DOCSLIB.ORG

Agriculture and Adaptation to Climate Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agriculture and Adaptation to Climate Change OECD-INEA-FAO Workshop on Agriculture and Adaptation to Climate Change Rome, Italy 23-25 June 2010 Agenda The Italian National Institute of Agricultural Economics (INEA) has kindly offered to host the workshop. The workshop will be held at the following address (please note the recent change in venue!) Hotel Massimo D’Azeglio Via Cavour, 18 00184, Rome Registration: Delegates to the Joint Working Party on Agriculture and the Environment are invited to register via their Delegation to the OECD (EMS system). Other participants, by invitation only, should contact the OECD. There is no cost for registration; however participants are responsible for covering their own expenses. Hotels: For information on hotel rates, please send an e-mail to [email protected] Contacts: OECD, Hsin Huang, [email protected] INEA, Guido Bonati, [email protected] ; mobile +39 338 6247639 FAO, Clemencia Licona Manzur, [email protected] Website for the workshop: www.oecd.org/agriculture/env/climate 1 Background notes to the Agenda Theme of the workshop This workshop will explore the different options available to agriculture in adapting to climate change over a medium to long term perspective (to 2050). The central theme of this workshop is adaptation given that climate change is already occurring and irrespective of future action, the world s already “locked-in” for some climate change1. Governments have a role to play in setting the right policy environment that facilitates agriculture’s adaptation to climate change. There are also links between mitigation2 and adaptation, many of which are positive synergies such as practices that increase soil organic carbon, thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions while at the same time improving the productivity potential of land. In addition, there are also synergies with other environmental goals related to the wider questions of sustainability (e.g. efficient resource use, biodiversity), health (e.g. air and water quality) and economic growth (Green Growth). The workshop will explore how to foster these “win-win” outcomes. The workshop will examine these topics from the viewpoint of both developed and developing countries. As requested by delegations, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has been invited to substantially contribute to this conference. Expected outcome The output of this workshop will be used as an input into the OECD Secretariat’s continuing work on the role that governments can play in supporting (or unintentionally hindering) farmers’ decisions to engage in activities that will improve their capacity to adapt to climate change. Workshop presentations and summary will be posted on the workshop website. 1 Multilateral negotiations under the UNFCCC have set a goal to limit future temperature increase to a 2°C rise above the pre-industrial global average. However, in the absence of an agreement to a substantial “de- carbonization” of the world economy, future temperature increases may significantly exceed this target. 2 Issues mainly related to mitigation will not be directly addressed in this workshop. These may be taken up in a future workshop subject to expressed interest from Delegations. 2 Agenda DAY 1 TIME SESSION Wednesday, 08.30-09.00 Registration 23 June 09:00-09:15 Welcome • prof. Alberto Manelli (INEA) • on. Antonio Buonfiglio, Sub-secretary of the Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies • Felice Assenza, Directorate of International Affairs, Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies • Paolo Ammassari, Directorate of Rural Development, Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies 09:15-10:30 Session 1 : Climate Change and Agriculture: Setting the Scene Chair: Bob MacGregor, Chief, Agriculture and Environment Analysis, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Climate change projections over the medium to long term (2050) and the potential impacts on agriculture, given the most up to date analysis available will be presented by the FAO. Given this context, the agricultural sector will be faced with a number of challenges and opportunities, in particular to increase food production while at the same time meeting other environmental objectives. • Climate change impacts on agriculture (Alexander Müller, Assistant Director-General, Natural Resources Management and Environment Department, FAO) • Agriculture to 2050, challenges and opportunities (Hsin Huang, OECD) • Context of agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in OECD countries (Guido Bonati, INEA) • Objectives of the workshop: designing and implementing adaptation policies in the context of sustainable agriculture and green growth (Wilfrid Legg, OECD) • Discussion 10:30-11.00 Coffee Break 3 (Day 1 continued) 11:00-12:30 Session 2 : Perspectives on Adaptation Chair: Chang-Gil Kim, Team Leader, Korea Rural Economic Institute Climate change has implications for food security, particularly in developing countries. Adaptation to climate change will also imply actions from all participants in the economy. This session will explore the viewpoints of different stakeholders. • Climate change and food security in developing countries (Shivaji Pandey, FAO) • Agri-Food perspective (Edoardo Ferri, Corporate Affairs Director, Monsanto Italy, representing