Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(15) Special 2014, Pages: 7-12

AENSI Journals Advances in Environmental Biology ISSN-1995-0756 EISSN-1998-1066

Journal home page: http://www.aensiweb.com/AEB/

Nitrate Levels in Well Water and Population Health Risk of and Bachok, in Different Planting Phases

Amirah Ahmad Roslan, Shaharuddin Mohamad Sham, Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail

1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra ,43450 Serdang,, Malaysia.

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Background: Many researchers found exposure to nitrate increases the risk of getting Received 25 July 2014 cancer. Uncontrolled application of fertilizers on crops can cause excess nitrate to leach Received in revised form into groundwater. Objective: This study was conducted to determine nitrate levels in 8 August 2014 well water in paddy farming areas during three planting phases. The study also Accepted 15 September 2014 determined the health risk associated among population who worked and lived in the Available online 25 October 2014 study area. Results: The mean±standard deviation of nitrate levels in Kota Bharu and Bachok was 2.69±2.43 mg/l and 4.02 ± 3.85 mg/l respectively, which was below the Keywords: national standard (10 mg/l). In general, the highest nitrate concentration was found Nitrate,Groundwater, Health Risk during planting season with the mean ± SD of 4.63±4.84 mg/l as compared to pre- Kota Bharu, Bachok, Kelantan planting (2.84±2.26 mg/l) and harvesting phase (2.51±2.90 mg/l). The highest nitrate concentration was found in Bachok during the planting season with the mean ± SD of 6.58±5.89 mg/l. The hazard index for the study population was less than 1 and ranged between 0.00 and 0.29. Conclusion: In conclusion, the levels of nitrate in well water in Kota Bharu and Bachok is acceptable and the population has minimal health risk.

© 2014 AENSI Publisher All rights reserved. To Cite This Article: Amirah, A., R., Shaharuddin, M., S., and Sharifah Norkhadijah, S., I. Nitrate levels in well water and population health risk of Kota Bharu and Bachok, Kelantan in different planting phases. Adv. Environ. Biol., 8(15), 7-12, 2014

INTRODUCTION

Usage of nitrate in various industries has contributed to high levels of nitrate in environment. The extensive use of nitrate on crops has disturbed the nitrogen cycle and pollutes the groundwater. Characteristics of nitrate which is highly leachable and readily mobile cause excess nitrate to leach into groundwater easily [1, 2, 3]. Kelantan is one of a large state with agriculture activity. The majority of the populations in Kelantan are depended on agriculture activities and groundwater sources for daily lives [4, 5]. Thus, the drinking water has a high possibility to be contaminated with nitrate and this would affect population health. Examples of diseases caused by nitrate are gastric cancer, methemoglobinemia, non-hodgkin’s lymphoma, colorectal cancer and gastrointestinal tract disease [3]. The Malaysia National Drinking Water Quality Standard was recommended the safe value of nitrate in drinking water as 10 mg/l as well as the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations [6].

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Study Area: Kelantan is a state in east coast of peninsular Malaysia where the residents depend on groundwater for daily use. This study involved 10 villages in two districts in Kelantan, Malaysia namely Kota Bharu and Bachok which are Kampung Lubok Jambu, Kampung Guar, Tanjung Puri, Kampung Kor and Batu Lapan (Kota Bharu), and Kampung Tok Chong, Kampung Teluk Kemunting, Kampung Pauh Sembilan, Kampung Pintu Gerbang and Kampung Aur (Bachok) (Figure 1). The well selected were near to paddy fields.

Corresponding Author: Shaharuddin Mohd Sham, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Pon +6012-3387305, E-mail: [email protected]

8 Amirah, A.R., et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(15) Special 2014, Pages: 7-12

Fig. 1: Study area in Kota Bharu and Bachok districts, Kelantan.

Data Sampling: Well water samples were collected directly from the selected wells using HDPE bottles during different paddy planting phases. The bottles were first rinsed with the respective well water before use for sample collection. Reading of parameters such as nitrate level, pH, temperature and pressure was performed on site.

Health Risk Assessment: The population health risk was calculated using the formula in equation (1): CDI= C X DI (Equation 1) BW

Where, CDI stands for Chronic Daily Intake (mg/kg/day), C is nitrate concentration in well water (mg/l), DI is an average of respondent’s water daily intake (l/day) and BW is body weight (kg). The adverse health effect of nitrate to the respondents was calculated using the Hazard Index formula in equation 2. HI = CDI (Equation 2) RfD [7]

Where, HI is hazard index and RfD is reference dose (mg/kg/day). Reference dose uses the value of 1.6 mg kg day-1 as recommended by [6].

