Maternal Use of Psychiatric Medications During Pregnancy And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maternal Use of Psychiatric Medications During Pregnancy And MATERNAL USE OF PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS DURING PREGNANCY AND ADVERSE BIRTH OUTCOMES AND NEURODEVELOPMENTAL PROBLEMS IN OFFSPRING Ayesha C. Sujan Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University July 2021 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee _______________________________________________ Brian M. D’Onofrio, PhD _______________________________________________ Richard Viken, PhD _______________________________________________ Patrick D. Quinn, PhD _______________________________________________ Christina Ludema, PhD _______________________________________________ A. Sara Oberg, PhD, MD April 22nd, 2020 iii © 2021 Ayesha C. Sujan iv Ayesha Sujan MATERNAL USE OF PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS DURING PREGNANCY AND ADVERSE BIRTH OUTCOMES AND NEURODEVELOPMENTAL PROBLEMS IN OFFSPRING Understanding consequences of prenatal exposure to psychiatric and analgesic medications is important because use of these medications among pregnant women is relatively common and increasing. Rodent experiments have shown effects of perinatal exposure to specific medications; however, these findings might not apply to humans. Human observational studies have been used to study prenatal exposure to psychiatric and analgesic medications rather than randomiZed control trials due to ethical concerns about exposing offspring to potentially harmful substances. However, it is unclear the extent to which the statistical associations documented in observational studies are due to causal mechanisms or background factors that differ among exposed and unexposed pregnancies (i.e., confounding factors). Therefore, the aim of my dissertation research was to evaluate consequences of prenatal exposure to psychiatric and analgesic medications on risk for adverse birth outcomes and neurodevelopmental problems by seeking converging evidence from multiple observational designs that target both measured and unmeasured confounding. The first study showed that after accounting for confounding, prenatal antidepressant exposure was associated with a small increased risk of preterm birth (PTB) but no increased risk of small for gestational age (SGA), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The second study suggested that observed associations between prenatal exposure to prescribed opioid analgesics (POAs) and risk for PTB and SGA were largely due to unmeasured confounding factors, although I could not rule out small independent associations. The third v study evaluated the consequences of combined exposure to POAs and selective-serotine reuptake inhibitor antidepressants on risk for PTB and SGA and suggested that the medications do not interact to increase the risk of either outcome. These findings may provide reassurance to women considering antidepressant and POA use during pregnancy. They also highlight the importance of screening pregnant women and women of childbearing age and providing evidence-based treatments to at-risk women. vi Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………… Page 1 Background………………………………………………………………… Page 2 Potential processes influencing associations with prenatal psychiatric medication exposure………………………………………………………... Page 4 Observation methods to study the consequences of maternal medication use during pregnancy……………………………………………………….. Page 6 Dissertation research………………………………………………………... Page 12 Table I.1. Swedish Registers……………………………………………….. Page 16 Figure I.1. HypothesiZed influences on neurodevelopmental outcomes…… Page 17 References…………………………………………………………………... Page 18 II. Paper 1: Associations of maternal antidepressant use during the first trimester of pregnancy with preterm birth, small for gestational age, autism spectrum disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring…………………. Page 32 Abstract……………………………………………………………………... Page 33 Introduction…………………………………………………………………. Page 35 Methods…………………………………………………………………….. Page 36 Results………………………………………………………………………. Page 41 Discussion…………………………………………………………………... Page 45 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….. Page 48 Figure II.1. Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder by Maternal Self-reported First-trimester Exposure. …………………………………………………………………... Page 49 Table II.1. Descriptive statistics in the whole sample and stratified by maternal self-reported first-trimester use of any antidepressant……………. Page 50 Table II.2. Baseline, adjusted, and sibling comparison associations between maternal self-reported first-trimester use and birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes……………………………………………... Page 52 Table II.3. Adjusted associations between maternal antidepressant dispensations before pregnancy and during the first trimester of pregnancy and birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes………………………………. Page 53 Table II.4. Baseline associations between paternal first-trimester antidepressant dispensations and birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes... Page 54 References…………………………………………………………………... Page 55 SII.1 Appendix: Descriptive Statistics Based on Maternal Self-reported Antidepressant Use…………………………………………………………. Page 60 SII.2 Appendix: Descriptive Statistics and Analyses Based on Antidepressant Dispensation Records……………………………………… Page 68 SII.3 Appendix: Test of Exposure Misclassification……………………….. Page 80 SII.4 Appendix: Test of GeneraliZability of Sibling Comparisons…………. Page 83 SII.5 Appendix: Test of Confounding from Exposure to Other Psychotropic Medications…………………………………………………... Page 85 SII.6 Appendix: Test of Bias from Left Censoring and Cohort Effects……. Page 91 SII.7 Appendix: Test of Validity of Early Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnoses……………………… Page 93 vii SII.8 Appendix: Associations Between Dispensations During Later Pregnancy and Offspring Outcomes Among Those with a First-trimester Dispensation………………………………………………………………... Page 96 III. Paper 2: Maternal prescribed opioid analgesic use during pregnancy and associations with adverse birth outcomes: A population-based study……………… Page 99 Abstract……………………………………………………………………... Page 100 Introduction…………………………………………………………………. Page 102 Methods…………………………………………………………………….. Page 103 Results……………………………………………………………………..... Page 111 Discussion…………………………………………………………………... Page 115 Table III.1. Demographics in the target sample……………………………. Page 119 Table III.2. Proportion of infants with prescribed opioid analgesic and acetaminophen exposure in the analytic sample…………………………… Page 122 Table III.3. Associations between prescribed opioid analgesic exposure and adverse birth outcomes………………………………………………… Page 123 References…………………………………………………………………... Page 124 SIII.1 Appendix: STROBE Checklist………………………………………. Page 131 SIII.2 Appendix: Planned analyses…………………………………………. Page 133 SIII.3 Appendix: Additional information on medication exposures……….. Page 137 SIII.4 Appendix: Preliminary analyses exploring for sensitive periods of exposure…………………………………………………………………….. Page 142 SIII.5 Appendix: Review of models used to evaluate associations between prescribed opioid analgesic use and birth outcomes………………………... Page 144 SIII.6 Appendix: All parameter estimates from adjusted models estimating associations with maternal prescribed opioid filled prescriptions anytime during pregnancy…………………………………………………………… Page 147 SIII.7 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating for potential bias from exposure misclassification…………………………………………………. Page 152 SIII.8 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating the influence of type of opioid……………………………………………………………………….. Page 155 SIII.9 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating influence of inclusion of combination prescribed opioid analgesic medications…………………… Page 157 SIII.10 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating the role of polypharmacy Page 159 SIII.11 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating assumptions of sibling comparisons results…………………………………………………………. Page 161 SIII.12 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating associations with continuous outcomes……………………………………………………….. Page 164 SIII.13 Appendix: Sensitivity analyses evaluating the influence of missing data………………………………………………………………………….. Page 166 SIII.14 Appendix: Prevalence of the covariates stratified by exposure status in the target sample…………………………………………………... Page 168 SIII.15 Appendix: Prevalence of preterm birth and small for gestational age among all exposure and comparison groups…………………………… Page 172 IV. Paper 3: A Population-based study of concurrent prescriptions of opioid analgesic and selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications during pregnancy and risk for adverse birth outcomes Page 174 viii Abstract……………………………………………………………………... Page 175 Introduction………………………………………………………………… Page 177 Methods…………………………………………………………………….. Page 178 Results……………………………………………………………………..... Page 182 Discussion…………………………………………………………………... Page 183 Table IV.1. Prevalence of exposure groups, background characteristics, and outcomes in the target sample (n=688,914) …………………………… Page 188 Table IV.2. Preterm birth…………………………………………………… Page 191 Table IV.3. Small for gestational age………………………………………. Page 192 References…………………………………………………………………... Page 193 sTable IV.1. Other psychiatric medication anatomical therapeutic class codes………………………………………………………………………... Page 200 sTable IV.2.
