2 1

work. Everywhere, detail is detailEverywhere, work. translation adds: afterwardsness (p. après regressive a in backwards Frenchthe Whilstpoints it’. buildingin mistake hisunderstood also engineer the and collapsed,bridge time ‘the movement: of arrow the that retroactivity; to reference a retain to needs (p. Freud” in work atnever is theory a “such butconsequence, of theory becomesaction”,a Nachträglichkeit“deferred As 26). strictly determined by thefirst: ‘the terrorist planted is event second the whereby 2, Event to 1 Event from movement,progressive a envisagedFreud that sense consequence important one has Jones) of behest the (at equivalent English the as action” “deferred of choice Strachey’s translation. Nothing shows Laplanche’s attentivenessto translation betterthan his study Nachträglichkeit.of suchfaire a travailler. (p. intended Laplanche as word”, the of sense t Freudian “putting than rather work” Freud “making as translates Laplanche describes his project as a “‘faire travailler’ la pensée freudienne” Laplanche’s certainly the more hone by their accountsown the re same: a reader might consider Lacan's treatment somewha The magisterial 1967’s in term the to devoted Language Psychoanalysisof article long the to compared when though “Rome this, his for credit in who, Lacan actually was it Indeed, Discourse” of 1953, first reappraised student.the term Nachträglichkeit his Laplanche analyst, Laplanche’s was Lacan worke men Both (Laplanche, pre five his distilled Laplanche which into Psychoanalysis, for Foundations New 1987’s major his of publication the after years two delivered was It 1970. in began that course running workFreud’s in Middlesex LacanOnline.com University, All accompanied pagenumbersnot and regarding bydate author information publication the to refer thatbeing book is reviewe ISSN ISSN Indeed, a concern for specific terminological problems in translating Freud runs throughout Laplanche’s throughout runs Freud translating in problemsterminological specific for concern a Indeed, tocentral are thatthemes showcasestwoLaplanche concept this withdealing In Lacan.Jacques of series Seminar the to comparisonsinvite but help cannot series the whole, a as Taken of series lecture comprisingLaplanche’scollection, This HewitsonOwen Published 2017, New York: UnconsciousThe inTranslation - coup seems to ref to seems coup 2472

1987).

for Laplanche for –

d at the same time, in the same city, and in the same format of year of format same the in and city, same the in time, same the at d

Nachträglichkeit.Après

26). Any translation of Nachträglichkeit that is loyal to the sense in wh in sense the to loyal is that Nachträglichkeit of translation Any 26).

1

Jean Laplanche’sJean Après lect both these movements, it lacks the substantive Laplanche’s proposed English proposed Laplanche’s substantive the lacks it movements, these both lect

vital. We see this in the most mammoth of tasks he undertakes, like his life his like undertakes, he tasks of mammoth most the in this see We vital. – –

a work for which Laplanche is most famous in the Englishforthefamousismost whichina work Laplanche it points the arrow of time in only one direction, forwards. This gives us the us gives This forwards. direction, one only in time of arrow the points it

st, both to the totality of Freud’s thought and to the problems it confronts.

26). - Psychoanalytic Psychoanalytic Discourse reading Freud. of perhaps Lacan’s is the ‘creative’more re

- coup is the sixth in the series of Problématiques,longLaplanche’sseries of the in sixth the is coup

4) 2

t t scant (Laplanche & Pontalis, o the concept of Nachträglichkeit Laplanche devotes just devotes Laplanche Nachträglichkeit of concept the o

thebomb, and ten minutes later the bomb went off’ (p. - Coup 1989

- (Lacan,

Problématiques VI - 1990, traces the evolution of a single termsingle a of evolutionthe traces 1990, hought to work”, so as to capture “every capture to as so work”, to hought

