DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 4 BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS by GEOGRAPHY (INCLUDING SELECTED UNDER 500,000 POPULATION)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table 4 BUILT-UP URBAN AREAS BY GEOGRAPHY (INCLUDING SELECTED UNDER 500,000 POPULATION) Urban Areas 500,000 & Over Population Land Area Population Density Source: Population Square Square Per Square Per Square Pop.Area Latest Base Base Year Rank Geography Urban Area Estimate Miles Kilometers Mile Kilometer (See Note) Estimate Year Population Estimate Afghanistan Herat 475,000 19 49 25,000 9,700 C:B 2016 2015 460,000 121 Afghanistan Kabul 3,650,000 100 259 36,500 14,100 C:B 2016 2016 3,650,000 967 Afghanistan Kandahar 525,000 25 65 21,000 8,100 C:B 2016 2015 510,000 Albania Berat 40,000 2 6 18,200 7,000 C:B 2010 2010 40,000 Albania Fier 50,000 6 14 9,000 3,500 C:B 2010 2010 50,000 790 Albania Tirana 635,000 33 85 19,200 7,400 C:B 2016 2010 560,000 116 Algeria Algiers 3,675,000 170 440 21,600 8,300 C:B 2016 2008 3,250,000 858 Algeria Constantine 590,000 46 119 12,800 5,000 C:B 2016 2008 590,000 494 Algeria Wahran 1,015,000 63 163 16,100 6,200 C:B 2016 2008 920,000 928 Angola Benguela 555,000 40 104 13,900 5,400 C:B 2016 2014 500,000 858 Angola Huambo 590,000 50 130 11,800 4,600 C:B 2016 2014 530,000 Angola Kuito 335,000 32 83 10,500 4,000 C:B 2016 2014 300,000 Angola Lobito 290,000 33 85 8,800 3,400 C:B 2016 2014 260,000 53 Angola Luanda 6,955,000 380 984 18,300 7,100 C:B 2016 2014 6,400,000 814 Angola Lubango 615,000 84 218 7,300 2,800 C:B 2016 2014 550,000 21 Argentina Buenos Aires 14,280,000 1,035 2,681 13,800 5,300 C:B 2016 2010 13,370,000 Argentina Comodora Rivadavia 175,000 18 47 9,700 3,800 C:B 2010 2010 175,000 317 Argentina Cordoba 1,595,000 140 363 11,400 4,400 C:B 2016 2010 1,532,000 610 Argentina La Plata 815,000 88 228 9,300 3,600 C:B 2016 2010 750,000 811 Argentina Mar del Plata 620,000 42 109 14,800 5,700 C:B 2016 2010 575,000 501 Argentina Mendoza 1,010,000 95 246 10,600 4,100 C:B 2016 2010 942,000 371 Argentina Rosario 1,355,000 90 233 15,100 5,800 C:B 2016 2010 1,264,000 903 Argentina Salta 570,000 42 109 13,600 5,200 C:B 2016 2010 525,000 Argentina San Juan 480,000 45 117 10,700 4,100 C:B 2016 2010 450,000 872 Argentina Santa Fe 580,000 45 117 12,900 5,000 C:B 2016 2010 500,000 545 Argentina Tucuman 920,000 44 114 20,900 8,100 D:B 2016 2015 910,000 377 Armenia Yerevan 1,325,000 145 376 9,100 3,500 C:B 2016 2011 1,350,000 435 Australia Adelaide, SA 1,150,000 329 852 3,400 1,300 A:A 2016 2011 1,104,000 Australia Albany, WA 25,000 32 82 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 27,000 Australia Albury, NSW-VIC 75,000 45 116 1,700 700 A:A 2011 2011 77,000 Australia Alice Springs, NT 25,000 19 49 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 24,000 Australia Ballarat, VIC 85,000 44 114 2,000 800 A:A 2011 2011 86,000 Australia Bathurst, NSW 30,000 20 53 1,500 600 A:A 2011 2011 31,000 Australia Bendigo, VIC 85,000 56 146 1,500 600 A:A 2011 2011 83,000 244 Australia Brisbane, QLD 2,030,000 761 1,972 2,500 1,000 A:A 2016 2011 1,874,000 Australia Broken Hill, NSW 20,000 10 26 1,800 700 A:A 2011 2011 18,000 Australia Bunbury, WA 65,000 45 116 1,400 600 A:A 2011 2011 64,000 Australia Bundaberg, QLD 50,000 40 104 1,200 500 A:A 2011 2011 50,000 Australia Cairns, QLD 135,000 49 127 2,700 1,100 A:A 2011 2011 134,000 Australia