HIRA 2014 Page | 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HIRA 2014 Page | 1 2014 Northwest Territories Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Vanguard EMC Inc. 1/1/2014 Acknowledgements This study was made possible by a contribution of funding through the Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada Climate Change Adaptation Program, Government of the Northwest Territories Partnership. Statement of Limitations The information contained in this document is the application of Vanguard EMC Inc.’s professional expertise and where applicable professional opinion, subject to the accuracy and content of available information and the scope of work. The user of this information accepts full responsibility for any errors or omissions contained therein. Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 3 2 OVERVIEW OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES ........................................................................... 8 2.1 SETTING ......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 POPULATION ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 ECONOMY ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 EMERGING ISSUES ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 CLIMATE CHANGE .......................................................................................................................... 10 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 12 3.2 SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................... 12 3.3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.3.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2 Step #1 - Hazard Identification ............................................................................................. 15 3.3.3 Step #2 - Risk Assessment ................................................................................................... 15 3.3.4 Step #3 - Risk Analysis ......................................................................................................... 16 3.3.5 Step #4 - Monitor and Review ............................................................................................... 17 4 HAZARDS IDENTIFIED ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.1 NATURAL HAZARDS ....................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 HUMAN-INDUCED HAZARDS ............................................................................................................ 19 5 HAZARD NARRATIVES .................................................................................................................... 20 5.1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ..................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 VERY HIGH HAZARD ...................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.1 Fire/Explosion ........................................................................................................................ 21 5.2.2 Flood ....................................................................................................................................... 27 5.3 HIGH HAZARD ............................................................................................................................... 32 5.3.1 Weather – Winter Storm ........................................................................................................ 32 5.3.2 Transportation Accidents ..................................................................................................... 35 5.3.3 Critical Infrastructure Failure – Energy Crisis .................................................................... 39 5.3.4 Critical Infrastructure Failure - Other .................................................................................. 42 5.3.5 Critical Infrastructure Failure - Water Contamination ....................................................... 46 5.3.6 Weather – Other Extreme ...................................................................................................... 49 5.4 MODERATE HAZARD ...................................................................................................................... 52 5.4.1 Industrial Emergency ............................................................................................................ 52 5.4.2 Weather – Wind Storm .......................................................................................................... 55 5.4.3 Human Disease ...................................................................................................................... 58 5.4.4 Ice Hazard ............................................................................................................................... 60 5.4.5 Snow Load Hazard ................................................................................................................ 62 5.4.6 Earth Movement – Permafrost Degradation ....................................................................... 64 5.4.7 Civil Unrest ............................................................................................................................. 67 5.4.8 Earth Movement - Other ........................................................................................................ 69 5.5 LOW HAZARD ................................................................................................................................ 73 5.5.1 Earth Movement – Earthquake/Tsunami ............................................................................. 73 5.5.2 War and International Incident ............................................................................................. 77 NWT HIRA 2014 Page | 1 5.5.3 Food and Agricultural Emergency ....................................................................................... 79 5.5.4 Falling Debris ......................................................................................................................... 