Remarks Following Discussions with Prime Minister Tony Blair of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Remarks Following Discussions with Prime Minister Tony Blair of The 1608 Nov. 7 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2001 institutions on notice: If you do business with porters with Internet service, secure tele- terrorists, if you support them or sponsor phone communications, and other ways of them, you will not do business with the sending messages and sharing information. United States of America. They even arrange for the shipment of weap- Today we are taking another step in our ons. fight against evil. We are shutting down two They present themselves as legitimate major elements of the terrorists international businesses. But they skim money from every financial network, both at home and abroad. transaction for the benefit of terrorist organi- Ours is not a war just of soldiers and aircraft. zations. They enable the proceeds of crime It’s a war fought with diplomacy, by the in- in one country to be transferred to pay for vestigations of law enforcement, by gathering terrorist acts in another. intelligence, and by cutting off the terrorists’ The entry point to these networks may be money. a small storefront operation, but follow the I want to thank Secretary Paul O’Neill for network to its center and you discover being here today and for being the leader wealthy banks and sophisticated technology, of this fine organization. I want to thank the all at the service of mass murderers. By shut- Director, Jim Sloan, as well. You’re doing ting these networks down, we disrupt the some imaginative work here at the Financial murderers’ work. Today’s action interrupts Al Crimes Enforcement Network, and I want Qaida’s communications; it blocks an impor- to thank all the fine Americans who are on tant source of funds. It provides us with valu- the frontline of our war, the people who work able information and sends a clear message here. to global financial institutions: You are with I want to thank Secretary Colin Powell for us, or you are with the terrorists. And if being here, as well. He’s doing a magnificent you’re with the terrorists, you will face the job of stitching together one of the greatest consequences. coalitions ever, a coalition of nations that We fight an enemy who hides in caves in stands for freedom. And I want to thank our Afghanistan and in the shadows within in our Attorney General for coming—the man own society. It’s an enemy who can only sur- whose job it is to make sure that any time vive in darkness. Today we’ve taken another we find anybody inside our country who will important action to expose the enemy to the threaten an American, threaten our institu- light and to disrupt its ability to threaten tions, they will be brought to justice. And America and innocent life. that’s exactly what our Nation is doing. I’m proud of the actions of our agencies. Acting on solid and credible evidence, the We’re making a difference. We’re slowly but Treasury Department of the United States surely tightening the noose, and we will be today blocked the U.S. assets of 62 individ- victorious. uals and organizations connected with two Now it’s my honor to welcome the Sec- terror-supporting financial networks, the Al retary of Treasury, Paul O’Neill. Taqwa and the Al Barakaat. Their offices NOTE: The President spoke at 1:52 p.m. in the have been shut down in four U.S. States. And FinCEN office’s Multimedia Room. In his re- our G–8 partners and other friends, including marks, he referred to Shaykh Ahme Nur Jimale, the United Arab Emirates, have joined us in founder, Al Barakaat, and Usama bin Laden, lead- blocking assets and coordinating enforce- er of the Al Qaida terrorist organization. ment action. Al Taqwa is an association of offshore banks and financial management firms that Remarks Following Discussions With have helped Al Qaida shift money around the Prime Minister Tony Blair of the world. Al Barakaat is a group of money-wir- United Kingdom and an Exchange ing and communication companies owned by With Reporters a friend and supporter of Usama bin Laden. November 7, 2001 Al Taqwa and Al Barakaat raise funds for Al Qaida; they manage, invest, and distribute President Bush. The last time we were those funds. They provide terrorist sup- standing here, I was getting ready to give an VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:21 Nov 14, 2001 Jkt 197250 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 E:\PRESDOCS\P45NOT4.009 pfrm01 PsN: P45NOT4 Administration of George W. Bush, 2001 / Nov. 7 1609 address to the United States Congress. And bit as strong today as it was on September I knew then that the Prime Minister and the the 11th. people he represents were going to be great The cause is just. The strategy is there. friends of the United States in our mutual The determination is there, and there is a struggle against terrorism, and he has cer- complete and total commitment to making tainly proven that over the last weeks. We’ve sure that this is a battle in which we will got no better friend in the world than Great prevail, and we will. I have no doubt about Britain. I’ve got no better person that I would that at all. like to talk to about our mutual concerns than What we’ve discussed already and will Tony Blair. He brings a lot of wisdom and carry on discussing is, obviously, the military judgment as we fight evil. strategy in Afghanistan. We have discussed He also is, like me, determined. Nothing the humanitarian issues to make sure that we will deter us in this