Geology of the Bedford Shale and Berea Sandstone in the Appalachian Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of the Bedford Shale and Berea Sandstone in the Appalachian Basin Geology of the Bedford Shale and Berea Sandstone in the Appalachian Basin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 259 Geology of the Bedford Shale and Berea Sandstone in the Appalachian Basin By JAMES F. PEPPER, WALLACE DE WITT, JR., and DAVID F. DEMAREST GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 259 A study of the stratigraphy, sedimentation and paleogeography of rocks of Bedford and Berea age in Ohio and adjacent States UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $4.25 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-_ _________________________________________ 1 Correlations and stratigraphy — Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 2 Mississippian rocks — Continued Purpose of the study____________________________ 2 Corry sandstone. ___________________________ 40 Acknowledgments. ______________________________ 3 Shellhammer Hollow formation. ______________ 41 Character and extent of the Berea sandstone.______ 5 Sunbury shale______________________________ 41 Method of investigation. ________________________ 7 South of Sunbury, Ohio, to Irvine, Ky____ 41 Well records ___________________________________ 7 North of Sunbury, Ohio, to the vicinity of A description of some of the more common terms Berea, Ohio______-____---__---__-___- 41 used by the oil- and gas-well drillers in the Appa­ From Berea, Ohio, eastward ___ _________ 41 lachian basin_ ________________________________ Orangeville shale. __________________________ 42 Sand._____________________________________ Aurora siltstone member ___ ____ ______ 42 Settling sand_______________________________ Chardon siltstone member. ______________ 42 Lime_ _ ____________________________________ Bartholomew siltstone member.. __________ 42 Hungry Run sandstone member __________ 43 Shells, shale and shells, slate and shells, sand Sharpsville sandstone— ______________________ 45 shells, or lime shells.______________________ Sedimentation _ ___________________________________ 45 Cave, pencil cave, and mules ear cave_________ Bedford sedimentation __________________________ 45 Red rock __________________________________ Red Bedford Delta ___ _____________________ 45 Coffee shale._______________________________ General features________________________ 45 Historical summary of the stratigraphic nomen­ Fluvial origm__________________________ 46 clature ______________________________________ 11 Evidence. _________________________ 46 The age relation of the Bedford shale and Berea Hypotheses of environments of deposi­ sandstone_ _________________________________ 13 tion. _ _ _________________ 48 Correlations and stratigraphy._______________________ 13 Coastal-plain hypothesis.. _______ 48 Upper Devonian rocks___________________________ 13 River- valley-alluvium hypothesis. 49 Ohio shale _________________________________ 14 Delta hypothesis ___ ___________ 50 Huron member_________________________ 15 History of the Red Bedford Delta. _______ 53 Cleveland member._____________________ 16 Delineation of the outline — early Bed­ Chattanooga shale__________________________ 16 ford time_-__________-__-________ 54 Chagrin shale ______________________________ 17 Delineation of the outline — bar forma­ Riceville shale______________________________ 17 tion. _ ___________________________ 54 Mississippian rocks_____________________________ 17 Subaerial sedimentation _____________ 56 Uplift and erosion in the north, subsid­ Surface correlations.________________________ 17 ence in the south_________________ 57 Subsurface correlations ______________________ 19 The color of the Red Bedford Delta sedi­ Cussewago sandstone______________________ 19 ments _______________________________ 57 General features._______________________ 19 Relation of the Cussewago sandstone to Deposition of the gray Bedford shale. _________ 58 Sedimentation of the Cussewago (Murrysville) sand- Caster's Cobham conglomerate member 59 of the Knapp formation_______________ 21 Sedimentation of Cussewago (Murrysville) equiv­ Subsurface features (Murrysville sand)____ 21 alent in northern West Virginia (area F) _________ 61 Bedford shale_ _____________________________ 21 Sedimentation of the Berea sandstone _____________ 61 Exposures west and south of Berea, Ohio__ 21 Sedimentation in Kentucky during Bedford and Exposures east of Berea, Ohio____________ 23 Berea time___________________---_-__-____ 74 Correlation of the Bedford shale._________ 23 Sedimentation of the West Virginia type Berea Subsurface. ____________________________ 25 sand in area N_ __________________________ 74 Berea sandstone ____________________________ 28 Gay-Fink Channel _ _________ _ _______ __ 75 Exposures west and south of Berea, Ohio_. 