Report of the Human Rights Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Human Rights Committee A/57/40 (Vol. II) United Nations Report of the Human Rights Committee Volume II General Assembly Official Records Fifty-seventh Session Supplement No. 40 (A/57/40) A/57/40 (Vol. II) General Assembly Official Records Fifty-seventh Session Supplement No. 40 (A/57/40) Report of the Human Rights Committee Volume II United Nations New York, 2002 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. ISSN 0255-2353 - 3 - CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Executive summary Chapter I. JURISDICTION AND ACTIVITIES A. States parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights B. Sessions of the Committee C. Attendance of sessions D. Election of officers E. Special rapporteurs F. Working groups G. Question of honoraria of Committee members H. Related United Nations human rights activities I. Meeting with States parties J. Derogations pursuant to article 4 of the Covenant K. General Comment under article 40, paragraph 4, of the Covenant L. Staff resources M. Publicity for the work of the Committee N. Documents and publications relating to the work of the Committee O. Future meetings of the Committee P. Adoption of the report GE.02-44849 (E) 051102 281102 - 4 - CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Paragraphs Page II. METHODS OF WORK OF THE COMMITTEE UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT: NEW DEVELOPMENTS A. Recent developments and decisions on procedures B. Concluding observations C. Links to other human rights treaties and treaty bodies D. Cooperation with other United Nations bodies III. SUBMISSION OF REPORTS BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT A. Reports submitted to the Secretary-General from August 2001 to July 2002 B. Overdue reports and non-compliance by States parties with their obligations under article 40 IV. CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT 1. Ukraine 2. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Overseas Territories 3. Switzerland 4. Azerbaijan 5. Georgia 6. Sweden 7. Hungary 8. New Zealand - 5 - CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Paragraphs Page IV. (cont’d) 9. Viet Nam 10. Yemen 11. Moldova V. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATIONS UNDER THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL A. Progress of work B. Growth of the Committee’s caseload under the Optional Protocol C. Approaches to considering communications under the Optional Protocol D. Individual opinions E. Issues considered by the Committee F. Remedies called for under the Committee’s Views VI. FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES UNDER THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL Annexes I. STATES PARTIES TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS AND TO THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOLS AND STATES WHICH HAVE MADE THE DECLARATION UNDER ARTICLE 41 OF THE COVENANT AS AT 26 JULY 2002 A. States parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights B. States parties to the Optional Protocol - 6 - CONTENTS (continued) Annexes Page I. (cont’d) C. States parties to the Second Optional Protocol, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty D. States which have made the declaration under article 41 of the Covenant II. MEMBERSHIP AND OFFICES OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, 2001-2002 A. Membership of the Human Rights Committee B. Officers III. A. FOLLOW-UP TO CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE ON 21 MARCH 2002 B. DECISIONS ON WORKING METHODS ADOPTED BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE ON 5 APRIL 2002 IV. SUBMISSION OF REPORTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT V. STATUS OF REPORTS CONSIDERED DURING THE PERIOD UNDER REVIEW AND OF REPORTS STILL PENDING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE VI. GENERAL COMMENT UNDER ARTICLE 40, PARAGRAPH 4, OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS GENERAL COMMENT NO. 30 [75] ON REPORTING OBLIGATIONS OF STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT VII. LIST OF STATES PARTIES’ DELEGATIONS THAT PARTICIPATED IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE REPORTS BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE AT ITS SEVENTY-THIRD, SEVENTY-FOURTH AND SEVENTY-FIFTH SESSIONS VIII. LIST OF DOCUMENTS ISSUED DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD - 7 - CONTENTS (continued) Annexes Page IX. VIEWS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE UNDER ARTICLE 5, PARAGRAPH 4, OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS ........................................................................................ 12 A. Communication No. 580/1994, Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 21 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 12 B. Communication No. 641/1995, Gedumbe v. Democratic Republic of the Congo (Views adopted on 9 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ........... 24 C. Communication No. 667/1995, Ricketts v. Jamaica (Views adopted on 4 April 2002, seventy-fourth session) .......................... 29 Appendix D. Communication No. 677/1996, Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 1 April 2002, seventy-fourth session) ......................... 36 Appendix E. Communication No. 678/1996, Gutierrez Vicanco v. Peru (Views adopted on 26 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 46 Appendix F. Communication No. 683/1996, Wanza v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 26 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 55 G. Communication No. 684/1996, Sahadath v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 2 April 2002, seventy-fourth session) .......................... 