Lawsuit to (A) Defendants, (B) EPA, (C) the Texas Commission On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lawsuit to (A) Defendants, (B) EPA, (C) the Texas Commission On Case 4:10-cv-04969 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/13/10 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ___________________________________________ ENVIRONMENT TEXAS CITIZEN LOBBY, INC., and SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 4:10-cv-4969 v. EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL COMPANY, and EXXONMOBIL REFINING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendants. ___________________________________________ COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION 1. Defendants own and operate an industrial complex in Baytown, Texas (the “Baytown Complex” or “Complex”) consisting of an oil refinery, chemical plant, and olefins plant. It is the largest petroleum and petrochemical complex in the United States. The refinery in the Baytown Complex is the largest refinery in the United States. The Baytown Complex covers approximately 3,400 acres along the Houston Ship Channel, about 25 miles east of Houston. According to the most recent publicly available inventories of air pollution from stationary sources, the Baytown Complex emits more pollutants into the air than any other industrial complex in Harris County. 2. Defendants are violating the federal Clean Air Act (the “CAA” or “Act”). Over the last five years they have emitted more than eight million pounds of pollutants into the atmosphere from the Baytown Complex in excess of legal limits imposed by federal and state Case 4:10-cv-04969 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/13/10 Page 2 of 30 regulations and by Clean Air Act permits issued by the State of Texas. The types of pollutants the Baytown Complex emits are known to cause a variety of problems: for example, some are carcinogenic, some cause and aggravate respiratory and other illnesses, and some contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone, a major constituent of smog. Over the past five years, pollutants that the Baytown Complex has illegally emitted include: sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, hexane, toluene, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride, propane, ethylene, butane, and butene. 3. According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), thousands of people live within a mile of the Baytown Complex; tens of thousands of people live within three miles of the Baytown Complex; and hundreds of thousands of people live within ten miles of the Baytown Complex. 4. Plaintiffs are citizen-based environmental organizations with individual members who live and work close to the Baytown Complex. Plaintiffs’ members breathe, and are exposed in other ways, to more harmful pollutants than they otherwise would be, as a direct result of the Baytown Complex’s excess air emissions that violate the Act. These excess emissions of pollutants have adverse impacts on these individuals’ health, and on their recreational, aesthetic, and other interests. Excess emissions from the Baytown Complex cause and contribute to chest congestion, coughing, fatigue, headaches, itching eyes, and other conditions among Plaintiffs’ members. Plaintiffs’ members worry that the Complex’s excess emissions heighten the risk of cancer. 5. Excess emissions from the Baytown Complex create and contribute to undesirable and noxious odors. Plaintiffs’ members frequently see smoke coming from the Complex, and the Complex’s flares routinely light up the night sky. When the flares rumble during their operation, 2 Case 4:10-cv-04969 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/13/10 Page 3 of 30 Plaintiffs’ members can hear them and some can even feel the vibrations they cause. Plaintiffs’ members who live near the Baytown Complex worry that operational problems at the Complex will cause explosions. 6. Defendants’ violations of the Act harm public health and the environment. However, EPA and the State of Texas have failed to take enforcement actions sufficient to stop Defendants’ ongoing violations of the Act. Section 304(a) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604, authorizes citizens to bring suit in federal court to enforce the Act. This CAA “citizen suit provision” authorizes citizens to obtain an injunction and civil penalties (up to $32,500 per day for each violation of the Act, increasing to $37,500 as of January 12, 2009) against violators. Under the law, such penalties are not paid to plaintiffs, but rather to the United States Treasury or to beneficial mitigation projects that enhance public health or the environment. 