DOCSLIB.ORG

Plan De Gestion 2018-2027 Tome 3 : Annexes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plan De Gestion 2018-2027 Tome 3 : Annexes Plan de gestion 2018-2027 Tome 3 : Annexes Rédaction : Anne WOLFF, Sébastien BARTHEL, 2018 Conservatoire d’espaces naturels Rhône-Alpes La Maison Forte 2 rue des Vallières 69390 Vourles 04 72 31 84 50 https://www.cen-rhonealpes.fr/ Nom du site RNR des jasseries de Colleigne Statut Réserve naturelle régionale Voir annexe 4 de la délibération n°09.08.606 du Règlement en vigueur Conseil régional de Rhône-Alpes (classement en RNR de la Réserve des jasseries de Colleigne) Localisation (communes) Sauvain Surface d’étude (concernée par le plan de gestion) 591 ha Surface classée en Réserve 285 ha Année du dernier classement 2009 Année de création 1985 (classement de 56 ha en RNV) Conservatoire d’espaces naturels Rhône-Alpes – M. Gestionnaire Sébastien BARTHEL Nombre de propriétaires 6 Sommaire Annexe 1 : Délibération de la commission permanente du Conseil régional concernant le classement de la RNR des jasseries de Colleigne ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Annexe 2 : Arrêté de désignation du gestionnaire................................................................................................ 33 Annexe 3 : Liste de la faune et de la flore observées sur le périmètre d’étude de la RNR ................................... 35 Annexe 4 : Tableau de budget prévisionnel .......................................................................................................... 49 1 2 Annexe 1 : Délibération de la commission permanente du Conseil régional concernant le classement de la RNR des jasseries de Colleigne 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Annexe 2 : Arrêté de désignation du gestionnaire 33 34 Annexe 3 : Liste de la faune et de la flore observées sur le périmètre d’étude de la RNR Année de Groupe Ordre Espèce dernière observation Plantes Apiales Angelica sylvestris L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Apiales Carum verticillatum (L.) W.D.J.Koch, 1824 2003 Plantes Apiales Chaerophyllum hirsutum L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Apiales Conopodium majus (Gouan) Loret, 1886 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Apiales Epikeros pyrenaeus (L.) Raf., 1840 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Apiales Meum athamanticum Jacq., 1776 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Apiales Selinum pyrenaeum (L.) Gouan, 1773 2003 Plantes Apiales Trocdaris verticillatum (L.) Raf., 1840 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Allium victorialis L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Anthericum liliago L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Convallaria majalis L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Dactylorhiza maculata (L.) Soó, 1962 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Maianthemum bifolium (L.) F.W.Schmidt, 1794 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Narcissus jonquilla L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Narcissus poeticus L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Asparagales Narcissus pseudonarcissus L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb., 1828 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Asparagales Polygonatum multiflorum (L.) All., 1785 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Polygonatum verticillatum (L.) All., 1785 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asparagales Pseudorchis albida (L.) A.Löve & D.Löve, 1969 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Asparagales Scilla sp. 2016 Plantes Asterales Achillea millefolium L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Asterales Adenostyles alliariae (Gouan) A.Kern., 1871 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Antennaria dioica (L.) Gaertn., 1791 (#ref) 2017 Plantes Asterales Arnica montana L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Asterales Cacalia alliariae Gouan, 1773 2003 Plantes Asterales Campanula lanceolata Lapeyr., 1813 2015 Plantes Asterales Centaurea jacea subsp. nigra (L.) Bonnier & Layens, 1894 2014 Plantes Asterales Centaurea montana L., 1753 2014 Plantes Asterales Centaurea nigra L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Asterales Cicerbita alpina (L.) Wallr., 1822 2016 Plantes Asterales Cicerbita plumieri (L.) Kirschl., 1852 2014 Plantes Asterales Cirsium erisithales (Jacq.) Scop., 1769 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Asterales Cirsium palustre (L.) Scop., 1772 