Recommended publications
  • World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Mathur Et Al
    World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Mathur et al . World Journal of Pharmaceutical SJIF ResearchImpact Factor 8.074 Volume 7, Issue 16, 111-124. Review Article ISSN 2277– 7105 ADRS DUE TO ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS: A REVIEW Prashant Mathur*1 and Waseem Yahya2 1,2Department of Pharmacy Practice Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Technology and Science, Patel Nagar (248001), Dehradun, Uttarakhand. INTRODUCTION Article Received on 28 June 2018, WHO defines an ADR as ―any response to a drug which is noxious and Revised on 18 July 2018, unintended, and which occurs at doses normally used in man for Accepted on 08 August 2018, DOI: 10.20959/wjpr201816-12706 prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modification of physiological function‖.[1] The antipsychotic drugs are chemically *Corresponding Author diverse but have the common property of alleviating the symptoms of [2] Prashant Mathur organic as well as functional psychosis. Antipsychotics are among Department of Pharmacy the most effective drugs used in psychiatry in the maintenance therapy Practice Shri Guru Ram Rai of schizophrenia, mania, or in acute psychotic reactions.[3] These drugs Institute of Technology and are also capable of causing a wide range of potential adverse drug Science, Patel Nagar (248001), Dehradun, reactions that can lead to non-compliance that can impair quality of Uttarakhand. life, may cause stigma and physical morbidity which may lead to discontinuation of medication and in extreme cases may be fatal.[4] Antipsychotic drugs have a high therapeutic
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
    Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta- analysis Leucht S, Corves C, D Arbter, Engel R R, Li C, Davis J M CRD summary The authors concluded that amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone can be effective in treating schizophrenia patients. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs can also result in fewer extrapyramidal side effects, but can induce weight gain. The authors' conclusions reflected the evidence presented, but some potential methodological flaws in the review process meant that the extent to which those conclusions were reliable was unclear. Authors' objectives To compare the effects of first and second-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia patients. Searching The search for eligible studies was started in 2005, including MEDLINE to October 2006, Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Specialised Register and the US Food and Drugs Administration website. Search terms were reported and there were no language restrictions. Previous reviews were searched for additional relevant studies. Study selection Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of oral second-generation antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone and zotepine) compared with first-generation drugs in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders (schizoaffective, schizophreniform or delusional disorders) irrespective of diagnostic criteria were eligible for inclusion in the review. The optimum doses of second-generation drugs were selected
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al
    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Properties and Units in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 479–552, 2000. © 2000 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE SCIENTIFIC DIVISION COMMITTEE ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)# and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY CHEMISTRY AND HUMAN HEALTH DIVISION CLINICAL CHEMISTRY SECTION COMMISSION ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)§ PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES PART XII. PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (Technical Report) (IFCC–IUPAC 1999) Prepared for publication by HENRIK OLESEN1, DAVID COWAN2, RAFAEL DE LA TORRE3 , IVAN BRUUNSHUUS1, MORTEN ROHDE1, and DESMOND KENNY4 1Office of Laboratory Informatics, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Drug Control Centre, London University, King’s College, London, UK; 3IMIM, Dr. Aiguader 80, Barcelona, Spain; 4Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland #§The combined Memberships of the Committee and the Commission (C-NPU) during the preparation of this report (1994–1996) were as follows: Chairman: H. Olesen (Denmark, 1989–1995); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1996); Members: X. Fuentes-Arderiu (Spain, 1991–1997); J. G. Hill (Canada, 1987–1997); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1994–1997); H. Olesen (Denmark, 1985–1995); P. L. Storring (UK, 1989–1995); P. Soares de Araujo (Brazil, 1994–1997); R. Dybkær (Denmark, 1996–1997); C. McDonald (USA, 1996–1997). Please forward comments to: H. Olesen, Office of Laboratory Informatics 76-6-1, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] Republication or reproduction of this report or its storage and/or dissemination by electronic means is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgment, with full reference to the source, along with use of the copyright symbol ©, the name IUPAC, and the year of publication, are prominently visible.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Biological Treatments of Schizophrenia
