Death Row U.S.A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Death Row U.S.A DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2018 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2018 (As of January 1, 2018) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,768 Race of Defendant: White 1,170 (42.27%) Black 1,152 (41.62%) Latino/Latina 365 (13.19%) Native American 27 (0.98%) Asian 53 (1.91%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,713 (98.01%) Female 55 (1.99%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Fall 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Byrd v. United States, No. 16-1371 (Driver’s expectation of privacy when not on rental lease of car) (decision below 679 Fed.Appx. 146 (3rd Cir. 2017)) Question Presented: Does a driver have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he has the renter's permission to drive the car but is not listed as an authorized driver on the rental agreement? Carpenter v. United States, No. 16-402 (Warrantless cell phone tracking) (decision below 819 F.3d 880 (6th Cir. 2016)) Question Presented: Is the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days permitted by the 4th Amendment? Collins v. Virginia, No. 16-1027 (Automobile search exception) (decision below 790 S.E.2d 611 (Va. 2016)) Question Presented: Does the 4th Amendment's automobile exception permit a police officer, uninvited and without a warrant, to enter private property, approach a home, and search a vehicle parked a few feet from the house? Fifth Amendment Hays, Kansas v. Vogt, No. 16-1495 (Use of incriminating statements at probable cause hearing) (decision below 844 F.3d 1235 (10th Cir. 2017)) Question Presented: Is the 5th Amendment violated when incriminating statements are used at a probable cause hearing but not at a criminal trial? Sixth Amendment MCoy v. Louisiana, No.16-8255 (Right to a defense in a capital trial) (decision below 218 So. 3d 535 (La. 2016)) Question Presented: Is it unconstitutional for defense counsel to concede an accused's guilt over the accused's express objection? Fourteenth Amendment Class v. United States, No. 16-424 (Appellate claims that survive a guilty plea) (decision below No. 15-3015 (DC Cir. 2016)) Question Presented: Does a guilty plea inherently waive a defendant's right to challenge the constitutionality of his statute of conviction? Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 2. CASES RAISING HABEAS CORPUS QUESTIONS Ayestas v. Davis, No. 16-6795 (Resources to investigate and develop a claim) (decision below 817 F.3d 888 (5th Cir. 2016)) Question Presented: Did the 5th Circuit err in holding that 18 U.S.C. § 3599(f) withholds "reasonably necessary" resources to investigate and develop an IAC claim that state habeas counsel forfeited, where the claimant's existing evidence does not meet the ultimate burden of proof at the time the § 3599(f) motion is made? Dunn v. Madison, No. 17-193 (“Unreasonable application” of federal law) (decision below 851 F. 3d 1173 (11th Cir. 2017)) Questions Presented: 1) Do the Court’s precedents clearly establish that a prisoner is incompetent to be executed for a murder because he does not remember or acknowledge committing it? (2) Was the state court objectively unreasonable in concluding that Madison was competent to be executed? Decision: In a per curiam decision, the Court held that the state court’s determination that Madison was competent to be executed because he understood he was to be executed for a murder he was found to have committed was not an unreasonable application of federal law and was supported by the evidence, despite Madison’s memory loss as to the specific facts of the murder or prior procedures. Kernan v. Cuero, No. 16–1468 (“Clearly established” federal law) (decision below Cuero v. Cate, 827 F.3d 879 (9th Cir. 2016)) Question Presented: Did the court of appeals exceed the proper scope of federal habeas review by setting aside a state criminal sentence based on a putative federal due process right to specific performance of a plea agreement that was superseded and withdrawn, in accordance with state law, before the entry of judgment? Decision: Yes. In a per curiam opinion, the Court decided that none of its decisions