On the Subject of Autism: Lacan, First-Person Writing, and Research Adam Neil Poulin University of Vermont
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2019 On the Subject of Autism: Lacan, First-Person Writing, and Research Adam Neil Poulin University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Other Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Poulin, Adam Neil, "On the Subject of Autism: Lacan, First-Person Writing, and Research" (2019). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 997. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/997 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ON THE SUBJECT OF AUTISM: LACAN, FIRST-PERSON WRITING, AND RESEARCH A Thesis Presented by Adam Poulin to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education Specializing in Interdisciplinary Studies January, 2019 Defense Date: November 5, 2018 Thesis Examination Committee: Todd McGowan, Ph.D., Advisor Judith Aiken, Ph.D., Chairperson Hyon-Joo Yoo, Ph.D. Lance Smith, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT In his essay, Don’t Mourn for Us, Jim Sinclair describes autism as a “way of being.” He maintains there is “no normal child hidden behind the autism” and that “it colors every experience, every sensation, perception, thought, emotion, and encounter, every aspect of existence.” In an attempt to appreciate the depth of Sinclair’s statements, this thesis approaches autism as a “way of being” through the psychoanalytic theory of Jacques Lacan. By applying Lacan’s conceptual framework to first-person writing and scientific research, I lay an interdisciplinary foundation for the case I make. Although this project requires significant conceptual scaffolding across different epistemological systems, I consider how Lacanian theory possesses a unique capacity to conceive of autism as a way of being and to open new ways of approaching the source material. Implicitly, Sinclair asks that we consider the question of what it means “to be” – autistic, neurotypical, or otherwise. I approach this from the premise that an individual exists as a thinking being, or a “subject.” Because psychoanalysis is concerned with the constitutive role of the unconscious in structuring consciousness, this thesis invests substantial space in consideration of how the Lacanian subject is oriented around a fundamental lack. To this end, I return frequently to Lacan’s concept of objet a, understood as a representative of the subject’s lack in the perceptual realm that is itself lacking. Further, Lacan’s unique interpretation of Freud consists in placing language as the ultimate mediating structure of subjectivity; it both generates lack and establishes a system for mitigating it. One’s way of being is always a way of being in language.1 Given the predominant roles of language and social communication impairments in the DSM-V diagnostic criteria for autism, a main goal of this project is to consider how an autistic way of being entails a unique structuration of lack.2 Autism and psychoanalysis share a history that extends back to the origins of the diagnosis. I explore this history with a focus on how different psychoanalytic theories conceptualize the autistic subject and to what extent they honor or undermine Sinclair’s position. Contemporary Lacanian thinkers of autism do both. Unique to Lacan’s structural approach, the concept of the Other is inclusive of a radical alterity, yet also the system of language, the body, and certain aspects of the maternal and paternal functions. The subject is unthinkable apart from the Other. I suggest an autistic way of being is discernible in the autistic subject’s relation to each aspect of the Other. I find support for this claim in recent sensorimotor research. Referred to loosely as the movement perspective, this research suggests that differences in how autistic individuals move and perceive others is a “unifying characteristic” of autism.3 Importantly, the movement perspective is proactively inclusive of first-person knowledge. Read through Lacan’s conceptual framework, movement differences address the underlying mechanism of the autistic subject’s relation to the Other, and thus its way of being. Most fundamentally, this thesis is a work of theory that attempts to articulate something universal about being a subject, without simultaneously eliding what is unique about being an autistic subject ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not exist without the generous support of more individuals than I will name here. With that in mind, I would like to express my gratitude to Robert Nash and the Interdisciplinary Studies Program for maintaining an academic space that promotes student-directed learning; to Todd McGowan for his perhaps unwitting role in sustaining my desire to write; to my defense committee members for being open to this rather unruly project; to my friends, Monroe Street and Frank Smecker, who lent their valuable time and thoughtful commentary to early drafts; to Liliane Savard for her enthusiastic support and thought-provoking questions; to Stan Baker for keeping me grounded; and to Richard Boothby for helping me get unstuck more than once. I am most profoundly indebted to my family for their unwavering patience and providing me with the loving impetus to finish. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ii Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Meet and Greet ...............................................................................................................5 Psychoanalysis and Being ..............................................................................................8 Lacan’s Subject ............................................................................................................12 Why a Metapsychology ...............................................................................................21 Metapsychology from Freud to Lacan with Richard Boothby ..............................35 Being: The Final Approach ..........................................................................................46 Interlude – Psychoanalysis and Autism...................................................................... .......55 Chapter 2: Introduction .....................................................................................................84 Review .........................................................................................................................88 Das Ding and Autism Research ...................................................................................92 Eye Tracking and the Limit of the Imaginary .............................................................94 Movement Differences and the Thing about Autism .................................................100 The Object of the Autistic Other ...............................................................................105 The Shape of the Other and the Shape of the Object ................................................109 Review, Reset, and Discussion ..................................................................................125 The Object of Autistic Sense-Making .......................................................................129 Tito’s Autistic Objects and the Space of the Question ..............................................133 Conclusion: So what? And What Now? ..........................................................................149 Further Study .............................................................................................................154 Works Cited .....................................................................................................................160 Endnotes ........................................................................................................................165 iii Chapter 1: Introduction Autism is typically defined as a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting multiple aspects of an individual’s life. Current DSM-V diagnostic criteria include impairments in verbal and non-verbal communication, deficits in social interactions, and restricted and repetitive behaviors or interests.4 Frequently associated with these criteria are a pronounced preference for sameness and an aversion to breaks in routine, as well as hyper- or hypo-sensitivity to certain sensory stimuli.5 Autism is conceived of as existing along a spectrum, conjoining individuals in need of intensive daily supports at one end, with those who go largely unnoticed among their non-autistic peers at the other end. Although rates of occurrence have risen steadily over the last three decades, accompanied by an increase in research,6 societal awareness, and cultural representation, there is still no definitive etiology of autism beyond a collection of risk factors.7 In my view, each inconclusive attempt to determine a cause corresponds to a speculative theory about what autism is. These range from the psychogenic and the environmental, to the neurobiological and the genetic. Regardless of the varying degrees of