Canberra, ACT-NSW 420,000 182 472 2,100 800 A:A 2016 2011 382,000 Australia Central Coast, NSW 300,000 155 401 1,900 700 A:A 2011 2011 298,000 Australia Coffs Harbour, NSW 45,000 30 78 1,500 600 A:A 2011 2011 46,000 Australia Darwin, NT 75,000 83 216 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 73,000 Australia Devonport, TAS 25,000 11 28 2,100 800 A:A 2011 2011 23,000 Australia Dubbo, NSW 30,000 37 97 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 32,000 Australia Esperance, WA 10,000 12 30 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 10,000 Australia Gawler, SA 25,000 17 43 1,400 600 A:A 2011 2011 24,000 Australia Geelong, VIC 145,000 44 115 3,200 1,300 A:A 2011 2011 144,000 Australia Geraldton, WA 30,000 24 63 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 31,000 Australia Gladstone, QLD 30,000 37 96 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 32,000 830 Australia Gold Coast, QLD-NSW 605,000 235 609 2,300 900 A:A 2016 2011 534,000 Australia Goulburn, NSW 20,000 25 65 900 300 A:A 2011 2011 22,000 Australia Hervey Bay, QLD 50,000 36 93 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 48,000 Australia Hobart, TAS 170,000 104 269 1,600 600 A:A 2011 2011 171,000 Australia Kalgoorlie, WA 30,000 24 63 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 31,000 Australia Launceston, TAS 75,000 37 95 2,000 800 A:A 2011 2011 74,000 Australia Lismore, NSW 25,000 15 40 1,700 700 A:A 2011 2011 27,000 Australia Lithgow, NSW 10,000 9 24 1,200 500 A:A 2011 2011 11,000 Australia Mackay, QLD 75,000 49 126 1,500 600 A:A 2011 2011 74,000 Australia Maitland, NSW 65,000 51 131 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 67,000 102 Australia Melbourne, VIC 3,955,000 982 2,543 3,800 1,500 A:A 2016 2011 3,708,000 Australia Melton, VIC 35,000 21 55 1,700 700 A:A 2011 2011 36,000 Australia Mildura, VIC-NSW 35,000 19 48 1,800 700 A:A 2011 2011 33,000 Australia Mount Gambier, SA 25,000 10 27 2,400 900 A:A 2011 2011 25,000 Australia Newcastle, NSW 325,000 113 292 2,700 1,100 A:A 2016 2011 308,000 Australia Nowra, NSW 30,000 14 36 2,000 800 A:A 2011 2011 28,000 Australia Orange, NSW 35,000 25 64 1,400 500 A:A 2011 2011 35,000 275 Australia Perth, WA 1,785,000 605 1,566 2,700 1,000 A:A 2016 2011 1,628,000 Australia Port Augusta, SA 15,000 6 15 2,600 1,000 A:B 2011 2011 13,000 Australia Port Maquarie, NSW 40,000 17 45 2,400 900 A:A 2011 2011 42,000 Australia Rockhampton, QLD 60,000 37 95 1,700 700 A:A 2011 2011 62,000 Australia Shepparton, VIC 40,000 27 70 1,400 600 A:A 2011 2011 39,000 Australia Sunbury, VIC 35,000 11 29 2,900 1,100 A:A 2011 2011 33,000 Australia Sunshine Coast, QLD 235,000 105 273 2,000 800 A:A 2016 2011 209,000 100 Australia Sydney, NSW 4,070,000 786 2,037 5,000 1,900 A:A 2016 2011 3,908,000 Australia Tamworth, NSW 35,000 28 72 1,300 500 A:A 2011 2011 36,000 Australia Toowoomba, QLD 95,000 46 119 2,100 800 A:A 2011 2011 97,000 Australia Townsville, QLD 160,000 98 253 1,600 600 A:A 2011 2011 158,000 Australia Wagga Wagga, NSW 45,000 26 67 1,800 700 A:A 2011 2011 47,000 Australia Warambool, VIC 30,000 17 43 1,700 700 A:A 2011 2011 29,000 Australia Warrangata, VIC 15,000 14 36 1,200 500 A:A 2011 2011 17,000 Australia Whyalla, SA 20,000 8 20 2,600 1,000 A:B 2011 2011 21,000 Australia Wollongong, NSW 245,000 85 219 2,900 1,100 A:A 2011 2011 246,000 Austria Graz 300,000 26 67 11,500 4,500 C:B 2010 2010 300,000 Austria Linz 