28 Cabin Creek Channel____________-_____--_-_ 78 Exposures east of Berea, Ohio.___________ 32 Minor sedimentary features in the Berea sand­ Subsurface_____________________________ 34 stone _ __________________________________ 79 Relationship of Berea sand and Cusse­ Ripple marks____--_____-_-----_-------- 79 wago (Murrysville) sand in eastern Flow rolls __ __ _ _____________________ 88 Ohio and western Pennsylvania.___ 34 Sun cracks__________ ___________________ 89 Correlation of the Berea sand of south­ Carbonaceous material in the Berea sand- ern Ohio, West Virginia, and Ken­ 90 tucky ___________________________ 36 Sedimentation of the Sunbury shale. __ 91 Correlation of Berea and Corry sandstones_____ 39 Petrographic studies of the Berea sand 91 in IV CONTENTS Page Page Paleogeography__ _ _ _______________________________ 95 Paleogeography—Continued Paleogeography of Bedford and Berea time_ _______ 95 The paleogeographic map of Bedford and Berea The Appalachian basin ______________________ 95 time—Continued Cincinnati arch_____________________________ 97 Paleogeography at the beginning of late Bedford Climate of Bedford and Berea time._________ _ 99 time-________-_____________-_- ——— _____ 103 Source of the sediments of the Bedford and Berea Paleogeography at the end of late Bedford time, _ 103 deposited in Michigan and Ohio. _______________ 99 Paleogeography of early Berea time___________ 104 Paleogeography of middle Berea time _________ 105 The paleogeographic map of Bedford and Berea Paleogeography of late Berea time,___________ 105 ime ________________________________________ Paleogeography of latest Berea time_________ 106 Paleogeography at the beginning of early Bedford Paleogeography of Sunbury time _ _ ___ _ ___ 107 time___________________________________._ 101 Literature cited___-_____________________-_____-_____ 107 Paleogeography of early Bedford time_________ 102 Index.____________________________________________ 111 ILLUSTRATIONS [Pis. 1-12,14 in pocket; pi. 13,4.-/follows p. 106] PLATE 1. Map showing extent and thickness of the Berea, Cussewago (Murrysville), and Corry sands in the Appalachian basin. 2. Map of the Second Berea sand in Gallia, Meigs, Athens, Morgan, and Muskingum Counties, Ohio. 3. Schematic cross section showing the generalized relation of the Berea sandstone to the adjacent formations. 4. Outcrop map of the Berea sandstone and the Bartholomew siltstone member in the base of the Orangeville shale. 5. Stratigraphic sections from Squaw Rock, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, to Spartansburg, Crawford County, Pa. 6. Map of part of area in northern Ohio showing the major trends of some channel sandstones of the Berea. 7. Map of the Red Bedford Delta showing extent and thickness of the red beds. 8. Map and cross section of part of the channeled area in Knox, Holmes, and Coshocton Counties, Ohio, which contains sand of Bedford and Berea age. 9. Diagram showing the position of the channel sands of Bedford age in parts of Medina, Ashland, Wayne, Holmes, Knox, and Coshocton Counties, Ohio. 10. Map and cross sections showing relationship of Berea sand to associated formations as interpreted from drill holes. 11. Map showing the distribution of the several types of Berea sand in West Virginia, eastern Ohio, and western Pennsylvania. 12. A paleogeographic map of northeastern North America in middle Berea time. 13. Paleogeographic maps. A, Beginning of early Bedford time. B, Early Bedford time. C, Beginning of late Bedford time. D, End of late Bedford time. E, Early Berea time. F, Middle Berea time. G, Late Berea time. H, Latest Berea time. /, Sunbury time. 14. Subsurface cross section showing the relative stratigraphic position of the 2d Gas, Berea, and Cussewago (Murrysville) sands. Page FIGURE 1. Sketch map showing the northern part of the Appalachian basin of the oil and gas geologist__-__------__-__-_ 2 2. Representative sections of the lower Mississippian and Upper Devonian rocks in the area mapped_____________ 4 3. Sketch map showing the parts of the outcrop of the Bedford shale and Berea sandstone mapped by different geologists ________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 4. Chart showing the stratigraphic names which have been applied to some of the Upper Devonian and lower Mis­ sissippian rocks in Ohio____________________________________________________________________________ 10 5. Sketch map showing lithologic character of the Upper Devonian rocks upon which the Bedford and Berea sedi­ ments were deposited_____________________________________________________________________________ 11 6. Schematic cross section between Buena Vista
