ANABAPTISM in MORAVIA and SILESIA Martin Rothkegel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANABAPTISM in MORAVIA and SILESIA Martin Rothkegel CHAPTER FIVE ANABAPTISM IN MORAVIA AND SILESIA Martin Rothkegel The period during which Moravia was considered as a “Promised Land” by the Anabaptists coincides approximately with the first cen- tury of Habsburg rule over the Lands of the Bohemian Crown, a heterogeneous political entity that consisted of the Kingdom of Bohemia, the Margraviate of Moravia, the Duchy of Upper and Lower Silesia along with the County of Glatz, and the Margraviates of Upper and Lower Lusatia. The spread of Anabaptism into Moravia began only a few weeks prior to the Battle of Mohács, during which Louis II Jagiello, the childless young king of Bohemia and Hungary, fell on the battlefield against the Turks on August 29, 1526. A few months later, the Austrian Archduke Ferdinand I of Habsburg suc- ceeded to the Bohemian throne and also assumed rule over of a part of Hungary. During the tenures of Ferdinand I and his successors, Moravia was caught in a permanent tension between the centralizing, abso- lutist tendencies of Habsburg politics and the “critical loyalty” of the Moravian lords, who persistently defended their liberties and privi- leges laid down in the traditional estate constitution. This tension— heightened from the late 16th century on by the religious antagonism between the Catholic overlords and the predominantly Protestant estates—culminated in the rebellion of the confederated estates of the Bohemian Lands in 1618–1620. In 1619 the estates accepted the Protestant Elector Frederick V of the Palatinate as Bohemian king instead of Ferdinand II, the Habsburg heir to the throne. Already in the next year, however, Habsburg troops defeated the estates in the Battle at the White Mountain near Prague on November 8, 1620. Two years later, all Anabaptists had to leave Moravia.1 1 For the history of the Bohemian Lands from 1526 to 1620, cf. Winkelbauer (2003), esp. 1: 79–104, 205–214; 2: 18–28, 63–67, 166–181; Bahlcke (1994); Vorel (2005); esp. on Moravia: Válka (1995); esp. on Silesia: Petry/Menzel (2000). 164 martin rothkegel The Anabaptists profited from the tolerant religious attitudes cher- ished by an influential fraction among the Moravian lords. Since the 15th century, Hussites and Catholics coexisted peacefully on the basis of a series of legal agreements guaranteed by the estates. These cir- cumstances led to the emergence of a “supra-denominational” ethos among the Moravian nobility. Since the early 16th century, many of them included within their protection members of the Unity of Brethren (or Bohemian Brethren) and other religious dissenters whose confession lacked formal legal recognition.2 Religious dissenters con- tinued to be tolerated on aristocratic domains and in towns and cities subject to nobles even in the face of persistent attempts by Ferdinand I to suppress the Anabaptist movements in all of his ter- ritories.3 Nevertheless, during his reign Ferdinand I pushed through three waves of persecution that either suppressed or impaired the development of various Anabaptist groups represented in Moravia. The persecution of 1528 brought an end to the further dissemina- tion of Anabaptism among the indigenous German-speaking popu- lation, especially in the larger cities. The persecution of 1535–1536 was directed against the communitarian Anabaptist immigrant com- munities; while the last major wave of repressive measures of 1547–1552 impacted especially the Hutterian Brethren. A number of Anabaptists were executed during these persecutions.4 Compared with the significant Anabaptist presence in Moravia, Anabaptism found very limited response in Bohemia, and that only temporarily and sporadically within the local German minority com- munities of Prague and in the centers of silver mining in south and north Bohemia.5 By contrast, a vigorous Anabaptist movement emerged between the late 1520s and the 1540s among the local population in parts of Silesia and in the County of Glatz. 2 Cf. Zeman (1973); Macek (2001), 385–416; Winkelbauer (2003), 2:148–156; Válka (2005), 229–260. 3 Cf. Packull (1995), 187–198; Kohler (2003), 188–192. 4 On the Anabaptist policies of Ferdinand I, cf. BL 1 (1877), 93, 268–270, 381, 385, 437, 611, 621; Kamení‘ek 3 (1905), 467–481; Hrubÿ (1935), 7–21.—Executions of Anabaptist preachers and lay people are documented for Brünn 1528: Loserth (1893), 217, QGT 5 (1951), 278, Zieglschmid (1943), 63f.; Znaim 1529: ETE 1 (1902): 425f., Zieglschmid (1943), 71f.; Brünn 1535: HE 2 (1987), 180–182, Zieglschmid (1943), 154f.; and Olmütz 1538: Dudík (1861), 9. 5 On Anabaptists in Bohemia, cf. ”imák (1907), 241–245; Wappler (1908), 183–186; HE 2 (1987), 189–194; Zieglschmid (1943), 162; Zeman (1969), 235f., 272; Loesche (1895), 77..