2006, p. -

an expression that House wisely

213). Laplanche gives him fair

2004). 2004). Both men’s project is his entire work. Firstly,work.entire his vious Problématiques vious - Issue Issue 4 - speaking worldspeaking long public lectures. public long

ich Freud used it used Freud ich

-

- October reading, but late work, late – - long , 2017

the d. -

98

Psychoanalytic Discourse

the Project1895of(Freud well bit a now by is example classical this Laplanch If Emma. of case the of think they Nachträglichkeit Laplanche’s ongoing t ‘Temporality and Translation’ translate the message of to “fundamental a as designate I what than other nothing is forward” carried than translation, the indivisible double movement of “beinghas carried forward” he and “referring back”.session The “being last very the by double the capturesthat process Man,mental no is explanation:“There promised his Wolfdelivered the of treatment new entirely an and Emma, of histories case (p. 1890s: that the arrow fantasizing”of time points in two di “retroactive the from theory or own his about forgotten history,had Freud claims he nuance own the of us one’sremind to wants Laplanche of “resignification” as such notions to slippage (p. time” of theory translational a explain, will I as is, “It session. first very the in says he time”, about thought a itself is seduction of theory “The well. as coup separate the event from the memory of the event, fact from fantasy? These are La moments, does one determine the other? If so, why is this event more important than any other? How do we of strands the untangle to trying anyone preoccupy would that those are Freud preoccupied that questions the that clear makes Laplanche “après action”, 1992). later also is which has the effect of seduction (p.154). To translate is therefore characterized (p. being” ar human the Humans of constitution original). the of model translational a even and seduction après of model translational “a presents to were we If neurosis. of determinant the as adult the from Freud’s abandoned ‘special’ theory seductionof which had hypothecated a situation of sexual abuseby si fundamental this describe to Seduction New In Après of Freud.delivery the to priorforimmediately written Foundations, did it than work his in gamut wider much a on takes term the but ‘seduction’, situation and the early Anlehnunginfant is faced with enigmatic, inadvertently (Scarfone being as human the of Situation Anthropological Fundamental the called such has Scarfone terms on commentary lengthy his (witness Freud Wahrnehmungszeichen, both of which are revisited in 1967 this volume). of exhaustive pockets his or smallest French, into Works also We Lacan). Complete by “scholastic” as off (dismissivelybrushedpsychoanalysis Freud’s translating of project memory traces, and it is there that Laplanche spots the model of translation he translation of model the spots Laplanche that there is it and traces, memory (Freud Laplanche for interest betweensplittwomoments (p. To examine how Laplanche’s argument progresses, it is interesting to note that when people think of think people when that note to interesting is it progresses, argument Laplanche’s how examine To Après The second central theme of Laplanche’s work is time. With whatever term we choose to use Butfor Laplanche translation is also a concept initself. Awork

e it is just one of several texts from the pre - op s copne a te oues n b to hre papers shorter two by end volume’s the at accompanied is coup generalized

by “a demand to translate the message of the other”, and it is the enigma in these messages these in enigma the is it and other”, the of message the translate to demand “a by - coup”, “retroactivity”, “belatedness”, or “afterwardsness” or “belatedness”,“retroactivity”, coup”, translation e heoretical interestin these two areas.

by Laplanche, its place located between hermeneutics and determinism (Laplanchedeterminismandhermeneutics betweenlocated place its Laplanche, by

theother.” (p. ,

1895 , –

1896

Jean Laplanche’s Après which bookend the lecture series historically but in their titles alone testify to 40). But it40).But /1950 - hi proa nraie I w hv to vns n oen’ lf, two life, someone’s in events two have we If narrative. personal their aig ahns fr alnh. hi fnaetl iuto i one is situation fundamental Their Laplanche. for machines, making /1950 ), israised),situateif onlyseduction the to theory aas trauma model of