61 H. Communication No. 695/1996, Simpson v. Jamaica (Views adopted on 31 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 67 I. Communication No. 721/1997, Boodoo v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 2 August 2002, seventy-fourth session) ...................... 76 J. Communication No. 728/1996, Sahadeo v. Guyana (Views adopted on 1 November 2001, seventy-third session) ................... 81 Appendix - 8 - CONTENTS (continued) Page Annexes IX. (cont’d) K. Communication No. 747/1997, Des Fours v. The Czech Republic (Views adopted on 30 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 88 L. Communication No. 763/1997, Lantsova v. Russia (Views adopted on 26 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 96 M. Communication No. 765/1997, Fábryová v. The Czech Republic (Views adopted on 30 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 103 Appendix N. Communication No. 774/1997, Brok v. The Czech Republic (Views adopted on 31 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 110 O. Communication No. 779/1997, Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v. Finland (Views adopted on 24 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 117 Appendix P. Communication No. 788/1997, Cagas v. The Philippines (Views adopted on 23 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 131 Appendix Q. Communication No. 792/1998, Higginson v. Jamaica (Views adopted on 28 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 140 R. Communication No. 794/1998, Jalloh v. The Netherlands (Views adopted on 23 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 144 S. Communication No. 802/1998, Rogerson v. Australia (Views adopted on 3 April 2002, seventy-fourth session) ......................... 150 T. Communication No. 845/1998, Kennedy v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 26 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 161 Appendix - 9 - CONTENTS (continued) Page Annexes IX. (cont’d) U. Communication No. 848/1999, Rodríguez Orejuela v. Colombia (Views adopted on 23 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 172 V. Communication No. 854/1999, Wackenheim v. France (Views adopted on 15 July 2002, seventy-fifth session)............................. 179 W. Communication No. 859/1999, Jiménez Vaca v. Colombia (Views adopted on 25 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ...................... 187 X. Communication No. 865/1999, Marín Gómez v. Spain (Views adopted on 22 October 2001, seventy-third session) ...................... 198 Appendix Y. Communication No. 899/1999, Francis et al. v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 25 July 2002, seventy-fifth session)............................. 206 Appendix Z. Communication No. 902/1999, Joslin v. New Zealand (Views adopted on 17 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 214 Appendix AA. Communication No. 906/2000, Chira Vargas v. Peru (Views adopted on 22 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 228 BB. Communication No. 916/2000, Jayawardena v. Sri Lanka (Views adopted on 22 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 234 Appendix CC. Communication No. 919/2000, Müller and Engelhard v. Namibia (Views adopted on 26 March 2002, seventy-fourth session) ..................... 243 - 10 - CONTENTS (continued) Page Annexes IX. (cont’d) DD. Communication No. 921/2000, Dergachev v. Belarus (Views adopted on 2 April 2002, seventy-fourth session) ......................... 252 EE. Communication No. 923/2000, Mátyus v. Slovakia (Views adopted on 22 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 257 FF. Communication No. 928/2000, Boodlal Sooklal v. Trinidad and Tobago (Views adopted on 25 October 2001, seventy-third session) ..................... 264 GG. Communication No. 932/2000, Gillot v. France (Views adopted on 15 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 270 HH. Communication No. 946/2000, Patera v. The Czech Republic (Views adopted on 25 July 2002, seventy-fifth session) ............................ 294 Appendix II. Communication No. 965/2000,
Recommended publications
  • Police Brawn Blamed for Riot at Agrapatana by JAYAKODY RATNAYAKE, Our Nuwara Eliya Corr
    Vol. 30 No. 214 Tuesday 26th July, 2011, 44 pages Rs. 20 Registered in Sri Lanka as a Newspaper - Late City Edition ECONOMISTIC SRI LANKA THESIS INVALIDATED ENGLAND TAKE SERIES EXPANDS ACREAGE AT NORTHERN LEAD AFTER LORD’S WIN UNDER RUBBER 10 ELECTIONS 12 16 While America mulls ban on aid to SL US multi-nationals lobby their govt. to do business with Lanka Boeing, Coca Cola campaigners Close on the heels of a US House Foreign Affairs Committee decision that American aid to Sri Lanka should be banned, some of the biggest American multi-nationals have written to the US government explaining their intention to form a Coalition for US-Sri Lanka Business to promote commercial activi- ties here stating that it “will generate substantial benefits to both countries, including additional America jobs A Hindu devotee hangs from hooks while carrying a child in fulfillment of a vow at the resulting from increased exports across Arulmigu Siva Subramaniam Sivam Kovil in Slave Island yesterday (25). A large number of a number of US industries. “ Hindu devotees participated in this annual ceremony. (Pic. by Kamal Bogoda). Members of the Coalition, including giant aircraft manufacturer Boeing and the world’s leading beverage maker Coca Cola, have told US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, Commerce Final decision on aid cut now Secretary Gary Locke and US Trade Representative Ron Kirk that they have already “taken significant steps towards with Senate and Congress doing business in Sri Lanka” and “look forward to working with you to find The final decision on the aid cut to Sri address accountability issues, ensures ways to enhance our nation’s commer- Lanka has to be approved by the Senate media freedom and withdraws emergency cial partnership with Sri Lanka”.