7. Defendants’ violations of the Act are set forth in Counts I through VII, below. The violations alleged have a variety of underlying causes. These include, but are not limited to, equipment failures and malfunctions, operational problems, electrical problems, inadequate maintenance, poor record keeping, and other longstanding systemic problems. Plaintiffs are unaware of any actions by the Defendants that have solved, or will solve, these persistent problems, or that will otherwise eliminate similar violations of the Act, in the future. Absent an appropriate order from this Court, Defendants will continue to violate the Act as described in Counts I through VII. 3 Case 4:10-cv-04969 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/13/10 Page 4 of 30 PARTIES Plaintiffs 8. Plaintiffs bring this suit on behalf of their individual members who are adversely affected by the Baytown Complex’s excess emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, and other air pollutants in violation of the Act. These violations have deleterious impacts on public health and the environment in the areas where Plaintiffs’ members live, work, and recreate. Plaintiffs are “persons” within the meaning of section 302(e) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7602(e). 9. Plaintiff Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. (“Environment Texas”) is a Texas corporation. It is a statewide, non-profit, environmental organization that advocates for clean air, clean water, and preservation of Texas’ natural areas, among other issues, on behalf of approximately 5,000 citizen members from across the state of Texas. Among other activities, Environment Texas researches and distributes analytical reports on environmental issues, advocates before legislative and administrative bodies, conducts public education, and pursues public interest litigation on behalf of its members. 10. Plaintiff Sierra Club, a California non-profit corporation with an office in Austin, is the nation’s oldest and largest conservation organization, with approximately 1.3 million members nationwide. The Lone Star Chapter has approximately 24,000 Texas members, including nearly 5,000 members in Harris County, who are dedicated to exploring, enjoying, and protecting Texas’ natural resources and wild places. Sierra Club promotes the responsible use of the earth’s ecosystem and resources, and works to restore the quality of the natural and human environment. In addition to organizing nature outings and public education campaigns, Sierra 4 Case 4:10-cv-04969 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/13/10 Page 5 of 30 Club and its Texas members pursue advocacy and litigation on issues including clean air and clean water, solid waste reduction, and sustainable energy and land use policies. Defendants 11. Defendant ExxonMobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”) is a multinational oil and gas corporation. ExxonMobil owns and operates the Baytown Complex. Federal Clean Air Act operating permits for the chemical plant (“Baytown Chemical Plant”) and the olefins plant (“Baytown Olefins Plant”) in the Complex are in the name of ExxonMobil. 12. Defendant ExxonMobil Chemical Company (“Exxon Mobil Chemical”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of ExxonMobil. It is one of the largest petrochemical companies in the world. It owns and operates the Baytown Chemical and Olefins Plants. The Baytown Chemical Plant produces more than 7.2 billion pounds of petrochemical products each year. The Baytown Olefins Plant produces 6 billion pounds of ethylene, propylene, and butadiene; it is one of the largest ethylene plants in the world. 13. Defendant ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company (“ExxonMobil Refining and Supply”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of ExxonMobil. It is the largest global refiner. ExxonMobil Refining and Supply owns and operates the refinery at the Complex (“Baytown Refinery”). The federal Clean Air Act operating permit for the refinery is in the name of ExxonMobil Refining and Supply. 14. The Baytown Refinery, Baytown Chemical Plant and Baytown Olefins Plant are highly integrated in their design and operation. 15. Defendants are “persons” within the meaning of section 302(e) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7602(e). 5 Case 4:10-cv-04969 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/13/10 Page 6 of 30 JURISDICTION, VENUE AND NOTICE 16. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to section 304(a) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 7604(a), and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 17. Venue lies in this District pursuant to section 304(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(c)(1), because the Baytown Complex is a stationary source, or a collection of stationary sources, located within this District. 18. Plaintiffs gave notice of the violations alleged in this Complaint more than 60 days prior to commencement of this lawsuit to (a) Defendants, (b) EPA, (c) the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”), and (d) the Governor of Texas. Notice was provided by letters dated November 30, 2009 (“First Notice Letter,” attached here as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein), and July 2, 2010 (“Second Notice letter,” attached here as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein). The notice letters were addressed to Rex Tillerson, President and Chief Executive Officer of ExxonMobil Corporation. The notice letters were also sent to the President of ExxonMobil Chemical Company, the President of ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company, the Baytown Refinery manager, the Baytown Chemical Plant manager, and the Baytown Olefins Plant manager. Copies of the First and Second Notice letters were sent contemporaneously to the Administrator of EPA, the Regional Administrator for EPA Region VI, the Executive Director of TCEQ, the Governor of Texas, and the registered agents for the Defendants.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the American Petroleum Institute Photograph and Film Collection, 1860S-1980S
