Board Members Jack Dale, Chair Councilmember, Santee Ron Roberts, Vice Chair Supervisor, County of San Diego Matt Hall Mayor, Carlsbad Mary Salas BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mayor, Chula Vista Carrie Downey AGENDA Councilmember, Coronado

Terry Sinnott Councilmember, Del Mar Friday, February 27, 2015 Bill Wells Mayor, El Cajon 9 a.m. to 12 noon Lisa Shaffer SANDAG Board Room Councilmember, Encinitas 401 B Street, 7th Floor Sam Abed Mayor, Escondido San Diego Robert Patton Councilmember, Imperial Beach Beginning in February, the parking garage elevators at Wells Fargo Plaza will Kristine Alessio undergo a six-month mechanical modernization. During this period, only one Councilmember, La Mesa garage elevator will be in service. Please allow yourself extra time to make your Mary Teresa Sessom Mayor, Lemon Grove way up from the garage to the SANDAG offices and Board Room. For those Ron Morrison requiring special assistance, please call the SANDAG front desk in advance of any Mayor, National City meetings at (619) 699-1900. Jim Wood Mayor, Oceanside Steve Vaus Mayor, Poway AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Kevin Faulconer Mayor, City of San Diego • TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: LAND Todd Gloria Councilmember, City of San Diego ACQUISITION GRANT PROGRAM APPRAISAL RESULTS AND Chris Orlando RECOMMENDATION Councilmember, San Marcos Lesa Heebner • FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FFY 2013 AND FFY 2014 Mayor, Solana Beach ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH Judy Ritter Mayor, Vista DISABILITIES (SECTION 5310) AND FY 2016 AND FY 2017 Bill Horn TransNet SENIOR MINI-GRANT PROGRAMS Chair, County of San Diego Advisory Members • STATE CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAMS Hon. John Renison Supervisor, District 1 Imperial County PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING Malcolm Dougherty, Director California Department YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS of Transportation MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG Harry Mathis, Chair Metropolitan Transit System MESSAGE FROM THE CLERK Mark Packard, Chair North County Transit District In compliance with Government Code §54952.3, the Clerk hereby announces that the compensation for legislative body members attending the following simultaneous or serial meetings is: Executive CAPT Darius Banaji, CEC, USN, CO, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Committee (EC) $100, Board of Directors (BOD) $150, and Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Southwest $100. Compensation rates for the EC and BOD are set pursuant to the SANDAG Bylaws and the U.S. Department of Defense compensation rate for the RTC is set pursuant to state law. Dan Malcolm, Chair San Diego Unified Port District MISSION STATEMENT Mark Muir, Vice Chair San Diego County Water Authority The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, plans, engineers, and Allen Lawson, Chairman Southern California Tribal builds public transit, and provides information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the region's Chairmen’s Association quality of life. Remedios Gómez-Arnau Consul General of Mexico San Diego Association of Governments ⋅ 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Gary L. Gallegos (619) 699-1900 ⋅ Fax (619) 699-1905 ⋅ sandag.org Executive Director, SANDAG

Welcome to SANDAG. Members of the public may speak to the Board of Directors on any item at the time the Board is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker’s Slip, which is located in the rear of the room, and then present the slip to the Clerk of the Board seated at the front table. Members of the public may address the Board on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications/Member Comments. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. The Board of Directors may take action on any item appearing on the agenda.

Public comments regarding the agenda can be sent to SANDAG via [email protected]. Please include the agenda item, your name, and your organization. Email comments should be received no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the Board of Directors meeting. Any handouts, presentations, or other materials from the public intended for distribution at the Board of Directors meeting should be received by the Clerk of the Board no later than 12 noon, two working days prior to the meeting.

In order to keep the public informed in an efficient manner and facilitate public participation, SANDAG also provides access to all agenda and meeting materials online at www.sandag.org/meetings. Additionally, interested persons can sign up for e-notifications via our e-distribution list at either the SANDAG website or by sending an email request to [email protected].