260,000 40 104 6,500 2,500 C:B 2012 2012 260,000 Austria Salzburg 275,000 23 60 12,000 4,600 C:B 2010 2010 275,000 278 Austria Vienna 1,775,000 175 453 10,100 3,900 C:B 2016 2010 1,710,000 171 Azerbaijan Baku 2,725,000 435 1,127 6,300 2,400 C:B 2016 2009 2,300,000 Azerbaijan Gäncä 325,000 55 142 5,900 2,300 D:B 2016 2015 324,000 Azerbaijan Sumquayit 335,000 35 91 9,600 3,700 D:B 2016 2015 330,000 Bahamas Nassau 240,000 63 163 3,800 1,500 C:B 2010 2010 240,000 355 Bahrain Al-Manamah 1,410,000 150 389 9,400 3,600 C:B 2016 2011 1,100,000 865 Bangladesh Bogra 585,000 15 39 39,000 15,100 D:B 2016 2015 550,000 140 Bangladesh Chittagong 3,250,000 43 111 75,600 29,200 C:B 2016 2011 2,900,000 16 Bangladesh Dhaka 16,235,000 142 368 114,300 44,100 C:B 2016 2011 13,600,000 485 Bangladesh Khulna 1,030,000 27 70 38,100 14,700 D:B 2016 2015 1,020,000 934 Bangladesh Rajshahi 550,000 12 31 45,800 17,700 C:B 2016 2011 500,000 794 Bangladesh Sylhet 630,000 19 49 33,200 12,800 C:B 2016 2011 500,000 Belarus Gomel 480,000 49 127 9,800 3,800 D:B 2016 2015 480,000 255 Belarus Minsk 1,980,000 165 427 12,000 4,600 C:B 2016 2011 1,925,000 494 Belgium Antwerp 1,015,000 245 635 4,100 1,600 C:B 2016 2011 990,000 238 Belgium Brussels 2,105,000 310 803 6,800 2,600 C:B 2016 2011 2,025,000 Belgium Ghent 370,000 75 194 4,900 1,900 C:B 2016 2005 350,000 921 Belgium Liege 560,000 110 285 5,100 2,000 C:B 2016 2010 550,000 412 Benin Cotonou 1,205,000 80 207 15,100 5,800 W:B 2016 2010 1,155,000 1017 Benin Porto Novo 500,000 39 101 12,800 5,000 W:B 2016 2010 477,000 Bermuda Hamilton 60,000 19 50 3,100 1,200 C:B 2016 2001 60,000 Bhutan Thimphu 80,000 2 5 40,000 15,400 C:B 2005 2005 80,000 390 Bolivia Cochabamba 1,275,000 98 254 13,000 5,000 C:B 2016 2011 1,100,000 258 Bolivia La Paz 1,935,000 105 272 18,400 7,100 C:B 2016 2011 1,800,000 228 Bolivia Santa Cruz 2,190,000 230 596 9,500 3,700 C:B 2016 2011 1,815,000 Bolivia Sucre 415,000 17 44 24,400 9,400 C:B 2016 2011 340,000 Bosnia & Herzegovina Sarajevo 415,000 46 119 9,000 3,500 C:B 2016 2013 425,000 Botswana Gaborone 430,000 85 220 5,100 2,000 C:B 2016 2011 400,000 624 Brazil Aracaju 790,000 45 117 17,600 6,800 C:B 2016 2010 710,000 247 Brazil Belem 2,005,000 100 259 20,100 7,700 C:B 2016 2010 1,850,000 90 Brazil Belo Horizonte 4,560,000 420 1,088 10,900 4,200 C:B 2016 2010 4,300,000 707 Brazil Blumenau 710,000 40 104 17,800 6,900 C:B 2016 2010 650,000 Brazil Boa Vista 340,000 43 111 7,900 3,100 D:B 2016 2015 330,000 186 Brazil Brasilia 2,585,000 260 673 9,900 3,800 C:B 2016 2010 2,300,000 175 Brazil Campinas 2,685,000 360 932 7,500 2,900 C:B 2016 2010 2,450,000 591 Brazil Campo Grande 845,000 81 210 10,400 4,000 C:B 2016 2010 775,000 630 Brazil Cuiaba 780,000 125 324 6,200 2,400 C:B 2016 2010 725,000 148 Brazil Curitiba 3,160,000 325 842 9,700 3,800 C:B 2016 2010 2,825,000 892 Brazil Feira de Santana 575,000 30 78 19,200 7,400 C:B 2016 2010 525,000 534 Brazil Florianopolis 940,000 70 181 13,400 5,200 C:B 2016 2010 800,000 131 Brazil Fortaleza 3,460,000 200 518 17,300 6,700 C:B 2016 2010 3,125,000 231 Brazil Goiania 2,155,000 270 699 8,000 3,100 C:B 2016 2010 1,925,000 470 Brazil Joao Pessoa 1,070,000 75 194 14,300 5,500 C:B 2016 2010 975,000 934 Brazil Joinville 550,000 70 181 7,900 3,000 C:B 2016 2010 500,000
Recommended publications
  • 121 Residential Properties in Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire 1 Executive Summary Milton Keynes