    Guide to the American Petroleum Institute Photograph and Film Collection, 1860s-1980s NMAH.AC.0711 Bob Ageton (volunteer) and Kelly Gaberlavage (intern), August 2004 and May 2006; supervised by Alison L. Oswald, archivist. August 2004 and May 2006 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Historical Photographs, 1850s-1950s....................................................... 6 Series 2: Modern Photographs, 1960s-1980s........................................................ 75 Series 3: Miscellaneous
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Jp-5, Jp-8, and Jet a Fuels
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR JP-5, JP-8, AND JET A FUELS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry March 2017 JP-5, JP-8, AND JET A FUELS ii DISCLAIMER Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. JP-5, JP-8, AND JET A FUELS iii UPDATE STATEMENT A Toxicological Profile for JP-5, JP-8, and Jet A Fuels, Draft for Public Comment was released in February 2016. This edition supersedes any previously released draft or final profile. Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences Environmental Toxicology Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE Mailstop F-57 Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027 JP-5, JP-8, AND JET A FUELS iv This page is intentionally blank. JP-5, JP-8, AND JET A FUELS v FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines* developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a substance's toxicologic properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Refinery MACT Summary Report: Evaluating Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Data
    Refinery MACT Summary Report: Evaluating Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Data Established March 2020 Updated: 2021Q2 TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... III BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 1 AIR MONITORING FOR BENZENE ............................................................................................ 1 BENZENE FENCELINE MONITORING ................................................................................................................... 1 TCEQ STATIONARY AMBIENT AIR MONITORING ................................................................................................. 1 EVALUATION OF AMBIENT AIR MONITORING DATA ............................................................... 2 EPA DELTA C CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 2 TCEQ LONG-TERM AMCV COMPARISON ......................................................................................................... 2 IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL SAMPLERS OF INTEREST .................................................................. 3 FACILITIES WITH SOIS ABOVE THE LONG-TERM AMCV FOR BENZENE .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Occupational & Process Safety
    NATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL GRAND HYATT SAN ANTONIO & PROCESS SAFETY MAY 17 – 18, 2016 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION SAFETY AWARDS EVENT 2016 AFPM SAFETY AWARDS PROGRAM The presentation of the AFPM AFPM CONGRATULATES ALL Safety Award plaques is part of a comprehensive safety awards program OF THIS YEAR’S AWARD which the Association’s Safety & Health RECIPIENTS ON THEIR Committee has developed to promote safety performance achievements in OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENTS. the petroleum refining, petrochemical manufacturing, and contracting industries and to publicly recognize the excellent BEST WISHES FOR A SAFE 2016. record of safety in operations which the industries and contractors have achieved. AFPM Safety Awards are based on records kept for employees in accordance with OSHA record keeping requirements as defined by law and entered on the OSHA 300A summary form and API RP 754, Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Distinguished Safety Award The Safety Awards Program honors Elite Gold Safety Award AFPM Regular member companies Elite Silver Safety Award operating U.S. refineries and petrochemical manufacturing plants as 2 Merit and Achievement Awards well as Associate member contractors working in those facilities. The program 9 Contractor Merit Awards consists of the following awards. 27 Quick Reference Alphabetical 29 AFPM Safety and Health Committee 33 News Release MASTERS OF Master of Ceremonies CEREMONIES Robert Bahr Global Process Safety & Risk Manager – Exxon Mobil Corporation, AFPM Safety & Health Committee Chair Ronald Meyers Principal EHS Professional – Axiall Corporation, AFPM Safety & Health Committee Presentation of DSA Awards Gregory Goff Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – Tesoro Corporation AFPM Chairman of the Board 2 Cover photograph ©Shutterstock.