SANDAG operates its programs without regard to race, color, and national origin in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. SANDAG has developed procedures for investigating and tracking Title VI complaints and the procedures for filing a complaint are available to the public upon request. Questions concerning SANDAG nondiscrimination obligations or complaint procedures should be directed to SANDAG General Counsel, John Kirk, at (619) 699-1997 or [email protected]. Any person who believes himself or herself or any specific class of persons to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI also may file a written complaint with the Federal Transit Administration.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905.

SANDAG agenda materials can be made available in alternative languages. To make a request call (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Los materiales de la agenda de SANDAG están disponibles en otros idiomas. Para hacer una solicitud, llame al (619) 699-1900 al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión. 如有需要, 我们可以把SANDAG议程材料翻译成其他語言.

请在会议前至少 72 小时打电话 (619) 699-1900 提出请求.

SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 511 or see 511sd.com for route information. Bicycle parking is available in the parking garage of the SANDAG offices.

2 Rev. 021015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMITTEE Friday, February 27, 2015 ITEM NO. RECOMMENDATION +1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES APPROVE +1A. January 9, 2015, Board Policy Meeting Minutes +1B. January 23, 2015, Board Business Meeting Minutes

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS Public comments under this agenda item will be limited to five public speakers. Members of the public shall have the opportunity to address the Board on any issue within the jurisdiction of SANDAG that is not on this agenda. Other public comments will be heard during the items under the heading “Reports.” Anyone desiring to speak shall reserve time by completing a “Request to Speak” form and giving it to the Clerk of the Board prior to speaking. Public speakers should notify the Clerk of the Board if they have a handout for distribution to Board members. Public speakers are limited to three minutes or less per person. Board members also may provide information and announcements under this agenda item.

+3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES (Robyn Wapner) APPROVE This item summarizes the actions taken by the Policy Advisory Committees since the last Board Business Meeting. The Board of Directors is asked to ratify these actions.

CONSENT

+4. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS AND INFORMATION QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014 (André Douzdjian, Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin, and Marney Cox)* This quarterly report provides various finance-related items to the Board of Directors, including: (1) a quarterly report of investments, including all money under the direction or care of SANDAG; (2) an update on the SANDAG debt portfolio; and (3) information about the latest developments in the financial markets, the economy, and sales tax revenues.

+5. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE EXECUTIVE INFORMATION DIRECTOR (André Douzdjian)* In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarizes certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board of Directors meeting.

+6. QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS - INFORMATION OCTOBER THROUGH DECEMBER 2014 (Michelle Smith)* This quarterly report summarizes the current status of major transit, highway, arterial, traffic management, and Transportation Demand Management projects in the SANDAG five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program for the period October through December 2014.

3 +7. REPORT ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF SANDAG INFORMATION (Robyn Wapner) Board members will provide brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board of Directors meeting.

+8. FY 2016 TO FY 2020 TRANSPORTATION REVENUE ESTIMATES APPROVE (Sookyung Kim, Marney Cox)* By March 1 of each year, SANDAG provides revenue estimates for the upcoming fiscal year as well as a projection for the next four fiscal years to assist transit operators and local agencies in their capital and operational planning. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the FY 2016 Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) revenue apportionments, and FY 2016 TransNet and State Transit Assistance (STA) revenue allocations; and (2) approve the revenue estimates for FY 2017 to FY 2020 for TDA, STA, TransNet, and FTA.

+9. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: APPROVE PROPOSED FEE ADJUSTMENT (Marney Cox, Ariana zur Nieden)* The TransNet Extension Ordinance requires that the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP) fee charged by local jurisdictions be adjusted every year on July 1 in order to maintain the purchasing power of the program for improvements to the Regional Arterial System. The Board of Directors is asked to approve a 2.5 percent adjustment to the RTCIP, raising the minimum fee from $2,254 to $2,310, beginning July 1, 2015.