Results: Respondent’s Background: In this study, 80 respondents from Kota Bharu and Bachok districts were involved. They were 18-80 years old. All of them were Malay and most of them did not have an occupation (62.5%), 13.8% were doing own businesses, 11.3% were government employees and 6.3% were farmers. Their incomes mostly ranged between RM500 – RM999 per month (42.2%). The majority of the respondents have SPM for their educational level (30%), PMR (23.8%), no formal education (21.3%), attended primary school (18.8%), diploma holders (6.3%) and none of them were degree holders (Table 1).

9 Amirah, A.R., et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(15) Special 2014, Pages: 7-12

Well Background: The well selected in this study were located near to paddy fields (100 m or less). More than half of the wells were tube wells (56.3%) and the remained 43.8% were dug wells. The wells were mostly 15 years and above (60%). There were only 46.3% and 10% of the well being treated and maintain, respectively. Well water was used for all purposes except 3.8 % of the wells that were only used for drinking purposes (Table 2).

Nitrate Levels in Well water in Kota Bharu and Bachok: Generally, in Kota Bharu, there were no sites recorded nitrate levels exceeding the National standard. However, there were several sites in Bachok with nitrate levels higher than the National Standard, namely sample from BC9, BC15, BC17 and BC19. Thus, Kota Bharu district showed lower levels of nitrate compared to Bachok in all phases (Figure 2).

Comparison of Nitrate Levels during Different Planting Phase: Comparing the three seasons, it was found that the planting phase recorded the highest level of nitrate. During this phase, the nitrate level increased in many sites compared to the previous phase (pre-planting). - While, during the harvesting phase the level decreased in both district. Mean ± SD of NO3 during planting phase was 4.63±4.84 mg/l compared to pre-planting (2.84±2.26) and harvesting (2.51±2.90). The highest level of nitrate during pre-planting phase was in KB35 (11.60 ± 0.62mg/l), during planting phase’s BC19 (21.93± 3.53 mg/l) was the highest and BC6 (14.3±0.06 mg/l) was the highest during harvesting phase (Table 3).

Comparison of Nitrate Level with National Standard: Compared to the Malaysian National Drinking Water Quality Standard (NDWQS), there were several sites recorded nitrate value exceeds the standard. The worst was recorded by BC 19 with a value of 21.93±3.53 mg/l during planting phase, followed by BC 17 (20.9±1.92 mg/l), BC 15 (20.83± 0.31 mg/l) and BC 22 (14.13± 3.21mg/l). However, these results were indicates for the selected phase. Most of the other sites had nitrate value below the National Standard. The mean ± SD of nitrate for this study show that the reading was in acceptable range.

Health Risk Assessment: The study population’s health risk in this study was determined by calculated the chronic daily intake (CDI) and hazard index (HI). The mean ± SD for CDI in Kota Bharu was 0.08 ± 0.08 and 0.10 ± 0.09 in Bachok (Table 4). Hazard index was calculated by dividing the CDI value with Reference Dose (RfD) for nitrate (1.6 mg kg-1) [6]. HI value greater than 1 indicated that there is potential for an adverse health effect to occur [7]. In this study, the HI values of all respondents were less than 1. The mean ± SD were 0.01 ± 0.02 in Kota Bharu and 0.01 ± 0.13 in Bachok (Table 4).

35

30

25

20

15

Nitratelevel (mg/l) 10

5

0

Sampling locations

Fig. 2: Comparison of nitrate levels with national standard

10 Amirah, A.R., et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(15) Special 2014, Pages: 7-12

Table 1: Socio-demographic information Variables N Percentage Age: 18 – 24 11 13.8 25-59 41 51.3 60 and above 27 33.8 Unknown 1 1.3 Gender: Male 20 25.0 Female 60 75.0 Race: Malay 80 100 Education level: No education 17 21.3 Primary school 15 18.8 PMR/SRP 19 23.8 SPM 24 30.0 Diploma 5 6.3 Degree 0 0 Occupation: Not employed 50 62.5 Government employee 9 11.3 Self-employed (Business) 11 13.8 Farmer 5 6.3 Others 5 6.3 Income (RM): < 500 28 35.0 500-999 34 42.5 1001-1500 10 12.5 1501-3000 2 2.5 >3000 6 7.5

Table 2: Well background Variables N Percentage Type of well: Dug 35 43.8 Tube 45 56.3 Distance from agriculture area(m): <20 22 27.5 20-50 22 27.5 51-100 36 45.0 Age of well: <1 Year 3 3.8 1-5 Years 14 17.5 6-10 Years 8 10.0 11-15 Years 5 6.3 >15 Years 48 60.0 Well water being treated Yes (Chlorine) 37 46.3 No 43 53.8 Maintenance of well Never 72 90.0 once per year 8 10.0 Boil for drinking use Yes 78 97.5 No 2 2.5 Well water purpose: For drinking and cooking only 3 3.8 All Purposes (ie; drinking, cooking, bathing, washing, agriculture activity) 77 96.3

