DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Vs Digital Tabletop Games

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Vs Digital Tabletop Games Physical vs Digital Tabletop Games Andreas Larsson Jonas Ekblad Main field: Computer Science ​ Program: Game Development ​ Bachelor thesis 15 credits Spring 2020 Supervisor: José Maria Font Fernandez ​ Examiner: Alberto Enrique Alvarez Uribe ​ Final seminar: 1 June 2020 ​ 1 Physical vs Digital Tabletop Games Abstract This paper shows the difference in User Experience between Physical and Digital tabletop games. The goal of the project is to get an understanding of how and why playing tabletop games differentiates depending on the platform. Seven tabletop games have been chosen from different genres with an official digital adaptation. We’ve measured four key factors, Usability, Aesthetics, Social Connectivity and Engagement. The key factors have been used to gather User Experience metrics that were used to compare the digital and physical versions of the tabletop games. The result from this thesis is that physical tabletop games have a higher rating than the digital versions in all key factors except in usability where the differences were miniscule. Games that rely on imperfect information offer a much higher social connectivity and engagement when it’s played around a table. Games relying on tile-placement offers a higher usability and engagement when played digitally due to the assistance provided by the game. Physical tabletop games are the preferred option of the two but the accessibility of the digital versions makes them remain relevant. 1. Introduction Tabletop games have been around for thousands of years [1] and are now at their peak [2]. Games like Talisman, Magic: The Gathering and other popular titles are showing up on the digital platform. The digital versions make games more accessible than their physical versions. The online mode also gives the user a quick access to play with friends or strangers. Thanks to the digital adaptations, you can bring hundreds of tabletop games on your laptop instead of carrying around the physical games that stack up and take up space. Playing tabletop games on the computer might change User Experience. Chief Marketing Officer of Asmodee Digital, Phillipe Dao claims “You can't really recreate the exact transposition of a physical board game to a digital platform; it's not possible,”. He further claims ”You can't replace the fact that you're playing with friends or family around the table and all the social interactions that you can have... So from this point of view you never have cannibalisation because it's a different experience” [3]. Researching this would let future developers or researchers make a better estimate of success concerning transitioning their tabletop game to digital. As well as what to expect concerning what users want in digital versions. This study aims to fill this gap by first analysing seven tabletop games and their digital versions to 2 determine how they differ in terms of gameplay mechanics. The selection was made to cover the majority of existing genres. Following that a testphase where playtesters play both the physical and digital versions of the games while being monitored for reactions, conversations and mood. After finishing a set amount of sessions the participants are given a questionnaire. These will be the go to source of information to measure the user experiences. 1.1 Research Questions RQ1: What do players prefer in physical over digital tabletop games, or the opposite? RQ2: What aspects of the game disappear in its digital implementation and is this a good thing? RQ3: How does impressions of the game mechanics vary between the digital and physical version? 2. Related Research 2.1 Game Analysis Clara Fernández-Vara describes how a game analysis should start with the participants playing the game extensively and critically. Playing critically requires making a series of choices about how to play since our choices may yield different information, we have to be methodical and aware of what we do while we play. This is followed by analysing the game context and mechanics. Clara Fernández-Vara suggests using these questions for describing the gameplay mechanics [4]. ● What does the player do in the game? ● What are the verbs that describe the basic actions? ● What are the core mechanics of the game? ● How are they meaningful? ● Which actions are less frequent? ● How does the player perform the actions in the game? Fernández further explains about elements such as surprising aspects of the interactions, assumptions made by the game, frustrations, recurring patterns and relationships with the context. 