Recommended publications
  • The Population of Czechia and Slovakia in 1918–1945
    THE POPULATION OF CZECHIA AND SLOVAKIA IN 1918–1945 Ludmila Fialová1) – Branislav Šprocha2) Abstract During the interwar period the development of the population in Czechoslovakia reflected long-term reproductive trends (decreasing fertility and mortality) and the effects of contemporary political and economic developments. The populations of Czechia and Slovakia followed more or less similar paths of development, the difference being that fertility in Czechia tended to be lower than in Slovakia and the mortality conditions in Czechia were also better. Keywords: Czechia, Slovakia, population development, population structure, 20th century Demografie, 2018, 60: 161–183 1. INTRODUCTION of Hungary, also became part of the state, but since In the development of European populations during it ceased to be a part of Czechoslovakia from March the first half of the 20th century it is possible to 1939, the overview of population development in distinguish features that reflect both long-term Czechoslovakia presented below covers only the Czech tendencies in population reproduction over time lands3) and Slovakia.4) (the completion of the first demographic transition) Ever since the early modern era, Czechia had and the effects of specific political and economic belonged more to the western part of Central Europe. conditions – i.e. the two world wars and changing It was one of the most developed regions within former economic cycles. In Czechoslovakia an important Austria-Hungary and the structure of its domestic role in population development was also played by the economy reflected this, as less than half the population heterogeneity of the country. Although the new state of was dependent on agriculture for their livelihood and Czechoslovakia was formed entirely from territory that there was already a developed system of secondary was formerly a part of the Austro–Hungarian Empire, and higher education.
    [Show full text]
  • Century Historiography of the Radical Reformation
    Toward a Definition of Sixteenth - Century habaptism: Twentieth - Century Historiography of the Radical Reformation James R. Coggins Winnipeg "To define the essence is to shape it afresh." - Ernst Troeltsch Twentieth-century Anabaptist historiography has somewhat of the character of Hegelian philosophy, consisting of an already established Protestant-Marxist thesis, a Mennonite antithesis and a recent synthesis. The debate has centred on three major and related issues: geographic origin, intellectual sources, and essence. Complicating these issues has been confusion over the matter of categorization: Just who is to be included among the Anabaptists and who should be assigned to other groups? Indeed, what are the appropriate categories, or groups, in the sixteenth century? This paper will attempt to unravel some of the tangled debate that has gone on concerning these issues. The Protestant interpretation of Anabaptism has the longest aca- demic tradition, going back to the sixteenth century. Developed by such Protestant theologians and churchmen as Bullinger, Melanchthon, Men- ius, Rhegius and Luther who wrote works defining and attacking Ana- baptism, this interpretation arose out of the Protestant understanding of the church. Sixteenth-century Protestants believed in a single universal church corrupted by the Roman Catholic papacy but reformed by them- selves. Anyone claiming to be a Christian but not belonging to the church Joitnlal of Mennonite Stitdies Vol. 4,1986 184 Journal ofMennonite Studies (Catholic or Protestant) was classed as a heretic,' a member of the mis- cellaneous column of God's sixteenth-century army. For convenience all of these "others" were labelled "Anabaptists." Protestants saw the Anabaptists as originating in Saxony with Thomas Muntzer and the Zwickau prophets in 1521 and spreading in subsequent years to Switzerland and other parts of northern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Anabaptist Influences on World Christianity
    Anabaptist Influences on World Christianity Howard F. Shipps* The Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century had many sources. Some of these, like springs and streams leading toward a grand river, may be found several centuries before the time of Martin Luther. Such beginnings may be seen in the Cathari and the Walden- ses of the twelfth century. During the succeeding centuries of the late middle ages, similar movements of revolt and insistence upon purification of the established church continued to multiply and grow. More and more these new forces attracted the attention of all Europe. They arose in widely scattered geographical areas and represented various cultures and different levels of medieval society. There were the Christian mystics of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, Eckhart, Tauler, Suso, Merswin and the "Friends of God," seeking earnestly for life's greatest reality�the knowledge of God's presence in the soul of man. Likewise there were the Brethren of the Common Life of the fourteenth century, Groot, Ruysbroeck, Radewyn and a' Kempis, who were seeking to find God amidst the common ways of secular pursuits and by a daily practice of His Presence. During the same century, but across the English Channel, John Wy- cliffe was delivering the Word of God from the enslavement of tradi tion and the prison house of the so-called sacred Latin language, preaching and printing it in the tongue of the common man. He also made this living Word incarnate by committing it to men who would declare it throughout the by-ways of England. Thus for more than a century the Lollards carried the torch of truth which would urge the masses throughout England toward one of their greatest awakenings.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction Or Reformation the Conciliar Papacy and Jan Hus of Bohemia