Recommended publications
  • FISHING for DUNKLEOSTEUS You’Re Definitely Gonna Need a Bigger Boat by Mark Peter
    OOhhiioo GGeeoollooggyy EEXXTTRRAA July 31, 2019 FISHING FOR DUNKLEOSTEUS You’re definitely gonna need a bigger boat by Mark Peter At an estimated maximum length of 6 to 8.8 meters (20–29 sediments that eroded from the Acadian Mountains, combined feet), Dunkleosteus terrelli (Fig. 1) would have been a match for with abundant organic matter from newly evolved land plants even the Hollywood-sized great white shark from the and marine plankton, settled in the basin as dark organic movie Jaws. Surfers, scuba divers, and swimmers can relax, muds. Over millions of years, accumulation of additional however, because Dunkleosteus has been extinct for nearly 360 overlying sediments compacted the muds into black shale rock. million years. Dunkleosteus was a placoderm, a type of armored The rocks that formed from the Late Devonian seafloor fish, that lived during the Late Devonian Period from about sediments (along with fossils of Dunkleosteus) arrived at their 375–359 million years ago. Fossil remains of the large present location of 41 degrees north latitude after several species Dunkleosteus terrelli are present in the Cleveland hundred million years of slow plate tectonic movement as the Member of the Ohio Shale, which contains rocks that are North American Plate moved northward. approximately 360–359 million years old. Figure 1. A reconstruction of a fully-grown Dunkleosteus terrelli, assuming a length of 29 feet, with angler for scale. Modified from illustration by Hugo Salais of Metazoa Studio. Dunkleosteus cruised Late Devonian seas and oceans as an Figure 2. Paleogeographic reconstruction of eastern North America during apex predator, much like the great white shark of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Natural History
    CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY —THE WILDERNESS THAT GREETED THE FIRST SETTLERS The land one sees today traveling through northern Ohio took gone. Thus, some 14,000 years ago as the last glacier receded millions of years to form. We can see evidence of tropical sea into the Lake Erie basin, the first Native Americans arrived and reefs on the Lake Erie Islands and deep ocean sediments here in began to utilize the natural resources that these natural processes the cliffs of the Black River. Ohio was just south of the equator had produced. at that time, some 350 million years ago, and over the millennia The natural history of Sheffield encompasses all those natural has migrated northward to its present position. Mountain features and processes of the environment that greeted the Native building to the east eventually raised the sea floor from under Americans, and later the pioneers, when they first arrived in the waves and erosion by streams, and later glacial ice, began Sheffield. To be sure, the landscape was a magnificent wilderness to sculpture the land. At the same time plants and animals were to the settlers, but it needed to be “tamed” in order to support evolving and began to populate the new land once the ice was the newcomers. Ice formation on the shale bluff of the Black River north of Garfield Bridge (2005). 1 BICENTENNIAL HISTORY OF SHEFFIELD TOPOGRAPHY Regional Physiography The topography of an area is the configuration of the land Physiography refers to the physical features or landforms of surface, including its relief [vertical differences in elevation of a region.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Digital Version of the Pathfinder Powered By
    Powered by Table of Contents Click or touch a section below to access it directly. The home button in the 3 Message from upper left will return you here. Executive Leadership Cleveland Metroparks - 4 By the Numbers 5 Legend 6 Acacia Reservation 7 Bedford Reservation 9 Big Creek Reservation 10 Bradley Woods Reservation 11 Brecksville Reservation 13 Brookside Reservation 14 Cleveland Metroparks Zoo 15 Euclid Creek Reservation 16 Garf ield Park Reservation 17 Hinckley Reservation 18 Huntington Reservation 19 Lakefront Reservation 21 Mill Stream Run Reservation 23 North Chagrin Reservation 24 Ohio & Erie Canal Reservation 25 Rocky River Reservation 27 South Chagrin Reservation 28 Washington Reservation 29 West Creek Reservation 30 Activities by Park 31 Find Your Course 32 Be a Trailblazer / Directory Message from Executive Leadership Cleveland Metroparks now more than ever, serves as a resource for everyone in our community to f ind peace and comfort, as well as strength and restoration. The