all-important goal. We are doing everything we possibly can to help both recognize that we wage a fight to save the plight of people in Afghanistan. And we civilization and that we must prevail and, not should never forget that some 41⁄2 million of only must prevail, will prevail. them were refugees before the 11th of Sep- We’ve had a great discussion about tember. progress in Afghanistan. I fully believe we’re We have discussed, also, the reconstruc- making great progress. I told the American tion of Afghanistan, how we make sure that people many times, and I’ve told the press after the present Taliban regime led by corps many times that this is a struggle that’s Mullah Omar is out of the way, that we con- going to take a while, that it’s not one of struct a broad-based regime that is represent- these Kodak moments. There is no moment ative of all the different groupings in Afghan- to this; this is a long struggle and a different istan and offers some hope of stability and kind of war. But we’re patient, and our close prosperity for that part of the world. friends are patient, which is bad news for And we have, obviously, also discussed the Taliban and the people they harbor. how important it is that at this moment in Secondly, we talked a lot about making time, we carry on building that strong coali- sure that our great compassion for the inno- tion against international terrorism in all its cents in Afghanistan is fulfilled. We must forms. And I believe that that coalition, if feed the people. And the Prime Minister anything, is even stronger today. has—every time I’ve talked to him, which is Certainly, from the discussions I had with a lot, is constantly talking about how we make European leaders just a few days ago, their sure that we fulfill the mission, not only mili- commitment is real, and their determination tary but fulfill the mission of helping people is also absolute to see this thing done. So in need. And also, we continue to discuss the can I once again thank President Bush very vision of a post-Taliban Afghanistan, and how much for his kindness in welcoming me here. do we make sure that all parties involved in President Bush. The Prime Minister has that part of the world have a stake in the consented to take a couple of questions, as future? He’s got a clear vision; he is a strong will I. We are going to enforce the one-ques- friend; and I welcome him back to the White tion rule, however, Fournier [Ron Fournier, House. Associated Press]. And that is, you get to ask Prime Minister Blair. First of all, can I me or him a question. [Laughter] say how pleased I am to be back at the White Q. That’s an Executive order? House in the company of President Bush and President Bush. Well—[laughter]. to have continued the discussions we’ve been Prime Minister Blair. It looks like it. having over these past weeks and continue Are you going to go first, George, or what? them face to face. And can I thank him once again for his leadership and his strength at Progress in the War on Terrorism this time. And can I say to him, on behalf Q. It has been 8 weeks since the Sep- of the people of my country, but I believe tember 11th attacks, and we don’t know people right across the world, that the deter- where Usama bin Laden is. It has been sev- mination to see that justice is done is every eral weeks since the anthrax attacks, but we VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:21 Nov 14, 2001 Jkt 197250 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 E:\PRESDOCS\P45NOT4.009 pfrm01 PsN: P45NOT4 1610 Nov.
Recommended publications
  • Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich
    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Generational Divide Will Split Cult of Corbyn the Internal Contradictions Between the Youthful Idealists and Cynical Old Trots Are Becoming Increasingly Exposed
    The Times, 26th September 2017: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/generational-divide- will-split-cult-of-corbyn-c0sbn70mv Generational divide will split cult of Corbyn The internal contradictions between the youthful idealists and cynical old Trots are becoming increasingly exposed Rachael Sylvester A graffiti artist is spray-painting a wall when I arrive at The World Transformed festival, organised by Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters in Momentum. Inside, clay-modelling is under way in a creative workshop that is exploring “the symbiotic relationship between making and thinking”. A “collaborative quilt” hangs in the “creative chaos corner” next to a specially commissioned artwork celebrating the NHS. The young, mainly female volunteers who are staffing the event talk enthusiastically about doing politics in a different way and creating spaces where people can come together to discuss new ideas. It is impossible to ignore the slightly cult-like atmosphere: one member of the audience is wearing a T-shirt printed with the slogan “Corbyn til I die”. But this four-day festival running alongside the official Labour Party conference in Brighton has far more energy and optimism than most political events. There have been two late-night raves, sessions on “acid Corbynism”, and a hackathon, seeking to harness the power of the geeks to solve technological problems. With its own app, pinging real-time updates to followers throughout the day, and a glossy pastel-coloured brochure, the Momentum festival has an upbeat, modern feel. As well as sunny optimism there is a darker, bullying side Then I go to a packed session on “Radical Democracy and Twenty- First Century Socialism”.