    [Show full text]
  • State Electronic Media During the Parliamentary Elections of October 2000
    REPORT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE NON- STATE ELECTRONIC MEDIA DURING THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS OF OCTOBER 2000 Preface This Report on the Performance of the Non- State Electronic Media During the Parliamentary Elections of October 2000 is the counterpart of the Report by INFORM on The Publicly Funded Electronic Media. The Reports were prepared in collaboration with Article 19 and with the generous assistance of NORAD, The Asia Foundation and the Royal Netherlands Embassy. The issue of media performance at the time of elections is an extremely pertinent one for a variety of reasons. Of especial importance is the division within Sri Lanka between state and non-state media and the impact this has on the performance of the media during election time. Issues of agenda setting, partisan bias and stereotype invariably surface and in turn confirm that partisan allegiance characterizes media in Sri Lankan irrespective of type of ownership and management. Consequently, the role of the media in helping citizens to make informed choices at elections is seriously diminished and the need for greater professionalism in the media reinforced. This Report highlights these issues through an analysis of election reportage. It concludes with a set of recommendations which have been classified into the mandatory and the voluntary. CPA believes that the issue of media reportage at election times is integral to strengthening the institutions of a functioning democracy in Sri Lanka and of fundamental importance in enhancing the contribution of civil society to better governance. This Report, its conclusions and recommendations are presented in this spirit and in the hope that electronic media reportage at election time can develop in the near future, into an example of media best practice in Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) MEETINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES 121st Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union 1. Opening of the Assembly ....................................................................................................... 4 2. Participation .......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Choice of an emergency item ................................................................................................ 5 4. Debates and decisions of the Assembly and of the IPU Committee on United Nations Affairs .. 5 185th Session of the Governing Council 1. Membership of the Inter-Parliamentary Union ........................................................................ 9 2. Financial situation of the IPU ................................................................................................. 9 3. Programme and budget for 2010 ........................................................................................... 9 4. Cooperation with the United Nations system ......................................................................... 10 5. Consolidation of the reform of the IPU …………………….. ................................................... 10 6. Preparation of the 3rd World Conference of Speakers of Parliament.......................................... 11 7. Recent conferences and specialized meetings ........................................................................ 11 8. Reports of plenary bodies and specialized committees ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka – LKA37855 – UNP – Elections – Shiral Laktilleke
    Country Advice Sri Lanka Sri Lanka – LKA37855 – UNP – Elections – Shiral Laktilleke 10 January 2011 1. I have read Sri Lanka – LKA37498 – United National Party – of 21 October 2010. Can you please advise whether, other than the above information, there have been any further reports of the targeting of UNP members and supporters by the current Sri Lankan government and security forces in 2010? RRT Country Advice LKA37498 referred to above is attached.1 Further to the information mentioned above, a report dated 8 December 2010 refers to government parliamentarians trying to manhandle UNP MP Jayalath Jayawardena in the parliamentary chamber during the previous week.2 Several government MPs were reported to have “accused Dr. Jayawardene of inciting diaspora and allegedly attempted to manhandle him. Government MPs were heard calling the UNP MP a „traitor,‟ „Tiger‟ and „murderer.