    Garcia 1 RECONSTRUCTION OR REFORMATION THE CONCILIAR PAPACY AND JAN HUS OF BOHEMIA Franky Garcia HY 490 Dr. Andy Dunar 15 March 2012 Garcia 2 The declining institution of the Church quashed the Hussite Heresy through a radical self-reconstruction led by the conciliar reformers. The Roman Church of the late Middle Ages was in a state of decline after years of dealing with heresy. While the Papacy had grown in power through the Middle Ages, after it fought the crusades it lost its authority over the temporal leaders in Europe. Once there was no papal banner for troops to march behind to faraway lands, European rulers began fighting among themselves. This led to the Great Schism of 1378, in which different rulers in Europe elected different popes. Before the schism ended in 1417, there were three popes holding support from various European monarchs. Thus, when a new reform movement led by Jan Hus of Bohemia arose at the beginning of the fifteenth century, the declining Church was at odds over how to deal with it. The Church had been able to deal ecumenically (or in a religiously unified way) with reforms in the past, but its weakened state after the crusades made ecumenism too great a risk. Instead, the Church took a repressive approach to the situation. Bohemia was a land stained with a history of heresy, and to let Hus's reform go unchecked might allow for a heretical movement on a scale that surpassed even the Cathars of southern France. Therefore the Church, under guidance of Pope John XXIII and Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund of Luxemburg, convened in the Council of Constance in 1414.
    [Show full text]
  • Anabaptism in Historical Perspective
    EDITORIAL Anabaptism in Historical Perspective Kenneth Cain Kinghorn* Perhaps one of the most glaring injustices in ecclesiastical historiography has been the frequent failure to see the responsible and worthwhile elements in the dissenting movements within Prot estantism. The prevalent attitude toward Anabaptists may be regard ed as a classic illustration of this phenomenon. For centuries the Anabaptists have been lumped together with the irresponsible "spiri tualists" of the Reformation, the radical Anti-Trinitarians, and other fringe movements. Many church historians have seen only evil in any movement which has not been consistent with Wittenberg, Zurich or Geneva. The Anabaptists have frequently been regarded as only a negation of the gains of the Reformation. This attitude has tended to persist in a widespread way because of the paucity of writing on the Anabaptists by sympathetic schol 1 ars. However, since the mid-nineteenth century, this traditionally negative view has been greatly modified. (This changing mood is often seen as beginning with Max Gobel in his Geschichte des christleichn Lebens in der rheinisch-westfalischen. Kirche.) This leads one to a basic question as to the meaning of the term "Anabaptist." The late Harold S. Bender, a distinguished Anabap tist scholar, points out the difference between the original,evangel ical and constructive Anabaptist movement and the various mysti cal, spiritualistic, revolutionary, or even antinomian groups which have been concurrent. 2 The former is represented by the Mennonite and the latter maybe represented by such as the Schw'drmer, Thomas * Associate Professor of Church History, Asbury Theological Seminary. 1. See John Christian Wenger, Even Unto Death (Richmond: John Knox Press, 1961), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anabaptist Movement and Its Church Structure
    The Anabaptist Movement and Its Church Structure I. INTRODUCTION During the twentieth century churches in many mission fields started to ask serious questions about the church itself. It was a question for the identity as churches wrestling with issues of secularization and religious pluralism. The churches had to answer for their existence in their environments. Furthermore, many problems of the world raised questions concerning the churches’ role. Many debates on the issue of the role of the Church have been brought to public attention. Nowadays, new concerns for ecclesiology are coming out of basic communities in Latin America, house churches in China, indigenous churches in Asia and Africa,1 and the small church movements in America and Europe, and Catholic Church.2 With this concern for the church, the concern for the renewal of the church has become one of the burning issues in ecclesiology today. Many books have been written on this topic, most of which focus on the early church in the Bible as a model to which to 1 See further. Michel Bavarel, New Communities, New Ministries: The Church Resurgent in Asia, Africa, and Latin America (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1983); The Commission on Theological Concerns, Christian Conference of Asia, ed., Tradition and Innovation: A Search for Relevant Ecclesiology in Asia (Singapore:CTC-CCA, 1983); and H.S. Wilson and Nyambura J. Njoroge, New Wine: The Challenge of the Emerging Ecclesiologies to Church Renewal (Geneva: World Alliance of Reformed Churches, 1994). 2 Two exemplary books can be mentioned. Lode L. Wostyn, Doing Ecclesiology: Church and Mission Today (Quezon City, Philippines: Claretian Publications, 1990); and Walbert Buhlmann, The Church of the Future: A Model for the Year 2001 (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Rhizome Updates from the Institute for the Study of Global Anabaptism