the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD) • Joint Research Centre-European Commission (Simon Kay, Unit Head, Monitoring Agricultural Resources) • Discussion 12:30-14:30 Lunch 14:30-16:00 Session 3 : Approaches to Adaptation and Synergies with Mitigation Chair: Clemencia Licona Manzur, Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department, FAO There are a wide range of adaptation options available. Adaptation actions may also impact other environmental outcomes, such as soil fertility/erosion, fertilizer and pesticide use, nutrient run-off, etc. There are also synergies between adaptation and mitigation in relation to climate change, but possibly trade-offs in other areas. For example, no-till practices can increase soil fertility and result in fewer greenhouse gas emissions, but may require greater use of pesticides. The optimal mix of these various options depends on conditions at the farm level, and it is crucial to have in place an economic environment in which the actions of farmers are aligned with society’s goals to produce a sustainable supply of food while mitigating climate change. • Adaptation options for the farming sector (Nieves Bottomley, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom) • Agricultural practices: adaptation and sustainability, synergies with mitigation (Leslie Lipper, FAO) • CANCELLED: The economics of adaptation to climate change in agriculture (Robert Mendelsohn, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies) • Discussion 4 16:00-16:30 Coffee Break Session 4 : Knowledge Resources to Inform Farmer Adaptation 16:30-18:00 Decisions Chair: Marca Weinberg, Associate Director, Resource and Rural Economics Division, United States Department of Agriculture/Economic Research Service Information is crucial for decision making to adapt to climate change. The role of the government and other organizations in providing relevant, timely information to producers will be explored. Two country examples are presented. • Climate change impacts and adaptation: Insights from ABARE research, (Helal Ahammad, General Manager, Climate Change and Environment, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics) • Knowledge gaps, using agri-environmental indicators (of sustainability) in the context of adaptation to climate change in the Canadian Prairies, (Elaine Wheaton, Distinguished Scientist, Saskatchewan Research Council, Canada) • Discussion Opener: Achim Ilzhöfer, Project Manager, Bayer AG, representing the Business Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD • Discussion (End of the first day) 5 DAY 2 TIME SESSION Thursday, Session 5 : Policies and adaptation to climate change -examples of 09:00-10:30 24 June insurance Chair: Antonella Pontrandolfi , National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy Following up on the discussion in Session 3, this session will explore how insurance can be part of the strategy for adapting to climate change. Agricultural insurance is an important policy option that is already implemented in a number of countries. • Agricultural insurance and adaptation to climate change (Andrea Cattaneo, OECD) • Agricultural insurance in Italy (Giuseppe Pennucci, Director of the Office of Crisis Management in Agriculture, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali) • Agricultural insurance in Spain ( Angel Barbero Martin, Technical Advisor, Cabinet of the Vice Ministry of Rural and Water Affairs) • Risk management and agricultural insurance in the United States (Thomas Worth, Senior Actuary, Risk Management Agency, USDA) • Discussion 10:30-11:00 Coffee Break Session 6 : Policies and adaptation to climate change -country 11:00-12:30 experiences Chair: Jeremy Eppel, Deputy Director, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom Country presentations on policies to address climate change concerns in agriculture, in particular the current and future approaches to adaptation, lessons learned, etc. Please confirm with the Secretariat if you wish to make a formal presentation. • Integrating adaptation within national and sectoral policies (Shardul Agrawala, OECD) • Agroscenari: scenarios on adaptation of agriculture to climate change in Italy (Domenico Vento, CRA-CMA Italy) • Discussion 6 (Day 2 continued) 12:30-14:30 Lunch 14:30-23:30 Afternoon Fieldtrip
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Prosperity Through Modern Rural Policy Competitiveness and Well-Being in Rural Regions
    National Prosperity through Modern Rural Policy Competitiveness and well-being in rural regions 10th OECD Rural Development Conference 19-21 May 2015 Memphis, Tennessee, United States Who's who? www.oecd.org/regional/ Copyright and Credits Andrea Zucker / Copyright © Memphis Convention & Visitors Bureau 2011 All Rights Reserved. OECD Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate WHO’S WHO Conference hosts Tom Vilsack was appointed by President Barack Obama as the 30th Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and sworn into office on January 21, 2009. As Secretary of Agriculture, Vilsack is working hard to strengthen the American agricultural economy, to revitalize rural communities, to protect and conserve our natural resources, and to provide a safe, sufficient and nutritious food supply for the American people. Because USDA’s work affects every American every day, we are proud to be the ‘Every Way, Every Day’ USDA. As Agriculture Secretary, Vilsack has worked to