A New Soldier-Producing Aphid Species, Pseudoregma Baenzigeri, Sp
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities. -
Entomology Research Recommendations
ENTOMOLOGY RESEARCH FINDINGS/ RECOMMENDATIONS Division of Crop Protection 01. Research Findings of Research based on Sugarcane Woolly Aphid (SWA); Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera: Aphididae) i. Natural enemy spectrum of SWA includes only arthropod predators and six species have been identified (Wanasinghe et al; 2012). - Dipha aphidivora (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) - Micromus sp. (Neuroptera: Hemorabiidae) - Eupeodes sp. (Diptera: Syrphidae) - Micraspis discolor (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) - Synonycha sp. (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) - Micraspis allardi (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) Reference: - VKASM Wanasinghe, NC Kumarasinghe and KMG Chanchala (2012). Natural Enemies of Sugarcane Woolly Aphid (Ceratovacuna lanigera): A survey in Passara, Sri Lanka. Proceeding of the forth symposium on plantation crop research, pp 163-170 (Annex 01). ii. Variations of population density of the three natural predators of SWA According to the data collected to find out the variations of population density of the three natural predators of SWA (Dipha aphidivora, Micromus sp. and unidentified Syrphid fly larva) from January 2012 to December 2014 indicated that, Dipha aphidivora and Micromus sp. were recorded throughout the sampling period. Peak populations of Dipha aphidivora were recorded in months of December and January in each year. Peak populations of Micromus sp. were recorded during the time periods with low number of Dipha aphidivora and the correlation coefficient value between the population levels of Dipha aphidivora and Micromus sp. is 0.0047. Unidentified Syrphid fly larva was recorded an uneven distribution during the study period (Annual Research Progress, 2014) iii. Relationship of the three natural predators of SWA with some weather parameters The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient values of each three predator with rainfall, temperature and relative humidity (Table 1) have indicated that, there were no significant correlations of each predator with the weather parameters (Annual Research Progress, 2014) (Annex 02). -
White Plant Shoots, Wax-Producing Insects and Other White Structures Made by Arthropods: a Mimicry Complex?
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 343–349, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.043 POINT OF VIEW White plant shoots, wax-producing insects and other white structures made by arthropods: A mimicry complex? KAZUO YAMAZAKI Osaka Institute of Public Health, 8-34 Tojo-cho, Tennoji, Osaka 543-0026, Japan; e-mail: [email protected]. jp Key words. Plant mimicry, anti-herbivore defence, cocoon, entomopathogenic fungus, spider egg sac, spittlebug froth, trichome, wax Abstract. Many insects masquerade as parts of plants, such as bark or leaves, or mimic poisonous organisms in order to defend themselves against predators. However, recent studies indicate that plants may mimic insects and other arthropods to deter herbi- vores. Here, I report visually similar white structures of plants and arthropods in Japan and suggest they are part of a mimicry com- plex. Young shoots covered with white trichomes or waxy substances may mimic wax-producing insects, such as woolly aphids, coccids and caterpillars, potentially resulting in reduced herbivory. Since wax-producing insects would reduce plant quality and quantity, be distasteful and attract natural enemies, herbivorous insects and mammals may avoid such white shoots. Furthermore, fungus-infected insects, gregarious braconid cocoons, spider egg sacs and froth made by froghopper nymphs or blasticotomid sawfl y larvae are also conspicuously white and impose risks for herbivorous insects. Thus, these white structures may be mimicry models for white shoots and are likely to be part of a defensive mimicry complex. Although this study focuses on defence against herbivores, there are simultaneous physiological roles for white colouration that will not be discussed in depth here. -