2.2 Measuring the User Experience In 2008, a book named Measuring the User Experience by William Albert and Arthur Thulis took up ​ methods of how to measure UX (User Experience) data[5]. They believe that the UX revolves around 3 ​ characteristics. ● A user is involved ● That user is interacting with a product, system, or really anything with an interface ● The users’ experience is of interest, and observable or measurable UX’s is increasingly getting a more important role as the product's complexity is getting more complex. With the use of UX in the development of complex products, there’s a possibility for them to still remain efficient, user friendly and engaging. Some of the metrics they take up as important are: task success, 3 user satisfaction, and errors. There are several questions that are needed to be answered between the physical and digital board games: ● Will the product be recommended by the users? ● Is the digital product more efficient than its physical counterpart? ● Are the core mechanics improved in the digital adaptation? ● How does the UX of this product compare with the other version? The benefit of using UX metrics is measuring the magnitude of an issue instead of being an assumption. In this study the focus is comparing the UX between tabletop games with their digital counterpart. The ideal way of doing this, according to William Albert and Thomas Tullis, is by using the following steps; Task Success, Efficiency, Self-reported Metrics and Combined & Comparative Metrics. Task success measures that the user is able to perform certain tasks without help. Efficiency revolves around the time required to complete a task. An example of such a task would be placing tokens or setting up a session. The impact of efficiency may give interesting results as in the digital versions, most menial tasks such as shuffling a deck, dealing out cards and keeping the score are automatically managed, saving the user time. On the other hand, the time it takes to manage these tasks could potentially add to the social aspect as it gives them an opportunity to converse [6]. Self-Reported Metrics are metrics we gather by asking the participants about their experience. This will be managed by constructing questionnaires using a method known as GUESS[11]. These questionnaires will be using a Likert scale that is a statement which the users rate their level of agreement. The statements are from a positive standpoint and are scaled from 1-7 where high values are positive responses. Last step, Combined & Comparative metrics about what to do once all data has been gathered. As the name suggests, the data will be combined and then compared to one another. The comparisons will mostly be focused on physical and digital versions of each game but it can also be used to compare all physical and digital games as a whole. 2.3 Rise of board games The popularity and production of board games has had a steady increase ever since the 1950s with a couple of spikes here and there. One of the earlier spikes occurred around 1979 when the award Spiel de Jahres (“Game of the Year”) was introduced, awarding the best Card and Tabletop game of the year [7]. It was during the introduction of the class Eurogame, also known as German-style board game, that the production of games made the most significant spike. These are games that generally require the player to put in more thought and planning into their decision than party games. The most noticeable Eurogame was Settlers of Catan that was introduced 1995. After this the interest of tabletop games has increased and become more accessible due to the availability of various media. The Internet and Social Media gave players possibilities to connect and build communities. The online forum and game database Boardgamegeek rank went from 6000th to 2700th on the Most Popular Website between the years 2012-2020 [8]. 4 Youtube and other streaming media offered ways to observe gameplay and reviews that has contributed to the increased interest in tabletop games. There are more reasons behind how and why tabletop games have grown in production and popularity but these are what’s considered the most important. Milestones: ● Spiel de Jahres ● Settlers of Catan ● Pandemic ● Kickstarter ● TabletTop Show Figure 2.3.1 Represents the number of board games published every year up to 2015 [9]. ​ “According to ICv2, a trade publication that covers board games, comic books, and other hobbyist products, sales of hobby board games in the U.S. and Canada increased from an estimated $75 million to $305 million between 2013 and ​ ​ 2016, the latest year for which data is available” [10]. ​ 3. Description of Method In this study we are going to figure out how the player experience may vary depending on what platform they’re playing on. As a player may enjoy rolling the dice, they may not enjoy the micro management of the pieces. We’ve avoided tools/games that aren't considered an official digital adaptation of the games. The importance of leading playtests in a correct manner will be crucial. Playtests run without preparation could lead to a faulty result. Also the importance of knowing what to look for and the most optimal way of gathering information and reaching a correct conclusion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clues About Bluffing in Clue: Is Conventional Wisdom Wise?