    [Show full text]
  • For New & Newly Enthused Labour Party Members
    GUIDE for new & newly enthused Labour Party members Published by Momentum Sheffield [email protected] facebook.com/momentumsheffield join.peoplesmomentum.com 1 The Labour Party rulebook is almost a hundred pages long and written in pure Bureaucratese. This is an attempt to explain the most important rules and structures in plain English. The main rules for members looking to get more involved in the party can be found on three manageable pages in the Model procedural rules (pages 56-58). Contents I) Local Labour Party organisation 1) Branch Labour Parties (BLPs) 2) Constituency Labour Parties (CLPs) 3) Branch and CLP officers 4) CLP Campaign Committee 5) District Labour Party (DLP) II) How to get involved in your local Labour Party 1) Contact your CLP and branch secretary 2) Get involved in Momentum 3) Become a CLP delegate or officer in your branch and CLP 4) Write and move a motion 5) Challenge the chair III) Electing representatives 1) How are council candidates selected? 2) How are parliamentary candidates selected? 3) Selection of MEP candidates 4) Scottish and Welsh Assembly candidates 5) Holding your MP/representative to account IV) National Labour Organisation 1) The National Labour Party The National Executive Committee Party Conference Party Conference - Delegates Party Conference - Voting Party Conference - Agenda General Secretary 2) Regional Structures 3) How the Labour Party makes policy The National Policy Forum Policy Commissions Making Policy 4) Government Forming a Government The Opposition Select Committees The Parliamentary Labour Party V) Useful resources: rule book, jargon buster, etc. 2 I) Local Labour Party organisation 1) Branch Labour Parties (BLPs) The Labour Party is divided into branches, usually based on the ward boundaries for councillors (there are 28 electoral wards in Sheffield).
    [Show full text]
  • Report Back from Momentum, London Labour Left and CLPD Members on the London Regional Executive Committee (REC)
    Report Back from Momentum, London Labour Left and CLPD members on the London Regional Executive Committee (REC). Jargon Buster: REC - Regional Executive Committee ALC – Association of Labour Councillors BAME – Black Asian and Minority Ethnic CAC – Conference Arrangements Committee CLP – Constituency Labour Party LGBTQ+ – Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer+ NCC – National Constitutional Committee NEC – National Executive Committee NPF - National Policy Forum MEP – Member of the European Parliament LCF – Local Campaign Forum RD - Regional Director DRD - Deputy Regional Director This was the second meeting of the new London Regional Executive Committee, previously known as the London Regional Board. The Labour Left REC members were elected at the London Regional Conference, held early March 2019, and represent a considerable majority on the REC. Left REC members were elected on a platform of greater communication, transparency, party democracy and active campaigning. Our key aims are to: ● Ensure that Conference motions are acted upon in a meaningful way (and for them not to simply disappear into a galactic black hole, as our Vice Chair aptly puts it). ● Ensure that our London Labour Mayoral Manifesto reflects the views of our hugely expanded new membership. ● Ensure that members are regularly engaged and included with the work on the board. Introduction & Item 1: Apologies. Sadiq Khan attended an informal pre-meeting prior to the second meeting in order to spend some time to get to know the newly elected members of the REC. Jim Kelly gave Sadiq the opportunity to address the group before the start of the meeting emphasising his objectives and priorities for the year. Item 2: Minutes of the last meeting All the minutes were agreed and Hazel Flynn the regional director made a request that if anyone on the committee wanted to send out information to CLPs it needs to be sent through her team, using the templates provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum Campaigning - Current Campaigns ​
    Momentum Press pack Press pack 1 Contents Pg. 3 About Momentum - Who we are, what we do and a brief history ​ Pg. 5 Key statistics - Our membership, achievements, reach and impact ​ Pg. 8 Momentum campaigning - Current campaigns ​ Pg. 11 Case studies and quotes - From supporters to our critics ​ Pg. 13 Contact information - Momentum’s press team ​ Press pack 2 About us Who we are, what we do and a brief history Who we are Momentum is a people-powered, grassroots social movement working to transform the Labour Party and Britain in the interests of the many, not the few. What we do Momentum isn’t just an organisation - we’re a social movement, made up of tens of thousands of members who share a vision for a transformative Labour government. Momentum connects, mobilises and empowers ordinary people across the country. Together, we campaign locally and nationally to make our