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Crepis mollis (Jacq.) Asch., 1864 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Asterales Crepis paludosa (L.) Moench, 1794 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Doronicum austriacum Jacq., 1774 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Hieracium murorum L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Hieracium umbellatum L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Asterales Jasione laevis Lam., 1779 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Asterales Lactuca alpina (L.) Benth. & Hook.f., 1876 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Leontodon hispidus L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Asterales Leontodon pyrenaicus Gouan, 1773 2015 Plantes Asterales Leucanthemum vulgare Lam., 1779 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Asterales Menyanthes trifoliata L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Asterales Petasites albus (L.) Gaertn., 1791 (#ref) 2016 35 Plantes Asterales Phyteuma spicatum L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Prenanthes purpurea L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Scorzonera humilis L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Asterales Senecio cacaliaster Lam., 1779 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Asterales Senecio ovatus (P.Gaertn., B.Mey. & Scherb.) Willd., 1803 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Serratula tinctoria L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Asterales Serratula tinctoria var. vulpii (Fisch.-Oost.) Gremli, 1878 2003 Plantes Asterales Solidago virgaurea L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Asterales Taraxacum F.H.Wigg. 2014 Plantes Asterales Taraxacum officinale F.H.Wigg., 1780 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Boraginales Myosotis arvensis Hill, 1764 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Boraginales Myosotis lamottiana (Braun-Blanq.) Grau, 1970 2003 Plantes Boraginales Myosotis martini Sennen, 1926 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Boraginales Myosotis nemorosa Besser, 1821 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Boraginales Myosotis scorpioides L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Boraginales Pulmonaria sp. 2016 Plantes Brassicales Cardamine pratensis L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Caryophyllales Bistorta officinalis Delarbre, 1800 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Caryophyllales Cerastium fontanum Baumg., 1816 (#ref) 2015 Cerastium fontanum subsp. vulgare (Hartm.) Greuter & Burdet, Plantes Caryophyllales 2014 1982 (#ref) Plantes Caryophyllales Dianthus deltoides L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Caryophyllales Dianthus hyssopifolius L., 1755 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Caryophyllales Dianthus monspessulanus L., 1759 2014 Plantes Caryophyllales Dianthus sylvaticus Hoppe ex Willd., 1809 2015 Plantes Caryophyllales Drosera rotundifolia L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Caryophyllales Montia fontana L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Caryophyllales Rumex acetosa L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Caryophyllales Rumex acetosella L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Caryophyllales Rumex arifolius All., 1773 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Caryophyllales Silene dioica (L.) Clairv., 1811 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Caryophyllales Silene nutans L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Caryophyllales Stellaria graminea L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Caryophyllales Stellaria holostea L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Celastrales Parnassia palustris L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Cupressales Juniperus communis L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Dipsacales Knautia arvensis (L.) Coult., 1828 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Dipsacales Knautia arvernensis (Briq.) Szabó, 1934 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Dipsacales Knautia dipsacifolia (Host) Kreutzer, 1840 2003 Plantes Dipsacales Knautia foreziensis Chass. ex Szabó, 1934 2003 Plantes Dipsacales Lonicera nigra L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Dipsacales Lonicera periclymenum L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Dipsacales Succisa pratensis Moench, 1794 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Dipsacales Valeriana dioica