81 6 VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 83 6.1 RESILIENCE ................................................................................................................................... 83 6.2 VULNERABILITY FACTORS .............................................................................................................. 84 6.2.1 Social Vulnerability ............................................................................................................... 85 6.2.2 Language Groups .................................................................................................................... 86 6.2.3 Age Groups ............................................................................................................................ 86 6.2.4 Disability ................................................................................................................................. 86 6.3 CRITICAL FACILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 87 6.4 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................................................... 87 6.4.1 Energy and Utilities ............................................................................................................... 89 6.4.2 Communications and Information Technology .................................................................. 92 6.4.3 Finance ................................................................................................................................... 93 6.4.4 Health Care ............................................................................................................................. 94 6.4.5 Food ........................................................................................................................................ 95 6.4.6 Water ....................................................................................................................................... 96 6.4.7 Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 97 6.4.8 Safety .................................................................................................................................... 104 6.4.9 Government.......................................................................................................................... 104 6.4.10 Industry ................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Last Putt of 2020
    No changes planned after ENR shooting Fort Simpson man wants more firearms training for wildlife officers 1257+:(677(55,725,(6 Two-school educator recognized Volume 75 Issue 19 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2020 $.95 (plus GST) Homes razed by fires in Inuvik Premier creates 150- job Covid secretariat 'The Dope Experience' hits Inuvik Last putt of 2020 Eric Bowling/NNSL photo Kevin McLeod lines up a perfect putt. Roads End Golf Club in Inuvik closed out its summer with a bang, hosting a mixed tournament that drew 15 teams to com- pete for the final glory of the year on Aug. 27 to 28. See more photos on page 15. Publication mail Contract #40012157 "I thank all of you for adapting to keep each other safe." 7 71605 00200 2 – Chief public health officer Kami Kandola points to the success of the school year this far, page 6. 2 NEWS/NORTH NWT, Monday, September 7, 2020 news Five MLAs stayed home from caucus retreat in Fort Smith Many cited personal reasons for not attending by Blair McBride Jackson Lafferty, MLA for Monfwi, con- Northern News Services firmed to NNSL Media that he wasn't present NWT for the event for personal reasons. Members of the legislative assembly held Rocky Simpson, MLA for Hay River their caucus retreat in Fort Smith from Aug. South, was the fifth member who missed the 28 to 31, but five MLAs didn't attend. gathering of legislators as he was travelling Katrina Nokleby, MLA for Great Slave, outside of the territory, said a representative announced in a Facebook post on Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Impact-Generated Deposition
    EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT-GENERATED DEPOSITION ON THE LATE EOCENE SHORES OF GEORGIA by ROBERT SCOTT HARRIS (Under the direction of Michael F. Roden) ABSTRACT Modeling demonstrates that the Late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact would have been capable of depositing ejecta in east-central Georgia with thicknesses exceeding thirty centimeters. A coarse sand layer at the base of the Upper Eocene Dry Branch Formation was examined for shocked minerals. Universal stage measurements demonstrate that planar fabrics in some fine to medium sand-size quartz grains are parallel to planes commonly exploited by planar deformation features (PDF’s) in shocked quartz. Possible PDF’s are observed parallel to {10-13}, {10-11}, {10-12}, {11-22} and {51-61}. Petrographic identification of shocked quartz is supported by line broadening in X-ray diffraction experiments. Other impact ejecta recognized include possible ballen quartz, maskelynite, and reidite-bearing zircon grains. The layer is correlative with an unusual diamictite that contains goethite spherules similar to altered microkrystites. It may represent an impact-generated debris flow. These discoveries suggest that the Chesapeake Bay impact horizon is preserved in Georgia. The horizon also should be the source stratum for Georgia tektites. INDEX WORDS: Chesapeake Bay impact, Upper Eocene, Shocked quartz, Impact shock, Shocked zircon, Impact, Impact ejecta, North American tektites, Tektites, Georgiaites, Georgia Tektites, Planar deformation features, PDF’s, Georgia, Geology, Coastal Plain, Stratigraphy, Impact stratigraphy, Impact spherules, Goethite spherules, Diamictite, Twiggs Clay, Dry Branch Formation, Clinchfield Sand, Irwinton Sand, Reidite, Microkrystite, Cpx Spherules, Impact debris flow EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT-GENERATED DEPOSITION ON THE LATE EOCENE SHORES OF GEORGIA by ROBERT SCOTT HARRIS B.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants and Contributions