Predatory and Parasitic Lepidoptera: Carnivores Living on Plants
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 49(4), 1995, 412-453 PREDATORY AND PARASITIC LEPIDOPTERA: CARNIVORES LIVING ON PLANTS NAOMI E. PIERCE Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA ABSTRACT. Moths and butterflies whose larvae do not feed on plants represent a decided minority slice of lepidopteran diversity, yet offer insights into the ecology and evolution of feeding habits. This paper summarizes the life histories of the known pred atory and parasitic lepidopteran taxa, focusing in detail on current research in the butterfly family Lycaenidae, a group disproportionately rich in aphytophagous feeders and myr mecophilous habits. More than 99 percent of the 160,000 species of Lepidoptera eat plants (Strong et al. 1984, Common 1990). Plant feeding is generally associated with high rates of evolutionary diversification-while only 9 of the 30 extant orders of insects (Kristensen 1991) feed on plants, these orders contain more than half of the total number of insect species (Ehrlich & Raven 1964, Southwood 1973, Mitter et al. 1988, cf. Labandiera & Sepkoski 1993). Phytophagous species are characterized by specialized diets, with fewer than 10 percent having host ranges of more than three plant families (Bernays 1988, 1989), and butterflies being particularly host plant-specific (e.g., Remington & Pease 1955, Remington 1963, Ehrlich & Raven 1964). This kind of life history specialization and its effects on population structure may have contributed to the diversification of phytophages by promoting population subdivision and isolation (Futuyma & Moreno 1988, Thompson 1994). Many studies have identified selective forces giving rise to differences in niche breadth (Berenbaum 1981, Scriber 1983, Rausher 1983, Denno & McClure 1983, Strong et al. -
Biology of Sugarcane Woolly Aphid Predator, Dipha Aphidivora Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
CJ. Bioi. Control. 20( I): 81-84. 2006 ) Biology of sugarcane woolly aphid predator, Dipha aphidivora Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) M. S. PUTTANNAVAR, R. K. PATIL*, M. VIDYA, G. K. RAMEGOWDA, S. LINGAPPA, SHEKARAPPA and K.A. KULKARNI Department ofAgricultural Entomology, College ofAgriculture University ofAgricultural Sciences Dhm'wad 580 005, Kamataka, India E-mail:[email protected] ABSTRACT: A laboratory study was carried out on biology of sugarcane woolly aphid (SWA) predator, Diplla apllidivora Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). DilJ110 al'flitiivora occupied 5.6 ± 0.81, 24.61 ± 3.41, 7.80 ± 0.51, 1.65 ± 0.54 and 3.89 ± 0.74 days for incubation. total larval period, pupation, longevity ot· adult male and female, respectively. The total lire cycle .'a.sted for 43.27 ± 5.84 days. During its total larval period of 24.61 ± 3.41 days, a single 1). alJllltilVora consumed on an average 6,074.84 ± 87.6 sugarcane woolly aphids. KEY WORDS: Biology, DipJw aphidivo/"{/, sugarcane woolly aphid All around the world 47 natural enemies have the biological control agent in the management of been recorded on sugarcane woolly aphid (SWA). SWA. A laboratory investigation was carried out at Among these natural enemies, predators (37) are Department ofAgricultural Entomology, Col.lege of predominant, followed by parasitoids (7) and Agriculture, University of Agricultural SCiences, entomopathogens (3) (Joshi and Viraktamath, 2004). Dharwad during 2003-04. Out of these 37 predators, belonging to six orders The pupae of D. aphidivora were collected (Coleoptera, Neuroptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, from the SWA infested fie1d and allowed to adult Hemiptera and Araneae), only three predators viz., emerge in the cages with glass front cages (35 x 24 Dipha aphidivora Meyrick. -
Defensive Nymphs of the Woolly Aphid Thoracaphis Kashifolia (Hemiptera) on the Oak Quercus Glauca
