DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Physics and Astronomy DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY PHY326 Dark Matter and the Universe (please note was PHY323 for 13/14) ​ PHY426 Autumn 10 Credits Staff contact Prof Neil Spooner ­ [email protected] ­ 0114 222 4422 ​ ​ Outline The topic of Dark Matter in the Universe is arguably the most exciting and important area in physics Description and cosmology at the current time. It concerns one of the biggest mysteries in science, that the vast majority of the Universe is not normal baryonic matter but is something much stranger, something non­luminous and as yet of unknown form. The journey that scientists are undertaking now to understand this problem is already leading to new fundamental physics and is revolutionizing our understanding of the Universe. This course will explore the topic in detail. It will explain the overwhelming observational evidence for the existence of the so­called Dark Matter and Dark energy, explore what scientists believe it is most likely to be and study what is happening in the world­wide race to confirm the most likely explanation, that it is new fundamental particles from the Big Bang. Dark Matter determines our very existence, it holds galaxies together, makes life possible and is crucial to the eventual fate of our Universe. No topic in physics covers such a range of scale, from the smallest particle to the structure of the whole Universe, or holds such importance to our understanding of nature. To do this justice the course has a highly multidisciplinary flavour, combining work in astronomy, particle physics, solid state physics, detector technology and philosophy, encouraging development of skills in all these. Restrictions None Prerequisites First and Second Year Physics or Astronomy. Co requisites None Approx Time Lectures ­ 18, Revision Lecture ­ 1, Independent ­ 80, Examination ­ 2 allocation (hours) Assessment (%) PHY326 Examination ­ 85, Class Test ­ 15% PHY426 Examination ­ 75, Class Test ­ 15%, Written Report ­ 10% Aims The aims of this module are: To examine our current understanding of the structure of the Universe and how this leads to the mystery that greater than 95% of the Universe is in the form of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. To examine the observational and theoretical evidence for the existence of large amounts of Dark Matter in the Universe on all scales reaching from the Solar System to clusters of galaxies and beyond. To study the possible candidates for what the Dark Matter might be, including both baryonic and non­baryonic possibilities. To explore some of the latest experimental techniques being used in the laboratory to hunt for Dark Matter particles and discuss the latest results in this quest for new physics. PHY326 / PHY426 2015­16 1 DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY Outcomes 1. For students to gain a broad understanding of the arguments from cosmology and astronomical ​ observation that lead to the notion that the Universe is filled with dark matter and dark energy 2. To have understanding of the possible candidates to explain the dark matter including the possible ​ existence of new particles such as WIMPs and axions 3. To understand the basic particle physics concepts relevant to the interactions of dark matter with ​ normal baryonic matter 4. To have knowledge of some of the technology being developed to detect dark matter in the ​ laboratory and the latest results from experiments world­wide 5. To have an appreciation of dark energy and how together with dark matter this determines the ​ ultimate fate of the Universe Recommended The Cosmic Cocktail ­ Three Parts Dark Matter Books by Katherine Freese, Princeton University Press, 2014, ISBN 978­0­691­15335­3 Syllabus The course will be divided into short topics covering the following themes: Topic 1: Dark Matter, Dark Energy and the Cosmology Revolution ​ ​ What is the real structure of our Universe and how do we know it is so? Introduction to the structure of our Universe, including observations of galaxy clusters, the Big Bang and the cosmic microwave background. A review of the basic tools used in cosmology, including the critical density and density parameter. An introduction to the dark matter mystery. Topic 2: Dark Matter Observation Nearby and in Galaxies Why don’t galaxies fly apart and how does this tell us dark matter exists? Galactic dynamics and galactic halos as relevant to understanding the origin of the dark matter problem. Oort observations, modified gravity and the isothermal sphere model of galaxies. Rotation curves of galaxies and the evidence for dark matter from these. Topic 3: Dark Matter in Galaxy Clusters and Superclusters How does Einstein’s bending of light reveal the true picture of our Universe? Gravitational lensing and the evidence for dark matter