Midwestern Journal of Theology 11.2 (2012): 54-87 Anabaptism and James Arminius: A Study in Soteriological Kinship and Its Implications 1 JERRY SUTTON Academic Dean Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary Kansas City, MO 64118
[email protected] As research progresses many links are being discovered between English General Baptists as they emerged in the seventeenth century, and Continental Anabaptistism, particularly the Mennonites. The factuality of relationships of John Smyth, Thomas Helwys and others with the Dutch Mennonites are incontestable. Irvin Horst has done much spade-work to establish the presence and identity of Anabaptists in England during the Reformation era on the other side of the English Channel. 2 Nonetheless many scholars and particularly British scholars contend that the rise of the English Baptists was essentially independent from any Anabaptist influence. If anything, the theology of the English General Baptists-the most probable link to Anabaptists by either of the two ear ly branches-was molded not by the European Radical Reformation but 1 This article is based on research conducted by Dr. Sutton while studying with William R. Estep, noted Baptist historian of the Reformation and Anabap tist movements. 2 Tom Nettles, "Smyth and Helwys: The Key to Anabaptist-Baptist Rela tions," Southwestern Journal of Theology 19 (Fall 1976) :101-104; W.R. Estep, "On the Origin of the English Baptists," Southwestern Baptist Theological Sem inary, Fort Worth, TX, 1979 (mimeographed); Irvin B. Horst, The Radical Brethren (Nieuwkoop: B. De Graaf, 1972). SUTTON: Soteriological Kinship 55 rather by the Magisterial Reform referring to the Dutch theologian, James Arminius. Much evidence exists to support the contention that the English General Baptists were Arminian with respect to their theology.