Turning to Protestantism and Anabaptism in 16Th-Century Venice
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Riccarda Suitner The good citizen and the heterodox self: turning to Protestantism and Anabaptism in 16th-century Venice In the following pages, I wish to discuss conversions within the specific context of the so-called ‘Radical Reformation’, tackling issues such as their similarities with and differences from other types of intra-Christian conversion, and the legal and psychological implications of this decision. The Venetian Republic lends itself best to a survey of this type, particularly during the period between the 1540s and 1560s. These years saw numerous conversions to Protestantism and at the same time the high point of the local Anabaptist movement. Furthermore, these decades saw the first trials of the Inquisition, which as we know was established in 1542 but only came into full force very slowly; during the period of interest here it had not yet succeeded in radically undermining the organisation of Venetian heterodox groups as it did in the second half of the century. Finally, for numer- ous reasons the conversions of inhabitants of these regions were rather different from those that took place elsewhere. The analysis of the modalities with which factors such as conversion, Nicodemism, confessional eclecticism, and exile came to interact with each other in some milieus of this city provides an excellent example of the exercise of individual religious choice in early modern Europe – which is here strictly related to other phenomena such as plurality of personae and of multiple religious ‘identities’, and thus with ways of ‘parting the self’. 1 Embracing the Reformation in early 16th-century Venice The authorities of the Venetian Republic had numerous reasons to close one eye to suspected cases of heterodoxy and to allow non-Catholic individuals at least to reside on its territory. One of these was the web of commercial relations with the populations of central Europe and the Ottoman Empire, often mediated by Jews. The Fondaco dei Tedeschi, the Fondaco dei Turchi, the Jewish ghetto and Note: I am very grateful to Shahzad Bashir, Antje Linkenbach, Aditya Malik, Martin Mulsow and Jutta Vinzent for discussions during the preparation of this article. Open Access. © 2019 Riccarda Suitner, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580853-022 460 Riccarda Suitner their various synagogues (though some crypto-Jews lived outside the ghetto) were among the places intended to spatially delimit confessional divisions. The latter were on the one hand aimed at preventing contacts with the Italian population and simultaneously (at least in the eyes of the Venetian authorities) also served in some ways to ‘protect’ these religious minorities from potential attacks by the local population. Obviously, that adopted in Venice was a concept of ‘religious tolerance’ typical of the early modern period which has little in common with the current meaning of this expression (for a detailed analysis of this notion see Forst 2003; Salatowsky, Schröder 2016; Vollhardt, Bach, Multhammer 2015). This was a sort of paternalistic concession, made essentially for reasons of convenience, of a minimal number of rights, on the part of a religiously homogeneous and cohesive community, to individuals seen as posing a potential danger to the social order; they could not expect to become fully integrated, but merely to be ‘tolerated’ and not to risk death or forced conversion. Not coincidentally, these groups were permitted only to perform specific jobs and were obliged in various ways to ‘signal’ their difference. For example, Jews had to wear a specific type of hat and, if they were students at the University of Padua, paid higher uni- versity fees (see Ravid 2003). Furthermore, spaces were divided in accordance with rigorous confessional criteria, we can think for example of the Fondaco dei Turchi or the Jewish ghetto; in the case of multi-confessional spaces, these were conceived to allow the authorities simultaneously to isolate and to control non-Catholic individuals. A well-known example of such spaces is the casa dei catecumeni, established in imitation of similar institutions disseminated around the Ottoman Empire, where, when necessary, conversion processes were regu- lated (as an introduction to the link between space and conversion in the early modern period see Marcocci et al. 2015; specifically on the casa dei catecumeni see Matheus 2013). All of this, obviously, had only a minimal impact on the Catholic, Italian- speaking population, towards which – and particularly towards those who turned to Protes- tantism – there was no need to demonstrate any sort of ‘tolerance’. Nonetheless, the penetration of the