that this brings from strong lensing and weak lensing. The evidence for dark matter from application of the virial theorem to clusters. Dark matter observations from large scale flows and x­ray gas. Topic 4: Hunting for Baryonic Dark Matter Black holes, dead stars, neutrinos & the primordial soup ­ why is the dark matter not ordinary ​ matter we can not see? The hunt for baryonic dark matter including Brown Dwarfs, Massive Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs), other candidates and the use of gravitational microlensing to search for them. Primordial nucleosynthesis bounds on the abundance of baryonic matter and from observation of microwave background radiation. Neutrinos and the death of baryonic dark matter. Topic 5: Cold Dark Matter and the Exotic non­Baryonic Particle Zoo From the Higgs Boson and Antimatter to WIMPs and Axions ­ why is the dark matter likely to ​ ​ be exotic new particles from the Big Bang? Particle physics discoveries, neutrinos as dark matter and introduction to non­baryonic particle dark matter candidates. Hot, cold and warm particle dark matter and their influence on structure formation in the Universe. Cold dark matter candidates and introduction to Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) and axions as the best motivated candidates. PHY326 / PHY426 2015­16 2 DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY Topic 6: Detecting Dark Matter Particles, Signals and Discoveries Why do WIMPs or axions most likely form the dark matter and how can they be detected? Dark Matter WIMP and axion interactions with matter. The properties of axions and how to detect them with resonant cavity detectors. The physics of WIMPs and the latest technologies used to search for them, including ionisation, scintillation and low temperature techniques. Results, possible signals and consequences. Topic 7: Dark Energy and the Fate of the Universe What is dark energy and how does it overcome dark matter to determine our fate? Dark energy and the evidence for it from supernova and the cosmic microwave background. Dark matter, dark energy and the fate of the Universe. Topic 8: Conclusion and Course Revision Academic Notes The Level 3 version of Dark Matter and the Universe can only be studied in Level 3. ​ The Level 4 version of Dark Matter and the Universe can only be studied in Level 4. ​ PHY326 / PHY426 2015­16 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parallel Sessions
    Identification of Dark Matter July 23-27, 2012 9th International Conference Chicago, IL http://kicp-workshops.uchicago.edu/IDM2012/ PARALLEL SESSIONS http://kicp.uchicago.edu/ http://www.nsf.gov/ http://www.uchicago.edu/ http://www.fnal.gov/ International Advisory Committee Daniel Akerib Elena Aprile Rita Bernabei Case Western Reserve University, Columbia University, USA Universita degli Studi di Roma, Italy Cleveland, USA Gianfranco Bertone Joakim Edsjo Katherine Freese University of Amsterdam Oskar Klein Centre / Stockholm University of Michigan, USA University Richard Gaitskell Gilles Gerbier Anne Green Brown University, USA IRFU/ CEA Saclay, France University of Nottingham, UK Karsten Jedamzik Xiangdong Ji Lawrence Krauss Universite de Montpellier, France University of Maryland, USA Arizona State University, USA Vitaly Kudryavtsev Reina Maruyama Leszek Roszkowski University of Sheffield University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Sheffield, UK Bernard Sadoulet Pierre Salati Daniel Santos University of California, Berkeley, USA University of California, Berkeley, USA LPSC/UJF/CNRS Pierre Sikivie Daniel Snowden-Ifft Neil Spooner University of Florida, USA Occidental College University of Sheffield, UK Max Tegmark Karl van Bibber Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, Research at MIT, USA USA Local Organizing Committee Daniel Bauer Matthew Buckley Juan Collar Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics Scott Dodelson Aimee
    [Show full text]
  • THE COSMIC COCKTAIL Three Parts Dark Matter
    release For immediate release Contact: Andrew DeSio Publication Date: June 11, 2014 (609) 258-5165 [email protected] Weaving a tale of scientific discovery, adventures in cosmology, and the hunt for dark matter, Dr. Katherine Freese explores just what exactly the universe is made out of in THE COSMIC COCKTAIL Three Parts Dark Matter “Freese tells her trailblazing and very personal story of how the worlds of particle physics and astronomy have come together to unveil the mysterious ingredients of the cosmic cocktail that we call our universe.” Brian Schmidt, 2011 Nobel Laureate in Physics, Australian National University What is dark matter? Where is it? Where did it come from? How do scientists study the stuff when they can’t see it? According to current research, our universe consists of only 5% ordinary matter (planets, comets, galaxies) while the rest is made of