‟” On 7 December 2010, a resolution signed by 78 ruling United People‟s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) parliamentarians which requested parliament to appoint a select committee to investigate Jayawardane‟s conduct was handed to the Speaker.3 The government said Jayawardane helped to organise protests against Sri Lanka‟s President Rajapaksa in Britain, which Jayawardane has denied. The Oxford Union had cancelled a planned speech by Mr Rajapaksa, saying large demonstrations planned against him would have posed security problems.4 The government also planned to bring a no-confidence motion against the deputy leader of the UNP, Karu Jayasuriya, after he made a “statement that alleged war crimes in the country should be probed.”5 In October 2010, the UNP claimed that UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake had been arrested “on false and fabricated charges” after he was granted bail “on charges of having fraudulently obtained Rs.1,000,000 from a female teacher on the promise of marrying her.” UNP deputy leader Karu Jayasuriya alleged that there was no evidence of cheating in Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • UNP in Fresh Crisis As Karu J Moves Against
    Amb Dhanapala before Lessons Learnt Com today Former Peace Secretariat Chief Ambassador Jayantha Dhanapala will testify at Jayantha the Lessons Learnt and Commission todayReconciliation at 2 pm. He was pre- Lessons Learnt Commission: ceded by two Peace Secretariat Chiefs, Ambassador Bernard Goonetilike and Rajiva supports Professor Rajiva Wijesinha. post-war role for military Vol. 29 No. 239 Wednesday 25th August, 2010, 44 pages Rs. 20 Registered in Sri Lanka as a Newspaper - First Edition BY SHAMINDRA FERDINANDO Elders: Answering a Former Peace call to relish carrion The Union Hostel Secretariat Chief UPFA 8 MP Professor Rajiva of the University Wijesinha says a liaison comfort between the military Page 8-9 Page 7 and civilian adminis- e flies, a Pakistan floods: 10 A sho ... a British public ‘shaming of Ceylon ks leader duc tration is needed. MP ? world politicians’ with SL assess rn trend is bo £29m donations performances after Rajiva Wijesinha says there is Page 15 German doctor absolutely nothing wanted for wrong in the military playing a role in manslaughter 16 earning slot in final accused of drugging and re-building of the Northern and Eastern raping women Wednesday August 25th, 2010 UNP in fresh crisis as Karu J moves Provinces. Australian Government forces finished off the PM could be LTTE on the banks of the Nanthikadal decided by lagoon May last year. Since then they against ‘a common and ruthless enemy’ have been engaged in a massive effort to Queen’s resettle, rehabilitate and reconstruct representative BY SHAMINDRA FERDINANDO war devastated areas. ustralia is facing a A fresh crisis is developing constitutional stand- Aoff and the contest for in the UNP with its Deputy Responding to a query by Chandi who runs the country may finally have to be decided by Chanmugam, a member of the Lessons the Queen’s representative, Leader Karu Jayasuriya taking the Governor-General.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranil Sends Envoy to Brief Navanetham and Antonio Guterress
    Late City Edition 4 Thursday 15th October, 2009 The Island More News Page Four On IDPs’ distress, extra judicial killings, arbitrary arrests and lack of press freedom GL discusses expansion of Ranil sends envoy to brief Navanetham trade with and Antonio Guterress Netherlands eader of the Opposition Ranil Sri Lanka, about of rights of the people laration confirming that Dr. Wickremesinghe has nominated the pathetic situa- of Sri Lanka, includ- Jayawardana’s fundamental rights have LDr. Jayalath Jayawardena as his tion of Sri Lankan ing the Opposition been violated. Dr. Jayawardana com- special envoy to brief UN High internally displaced Members of mands recognition from the internation- Commissioner for Human Rights Ms persons, detained in Parliament, with al human rights and humanitarian Navanetham Pillai, and UN High camps in the north- both local and inter- agencies, and the Members of Commissioner for Refugees Antonio ern part of Sri national authorities. Parliament all over the world, for his Guterress on the pathetic situation of Lanka. “Dr. tireless, consistent human rights and Sri Lanka’s Internally Displaced “Dr. Jayalath Jayawardana’s com- humanitarian activities.” Persons detained in camps in the north- Jayawardana has plaint to the UN Wickremesinghe states that Dr. ern part of Sri Lanka. been drawing his Human Rights Jayawardana would on his behalf pres- Prof. G. L. Peiris with Mrs. Maria In a letter addressed to the UN offi- special attention to Commission under ent them with the latest developments Vander Hoeven, the Dutch Minister Ranil Jayalath cials he had stated: the people of the the Covenant on including the pathetic situation of the of Economic Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka's Vernacular Press and the Peace Process