clearly established that a state must honor an original plea agreement rather than allow the defendant to withdraw his plea after amendment of the criminal complaint in a way that permitted a higher sentence to be imposed. Wilson v. Sellers, No. 16-6855 (Habeas review of summary state court ruling) (decision below 834 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2016)) Question Presented: Did this Court's decision in Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011), silently abrogate the presumption set forth in Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797 (1991) - that a federal court sitting in habeas should "look through" a summary state court ruling to review the last reasoned decision - as a slim majority of the en banc 11th Circuit held in this case, despite the agreement of both parties that the Ylst presumption should continue to apply? 3. CASES RAISING OTHER IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTIONS Hughes v. United States, No. 17-155 (Precedent of a 4-1-4 decision) (decision below 849 F.3d 1008 (11th Cir. 2017)) Question Presented: 1) Does the USSC's decision in Marks v. U. S., 430 U.S. 188 (1977), mean that the concurring opinion in a 4-1-4 decision represents the holding of the Court where neither the plurality's reasoning nor the concurrence's reasoning is a logical subset of the other? 2) Under Marks, are the lower courts bound by the 4-Justice plurality opinion in Freeman v. U.S., 564 U.S. 522 (2011), or, instead, by Justice Sotomayor's separate concurring opinion with which all 8 other Justices disagreed? 3) As the 4-Justice plurality in Freeman concluded, is a Death Row U.S.A. Page 3 defendant who enters into a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement generally eligible for a sentence reduction if there is a later, retroactive amendment to the relevant Guidelines range? Murphy v. Smith, No. 16-1067 (Defendants’ attorney fees in § 1983 suit) (decision below 844 F.3d 653 (7th Cir. 2017)) Question Presented: Does the parenthetical phrase "not to exceed 25 percent" in 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2) (providing for fees for the losing defendant’s lawyers from the successful plaintiff’s monetary award) mean any amount up to 25 percent (as four circuits hold), or does it mean exactly 25 percent (as the Seventh Circuit holds)? Rosales-Mireles v. United States, No. 16-9493 (Plain error review in federal cases) (decision below 850 F.3d 246 (5th Cir. 2017)) Question Presented: To meet the standard of the 4th prong of United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993), concerning correction of a plain error, is it necessary, as the 5th Circuit required, that the error be one that "would shock the conscience of the common man, serve as a powerful indictment against our system of Justice, or seriously call into question the competence or integrity of the district judge?" United States v. Sanchez-Gomez, No. 17-312 (Interlocutory appeal of use of pretrial physical restraints) (decision below 859 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 2017)) Question Presented: Did the court of appeals err in asserting authority to review respondents' interlocutory challenge to pretrial physical restraints and in ruling on that challenge notwithstanding its recognition that respondents' individual claims were moot? Death Row U.S.A. Page 4 As of January 1, 2018 Total number of executions since the 1976 reinstatement of capital punishment: 1465 Race of defendants executed Race of victims total number 1465 total number 2148 White 817 (55.77%) White 1626 (75.70%) Black 504 (34.40%) Black 329 (15.32%) Latino/a 121 (8.26%) Latin 148 (6.89%) Native American 16 (1.09%) Native American 5 (0.23%) Asian 7 (0.48%) Asian 40 (1.86%) Gender of defendants executed Gender of victims Female 16 (1.09%) Female 1047 (48.74%) Male 1449 (98.91%) Male 1101 (51.26%) Defendant-victim racial combinations White Victim Black Victim Latino/a Victim Asian Victim Native American Victim White Defendant 755 51.54% 20 1.37% 17 1.16% 6 0.41% 0 0% Black Defendant 288 19.66% 168 11.47% 20 1.37% 15 1.02% 0 0% Latino/a Defendant 51 3.48% 3 0.20% 59 4.03% 2 0.14% 0 0% Asian Defendant 2 0.14% 0 0% 0 0% 5 0.34% 0 0% Native Amer.
