Arxiv:2103.04184V1 [Math.NT] 6 Mar 2021 of Eeal,I Sdffiutt Eemn H E Fiel Fkwihcapitula Which K of Ideals of Set the Determine to Difficult Is It Generally
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3-PRINCIPALIZATION OVER S3-FIELDS S. AOUISSI, M. TALBI, D. C. MAYER, AND M. C. ISMAILI Abstract. Let p 1 (mod 9) be a prime number and ζ3 be a primitive cube root of ≡3 unity. Then k = Q(√p, ζ3) is a pure metacyclic field with group Gal(k/Q) S3. In the ≃ case that k possesses a 3-class group Ck,3 of type (9, 3), the capitulation of 3-ideal classes of k in its unramified cyclic cubic extensions is determined, and conclusions concerning (∞) the maximal unramified pro-3-extension k3 of k are drawn. 1. Introduction Let k be a number field, and L be an unramified abelian extension of k. We say that an ideal of k or its class capitulates in L if becomes principal by extending it to an ideal of L. I I . Generally, it is difficult to determine the set of ideals of k which capitulate in L. Among the first mathematicians who were concerned with this kind of problem is Kronecker, who in 1882 studied the capitulation problem for imaginary quadratic fields. In 1902, Hilbert [12] conjectured that “any ideal of a number field k capitulates in the Hilbert class field k(1) of k”. This conjecture was demonstrated in 1930 by Furtw¨angler [7] after Artin had reduced it to a problem of group theory. Hilbert’s famous Theorem 94 states that “if L/k is an unramified cyclic extension of prime degree p, then there exists an ideal of k of order p which capitulates in L”. The number of ideal classes of k that capitulate in such an extension L is equal to [L : k][Ek : L/k(EL)], where Ek and EL are respectively the groups of the units of k and L, and Nis the relative norm of the extension L/k. Around NL/k 1971, F. Terada, in his famous Tannaka-Terada theorem [24] asserted that “if k/k0 is a cyclic extension, then all the ambiguous classes of k, relative to k0, capitulate in the genus field of k”. A generalization of Hilbert’s Theorem 94 has been conjectured by Miyake arXiv:2103.04184v1 [math.NT] 6 Mar 2021 [20] as follows: “the degree of an unramified abelian extension L/k divides the number of classes of k that capitulate in L”. This conjecture was proved by Suzuki [21] in 1991, who also succeeded, after 7 years of research, in proving a theorem [22] which generalizes all previous results as follows: “if k/k0 is a cyclic extension, and L is an unramified extension Date: Saturday, 06 March 2021. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 11R37, 11R29, 11R32, 11R20, 11R16, secondary 20D15, 20E22, 20F05, 20–04. Key words and phrases. Maximal unramified pro-3-extension, capitulation, Galois action, pure metacyclic fields of degree 6, pure cubic fields; finite 3-groups, descendant trees, presentations. Research of the third author supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): projects J0497-PHY and P26008-N25. 1 2 S.AOUISSI,M.TALBI,D.C.MAYER,ANDM.C.ISMAILI of k abelian over k0, the degree [L : k] divides the number of classes of k invariant under Gal(k/k0)”. Several mathematicians were interested in the study of the problem of capitulation for particular cases of number fields. We cite, for example, the study of capitulation in the intermediate extensions of k(1)/k. When the p-class group of k is of type (p,p), this study was made by S. M. Chang and R. Foote. For other studies we cite the works [4], [5], [14], [15]. Here we contribute to this study with results on the problem of capitulation of the 3 (1) 3-ideal classes of the field k = Q(√p,ζ3) in the intermediate extensions of k3 /k, where p (1) is a prime such that p 1(mod9) and k3 denotes the Hilbert 3-class field of k. ≡ (1) . When the 3-class group Ck,3 is of type (9, 3), the extension k3 /k admits eight interme- diate fields. Figure 1 schematizes the situation. Figure 1. (1) The unramified cubic and nonic sub-extensions of k3 /k k(1) ♦7 3 ❄g❖❖ ♦♦♦ ⑧? _ ❄ ❖❖❖ ♦♦♦ ⑧⑧ ❄❄ ❖❖❖ ♦♦♦ ⑧⑧ ❄❄ ❖❖❖ ♦♦♦ ⑧⑧ ❄❄ ❖❖❖ ♦♦ ⑧⑧ ❄❄ ❖❖ ♦♦♦ ⑧ ❖❖ K K K K 7 4,9 gP 3,9 2,9 7 1,9 ♥♥♥⑥> `❆❆PPP `❆❆ ⑥> ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ ⑥⑥ ❆❆ PPP ❆❆ ⑥⑥ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ ⑥⑥ ❆❆ PPP ❆❆ ⑥⑥ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ ⑥⑥ ❆❆ PPP ❆❆ ⑥⑥ ♥♥♥ ♥♥ ⑥⑥ ❆❆ PP ❆❆ ⑥⑥ ♥♥ ♥♥♥ ⑥ PP ⑥♥♥♥ K K K K 1,3 hPP 2,3 3,3 ♥6 4,3 PPP `❇❇ ⑥> ♥♥♥ PPP ❇❇ ⑥⑥ ♥♥♥ PP ❇❇ ⑥ ♥♥ PPP ❇ ⑥⑥ ♥♥♥ PPP ❇❇ ⑥⑥ ♥♥♥ PPP❇ ⑥⑥♥♥♥ k ♥ In section 2, we propose to determine the family (Ki,j) of all intermediate sub-fields of k K k(1), where 1 i 4 and j 3, 9 , the object of Theorem 2.5, and we then ⊆ i,j ⊆ 3 ≤ ≤ ∈ { } study, in Theorem 3.1 of section 3, the capitulation of 3-ideal classes of k in the fields Ki,j. (∞) Section 4 is devoted to the identification of the maximal unramified pro-3-extension k3 3 of k = Q(√p,ζ3), and to the proof that the dominating proportion (at least 94%) of the (∞) fields k has a metabelian 3-class field tower k3 with exactly two stages. All our theoretical results are based on exhaustive computer results. The usual notation is as follows: 3-PRINCIPALIZATION OVER S3-FIELDS 3 The letter p designates a prime number congruent to 1 modulo 3; • Γ= Q(√3 d): a pure cubic field, where d 2 is a cube-free integer; • k = Q(ζ ): the cyclotomic field, where ζ≥ = e2iπ/3 ; • 0 3 3 k=Γ(ζ3): the normal closure of Γ; • Γ′ and Γ′′: the two conjugate cubic fields of Γ, contained in k; • u = [E : E ]: the index of the sub-group E generated by the units of intermediate • k 0 0 fields of the extension k/Q in the group of units Ek of k; 2 2 3 3 τ = Gal(k/Γ), τ = id, τ(ζ3)= ζ3 and τ(√d)= √d; • h i 3 3 3 σ = Gal(k/k0), σ = id, σ(ζ3)= ζ3 and σ(√d)= ζ3√d; •For h i an algebraic number field L: • – CL,3: the 3-class group of L; (1) – L3 : the Hilbert 3-class field of L; – [ ]: the class of a fractional ideal in the class group of L. I I Unramified cubic and nonic sub-extensions of (1) 2. k3 /k 2.1. Preliminaries. 3 . In his thesis [14], M. C. Ismaili established that the 3-class group Ck,3 of k= Q(√d, ζ3) is of type (3, 3) if and only if 3 divides exactly the class number of Γ and u = 3, where u is the units index defined in the notations, and he determined all the integers d which satisfy this property by distinguishing three types of fields k, namely type I, II, and III. Here, we are interested in the case where the 3-class group Ck,3 is of type (3, 9). Assuming that the number of classes of Γ is divisible exactly by 9, Theorem 2.1 describes the structure of Ck,3 as follows: Theorem 2.1. Let Γ be a pure cubic field, k be its normal closure, Ck,3 (resp. CΓ,3) the 3-class group of k (resp. Γ), and u be the units index defined in the notations, then: C Z/9Z Z/3Z [C Z/9Z and u = 1]. k,3 ≃ × ⇐⇒ Γ,3 ≃ Proof. See [1, Lemma 2.5, p. 4]. . Further, we have classified all the integers d for which the 3-class group Ck,3 is of type (3, 9) in the following Theorem: Theorem 2.2. Let Γ= Q(√3 d) be a pure cubic field, where d 2 is a cube free integer, and 3 ≥ let k = Q(√d, ζ3) be its normal closure. Denote by u the index of the subgroup generated by the units of the intermediate fields of the extension k/Q in the unit group of k. 1) If the field k has a 3-class group of type (9, 3), then d = pe, where p is a prime congruent to 1(mod9) and e =1 or 2. 2) Conversely, if p is a prime congruent to 1(mod9), and if 9 divides exactly the class number of Γ= Q(√3 p) and u =1, then the 3-class group of k is of type (3, 9). Proof. See [1, Theorem 1.1, p. 2]. 4 S.AOUISSI,M.TALBI,D.C.MAYER,ANDM.C.ISMAILI 3 . This being the case, let k be the special field Q(√p,ζ3), with p 1(mod9). Calegari and Emerton [6, Lemma 5.11] proved that the rank of the 3-class group≡ of this field k is equal to 2 if 9 divides the class number of Q(√3 p). The converse of the Calegari-Emerton result is shown by Frank Gerth III in [10, Thm. 1, p. 471]. Assume that 9 divides exactly the 3 class number of Γ = Q(√p), where p 1 (mod 9), then Ck,3 is of type (9, 3) if and only if ≡ u = 1. The generators of Ck,3 when Ck,3 is of type (9, 3) are determined as follows: 3 3 Theorem 2.3. Let k= Q(√p,ζ3), where p is a prime such that p 1(mod9), Γ= Q(√p), (1) ≡ k0 = Q(ζ3), k3 the 3-Hilbert class field of k, Ck,3 the 3-class group of k, we note also C+ = C τ = , and C− = C τ = −1 , where τ = Gal(k/Γ). k,3 {C ∈ k,3 | C C} k,3 {C ∈ k,3 | C C } h i Suppose that C is of type (9, 3).