implement President Obama’s ambitious agenda to turn around the economy and put Americans back to work. USDA has supported struggling farmers and ranchers, provided food aid to 1 in 4 Americans, and worked to create jobs and build a foundation for future economic Thomas J. Vilsack growth – especially in rural America. Secretary of Agriculture United States Mari Kiviniemi took up her duties as OECD Deputy Secretary-General on 25 August 2014. Her role consists of sharing her extensive experience to help increase the impact and relevance of OECD work and to contribute to the public policy challenges of promoting inclusive growth, jobs, equality and trust. She is responsible for the strategic oversight of the OECD’s work on Efficient and Effective Governance; Territorial Development; Trade and Agriculture, as well as Statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • M.A. Economics Session 2013-14 Onwards
    DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA, INDORE M.A. Economics Session 2012-13 onwards Semester-IV Compulsory Paper Paper - I Indian Economic Policy 85+15 CCE Paper - II Economics of Growth 85+15 CCE Paper - III Economics of Insurance 85+15 CCE Optional Paper (Any One ) Group . A 2. Mathematical Economics 85+15 CCE Group . B 2. Industrial Economics . 85+15 CCE Group . C 2. Rural Development Poverty 85+15 CCE Group . D 2. Gender Economics. 85+15 CCE Project 100 uksV %&mijksDr lewg A,B,C,D esa ls Nk= ogh iz’ui= ysaxs tks dze r`rh; lsesLVj esa fy;k gS A tSls r`rh; lsesLVj esa A iz’ui= ysus ij prqFkZ lse es Hkh mijksDr esa ls A] r`rh; lsesLVj esa B ysus ij prqFkZ lsesLVj esa Hkh mijksDr esa ls B, r`rh; lsesLVj esa C ysus ij prqFkZ lsesLVj esa Hkh C rFkk r`rh; lsesLVj esa D ysus ij prqFkZ lsesLVj esa Hkh D iz’ui= gh ysuk gksxk A Semester-IV Paper - I Indian Economic Policy 85+15 CCE Unit I Frame Work of Indian Economy 1- Economic Policy : An Introduction. 2- Trend and Structure of National Income. 3- Demographic Features and Indicators of Development Unit II Development Strategies In India. 1- Planning in India : Objectives, Strategies and Evaluation. 2- Economic Reforms in India. 3- Poverty and Inequality : Policy Implications Unit III Sectoral Performance – 1 1- Agricultural Growth, Productivity Trend and Crop Patterns. 2- Industrial Sector in Pre-reform period 3- Industrial Sector in post-reform Period wirh Emphasis on Small Scale Sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Economics Collection Development Policy
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Collection Development Policies -- UNL Libraries Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 12-2009 Agricultural Economics Collection Development Policy Rebecca Bernthal University of Nebraska at Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/librarycolldev Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Bernthal, Rebecca, "Agricultural Economics Collection Development Policy" (2009). Collection Development Policies -- UNL Libraries. 3. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/librarycolldev/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collection Development Policies -- UNL Libraries by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Agricultural Economics CD Policy 2009 Agricultural Economics Collection Development Policy University Libraries, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Rebecca Bernthal, Liaison Librarian, December, 2009 Approved: CDC, January 6, 2010 I. GENERAL ACADEMIC PROGRAM INFORMATION The Agricultural Economics Department is part of the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources (IANR) and the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (CASNR). The faculty has appointments in the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (CASNR), the Agricultural Research Division (ARD), and/or the Cooperative Extension Division (CED). The Department was established in 1909 as the Department of Agronomy and Farm Management. In 1911 it was renamed as the Department of Farm Management and then in 1919 became the Department of Rural Economics. Since 1949 the Department has been known as the Department of Agricultural Economics. By 1920 the Department offered 13 courses for undergraduates and graduate students.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America: Total Factor Productivity and Its Components
    Latin America: Total factor productivity and its components Jair Andrade Araujo, Débora Gaspar Feitosa and Almir Bittencourt da Silva ABSTRACT This article applies the stochastic-frontier model to examine total factor productivity (TFP) and its components in Latin America between 1960 and 2010. The likelihood-ratio test shows that, for a selection of Latin American countries over the 50 years analysed, the macroeconomic variables of technical inefficiency included in the model generally have a significant effect; and they allow for a better understanding of technical inefficiency throughout the region. The key variables explaining technical inefficiency in the selected countries are public expenditure and the inflation rate; and there is also an inverse relation between technical inefficiency and the extent to which local prices diverge from purchasing power parity. KEYWORDS Productivity, measurement, mathematical analysis, econometric models, Latin America JEL CLASSIFICATION O47, O54, O57 AUTHORS Jair Andrade Araujo has a Ph.D. in Economics and is a Professor on the Masters Course in Rural