    Rhizome Updates from the Institute for the Study of Global Anabaptism VOLUME 7, NUMBER 2 OCTOBER 2020 ISGA Publishes History of the Muria Javanese Mennonite Church in Indonesia Sigit Heru Sukoco Lawrence Yoder An upcoming book published translation by Lawrence M. their own cultural frame of by the ISGA, The Way of the Yoder, with extensive editing reference. Over the course of Gospel in the World of Java: A by ISGA director, John D. its long history, the developing History of the Muria Javanese Roth. communities of Christians Mennonite Church (GITJ), tells joined to form a community The Way of the Gospel in the the story of one branch of known as Gereja Injili di World of Java gives an account the Anabaptist-Mennonite Tanah Jawa (GITJ), or the Mu- of how missionaries of the INSIDE THIS churches in Indonesia. Au- ria Javanese Mennonite Dutch Mennonite Mission, ISSUE: thors Sigit Heru Sukoco and Church. along with indigenous Java- Lawrence M. Yoder originally Research Sym- 1 nese evangelists, sought to One of the indigenous found- posium wrote and published this his- evangelize the people of the ers of the Christian move- Project Updates 2 tory of the Muria Javanese Muria region of north Central ment in the Muria area was a Mennonite Church—known Visiting Scholar 2 Java starting in the 1850s. Javanese mystic, who took the in Indonesia as Gereja Injili di GAMEO 3 While European missionaries name Ibrahim Tunggul Tanah Jawa (GITJ)—in 2010 Editorial 4 functioned out of a western Wulung. This portrait, com- with the title Tata Injil di Bumi cultural framework, the Java- missioned by Lawrence Yoder, Muria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Early Anabaptism As Minority Religion in German Fiction
    Heresy or Ideal Society? A Study of Early Anabaptism as Minority Religion in German Fiction DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ursula Berit Jany Graduate Program in Germanic Languages and Literatures The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Professor Barbara Becker-Cantarino, Advisor Professor Katra A. Byram Professor Anna Grotans Copyright by Ursula Berit Jany 2013 Abstract Anabaptism, a radical reform movement originating during the sixteenth-century European Reformation, sought to attain discipleship to Christ by a separation from the religious and worldly powers of early modern society. In my critical reading of the movement’s representations in German fiction dating from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, I explore how authors have fictionalized the religious minority, its commitment to particular theological and ethical aspects, its separation from society, and its experience of persecution. As part of my analysis, I trace the early historical development of the group and take inventory of its chief characteristics to observe which of these aspects are selected for portrayal in fictional texts. Within this research framework, my study investigates which social and religious principles drawn from historical accounts and sources influence the minority’s image as an ideal society, on the one hand, and its stigmatization as a heretical and seditious sect, on the other. As a result of this analysis, my study reveals authors’ underlying programmatic aims and ideological convictions cloaked by their literary articulations of conflict-laden encounters between society and the religious minority.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbols of Czech and Slovak Political Parties After the “Velvet Revolution”
    Symbols of Czech and Slovak Political PROCEEDINGS Parties After the “Velvet Revolution” Aleš Brozˇek Communist totalitarianism did not tolerate the existence of political parties, nor of any independent organizations between the state and the family. The situation in Czecho- slovakia fortunately was not as severe as in the Soviet Union. Czech and Slovak citizens could join a limited number of organisations and associations which mainly used emblems, although some of them had flags. The Vexillology Club researched them in 1977 and published a report on them in its periodical in 19781. No article has yet appeared on the symbols of Czech and Slovak political parties, although such an article should be of interest not only to Czech vexillologists, but to others too. Fig. 1 After the Communist putsch of February 1948, apart from the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia four other Some members of the Czechoslovak Socialist Party, the parties were tolerated, the Czechoslovak Socialist Party, Czechoslovak People’s Party and the Communist Party the Czechoslovak People’s Party, the Democratic Party were instrumental in the rise of the Czech Civic Forum, and the Liberation Party. However they had to give up but their secretariats maintained their own policy and their own programs, accept that of the Communist Party did not cooperate with the Civic Forum. They continued and that of the National Front, and to recognise the to use their own emblems, which in some cases were so-called “leading role” of the Communist Party. The completely and in others only slightly changed in the November 1989 revolution meant the end of the one- following years.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I the Beginnings
