Battlers, Refugees and the Republic: John Howard's Language Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Battlers, Refugees and the Republic: John Howard's Language Of Dyrenfurth.qxd 22/12/2004 3:54 PM Page 183 Battlers, Refugees and the Republic: John Howard’s Language of Citizenship Nick Dyrenfurth Despite his recent fourth consecutive election victory, John Howard’s greatest legacy for the position of Australian prime minister is unlikely to be viewed in terms of policy development but, rather, the language with which he addressed and sought to influence Australian society. Howard’s policy interventions, or lack thereof, have been the source of continued academic and polemical writing. However, while critics such as Judith Brett have accurately drawn together the assorted threads and inspiration of his language, much analysis has floated free of institutional circumstances. In this article I will explain and contextualise the importance of his discourse in relation to the Australian polity, seeking to avoid the often-reactionary criticism Howard receives, which is frequently removed from a critique of the institutional paradigms that legitimate and indeed encourage his languages. The three disparate themes I will discuss, battlers, refugees and the republic, are instructive in regards to Howard’s sense of citizenship. Australian citizenship is bound up in the nature of Australian institutions and their historical formation. The narrative of whiggish or epochal change within societies and amongst nation- states often obfuscates the longer-term ideological and structural continuities at play within the relations and discourses between individuals, classes and institutions of the state. Language is representative of, and reinforces, such structures and tendencies. Political discourse helps create Benedict Anderson’s notion of ‘imagined community’,1 as well as setting the limits of action, thought and possibility. Citizenship has been linked intimately to the rise of the modern nation-state. At the moment Anderson’s now-famous ‘strangers’ were imagining themselves in abstract community, so too were individuals and the institutions of state beginning to develop a relationship with one another. In the intervening years between Robert Menzies’s prime ministership and the last decade of the twentieth century, it has been argued that Australian society was remade. This is articulated within both admonishing and more celebratory accounts as the undoing of the ‘Australian way’.2 With a sense of crisis and resulting urgency, political economy was transformed amid a period of intensified globalisation. Institutions that had sustained traditional frameworks were either dismantled or interrogated. A previously reassuring cultural homogeneity was both materially and symbolically threatened by diverse migration and notions of multiculturalism. Links to Britain had, for all practical intents and purposes, been severed, resulting in an increasingly anachronistic and monarchical formal head of state. The idea of the British citizen subject carried little meaningful status for Australian citizens. Scholars have documented the legal and administrative ‘ad hoc’ evolutions of Australian citizenship.3 Yet the formal category of Australian citizenship remains contested and the subject of much national debate. In the absence of definitive constitutional or statutory meaning, it was the language of citizenship that filled Dyrenfurth.qxd 22/12/2004 3:54 PM Page 184 Backburning the ‘vacuum’. Australian citizenship has been the (at times uneasy) admixture of ideals and practice, inclusion and exclusion.4 Moreover, it has often been infused with varying degrees of morality, with civic citizenship positioned as a ‘desirable activity’.5 The language of Australian citizenship legitimises and structures discourse, practice and content, and usually claims the interest of the whole in the name of social harmony.6 Mainstream politics has colonised this discursive space; each major party acts within this paradigm, seeking to derive meaning and supremacy, shaping a story of the nation that will create their meanings of past, present and future. For much of its history, Labor privileged its role in socially harmonistic nation-building, interpellating citizens through their primary identity as workers. The term ‘citizen’ was a vexed one for Labourists, its abstraction conflicting with Labor’s idealisation of the practicality of the worker (and politician). For Australian Liberals, the dilemma was less problematic. They explicitly interpelated citizens as individuals and families, arguing for a moral conception of the nation above the fractious ties of class and other fragmentary social groupings, in ‘the language of respectability, deference to Britain and support for the institutions of state’.7 A full account of citizenship must emphasise the highly symbolic, rhetorical and iconographical tools that have defined, and themselves been defined by, public discourse.8 The language of citizenship is never static, being