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Department of Electrical Department of Electrical Engineering and Engineering and Computer Science Computer Science 2019 Clues About Bluffing in Clue: Is Conventional Wisdom Wise? David Hansen Kyle D. Hansen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/eecs_fac Part of the Engineering Commons Clues About Bluffing in Clue : Is Conventional Wisdom Wise? David M. Hansen Affiliate Member, IEEE1, Kyle D. Hansen2 1College of Engineering, George Fox University, Newberg, OR, USA 2Westmont College, Santa Barabara, CA, USA We have used the board game Clue as a pedagogical tool in our course on Artificial Intelligence to teach formal logic through the development of logic-based computational game-playing agents. The development of game-playing agents allows us to experimentally test many game-play strategies and we have encountered some surprising results that refine “conventional wisdom” for playing Clue. In this paper we consider the effect of the oft-used strategy wherein a player uses their own cards when making suggestions (i.e., “bluffing”) early in the game to mislead other players or to focus on acquiring a particular kind of knowledge. We begin with an intuitive argument against this strategy together with a quantitative probabilistic analysis of this strategy’s cost to a player that both suggest “bluffing” should be detrimental to winning the game. We then present our counter-intuitive simulation results from playing computational agents that “bluff” against those that do not that show “bluffing” to be beneficial. We conclude with a nuanced assessment of the cost and benefit of “bluffing” in Clue that shows the strategy, when used correctly, to be beneficial and, when used incorrectly, to be detrimental.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexible Games by Which I Mean Digital Game Systems That Can Accommodate Rule-Changing and Rule-Bending
    Let’s Play Our Way: Designing Flexibility into Card Game Systems Gifford Cheung A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: David Hendry, Chair David McDonald Nicolas Ducheneaut Jennifer Turns Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Information School ©Copyright 2013 Gifford Cheung 2 University of Washington Abstract Let’s Play Our Way: Designing Flexibility into Card Game Systems Gifford Cheung Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor David Hendry Information School In this dissertation, I explore the idea of designing “flexible game systems”. A flexible game system allows players (not software designers) to decide on what rules to enforce, who enforces them, and when. I explore this in the context of digital card games and introduce two design strategies for promoting flexibility. The first strategy is “robustness”. When players want to change the rules of a game, a robust system is able to resist extreme breakdowns that the new rule would provoke. The second is “versatility”. A versatile system can accommodate multiple use-scenarios and can support them very well. To investigate these concepts, first, I engage in reflective design inquiry through the design and implementation of Card Board, a highly flexible digital card game system. Second, via a user study of Card Board, I analyze how players negotiate the rules of play, take ownership of the game experience, and communicate in the course of play. Through a thematic and grounded qualitative analysis, I derive rich descriptions of negotiation, play, and communication. I offer contributions that include criteria for flexibility with sub-principles of robustness and versatility, design recommendations for flexible systems, 3 novel dimensions of design for gameplay and communications, and rich description of game play and rule-negotiation over flexible systems.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the World Rulebook
    TM RULES OF PLAY Introduction Components “With bronze as a mirror, one can correct one’s appearance; with history as a mirror, one can understand the rise and fall of a state; with good men as a mirror, one can distinguish right from wrong.” – Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty History of the World takes 3–6 players on an epic ride through humankind’s history. From the dawn of civilization to the twentieth century, you will witness humanity in all its majesty. Great minds work toward technological advances, ambitious leaders inspire their 1 Game Board 150 Armies citizens, and unpredictable calamities occur—all amid the rise and fall (6 colors, 25 of each) of empires. A game consists of five epochs of time, in which players command various empires at the height of their power. During your turn, you expand your empire across the globe, gaining points for your conquests. Forge many a prosperous empire and defeat your adversaries, for at the end of the game, only the player with the most 24 Capitols/Cities 20 Monuments (double-sided) points will have his or her immortal name etched into the annals of history! Catapult and Fort Assembly Note: The lighter-colored sides of the catapult should always face upward and outward. 14 Forts 1 Catapult Egyptians Ramesses II (1279–1213 BCE) WEAPONRY I EPOCH 4 1500–450 BCE NILE Sumerians 3 Tigris – Empty Quarter Egyptians 4 Nile Minoans 3 Crete – Mediterranean Sea Hittites 4 Anatolia During this turn, when you fight a battle, Assyrians 6 Pyramids: Build 1 monument for every Mesopotamia – Empty Quarter 1 resource icon (instead of every 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Experimental Autobiography from Counterculture Comics to Transmedia Storytelling: Staging Encounters Across Time, Space, and Medium