Recommended publications
  • Lethal Injection, Or Choice of Gas Chamber for Those Sentenced Before November 1992) Total = 121 B = 13 W = 85 L = 18 N = 5 A= 0 U = 0
    NotiottolCJJJb Suite 1600 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE 99 Hudson Street AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. New York, N.Y. 10013-2897 (212) 219-1900 Fax: (212) 226-759 Fall 1998 ) DEATH R0\1/, V.SA TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWNTO LOP: 3,517 (As of October 1, 1998) · Race of Defendant: White 1,649 (46.89%) Black 1,495 (42.51%) Latino/Latina 282 ( 8.02%) Native American 50 ( 1.42%) Asian 27 ( .77%) Unknown at this issue 14 ( • 4 0%) Gender: Male 3,469 (98.64 %) Female 48 ( 1. 36 %) Juveniles: Male 73 ( 2.08%) DISPOSITIONS SINCE JANUARY 1, 1973: Executions: 481 Suicides: 51 Commutations: 76 (including those by the Governor of Texas resulting from favorable court decisions) Died of natural causes or killed while under death sentence: 112 Convictions/Sentences reversed: 1642 JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 40 (Underlined jurisdictions have statutes but no sentences imposed) Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 1 3 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wiscons i n. Relf"""'/Off"" COfttri6..uo,u M t The NAACP Leg. I Oeferuc at Educau onal Fund. Inc. (LOF) 11 not pan Suite JOI Jtd.., 1,hl,for U.S. Swue21ll of the National Assoc1at1on for the Advancement of Colored People 127SK Street, NW 31SWm Ninth Strcct t4X pvrposes (NAACP) ah.hough LOF wu founded by the NAACP and 1u '"'°"" wm Wu hington.
    [Show full text]
  • The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation National Honor Guard
    CPO FAMILY Autumn 2017 A Publication of The CPO Foundation Vol. 27, No. 2 The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation National Honor Guard To see the CPOF National Honor Guard members “up close and personal,” go to pages 24-25. Bravery Above and Beyond the Call of Duty See page 20 for the inspiring stories of these three life-saving Corrections Professionals whose selfless acts of Sgt. Mark Barra bravery “off the job” Calipatria State Prison, CA earned them much- Lt. John Mendiboure Lt. Christopher Gainey deserved recognition at Avenal SP, CA Pender Correctional Project 2000 XXVIII. Institution, NC Inside, starting on page 4: PROJECT 2000 XXVIII ~ June 15-18, 2017, San Francisco, CA 1 Field Representatives CPO FAMILY Jennifer Donaldson Davis Alabama Carolyn Kelley Alabama The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation Ned Entwisle Alaska 1346 N. Market Blvd. • Sacramento, CA 95834 Liz Shaffer-Smith Arizona P. O. Box 348390 • Sacramento, CA 95834-8390 Annie Norman Arkansas 916.928.0061 • 800.800.CPOF Connie Summers California cpof.org Charlie Bennett California Guy Edmonds Colorado Directors of The CPO Foundation Kim Blakley Federal Glenn Mueller Chairman/National Director George Meshko Federal Edgar W. Barcliff, Jr. Vice Chairman/National Director Laura Phillips Federal Don Dease Secretary/National Director John Williams Florida Richard Waldo Treasurer/National Director Donald Almeter Florida Salvador Osuna National Director Jim Freeman Florida Jim Brown National Director Vanessa O’Donnell Georgia Kim Potter-Blair National Director Rose Williams
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF STANLY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 95 CRS 567 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) v. ) ) GUY TOBIAS LEGRANDE, Defendant. ) ........................................................... MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF PURSUANT TO THE RACIAL JUSTICE ACT ............................................................ Defendant, Guy Tobias LeGrande, through counsel, files this Motion for Appropriate Relief pursuant to the Racial Justice Act (HA), N.C. Gen. Stat. $$ 15A-2010 to 15A-2012, the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Art. I, $9 1, 19, 24, 26, and 27 of the North Carolina Constitution. Under the RJA and constitutional law, Defendant, who is currently under a sentence of death, is entitled to a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. INTRODUCTION 1. The evidence set out in this Motion establishes that race is a significant factor in North Carolina's system of capital punishment. The comprehensive, scientific study presented here demonstrates that race is a significant factor in capital proceedings. Prosecutors across the state strike eligible black and other racial minority venire members at double the rate they strike eligible white venire members and individuals who kill whites have significantly increased odds of receiving a death sentence than those who kill blacks or other racial minorities. 