Reformed ideas into Venetian territory was easier than else- where in Italy, given the larger volume of international contacts and the existence – mentioned above – of foreigners in the city, alongside other factors: the flourishing and relatively free book industry; and Venetian political independence, pervaded from the earliest centuries of its history by a strong anti-Roman – and therefore anti-Papal – sentiment that led it to demand and practise a strong autonomy in decision-making also expressed in matters of the repression of religious dissent (classic studies on Venetian history are Lane 1973; Zorzi 1979; Landwehr 2007; Bouwsma 1968; specifically on the Venetian Inquisition see Grendler 1977; Pullan The good citizen and the heterodox self 461 1997; Del Col 2012, 342–94). The dissemination of Lutheran and Calvinist doctrines on Venetian soil – though mainly ‘second hand’ – and above all of the works of Erasmus and perhaps also those of Servetus (see for instance Seidel Menchi 1993; Felici 2010; Ongaro 1971), suddenly opened up a range of options: conversion to Lutheranism, Calvinism or one of those more ‘radical’ versions of the Reformation that, harking back to preconciliar Christianity, rejected the Trinity and the baptism of infants. In the two former cases, the two possibilities open to the convert were dissimulation or flight. The ‘dissimulative’ approach is so-called Nicodemism, a famous term thought to originate with Calvin, who introduced it in 1543 with specific reference to Italian crypto-Protestants (though the practice was widespread and theorised not just by Juan de Valdés and other Italian reformers, but also in some German reformed circles to the ‘left of the Reformation’, like that of Otto Brunfels), initially studied by Delio Cantimori, Antonio Rotondò, Carlo Simoncelli and Carlo Ginzburg, and later by numerous other scholars. The expression designated, in modern histori- ography, the doctrine of the permissibility of religious simulation, the deliberate concealment of Protestant belief beneath a veil of Catholic observance (Cantimori 1948; Rotondò 1967; Ginzburg 1970; Simoncelli 1979; Biondi 1974; Eire 1985). Often the Nicodemite attitude culminated, as we know thanks to the numerous tran- scripts of trials held in the Venice State Archive, with an abjuration that could be followed by a conviction or otherwise, often entailing the death penalty. One Nicodemite was Paolo d’Avanzo. This young man, aged about thirty, from Città di Castello, a small town in present-day Umbria, worked in the 1560s in the Rialto area for the Florentine leather merchant Michelangelo Baglione (see Archivio di Stato Veneto, hereafter cited as ASVE, Savi all’eresia, b. 29, file ‘Paolo d’Avanzo’, fol. 1r: ‘Paulo d’Avanzo […] prattica in Rialto et veste alla forestiera giovane di 30 anni in circa con poca barba’). The first charge laid against him was that of a conversion to Calvinism, the second that of owning forbidden books. The second charge was dropped after a search in the house of Donato Baglione, the son of the merchant under whom he served, where no subversive books were found. The accounts given by the various witnesses who testified during the trial against him from 1568 onwards and his own evidence provide us not only with insights into the life of a young emigrant to Venice, but above all with an idea of the concrete stages involved in a conversion in Venice at this time. The young man had relatives in Geneva and an uncle, Pompeo, in Lyon. The latter had fervently praised the sermons of the local Huguenot community, whilst his relatives in Geneva had convinced him of the superiority of the Calvinist doc- trine amongst those of the Reformed world. He himself had travelled to Geneva for work. D’Avanzo was just an errand boy, but he nonetheless had the opportu- nity to travel, and came into contact not just with other merchants but also with 462 Riccarda Suitner the different social classes in the city of Venice: the Buccella family, the doctor Ludovico Abbioso, Paolo Moscardo (ibid.). Among those who chose the second alternative – to emigrate abroad – some succeeded in attaining a status very close to full integration (Cantimori 1939). This is true of Guglielmo Gratarolo, a student of medicine first in Padua and then at the Collegio dei fisici in Venice. The bibliography on Gratarolo, rather than on religious issues, focuses mostly on his keen interest in alchemy and the natural sciences and on his activity as editor of Pietro Pomponazzi’s works. Indeed, if we examine his religious views as well, we see that he survived a first trial that ended with an abjuration (see ASVE, b. 10). After fleeing the Veneto in 1550, Gratarolo settled in Basle in 1552, where he edited the works of Pietro Pomponazzi for the