+10. TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: ANNUAL STATUS INFORMATION REPORT (Keith Greer)* This report provides the annual status update on the implementation of the TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program.

+11. FY 2014 AUDITED COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT INFORMATION (André Douzdjian)* In accordance with SANDAG Bylaws, the FY 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report audit has been completed and is presented for informational purposes. Additionally, in compliance with the Statement of Auditing Standards No. 114, this report includes communication of certain matters from the independent auditor to the Board of Directors as the governing body.

+12. ANNUAL UPDATE ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION RESEARCH DIVISION AND CLEARINGHOUSE (Cynthia Burke) As part of the SANDAG Criminal Justice Clearinghouse function, regional crime and arrest statistics as well as statistics related to drug use among the offender population are tracked and reported on a regular basis. SANDAG has maintained these statistics since the late 1980s and remains the only regional source for up- to-date historical information. An overview and update of the activities and accomplishments of the Criminal Justice Research Division and the Clearinghouse will be provided.

4 +13. APPOINTMENT OF POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS INFORMATION (Kim Kawada) This item summarizes the voting and advisory members appointed to the Executive, Transportation, Regional Planning, Borders, and Public Safety Committees as well as the Committee Chairs and Vice Chairs appointed by the SANDAG Chair.

CHAIR’S REPORT

14. SUMMARY OF ANNUAL SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS RETREAT* INFORMATION This report provides a summary of the discussion at the annual SANDAG Board of Directors Retreat held on January 28-30, 2015.

REPORTS

+15. TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: LAND ACQUISITION APPROVE GRANT PROGRAM APPRAISAL RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATION (Solana Beach Mayor Lesa Heebner, Regional Planning Committee Chair; Keith Greer)* The Transportation and Regional Planning Committees recommend that the Board of Directors approve the award of TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program land acquisition grant funding.

+16. FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND APPROVE FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES (SECTION 5310) AND FY 2016 AND FY 2017 TransNet SENIOR MINI-GRANT PROGRAMS (San Diego Councilmember Todd Gloria, Transportation Committee Chair; Audrey Porcella)* The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve: (1) the funding recommendations for the Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 and TransNet Senior Mini-Grant programs; and (2) a contingency allocation of any remaining federal funds to the unfunded Section 5310 projects based on rankings should additional funding become available.

+17A. STATE CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAMS (San Diego Councilmember INFORMATION Todd Gloria, Transportation Committee Chair; Robyn Wapner) This report provides a summary of the various transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions reduction programs created by the California Legislature under the Cap-and-Trade Investment Plan.

+17B. PROPOSED CAP-AND-TRADE PROJECT SUBMITTALS (San Diego APPROVE Councilmember Todd Gloria, Transportation Committee Chair; Robyn Wapner) The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the proposed full application submittals for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, pending invitation by the Department of Housing and Community Development; and (2) approve the proposed project submittals for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program.

5 18. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS If the five speaker limit for public comments was exceeded at the beginning of this agenda, other public comments will be taken at this time. Subjects of previous agenda items may not again be addressed under public comment.

19. UPCOMING MEETINGS INFORMATION The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 13, 2015, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, March 27, 2015, at 9 a.m.

20. ADJOURNMENT

+ next to an agenda item indicates an attachment * next to an agenda item indicates that the Board of Directors also is acting as the San Diego Regional Transportation Commission for that item

6

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-1A FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS

JANUARY 9, 2015

Chair Jack Dale (Santee) called the meeting of the SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 10:07 a.m. The attendance sheet for the meeting is attached.

1. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

There were no public or member comments.

REPORTS

2. UPDATE ON THE STATE ROUTE 11 AND OTAY MESA EAST PORT OF ENTRY PROJECT (DISCUSSION)

The State Route 11 and Otay Mesa East Port of Entry Project will improve the efficient movement of people and goods between the United States and Mexico. SANDAG and Caltrans are working to develop a new border crossing and associated transportation network, State Route 11, which includes an Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study and a draft Concept of Operations. This report provided the Board of Directors with an update on the project’s progress to date, proposed next steps, and a review of the project’s overall schedule.