dark matter (26%) and dark energy (69%). Scientists and researchers are hard at work trying to detect these mysterious phenomena. And there are none further ahead in the pursuit than Dr. Katherine Freese, one of today’s foremost pioneers in the study of dark matter. In her splendidly written new book THE COSMIC COCKTAIL: Three Parts Dark Matter (Publication Date: June 11, 2014; $29.95), Dr. Freese tells the inside story of the epic quest to solve one of the most compelling enigmas of modern science—what is the universe made of? Blending cutting-edge science with her own behind-the-scenes insights as a leading researcher in the field, acclaimed theoretical physicist Katherine Freese recounts the hunt for dark matter, from the predictions and discoveries of visionary scientists like Fritz Zwicky— the Swiss astronomer who coined the term "dark matter" in 1933—to the deluge of data today from underground laboratories, satellites in space, and the Large Hadron Collider.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrien Christian René THOB
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MORPHOLOGY AND KINEMATICS OF GALAXIES AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON DARK MATTER HALO STRUCTURE IN SIMULATED GALAXIES Adrien Christian René THOB A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 26 April 2019 To my grand-parents, René Roumeaux, Christian Thob, Yvette Roumeaux (née Bajaud) and Anne-Marie Thob (née Léglise). ii Abstract Galaxies are among nature’s most majestic and diverse structures. They can play host to as few as several thousands of stars, or as many as hundreds of billions. They exhibit a broad range of shapes, sizes, colours, and they can inhabit vastly differing cosmic environments. The physics of galaxy formation is highly non-linear and in- volves a variety of physical mechanisms, precluding the development of entirely an- alytic descriptions, thus requiring that theoretical ideas concerning the origin of this diversity are tested via the confrontation of numerical models (or “simulations”) with observational measurements. The EAGLE project (which stands for Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments) is a state-of-the-art suite of such cos- mological hydrodynamical simulations of the Universe. EAGLE is unique in that the ill-understood efficiencies of feedback mechanisms implemented in the model were calibrated to ensure that the observed stellar masses and sizes of present-day galaxies were reproduced. We investigate the connection between the morphology and internal 9:5 kinematics of the stellar component of central galaxies with mass M? > 10 M in the EAGLE simulations. We compare several kinematic diagnostics commonly used to describe simulated galaxies, and find good consistency between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Dark Matter an Introduction Into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches
    Particle Dark Matter An Introduction into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches Lecture for ESIPAP 2016 European School of Instrumentation in Particle & Astroparticle Physics Archamps Technopole XENON1T January 25th, 2016 Uwe Oberlack Institute of Physics & PRISMA Cluster of Excellence Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz http://xenon.physik.uni-mainz.de Outline ● Evidence for Dark Matter: ▸ The Problem of Missing Mass ▸ In galaxies ▸ In galaxy clusters ▸ In the universe as a whole ● DM Candidates: ▸ The DM particle zoo ▸ WIMPs ● DM Direct Searches: ▸ Detection principle, physics inputs ▸ Example experiments & results ▸ Outlook Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 2 Types of Evidences for Dark Matter ● Kinematic studies use luminous astrophysical objects to probe the gravitational potential of a massive environment, e.g.: ▸ Stars or gas clouds probing the gravitational potential of galaxies ▸ Galaxies or intergalactic gas probing the gravitational potential of galaxy clusters ● Gravitational lensing is an independent way to measure the total mass (profle) of a foreground object using the light of background sources (galaxies, active galactic nuclei). ● Comparison of mass profles with observed luminosity profles lead to a problem of missing mass, usually interpreted as evidence for Dark Matter. ● Measuring the geometry (curvature) of the universe, indicates a ”fat” universe with close to critical density. Comparison with luminous mass: → a major accounting problem! Including observations of the expansion history lead to the Standard Model of Cosmology: accounting defcit solved by ~68% Dark Energy, ~27% Dark Matter and <5% “regular” (baryonic) matter. ● Other lines of evidence probe properties of matter under the infuence of gravity: ▸ the equation of state of oscillating matter as observed through fuctuations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (acoustic peaks).