historically contingent and specific. It draws upon and adapts past discourses, as both tradition and present guides to action. How Australians, particularly the nation’s leaders, have ‘imagined’ and ‘argued’ the citizen has framed the boundaries of citizenship. There is an important caveat to such a prioritisation of language: it must act within a certain social reality, rather than necessarily governing social life itself. To understand citizenship more fully, we need to explore its significant intricacies, paying close attention to various constructions of language that have historically utilised (while often simultaneously admonishing) certain peoples within the abstraction and increasing mediation of the public sphere. According to Helen Irving, Australian citizenship developed from the nineteenth century onward as a social construction, rather than a formal political or legal category: [A] concern with citizenship as a particular type of community, imbued with a particular character, has been consistent in Australian history, and the advent of citizenship law has had little impact upon it.9 The early citizen ‘would be a type of person found within the legal category of British subject, but having extra characteristics or qualifications’; thus, ‘the political rights we most readily associate now with citizenship were in this rhetoric not what defined a citizen but what followed from being a citizen’.10 As practice and language demonstrate, the tradition of the imagined type and character has extended (however imperfectly) into the present. In the absence of adequate constitutional or statutory explication, the theoretical notion of a language of Australian citizenship is suggestive, both theoretically and practically. Historically, the language of citizenship has been dominated by the intertwined notions of work and independence, infused with a sense of national identity and moral character.11 For Labor, work was the means by which one could realise independence. In Liberal discourse, it was the mere 184 Dyrenfurth.qxd 22/12/2004 3:54 PM Page 185 Nick Dyrenfurth representation of more intrinsic individual character and (male) judgement, supplemented by notions of duty and service. Such contingent constructions have been increasingly crowded by ‘new competing languages’,12 challenging the homogenous identity of Australians through the notions of race, gender and even consumerism. Nevertheless, the mainstream language of citizenship remains important, actively shaping the experiences of our society and its members. John Howard’s language is the focus of a growing body of academic and journalistic literature, which generally seeks to admonish, rather than search for, the intertwining of the structural, ideological and personal dimensions within his contingent discourse.13 As Paul Strangio argues in his recent review of the edited collection The Howard Years,14 such ‘modulated and sustained moral fury’ is unlikely to engage in ‘constructive dialogue’, and merely scratches the surface of Howard’s tactical politicking. By contrast, Brett suggests: Howard’s opponents have been misled by his own description of himself as a social conservative and so missed his takeover of the symbolic repertoire of Australia’s radical nationalist past to reconnect Australian liberalism with ordinary Australian experience.15 Indeed, in her opinion, ‘Howard has emerged as the most creative Australian Liberal since Menzies, as he … reworked the images, themes and arguments of Liberal Party philosophy’. In Brett’s view Howard, like Menzies, draws on but adapts an ‘inherited political language … recreating a language of social unity and cohesion for the Liberals’.16 While this is undoubtedly true, and Howard is clearly a successful practitioner of Australian liberalism, I would argue that Howard is symptomatic of, and bound up within, a larger institutional and ideological problem: the reliance upon a historically exclusivist discourse that structures and contains collective possibilities. We have reached the contingent point of the continued failure and reproduction of a political culture, as expressed through institutional and ideological settings. Howard, as prime minster, has indeed constructed a coherent and ostensibly consensual language.17 Set-piece speeches and ad hoc interviews both demonstrate the growing vitality and confidence of Howard’s language after 1996 and especially from 2001. Howard’s language spoke of ‘battlers’ and ‘elites’, and was eventually wielded against the embodied form of the refugee. Such language fetishises both an ideal type and the institutions that create and sustain such citizens, while objectifying
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Affluence