    Women's Experimental Autobiography from Counterculture Comics to Transmedia Storytelling: Staging Encounters Across Time, Space, and Medium Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Ohio State University Alexandra Mary Jenkins, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Jared Gardner, Advisor Sean O’Sullivan Robyn Warhol Copyright by Alexandra Mary Jenkins 2014 Abstract Feminist activism in the United States and Europe during the 1960s and 1970s harnessed radical social thought and used innovative expressive forms in order to disrupt the “grand perspective” espoused by men in every field (Adorno 206). Feminist student activists often put their own female bodies on display to disrupt the disembodied “objective” thinking that still seemed to dominate the academy. The philosopher Theodor Adorno responded to one such action, the “bared breasts incident,” carried out by his radical students in Germany in 1969, in an essay, “Marginalia to Theory and Praxis.” In that essay, he defends himself against the students’ claim that he proved his lack of relevance to contemporary students when he failed to respond to the spectacle of their liberated bodies. He acknowledged that the protest movements seemed to offer thoughtful people a way “out of their self-isolation,” but ultimately, to replace philosophy with bodily spectacle would mean to miss the “infinitely progressive aspect of the separation of theory and praxis” (259, 266). Lisa Yun Lee argues that this separation continues to animate contemporary feminist debates, and that it is worth returning to Adorno’s reasoning, if we wish to understand women’s particular modes of theoretical ii insight in conversation with “grand perspectives” on cultural theory in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitising Boardgames: Issues and Tensions
    Digitising Boardgames: Issues and Tensions Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs, Wally Smith Microsoft Research Centre for Social Natural User Interfaces The University of Melbourne Parkville, Vic, 3010 +61 3 8344 1394, +61 3 8344 1494 [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper, we discuss the different ways in which modern European boardgames (“Eurogames”) are converted for digital play. We review digitised versions of three popular tabletop boardgames: Puerto Rico, Agricola and Ascension. Using these examples, we demonstrate the tension between the interaction metaphor of the original analogue medium and the metaphor of a digital game. We describe the importance of housekeeping chores to gameplay and position them as a form of articulation work, which is typically hidden by digital implementations. Further, we demonstrate the types of information that are created through digital play and discuss how this influences game play of both digital and physical boardgames. Keywords Board games, interaction metaphor, articulation, theorycrafting, informating INTRODUCTION Boardgames, traditionally played in their physical format using boards, cards, dice, playing tokens and the like, are increasingly being translated to digital form for devices such as smartphones, computers, videogame systems and tablets. To date, little attention has been paid to how and the degree to which this digitisation affects or transforms the experience of play. There is growing tension between the desire for digitised boardgames to be true to the interaction metaphor (Sharp et al. 2007, 58-63) of the original medium and the desire to extend the game to explore the potential of the digital medium.
    [Show full text]
  • French Revolution Board Game
    Name ____________________________ Block ___________ French Revolution Board Game With so much happening and so many twists and turns, it is hard not to compare the French Revolution to an awesome history-based board game. Luckily, you get the opportunity to make one! Your task is to create a board game that is fun to play, and teaches players about the French Revolution (even if they don’t know they are learning). Your game should cover the events from the meeting of the Three Estates in 1789 to the Congress of Vienna in 1815. You may make up an entirely new game or start with an existing game and modify the set up. Some possibilities: • Change a Monopoly board so that the properties and pieces fit the French Revolution and not beachfront gambling towns. • Revisit the game of Life with revolutionary tracks rather than career choices. • Trivia-based game where number of moves is based on answering questions. • Revise Chutes and Ladders to reflect the changes in France during the Revolution. Rubric DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA EXCELLENT ADEQUATE SCORE EXPECTATIONS Relates clearly to each Misses some phases or Game does not relate to Information phase of the French key people and events, the French Revolution ___/25 Revolution with but uses some French except in name only. accurate information. Revolution ideas. Includes all parts* and Instructions are unclear Not a playable game. Playability is ready to be played. or not included. Missing necessary pieces or not ___/25 enough cards for full game. Creatively modifies all Basic structure of the Simply makes name Attention to elements of gameplay original game is the changes to an existing Detail and set up for a same, with some game or makes few ___/25 complete French relevant modifications efforts to creatively Revolution experience.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| the Struggling State 1St Edition