communities better, strengthen our rights and get Labour elected. Momentum offers networks, skill-shares and tech to strengthen our movement from the grassroots up. We support members to transform the Labour Party to be democratic and member-led. From Jeremy Corbyn’s successful leadership election, to Labour’s extraordinary electoral comeback in the 2017 general election, Momentum members are central to Labour’s success. A brief history Momentum might be a young organisation, but we’ve achieved a lot. Our members and supporters up and down the country are transforming the Labour Party and Britain for the better. The real story of Momentum is made up of the hundreds of thousands of small actions taken by grassroots members across the UK, but here are the major milestones in our growth and development since our establishment in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does a Satellite Campaign Do? the Use of Momentum in Labour’S 2017 General Election Facebook Campaign
    What does a satellite campaign do? The use of Momentum in Labour’s 2017 General Election Facebook campaign Tristan Hothama aDepartment of Politics, Languages and International Studies, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom Correspondence address - Mr. Tristan Hotham, Department of Politics, Languages and International Studies, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, Somerset, BA2 7AY Tristan Hotham is a PhD candidate at the University of Bath. ***Working Paper*** Word Count: 15919 What does a satellite campaign do? The use of Momentum in Labour’s 2017 General Election Facebook campaign Abstract Satellite campaigns have been discussed as core parts of parties online campaigns. However, study is needed to understand the specifics of what satellite campaigns are, where they fit and how they are used as part of parties’ social media election campaigns. This article comparatively examines Facebook pages across the 2017 general election; Momentum, Labour Party page and Labour leader page information and participation content is comparatively investigated to understand what sets satellite campaigning apart. Findings show that Labour had generated a Facebook approach termed ‘Janus-faced campaigning’. Labour was using leader, party and satellite pages with diverse approaches to speak to different audiences, thus presenting different faces of the same party to the public. The party engaged in two core forms of approach. The 'traditional Facebook campaign' via the leader and party page, saw the party using core policy messages, open inclusive rhetoric and a focus on information over participation to campaign to the mass public. This approach was supported by what is termed the 'new methods Facebook campaign'. Here, satellite page Momentum focused equally on participation and information, using novel, partisan and divisive content, large amounts of leadership personalisation and humour, to activate a younger more partisan audience and get them campaigning online and offline.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
    Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents:
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Interview: James Schneider
    James Schneider Co-founder of Momentum Spokesperson & Head of Strategic Communications, Office of the Leader of the Opposition. October 2016 – January 2020 11 January 2021 The referendum UK in a Changing Europe (UKICE): How engaged was Momentum with the referendum campaign in 2016? James Schneider (JS): Initially, we didn’t have a position on the referendum and weren’t doing anything, but myself and some others thought that was a completely unsustainable position. We suspected that the overwhelming bulk of our members and supporters would want us to campaign for Remain. So, we conducted an internal poll and found that this was the case, with around 80% wanting us to campaign for Remain, and used that as our reasoning with the Steering Committee to shift into campaigning for Remain. Then, very quickly, we began working with Another Europe is Possible, who moved into Momentum’s offices. We worked together closely on canvassing, we did some stunts, and had some involvement with the disastrous ‘Battle of the Thames’. I wasn’t on a boat. I was on a bridge, but others were on boats. It was quite a bad moment. When there’s Bob Geldof giving two fingers to fishermen, it’’s like that Mitchell and Webb sketch where they ask: ‘Are we the baddies?’ Is Bob Geldof and a bunch of poshos on his big boat, telling fishermen to get fucked, really good? No, probably not. It was quite a bad day and felt like we were losing. Then the next day Jo Cox was killed. Page 1/33 UKICE: Did you have any other reservations about the way Labour approached the whole referendum campaign? JS: I thought the main Labour campaign – the Alan Johnson, Hilary Benn one – was very limp, and quite establishment, and, therefore not terribly effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum As a Movement Faction James Dennis School of Film, Media and Communicati