2. The evidence set out in this Motion also establishes that race is an extraordinarily significant factor in capital proceedings in the 20Ih ~rosecutorialDistrict. The disparity seen between the prosecutors' strikes of eligible black and other racial minority venire members compared to eligible white venire members is the highest of any district in North Carolina that has more than one person currently on death row.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aroostook Times, November 29, 1911
    Vol 61. Houlton, Maine, Wednesday, November 29, 1911. No. 48 navy: I). W. Taylor, L. S. Adam- lO l T. G. Rupert.- and William McKnio and Kriginecring (’hid ('. I . Me Allistor. The Merrill Trust Company Lewis Nixon spoke on 11: e . * IT* et - the Panama canai would have on A Safe .Way Keep?* constantly on hand for its customers American commerce and said that anything in a treaty concerning t to bond investments in $100, $500 and $1,000 canal t hat conflicted wit h t lie ri j t To In v e st denominations paying from 4 to 5 1-4 per cent. of American vessels to pass through 8 the canal free should he a broga-t ed. o a l 8 If you can be satisfied that your principal will be safe “ My earnest conviction." said Mr. R V would you not like to increase your income by investing Nixon, "is that we must return in Idle Money in this class of securities ? Only the SA FE ST and MOST our carlv policy of discriminat inn securities are ever recommended by this Company. duties and tom ace taxes if we are to revive our merchant marine m Baking Powder the foreign trade, and I am sorr\ that I cannot see the advantages a.- Absolutely Pure D rop us a lincST ife?!* all you about bond investments conditions now (exist of the Panama canal other t ban as a war measure and as an altruistic enterprise in Makes Home Baking Easy Our Aroostook Representative, Mr. L. McGown, will be at the Snell House, which charity begins abroad." President Taylor asserted in his be pleased to Houlton, Maine, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • D£A 11I ROW, V.S.A
    N«ionolOjJb Suite HiOO NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE 99 Hudson Street AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC . New York, N.Y. 10013-2897 (212) 219-1900 Fax : (212) 22~7592 Summer 1995 D£A 11i ROW, V.S.A. TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWNTO LDF: 3,028 (As of August 31, 1995) Race of Defendant: White 1,467 (48 .42%) Black 1,224 (40 . 42%) Latino / Latina 234 ( 7 . 73%) Native American 51 ( 1.68%) Asian 23 ( .76%) Unkn own at this issue 29 ( .96%) Gender: Male 2,978 (98.35%) Female 50 ( 1. 65%) DISPOSITIONS SINCE JANUARY 1, 1973: Executions: 295 Suicides: 41 Commutations: 72 (including those by the Governor of Texas resulting from favo rab le court deci si ons ) Died of natural c auses, or killed while under death sentence: 92 Convictions / Sentences reversed: 1469 JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 40 (Underlined jurisdictions have statutes but no sentences imposed) Alabama, Arizona , Arkansas, California, Colorado, Conne cticut, Delaware , Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hamps hire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New Yor k, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah , Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S~ .Military_ JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 13 Alaska, Distri c t of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Is l and , Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. C... odlllNHUfft The NAACP L<gal Drfcnsc & F.iucat ioiul Fund, lac. (LDF) is not part ....,,..i,for U .S Suite 301 SuitrD of tbe Natioiu l Association for die Advancement of Colo red People 127SK Street, NW 315 West Nind, Sattt illlOfflt ta' rrpous (NAACP ) although LDF was fowided by tbe NAACP and diam iu Wuluogton , DC 20005 Los ~le, .