    TABLED DOCUMENT 287-18(3) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2017 – 2018 Subventions et Contributions Le present document contient la traduction française du résumé et du message du ministre Rapport 2017 – 2018 October 2018 | Octobre 2018 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree Tłı̨chǫ yatı k’ę̀ę̀. Dı wegodı newǫ dè, gots’o gonede. Tłı̨chǫ Ɂerıhtł’ıś Dëne Sųłıné yatı t’a huts’elkër xa beyáyatı theɂą ɂat’e, nuwe ts’ën yółtı. Chipewyan Edı gondı dehgáh got’ı̨e zhatıé k’ę́ę́ edatł’éh enahddhę nıde naxets’ę́ edahłı.́ South Slavey K’áhshó got’ı̨ne xǝdǝ k’é hederı ɂedı̨htl’é yerınıwę nı ́dé dúle. North Slavey Jii gwandak izhii ginjìk vat’atr’ijąhch’uu zhit yinohthan jì’, diits’àt ginohkhìi. Gwich’in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Indigenous Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ............................................................. i MESSAGE DU MINISTRE .......................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Chief Plebiscite Officer Report to the Legislative Assembly of The
    REPORT OF THE CHIEF PLEBISCITE OFFICER to the Legislative Assembly on the Administrative Conduct of the IVIAV 4, 992� PLEBISCITE TABLE OF CONTENTS fABlED DOCUMENT NO. - (3) TABLED ON FEB 2 2 1993 Letter of Transmittal ............................................... 2 7. Use of Aboriginal Languages ............................. 9 a) Languages Used on the Ballot .......................... 9 1. Introduction .......................................................... 3 b) Plebiscite Act and Regulations ......................... 9 a) Question on the Ballot.. ..................................... 3 8. Issues Arising During the Plebiscite ............... 10 b) Eligibility of Voters ........................................... 4 c) Plebiscite Offices................................................ 4 a) Vouching forUnlisted Voters .......................... IO b) Requests for Registration by Saskatchewan 2. Preparation for the Plebiscite ........................... .4 Trappers ........................................................... 10 c) Potential Flooding in Fort Simpson ............... 10 3. Plebiscite Direction and Proclamation ............ 5 9. Recommendations .............................................. 11 a) Appointment of ReturningOfficers .................. 5 b) Additional Assistant Returning Officers.......... 5 a) Recommendations for Legislative Changes ... 11 c) Information About the Plebiscite ...................... 5 i) Creation of a "Special Ballot" .................. 11 d) The Iqaluit Plebiscite Office............................
    [Show full text]
  • CZN Comments on Final Arguments
    September 16, 2011 Chuck Hubert Environmental Assessment Officer Mackenzie Valley Review Board Suite 200, 5102 50th Avenue, Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N7 Dear Mr. Hubert RE: Environmental Assessment EA0809-002, Prairie Creek Mine Comments on Final Arguments Canadian Zinc Corporation (CZN) is pleased to provide the attached comments on the Final Arguments submitted by parties at the conclusion of environmental assessment EA0809-002. Technical replies are provided, where necessary, by stating CZN’s position with respect to recommendations made. Where recommendations are unchanged from Technical Reports, the Review Board is directed to CZN’s comments on Technical Reports in Attachment 1. The contents of Attachment 1 should be read first since context is provided for some of our responses to the Final Arguments. Please note that our comments on Technical Reports contain no new information, and no timeline was provided by the Review Board for their submission. Also attached is a final commitments table (Table 1), and the curricula vitae of the main individual consultants who provided deliverables for the environmental assessment process. Yours truly, CANADIAN ZINC CORPORATION David P. Harpley, P. Geo. VP, Environment and Permitting Affairs Suite 1710-650 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6B 4N9 Tel: (604) 688-2001 Fax: (604) 688-2043 E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.canadianzinc.com COMMENTS ON PARTY FINAL ARGUMENTS Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) Water Management and Storage Recommendation 2: Final selection of an additional water storage option must be done in conjunction with the determination of Site Specific Water Quality Objectives for Prairie Creek. If increased capacity associated with construction of an additional pond provides for the ability to meet Reference Condition Approach benchmarks as defined within the derivation process, that option must be selected and implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Gold Prices Rouse Interest in NWT Deposits Prices Reached $2,000 US Per Ounce for the First Time Ever Earlier This Month