Marney Cox, Chief Economist, and Mario Orso, Caltrans Corridor Director, presented the item.

Denise Ducheny, Otay Mesa and East Otay Mesa Property Owners Associations, spoke in favor of the project.

Xavier Peniche, City of Tijuana, spoke in favor of the project.

Michael DeLaRosa, Office of County Supervisor Greg Cox, spoke in favor of the project.

Alejandra Mier y Teran, Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the project.

Cindy Gompper Graves, South County Economic Development Council, spoke in favor of the project.

Jason Wells, San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the project.

Clarissa Falcon, South County Economic Development Corporation, spoke in favor of the project.

Ricardo Jinich, Paragon, spoke in favor of the project. David Wick, NEI, spoke in favor of the project.

Action: This item was presented for discussion.

Chair Dale adjourned to closed session at 11:34 a.m.

3. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(2) (ONE POTENTIAL CASE)

Amberlynn Deaton, Senior Legal Counsel, briefed the Board of Directors on a written claim filed by Caryon Properties, LLC, alleging damages to real property based on SANDAG construction of the Sorrento to Miramar Phase 1 Project in the City of San Diego.

Chair Dale reconvened to open session at 11:51 a.m.

John Kirk, General Counsel, reported the following out of closed session: On Item No. 3, the Board of Directors was briefed. Upon a motion by Mayor Jim Wood (Oceanside) and a second by Councilmember Todd Gloria (City of San Diego), the Board of Directors voted to deny the claim in its entirety. Yes – Chair Dale, Vice Chair Ron Roberts (County of San Diego), Mayor Mary Salas (Chula Vista), Councilmember Carrie Downey (Coronado), Councilmember Terry Sinnott (Del Mar), Mayor Bill Wells (El Cajon), Councilmember Lisa Shaffer (Encinitas), Mayor Sam Abed (Escondido), Councilmember Brian Bilbray (Imperial Beach), Deputy Mayor Kristine Alessio (La Mesa), Mayor Mary Sessom (Lemon Grove), Mayor Ron Morrison (National City), Mayor Wood, Mayor Steve Vaus (Poway), Councilmember Lorie Zapf (City of San Diego), Councilmember Gloria, Councilmember Chris Orlando (San Marcos), Mayor Lesa Heebner (Solana Beach), Mayor Judy Ritter (Vista), and Supervisor Bill Horn (County of San Diego) (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – Carlsbad.

4. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS

There were no continued public comments.

5. UPCOMING MEETINGS

The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, January 23, 2015, at 9 a.m.

6. ADJOURNMENT

Chair Dale adjourned the meeting at 11:52 a.m.

2 Meeting Start Time: 10:07 a.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 11:52 a.m.

ATTENDANCE SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JANUARY 9, 2015

ATTEND OPEN ATTEND CLOSED NAME JURISDICTION SESSION SESSION City of Carlsbad Matt Hall (Primary) Yes No City of Chula Vista Mary Salas (Primary) Yes Yes City of Coronado Carrie Downey (Primary) Yes Yes City of Del Mar Terry Sinnott (Primary) Yes Yes City of El Cajon Bill Wells (Primary) Yes Yes City of Encinitas Lisa Shaffer (Primary) Yes Yes City of Escondido Sam Abed (Primary) Yes Yes City of Imperial Beach Brian Bilbray (1st Alt.) Yes Yes City of La Mesa Kristine Alessio (Primary) Yes Yes City of Lemon Grove Mary Sessom (Primary) Yes Yes City of National City Ron Morrison (Primary) Yes Yes City of Oceanside Jim Wood (Primary) Yes Yes City of Poway Steve Vaus (Primary) Yes Yes City of San Diego - A Lorie Zapf (1st Alt.) Yes Yes City of San Diego - B Todd Gloria (Primary, Seat B) Yes Yes City of San Marcos Chris Orlando (Primary) Yes Yes City of Santee Jack Dale, Chair (Primary) Yes Yes City of Solana Beach Lesa Heebner (Primary) Yes Yes City of Vista Judy Ritter (Primary) Yes Yes County of San Diego - A Bill Horn (Primary, Seat A) Yes Yes County of San Diego - B Ron Roberts, Vice Chair (Primary, Seat B) Yes Yes ADVISORY MEMBERS Caltrans Laurie Berman (1st. Alt.) Yes MTS Harry Mathis (Primary) No NCTD Mark Packard Yes Imperial County Sup. John Renison (Primary) No