    121 Residential Properties in Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire 1 Executive Summary Milton Keynes

    121 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN BEDFORDSHIRE AND BUCKINGHAMSHIRE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MILTON KEYNES The portfolio comprises four modern freehold residential assets. Milton Keynes is a ‘new town’ built in the 1960s. The area Geographically, the properties are each connected to the major incorporates the existing towns of Bletchley, Wolverton and economic centres of Luton or Milton Keynes as well as being Stony Stratford. The population in the 2011 Census totalled commutable to Central London. 248,800. The government have pledged to double the population by 2026. Milton Keynes is one of the more successful (per capita) The current owners have invested heavily in the assets economies in the South East. It has a gross value added per during their ownership including a high specification rolling capita index 47% higher than the national average. The retail refurbishment of units, which is ongoing. sector is the largest contributor to employment. The portfolio offers an incoming investor the opportunity KEY FACTS: to acquire a quality portfolio of scale benefitting from • Britain’s fastest growing city by population. The population management efficiencies, low running costs, a low entry price has grown 18% between 2004 and 2013, the job base having point into the residential market, an attractive initial yield and expanded by 24,400 (16%) over the same period. excellent reversionary yield potential. • Milton Keynes is home to some of the largest concentrations PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND PERFORMANCE of North American, German, Japanese and Taiwanese firms in the UK. No. of Assets 4 No. of Units 121 • Approximately 18% of the population can be found in the PRS, Floor area (sq m / sq ft) 5,068 / 54,556 with growth of 133% since 2001.
  • WELCOME to the LONDON TRAINING CENTER KEY FACTS 24/7 365 Days Operation Per Year