Economics (maer) of the Federal University of Ceará (ufc), Brazil. [email protected] Débora Gaspar Feitosa has a Ph.D. in Economics and is a Professor on the Economic Sciences and Finance Courses of the Federal University of Ceará (ufc), Brazil. [email protected] Almir Bittencourt da Silva has a Ph.D. in Economics and is a Professor on the Postgraduate Course in Economics (caen) of the Federal University of Ceará (ufc), Brazil. [email protected] 52 CEPAL REVIEW 114 • DECEMBER 2014 I Introduction Using the concept of total factor productivity (tfp), of this approach is that allows tfp to be broken down quantified using the Cobb-Douglas production function, into components that characterize the general production Solow (1957) introduced the measurement of the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Discrimination This Page Intentionally Left Blank Poverty and Discrimination
    A PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS E-BOOK Poverty andDiscrimination Kevin Lang Poverty and Discrimination This page intentionally left blank Poverty and Discrimination KEVIN LANG PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Princeton and Oxford Copyright © 2007 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lang, Kevin. Poverty and discrimination / Kevin Lang. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-691-11954-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-691-11954-6 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Poverty—United States. 2. Economic policy—United States. 3. Social policy— United States. 4. Public welfare—United States. 5. Discrimination—United States. I. Title. HC110.P6L36 2007 362.5′5610973—dc22 2006020888 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Adobe Garamond, Scala Sans, ITC Stone Sans, and ITC Stone Serif by Princeton Editorial Associates, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ pup.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 10987654321 contents Acknowledgments xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1. The Content of This Book 2 2. Recent Developments in the Study of Poverty and Discrimination 4 3. The Object of This Book 8 4. Why Do Policy Analysts Disagree? The Limits of Statistical Arguments 10 5. Why Do Policy Analysts Disagree? The Role of Values 12 6. A Case Study: Retention in Grade 13 7. Concluding Remarks 17 8. Further Reading 18 9. Questions for Discussion 18 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Agriculture and Economics Management, Investment, Policy, and Methodology
    Beyond Agriculture and Economics Management, Investment, Policy, and Methodology A. Allan Schmid, editor Michigan State University Press I East Lansing • Selected Bibliography of Glenn L. Johnson PART I. BOOKS (WRITIEN OR EDITED) AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOOKS Farm Management Analysis. Coauthored with L.A. Bradford. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1953. "The Interstate Cooperative Research Project on Decision-Making in Farm Management," Proceedings of Conference on Values and Decision-Making in Home Management, Department of Home Management and Child Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing, July 1955, 36-52. U.S. Agriculture - Perspectives and Prospects. The American Assembly, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 1955. Chapter 2, "Agriculture's Technological Revolution." Farm Management in the West, Problems in Resource Use, Conference Proceedings. Corvallis, Ore.: F.M.R.C., January 1956. Authored paper entitled" A Critical Evaluation of Fertilizer Research." Economic and Technical Analysis of Fertilizer Innovations and Resource Use. Edited by E.L. Baum. Ames: Iowa State College Press, 1956. Authored Chapter 19, "Planning Agronomic-Economic Research in View of Results to Date," Chapter 22, "The Role of Management in Planning Farms for Optimum Fertilizer Use," Chapter 29, "Some Contributions of Microanalysis to Agricultural Policy," and coauthored with L.S. Robertson and J.F. Davis, Chapter 20, "Problems Involved in the Integration of Argronomic and Economic Methodologies in Economic Optima Experiments." Resource Productivity, Returns to Scale and Farm Size. Edited by E.O. Heady, et al. Ames: Iowa State College Press, 1956. Chapter 2, "Problems in Studying Resource Productivity and Size of Business Arising from Managerial Processes," Chapter 3, '''Institutional Considerations Relevant in Studying Resource Productivity and Size of Business," and Chapter 9, "Classification and Accounting Problems in Fitting Production Functions to Farm Record and Survey Data." Methodological Proceduresin the EconomicAnalysis of Fertilizer Use Data.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfinance Revolution