L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Dipsacales Valeriana repens Host, 1827 2016 Plantes Dipsacales Valeriana tripteris L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Equisetales Equisetum palustre L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Equisetales Equisetum sylvaticum L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Ericales Andromeda polifolia L., 1753 (#ref) 2018 Plantes Ericales Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull, 1808 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Ericales Lysimachia nemorum L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Ericales Lysimachia nummularia L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 36 Plantes Ericales Pyrola minor L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Ericales Vaccinium microcarpum (Turcz. ex Rupr.) Schmalh., 1871 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Ericales Vaccinium myrtillus L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Ericales Vaccinium oxycoccos L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Ericales Vaccinium uliginosum L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Ericales Vaccinium vitis-idaea L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Fabales Cytisus oromediterraneus Rivas Mart. & al., 1984 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Fabales Genista pilosa L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Fabales Genista sagittalis L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Fabales Lathyrus linifolius (Reichard) Bässler, 1971 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Fabales Lathyrus pratensis L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Fabales Lotus corniculatus L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Fabales Lotus pedunculatus Cav., 1793 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Fabales Trifolium alpinum L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Fabales Trifolium pratense L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Fabales Trifolium repens L., 1753 (#ref) 2015 Plantes Fagales Betula pubescens Ehrh., 1791 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Fagales Corylus avellana L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Fagales Fagus sylvatica L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Gentianales Galium mollugo L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Gentianales Galium odoratum (L.) Scop., 1771 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Gentianales Galium palustre L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Gentianales Galium saxatile L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Gentianales Galium uliginosum L., 1753 (#ref) 2003 Plantes Gentianales Galium verum L., 1753 (#ref) 2014 Plantes Gentianales Gentiana lutea L., 1753 (#ref) 2016 Plantes Gentianales Gentiana pneumonanthe L., 1753 (#ref) 2003
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stace Edition 4: Changes
    STACE EDITION 4: CHANGES NOTES Changes to the textual content of keys and species accounts are not covered. "Mention" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment at the head of a family, family division or genus (just after the key if there is one). "Reference" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment inline in the accounts for a genus. "Account" implies that the taxon is or was given a numbered account inline in the numbered treatments within a genus. "Key" means key at species / infraspecific level unless otherwise qualified. "Added" against an account, mention or reference implies that no treatment was given in Edition 3. "Given" against an account, mention or reference implies that this replaces a less full or prominent treatment in Stace 3. “Reduced to” against an account or reference implies that this replaces a fuller or more prominent treatment in Stace 3. GENERAL Family order changed in the Malpighiales Family order changed in the Cornales Order Boraginales introduced, with families Hydrophyllaceae and Boraginaceae Family order changed in the Lamiales BY FAMILY 1 LYCOPODIACEAE 4 DIPHASIASTRUM Key added. D. complanatum => D. x issleri D. tristachyum keyed and account added. 5 EQUISETACEAE 1 EQUISETUM Key expanded. E. x meridionale added to key and given account. 7 HYMENOPHYLLACEAE 1 HYMENOPHYLLUM H. x scopulorum given reference. 11 DENNSTAEDTIACEAE 2 HYPOLEPIS added. Genus account added. Issue 7: 26 December 2019 Page 1 of 35 Stace edition 4 changes H. ambigua: account added. 13 CYSTOPTERIDACEAE Takes on Gymnocarpium, Cystopteris from Woodsiaceae. 2 CYSTOPTERIS C. fragilis ssp. fragilis: account added.