    WELCOME to the LONDON TRAINING CENTER KEY FACTS 24/7 365 Days Operation Per Year

    WELCOME TO THE LONDON TRAINING CENTER KEY FACTS 24/7 365 days operation per year WELCOME TO YOUR NEW HOME 8 7 Certified $100M+ FOR TRAINING. Level D Full State-of-the-art To CAA and EASA Investment in pilot Flight Simulators classrooms standards training The recently opened London Training Center, is a $100+ million investment focused on delivering the highest quality of pilot training in a purpose built state-of-the-art facility. We have prepared this welcome pack about the London Training Center in advance of your visit, so you can familiarize yourself with the facilities beforehand. To best prepared for your training. ABOUT L3HARRIS L3Harris are the global experts in providing a comprehensive range of training courses and support services, including training systems hardware and software for pilots and airlines. L3Harris delivers training matched to airline needs through a long history of successful relationships with global airlines. Our connected expertize enhances our ability to provide you with the very best pilot training. We have training centers close to major airports and a global network of academies, making training accessible for candidates and airlines. What’s more, we ensure training is truly reflective of the unique “Airlines rely on their pilots corporate cultures of our airline customers across the world. expertize - so the flexibility and Technology that takes you closer to reality Our training systems take tomorrow’s pilots and crew to near-reality, combining unrivaled simulated experiences with our in-depth knowledge of aircraft and the human behavior that governs them. From reactivity of our training is key to tablet-based tuition to Full Flight Simulators, we’re equipped to exceed training requirements.
  • Surrey Hotel Futures Report

    Surrey Hotel Futures Report

    SURREY HOTEL FUTURES FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Surrey County Council June 2015 Surrey Hotel Futures Study 2015 __________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. i 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Study Background and Brief................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Scope of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 4 2. NATIONAL HOTEL TRENDS ................................................................................................................ 6 2.1. National Hotel Performance Trends ...................................................................................... 6 2.2. National Hotel Development Trends .................................................................................... 8 3. SURREY HOTEL SUPPLY ..................................................................................................................... 19 3.1. Current Surrey Hotel Supply .................................................................................................
  • 21 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    21 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    21 bus time schedule & line map 21 Crawley - Dorking - Leatherhead - Epsom View In Website Mode The 21 bus line (Crawley - Dorking - Leatherhead - Epsom) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Box Hill: 7:08 PM (2) Crawley: 6:51 AM - 5:15 PM (3) Epsom: 6:20 AM - 2:46 PM (4) Leatherhead: 5:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 21 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 21 bus arriving. Direction: Box Hill 21 bus Time Schedule 19 stops Box Hill Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:08 PM Leatherhead Railway Station (T) Station Approach, Leatherhead Tuesday 7:08 PM Leret Way, Leatherhead Wednesday 7:08 PM Leret Way, Leatherhead Thursday 7:08 PM The Crescent, Leatherhead Friday 7:08 PM Russell Court, Leatherhead Saturday Not Operational Highlands Road, Leatherhead Seeability, Leatherhead Lavender Close, Leatherhead 21 bus Info Clinton Road, Leatherhead Direction: Box Hill Stops: 19 Glenheadon Rise, Leatherhead Trip Duration: 27 min Line Summary: Leatherhead Railway Station (T), Tyrrells Wood, Leatherhead Leret Way, Leatherhead, The Crescent, Leatherhead, Highlands Road, Leatherhead, Seeability, Headley Court, Headley Leatherhead, Clinton Road, Leatherhead, Glenheadon Rise, Leatherhead, Tyrrells Wood, Hurst Lane, Headley Leatherhead, Headley Court, Headley, Hurst Lane, Headley, The Cock Inn, Headley, Broome Close, The Cock Inn, Headley Headley, Crossroads, Headley, Headley Common Road, Headley, Headley Common Road, Broome Close, Headley Pebblecombe, The Tree, Box Hill,
  • LCA 10.2 Ivinghoe Foothills Landscape Character Type