    Part I The Beginnings 1 The Problem of Heresy Heresy, and the horror it inspires, intertwines with the history of the Church itself. Jesus warned his disciples against the false prophets who would take His name and the Epistle to Titus states that a heretic, after a first and second abomination, must be rejected. But Paul, writing to the Corinthians, said, `Oportet esse haereses', as the Latin Vulgate translated his phrase ± `there must be heresies, that they which are proved may be manifest among you'1 ± and it was understood by medieval churchmen that they must expect to be afflicted by heresies. Heresy was of great importance in the early centuries in forcing the Church progressively to define its doctrines and to anathematize deviant theological opinions. At times, in the great movements such as Arianism and Gnosticism, heresy seemed to overshadow the Church altogether. Knowledge of the individ- ual heresies and of the definitions which condemned them became a part of the equipment of the learned Christian; the writings of the Fathers wrestled with these deviations, and lists of heresies and handbooks assimilated this experience of the early centuries and handed it on to the Middle Ages. Events after Christianity became the official religion of the Empire also shaped the assumptions with which the Church of the Middle Ages met heresy. After Constantine's conversion, Christians in effect held the power of the State and, despite some hesitations, they used it to impose a uniformity of belief. Both in the eastern and in the western portions of the Empire it became the law that pertinacious heretics were subject to the punishments of exile, branding, confis- cation of goods, or death.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of SLOVAKIA Small State with Rich History Samova Ríša- Samo‘S Empire
    HISTORY OF SLOVAKIA Small state with rich history Samova ríša- Samo‘s empire • Ancestors of Slovaks were Slavs. Their homeland was between the rivers Visla and Dneper, north of the mountains Karpaty. In 5th and 6th century they moved to another place. Some of them stayed on our territory.They nurtured the peasantry, beekeeping, handicrafts. • In 6th century Avars (nomadic tribes from Asia) came and they settled on the territory of today's Hungary. From there, they were attacking the neighbouring Slavonic nations. Slavs united in the 7th century to defend themselves against aggressive Avars. - in the fight Frankish merchant Samo helped them and with his help they won - Slavonic tribes created a tribal union- Samo‘s empire - it existed in years 623-658 Veľká Morava-Great Moravia • NITRA PRINCIPALITY - Slavs slowly started to build strong forts (Bojná, Pobedim) - the most important fort was in Nitra, it was the seat of the prince - first known prince was Pribina - in the west, there was Moravian principality, with the seat in Mikulčice, prince Mojmír ruled there - year 833- Mojmír I. expelled Pribina and occupied Nitra principality - by the combination of the two principalities Great Moravia originated • GREAT MORAVIA - GM resulted in conflicts with the Frankish Empire, Franks wanted to control GM - Mojmír I. didn‘t want to subordinate to Franks, so they deprived him of power and he was replaced by Rastislav. He invited Thessalonian brothers- Konštantín and Metod - Svätopluk betrayed Rastislav and issued him to Franks - when Svätopluk died,
    [Show full text]
  • Not Quite Calvinist: Cyril Lucaris a Reconsideration of His Life and Beliefs
    College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU School of Theology and Seminary Graduate Papers/Theses School of Theology and Seminary 3-13-2018 Not Quite Calvinist: Cyril Lucaris a Reconsideration of His Life and Beliefs Stephanie Falkowski College of Saint Benedict/Saint John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/sot_papers Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Falkowski, Stephanie, "Not Quite Calvinist: Cyril Lucaris a Reconsideration of His Life and Beliefs" (2018). School of Theology and Seminary Graduate Papers/Theses. 1916. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/sot_papers/1916 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Theology and Seminary at DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Theology and Seminary Graduate Papers/Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOT QUITE CALVINIST: CYRIL LUCARIS A RECONSIDERATION OF HIS LIFE AND BELIEFS by Stephanie Falkowski 814 N. 11 Street Virginia, Minnesota A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Seminary of Saint John’s University, Collegeville, Minnesota, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Theology. SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AND SEMINARY Saint John’s University Collegeville, Minnesota March 13, 2018 This thesis was written under the direction of ________________________________________ Dr. Shawn Colberg Director _________________________________________ Dr. Charles Bobertz Second Reader Stephanie Falkowski has successfully demonstrated the use of Greek and Latin in this thesis.
    [Show full text]