    [Show full text]
  • Classificatie Van Planten – Nieuwe Inzichten En Gevolgen Voor De Praktijk
    B268_dendro_bin 03-11-2009 10:32 Pagina 4 Classificatie van planten – nieuwe inzichten en gevolgen voor de praktijk Ir. M.H.A. Hoffman Er zijn ongeveer 300.000 verschillende (hogere) plantensoorten, die onderling veel of weinig op elkaar lijken. Vroeger werden alle planten- soorten afzonderlijk benaamd, en was niet duidelijk hoe deze soorten ver- want waren. Tegenwoordig worden soorten conform het systeem van Lin- naeus ingedeeld in geslachten. Soorten die sterk verwant zijn aan elkaar hebben dezelfde geslachtsnaam. Geslachten worden op hun beurt weer ingedeeld in families en die op hun beurt weer in ordes, enzovoort. Op deze manier kent het plantenrijk een hiërarchisch indelingsysteem, met verwantschap als basis. Sterke verwantschap is meestal ook zicht- baar aan de uiterlijke gelijkenis. Soorten die veel op elkaar lijken en verwant zijn zitten in dezelfde groep.Verre verwanten zitten ver uit elkaar in het systeem. Om een plant goed te kunnen benamen, moet dus eerst uitgezocht worden aan welke andere soorten deze verwant is. Tot voor kort werd de gelijkenis van planten zen. Deze nieuwe ontwikkeling is van grote voornamelijk bepaald aan uiterlijke kenmerken invloed op de taxonomie en op het classificatie- van bijvoorbeeld bloem en blad. De afgelopen systeem van het plantenrijk. Dit heeft bijvoor- decennia kwamen daar al aanvullende criteria beeld invloed op de familie-indeling en de plaats zoals houtanatomie, pollenmorfologie, chemi- van de familie in het systeem. Maar ook op sche inhoudsstoffen en chromosoomaantallen geslachts- en soortniveau zijn er de nodige ver- bij. De afgelopen jaren hebben DNA-technie- schuivingen. Dit artikel gaat in op de ontstaans- ken een grote vlucht genomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Virulence Potential and in Vivo Toxicity of Persicaria Maculosa and Bistorta Officinalis Extracts
    molecules Article Anti-Virulence Potential and In Vivo Toxicity of Persicaria maculosa and Bistorta officinalis Extracts Marina Jovanovi´c 1,2,*, Ivana Mori´c 3, Biljana Nikoli´c 1 , Aleksandar Pavi´c 3, Emilija Svirˇcev 4 , Lidija Šenerovi´c 3 and Dragana Miti´c-Culafi´c´ 1 1 Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (B.N.); [email protected] (D.M.-C.)´ 2 Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, Studentski trg 12/V, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, 11042 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (I.M.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (L.Š.) 4 Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Dositeja Obradovi´ca2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +381-63-74-43-004 Received: 21 March 2020; Accepted: 13 April 2020; Published: 15 April 2020 Abstract: Many traditional remedies represent potential candidates for integration with modern medical practice, but credible data on their activities are often scarce. For the first time, the anti-virulence potential and the safety for human use of the ethanol extracts of two medicinal plants, Persicaria maculosa (PEM) and Bistorta officinalis (BIO), have been addressed. Ethanol extracts of both plants exhibited anti-virulence activity against the medically important opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At the subinhibitory concentration of 50 µg/mL, the extracts demonstrated a maximal inhibitory effect (approx. 50%) against biofilm formation, the highest reduction of pyocyanin production (47% for PEM and 59% for BIO) and completely halted the swarming motility of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Achillea Millefolium Common Yarrow
    Top 50 Medicinal Plants Medicinal plants to create an Apothecary-style garden to help our pollinators List Curated by Thomas McBride From research data collected and collated at the National Botanic Garden of Wales NB: Butterflies and Moths are not studied at the NBGW so any data on nectar plants beneficial for them is taken from Butterfly Conservation Introduction At the National Botanic Garden of Wales, we feel it is important to recognise the rich history of botany and plant science we have in Wales and around the UK. One such way to display this is through a living museum of plants once used, and some still used, to treat various ailments and maintain good health. These medicinal plants can be grown together to