    [Show full text]
  • Covestro Welcomes New Site Manager Enterprise Products Helping to Lead Way for U.S
    Greater LIFE ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST April 2019 $3.95 Covestro welcomes new site manager Enterprise Products Helping to lead way for U.S. energy renaissance KEEP YOU MOVING without joint pain Live life without joint pain. At Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine in Baytown, we know that joint pain affects every part of your life. With treatment plans customized for you, our specialists offer a full range of advanced nonsurgical and surgical techniques, including: • Innovative pain control methods • Physical therapy to improve mobility and range of motion Baytown • Latest technology, including minimally invasive surgical techniques • Presurgical education programs for joint replacement We can help you fi nd relief from joint pain — so you can keep moving. Schedule an appointment: houstonmethodist.org/jointpain 281.427.7400 Greater LIFE ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST OnBAYTOWN the cover Our staff PUBLISHER EDITORIAL Carol Skewes David Bloom managing editor Michael Pineda ADVERTISING assistant managing editor Dean West manager Alan Dale sports editor Demetri Zervoudis, a native of Greece, will oversee Matt Hollis Covestro’s largest manufacturing facility in North America, the Baytown plant, serving as its senior vice president. ACCOUNT Christopher James EXECUTIVES Mark Fleming See more, pages 20-21 Cathy Loftin Lori Knight ACCOUNTING In this issue P. K. Wolfe Misty Warner business manager We bring you the petrochemical issue of Greater Baytown in April with an introduction to Covestro’s Deborah Robertson new senior vice president, Demetri Zervoudis. IMAGING He replaces Rod Herrick, who will now focus on his new duties as venture manager oversseeing Bridgett Tucker CIRCULATION Covestro’s MDI investment project (page 6 & 20)).
    [Show full text]
  • I. Power Plants and Refineries in the Counties Surrounding Trinity River NWR
    Appendix I. Power Plants and Refineries in the Counties Surrounding Trinity River NWR I. Power Plants and Refineries in the Counties Surrounding Trinity River NWR Table I-1. Power Plants Utility Plant Name MegaWatt County Abitibi Consolidated - Sheldon Abiitibi Consolidated Sheldon 97.2 Harris AES Deepwater Inc AES Deepwater 184 Harris Air Liquide America - Pt Arthur Port Neches Plant 38 Jefferson Air Liquide Large Industries Bayou Cogen Plant 300 Harris U S LP Air Products LP Pasadena 6.5 Harris Air Products LP Air Products Pt Arthur 40.6 Jefferson BASF Corp NAFTA Regional Olefins 83.2 Jefferson Complex Cogen Fac Calpine Central LP Amelia Energy Center 0 Jefferson Calpine Central LP Baytown Energy Center 914.6 Chambers Calpine Corp-Texas City Texas City power Plant 450 Galveston Cedar Power Partners LP Cedar Power Project 0 Liberty Chambers Energy LP Harris Energy Facility 0 Harris Channel Energy Center Channel Energy Center, 715 Harris Clear Lake Cogeneration Clear Lake Cogeneration LP Clear Lake Cogeneration Ltd 465.2 Harris Cogen Lyondell CoGen Lyondell 564 Harris Deer Park Energy Center Deer Park Energy Center 996 Harris Entergy Gulf States Inc Neches 295.8 Jefferson Enterprise Products Optg LP Enterprise Product Operating 25.7 Chambers Exelon Generation Co LLC Exelon LaPorte Generating Station 236 Harris Exxon Mobil Refining and Supply ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery 214.9 Harris Co Exxon Mobil Refining and Supply ExxonMobil Baytown Turbine 376.9 Harris Co ExxonMobil Corp ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery 369.6 Jefferson Goodyear Tire and
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Fuels Solutions and Locations| Exxonmobil
    Sales and service Wholesale fuel sales “ ExxonMobil is the absolute best across the You supply the fuel that keeps the country moving and progress growing – a critical and often board — from their professionalism, supply challenging task. That’s why we offer the technical reliability and customer service.” – A large, expertise and facilities to ensure our high-quality products meet or exceed your needs in all US-based distributor of petroleum products anticipated conditions. Your business will be handled reliably, efficiently, Product quality team courteously and confidentially by our We maintain market-leading quality standards and knowledgeable personnel who provide the highest actively participate in the development of ASTM level of support. standards. Our commitment includes: • Each customer is designated a Sales