Appendix B:Characteristics of National Samples
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Appendix B Characteristics of National Samples Introduction For each country participating in PIRLS 2006, this appendix describes the target population defi nition (where necessary), the extent of coverage and exclusions, the use of stratifi cation variables, and any deviations from the general PIRLS sample design. B.1 Austria Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<3), and special education schools • Within-school exclusions consisted of intellectually and functionally disabled students, and non-native language speakers Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by region for a total of 9 explicit strata • Implicit stratifi cation by district (the number of districts varies by region) for a total of 121 implicit strata • Sampled two classrooms per school whenever possible • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities TIMSS & PIRLS INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER, LYNCH SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, BOSTON COLLEGE 231 232 appendix b: characteristics of national samples Exhibit B.1 Allocation of School Sample in Austria Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools Burgenland 5 0 5 000 Kärnten11110000 Niederösterreich 31031000 Oberösterreich 30030000 Salzburg 11 0 11 0 0 0 Steiermark 23 023 000 Tirol 15 114 000 Vorarlberg 8 0 8 000 Wien 26 026 000 Total 1602158 000 B.2 Belgium (Flemish) Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<5), and special schools Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by school type (Flemish community, public, private) for a total of 3 explicit strata • Implicit stratifi cation by province (Antwerpen, Limburg, Oost-Vlaanderen, Vlaams-Brabant, West-Vlaanderen) for a total of 15 implicit strata • Sampled two classrooms per school whenever possible • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities Exhibit B.2 Allocation of School Sample in Belgium (Flemish) Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools Flemish Community 20 0 15401 schools Public schools 34 121 534 Private schools 96 0 66 1677 Total 150110225 10 12 appendix b: characteristics of national samples 233 B.3 Belgium (French) Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<5), schools for disabled children, and hospital schools • Within-school exclusions consisted of children with less than one year of instruction in French Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by school type (state, communal, religious) for a total of 3 explicit strata • Implicit stratifi cation by region (Brabant Wallon, Bruxelles-Capitale, Hainault, Liège, Namur, Luxembourg) for a total of 18 implicit strata • Sampled two classrooms per school whenever possible • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities Exhibit B.3 Allocation of School Sample in Belgium (French) Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools State 14 0113 00 Communal 72062 9 10 Religious 64 0 56 8 00 Total 1500129 20 1 0 B.4 Bulgaria Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<6), and special education schools Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by region for a total of 9 explicit strata • Implicit stratifi cation by urbanization (urban, rural) for a total of 18 implicit strata 234 appendix b: characteristics of national samples • Sampled two classrooms per school having at least 60 students (MOS≥60) and one classroom otherwise • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities Exhibit B.4 Allocation of School Sample in Bulgaria Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools Burgas 18 0153 00 Hashkovo 16 112201 Lovech 16 014 101 Montana 10 0 9 100 Plovdiv 22 1 20 1 0 0 Ruse 14 112100 Sofia City 19 017 200 Sofia Region 17 015 101 Varna 18 016 101 Total 150 3 13013 0 4 B.5 Canada, Alberta Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<6), and online/ correspondence students Sample Design • No explicit stratifi cation • Implicit stratifi cation by school type (charter, Francophone, private, public, separate) for a total of 5 implicit strata • Sampled two classrooms per school having at least 60 students (MOS≥60) and one classroom otherwise • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities (MOS<16) appendix b: characteristics of national samples 235 Exhibit B.5 Allocation of School Sample in Canada, Alberta Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools Canada (Alberta) 1500150000 Total 1500150000 B.6 Canada, British Columbia Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<6), alternate and distance education schools, district distance education schools, and long term Provincial Resource Program (PRP) schools Sample Design • No explicit stratifi cation • Implicit stratifi cation by school type (public, independent) for a total of 2 implicit strata • Sampled two classrooms per school having at least 52 students (MOS≥52) and one classroom otherwise • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities (MOS<14) Exhibit B.6 Allocation of School Sample in Canada, British Columbia Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools Canada (British Columbia) 1500147 102 Total 1500147 102 B.7 Canada, Nova Scotia Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<5) 236 appendix b: characteristics of national samples Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by regional council for a total of 8 explicit strata • No implicit stratifi cation • Sampled two classrooms per school having at least 77 students (MOS≥77) and one classroom otherwise • Very large and small schools sampled with equal probabilities • Census of schools in the four smallest regional councils (Strait Regional, Acadian Provincial, South Shore Regional, and Tri-County Regional) Exhibit B.7 Allocation of School Sample in Canada, Nova Scotia Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools Cape Breton-Victoria 25 025 000 Regional Strait Regional 16 016 000 Chignecto Central 26 025 100 Regional Halifax Regional 58 0 58 000 Annapolis Valey Regional 25 025 000 Acadien Provincial 16 016 000 South Shore Regional 17 017 000 Tri-County Regional 18 018 000 Total 201 0 200 1 0 0 B.8 Canada, Ontario Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<10), special needs schools, native schools, and overseas schools • Within-school exclusions consisted of children with disabilities (either within regular classrooms or in special education classrooms within regular schools) Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by language (English, French) for a total of 2 explicit strata • Implicit stratifi cation by school type (public, Catholic, private) for a total of 6 implicit strata appendix b: characteristics of national samples 237 • Sampled two classrooms per school having at least 100 students (MOS≥100) and one classroom otherwise • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities (MOS<15) • Two schools in the French stratum were sampled with certainty Exhibit B.8 Allocation of School Sample in Canada, Ontario Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools English 120 1 105 2012 French 80168 5 0 6 Total 200 2 173 7 018 B.9 Canada, Quebec Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<10), Native schools, non-ministry schools, and special education schools • Within-school exclusions consisted of children with disabilities or non-native speakers Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by language (English, French) for a total of 2 explicit strata • Implicit stratifi cation by school type (public, private) for a total of 4 implicit strata • Sampled one classroom per school • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities • Four schools in the English stratum were sampled with certainty Exhibit B.9 Allocation of School Sample in Canada, Quebec Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum Sampled 1st 2nd Participating Schools Sampled Schools Replacement Replacement Schools English 80274 004 French 120 4 111 0 0 5 Total 200 6 185 009 238 appendix b: characteristics of national samples B.10 Chinese Taipei Coverage and Exclusions • Coverage is 100% • School-level exclusions consisted of very small schools (MOS<15), schools on remote islands, and special needs schools • Within-school exclusions consisted of disabled students Sample Design • Explicit stratifi cation by region (North, Middle, South, East) for a total of 4 explicit strata • No implicit stratifi cation • Sampled one classroom per school • Small schools sampled with equal probabilities Exhibit B.10 Allocation of School Sample in Chinese Taipei Total Participating Schools Non- Ineligible Explicit Stratum