154). - tuation, a label that label a tuation, coup and, more generally, a translational model of the theory of theory the of model translational a generally, more and, coup ). It is there that Freud presents a theory of the stratification of stratification the of theory a presents Freud that there is It ). is the letter to Fleissletterdated isthe holds Decembergreaterto 18966th, that

rections. After a thorough demonstration of this effect from the

- 8, emphasis in the original). Frustrated by the perpetual the by Frustrated original). the in emphasis 8, 1900 Freud that are worth reconsidering. The case, from

sexualized - Coup summarize

-

ProblématiquesVI –

messages from the other. Laplanche calls th -

with echoes of Einstein of echoes with coup, he had proposed a General Theory of Theory General a proposed had he coup, to interpret, and interpretation as a concept

of of translation constitutes what Dominique

this volume, it volume, this

– see it in the work he does on the on does he work the in it see

the question is still one of time. of one still is question the - – be translated”: a demand to demand a translated”: be

planche’s concerns in Après

Tm ad h Ohr, and Other’, the and ‘Time will later go on to develop to on go later will

might be by saying that it that saying by be might –

movement bettermovement would separate it separate would 5, mhss in emphasis 154, encyclopedia ,

2013) when 2013) – -

“d on for worn, eferred

147),

of is - ,

99

Psychoanalytic Discourse

(p. (p. unsatisfied” remains he scene, original figured He out. have will piece”,the last Laplanche says. long “As Freud as does nothave all pieces the allit have will “He reality. of side the on down come always will Freud reality, andfantasybetween choice a whole puzzle but also ensure that, when we do, the entire resulting pictu (p. brush broada with pointing time between Nachträglichkeit of and Zurückpha arrow the keep to differencethe desireexplains Laplanche analogy, nice a With inversion.Jungian the allowing (p a than rather forwards, demonstrates Zuruckphantasieren scene determinative gigantic the one fact in as establishing case the of account Freud’s have a place. But rather than being content with a “brick everyf for place a find meticulousto devotionhis of born reasons Freud the show to case Man Wolf the to points he and equivalent, not certainly are terms two the Laplanche, For Freud used this term himself initially, he dismisses it as nothing new when Jung started to grant it prominence. as something like ‘retroactive fantasising’, a ‘regressive resignification’ in the present o term advanced by Jung which appeared to account for the same problem: Zurückphantasieren. This translates repression, and the primal father. Ur call might we what of prominence a après Nachträglichkeit translation of or understandingemergence demands then and years for sleeps that message a Like Freud’s that notes Laplanche theory, seduction the account of the case contains less no than fifteen references to Nachträ of abandonment the with out dying from Far 1918). 105). But a major part of the already not is child (the past the reinterprets present the p the how of example an as read be can It backwards. and forward both points time of arrow the that is tale remarked, “that I didn’t make a better use of my opportunity”” (Freud went story once talking was beautyfeminine of admirergreat a was who man young “A term. this on work his Nachträ of concept the illustrate to offers Freud anecdote short a only There, Dreams. of Interpretation the to turns Laplanche (p. 1899 Me Screen the of discussion brief a After ‘seduction’. a constitute might what and itself same basis (Masson to was Masson later century a almost When 73). seduction of the child by the adult, for instance intellectualFreud’s Laplanche what (p. himself ast determines the present (the child is already

134). Freud’s almost stubborn insistence to locate the point of the primal scene in the Wolf Man’s history is history Man’s Wolf the in scene primal the of point the locate to insistence stubborn almost Freud’s Man’s Wolf the writing was he time the At case this is why So

106) (a106) broader discussion which isof taken upLaplanche by scholar John(Fletcher Fletcher)

46). When we come to Freud’s announcement of the abandonment of the seduction theory, in theory, seduction the of abandonment the of announcement Freud’s to come we When 46). –

f h good the of never condensed atheory of Nachträglichkeitinto Zurückphantasieren (p. baptizes glichkeit is considered, but it is an example Laplanche returns to frequently elsewhere inelsewhere frequently to returnsLaplanche example an is it but considered, is glichkeit fidelity in his determination to establish the fact of the event. If the first eventfirst the If event.the offact establishdetermination the histo fidelity in ,