Account • Support from dedicated resources and a global Manager as a single point of contact for all organization with extensive experience account needs. • Fuel inspections at key points in the distribution • Connect with us by visiting our website: system, from refinery to delivery exxonmobil.com/en/wholesale-fuels/contact-us • SDSs available online at msds.exxonmobil.com A trusted partnership Customer service We work with you to develop offers that meet your To ensure that your needs are met and specific fueling needs, with options including: expectations exceeded, we strive to be flawless, • Flexible contracts efficient and responsive. You can count on: – 90-day Evergreen to multi-year contracts • Constant support from
    [Show full text]
  • Situated in the Epicenter of the Economic Boom on the Texas Gulf Coast
    Situated in the Epicenter of the Economic Boom on the Texas Gulf Coast Located near the Houston Ship Channel and Trinity Bay with Excellent Access to the Port of Houston Opportunity to Acquire the Newly Renovated, 56 Unit Class B+ Multi- Verve Apartments Family Asset in a Prime Baytown Location! KET Enterprises Incorporated I 1770 St. James Place, Suite 382 I Houston, TX 77056 I 713.355.4646 I www.ketent.com THE VERVE 3201 GARTH RD BAYTOWN, TX 77521 The Verve • 3201 Garth Road • Baytown, TX 77521 Asking Price $4,400,000 Units: 56 Price Per Unit $78,571 Avg Size: 827 Price Per Sq. Ft. $94.97 Date Built: 1963 Terms ALL CASH Rentable Sq. Ft.: 46,328 Acreage: 2.43 Occupancy: 91% Class: B++ INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS ► Blue/White Collar Profile ► Brick and Stucco Construction ► There is Tremendous Economic Growth in Baytown ► Exterior Renovations Completed - $1.36M ► Interior Renovations Completed - $700K ► Excellent School District - This is a Strong Plus! ► Ideal for Long Term Cash Flow! ► Rents are Rising! ► The Houston Ship Channel is Expanding ► The Ship Channel Will Add Approximately 100,000 jobs! ► Property Did NOT Flood During Hurricane Harvey Available All Cash or On An Assumption Basis for ► $4,250,000 PLEASE CALL FOR MORE DETAILS: TOM WILKINSON Broker/Vice President [email protected] 713-355-4646 ext 102 KET Enterprises Incorporated I 1770 St. James Place, Suite 3802 I Houston, TX 77056 I 713.355.4646 I www.ketent.com The Verve • 3201 Garth Road • Baytown, TX 77521 Physical Information Financial Information Existing Loan Parameters Operating Information Number of Units 56Asking Price $4,400,000 Mortgage Balance $3,515,000Est Mkt Rent (May-21) $52,696 Avg Unit Size 756Price Per Unit $78,571Amortization (months) 360 12 Mo Avg $47,984 Net Rentable Area 46,328Price Per Sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxonmobil Events
    ExxonMobil Events The following events were obtained from the Department of Energy (DOE) website: Baltimore County Maryland Jury Finds ExxonMobil Must Pay Residents $150 Million in Damages from 26,000 Gallon Gasoline Spill in 2006 Reuters, 15:10 March 12, 2009 Posted to DOE website 3-12-09 Illinois Attorney General Files Suit over August 6 Propane, Hydrofluoric Acid Discharge at ExxonMobil’s 238,600 b/d Joliet, Illinois Refinery—Incident Injured One Employee DJN, 10:54 October 8, 2009. Posted to DOE website 10-8-09 ExxonMobil Process Safety Events 2009 1. ExxonMobil Bypasses CO Boiler on Burner Failures at 348,500 b/d Beaumont, Texas Refinery February 13 http://www11.tceq.state.tx.us/oce/eer/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.getDetails&target=120153 Posted to DOE website 2-13-09. Update: Production Unaffected by FCC Boiler Shutdown at ExxonMobil’s 348,500 b/d Beaumont, Texas Refinery A spokesperson for ExxonMobil said production was not affected by the mid-week shutting of a gasoline-making fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) boiler at the company’s Beaumont refinery. A malfunction of the boiler feedwater pump caused the shutdown on February 25. Reuters, 10:24 February 27, 2009. Posted to DOE website 2-27-09 2. ExxonMobil Corrects Sulfur Plant Valve Malfunction at 149,500 b/d Torrance, California Refinery by February 23 http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2332853420090223. Posted to DOE website 2-23-09. 3. Hydrocracker Valve Leak at ExxonMobil’s 567,000 b/d Baytown, Texas Refinery over Weekend—No Affect to Production, Company Says http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssEnergyNews/idUKN2332968020090223 http://www11.tceq.state.tx.us/oce/eer/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.getDetails&target=120401 Posted to DOE website 2-21-09.