park district serves 48 diverse communities across Northeast Ohio. The dedication and hard work of Cleveland Metroparks employees is what makes the park district among the best in the nation. It is our goal to have a workforce that’s as diverse as the communities we serve. Building connections into the community is and will always be a top priority. However, the theme of connections goes beyond geography. Over time, Cleveland Metroparks has built a community of park-goers and we are all joined together by our shared love of nature. The park district’s 18 reservations, eight golf courses and nationally-acclaimed Zoo exist for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Hike #4 Wildwood Park Fall Wetland Cleanup
    Euclid Creek August / September News & Summer Newsletter Please find the Euclid Creek Summer Newsletter by clicking here. This edition covers the following: Day in the Life of Euclid Creek Recap Upcoming Events & Meetings Friends of Euclid Creek Updates: - President's Message - Watershed Wildlife - Scholarship Announced - 15 Year Anniversary Upcoming Events Acacia Reservation Restoration Starting this Fall Urban Ravines: a means to regenerate local ecology Watershed Action Plan Update Illegal Dumping, a Continuous Problem in Watershed Euclid Creek Watershed Summit Announcement Featured Events FOEC Fifteen Miles with Friends - Hike #4 Anniversary hike at Let's continue the 15th anniversary celebration of Friends of Euclid Creek. Join us Acacia for the fourth hike in our series of Fifteen Miles with Friends. We will hike one and a Reservation half miles in the Euclid Creek Reservation- Wildwood Park in Cleveland. After on August completing this hike you will have reached the 3/4 point in your 15 miles! 2, Hike #3 When: September 6, at 6:30-8:00pm Where: Wildwood Park, Euclid Creek Reservation, Cleveland - park entrance at E. 174th Street and Lakeshore Blvd., 44110 Who: The hike will be led by Chris Vild, Vice President of FOEC. Hike difficulty: Flat to moderately rolling portions, slow pace; mostly paved with some creek/wetland edge walking. Parking: Park/meet up at the Wildwood Picnic Shelter. Come out and see the restoration project three years after project completion and all of the wildlife enjoying the native habitat. Please contact Ken Rapport at 216-287-8693 with additional questions. To see details about our last two scheduled hikes, click here.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of Northeastern Ohio
    SDMS US EPA REGION V -1 SOME IMAGES WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE ILLEGIBLE DUE TO BAD SOURCE DOCUMENTS. GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY of NORTHEASTERN OHIO Edited by P. O. BANKS & RODNEY M. FELDMANN 1970 Northern Ohio Geological Society ELYP.i.A PU&UC LIBRARt as, BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM MISSISSIPPIAN SYSTEM DEVONIAN SYSTEM \V&fe'£:i£:VS:#: CANTON viSlSWSSWM FIGURr I Geologic map of northeastern Ohio. Individual formations within each time unit are not dis- -guished, and glacial deposits have been omitted. Because the bedding planes are nearly ••.crizontal, the map patterns of the contacts closely resemble the topographic contours at those z evations. The older and deeper units are most extensively exposed where the major rivers rave cut into them, while the younger units are preserved in the intervening higher areas. CO «< in Dev. Mississippian r-c Penn. a> 3 CO CD BRADF. KINOERHOOK MERAMEC —1 OSAGE CHESTER POTTSVIUE ro to r-» c-> e-> e= e-i GO n « -n V) CO V* o ^_ ^ 0. = -^ eo CO 3 c= « ^> <C3 at ta B> ^ °» eu ra to a O9 eo ^ a* s 1= ca \ *** CO ^ CO to CM v» o' CO to CO 3 =3 13- *•» \ ¥\ A. FIGURE 1. Columnar section ol the major stratigraphic units in northeastern Ohio showing their relative positions in the standard geologic time scale. The Devonian-Mississippian boundary is not known with certainty to lie within the Cleveland Shale. The base of the Mississippian in the northern part of the state is transitional with the Bradford Series of the Devonian System and may lie within the Cleveland Shale (Weller er a/., 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, State Geologist and Di v ision Chief David K. Webb, Jr., Geologist and Assistant Chief Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary Jean S. Brown, Geologist and Editor Pauline Smyth, Geologist Betty B. Baber, Geologist REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, Geologist and Section Head William J. Buschman, Jr., Geologist and Section Head Richard M. Delong, Geologist Michael J. Clifford, Geologist G. William Kalb, Geochemist Adriaan J anssens, Geologist Douglas L. Kohout, Geologis t Frederick B. Safford, Geologist David