2003). Masson is only interested in the fact of seduction; Laplanche reconsiders the term

127). With a jigsaw puzzle, we not only have to find a place for each little piece in theinpiece little each for place a findto have only not puzzle,we jigsaw a With127). –

rather than the more celebrated case of Emma of celebratedcase more the ratherthan

h ‘qio lte’ (Freud letter’ ‘Equinox the - okn wet looking latter half of Après ti pit ak te pi bten ru ad ug ad h cmn to coming the and Jung, and Freud between split the marks point this t

-

- concepts in Freud’s thought: primal fantasies, primal scenes, primal scenes, primal fantasies, primal thought: Freud’s in concepts us wo a scld h suckled had who nurse ntasieren as like completing a jigsaw puzzle versus painting an image

127). This is why Freud never bought into Jung’s term completelyterm Jung’s into bought never Freud why is This 127). - O. Hewitson – coup is reserved for a discussion of the Wolf Man case (Freud case, Freud’s Nachträglichkeit was competing with another with competing was Nachträglichkeit Freud’s case, sexualized

does not exist, Freud thought his whole theory collapses (p. criticize ,

1897 - by act. Every element of the dream’s recitation has tohas recitation dream’s theEvery elementof act.

sexualized Freud for this abandonment he does so from the from so does he abandonment this for Freud , and the adult looks back wistfully at this), or how -

brick” reconstruction that would allow us to read /1950 m hn e a a ay “’ sry” he sorry,” “I’m baby: a was he when im , alnh nts lfln hlmr of hallmark lifelong a notes Laplanche ), , but the adult the but , ,

glichkeit(p. 1900, re is still comprehensible. Faced with p – .

of such importance to Laplanche?importanceto such of 116 pp. - 1) Feds insiste Freud’s 117), 204

111). sexualizes - 205). The nuance in this nto the past. Although

137 mories paper from paper mories ;

pp. the scene). (p. scene). the - op h re the coup,

144 –

– a sexuala , c on nce -

145). 2013), so the so of of the

- , 100

Psychoanalytic Discourse

They They constitute the traumata of seduction, kick awa are child the nor adult the neither ‘to the misstep.thirdLaplanche’s Seduction GeneralTheoryof resumes fromthispoint adding however,atheory of presentfromapasteventinecho(p. the an model of repression on the basis of the recognition that trauma always needs two separate moments in time, (Freud 1896 December, 6th of letter the In thinks. Laplanche “takes that message a constitute account the (sexual) unconscious of the sender theof not message” (p. does simply this him, For parents. the of ‘primal sexuality Man’s the Wolf is the scene’ for search the in misses Freud sexuwhat manner, same own the In her child. the has breastfeeding nurse wet the other: specific very a but OtherbigLacanian the desireof the abouttalking here not is Laplanche back. andforward both points is child the which at point the than (rather herself nurse wet the of desire the is it that possibility the overlooks simply (p. scene.” “mat of discussion the of importance the diminishes considerably “It argues, Laplanche would have helped Freud because “If we introduce the notion of the message of the other into the Wolf Man”, event leadshim toassumption the of phylogenesis in opposition to Jung’s Zuruckphantasieren. of the 1890s, so evident in the Screen Memories paper. Instead, his ceaseless quest for the original‘original’ his of complexity the forgetsor effectivelyHe time. ‘primal’of arrow the of prisoner a is Freud First, 76). reconstructto d that, in a sense, Freud re (Freud imagination” the in remodelled become h the with in fit to fail experiences “Wherever that claim extraordinary the in results by hypothecating that this stock is actually universal, inherited, and has a prehistoric provenance (p. “the regular store in the moves. First by appealing to what, he thinks, must be a common experience in the life of all neurotics, part of Totem and Taboo: “In the beginningdeed”. the was (Freud al for support(p. fantasies” the as real serve a find can to which necessary point, absolutely is starting “It contends. Laplanche seduction”, of theory the of abandonment pha concept that Freud reaches for to differentiate his theory from Jung’s: phylogenesis, under the guise of primal animalsdoingestatethehesawway,thatthe onitassumesFreud (p his seeactuallyever he supposes.DidFreud tergo, a coituswitnessed have mustHe castrated? be could women that belief a develop to opportunity no had Man Wolf the if castration reaches Freud where instances is the eventual heir. ntasies (p. ntasies There is one crucial turning point in Freud’s early work where he has the chance to correct this oversight, of importance the misses Freud Second, Laplanche identifies three missteps in the progression of Freud’s work on Nachträglichkeit (p. himse relieves Freud to points Laplanche gaps? are there where or place, a have not do facts the when happens what But