    Record gold prices rouse interest in NWT deposits Prices reached $2,000 US per ounce for the first time ever earlier this month 1257+:(677(55,725,(6 ENR looks into struck black bear Volume 75 Issue 16 MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2020 $.95 (plus GST) Overdue Delta fun Lawrence Norbert photo Fort Good Hope elders Thomas Manuel and John Cochilli play Molly and Me at the Saturday evening outdoor talent show during the Tsiigehtchic Canoe Daze festival over the Aug. 8 weekend. Artist's Unlimited Curling beaded internet bonspiels mask coming to cancelled selected communities for exhibit Publication mail Contract #40012157 "The land provides us with so much and in reciprocity we must give back." 7 71605 00200 2 –Columnist Catherine Lafferty reflects on the bounty, and beauty, of our Northern landscape, page 11. 2 NEWS/NORTH NWT, Monday, August 17, 2020 feature news NEWS/NORTH NWT, Monday, August 17, 2020 3 Did we get it wrong? News/North is committed to getting facts and names right. With that goes a commitment to acknowledge mistakes and run corrections. If you spot an error in News/North, call (867) 873-4031 and ask to speak to an editor, or email editorial@ nnsl.com. We'll get a correction or clarification in as soon as we can. BIRTHDAY WISHES NEWS Long-time Hay River resident Peter Briefs Osted turned 80 NWT government launches years of age on tourism recovery fund Aug. 13, and his The Department of Industry, Tourism and wife, Marge Osted, Investment (ITI) announced that it is partner- is inviting the com- ing with the federal government to launch a munity to help wish funding program for tourism operators affect- him a happy birth- ed by the Covid-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • NWT Transportation Report Card 2015 Is Intended to Provide a Statistical Benchmark of Progress Achieved and an Evaluation Framework to Measure Future Progress
    TABLED DOCUMENT 345-17(5) TABLED ON OCTOBER 7, 2015 Table of Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................3 Strengthening Connections .....................................................................................................5 Capturing Opportunities ...........................................................................................................9 Embracing Innovation ............................................................................................................ 11 Metrics & Data .........................................................................................................................13 1.0 Financial .................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Capital and O&M Expenditures and Revenue .............................................. 13 1.2 Analysis of Capital Needs ............................................................................ 14 1.3 Major Partnership Funding ........................................................................... 15 1.4 Airport, Road Licensing and Deh Cho Bridge Toll Revenues ....................... 16 1.5 Northern, Local, Other, contracts and Total Value of Contracts .................... 18 1.6 Community Access Program Expenditures ................................................. 18 2.0 Airports ....................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Land and Resource Management Devolution in the Northwest Territories
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Master of Public Policy Capstone Projects 2015-09 An Analysis of Land and Resource Management Devolution in the Northwest Territories McLauchlan, Sydney McLauhclan, Sydney. (2014). An Analysis of Land and Resource Management Devolution in the Northwest Territories ( Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51643 report Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY CAPSTONE PROJECT An Analysis of Land and Resource Management Devolution in the Northwest Territories Is Evolution needed prior to effective Devolution? Submitted by: Sydney McLauchlan Approved by Supervisor: Ted Morton Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of PPOL 623 and completion of the requirements for the Master of Public Policy degree Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 Part 1: Demographics, Devolution History and Current Governance Structure in the Northwest Territories .............................................................................................. 9 1.1 Demographics .................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Devolution History and Current Structure ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Seeking Unanimous Consent Consensus Government in the Northwest Territories By Stephen J. Dunbar, B.A.H. A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario Canada © Stephen J. Dunbar, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43456-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43456-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • EA1415-01 Developer's Assessment Report
    DEVELOPER’S ASSESSMENT REPORT ALL SEASON ROAD PROJECT PRAIRIE CREEK MINE MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 3 SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF: Environmental Assessment of Prairie Creek Mine EA 1415-01 SUBMITTED TO: Mackenzie Valley Review Board Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N7 SUBMITTED BY: Canadian Zinc Corporation Vancouver, BC V6B 4N9 April 2015 PROJECT FACT SHEET CORPORATE DATA Project Name Prairie Creek Mine Company Name and Address Canadian Zinc Corporation Suite 1710, 650 West Georgia Street Vancouver, B.C., V6B 4N9 Telephone: (604) 688-2001 Fax: (604) 688-2043 Canadian Zinc Corporation 9926-101st Avenue PO Box 500 Fort Simpson, NT X0E 0N0 Telephone: (867) 695-3963 Fax: (867) 695-3964 Contacts Alan Taylor, Chief Operating Officer and VP Exploration David Harpley, VP Environment & Permitting Affairs Wilbert Antoine, Manager of Northern Development COMMUNITY DATA First Nation Territory Nahanni Butte Dene Band, Dehcho Nearest Community Nahanni Butte, 95 km south-east Other Communities Fort Liard, 165 km south-east Fort Simpson, 185 km east Land Claims Status In negotiation, Dehcho Process PROJECT DETAILS Location 550 km west of Yellowknife, NWT 61°33’ N latitude, 124°48’ W longitude Undertaking ~185 km all season road to the Liard Highway essentially using the existing, permitted winter road alignment Prairie Creek All Season Road Project – April 2015 1 GONDI AEK’ÉHZE ADLÁ Gondi Éhgonñæá Dii Prairie Creek Mine góhts’edi tå’a Góhdli Ndehé k’eh yunahnee tå’uh nît’i ii gots’ç xôh shíhtah á goæô. Káa azhô t’áh Canadian Zinc Corporation (CZN) gots’êh á agøht’e. K’õô 1980 kéhonñdhe ekúh á ndéh gozhíhe gots’êh satsõ kázhe gha seegúdlá agøht’e t’áh t’ahsíi met’áh alaeda thela á agøht’e.