create a physic garden or apothecaries garden; such as the one we have here. Apothecaries were herbal medicine specialists before the event of modern medicine. The apothecaries garden is split into sections depending on the usage of the plants. If you would also like to create one, you can use this model to help you. Almost all the selected plants are found in our Apothecaries Garden and many are also culinary herbs or ornamentals found elsewhere in the garden. Most of the plants used are native to or naturalised in Western Europe. Garden The Apothecaries The Apothecaries Garden Muscular-Skeletal Digestive Ear, Nose & Throat Nervous Glandular Circulatory Urinary Welsh Natives Cutaneous (Skin) (Used by local Apothecaries) The Circulatory System The Respiratory System The Circulatory system comprises The Respiratory system comprises the Lungs, the Heart, blood and blood vessels; Trachea (Windpipe) and connects directly to arteries, veins and capillaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Switzerland - Alpine Flowers of the Upper Engadine
    Switzerland - Alpine Flowers of the Upper Engadine Naturetrek Tour Report 7 - 14 July 2019 Androsace alpina Gentiana verna Onobrychis montana Val Minor Report & Images by David Tattersfield Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Switzerland - Alpine Flowers of the Upper Engadine Tour participants: David Tattersfield (leader) with 15 Naturetrek clients. Day 1 Sunday 7th July The British Airways flight from Heathrow arrived an hour late, in Zurich. Once we had assembled, we caught the train to Zurich main station, where we changed to the intercity express. We passed Lake Zurich and the Walensee, meeting the Rhine as it flows into Liectenstein, and then changed to the UNESCO World Heritage Albula railway at Chur. Dramatic scenery and many loops, tunnels and bridges followed, as we made our way through the Alps. After passing through the long Preda tunnel, we entered the Engadine and made a third change, at Samedan, for the short ride to Pontresina. We were picked up by the hotel minibus and arrived at the hotel around 9.00 pm. After a delicious evening meal, we briefly talked over the plans for the week and retired for much-needed sleep. Day 2 Monday 8th July After a 20-minute walk from the hotel, we caught the 9.07am train, at Surovas. We had a scenic introduction to the geography of the region, as we travelled south along the length of Val Bernina, crossing the watershed, beside Lago Bianco, and alighting at Alp Grum.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research
    Trop J Nat Prod Res, January 2021; 5(1):16-48 ISSN 2616-0684 (Print) ISSN 2616-0692 (Electronic) Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research Available online at https://www.tjnpr.org Review Article Evidence-Based Potential of some Edible, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants as Safe Cosmetics and Cosmeceuticals Bassam I. Amro1, Maha N. Abu Hajleh2, Fatma Afifi3* 1Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan 2Department of Cosmetic Science, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman- Jordan 3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: According to complementary and alternative medicine which is based primarily on traditional or Received 05 November 2020 folkloric medicines of different world civilizations there is a constant growing interest on Revised 24 December 2020 cosmetics and cosmeceuticals using botanical ingredients. Since ancient times, humans used Accepted 03 February 2021 distinctive natural ingredients as medicine or cosmetic products. Cosmetics alone are not Published online 03 February 2021 sufficient for skin care. Active ingredients from natural or synthetic sources have been added to prevent and/or to treat damaged and ageing of the skin. Herbal cosmetics are more prevalent than synthetic ones. Since synthetic cosmetic products may cause severe skin damage, natural herbs are included directly in the skin care formulations. Usually plant based cosmetics are made using plants well known throughout history to be safe and side-effects free. Aromatic plants and Copyright: © 2021 Amro et al. This is an open- fixed oils were mostly used by different civilizations in religious rituals, and for the care, access article distributed under the terms of the cleansing and decoration of the skin to enhance beauty and to promote good health.