    LCA 10.2 Ivinghoe Foothills Landscape Character Type

    Aylesbury Vale District Council & Buckinghamshire County Council Aylesbury Vale Landscape Character Assessment LCA 10.2 Ivinghoe Foothills Landscape Character Type: LCT 10 Chalk Foothills B0404200/LAND/01 Aylesbury Vale District Council & Buckinghamshire County Council Aylesbury Vale Landscape Character Assessment LCA 10.2 Ivinghoe Foothills (LCT 10) Key Characteristics Location An extensive area of land which surrounds the Ivinghoe Beacon including the chalk pit at Pitstone Hill to the west and the Hemel Hempstead • Chalk foothills Gap to the east. The eastern and western boundaries are determined by the • Steep sided dry valleys County boundary with Hertfordshire. • Chalk outliers • Large open arable fields Landscape character The LCA comprises chalk foothills including dry • Network of local roads valleys and lower slopes below the chalk scarp. Also included is part of the • Scattering of small former chalk pits at Pitstone and at Ivinghoe Aston. The landscape is one of parcels of scrub gently rounded chalk hills with scrub woodland on steeper slopes, and woodland predominantly pastoral use elsewhere with some arable on flatter slopes to • Long distance views the east. At Dagnall the A4146 follows the gap cut into the Chilterns scarp. over the vale The LCA is generally sparsely settled other than at the Dagnall Gap. The area is crossed by the Ridgeway long distance footpath (to the west). The • Smaller parcels of steep sided valley at Coombe Hole has been eroded by spring. grazing land adjacent to settlements Geology The foothills are made up of three layers of chalk. The west Melbury marly chalk overlain by a narrow layer of Melbourn Rock which in turn is overlain by Middle Chalk.
  • Holiday Extra

    Holiday Extra

    From the M23 Junction 9 Brighton Crawley - 1 Follow the M23 overpass at Junction 9 and take the A23 Brighton A 3 Crawley 21 exit toward Airport 7 A2 - 2 Following signs to North Terminal go straight over M23 TO N Gatwick R LONGBRIDGELONGBRIDGE M25 JCt 7 E Gatwick the first roundabout ROUNDABOUTROUNDABOUT I G A E. Grinstead (A23) T D - 3 At the 2nd roundabout take the 4th exit signposted A E B R O R (M23) R S S A I G 3 A23 Crawley/Redhill D 5 2 H 9 CRO 3 T 2 Y O N M - 4 After joining the A23 Northbound, get into the right POVE Gatwick R 4 O hand lane A (A23) C D D H A R R L D - 5 At the roundabout take the 4th exit signposted A23 W O O AIRPORTAIRPORT WAYWAY ROUNDABOUTROUNDABOUT M23 Crawley/Brighton (you should now be travelling in the Junction 9a A 2 direction you have just come from) 3 1 NORTHNORTH 3 Crawley A I R - 6 Stay on the A23 southbound and go straight on at TERMINALTERMINAL P O R T W M23 D AY R the first roundabout Y E AIRPORTAIRPORT WAYWAY L 2 R ROUNDABOUTROUNDABOUT - 7 At the second roundabout take the 2nd exit for O M23 H EASTEAST Junction 9 Lowfield Heath/Charlwood RVP North Terminal Long Term NORTH - 8 After 200 yards take the 1st exit at the mini SSOUTHOUTH Air cargo Air Cargo Airport other areas TERMINALTERMINAL GATWICKGATWICK roundabout (Charlwood Road) 3 Redhill A23 North 2 AIPORTAIPORT - 9 Airparks is 1.5 miles ahead on the right hand side Terminal A LONDON GATWICK Crawley South From the M23 Junction 10 Airport RVP SOUTH D AIRPORT Other areas Redhill Terminal - 1 From the M23 overpass at Junction 10 take the exit proud to park your car General Aviation Terminal A Station A23 O R signposted Horsham (A2011) Airparks Gatwick N - 2 At the first roundabout take the 3rd exit signposted O Charlwood Road, Lowfield Heath T H A2011 Horsham (A23) Crawley, West Sussex, RH11 0QB Town Centre A23 3 G 3 I Horsham (A264) 2 - Next, you come to a roundabout with traffic lights.
  • Gossops Green Neighbourhood Centre Draft Conservation Area Appraisal (February 2021) DRAFT

    Gossops Green Neighbourhood Centre Draft Conservation Area Appraisal (February 2021) DRAFT