    SRI LANKA’S VERNACULAR PRESS AND THE PEACE PROCESS Part of the Sri Lanka Strategic Conflict Assessment 2005 S R I 2000 – 2005 L A N K A ’ S V E R N A C U L A R P R E S S A N D T H E P E A C E P R O Award winning photographs by Annuruddha Lokuhapuarachchi, Dominic Sansoni and Gemunu Amarasinghe C E S S 2000 – 2005 Suthaharan Nadarajah VOLUME N.0 6 SERIES SIX - PART SRI LANKA'S VERNACULAR PRESS AND THE PEACE PROCESS PART OF THE SRI LANKA STRATEGIC CONFLICT ASSESSMENT 2005 By Suthaharan Nadarajah The governments of the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, in collaboration with The Asia Foundation and the World Bank funded this project. The contents of the studies should not be construed as reflecting the views of the five funding agencies. © Copyright 2005 Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency The Asia Foundation Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland World Bank For reproductions of this publication please contact: 3 1/A Rajakeeya Mawatha Colombo 7, Sri Lanka Phone: +94 11 2698356 Fax: +94 11 2698358 www.asiafoundation.org All rights reserved Printed in Sri Lanka 1 | Contents Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................. | 2 About the Authors................................................................................................................................................. | 3 Acronyms..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Karu J Told Go Before LLRC with Evidence
    The Island Home News Wednesday 8th December, 2010 3 DEVELOPMENT FORTUNE JATHIKA Draw No: 1249 MAHAJANA VASANA JAYODA SATURDAY JAYAVIRU SUPIRI VASANA Date 07-12-2010 SAMPATHA JANA JAYA Main Draw SAMPATHA FORTUNE SAMPATHA GOVI SETHA Date:11-11-2010 Draw No: 78 Date:1-12-2010 SAMPATHA Zodiac - Libra Date: 07-12 - 2010 Date 16-10-2010 Date: 04-12-2010 Date: 02-12-2010 Date:14-10-2010 Date: 14-11-2010 Winning Nos: Draw No. 698 Date 1-12-2010 Draw No. 539 13 - 20 - 26 - 55 Draw No. 578 Draw No. 846 Draw No. 775 Super No. 11 Draw No. 2328 Bonus No 29 Lucky No. 01 Second Chance Winning Nos: Winning Nos : Super No. 21 Zodiac symbol - Scorpio Winning No: Winning No: Bonus No. 55 D-15-21-33-52 14 - 52 - 59 - 64 Winning Nos: W-10-36-46-67 Winning Nos: B-03-08-27-53 21-25-58-70 Y -12-44-59- 64 06 - 24- 25 - 45 W-9-5-7-5-7-7 U- 10- 27- 45- 67 E-1-5-3-2-1 Karu J told go before GL refutes Opposition claim British Embassy LLRC with evidence pulling out BY SAMAN INDRAJITH BY SAMAN INDRAJITH he government yesterday asked UNP Deputy Leader the motherland cannot be approved. The statement which Karu Jayasuriya to go before the Lessons Learnt and appeared on page one of the last Sunday Island, is in accor- External Affairs Minister However, the External TReconcilliation Commission and produce whatever evi- dance with the clamour of some anti-Sri Lankan sections of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission of Inquiry to Investigate the Involuntary Removal Or Disappearances of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces As Well As Mr M.C.M
    In exploring what constitutes a veritable minefield of contentious information in the current context in Sri Lanka, the author is indebted to Dr J. de Almeida Guneratne P.C., former Commissioner, 1994 Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate the Involuntary Removal or Disappearances of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces as well as Mr M.C.M. Iqbal, former Secretary to two Presidential Commissions of Inquiry into Involuntary Removal or Disappearances of Persons, with whom the perspectives of this research were shared. Research assistance was rendered by attorneys-at-law Prameetha Abeywickrema and Palitha de Silva, who also conducted interviews relevant to the analysis. Roger Normand, John Tyynela and Ian Seiderman of ICJ edited the report and provided invaluable substantive input and constant encouragement, which is deeply appreciated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
    [Show full text]
  • Mahinda in Male to Defuse Maldivian Political Crisis
    JVP retains control of Ports Co-op BY DASUN EDIRISINGHE ‘Ape Kandayama’, the team fielded by the JVP, won the Sri Lanka Ports Co-operative Society (SLPCS) election and secured 69 slots on the 85-member board. General Secretary of the All Ceylon General Ports Employee Union (ACG- PEU) Chandrasiri Mahagamage said they fielded 76 candidates for the Continued on page 5 Vol. 29 No. 198 Thursday 8th July, 2010, Pages 52 Rs. 20 Registered in Sri Lanka as a Newspaper - City Edition Galsworthy and social and 7 sexual transition Children and the reading Netherlands turns Lanka must break ee Page 3 See Page 7 10 16 : awyers Nicolas Sarkozy rce l in habit ps campaign the back of ook to eb nce received ‘illegal’ e evide on style, beats n donation, claim See Page 15 poverty to American widow Uruguay 3-2 lived with corpse of husband