- be -

translated’ that Freud lacked. Seduction operates via the transmission of insinuations, of which of insinuations, of transmission the via operates Seduction lacked. Freud that translated’ 155). To return to the anecdote that Freud was so fond of quoting to explain Nachträglichkeit,toquoting explainof he fond so Freudthatwas the anecdote returnto To 155). sexualized

74). Showing this steadfast fidelity to fact to fidelity steadfast this Showing 74). 138). “We can see how powerfully Freud’s phylogenetic hypotheses are determined by the by determined are hypotheses phylogenetic Freud’s powerfully how see can “We 138). oes notreally matter(p

) that could offer a way to way a offer could that ) - - lf of the need to find a scene of parental coitus in the case of the Wolf Man in two in Man Wolf the of case the in coitus parental of scene a find to need the of lf

learns the lesson of his work from the 1890s conscious or unconscious Jean Laplanche’s Après

outside the jigsaw puzzle (p puzzle jigsaw the outside p re, but which are intuited by the child despite remaining enigmatic. remaining despite child the by intuited are which but re, .

143

122). But he does notdoesadvanceconcept. This constitutesthis122). Buthe th - the transmission of an ‘enigmatic message’ from the other. It other. the from message’ ‘enigmatic an of transmission the 144). - starting the child’s own questioning process, of which the ego ,

synthesize 1918, p. 1918, -

trea

- Coup ltr eeomns fr h “rvs.. o primal for “drives”... the for developments, later l l eie n mnls hs ih e eprec of experience her with this mingles and desire al sury of their memories” (Freud

- 119). Whatever we may think of this claim we see we claim this of think may we Whatever 119). over ,

the quandary presented when the arrow of time of arrow the presentedwhen quandary the 1913, p. p - ,

. ProblématiquesVI -

1896 fantasy, Laplanche quotes the last words of words last the quotes Laplanche fantasy, 133

- 152). /

134). How can we explain the threat of threat the explain we can How 134). 161). 1950 p – .

that the scene he so laboriously tried 138

) Freud introduces a ‘translational’ a introduces Freud ) - parents in the act? Maybe it wasit Maybeact? the in parents 139). But then comescrucial139).theButthen

ereditary schema, they schema, ereditary ,

1918, p. erial reality” of the of reality” erial

59). Second, 153; p

139). This thesis p

. into

75 e - 101

Psychoanalytic Discourse

D Scarfone, J. Masson, Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J. Laplanche, J. (1987) J. Laplanche, Laplanche, J. (2017) Lacan, J. (2006) (1950) S. Freud, (1950) S. Freud, (1950) S. Freud, (1918) S. Freud, [1912 (1913 S. Freud, (1900) S. Freud, (1899) S. Freud, Fletcher, J. (2013) of cornerstone important this References of evolution the progress and prolong to psychoanalytic thought. way admirable an offered Freud” is a F (p. Nachträglichkeit of originality theby troubled”been hastheoreticians cliniciansor fewvery of sleep “the that effectthe to 2005, in added (p. thought” re on http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745 Psychoanalysis Books. Psychoanalysis of from Journal International The 1895). Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, work published 1897). Freu Sigmund of Works Psychological Complete work published 1896). W Psychological Complete (Original work published 1914). C the of Complete Psychological Works ofSigmund Freud, Complete Psychological Works ofSigmund Freud, Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Après of lecturefirst very the in Sadly, - reading Freud has had not “the slightest influence on the internationalpsychoanalyticthe developmentinfluence slightest on of “the not had hasreadingFreud

