address a specic objection. In his 1905 relativity paper he had determined the velocity-dependence of the electron’s mass by adapting Newton’s particle dynamics to the relativity principle. However, according to many, this result was not admissible without making some assumption about the structure of the electron. Einstein replied that the relativity theory is similar to thermodynamics. Unlike the usual physical theories, it does not directly try to construct models of specic physical systems; it provides empirically motivated and mathematically formulated criteria for the acceptability of such theories. New theories can be obtained by modifying existing theories valid in limiting case so that they comply with such criteria. Einstein progressively transformed this line of the defense into a positive heuristics.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTING MODERN IDENTITIES Jewish University Students in Germany 1 8 1 5 1 9 1 4
    CONSTRUCTING M O D E R N IDENTITIES CONSTRUCTING MODERN IDENTITIES Jewish University Students in Germany 1 8 1 5 1 9 1 4 Keith H. Pickus WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS DETROIT Copyright © 1999 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201. All material in this work, except as identified below, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/. All material not licensed under a Creative Commons li- cense is all rights reserved. Permission must be obtained from the copyright owner to use this material. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pickus, Keith H., 1959– Constructing modern identities : Jewish university students in Germany, 1815–1914 / Keith H. Pickus. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 978-0-8143-4352-4 (paperback); 978-0-8143-4351-7 (ebook) 1. Jewish college students—Germany—History— 19th century. 2. Jews— Germany—History—1800–1933. 3. Jewish college students—Germany— Societies, etc.— History—19th century. 4. Jews—Germany—Identity. 5. ­Germany—Ethnic relations. I. Title. DS135.G33 1999 378.1'982'9924043—DC21 99-11845 Designer: S. R. Tenenbaum The publication of this volume in a freely accessible digital format has been made possible by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Mellon Foundation through their Humanities Open Book Program. Grateful acknowledgment is made to the Koret Foun- dation for financial support in the publication of this volume. Wayne State University Press thanks the following individuals and institutions for their generous permis- sion to reprint material in this book: Paul Fairbrook; The Leo Baeck Institute; and Stanford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensification of Electrohydrodynamic Flows Using Carbon Nano-Tubes
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Intensification of electrohydrodynamic flows using carbon nano-tubes To cite this article: S M Korobeynikov et al 2020 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1675 012103 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.202.226 on 25/09/2021 at 00:59 TPH-2020 IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1675 (2020) 012103 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1675/1/012103 Intensification of electrohydrodynamic flows using carbon nano-tubes S M Korobeynikov1,2, A V Ridel1,2, D I Karpov1,3, Ya G Prokopenko3 and A L Bychkov1 1 Lavrentyev institute of hydrodynamics of SB RAS, Lavrentyev av., 15, Novosibirsk, 630090 2 Novosibirsk State Technical University, Karl Marx av., 20, Novosibirsk, 630073 3 Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova str., 2, Novosibirsk, 630090 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Study of behaviour of floating up bubbles in the mixture of transformer oil with carbon nanotubes under the action of high electric field was carried out. The possibility of using carbon nanotubes to create hydrodynamic flows in a liquid dielectric at a very low concentration of nanotubes is shown. It is assumed that the mechanism of the formation of flows is the injection of charge from the surface of nanotubes. 1. Introduction The study of partial discharges (PDs) in liquid dielectrics has quite a long history. Despite this it remains a very important field of physics of electrical phenomena in dielectrics. There are two basic factors determining practical significance of these studies. All possible PDs events in dielectric liquids are divided into two primary types.
    [Show full text]