    Gossops Green Neighbourhood Centre Draft Conservation Area Appraisal (February 2021) DRAFT crawley.gov.uk Contents Part 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Part 2. General Character, Location and Uses ........................................................................................ 4 Part 3. Historic Interest ........................................................................................................................... 6 Part 4. Architectural Interest and Built Form .......................................................................................... 7 Part 5. Locally Important Buildings ....................................................................................................... 10 Part 6. Spatial Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 13 Part 7. Streets and Open Space, Parks and Gardens, and Trees........................................................... 13 Part 8. Setting and Views ...................................................................................................................... 17 Part 9. Character Areas and zones ........................................................................................................ 24 Part 10. Assessment of Condition ......................................................................................................... 26 Part 11. Identifying
  • Beyond the Compact City: a London Case Study – Spatial Impacts, Social Polarisation, Sustainable 1 Development and Social Justice

    Beyond the Compact City: a London Case Study – Spatial Impacts, Social Polarisation, Sustainable 1 Development and Social Justice

    University of Westminster Duncan Bowie January 2017 Reflections, Issue 19 BEYOND THE COMPACT CITY: A LONDON CASE STUDY – SPATIAL IMPACTS, SOCIAL POLARISATION, SUSTAINABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL JUSTICE Duncan Bowie Senior Lecturer, Department of Planning and Transport, University of Westminster [email protected] Abstract: Many urbanists argue that the compact city approach to development of megacities is preferable to urban growth based on spatial expansion at low densities, which is generally given the negative description of ‘urban sprawl’. The argument is often pursued on economic grounds, supported by theories of agglomeration economics, and on environmental grounds, based on assumptions as to efficient land use, countryside preservation and reductions in transport costs, congestion and emissions. Using London as a case study, this paper critiques the continuing focus on higher density and hyper-density residential development in the city, and argues that development options beyond its core should be given more consideration. It critiques the compact city assumptions incorporated in strategic planning in London from the first London Plan of 2004, and examines how the both the plan and its implementation have failed to deliver the housing needed by Londoners and has led to the displacement of lower income households and an increase in spatial social polarisation. It reviews the alternative development options and argues that the social implications of alternative forms of growth and the role of planning in delivering spatial social justice need to be given much fuller consideration, in both planning policy and the delivery of development, if growth is to be sustainable in social terms and further spatial polarisation is to be avoided.
  • Junior Mile Provisional Entries (Updated 21St March) Race Date – Monday 5Th April

    Junior Mile Provisional Entries (Updated 21St March) Race Date – Monday 5Th April

    Junior mile provisional entries (updated 21st March) Race date – Monday 5th April www.pb5k.co.uk Name Club Age Category Seed Time Nathan Rollins Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U15 04:45 Charlie Wright Lewes AC U15 04:58 Joshua Mingoia Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U15 05:00 Finley Jones Brighton Phoenix U17 05:03 Reus Brown Hastings AC U15 05:20 Grace Hughes Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U13 05:30 Elliott Marini Brighton & Hove AC U11 05:30 Lewis Wilby Brighton Phoenix U13 05:34 George Gilbert Brighton & Hove AC U11 05:37 Eva Barton West Suffolk AC U13 05:40 Summer Chapman Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U15 05:40 Katie Pye Aldershot Farnham & District U15 05:45 Theo Schofield Lewes AC U13 05:45 Raphael Kelly Brighton & Hove AC U13 05:46 Rowan Curtis Brighton & Hove AC U15 05:50 Oliver Holt Brighton & Hove AC U15 05:50 Sarim Toqeer Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U15 05:50 Ella Perry Bodyworks XTC Tri Store U15 05:51 Oscar Antoni Reynolds City Of Portsmouth AC U13 05:55 Jennifer Klein Crawley AC U13 06:00 Xanthe Cox Brighton & Hove AC U15 06:00 Esme Palmer-Malins Brighton Phoenix U15 06:00 Katherine Haslip Brighton Phoenix U11 06:00 Ava Chappell Ashford AC U11 06:00 Imogen Read Brighton Phoenix U15 06:00 Justin Klepacz City Of Portsmouth AC U11 06:00 Ana Passos Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U15 06:00 Stephanie Massie Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U13 06:00 George Bone Young Athletes Club U11 06:00 Aashni Manek Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U15 06:00 James Farley Windsor Slough Eton & Hounslow AC U13 06:00 Abigail
  • Manor Royal Economic Impact Study Final Report Manor Royal Business District January 2018