    [Show full text]
  • Galveston Bay National Estuary Program Directory of Participants
    GALVESTON BAY NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM DIRECTORY OF PARTICIPANTS Publication GBNEP - 4 August 1990 Mr. B. J. Wynne, III, Chair Robert Layton, Vice-chair Chairman, Texas Water Commission Administrator, US EPA, Region 6 Policy Committee Mr. Walter Cardwell The Honorable Jon Lindsay Chairman, County Judge, Harris County Texas Water Development Board Ms. Carol Dinkins Mr. Frank Smith, Jr. Vinson & Elkins Galveston Bay Foundation Mr. John Wilson Kelsey The Honorable Terral Smith Commissioner, Texas House of Representatives Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Local Governments Advisory Committee The Honorable Ray Holbrook, Chair Management Committee Mr. Myron Knudson, Chair Dr. Clyde Bohmfalk, Vice-chair Scientific/Technical Advisory Committee Dr. Sammy Ray, Chair Dr. Frank M. Fisher, Vice-chair Citizens Advisory Steering Committee Ms. Sharron Stewart, Chair Ms. Glenda Callaway, Vice-chair Galveston Bay Public Forum Dr. Martin Arisco, Chair Dr. Don Bass, Vice-chair Dr. Frank Shipley, Program Director ii THE GALVESTON BAY NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM The Galveston Bay National Estuary Program (GBNEP) is a management conference composed of six committees and a Program Office. This organizational structure is shown in Figure 1. The committee members were appointed under the authority of Governor William P. Clements, Jr., and Robert Layton, Administrator, EPA Region VI, to represent the broadest possible spectrum of interested Galveston Bay users. One committee, the Galveston Bay Public Forum, is open to anyone with a desire to join. Numerous subcommittees have also been appointed for specific tasks, and these may also include individuals who are not conference members. The function of the GBNEP is to create a Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for Galveston Bay by September of 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:05-Cv-05809 Document #: 20-1 Filed: 04/13/21 Page 1 of 84 Pageid #:550
    Case: 1:05-cv-05809 Document #: 20-1 Filed: 04/13/21 Page 1 of 84 PageID #:550 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) STATE OF LOUISIANA, and the ) STATE OF MONTANA ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 05 C 5809 ) v. ) The Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer ) EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and ) EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION ) ) Defendants. ) ) FOURTH CONSENT DECREE AMENDMENT CONCERNING EXXONMOBIL’S JOLIET REFINERY Case: 1:05-cv-05809 Document #: 20-1 Filed: 04/13/21 Page 2 of 84 PageID #:551 I. BACKGROUND A. Defendant ExxonMobil Oil Corporation currently owns and operates petroleum refineries located near Joliet, Illinois and in Beaumont, Texas. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation also owned a petroleum refinery in Torrance, California, until it completed the sale of the Torrance Refinery to PBF Energy in 2016. Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation currently owns and operates petroleum refineries located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Baytown, Texas; and Billings, Montana. The six petroleum refineries identified above are referred to herein as the “Six Refineries” (as further defined at Section IV (Definitions) below). B. On October 11, 2005, Plaintiff the United States of America (“United States”), by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States, acting at the request and on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), filed the Complaint in this case alleging, inter alia, that the Defendants had violated and/or continued to violate certain requirements of the Clean Air Act at the Six Refineries, as well as regulations and permits issued under the Clean Air Act including: (i) New Source Performance Standard (“NSPS”) regulations promulgated by EPA; (ii) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”) regulations promulgated by EPA; and (iii) State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) and other state rules adopted by the states and/or local air quality districts in which the Six Refineries are located.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 565 Roadway Extension Project
    Final Environmental Assessment FM 565 Extension Project Beaumont District FM 565 (From Loop 207 to State Highway 146) CSJ: 1024-01-070 Chambers County, Texas May 2015 Environmental Assessment FM 565 Extension Project Table of Contents Mont Belvieu, Chambers County, Texas Table of Contents 1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Proposed Action ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Funding for the Proposed Action ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Need for the Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Purpose of the Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.6 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.7 Right-of-Way .............................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.8 Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations .................................................................................
    [Show full text]