    [Show full text]
  • DARK MATTER and NEUTRINOS Arxiv:1711.10564V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph]
    Physics Education 1 dateline DARK MATTER AND NEUTRINOS Gazal Sharma1, Anu2 and B. C. Chauhan3 Department of Physics & Astronomical Science School of Physical & Material Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUHP) Dharamshala, Kangra (HP) INDIA-176215. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (Submitted 03-08-2015) Abstract The Keplerian distribution of velocities is not observed in the rotation of large scale structures, such as found in the rotation of spiral galaxies. The deviation from Keplerian distribution provides compelling evidence of the presence of non-luminous matter i.e. called dark matter. There are several astrophysical motivations for investigating the dark matter in and around the galaxy as halo. In this work we address various theoretical and experimental indications pointing towards the existence of this unknown form of matter. Amongst its constituents neutrino is one of the most prospective candidates. We know the neutrinos oscillate and have tiny masses, but there are also signatures for existence of heavy and light sterile neutrinos and possibility of their mixing. Altogether, the role of neutrinos is of great interests in cosmology and understanding dark matter. arXiv:1711.10564v1 [physics.pop-ph] 23 Nov 2017 1 Introduction revealed in 2013 that our Universe contains 68:3% of dark energy, 26:8% of dark matter, and only 4:9% of the Universe is known mat- As a human being the biggest surprise for us ter which includes all the stars, planetary sys- was, that the Universe in which we live in tems, galaxies, and interstellar gas etc.. This is mostly dark.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Structure in Dark Energy Cosmologies
    HELSINKI INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS INTERNAL REPORT SERIES HIP-2006-08 Formation of Structure in Dark Energy Cosmologies Tomi Sebastian Koivisto Helsinki Institute of Physics, and Division of Theoretical Physics, Department of Physical Sciences Faculty of Science University of Helsinki P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented for public criticism, with the permission of the Faculty of Science of the University of Helsinki, in Auditorium CK112 at Exactum, Gustaf H¨allstr¨omin katu 2, on November 17, 2006, at 2 p.m.. Helsinki 2006 ISBN 952-10-2360-9 (printed version) ISSN 1455-0563 Helsinki 2006 Yliopistopaino ISBN 952-10-2961-7 (pdf version) http://ethesis.helsinki.fi Helsinki 2006 Helsingin yliopiston verkkojulkaisut Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements viii List of publications ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1Darkenergy:observationsandtheories..................... 1 1.2Structureandcontentsofthethesis...................... 6 2Gravity 8 2.1Generalrelativisticdescriptionoftheuniverse................. 8 2.2Extensionsofgeneralrelativity......................... 10 2.2.1 Conformalframes............................ 13 2.3ThePalatinivariation.............................. 15 2.3.1 Noethervariationoftheaction..................... 17 2.3.2 Conformalandgeodesicstructure.................... 18 3 Cosmology 21 3.1Thecontentsoftheuniverse........................... 21 3.1.1 Darkmatter............................... 22 3.1.2 Thecosmologicalconstant........................ 23 3.2Alternativeexplanations............................