for become Asian 10 years Thursday July 8th, 2010 IsraeliIsraeli soldiersoldier ‘shot‘shot Mahinda in Male to defuse miracle twtwo women as they waved white flag’ Maldivian political crisis NFF supportersFinancial Review he sniper is to launch hunger Tthe only person to face prosecution over the killing of civilians during Rajapaksa described the Maldives as a the three-week Israeli incursion In this Monday, Jan. 5, 2009 file photo members of a Palestinian Bedouin family hold white flags as a signal to Israeli troops after leaving their house near the area where Israeli soldiers and Palestinian launched at the militants exchange fire outside Jebaliya refugee camp northern Gaza Strip. Israel’s military said end of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Confidence Index 14
    An Opinion Poll On Peace Peace Confidence Index (PCI) TOP-LINE RESULTS Social Indicator July 2003 © 2003 Social Indicator ● Centre for Policy Alternatives hile many studies have been conducted on various aspects of W this conflict, none have attempted to capture the changes in public perception over a period of time. The lack of such a study was identified as a significant void by Social Indicator (SI), the social research unit of the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA). The Peace Confidence Index study (PCI) seeks to fill this lacuna. The study will be conducted bi- monthly to gauge the impact of local and international political developments on public attitudes towards the peace process. This report was prepared with funds provided by: The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) under the Governance and Institutional Strengthening Project, (GISP) Sri Lanka. The U.S. Agency for International Development under the Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI), Sri Lanka. Peace Confidence Index Top-Line Results CONTENTS • INTRODUCTION 01 • KEY NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 02 • FINDINGS AT A GLANCE 06 • PEACE CONFIDENCE INDEX (PCI) 10 TOP-LINE RESULTS PERCEPTIONS OF WAR AND PEACE 10 SOLUTIONS TO THE CONFLICT 14 CONFIDENCE 16 THE PEACE PROCESS 20 INTERNATIONAL THIRD PARTY FACILITATION 21 NORWEGIAN FACILITATION 22 INDIA’S INVOLVEMENT 24 • RECENT POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS 25 SRI LANKA MONITORING MISSION 25 FEDERAL SOLUTION 30 THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY 31 FOREIGN AID 34 RECENT KILLINGS 36 INTERIM ADMINISTRATION 42 • ANNEX Copyright © Social Indicator July 2003 Peace Confidence Index Page 1 Top-line Results INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is two-fold. One is to develop a numerical indicator of the level of public confidence in the peace process using a set of standardised questions which remain unchanged with each wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Paper Parliament
    ( ) [ Sixth Parliament - Second Session ] No. 196.] ORDER PAPER OF PARLIAMENT FOR Tuesday, April 08, 2008 at 9.30 a.m. QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWERS 1405/’07 1. Hon. Ravi Karunanayake,— To ask the Prime Minister, Minister of Internal Administration, and Deputy Minister of Defence, Public Security, Law and Order,—(2) (a) Will he inform this House— (i) the number of families received the Samurdhi subsistence dole from the Government as at 30 th June of every year from 2004 to 2007 in the Gampaha District; and (ii) the categories of the above families according to the amount they received? (b) Will he state— (i) the value of inflation for the years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007; (ii) the value in real terms they received in the subsequent years up to 2007 when discounting the inflation taking 2004 as a base year; (iii) whether there is a drastic drop in the purchasing power of the Samurdhi recipients owing to the mishandling of the economy resulting a high inflation? (c) If not, why? 1406/’07 2. Hon. Ravi Karunanayake,— To ask the Prime Minister, Minister of Internal Administration, and Deputy Minister of Defence, Public Security, Law and Order,—(2) (a) Will he inform this House— (i) the number of families received the Samurdhi subsistence dole from the Government as at 30 th June of every year from 2004 to 2007 in the Kalutara District; and (2) (ii) the categories of the above families according to the amount they received? (b) Will he state— (i) the value of inflation for the years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007; (ii) the value in real terms they received in the subsequent years up to 2007 when discounting the inflation taking 2004 as a base year; (iii) whether there is a drastic drop in the purchasing power of the Samurdhi recipients owing to the mishandling of the economy resulting a high inflation? (c) If not, why? 1407/’07 3.
    [Show full text]