    23250 v 1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Microfinance Revolution Sustainable Finance for the Poor © 2001 by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20433 USA All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing May 2001 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this book are entirely those of the author and should not be attributed in any manner to Open Society Institute or to the World Bank, its affiliated organizations, or members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Robinson, Marguerite S., 1935– The microfinance revolution: sustainable finance for the poor / Marguerite S. Robinson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0–8213–4524–9 1. Microfinance—Developing countries. 2. Microfinance. 3. Financial institutions—Develop- ing countries. 4. Poor—Developing countries. I. Title. HG178.33.D44 R63 2001 332.2—dc21 2001026146 Edited, designed, and laid out by Communications Development Incorporated, Washington, D.C. and San Francisco, California The Microfinance Revolution Sustainable Finance for the Poor Lessons from Indonesia The Emerging Industry Marguerite S. Robinson The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Open Society Institute, New York Praise for The Microfinance Revolution “Dr. Robinson has written a magnificent work that provides a jolt of energy as well as wise guidance to the fledgling microfinance industry.This book will quickly become re- quired reading for students and professionals in and around the microfinance industry, for donors and government agencies, and for investors.This is also the first book that, through thoughtful analysis, vivid images, and extensive research, will beckon commer- cial bankers and the rest of the ‘real world’ to sit up and take interest in microfinance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Culture of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives
    The Economic Culture of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives Julie A. Hogeland disciplining the economic system, “cooperatives kept the other firm honest.” Julie A. Hogeland is an agricultural economist in Offering a farmer-owned alternative to offset the Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture. market power of monopolists who threatened farmer welfare is also an accepted cooperative role. To reach this point, cooperatives risked becoming indistin- Abstract guishable from those they sought to challenge, as demonstrated by the cooperative experience in the in- Two contesting philosophies that shaped cooperative dustrializing pork industry during the late 1990s. culture during the past 70 years are explored, Edwin Indeed, by the early 21st century, cooperatives were Nourse’s populist concept of cooperatives as a “competitive including others besides farmers as stakeholders in the yardstick” restoring competition to the marketplace on cooperative system because farmer investment alone behalf of farmers and Aaron Sapiro’s philosophy that coop- could no longer provide the capital-intensive produc- eratives should be businesslike, purely economic and prefer- tion and distribution systems needed by contempo- ably large-scale organizations for maximum effectiveness rary farmers. Adversarial attitudes were cast aside as bargaining with processors. As cooperatives expanded over retail buyers and consumers began to be seen less as the 20th century, the tension between these two philosophies driving down food prices than as partners accom- set into motion cultural constraints on cooperative growth plishing the task of getting farmers’ product marketed that came to a crisis point with the industrialization of the or providing market access. pork industry. This brought rapprochement with businesses This article traces how the cooperative philosophies cooperatives had formerly defined themselves in opposition to, initiated in the early 20th century created contradictions resulting in a new phase of cooperative identity, the “value- for later cooperative development.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural America Vol. 17 Issue 4
    Rural America Contents USDA/ERS Volume 17, Issue 4 Winter 2002 Feature Articles 2 Understanding Rural Population Loss David A. McGranahan and Calvin L. Beale Douglas E. Bowers, Executive Editor 12 Nonmetro Recreation Counties: Their Identification Carolyn Rogers, Associate Editor and Rapid Growth Dale Simms, Managing Editor Kenneth M. Johnson and Calvin L. Beale Victor B. Phillips, Jr., Layout and Design 20 Federal Funding in the Delta Richard J. Reeder and Samuel D. Calhoun Rural America (ISSN 0271-2171) is published 31 four times per year by USDA’s Economic Federal Funding in Appalachia and Its Three Subregions Faqir S. Bagi, Richard J. Reeder, and Samuel D. Calhoun Research Service. 38 Can Rural Employment Benefit From Changing Labor Rural America welcomes letters to the Skills in U.S. Processed Food Trade? editor. Address editorial correspondence and Gerald Schluter and Chinkook Lee inquiries to the Executive Editor, Rural 44 Economic Impact of Water/Sewer Facilities on Rural America, ERS-FRED, Room 2171, 1800 M and Urban Communities Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-5831; Faqir S. Bagi or call 202-694-5398. 50 Resource Conservation and Development Program Reaches a Milestone Contents of this magazine may be reprinted Dwight M. Gadsby without permission, but the editors would appreciate acknowledgment of such use and 55 Who Owns the Land? Agricultural Land Ownership an advance copy of the material to be reprint- by Race/Ethnicity ed. Opinions expressed within do not neces- Jess Gilbert, Spencer D. Wood, and Gwen Sharp sarily represent the policies of USDA. Use of 63 How Does Growing U.S.-China Trade Affect commercial and trade names does not imply Rural America? approval or constitute endorsement by USDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Economic Competitiveness Analysis