    [Show full text]
  • Detail Bistorta Officinalis 8. 8. 2021
    Dump from Pladias.cz portal 22.9.2021 Bistorta officinalis Distribution Habitus and growth type Height [m]: 0.3–0.8 Growth form: clonal herb Life form: geophyte Life strategy: CS – competitor/stress-tolerator Life strategy (Pierce method based on leaf traits): C/CR Life strategy (Pierce method, C-score): 76 % Life strategy (Pierce method, S-score): 0 % Life strategy (Pierce method, R-score): 24 % Leaf Leaf presence and metamorphosis: leaves present, not modified Leaf arrangement (phyllotaxis): alternate Leaf shape: simple – entire Stipules: present Petiole: both present and absent Leaf life span: summer green Leaf anatomy: mesomorphic, helomorphic Flower Flowering period [month]: May-August © 2014–2021 Pladias – Citation: Pladias – Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation. www.pladias.cz Dump from Pladias.cz portal 22.9.2021 Flowering phase: 6 Cornus sanguinea-Melica uniflora (start of early summer) Flower colour: pink Flower symmetry: actinomorphic Perianth type: homochlamydeous Perianth fusion: fused Shape of the sympetalous corolla or syntepalous perianth: tubular Inflorescence type: pseudospica Dicliny: synoecious, gynomonoecious, gynodioecious Pollination syndrome: insect-pollination, geitonogamy Fruit, seed and dispersal Fruit type: dry fruit – achene/cypsela/samara Fruit colour: brown Reproduction type: by seed/spores and vegetatively Dispersal unit (diaspore): fruit, infrutescence or its part Dispersal strategy: Allium (mainly autochory) Myrmecochory: probably non-myrmecochorous Belowground organs and clonality Shoot metamorphosis:
    [Show full text]
  • Kent-Botany-2019.Pdf
    0 1 Kent Botany 2019 Contents Page Introduction 1 Corrections to Kent Botany 2018 8 Plant records: selection criteria and recorders 8 Plant records for East Kent (vice county 15) 10 Plant records for West Kent (vice county 16) 27 References 35 Compiled by Geoffrey Kitchener (January 2020, web version 1) Front cover: Raphanus raphanistrum subsp. maritimus R (Sea Radish) at Minster (Sheppey). Photo 4 July 2019, © Lliam Rooney Introduction Kent Botany 2019 is the tenth report in the Kent Botany series, reporting on current botanical developments in the county. It represents a significant milestone, as 2019 brings to an end ten seasons of recording by the Kent Botanical Recording Group, founded in March 2010. It is also the end of the Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland’s (BSBI) date class 2010-19, a ten-year period for the assemblage of records which may be compared with previous ten-year date classes, to identify trends in the distribution of our flora. In addition, it is the end of the BSBI’s Atlas 2020 project, which seeks to map the current status of the British and Irish flora, following up the last mapping (Preston et al., 2002), twenty years before. This report is issued primarily as a web version, maintained on the Kent page of the BSBI website, https://bsbi.org/kent, and this should be regarded as the definitive version. The text, substantially the same, is also published as hard copy within the Kent Field Club (KFC) Bulletin. Highlights Highlights for 2019 included the following: Juncus ranarius (Frog Rush) has been restored to the Kent flora, with the discovery of a population at Crossness; Juncus x surrejanus (J.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Australia's Grazing Industries by Garden
    final report Project Code: NBP.357 Prepared by: Jenny Barker, Rod Randall,Tony Grice Co-operative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management Date published: May 2006 ISBN: 1 74036 781 2 PUBLISHED BY Meat and Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Abstract This report identifies 281 introduced garden plants and 800 lower priority species that present a significant risk to Australia’s grazing industries should they naturalise. Of the 281 species: • Nearly all have been recorded overseas as agricultural or environmental weeds (or both); • More than one tenth (11%) have been recorded as noxious weeds overseas; • At least one third (33%) are toxic and may harm or even kill livestock; • Almost all have been commercially available in Australia in the last 20 years; • Over two thirds (70%) were still available from Australian nurseries in 2004; • Over two thirds (72%) are not currently recognised as weeds under either State or Commonwealth legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heracleum Mantegazzianum) This Page Intentionally Left Blank ECOLOGY and MANAGEMENT of GIANT HOGWEED (Heracleum Mantegazzianum
    ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF GIANT HOGWEED (Heracleum mantegazzianum) This page intentionally left blank ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF GIANT HOGWEED (Heracleum mantegazzianum) Edited by P. Pys˘ek Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Institute of Botany, Pru˚honice, Czech Republic M.J.W. Cock CABI Switzerland Centre Delémont, Switzerland W. Nentwig Community Ecology, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland H.P. Ravn Forest and Landscape, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Hørsholm, Denmark CABI is a trading name of CAB International CAB International Head Office CABI North American Office Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © CABI 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress, Washington, DC. ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 206 0 Typeset by MRM Graphics Ltd, Winslow, Bucks. Printed and bound in the UK by Athenaeum Press, Gateshead. Contents Contributors ix Acknowledgement xiii Preface: All You Ever Wanted to Know About Hogweed, but xv Were Afraid to Ask! David M. Richardson 1 Taxonomy, Identification, Genetic Relationships and 1 Distribution of Large Heracleum Species in Europe S˘árka Jahodová, Lars Fröberg, Petr Pys˘ek, Dmitry Geltman, Sviatlana Trybush and Angela Karp 2 Heracleum mantegazzianum in its Primary Distribution 20 Range of the Western Greater Caucasus Annette Otte, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Pladias Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation
    Preslia 93: 1–87, 2021 1 Pladias Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation Pladias – databáze české flóry a vegetace Milan Chytrý1, Jiří Danihelka1,2, Zdeněk Kaplan2,3, Jan Wild2, Dana Holubová1, Petr Novotný4, Marcela Řezníčková1, Martin Rohn5,PavelDřevojan1, Vít Grulich1, Jitka Klimešová3,6,JanLepš7, Zdeňka Lososová1,JanPergl2, Jiří Sádlo2, Petr Šmarda1, Petra Štěpánková1, Lubomír Tichý1, Irena Axmanová1, Alena Bartušková6,Petr Blažek7, Jindřich Chrtek Jr.2, Felícia M. Fischer1,Wen-YongGuo2,8, Tomáš Herben2,3, Zdeněk Janovský2,3, Marie Konečná7, Ingolf Kühn9, Lenka Moravcová2, Petr Petřík2, Simon Pierce10, Karel Prach7, Helena Prokešová1,11, Milan Štech7, Jakub Těšitel1, Tamara Těšitelová12, Martin Večeřa1, David Zelený13 & Petr Pyšek2,14 1Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlář- ská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], grulich@ sci.muni.cz; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], tesitel@ sci.muni.cz, [email protected]; 2Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sci- ences, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected], jan.wild@ ibot.cas.cz, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], herben@ site.cas.cz, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; 3Depart- ment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská
    [Show full text]
  • SG17 2 Sumpich Final.Indd
    Silva Gabreta vol. 17 (2-3) p. 83–132 Vimperk, 2011 Buterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) of the Blanice National Nature Monument (Bohemian Forest, Czech Republic) Jan Šumpich CZ-58261 Česká Bělá 212, Czech Republic [email protected] Abstract This paper summarises data on butterflies and moths occurring in the Blanice National Nature Monument (NNM) including its buffer zone (Bohemian Forest, Šumava Protected Landscape Area, southern Bohe- mia). Most of the presented data were gathered during surveys carried out by the author in 2008–2009. Further data, spanning the period 1972–2009, were kindly provided by other lepidopterologists. In addition, all published data have also been included in the study. In 2008 the author focused mainly on wetland habitats in the Blanice River floodplain, moving in 2009 to mountain coniferous forests in the NNM’s buffer zone. In total, 710 moth species are presented in the paper together with phenological data, where known, and the exact location of their records. Predominant habitat types are characterized by the lepidop- teran communities recorded therein. High species diversity was observed in wetland habitats near the Blanice River and the occurrence of many typical wetland species was confirmed there, e.g., Sterrhopterix standfussi (Wocke, 1851), Epermenia falciformis (Haworth, 1828), Orthonama vittata (Borkhausen, 1794), or Hypenodes humidalis Doubleday, 1850. Species-rich lepidopteran fauna of mountain forests in the buff- er zone were typified by Nemapogon picarellus (Clerck, 1759), Ypsolopha nemorella (Linnaeus, 1758), Anchinia daphnella (Dennis & Schiffermüller, 1775), Caryocolum klosi (Rebel, 1917), C. cassellum (Walk- er, 1864), Epinotia pusillana (Peyerimhoff, 1863), Elophos vittarius (Thunberg, 1788), Entephria infidaria (La Harpe, 1853), Perizoma taeniatum (Stephens, 1831), Phlogophora scita (Hübner, 1790), or Xestia colli- na (Boisduval, 1840).
    [Show full text]