Table 3: Nitrate level in well water during different planting phases Phases No. of wells Mean ± SD (mg/l) Range P value Pre-planting 80 2.84±2.26 0.1-11.06 Planting 80 4.63±4.84 0.0-21.93 0.001 Harvesting 80 2.51±2.90 0.0-14.3 p < 0.05

11 Amirah, A.R., et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(15) Special 2014, Pages: 7-12

Table 4: Chronic Daily Intake estimation - NO3 (mg/l) *W (Kg) *CDI (mg kg-1) *HI value Mean 3.81 57.34 0.09 0.05 SD 4.15 13.65 0.09 0.05 Range 0.12-30.1 34-102 0.00-0.46 0.00-0.29 N=80; *W=weight *CDI= Chronic Daily Intake *HI=Hazard Index

Discussion: The mean ± SD of nitrate in this study (3.81±4.15) was considered as in acceptable value (Table 4). This finding was in line with research done by Abdul Manaff and Noriah, [9] in Kelantan which found the nitrate level was in range 0.20-2.59 mg/l. Generally, nitrate levels in Bachok showed higher value compared to Kota Bharu. This situation was similar to a study by Noor Wahida [10] that showed higher nitrate level in compared to other districts investigated. In this study, the higher nitrate level in site KB 35 was due to leakage of septic system as from the investigation done on site besides the agriculture activity. During the planting phase the nitrate levels increased compared to previous phases. This occur because of the fertilizers used on crops during this period of planting may have leached into groundwater. According to Abdul Rashid [11], the elevated levels of nitrate in groundwater are influenced by the agriculture activity. This finding was also in line with the finding by Abdul Manaff & Noriah [9], which found the quality of water in samples taken near paddy fields decreased during the planting period due to the plantation activities, application of fertilizers on crops and erosion that occurred during rainfall. A study by Mohamed Azwan [12] also concluded that the nitrate contamination was due to nitrogen fertilizers applied on rice crops. During the pre- planting phase, nitrate levels were low because the fertilizer was not yet applied. Besides, at this stage the paddy fields were being prepared for the planting period. The same went during the harvesting phase. This was due to the stopping of fertilizers use and crops were being harvested. Conclusion: The results showed that nitrate levels in the study sites in Kota Bharu and Bachok were within the acceptable limit and the health risk also were acceptable. The levels were also acceptable during all different planting phases and this study found that there was a significance difference between nitrate levels and different planting phases (p < 0.05) (Table 3). However, the residents’ awareness on well water contamination especially nitrates should be enhanced to avoid any diseases related to water pollution. The population awareness on drinking water was still low. The use of filter must be encouraged to minimize the risk on water borne disease.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia for the study grant (Research Universiti Grant Project No.: 04-03-11-1453RU) and for the continuing support for this research. Sincere gratitude to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UPM and all respondents involved in this study.

REFERENCES

Department of Environment, 2006. Malaysia Environmental Quality Report 2006. . Almasri, M.N. and J.J. Kaluarachchi, 2007. Modeling nitrate contamination of groundwater in agricultural watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 343(3-4): 211-229. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.016. Stadler, S., K. Osenbrück, K. Knöller, A. Suckow, J. Sültenfuß, H. Oster, H. Hötzl, 2008. Understanding the origin and fate of nitrate in groundwater of semi-arid environments. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(10): 1830–1842. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.003 Sanchezperez, J., I. Antiguedad, I. Arrate, C. Garcialinares and I. Morell, 2003. The influence of nitrate leaching through unsaturated soil on groundwater pollution in an agricultural area of the Basque country: a case study. The Science of The Total Environment, 317(1-3): 173-187. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00262-6. Samaneh, K., R. Zahraa, A. Mohamad Mehdi, P. Parinaz, M. Marjan and M. Amir, 2013. Association of Nitrate, Nitrite and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in drinking water and gastrointestinal disease.Journal of Environmental and Public Health. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). United States Environmental Protection Agency. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2007. Risk screening policy and second level risk screening. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2005. Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol Chapter 7: Characterizing Risk and Hazard. Abdul Manaff Mahmood and Noriah Abdullah, 2007. Impact of rice paddies plantation on surface water quality in Kelantan, Malaysia. In Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Zon /Kelantan (pp. 1–11). 12 Amirah, A.R., et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(15) Special 2014, Pages: 7-12

Noor Wahida Mahasim, Ahmad Saat, Zaini Hamzah, Rita Rohaizah Sahari and Khaniza Hasliza Abdil Khali, 2004. Nitrate and phosphate contents and quality of well water in north-eastern districts of Kelantan. Abdul Rashid Bachik, 1994. Variation and nitrate levels in Valley (Geological Survey Department Malaysia). Mohamed Azwan Mohamed Zawawi, Mohd Kamil Yusoff, Hazilia Hussain and Suhani Nasir, 2010. Nitrate-nitrogen concentration variation in groundwater flow in a paddy field. Journal-The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, 71(4).