    Community Economic Competitiveness Analysis Timm Kroeger Conservation Economics Program, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington DC 20036 June 2008 National Council for Science and the Environment 2006 Wildlife Habitat Policy Research Program Project Topic 1H: Development of an Operational Benefits Estimation Tool for the U.S. Outline Executive summary The role of natural amenities in regional development Historical perspective on the view of natural amenities of drivers of economic development Do jobs follow people or do people follow jobs? Generalizing the impacts of protected lands on community economic competitiveness Selected literature findings on the role of natural amenities with a focus on protected lands Conclusion Literature cited Appendix: Brief description of findings of the most relevant studies examining the economic impacts of protected lands Table A-1: Overview of studies analyzing the impact of amenities on income, output, employment and population i Executive summary We review the empirical and theoretical literature on the impacts of natural amenities on county or state-level income and output, employment, population, and per-capita income. The empirical studies reviewed employ both statistical modeling using empirical information and surveys to analyze the impact of natural amenities. The results of these studies clearly support the hypothesis that amenities positively impact output and employment and population growth and aggregate output in rural areas. In particular, if we limit the analysis to studies that assess the impact of protected lands, excluding studies that employ broader amenity measures such as climate or topography or man-made recreation facilities, none of the studies reviewed discovered a negative association between protected lands and income, output, employment or population.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations; Economic Chang
    DOCUMENT ILESI ED 133 11e RC 009 592 KUTHOD Nicholson, Der 1 The Structure ot th p Household Economy in Rural North Norway. PUD DATE Aug -76 NO7 25p.;P per pre ented at the world Congress of Rural Sociology (4th, Torun, Polan( August 1976) EDES PRIC 1F-$0.83 HC-$1.67 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Agricultural laborers; Consumer Econo ics; * velo Nations; Economic Chang; *Economics; Employment; Family (Sociological Unit); larmers; Foreign Countries; Human Geography; Income; Money Management; *Multiple Employment; *Occupational Surveys; Productivity; *Rural Economics; Rural Population; Socioeconomic Influences II NTIFI RS *Norway; World Congress of Rural soci gy (4th) ABSTRACT In No way one of the w rld's most developed nations, a co__iderable proportion of households Still obtain income from more than one source. From the time rural North Norway was settle households have combined production for sale with production for their own consumption and have exploited various resources to do so. The household's requirements determine how its resources are to be allocated and the relative amounts a income it obtains in cash and kind from each source. Household priorities are thus translated into a pattern of consumption, defined broadly to include free time. The strategy adopted for obtaining an income of not only the required size, but also of the required composition, is determined by this desired consumption pattern. In an economic system such as this, concepts such as job or occupat on are limited in their usefulness. The activities performed in ord r to earn a living.cannot be defined az jobs, or even part-time jobs Of greater importance for the composition of the income spectrum ls the "Technological and Administrative Task Environment" (TATE) which is defined as "a social constellation within which any household decision-maker technically acts".
    [Show full text]
  • BA in Rural Studies
    DEPARTMENT OF RURAL STUDIES (PALLI CHARCHA KENDRA) SYLLABUS FOR THREE YEARS (SIX SEMESTERS)- BACHELOR OF RURAL STUDIES (BRS) (Hons.) Intake capacity and Eligibility of Admisssion This is an undergraduate course for 3 years (six semesters) to receive Honours Degree of Bachelor of Rural Studies (BRS). Target groups: This programme is primarily meant for all those who would like to acquire higher education and are interested to work in the field of rural studies. Students completing these courses would not only be self-sufficient but will be well equipped to compete with other students completing courses in various disciplines of Development Studies. Total intake of the students per year: BRS--- 40. Eligibility for the entry into the undergraduate level—Passed Higher Secondary level examination with 50% marks. Ordinance The evaluation process is divided into two parts. The first part-consists of Internal Evaluation (IE) and the second part consists of the Semester End Examination. The division of marks between the two shall be as per the University rules. The evaluation process shall follow the norm that the faculty, who teaches the course, shall conduct the Internal Evaluation (IE). The concerned faculty shall be accountable for transparency and reliability of the entire evaluation of the student in the concerned Course. Each theoretical paper, carrying 75 marks, will be examined through internal assessment and final semester end examination in the ratio 15:60. Internal assessment will be based on specific predetermined objective criteria (like written test, assignment etc.). There shall be at least two internal assessment tests in each theoretical group. Final examination will be based on the question paper set by the internal teachers.
    [Show full text]