    [Show full text]
  • NWT/NU Spills Working Agreement
    NORTHWEST TERRITORIES–NUNAVUT SPILLS WORKING AGREEMENT Updated October 2014 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Content Page Cover Front Cover 1 Cover Inside Front Cover 2 Introductory Table of Contents 3 Introductory Record of Amendments 3 1. Introduction/Purpose/Goals 4 2. Parties to the Agreement 5 3. Letter of Agreement 6 - Background 6 - Lead Agency Designation and Contact 6 - Lead Agency Responsibilities 6 - General 7 4. Signatures of Parties to the Agreement 8 5. Glossary of Terms 9 Table 1A Lead Agency Designation for Spills in the NT and NU 10 Table 1B Lead Agency Designation for NT Airport Spills 14 Table 1C Lead Agency Designation for NU Airport Spills 14 Table 1D Territorial Roads and Highways in the NT 15 Table 1E Territorial Roads in NU 15 Table 2 General Guidelines for Assessing Spill Significance and Spill File Closure 16 Table 3 Spill Line Contract and Operation 17 Appendix A Schedule 1 - Reportable Quantities for NT-NU Spills 18 Appendix B Spill Line Report Form 20 Appendix C Instructions for Completing the NT/NU Spill Report Form 21 Appendix D Environmental Emergencies Science Table (Science Table) 22 RECORD OF AMENDMENTS * No. Amendment Description Entered By / Date Approved By / Date 1 GNWT spills response structure changed on April 1. 2014 to reflect the changes of devolution. Departments of Industry Tourism and Investment and Lands were added to the NT/NU SWA 2 Environment Canada nationally restructured their spill response structure in 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 * Starting in 2015, the NT/NU SWA will be reviewed and updated annually during the Fall NT/NU Spills Working Group meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Structures and Events – a Nordic Perspective
    107 by Henning Dypvik1, Jüri Plado2, Claus Heinberg3, Eckart Håkansson4, Lauri J. Pesonen5, Birger Schmitz6, and Selen Raiskila5 Impact structures and events – a Nordic perspective 1 Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, NO 0316 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. 3 Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, P.O. Box 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. 4 Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. 5 Division of Geophysics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland. 6 Department of Geology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden. Impact cratering is one of the fundamental processes in are the main reason that the Nordic countries are generally well- the formation of the Earth and our planetary system, as mapped. reflected, for example in the surfaces of Mars and the Impact craters came into the focus about 20 years ago and the interest among the Nordic communities has increased during recent Moon. The Earth has been covered by a comparable years. The small Kaalijärv structure of Estonia was the first impact number of impact scars, but due to active geological structure to be confirmed in northern Europe (Table 1; Figures 1 and processes, weathering, sea floor spreading etc, the num- 7). First described in 1794 (Rauch), the meteorite origin of the crater ber of preserved and recognized impact craters on the field (presently 9 craters) was proposed much later in 1919 (Kalju- Earth are limited.
    [Show full text]