    The politics of affluence The Institute’s recent paper on ‘the rise of the middle-class battler’ (Discussion Paper No. 49) appears to have struck a powerful chord in the community. Clive Hamilton, the report’s author, comments on the political implications of ‘imagined hardship’. No. 33 December 2002 A recent Newspoll survey, statement that they cannot afford to buy commissioned by the Institute, reveals everything they really need. that 62 per cent of Australians believe that they cannot afford to buy The politics of affluence everything they really need. When we The proportion of ‘suf- Clive Hamilton consider that Australia is one of the fering rich’ in Australia is world’s richest countries, and that even higher than in the Who should pay for mater- Australians today have incomes three USA, widely regarded as nity leave? times higher than in 1950, it is the nation most obsessed remarkable that such a high proportion Natasha Stott Despoja with money. feel their incomes are inadequate. The Coalition’s Claytons health policy It is even more remarkable that almost Richard Denniss half (46 per cent) of the richest In other words, a fifth of the poorest households in Australia (with incomes households say that they do not have Letter to a farmer over $70,000 a year) say they cannot afford difficulties affording everything they Clive Hamilton to buy everything they really need. The really need, suggesting that they have proportion of ‘suffering rich’ in some money left over for ‘luxuries’. This Deep cuts in greenhouse Australia is even higher than in the USA, is consistent with anecdotal evidence that gases widely regarded as the nation most some older people living entirely on the Clive Hamilton obsessed with money.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Australia May 7Th 2005
    Has he got the ticker? A survey of Australia May 7th 2005 Republication, copying or redistribution by any means is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of The Economist The Economist May 7th 2005 A survey of Australia 1 Has he got the ticker? Also in this section The limits to growth Australia’s constraints are all on the supply side. They need to be tackled. Page 3 Beyond lucky The economy has a lot more going for it than mineral resources. Page 5 Innite variety A beautiful empty country full of tourist attractions. Page 6 The reluctant deputy sheri Australia’s skilful foreign policy has made it many friends. Keeping them all happy will not be easy. Page 7 God under Howard The prime minister keeps on winning elec- tions because he understands how Australia has changed. Page 9 Australia’s economic performance has been the envy of western countries for well over a decade. But, says Christopher Lockwood, the Australians old and new country now needs a new wave of reform to keep going The country seems to be at ease with its new- HE best-loved character in Australian ment, but to win re-election on, policies est arrivals, but not yet with its rst Tfolklore is the battler, the indomi- that were as brutal as they were necessary. inhabitants. Page 11 table little guy who soldiers on despite all It was under this remarkable Labor team the odds, struggling to hold down his job, that the really tough things were done: the raise his family and pay o his mortgage.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert J. Dole
    Robert J. Dole U.S. SENATOR FROM KANSAS TRIBUTES IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES E PL UR UM IB N U U S HON. ROBERT J. DOLE ÷ 1961±1996 [1] [2] S. Doc. 104±19 Tributes Delivered in Congress Robert J. Dole United States Congressman 1961±1969 United States Senator 1969±1996 ÷ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1996 [ iii ] Compiled under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate by the Office of Printing Services [ iv ] CONTENTS Page Biography .................................................................................................. ix Proceedings in the Senate: Prayer by the Senate Chaplain Dr. Lloyd John Ogilvie ................ 2 Tributes by Senators: Abraham, Spencer, of Michigan ................................................ 104 Ashcroft, John, of Missouri ....................................................... 28 Bond, Christopher S., of Missouri ............................................. 35 Bradley, Bill, of New Jersey ...................................................... 43 Byrd, Robert C., of West Virginia ............................................. 45 Campbell, Ben Nighthorse, of Colorado ................................... 14 Chafee, John H., of Rhode Island ............................................. 19 Coats, Dan, of Indiana ............................................................... 84 Cochran, Thad, of Mississippi ................................................... 3 Cohen, William S., of Maine ..................................................... 79 Coverdell, Paul, of Georgia .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Cup Runneth Over | 431