    Schizophrenia Block Adapted from the American Society for Clinical Psychopharmacology Model Curriculum * Learning Objectives • Identify major target symptoms of schizophrenia treatment • Become familiar with conventional & atypical antipsychotic medications • Recognize major side effects of antipsychotic medications • Recognize unique features of clozapine & depot antipsychotics Outline • Background about Schizophrenia • Dopamine Hypothesis • Dopamine Pathways • Efficacy of Anti-psychotics • Treats agitation • Prevents relapse • Compliance, Medication dose & relapse • Overview of an Antipsychotic Medication Trial • Different Anti-psychotic medications • Side effects of the Anti-psychotics • Common-EPS, TD, anti-cholinergic, metabolic syndrome, • Rare but serious-NMS • Antipsychotic selection and treatment strategies algorithm Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia Dopamine Hypothesis • Psychotic symptoms can be induced by dopamine agonists* • cocaine, amphetamines cause psychosis • All anti-psychotics are dopamine antagonists • Normal subjects-10% dopamine receptors occupied at baseline** • Schizophrenic subjects-20% dopamine receptors occupied at baseline** **Laruelle M, Quart J Nuc Med 1998;42:211 * Major Dopamine Pathways 1. Nigrostriatal tract- (extrapyramidal pathway) substantia nigra to caudate nucleus & putamen of the basal ganglia 2. Mesolimbic tract - midbrain tegmentum to nucleus accumbens & adjacent limbic structures 3. Mesocortical tract - midbrain tegmentum to anterior cortical areas 4. Tuberoinfundibular tract - arcuate &
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Antipsychotic Treatment on Metabolic Function: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    The effects of antipsychotic treatment on metabolic function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Toby Pillinger, Robert McCutcheon, Luke Vano, Katherine Beck, Guy Hindley, Atheeshaan Arumuham, Yuya Mizuno, Sridhar Natesan, Orestis Efthimiou, Andrea Cipriani, Oliver Howes ****PROTOCOL**** Review questions 1. What is the magnitude of metabolic dysregulation (defined as alterations in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) and alterations in body weight and body mass index associated with short-term (‘acute’) antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia? 2. Does baseline physiology (e.g. body weight) and demographics (e.g. age) of patients predict magnitude of antipsychotic-associated metabolic dysregulation? 3. Are alterations in metabolic parameters over time associated with alterations in degree of psychopathology? 1 Searches We plan to search EMBASE, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception using the following terms: 1 (Acepromazine or Acetophenazine or Amisulpride or Aripiprazole or Asenapine or Benperidol or Blonanserin or Bromperidol or Butaperazine or Carpipramine or Chlorproethazine or Chlorpromazine or Chlorprothixene or Clocapramine or Clopenthixol or Clopentixol or Clothiapine or Clotiapine or Clozapine or Cyamemazine or Cyamepromazine or Dixyrazine or Droperidol or Fluanisone or Flupehenazine or Flupenthixol or Flupentixol or Fluphenazine or Fluspirilen or Fluspirilene or Haloperidol or Iloperidone
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Roots of Empathy Program on the Use of Psychotropic Medications Among Youth in Manitoba
    The effect of the Roots of Empathy program on the use of psychotropic medications among youth in Manitoba by Lindsey Dahl A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2017 by Lindsey Dahl Abstract Background: Psychotropic medications prescriptions to youth have increased. Roots of Empathy (ROE) is a social and emotional learning program that may influence the use of psychotropic medication. Methods: Administrative data was analyzed in a matched sample of children who received ROE during 2002/03 to 2012/13. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between ROE and psychotropic medication dispensations. Results: Few significant differences were observed. Children who received ROE in kindergarten to grade 3 had a lower adjusted hazard for an anxiolytic dispensation. Children who received ROE in grade 7 to 8 had a higher hazard for an antipsychotic dispensation. Males who received the program had an increased hazard for an antipsychotic dispensation. Conclusion: There was no consistent differences in the likelihood of being dispensed a psychotropic medication between children who received ROE and children who did not in Manitoba. ii Acknowledgments I would like to first thank my thesis advisor Dr. Randy Fransoo of the Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine at the University of Manitoba. Right from our initial meeting, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • When Taking Medication May Be a Sin: Dietary Requirements and Food Laws