    [Show full text]
  • EVERLYPEDIA (Formerly the Everly Brothers Index – TEBI) Coordinated by Robin Dunn & Chrissie Van Varik
    EVERLYPEDIA (formerly The Everly Brothers Index – TEBI) Coordinated by Robin Dunn & Chrissie van Varik EVERLYPEDIA PART 2 E to J Contact us re any omissions, corrections, amendments and/or additional information at: [email protected] E______________________________________________ EARL MAY SEED COMPANY - see: MAY SEED COMPANY, EARL and also KMA EASTWOOD, CLINT – Born 31st May 1930. There is a huge quantity of information about Clint Eastwood his life and career on numerous websites, books etc. We focus mainly on his connection to The Everly Brothers and in particular to Phil Everly plus brief overview of his career. American film actor, director, producer, composer and politician. Eastwood first came to prominence as a supporting cast member in the TV series Rawhide (1959–1965). He rose to fame for playing the Man with No Name in Sergio Leone’s Dollars trilogy of spaghetti westerns (A Fistful of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More, and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly) during the 1960s, and as San Francisco Police Department Inspector Harry Callahan in the Dirty Harry films (Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, The Enforcer, Sudden Impact and The Dead Pool) during the 1970s and 1980s. These roles, along with several others in which he plays tough-talking no-nonsense police officers, have made him an enduring cultural icon of masculinity. Eastwood won Academy Awards for Best Director and Producer of the Best Picture, as well as receiving nominations for Best Actor, for his work in the films Unforgiven (1992) and Million Dollar Baby (2004). These films in particular, as well as others including Play Misty for Me (1971), The Outlaw Josey Wales (1976), Pale Rider (1985), In the Line of Fire (1993), The Bridges of Madison County (1995) and Gran Torino (2008), have all received commercial success and critical acclaim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of Post-Furman Executions in North Carolina: a History of One Southern State's Evolving Standards
    \\server05\productn\E\ELO\1-1\ELO104.txt unknown Seq: 1 25-NOV-09 10:48 THE TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF POST-FURMAN EXECUTIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA: A HISTORY OF ONE SOUTHERN STATE’S EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY ©CYNTHIA F. ADCOCK INTRODUCTION ................................................ 113 R I. PRE-FURMAN ROLE OF CLEMENCY IN AN OVER-INCLUSIVE DEATH PENALTY SYSTEM ................................. 116 R II. THE STRUGGLE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL DEATH PENALTY: 1972-1990 ............................................. 118 R A. The execution of James Hutchins ...................... 120 R B. The execution of Velma Barfield ....................... 124 R C. The execution of John Rook ........................... 128 R D. After three executions, the death penalty machinery ground to a halt — again ................................... 129 R III. THE PUSH FOR MORE EXECUTIONS AND LESS DEFENSE LAWYERING: 1990-1996 .................................. 129 R IV. THE DECLINE OF SUPPORT FOR THE DEATH PENALTY IN NORTH CAROLINA: 1997 – 2008 ........................ 137 R V. THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNOR IN A NEW CAPITAL PUNISHMENT LANDSCAPE ................................ 146 R CONCLUSION .................................................. 155 R INTRODUCTION Dear Governor, I know you have a lot on your plate as a new Governor in a State in economic crisis. Unfortunately, there is another crisis coming your way, one brewing in the criminal justice system. You will likely soon face an unprecedented situation requiring you to decide whether to grant clemency to dozens of death row inmates with pending execution dates. The good news is that our State has struggled with the current death penalty system for over 25 years, and its citizens are more informed about issues of justice and fairness than most in the Southern Death Belt. North Carolinians know how broken the (113) \\server05\productn\E\ELO\1-1\ELO104.txt unknown Seq: 2 25-NOV-09 10:48 114 Elon Law Review [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • [Pennsylvania County Histories]