    [Show full text]
  • A Derivation of Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2013.46.2.93 46: 93 ∼ 96, 2013 April ISSN:1225-4614 c 2013 The Korean Astronomical Society. All Rights Reserved. http://jkas.kas.org A DERIVATION OF MODIFIED NEWTONIAN DYNAMICS Sascha Trippe Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea E-mail : [email protected] (Received February 14, 2013; Revised March 20, 2013; Accepted March 29, 2013) ABSTRACT Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is a possible solution for the missing mass problem in galac- tic dynamics; its predictions are in good agreement with observations in the limit of weak accelerations. However, MOND does not derive from a physical mechanism and does not make predictions on the transitional regime from Newtonian to modified dynamics; rather, empirical transition functions have to be constructed from the boundary conditions and comparisons with observations. I compare the formalism of classical MOND to the scaling law derived from a toy model of gravity based on virtual massive gravitons (the “graviton picture”) which I proposed recently. I conclude that MOND naturally derives from the “graviton picture” at least for the case of non-relativistic, highly symmetric dynamical systems. This suggests that – to first order – the “graviton picture” indeed provides a valid candidate for the physical mechanism behind MOND and gravity on galactic scales in general. Key words : Gravitation — Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics −10 −2 1. INTRODUCTION where x = ac/am, am ≈ 10 ms is Milgrom’s con- stant, and µ(x)isa transition function with the asymp- “ It is worth remembering that all of the discus- totic behavior µ(x) → 1 for x ≫ 1 and µ(x) → x for sion [on dark matter] so far has been based on x ≪ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    Identification of Dark Matter July 23-27, 2012 9th International Conference Chicago, IL http://kicp-workshops.uchicago.edu/IDM2012/ CONFERENCE PROGRAM http://kicp.uchicago.edu/ http://www.nsf.gov/ http://www.uchicago.edu/ http://www.fnal.gov/ International Advisory Committee Daniel Akerib Elena Aprile Rita Bernabei Case Western Reserve University, Columbia University, USA Universita degli Studi di Roma, Italy Cleveland, USA Gianfranco Bertone Joakim Edsjo Katherine Freese University of Amsterdam Oskar Klein Centre / Stockholm University of Michigan, USA University Richard Gaitskell Gilles Gerbier Anne Green Brown University, USA IRFU/ CEA Saclay, France University of Nottingham, UK Karsten Jedamzik Xiangdong Ji Lawrence Krauss Universite de Montpellier, France University of Maryland, USA Arizona State University, USA Vitaly Kudryavtsev Reina Maruyama Leszek Roszkowski University of Sheffield University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Sheffield, UK Bernard Sadoulet Pierre Salati Daniel Santos University of California, Berkeley, USA University of California, Berkeley, USA LPSC/UJF/CNRS Pierre Sikivie Daniel Snowden-Ifft Neil Spooner University of Florida, USA Occidental College University of Sheffield, UK Max Tegmark Karl van Bibber Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, Research at MIT, USA USA Local Organizing Committee Daniel Bauer Matthew Buckley Juan Collar Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics Scott Dodelson Aimee
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Robert Buckley
    Matthew Robert Buckley Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Cell: 626 379 4337 Department of Physics & Astronomy E-mail: [email protected] 136 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 [email protected] Citizenship United States of America Education • 2003-2008 University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. Theoretical Particle Physics (received May 2008) Advisor: Professor Hitoshi Murayama M.A. Physics (received May 2005) • 1999-2003 Kenyon College B.A. summa cum laude Mathematics and Physics (received May 2003) Work Experience • September 2013-Present Assistant Research Professor, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey • August 2010-August 2013 David N. Schramm Fellow, Fermi National Accel- erator Laboratory • September 2008-August 2010 Du Bridge Postdoctoral Scholar, Prize Fellow, California Institute of Technology • January-May 2008 Foreign Researcher, Institute of Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, Tokyo University • 2006-2008 Graduate Student Researcher with Hitoshi Murayama, University of California, Berkeley • 2003-2006 Graduate Student Instructor, University of California, Berkeley 1 Fellowships and Awards • 2010 David N. Schramm Fellow, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory • 2008 Prize Fellowship, California Institute of Technology • 2004 Outstanding Graduate Student Instructor Award, University of California, Berkeley • 2002 Phi Beta Kappa, Kenyon College • 2002 Franklin Miller Award for Undergraduate Research, Kenyon College • 2001 Goldwater Scholar in Mathematics, Science and Engineering (Barry
    [Show full text]
  • The Contents of the Universe