    1987 – Our cup runneth over | 431 1987 Our cup runneth over Life-stories from Fremantle go national Per Henningsgaard Fremantle was a busy place in the lead-up to 1987. Four years earlier, an Australian yachting syndicate skippered by John Bertrand, bankrolled by Perth businessman Alan Bond, and armed with a secret weapon – the controversial winged keel – had wrenched the America’s Cup away from the New York Yacht Club, where the trophy had, until then, resided for an unbroken 132-year stint. A nation that reserved most of its sporting attention for cricket and various football codes was momentarily enthralled by this historic win. The Prime Minster of the day was memorably recorded on television declaring an unofficial public holiday: “Any boss who sacks anyone for not turning up today is a bum,” Bob Hawke eloquently proclaimed. (Hawke had a personal appreciation for record-breaking feats: he boasted a world speed record in beer drinking as a university student). Quickly, sleepy Fremantle, a port town in Western Australia not far from Perth and better known for its well-heeled hippies and stevedores than yachting prowess, found itself at the centre of massive infrastructure projects funded by government and private sources. Following Fremantle’s lead, the State itself was rebranded. Vehicle registration plates no longer incongruously decreed it “The Wildflower State” and “The State of Excitement.” Instead, Western Australia was declared “Home of the America’s Cup.” It was a heady claim that could be made for a short time only; the Cup was lost in 1987 when “Stars and Stripes 87” trounced “Kookaburra III.” Fremantle’s status as the address of the America’s Cup was fleeting, and with it vanished the port town’s claim to have originated a story big enough to capture the nation’s imagination and alter the State’s image.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephite Justice Office PO Box 1508 North Sydney NSW 2059
    Josephite Justice Office PO Box 1508 North Sydney NSW 2059 SUBMISSION TO SELECT COMMITTEE Submission to the inquiry on Australia’s declarations made under certain international laws. Submitted by Josephite Justice Office Contact Jan Barnett rsj Submission to the inquiry on Australia’s declarations made under certain international laws. The Sisters of St Joseph is a religious congregation founded by Mary MacKillop. This submission comes from the Josephite Justice desk. We are grateful to the Senate for this opportunity to comment on this matter of high importance. The circumstances of Australia’s declarations made in 2002 concerning the jurisdiction of the ICJ or ITLOS are a source of disturbance for a growing number of Australians. We share this distress. Further information about these circumstances and about subsequent events impel us to call on the Senate to review the declarations and then to call on the parliament to reverse the declarations. The declarations removed Australia from the oversight of the two UN bodies which concern themselves with maritime boundary matters. It is now common knowledge that Australia used its withdrawal to engage in acts which severely disadvantaged Timor-Leste, in attempts to bring to Australian interests significant financial gain instead. The Timorese long-held preference for an internationally recognised border was unable to be pursued due to Australia’s highly advantageous position in not being under scrutiny as negotiations progressed. Furthermore, Australia sought to gain even greater benefits by spying on the Timorese during those negotiations. There are more untoward consequences of the decision to withdraw from the ICJ and ITLOS conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity and Growth
    Proceedings of a Conference PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH Economic Group Reserve Bank of Australia Proceedings of a Conference held at the H.C. Coombs Centre for Financial Studies, Kirribilli on 10/11 July 1995 PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH Editors: Palle Andersen Jacqueline Dwyer David Gruen Economic Group Reserve Bank of Australia The publication of these Conference papers is aimed at making the results of research done in the Bank, and elsewhere, available to a wider audience. The views expressed are those of the authors, and not necessarily those of the Bank. References to the results and views presented should clearly attribute them to the authors, not to the Bank. The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, sold or distributed without the prior consent of the Reserve Bank of Australia. ISBN 0 642 23409 4 Printed in Australia by Ambassador Press Pty Ltd Table of Contents Introduction Jacqueline Dwyer 1 The Determinants of Long-Run Growth Steve Dowrick 7 Discussant: Bharat Trehan 48 Measuring Economic Progress Ian Castles 53 Discussant: John Quiggin 89 Labour-Productivity Growth and Relative Wages: 1978-1994 Philip Lowe 93 Discussant: David Mayes 135 Problems in the Measurement and Performance of Service-Sector Productivity in the United States Robert Gordon 139 Discussant: Stephen Poloz 167 Case Studies of the Productivity Effects of Microeconomic Reform Productivity Change in the Australian Steel Industry: BHP Steel 1982-1995 Peter Demura 172 The Performance of the NSW Electricity Supply Industry John Pierce, Danny Price and Deirdre
    [Show full text]