    REFE1IENCE ff £ COLLEI MS i jT-/t 3tC/f V. ~?y < / e Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun74unse MARK TW^IISTS scftap moK. PA TENTS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. June 24TH, 1873. May i6th, 1877. May i8th, 1877. TRADE MARKS: UNITED STATES. ■ GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOTE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. INDEX. U V w • V t'wmm V. f , ‘ ■ ■ .. \ >: ' ■ . • . ‘ , ‘ . : . , . , / -*1 \ •: . « ; , > r w X YZ "owns a great portion of the"ground, most. • :> of it located on the Schuylkill river be¬ S From, . low Wharton street, which by the open¬ ing of streets, and the enterprise of the \y.C^yr.r. owner, is fast coming into demand for public uses. League Island is separated from Green¬ Date, ...iJ,.‘..‘.(?..i. ../4/vrfy. wich Island by the Back channel, which s forms a commodious and fresh-water an- ’’i chorage for the iron-clads of our navy. DOal^-TOWfl Extensive improvements are proposed to be carried out on the island. A perma¬ nent plant will be established for the Something of Its History and Biographical building and repairing of ships for the Sketches of Some of its Former navy. This island was granted in 1699 Leading Citizens to the London Company, which ten years afterwards conveyed it to Thomas Fair- man.
    [Show full text]
  • BUT WILL IT PLAY in GRAND RAPIDS? the ROLE of GATEKEEPERS in MUSIC SELECTION in 1960S TOP 40 RADIO
    BUT WILL IT PLAY IN GRAND RAPIDS? THE ROLE OF GATEKEEPERS IN MUSIC SELECTION IN 1960s TOP 40 RADIO By Leonard A. O’Kelly A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Media and Information Studies - Doctor of Philosophy 2016 ABSTRACT BUT WILL IT PLAY IN GRAND RAPIDS? THE ROLE OF GATEKEEPERS IN MUSIC SELECTION IN 1960s TOP 40 RADIO By Leonard A. O’Kelly The decision to play (or not to play) certain songs on the radio can have financial ramifications for performers and for radio stations alike in the form of ratings and revenue. This study considers the theory of gatekeeping at the individual level, paired with industry factors such as advertising, music industry promotion, and payola to explain how radio stations determined which songs to play. An analysis of playlists from large-market Top 40 radio stations and small-market stations within the larger stations’ coverage areas from the 1960s will determine the direction of spread of song titles and the time frame for the spread of music, shedding light on how radio program directors (gatekeepers) may have been influenced in their decisions. By comparing this data with national charts, it may also be possible to determine whether or not local stations had any influence over the national trend. The role of industry trade publications such as Billboard and The Gavin Report are considered, and the rise of the broadcast consultant as a gatekeeper is explored. This study will also analyze the discrepancy in song selection with respect to race and gender as compared to national measures of popularity.
    [Show full text]
  • "You Really Got Me": a Complete Charting Odyssey- How the Kinks Blew the Doors Off the British Invasion Against Fierce Competition and Scored Their First U.S
    "You Really Got Me": A Complete Charting Odyssey- How The Kinks Blew The Doors Off the British Invasion Against Fierce Competition And Scored Their First U.S. Hit Mark Teehan May 2016 Introduction As a powerful, iconic record, "You Really Got Me" both saved and launched the Kinks' illustrious career. As a musical statement, it was the embodiment of so many forces and emotions: rage, defiance, rebellion, perseverance, and survival. Most of all, it marked the culmination of a monumental struggle by the band to have the song recorded in a manner so that it sounded as they envisioned- original and reflective of their working-class roots, the way it did in their live concerts. Musically, "You Really Got Me" represented a dichotomy of sorts: its controlled, monolithic bass-heavy, strong percussive sound was built around a monster riff that stood in sharp contrast to the wild abandon and distorted, gritty tone of Dave Davies' unique, memorable guitar solo. This essay will initially set the stage by summarizing the creation of "You Really Got Me," its recording, its sonic characteristics, and progress on the UK charts. Afterwards, we will shift to the article's primary focus of analyzing the complex charting of the Kinks' landmark record in the U.S. Using the extensive array of surviving local radio station music surveys from pivotal markets across America, this writer will analyze the intricate connection between those local surveys and the national charts as they affected "You Really Got Me". Furthermore, in order to provide valuable insight into the American pop music industry of the mid-60's and a broader perspective into the commercial progress of the Kinks' record in the U.S., this writer will cover on a secondary basis the charting of another single from a rival British group.