A. Stith, Geologist Jam es Wooten, Geologist Aide Joel D. Vormelker, Geologist Aide Barbara J. Adams, Clerk· Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk PUBLICATIONS SECTION LAKE ERIE SECTION Harold J. Fl inc, Cartographer and Section Head Charles E. Herdendorf, Geologist and Sectwn Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Lawrence L. Braidech, Geologist Donald R. Camburn, Cartovapher Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Philip J. Celnar, Cartographer David B. Gruet, Geologist Aide Jean J. Miller, Photocopy Composer Jean R. Ludwig, Clerk- Typist STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 GEOLOGY SERVES OHIO CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 Previous investigations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Study methods . 4 Detroit River Group . .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 6 Sylvania Sandstone ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Geoloaic District. Subsequent Stratigraphic Studies in This Area
    DEVONIAN STRATA AND PALEOENVIRONMENTS: CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY REGION: NEW YORK STATE GORDON C. BAIRD and GARY G. LASH Department of Geosciences State University of New York College at Fredonia Fredonia, New York 14063 INTRODUCTION The history of the study of the Paleozoic stratigraphic divisions in New York State spans, at least, two centuries, and it records the early development of important concepts centrally germane to the study of sedimentary basins worldwide (see Tesmer, 1989). The works of James Hall, John Clarke, HenryS. Williams, Joseph Barrell, and George Chadwick are well known to most sedimentary workers, as are those of numerous subsequent workers. In particular, the sedimentary sequences of the Allegheny Plateau Region (••southern Tier" region) served as important sources of information for refinement of the fac ies concept ar.d for the widespread recognition of the westwardly prograding Catskill Delta Complex which is the primary Paleozoic story recorded in Southern Tier bedrock deposits (see Chadwick, 1924, 1933; Cooper, et al., 1942; Caster, 1934; Woodrow, 1985). ---- The first significant geologic work relating to the Chautauqua County region was presented in James Hall's (1843) Survey of the Fourth Geoloaic District. Subsequent stratigraphic studies in this area inclu e Clarke (1903), Chadwick (1923, 1924), Caster (1934), Pepper and de Witt (1950, 1951) and de Witt and Colton (1953). In northwest Pennsylvania, significant synthetic contributions include I.C. White (1881), Butts (1906-1908), Chadwick (1925), Caster ·(1934), Pepper et al. (1954). In Ohio, deposits equivalent to parts of the New York and -­ Pennsylvania Upper Devonian section (Chagrin Shale) have been the subject of recent paleoenvironmental studies (see Weidner and Feldmann, 1983; Schwimmer and Feldmann, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC SUMMARY of the APPALACHIAN BASIN, with REFERENCE to the SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL of RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS by George W
    TEI-791 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY" GEOLOGIC SUMMARY OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN, WITH;REFERENCE TO THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS* By George W. Colton June 1961 Report TEI-791 This report is preliminary and ha^;not been edited for conformity with G^logical Survey format and nomenclature. ?1 ^Prepared on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. CONTENTS Abstract* .......................... 5 Introduction. ........................ 7 Purpose of report. ................... 7 Organization of report .................. 7 Location and extent of area. .............. Q Acknowledgments. .................... 10 Geologic framework. ..................... 10 Depositional framework ................. 10 Structural framework .................. llj. Stratigraphy. ........................ 17 Late Precambrian stratified sequence .......... 17 Early Cambrian clastic sequence. ............ 18 Thickness and depth ................ 22 Cambrian-Ordovician carbonate sequence ......... 23 Thickness and depth . , ........... 35 Late Ordovician clastic sequence ............ 35 Thickness and depth ................ Mi- Early Silurian clastic sequence. ............ kk Thickness and depth ................ 51 Silurian-Devonian carbonate sequence .......... 52 Thickness and depth ................ 62 Devonian classic sequence. ............... 63 Thickness and depth ................ 69 Mississippian sequence ................. 70 Thickness and depth ................ 79 Pennsylvanian sequence ................. 79 Waste
    [Show full text]