  • Sally Morgan: Aboriginal Identity Retrieved and Performed Within and Without My Place
    Sally Morgan: Aboriginal Identity Retrieved and Performed within and without My Place Martin RENES Universidad de Barcelona [email protected] Recibido: 13/05/2010 Aceptado: 15/06/2010 ABSTRACT Sally Morgan’s auto/biography My Place (1987) played an important but contested role in recovering the indigenous heritage for Australia’s national self-definition when the country set out to celebrate the start of British colonisation with the Bicentennial (1988). My Place is strategically placed at a cultural and historical crossroads that has placated praise as well as criticism for its particular engagement with mainstream readership. indigenous and non-indigenous scholarship has pointed out how Morgan’s novel arguably works towards an assimilative conception of white reconciliation with an unacknowledged past of indigenous genocide, but two decades after its publication, the text’s ambiguous, hybrid nature may merit a more positive reading. A sophisticated merging of indigenous and non-indigenous genres of story-telling boosting a deceptive transparency, My Place inscribes Morgan’s aboriginality performatively as part of a long-standing, complex commitment to a re(dis)covered identity. On the final count, My Place’s engaged polyphony of indigenous voices traces a textual songline through the neglected and silenced history of the Stolen Generations, allowing a hybrid Aboriginal inscription of Sally Morgan’s identity inside and outside the text. Keywords: Australian Indigeneity, Aboriginal history, identity formation, reconciliation, performance Sally Morgan: la identidad Indígena recuperada y articulada dentro y fuera de Mi Lugar RESUMEN La auto/biografía Mi Lugar (1987) de la mestiza Sally Morgan jugó un papel importante aunque polémico en la recuperación de la herencia Indígena para la autodefinición nacional australiana cuando el país celebró el bicentenario (1988) del comienzo de la colonización británica.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Families Are Aussie Battlers
    Lost in the Struggle: Aussie Battlers in the Rhetoric of Opposition Joshua Bee Abstract This essay examines the role of the Aussie Battler in Australian political rhetoric. I argue that the Aussie Battler is a rhetorical incarnation of economic struggle, in which an Opposition utilises an ambiguity akin to dog whistling to foment and direct dissatisfaction towards an incumbent Government. Concepts like these are necessarily self-limiting after the Opposition deploying them is elected, as the circumstances from which they arise directly conflict with the expected rhetoric of competent and effective Government. Whilst particular incarnations of this rhetoric may hold partisan connotations, for instance Howard’s Battlers or Rudd’s Working Families, the pool of discontent they seek to foment and mobilise remains largely consistent. Curiously, this ongoing manipulation and promise of representation seems to undermine the essence of the Battler cultural ethic that makes identification with such articulations rhetorically significant. Introduction In 1988 John Howard, as Leader of the Opposition, gave a speech designed to foster a sense of disjuncture between the Government, and Australians who felt that - for a reason that perhaps was not entirely clear - life was harder than it should be.1 Over the next eight years, a shadowy horde of Aussie Battlers banded together against an elitist Government that was ‘out of touch’, and in 1996, ‘Howard’s Battlers’ were widely credited with delivering Australia its first Liberal Government in over a decade.2 Whilst their significance as a construct necessarily diminished during the Howard years, the pool of potentialities from which the Aussie Battler arose remained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battler's
    Blue Gum, No. 6, 2019, ISSN 2014-21-53, Observatori: Centre d’Estudis Australians / Australian Studies Centre, Universitat de Barcelona Copyright©2019. Lorne Walker Nolan. This text may be archived and redistributed both in electronic form and in hard copy, provided that the author and journal are properly cited and no fee is charged. BATTLER’S BOY Can you love the father you never knew? LORNE WALKER NOLAN !32 Blue Gum, No. 6, 2019, ISSN 2014-21-53, Observatori: Centre d’Estudis Australians / Australian Studies Centre, Universitat de Barcelona Battler Noun -An Australian colloquialism that refers to working-class people who persevere through their life’s adversities and challenges such as poor jobs, afflictions and lack of respect. They often live at subsistence level. -It has become a term of encouragement and affection for those at the lowest rungs of society. For my mother Shirley Author Bio: Lorne Walker Nolan was born in Melbourne, and raised in and near St Kilda, to New Zealand parents. He was an English language teacher in Tokyo, before returning to Australia and becoming a prosecution lawyer in the Northern Territory and rural Victoria. He moved to Spain in 2005 and is a legal academic and lecturer in Barcelona, where he is completing a PhD. !33 Blue Gum, No. 6, 2019, ISSN 2014-21-53, Observatori: Centre d’Estudis Australians / Australian Studies Centre, Universitat de Barcelona Prologue: Where the Outback Meets the Sea The sea is rough and cold in July, where the Outback meets the sea. The beach sand is a blood red, Outback red.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Proceedings