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2016, Article ID 4036571, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4036571 Research Article Defensive Nymphs of the Woolly Aphid Thoracaphis kashifolia (Hemiptera) on the Oak Quercus glauca Utako Kurosu,1 Shigeyuki Aoki,2 Keigo Uematsu,3 Mayako Kutsukake,3 and Takema Fukatsu3 1 Faculty of Economics, Chuo University, 742-1 Higashinakano, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0393, Japan 2Faculty of Economics, Rissho University, Osaki 4-2-16, Tokyo 141-8602, Japan 3Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8566, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Shigeyuki Aoki; [email protected] Received 12 March 2016; Revised 2 August 2016; Accepted 16 August 2016 Academic Editor: G. Wilson Fernandes Copyright © 2016 Utako Kurosu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Aphid nymphs with enlarged fore- and mid-legs were found from woolly colonies of Thoracaphis kashifolia (Hormaphidinae, Nipponaphidini) on leaves of the evergreen Quercus glauca in Japan. It was shown that they grasped an introduced moth larva with their legs and some inserted their stylets deep into the body. These defenders were first-instar nymphs of the alate generation and were produced by aleyrodiform apterae from early September onward. There was a large variation in the size of their forelegs. First-instar nymphs (to be alates) produced early in the season had fore-femorotrochanters shorter than those produced later. The molting rate (the percentage of pharate individuals) of the latter was very low (less than 5% to zero), suggesting their semisterility. -
Production of Alarm Pheromone in Aphids and Perception by Ants and Natural Enemies
COMMUNAUTE FRANCAISE DE BELGIQUE ACADEMIE UNIVERSITAIRE WALLONIE-EUROPE FACULTE UNIVERSITAIRE DES SCIENCES AGRONOMIQUES DE GEMBLOUX Production of alarm pheromone in aphids and perception by ants and natural enemies François VERHEGGEN Essai présenté en vue de l’obtention du grade de docteur en sciences agronomiques et ingénierie biologique Promoteur: Prof. Eric Haubruge 2008 1 2 3 Copyright. Aux termes de la loi belge du 30 juin 1994, sur le droit d’auteur et les droits voisins, seul l’auteur a le droit de reproduire partiellement ou complètement cet ouvrage de quelque façon et forme que ce soit ou d’en autoriser la reproduction partielle ou complète de quelque manière et sous quelque forme que ce soit. Toute photocopie ou reproduction sous autre forme est donc faite en violation de la dite loi et des modifications ultérieures. 4 Verheggen François. (2008). Production of alarm pheromone in aphids and perception by ants and natural enemies (Thèse de doctorat). Gembloux, Belgium, Gembloux Agricultural University, 197p., 9 tabl., 32 fig. Abstract: Most Aphidinae species produce and use ( E)-ß-farnesene (Eßf) as an alarm pheromone. This sesquiterpene is released by individuals under attack by a predator, and nearby aphids exhibit a variety of alarm behaviours. This PhD thesis aims to better understand how aphids manage their production and emission of alarm pheromone (Chapter IV). We also wanted, in a second step, to improve our knowledge on the roles that Eßf could play in the relationships that aphids have with their predators (Chapter V) and tending ants (Chapter VI), in order to better pinpoint the problem in this very tough context. -
11 Endocrine Control of Insect Polyphenism
11 Endocrine Control of Insect Polyphenism K. Hartfelder Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil D.J. Emlen University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All Rights Reserved Summary the insulin-signaling pathway is now also emerging as a Polyphenism in insects is associated with some of the major player. We present an overview of current knowl- most striking and successful life histories. Insect poly- edge regarding wing length dimorphism in crickets, phenisms center around four major themes: wing the gradual phase shift from the solitary to gregarious length variation (including winglessness), differences syndrome in migrating locusts, the complex switch- in fertility or reproductive strategies, body and/or wing ing between wingless/winged forms and asexual/sexual coloration and exaggerated morphologies. Hormones, reproduction in aphids, wing and body color variants in especially juvenile hormone and ecdy steroids are butterflies, male horn dimorphism in beetles, and caste important factors underlying the generation of dis- polyphenism occurring in the hemimetabolous termites tinct morphologies and reproductive strategies, and and holometabolous hymenopterans. 