    BJPsych Advances (2015), vol. 21, 425–432 doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.114.012534 When taking medication may be a ARTICLE sin: dietary requirements and food laws in psychotropic prescribing Waqqas A. Khokhar, Simon L. Dein, Mohammed S. Qureshi, Imran Hameed, Mohammed M. Ali, Yasir Abbasi, Hasan Aman & Ruchit Sood In psychiatric practice, it is not uncommon to Waqqas A. Khokhar is a SUMMARY come across patients who refuse any psychiatric consultant psychiatrist with Leicestershire Partnership NHS Religious laws do not usually forbid the use of intervention, placing their faith in a spiritual psychotropic medication, but many do forbid the Trust and an honorary lecturer in recovery enabled by their religious beliefs (Campion the Centre for Ageing and Mental consumption of animal-based derivatives of bovine 1997; Koenig 2001). Although religious laws do Health at Staffordshire University. and/or porcine origin (e.g. gelatin and stearic not usually restrict the taking of psychotropic Simon L. Dein is a senior lecturer acid) such as are found in many medications. at University College London, an Demonstrating awareness of this, combined with medication, many do forbid consumption of the Honorary Clinical Professor at a genuine concern about how it affects the patient, animal derivatives, particularly gelatin and stearic the University of Durham and a may strengthen the doctor–patient relationship acid, that many psychotropics contain. This has consultant psychiatrist with the and avoid non-adherence. In this article, we major implications, for example, for patients who North Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust. Mohammed outline dietary requirements of key religions and follow Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibited Substances List
    Prohibited Substances List This is the Equine Prohibited Substances List that was voted in at the FEI General Assembly in November 2009 alongside the new Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication Regulations(EADCMR). Neither the List nor the EADCM Regulations are in current usage. Both come into effect on 1 January 2010. The current list of FEI prohibited substances remains in effect until 31 December 2009 and can be found at Annex II Vet Regs (11th edition) Changes in this List : Shaded row means that either removed or allowed at certain limits only SUBSTANCE ACTIVITY Banned Substances 1 Acebutolol Beta blocker 2 Acefylline Bronchodilator 3 Acemetacin NSAID 4 Acenocoumarol Anticoagulant 5 Acetanilid Analgesic/anti-pyretic 6 Acetohexamide Pancreatic stimulant 7 Acetominophen (Paracetamol) Analgesic/anti-pyretic 8 Acetophenazine Antipsychotic 9 Acetylmorphine Narcotic 10 Adinazolam Anxiolytic 11 Adiphenine Anti-spasmodic 12 Adrafinil Stimulant 13 Adrenaline Stimulant 14 Adrenochrome Haemostatic 15 Alclofenac NSAID 16 Alcuronium Muscle relaxant 17 Aldosterone Hormone 18 Alfentanil Narcotic 19 Allopurinol Xanthine oxidase inhibitor (anti-hyperuricaemia) 20 Almotriptan 5 HT agonist (anti-migraine) 21 Alphadolone acetate Neurosteriod 22 Alphaprodine Opiod analgesic 23 Alpidem Anxiolytic 24 Alprazolam Anxiolytic 25 Alprenolol Beta blocker 26 Althesin IV anaesthetic 27 Althiazide Diuretic 28 Altrenogest (in males and gelidngs) Oestrus suppression 29 Alverine Antispasmodic 30 Amantadine Dopaminergic 31 Ambenonium Cholinesterase inhibition 32 Ambucetamide Antispasmodic 33 Amethocaine Local anaesthetic 34 Amfepramone Stimulant 35 Amfetaminil Stimulant 36 Amidephrine Vasoconstrictor 37 Amiloride Diuretic 1 Prohibited Substances List This is the Equine Prohibited Substances List that was voted in at the FEI General Assembly in November 2009 alongside the new Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication Regulations(EADCMR).
    [Show full text]
  • NVA237 / Glycopyrronium Bromide Multinational, Multi-Database Drug
    Quantitative Safety & Epidemiology NVA237 / Glycopyrronium bromide Non-interventional Final Study Report NVA237A2401T Multinational, multi-database drug utilization study of inhaled NVA237 in Europe Author Document Status Final Date of final version 28 April 2016 of the study report EU PAS register ENCEPP/SDPP/4845 number Property of Novartis Confidential May not be used, divulged, published or otherwise disclosed without the consent of Novartis NIS Report Template Version 2.0 August-13-2014 Novartis Confidential Page 2 Non-interventional study report NVA237A/Seebri® Breezhaler®/CNVA237A2401T PASS information Title Multinational, multi-database drug utilization study of inhaled NVA237 in Europe –Final Study Report Version identifier of the Version 1.0 final study report Date of last version of 28 April 2016 the final study report EU PAS register number ENCEPP/SDPP/4845 Active substance Glycopyrronium bromide (R03BB06) Medicinal product Seebri®Breezhaler® / Tovanor®Breezhaler® / Enurev®Breezhaler® Product reference NVA237 Procedure number SeebriBreezhaler: EMEA/H/C/0002430 TovanorBreezhaler: EMEA/H/C/0002690 EnurevBreezhaler: EMEA/H/C0002691 Marketing authorization Novartis Europharm Ltd holder Frimley Business Park Camberley GU16 7SR United Kingdom Joint PASS No Research question and In the context of the NVA237 marketing authorization objectives application, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended conditions for marketing authorization and product information and suggested to conduct a post-authorization
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stems in the Selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances
    WHO/PSM/QSM/2006.3 The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances 2006 Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN) Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Medicines Policy and Standards The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]