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1399277

(2003) (2013). . rench return”, he suggests (p.

mlt Pyhlgcl ok o Sgud Freud, Sigmund of Works Psychological omplete 12), or on the way Freud has been understood. In the very last lecture there i therelecture last very the Inunderstood. beenhas Freud waythe on or 12), (1992) . . .

. . .

Ecrits

.

From the History of an Infantile Neurosis.Infantilean of Historythe From Project for a Scientific Psychology. Scientific a for Project

Letter 69 (September 21, 1897). 21, (September 69 Letter . Letter 52 (December 6, 1896). 6, (December 52 Letter h Itrrtto o Dreams. of Interpretation The . cen Memories. Screen

, Freud

h Asut n rt: ru' Sprsin f h Sdcin Theory Seduction the of Suppression Freud's Truth: on Assault The . . .

Nouveauxfondements pour lapsychanalyse Après

Interpretation

- bif nrdcin o h wr o Ja Laplanche Jean of work the to introduction brief A (B. Fink,Trans.). 1913])

94 and theScene ofTrauma

-

coup (3)

- B. (2004) .

, orks of Sigmund Freud, Sigmund of orks Totem and Taboo. and Totem

(J. House L. &

147). In this respect, “It is not completely false to say that the “return to “return the that say to false completely not is “It respect, this In 147).

between determinism and hermeneutics: a restatement of the problemthe restatementof a hermeneutics:and determinism between

545 . n . tahy E. Trans.), & (Ed. Strachey J. In

The Language of Psychoanalysis NewYork and London: Norton and Company. - 566.

12). With this new English translation however Jonathan House has - coup (Vol.

T O. Hewitson hurston, Trans.).

3, pp 3, Laplanche notes that the work both he and Lacan had donehad Lacan and heboth work the that notesLaplanche

n . tahy E.& Trans.), & (Ed. Strachey J. In . n . tahy E. Trans.), & (Ed. Strachey J. In

In J. Strachey (Ed. Strachey J. In

Retrieved In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), & (Ed. Strachey J. In New York: Fordham University Press d,

, In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), & (Ed. Strachey J. In

(Vol. - (Vol. (Vol. . (Vol. 8315.12063/full (Vol. 73

301 ( 3 1

- . ),

13, pp 13, 4 ). In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), & (Ed.Strachey J. In 1 1 323)

)

, pp , , pp , . Vintage, Vintage, 429 (Vol. . Vintage, . . . Paris: PressUniversitaires de France. NewYork: The Unconscious inTranslation.

.

- 233

259 etme 1t, 07 from 2017 14th, September ix 4

45. 45. - 7 pp 17, 165) h Sadr Eiin f h Complete the of Edition Standard The

- - Hogarth Press. & Trans.), & . 240 261)

Hogarth Press . London: Karnac.

eree Spebr 4h 2017 14th, September Retrieved . Vintage,

Hogarth Press ) . . .

Vintage, Vintage, 3 . - 125) h Itrainl ora of Journal International The h Sadr Eiin f the of Edition Standard The The Standard Edition of the of Edition Standard The The Standard Edition of the of Edition Standard The The Standard Edition of the of Edition Standard The The Standard Edition of the of Edition Standard The

Vintage, . Hogarth Press

(Original work published . Hogarth Press Hogarth Press. Hogarth

. The Standard EditionTheStandard .

Lno: Ballantine London: .

s also a comment,a also s

oat Press Hogarth .

.

(Original (Original

. . 102

Psychoanalytic Discourse