11.1. Polyphenism and Polymorphism: Discontinuity in the Variation of Insects 464 11.2. Polyphenism in the Hemimetabola 465 11.2.1. Hemiptera/Homoptera Wing Polyphenism 465 11.2.2. Orthoptera 470 11.2.3. “Isoptera” (Termites) — Caste Polyphenism in the Hemimetabola 476 11.3. Polyphenism in the Holometabola 479 11.3.1. Lepidoptera 479 11.3.2. Coleoptera — Male Dimorphism for Weaponry 484 11.3.3. Hymenoptera — Caste Polyphenism and Division of Labor 487 11.4. Synthesis and Perspectives 501 11.1. Polyphenism and Polymorphism: Discontinuity in the Variation of Insects focus on relatively discrete or discontinuous variation in Historically, the terms polymorphism and polyphen- phenotype expression. -
Klónok Herbivor Rovarközösségei Különös Tekintettel a Populus Nigra Származásokra
10.13147/NYME.2012.027 DOKTORI (PhD) ÉRTEKEZÉS KÜLÖNBÖZŐ NYÁRFAJOK ÉS -KLÓNOK HERBIVOR ROVARKÖZÖSSÉGEI KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A POPULUS NIGRA SZÁRMAZÁSOKRA Készült a Nyugat -magyarországi Egyetem Roth Gyula Erdészeti és Vadgazdálkodási Tudományok Doktori Iskolája E1 Erdei ökoszisztémák ökológiája és diverzitása program keretében Tuba Katalin Témavezető: Dr. Lakatos Ferenc Sorszám: 283 Sopron, 2012 10.13147/NYME.2012.027 KÜLÖNBÖZŐ NYÁRFAJOK ÉS -KLÓNOK HERBIVOR ROVARKÖZÖSSÉGEI KÜLÖNÖS TEKINTETTEL A POPULUS NIGRA SZÁRMAZÁSOKRA Értekezés doktori (PhD)fokozat elnyerése érdekében *a Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Roth Gyula Erdészeti és Vadgazdálkodási Tudományok Doktori Iskolája E1 Erdei ökoszisztémák ökológiája és diverzitása progra mja Írta: Tuba Katalin ** Készült a Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Roth Gyula Erdészeti és Vadgazdálkodási Tudományok Doktori Iskol a E1 Erdei ökoszisztémák ökológiája és diverzitása progra mja keretében Témavezető: Dr. Lakatos Ferenc Elfogadásra javaslom (igen/nem) A jelölt a doktori szigorlaton ………%-ot ért el, Sopron/Mosonm agyaróvár , ……………………………………. a Szigorlati Bizottság elnöke Az értekezést bírálóként elfogadásra javaslom (igen/nem) Első bíráló (Dr…………………… ………………) igen/nem Második bíráló (Dr…………………… ………………) igen/nem (Esetleg harmadik bíráló (Dr…………………… ………………)) igen/nem A jelölt az értekezés nyilvános vitáján…………% -ot ért el Sopron/Moson magyaróvár , .…………………………………. a Bírálóbizottság elnöke A doktori (PhD) oklevél minősítése…………………………………….. ……………………………… Az EDT elnöke 10.13147/NYME.2012.027 Tartalomjegyzék Kivonat -
Study of Adaptations of Aphids (Homoptera, Aphidinea) to Ants: Comparative Analysis of Myrmecophilous and Nonmyrmecophilous Species T
Entomological Review, Vol. 82, No. 5, 2002, pp. 569–576. Translated from Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 81, No. 5, 2002. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2002 by Novgorodova. English Translation Copyright © 2002 by MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” (Russia). Study of Adaptations of Aphids (Homoptera, Aphidinea) to Ants: Comparative Analysis of Myrmecophilous and Nonmyrmecophilous Species T. A. Novgorodova Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630091 Russia Received June 21, 2001 Abstract—Behavioral patterns of 4 obligatory myrmecophilous and 4 nonmyrmecophylous aphid species from the families Drepanosiphidae, Aphididae, and Lachnidae were studied in nature in the forest-park zone of the Novosi- birsk Scientific Center in 1998–1999. All these species form no galls. Observations were accompanied by an indi- vidual marking of insects. The behavioral repertoires of myrmecophilous and nonmyrmecophylous species are sig- nificantly different. Defensive reactions are absent in the behavior of obligatory myrmecophilous species. Their be- havior includes only elements of adaptation to trophobiosis; most of these are aimed to attract ants and communi- cate with them. The behavior of nonmyrmecophylous species is more flexible and diverse. It includes some ele- ments of passive defense, from jumping off a plant to demonstration of “aggressive” poses, allowing them, at least partly, to avoid predators. Aphids (Homoptera, Aphidinea) are small insects tubules (siphons), these being reduced in myrmecophi- feeding on plant juices. The group is characterized by lous forms. Moreover, a preanal corolla of hairs, found complicated life cycle, with cyclic parthenogenesis. in myrmecophilous species, helps to keep a honeydew With the environment conditions changing, aphids can drop till the appearance of an ant. -