    A party within a party posing as a movement? Momentum as a Movement Faction James Dennis School of Film, Media and Communication, University of Portsmouth Abstract This article examines how the UK political organization Momentum uses social media within its campaigning. Drawing on a mixed-method research design, combining interviews with activists in Portsmouth and discourse analysis of content posted on Facebook and Twitter, this article tests whether the leadership provides meaningful influence for members. At the national level, there is little evidence of Momentum fulfilling its “people-powered” vision. Instead, supporters are instructed to undertake tasks at the direction of the leadership. However, this is not a straightforward case of controlled interactivity. The local group in Portsmouth is semi- autonomous, providing member-driven advocacy that is coordinated through a Facebook Group. By using social media to underpin different organizational norms and campaigning tactics at different spatial levels, Momentum represents a “movement faction”. Keywords: activism; campaigning; engagement; Labour Party; Momentum; political parties; social movements; social media Forthcoming in Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 2020 “Author’s Accepted Manuscript,” December 3, 2019, for UK Research Excellence FrameworK eligibility. Please read and cite the final copyedited and typeset version of this article, which can be found here: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/witp20 1 With a reported 40,000 members, 200,000 supporters, and over 170 local groups across the UK, Momentum, the political activist group founded in the wake of Jeremy Corbyn’s rise to leader of the Labour Party, has become an insurgent force in British politics (Cowburn, 2017; Momentum, 2018d).1 Scholars have cited the group's digital campaigning tactics when seeking to understand the unexpected gains for Labour in the 2017 UK general election (Dommett and Temple, 2018; McDowell-Naylor, 2019; Rhodes, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the UK
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Antisemitism in the UK Tenth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 October 2016 HC 136 Published on 16 October 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership James Berry MP (Conservative, Kingston and Surbiton) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield, Southgate) Nusrat Ghani MP (Conservative, Wealden) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) (Interim Chair) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Naz Shah MP (Labour, Bradford West) Mr Chuka Umunna MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) [Victoria Atkins has been appointed to a Government post and is taking no further part in Committee activities. She will be formally discharged from the Committee by a Motion of the House, and a replacement appointed, in due course] The following were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Keir Starmer MP (Labour, Holborn and St Pancras) Anna Turley MP (Labour (Co-op), Redcar) Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Decision to Go to War in Iraq
    BRITISH PRIME MINISTER TONY BLAIR’ S DECISION TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ: AN EVALUATION OF MOTIVATING FACTORS Kimberly LaCoco, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2009 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Randolf Campbell, Committee Member Gustav Seligmann, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Michael Monticino, Interim Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies LaCoco, Kimberly. British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Decision to Go to War in Iraq: An Evaluation of Motivating Factors. Master of Science (History), May 2009, 136 pp., bibliography, 120 titles. Blair sent British troops to join U.S. forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 at great political cost to himself. What motivated him to take this step? Sources for this work include: autobiographies and biographies of individuals close to Blair; journal and newspaper articles and monographs on this topic; Prime Minister’s speeches and press conferences. Part one is comprised of five chapters including the Introduction; Blair’s years at school; Blair’s early political career; and From Parliament to Prime Minister. Part two includes four chapters that analyze motivating factors such as, Anglo-American Relations; Blair’s personality, faith, and his relationship with Gordon Brown; and finally, Blair’s perception of Britain’s Manifest Destiny. All of these factors played a role in Blair’s decision. Copyright 2009 by Kimberly LaCoco ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance I received from Professor Emeritus Sir Brian Harrison who has recently published Seeking a Role: The United Kingdom 1951-1970.
    [Show full text]