    Ay 127! The Contents of the Universe 0.5 % Stars and other visible stuff Supernovae alone ⇒ Accelerating expansion ⇒ Λ > 0 CMB alone ⇒ Flat universe ⇒ Λ > 0 Any two of SN, CMB, LSS ⇒ Dark energy ~70% Also in agreement with the age estimates (globular clusters, nucleocosmochronology, white dwarfs) Today’s Best Guess Universe Age: Best fit CMB model - consistent with ages of oldest stars t0 =13.82 ± 0.05 Gyr Hubble constant: CMB + HST Key Project to -1 -1 measure Cepheid distances H0 = 69 km s Mpc € Density of ordinary matter: CMB + comparison of nucleosynthesis with Lyman-a Ωbaryon = 0.04 € forest deuterium measurement Density of all forms of matter: Cluster dark matter estimate CMB power spectrum 0.31 € Ωmatter = Cosmological constant: Supernova data, CMB evidence Ω = 0.69 for a flat universe plus a low € Λ matter density € The Component Densities at z ~ 0, in critical density units, assuming h ≈ 0.7 Total matter/energy density: Ω0,tot ≈ 1.00 From CMB, and consistent with SNe, LSS From local dynamics and LSS, and Matter density: Ω0,m ≈ 0.31 consistent with SNe, CMB From cosmic nucleosynthesis, Baryon density: Ω0,b ≈ 0.045 and independently from CMB Luminous baryon density: Ω0,lum ≈ 0.005 From the census of luminous matter (stars, gas) Since: Ω0,tot > Ω0,m > Ω0,b > Ω0,lum There is baryonic dark matter There is non-baryonic dark matter There is dark energy The Luminosity Density Integrate galaxy luminosity function (obtained from large redshift surveys) to obtain the mean luminosity density at z ~ 0 8 3 SDSS, r band: ρL = (1.8 ± 0.2) 10 h70 L/Mpc 8 3 2dFGRS, b band: ρL = (1.4 ± 0.2) 10 h70 L/Mpc Luminosity To Mass Typical (M/L) ratios in the B band along the Hubble sequence, within the luminous portions of galaxies, are ~ 4 - 5 M/L This includes some dark matter - for pure stellar populations, (M/L) ratios should be slightly lower.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review
    Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review Riccardo Scarpa European Southern Observatory, Chile E-mail [email protected] Abstract. By the time, in 1937, the Swiss astronomer Zwicky measured the velocity dispersion of the Coma cluster of galaxies, astronomers somehow got acquainted with the idea that the universe is filled by some kind of dark matter. After almost a century of investigations, we have learned two things about dark matter, (i) it has to be non-baryonic -- that is, made of something new that interact with normal matter only by gravitation-- and, (ii) that its effects are observed in -8 -2 stellar systems when and only when their internal acceleration of gravity falls below a fix value a0=1.2×10 cm s . Being completely decoupled dark and normal matter can mix in any ratio to form the objects we see in the universe, and indeed observations show the relative content of dark matter to vary dramatically from object to object. This is in open contrast with point (ii). In fact, there is no reason why normal and dark matter should conspire to mix in just the right way for the mass discrepancy to appear always below a fixed acceleration. This systematic, more than anything else, tells us we might be facing a failure of the law of gravity in the weak field limit rather then the effects of dark matter. Thus, in an attempt to avoid the need for dark matter many modifications of the law of gravity have been proposed in the past decades. The most successful – and the only one that survived observational tests -- is the Modified Newtonian Dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Inelastic Dark Matter Scattering Off Thallium Cannot Save DAMA
    NORDITA-2020-123; UTTG-24-2020 Inelastic dark matter scattering off Thallium cannot save DAMA Sunniva Jacobsen,a Katherine Freese,a;b;c Chris Kelso,d Pearl Sandick,e Patrick Stengela;f;g;h aThe Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden bNordita, KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University Roslagstullsbacken 23, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden cDepartment of Physics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78722 dDepartment of Physics, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA eDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, USA f Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy gINFN, Sezione di Trieste, via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy hInstitute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe (IFPU), via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, Italy Abstract. We study the compatibility of the observed DAMA modulation signal with in- elastic scattering of dark matter (DM) off of the 0:1% Thallium (Tl) dopant in DAMA. In this work we test whether there exist regions of parameter space where the Tl interpretation gives a good fit to the most recent data from DAMA, and whether these regions are compati- ble with the latest constraints from other direct detection experiments. Previously, Chang et al. in 2010 [1], had proposed the Tl interpretation of the DAMA data, and more recently (in arXiv:2102.08367v2 [hep-ph] 17 Mar 2021 2019) the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration [2] found regions in parameter space of Tl inelastic scattering that differ by more than 10σ from a no modulation hypothesis.
    [Show full text]