The Ecology of Inquilinism in Communally Parasitic Tamalia Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
ECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY The Ecology of Inquilinism in Communally Parasitic Tamalia Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) DONALD G. MILLER III1 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Chico, CA 95929Ð0515 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97(6): 1233Ð1241 (2004) ABSTRACT I report the Þrst example of communal parasitism in galling aphids and quantify the effects of gall invasion by the inquiline aphid Tamalia inquilina Miller on its host, Tamalia coweni (Cockerell). On populations of the host plants Arctostaphylos spp., both T. coweni and T. inquilina exhibited facultatively communal behavior and co-occupied galls with no apparent agonistic inter- actions. Although total reproductive output of adult offspring was similar between galls containing T. coweni alone and galls with both species, the allocation of brood was skewed toward that of the inquiline; hence, T. inquilina is a parasite of T. coweni. The presence of T. inquilina had no signiÞcant effect on survivorship of T. coweni in mixed-species galls. T. inquilina successfully reproduced in open galls abandoned by T. coweni, and under these circumstances was best characterized as commensal rather than parasitic. My data indicated T. inquilina was signiÞcantly more likely to move between galls, supporting the hypothesis that the inquiline actively seeks galls to invade. As frequent occupants of unsealed galls, T. inquilina may incur higher risks of predation and desiccation than T. coweni: experimental evidence showed that at least one specialist predator preferred T. coweni to T. inquilina and that T. inquilina withstood experimental dessication for signiÞcantly longer periods than did T. coweni. I suggest the distinctive morphology of T. inquilina is a correlate of the ecology of its parasitic life history on T. -
Biology, Feeding Potential, Standardization of Mass Production Techniques and Impact Study of Dipha Aphidivora Meyrick
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION e ISSN-0976-6855 | Visit us : www.researchjournal.co.in VOLUME 7 | ISSUE 2 | OCTOBER, 2014 | 302-311 IJPP RESEARCH PAPER DOI : 10.15740/HAS/IJPP/7.2/302-311 Biology, feeding potential, standardization of mass production techniques and impact study of Dipha aphidivora Meyrick MYTHRI1, S. PRADEEP2 AND S.V. HUGAR*3 1Raitha Samparka Kendra, Annigeri, DHARWAD (KARNATAKA) INDIA 2University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, SHIMOGA (KARNATAKA) INDIA 3Agri-Business and Export Knowledge Centre, University of Agricultural Sciences, DHARWAD (KARNATAKA) INDIA ARITCLE INFO ABSTRACT Received : 21.03.2014 Experiments were conducted on the biology, feeding potential and standardization of the Revised : 23.07.2014 mass production of Dipha aphidivora Meyrick predator on sugarcane woolly aphid, Accepted : 07.08.2014 Ceratovacuna lanigera Zehntner during 2005-2007, at Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Honnavile, Shimoga (district), Karnataka, India. The duration of the first instar was 2.5 to KEY WORDS : 3.5 days (average 2.95+0.90 days). The average duration of second, third, fourth and fifth Ceratovacuna laniger, Dipha instar, pupal period, adult female and male moth lasted for 4.57+1.33, 8.30+1.11, 11.37+2.96 aphidivora, Biology, Mass production, and 6.10+0.77 days, 8.50+2.15 days, 4.5+0.50 days, 1.5±0.30 days, respectively and the total Feeding potential larval period lasted for 24.5 to 39.5 days. The daily consumption rate by D. aphidivora was 30.8 aphids per day. D. aphidivora or aphid multiplied faster on 7-month-old crop than 5, 6 and 8 month old crop.