    THE STRUGGLING STATE 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Jennifer Riggan | 9781439912720 | | | | | Supporting Resources How kindergarten entry assessments are used in public schools and how they correlate with spring The Struggling State 1st edition REL — Department of Education and U. October 20, However, when Alan Moonan influential designer of Eurogamesendorsed the game the first printing sold out quickly. As of Novembermore than 80, The Struggling State 1st edition were being served in schools that are in the process of adopting the Kansas Integrated MTSS framework. Table 2. Department of Education USED issued two letters reminding states that intervention strategies cannot be used to delay or deny evaluation of students suspected of having The Struggling State 1st edition disability. In addition, the New Press released an updated version of The Wall Charts for A People's History —a 2-piece fold-out poster featuring an illustrated timeline of The Struggling State 1st edition. Coupled with that is the game's accessibility and the design's cleverness, all of which make Twilight Struggle stand out among the crowd of recent political wargame releases. Is banning mobile phones in schools a good idea? We can identify at-risk students early. High absolute and net teacher turnover—i. For example, some students perform well in some content areas and not others, or they may score too high on assessments used to determine eligibility for special education. Turnover and attrition have been increasing over time Goldring, Taie, and Riddles and are higher for U. Advocates are also exploring data-based individualization DBI for students in the most intensive tier of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Different Paths for Tabletop Gaming in School Libraries
    Three Different Paths for Tabletop Gaming in School Libraries Teresa Copeland, Brenda Henderson, Brian Mayer, and Scott Nicholson Abstract Three school library staff members explore how they have used table- top games in different school library settings. Teresa Copeland (Tes- seract School, Paradise Valley, Arizona, USA) explores how tabletop and role-playing games have been integrated into the curriculum across a wide variety of grade levels. Brenda Henderson (Trinity High School Learning Resources Centre, Redditch, UK) discusses how a board game club has made a difference in a high school library in the United Kingdom. Brian Mayer (School Library System, Genesee Valley Educational Partnership, LeRoy, New York, USA) supports multiple school libraries in finding matches between the curriculum and authentic games and runs game design workshops. Introduction Gaming in school libraries is evenly split between two primary goals: ed- ucation and recreation (Nicholson, 2008). Some libraries have worked with teachers to integrate games into the curriculum. Other libraries have created recreational programs around games where students can engage with each other in a safe space. One advantage of gaming programs in school libraries is that tabletop games, if chosen properly, can be both ed- ucational and recreational. Good educational games are also good games, and recreational tabletop gaming facilitates social engagement, planning, decision making, and mathematics. The focus in this article is on nondigital games: board, card, and role- playing games that are played on tables instead of on screens. Most stu- dents are used to digital games but may not have familiarity with tabletop gaming. Tabletop games are inexpensive, have a long shelf-life, are porta- ble, and can be used in a much wider variety of classroom situations than LIBRARY TRENDS, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Analog Learning Games: Genre Affordances, Limitations and Multi-Game Approaches
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Articles Faculty & Staff Scholarship Summer 9-2020 Designing Analog Learning Games: Genre Affordances, Limitations and Multi-Game Approaches Owen Gottlieb Rochester Institute of Technology Ian Schreiber Rochester Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/article Part of the African History Commons, Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Architectural History and Criticism Commons, Civil Law Commons, Cultural History Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Game Design Commons, History of Religion Commons, Instructional Media Design Commons, Interactive Arts Commons, Interdisciplinary Arts and Media Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Studies Commons, Medieval History Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, Religion Law Commons, Religious Education Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons, Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Gottlieb, Owen and Schreiber, Ian. (2020). Designing Analog Learning Games: Genre Affordances, Limitations, and Multi-Game Approaches. In Douglas Brown and Esther MacCallum Stewart (editors), Rerolling Boardgames: Essays on Themes, Systems, Experiences, and Ideologies (pp. 195-211). McFarland & Company, Inc. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty & Staff Scholarship at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Appears in: Gottlieb, Owen and Schreiber, Ian. (2020). Designing Analog Learning Games: Genre Affordances, Limitations, and Multi-Game Approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Communication Arts and Sciences THE LONG TWILIGHT STRUGGLE: PRESIDENTIAL RHETORIC AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE COLD WAR, 1945-1974 A Dissertation in Communication Arts and Sciences by Sara Ann Mehltretter Drury © 2011 Sara Ann Mehltretter Drury Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2011 The dissertation of Sara Ann Mehltretter Drury was reviewed and approved* by the following: J. Michael Hogan Liberal Arts Research Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Jeremy Engels Assistant Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences J. Philip Jenkins Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Humanities Department of History and Religious Studies Thomas W. Benson Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Rhetoric Head of Department of Communication Arts and Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This study explores the discourse of U.S. presidents as they defined and redefined the concept of “national security” during the Cold War. As commander-in- chief and the most visible spokesman for the United States in world affairs, the president has enormous power to shape understandings of national security strategy and foreign policy. The project consists of a series of four case studies in presidential speech making on national security: Harry S. Truman’s “Truman Doctrine” speech; Dwight Eisenhower’s “Age of Peril” radio address; John F. Kennedy’s “Inaugural Address”; and the speeches of Richard Nixon during his February 1972 trip to the People’s Republic of China. I argue that each of these episodes marked a significant moment in the rhetoric of national security, as each president promoted a new understanding of the nature of the threats to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Developments in the Evolution of Tabletop Game Design
    Major Developments in the Evolution of Tabletop Game Design Frederick Reiber Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences University of California Irvine Irvine, USA [email protected] Abstract—Tabletop game design is very much an incremental these same concepts can and have been used in video game art. Designers build upon the ideas of previous games, often design. improving and combining already defined game mechanics. In Although some of these breakthroughs might be already this work, we look at a collection of the most impactful tabletop game designs, or games that have caused a significant shift in known by long time game designers, it is important to formally the tabletop game design space. This work seeks to record those document these developments. By doing so, we can not only shifts, and does so with the aid of empirical analysis. For each bridge the gap between experienced and novice game design- game, a brief description of the game’s history and mechanics ers, but we can also begin to facilitate scholarly discussion on is given, followed by a discussion on its impact within tabletop the evolution of games. Furthermore, this research is of interest game design. to those within the tabletop game industry as it provides Index Terms—Game Design, Mechanics, Impact. analysis on major developments in the field. It is also our belief that this work can be useful to academics, specifically I. INTRODUCTION those in the fields of game design, game analytics, and game There are many elements that go into creating a successful generation AI. tabletop game.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Strategic Board Games As a Site for Distributed Computational Thinking
    This paper appeared in a special issue of the International Journal of Game-Based Learning edited by Patrick Felicia and Guest Editor Sean C. Duncan, Copyright 2011, IGI Global, www.igi-global.com. Posted by permission of the publisher. Please cite this work as: Berland, M., & Lee, V. R. (2011). Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 65-81. doi: 10.4018/ijgbl.2011040105 InternatIonal Journal of Game-Based learnInG April-June 2011, Vol. 1, No. 2 Table of Contents Special Issue from the Games+Learning+Society Conference (GLS 6.0) guest editorial Preface i Diversity, Design, and Possibility: Introduction to the GLS 6.0 Special Issue Sean C. Duncan, Miami University, USA research articles 1 Leveraging Mobile Games for Place-Based Language Learning Christopher L. Holden, University of New Mexico, USA Julie M. Sykes, University of New Mexico, USA 19 DataPlay: Experiments in the Ludic Age Colleen Macklin, Parsons the New School for Design, USA 34 Possibility Spaces: Using The Sims 2 as a Sandbox to Explore Possible Selves with At-Risk Teenage Males Elizabeth King, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA 52 Affordances and Constraints of Scaffolded Learning in a Virtual World for Young Children Rebecca W. Black, University of California, Irvine, USA Stephanie M. Reich, University of California, Irvine, USA 65 Collaborative Strategic Board Games as a Site for Distributed Computational Thinking Matthew Berland, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA Victor R. Lee, Utah State University, USA 82 Forming The Guild: Star Power and Rethinking Projective Identity In Affinity Spaces Elizabeth Ellcessor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Sean C.
    [Show full text]