    [Show full text]
  • Available Now! BROADCAST FOUNDATION
    March 9, 2001 R&R 47 l,N!fiT/H SOS .S/HA/N/Nt0/N LARRYLWACK: THERESTOF THE STORY One hundred cigarettes, a gallon of coffee and 12 -hour days In the last installment of our "Larry's doing it the way I'd like the radio morning to prep. He'd smoke a hundred cigarettes, adventure with Larry Lujack (2/2), station to sound, and I'd like the rest of down a gallon of coffee, do his four hours, take a walk our hem had just arrived in Chicago. you to listen and get closer to that sound." and then come back and listen to an aircheck of the It was 1967, and WCFL PD Ken It was at WLS that Lujack started "The show. "This is a guy who worked very hard at what Draper had just hired him away from Crank Letter of the Day," which eventually he did," says Greenberg. WMEX /Boston to do overnights. evolved into "The Clunk Letter of the Day." "He came in early because he was cheap and Lujack's feelings about Boston aren't "I changed the name because a lot of the wanted to park on Lower Wacker," jokes John Gehron. generous. "I hated Boston," he says, letters were really stupid," Lujack says. Still, Gehron, an Infinity VP based in Chicago, was PD of "so I was only there for four months some of his other listeners weren't: David WLS when Lujack returned, and he remembers it well. and then went to 'CFL." Letterman at Ball University and one Jeff "WLS was a very unique radio station, and I always Christy (a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • K-EARTH 101 Radio Personality “Shotgun Tom”
    WHO’S WHAT / WHAT’S WHERE May 2015 A Non-Profit Fraternal Organization of Radio and Television Broadcast Professionals K-EARTH 101 Radio Personality “Shotgun Tom” Kelly is Honored Luncheon re-cap written by Don Barrett, Publisher of LAradio.com (edited for space) Photo Captions: Gerry Fry First it was a Star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame for K-EARTH afternooner, “SHOTGUN TOM” KELLY. On March 27th, Shotgun was presented with the ART GILMORE Career Achievement Award at the Pacific Pioneer Broadcasters lun- cheon at Sportsmen’s Lodge in Studio City. Hundreds of Shotgun’s colleagues reminisced with him as a star-studded dais told stories. JHANI KAYE, Tom’s former boss at K-EARTH, put together an incredibly fascinating 13-minute video that traced his life from gawking youngster watching a San Diego DJ in a glass radio booth to his recent successes. The video can be viewed on youtube.com by searching for “shotgun tom kelly pacific pioneer broadcasters.” Everyone on the dais donned Smokey Bear ranger’s hats to honor Tom. Seated PPB President CHUCK STREET outlined Tom’s career from San L-R: ROBERT DAVID HALL, KERRI KASEM, honoree “SHOTGUN TOM” Diego to his time at KAFY in Bakersfield. It was DJ CHARLIE KELLY, PPB Chairman of the Board JEANNE DEVIVIER BROWN. Standing VAN DYKE who discovered Tom in Bakersfield and brought L-R: LOU WATERS, GARY BRYAN, PPB President CHUCK STREET, NEIL ROSS, JHANI KAYE. Not picutred HAROLD GREENE, TIM CONWAY, JR. him “home” to begin his San Diego career, which included (Ken Karagozian Photo) big Top 40 stations like KGB and KCBQ, but also winning two Emmys for hosting a children’s program, Words-A-Poppin’.
    [Show full text]