    PROOF ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/ E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (07) 3406 7314 Fax: (07) 3210 0182 Subject FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-THIRD PARLIAMENT Page Tuesday, 15 November 2011 ASSENT TO BILLS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3545 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 28 October 2011, from Her Excellency the Governor to Mr Speaker advising of assent to bills on 28 October 2011....................................................................................................... 3545 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 4 November 2011, from Her Excellency the Governor to Mr Speaker advising of assent to bills on 4 November 2011. .................................................................................................... 3545 SPEAKER’S STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................................................ 3546 Loan of Documents ............................................................................................................................................................ 3546 PRIVILEGE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3546 Speaker’s Ruling, Ethics Committee Report .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of English and American Studies English
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Hana Smištíková Archetypal Features in Australian Cinema: Representation of Aborigines Bachelor‟s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: PhDr. Jitka Vlčková, Ph. D. 2013 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Author‟s signature Acknowledgement I would like to thank to my supervisor PhDr. Jitka Vlčková, Ph.D. for her guidance and help. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. THE ABORIGINAL PERSPECTIVE ................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Lost child ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.1.1. Children and the environment ....................................................................................... 10 1.1.2. Teenage dilemma and “decolonization”........................................................................ 12 1.1.3. Aboriginal notion of country ........................................................................................... 14 2. THE BLACK TRACKER ....................................................................................................................... 18 3. THE BATTLER(S) ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Aussie Bloke': Gender, Class and Contextualizing a Hegemony Of
    Looking out for the ‘Aussie Bloke’: Gender, Class and Contextualizing a Hegemony of Working-Class Masculinities in Australia. Kirsty Whitman School of Humanities and Social Science Discipline of Gender Studies and Social Analysis (60%) and Politics (40%). Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2013. Contents Abstract …..v Declaration ….. vi Acknowledgements ….. vii Introduction …..1 Contextualizing a Hegemony of Centralizing Working-Class Masculinity ….. 5 Gender and Legitimate Australian-ness ….. 10 Format and Structure ….. 12 Chapter 1: Theorizing the ‘Aussie Bloke’: Gender, Masculinities, Class and the Hegemony of Centralizing Working-Class Masculinities Introduction ….. 21 Gender and Masculinity ….. 23 Modern and Postmodern Accounts of Gender: Masculinity Theory, Sexuality and Discourse ….. 25 Masculinity/Masculinities: Debates and Clarifications ….. 28 Recognizing Variations and Fluidity: Multiple Masculinities ….. 33 Contextualizing Hegemonic Masculinity/Masculinities, Hegemony and Men ….. 37 Hegemony, Gender and Class ….. 46 Intersections of Class and Gender ….. 49 Class: Moving Beyond Economic Categories ….. 50 Theoretical Conclusions and Use of Terms ….. 61 Conclusion ….. 64 Chapter 2: It’s Not Just Something Working-Class Men Do: The Methodological Journey to a Discursive Approach to Centralizing Working-Class Masculinities Introduction ….. 67 Identifying as a Working-Class Woman ….. 70 Terminology: The Methodological Journey to Centralizing Working-Class Masculinity ….. 73 Qualitative Methodology and Feminist Research ….. 75 ii Critical Discourse and Textual Analysis ….. 78 Recruitment of Participants ….. 83 The Reflexive Standpoint of the Participants: Gender, Class and Mistrust of Academic Elites ….. 87 Gender as an Issue ….. 88 Culture and Class ….. 91 Telephone Interviews ….. 92 Question Choice ….. 95 Reading the Unsaid ….. 96 Changes in Scope and Methodology: The Eventual Structure of this Study ….
    [Show full text]