    Manor Royal Economic Impact Study Final Report Manor Royal Business District January 2018

    Manor Royal Economic Impact Study Final Report Manor Royal Business District January 2018 © 2018 Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd, trading as Lichfields. All Rights Reserved. Registered in England, no. 2778116. 14 Regent’s Wharf, All Saints Street, London N1 9RL Formatted for double sided printing. Plans based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A 15885/CGJ/JTi 14791320v3 Manor Royal Economic Impact Study : Final Report Executive Summary This report has been prepared by Lichfields on behalf of the Manor Royal BID Company Limited in partnership with Crawley Borough Council and West Sussex County Council. It presents the results of an Economic Impact Study (EIS) of the Manor Royal Business District in Crawley. The aim of the study is to build on existing evidence to understand the constraints and opportunities that face Manor Royal, consider the different mechanisms that are available to promote economic growth at Manor Royal, and provide recommendations and a way forward that will enable Manor Royal Business District to prosper. The EIS is intended to identify potential actions to allow the Manor Royal Business Improvement District (BID) and its key local authority partners to understand what the future direction of Manor Royal needs to be, practically how this might be delivered and the respective role of each organisation in conjunction with businesses and other stakeholders. The key findings of the study can be summarised as follows: Manor Royal’s Economic Footprint Manor Royal makes a significant contribution to the economy of Crawley and the Gatwick Diamond, employing significant concentrations of people, supporting supply chain jobs and contributing to the public purse.
  • Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London `Sink Estate'

    Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London `Sink Estate'

    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183–2803) 2020, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 20–33 DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i1.2395 Article Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’ Paul Watt Department of Geography, Birkbeck, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 4 August 2019 | Accepted: 9 December 2019 | Published: 27 February 2020 Abstract This article offers a critical assessment of Loic Wacquant’s influential advanced marginality framework with reference to research undertaken on a London public/social housing estate. Following Wacquant, it has become the orthodoxy that one of the major vectors of advanced marginality is territorial stigmatisation and that this particularly affects social housing es- tates, for example via mass media deployment of the ‘sink estate’ label in the UK. This article is based upon a multi-method case study of the Aylesbury estate in south London—an archetypal stigmatised ‘sink estate.’ The article brings together three aspects of residents’ experiences of the Aylesbury estate: territorial stigmatisation and dissolution of place, both of which Wacquant focuses on, and housing conditions which he neglects. The article acknowledges the deprivation and various social problems the Aylesbury residents have faced. It argues, however, that rather than internalising the extensive and intensive media-fuelled territorial stigmatisation of their ‘notorious’ estate, as Wacquant’s analysis implies, residents have largely disregarded, rejected, or actively resisted the notion that they are living in an ‘estate from hell,’ while their sense of place belonging has not dissolved. By contrast, poor housing—in the form of heating breakdowns, leaks, infes- tation, inadequate repairs and maintenance—caused major distress and frustration and was a more important facet of their everyday lives than territorial stigmatisation.
  • The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond

    The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond

    The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond Hugo Bessis and Adeline Bailly October, 2017 1 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 About Centre for Cities Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the economic success of UK cities. We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this through impartial research and knowledge exchange. For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about About the authors Hugo Bessis is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4323 Adeline Bailly is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4317 Picture credit “Astral Towers” by Andy Skudder (http://bit.ly/2krxCKQ), licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0) Supported by 2 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 Executive Summary The Gatwick Diamond is not only one of the South East’s strongest economies, but also one of the UK’s best performing areas. But growth brings with it a number of pressures too, which need to be managed to maintain the success of the area. This report measures the performance of the Gatwick Diamond relative to four comparator areas in the South East, benchmarking its success and setting out some of the policy challenges for the future. The Gatwick Diamond makes a strong contribution to the UK economy. It performs well above the national average on a range of different economic indicators, such as its levels of productivity, its share of high-skilled jobs, and its track record of attracting foreign investment.