US Dept. of Defense CAPT Darius Banaji (Primary) No SD Unified Port District Bob Nelson (Primary) No SD County Water Mark Muir (Primary) Yes Authority Mexico Juan Carlos Rives (Alternate) Yes Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Allen Lawson (Primary) No Association

3

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-1B FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS

JANUARY 23, 2015

Chair Jack Dale (Santee) called the meeting of the SANDAG Board of Directors to order at 9:02 a.m. The attendance sheet for the meeting is attached.

1. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES

Action: Upon a motion by Vice Chair Ron Roberts (Supervisor, County of San Diego) and a second by Mayor Lesa Heebner (Solana Beach), the Board of Directors approved the minutes from the December 5, 2014, Board Policy meeting and the December 19, 2014, Board Business meeting. Yes – Chair Dale, Vice Chair Roberts, Mayor Matt Hall (Carlsbad), Mayor Mary Salas (Chula Vista), Councilmember Bill Sandke (Coronado), Councilmember Terry Sinnott (Del Mar), Councilmember Lisa Shaffer (Encinitas), Mayor Sam Abed (Escondido), Councilmember Robert Patton (Imperial Beach), Deputy Mayor Kristine Alessio (La Mesa), Mayor Mary Sessom (Lemon Grove), Councilmember Chuck Lowery (Oceanside), Mayor Steve Vaus (Poway) Councilmember Lorie Zapf (City of San Diego), Councilmember Todd Gloria (City of San Diego), Councilmember Chris Orlando (San Marcos), Mayor Heebner, and Supervisor Bill Horn (County of San Diego) (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – El Cajon, National City, and Vista.

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS/MEMBER COMMENTS

Mike Werner, a member of the public, spoke regarding his concerns regarding Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) bus safety and drivers not paying attention to people on the road near the bus.

Vice Chair Roberts announced that the official opening of the new low-floor Trolley cars on the Blue Line will be held Tuesday, January 27, 2015, at the 8th Street Trolley Station.

Chair Harry Mathis (MTS) also commented that he; Paul Jablonski, MTS Chief Executive Officer; and Wayne Terry, MTS Chief of Rail, rode the Blue Line Trolley from 12th and Imperial station down to San Ysidro and back. He stated that the ride quality has improved and that they heard very positive comments from passengers.

3. ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES (APPROVE)

This item summarized the actions taken by Policy Advisory Committees since the last Board Business meeting. The Board of Directors was asked to ratify these actions. Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Heebner and a second by Councilmember Zapf, the Board of Directors approved Item No. 3. Yes – Chair Dale, Vice Chair Roberts, Mayor Hall, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Sandke, Councilmember Sinnott, Councilmember Shaffer, Mayor Abed, Councilmember Patton, Deputy Mayor Alessio, Mayor Sessom, Mayor Ron Morrison (National City), Councilmember Lowery, Mayor Vaus, Councilmember Zapf, Councilmember Gloria, Councilmember Orlando, Mayor Heebner, Mayor Judy Ritter (Vista), and Supervisor Horn (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – El Cajon.

CONSENT

4. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SOLICITATION AND CONTRACT AWARD (APPROVE)

The Board of Directors was asked to review and approve the proposed solicitation and contract award.

5. REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INFORMATION)

In accordance with various SANDAG Board Policies, this report summarized certain delegated actions taken by the Executive Director since the last Board of Directors meeting.

6. REPORT ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF SANDAG (INFORMATION)

Board members provided brief reports orally or in writing on external meetings and events attended on behalf of SANDAG since the last Board of Directors meeting

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Hall and a second by Councilmember Zapf, the Board of Directors approved Consent Items Nos. 4 through 6. Yes – Chair Dale, Vice Chair Roberts, Mayor Hall, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Sandke, Councilmember Sinnott, Councilmember Shaffer, Mayor Abed, Councilmember Patton, Deputy Mayor Alessio, Mayor Sessom, Mayor Morrison, Councilmember Lowery, Mayor Vaus, Councilmember Zapf, Councilmember Gloria, Councilmember Orlando, Mayor Heebner, Mayor Ritter, and Supervisor Horn; No – 0; Abstain – 0; Absent – El Cajon.

REPORTS

7. PROPOSED 2015 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM (APPROVE)

Consistent with past programs, the proposed 2015 Legislative Program includes policies and proposals for possible federal and state legislation and local activities. The Executive Committee recommended that the Board of Directors approve the proposed 2015 SANDAG Legislative Program.

Vice Chair Roberts introduced the item.

Robyn Wapner, Senior Legislative Analyst, presented the item.

Action: Upon a motion by Mayor Abed and a second by Councilmember Sandke, the Board of Directors approved the proposed 2015 SANDAG Legislative Program. Yes – Chair Dale, Vice Chair Roberts, Mayor Hall, Mayor Salas, Councilmember Sandke, Councilmember Sinnott, Councilmember Shaffer, Mayor Abed, Councilmember Patton, Deputy Mayor Alessio, Mayor Sessom,

2 Mayor Morrison, Councilmember Lowery, Mayor Vaus, Councilmember Zapf, Councilmember Gloria, Councilmember Orlando, Mayor Heebner, Mayor Ritter, and Supervisor Horn (weighted vote, 100%). No – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Abstain – 0 (weighted vote, 0%). Absent – El Cajon.

8. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM (INFORMATION)

Federal regulations require that the agency maintain an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program as a condition of receipt of federal funds. SANDAG administrative policies and procedures mandate EEOs in recruitment, hiring, and employment for both applicants and employees. In accordance with SANDAG Board Policy No. 007: Equal Employment Opportunity Program, this report summarized employment results for 2014 and reviewed EEO Program goals for the upcoming year.

Melissa Coffelt, Human Resources Manager, presented the item.

Action: This item was presented for information.

Chair Dale adjourned to closed session at 9:23 a.m.

9. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) – FRIENDS OF ROSE CANYON V. SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ET AL. (SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 37-2014- 00043105-CU-TT-CTL) (APPROVE)

The Board of Directors was briefed on the status of the referenced litigation regarding a challenge to the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project environmental document.

Chair Dale reconvened to open session at 9:50 a.m.

John Kirk, General Counsel, reported the following out of closed session: On Item 9, the SANDAG Board of Directors was briefed on the referenced litigation and there is no reportable action.

10. CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS

Chair Dale reminded the Board members that the Board Retreat is scheduled for January 28 through 30, 2015, at the Barona Resort, and reviewed the major agenda items.

11. UPCOMING MEETINGS

The next Board Policy meeting is scheduled for Friday, February 13, 2015, at 10 a.m. The next Board Business meeting is scheduled for Friday, February 27, 2015, at 9 a.m.

12. ADJOURNMENT

Chair Dale adjourned the meeting at 9:51 a.m.

3 Meeting Start Time: 9:02 a.m. Meeting Adjourned Time: 9:51 a.m.

ATTENDANCE SANDAG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JANUARY 23, 2015

ATTEND OPEN ATTEND CLOSED NAME JURISDICTION SESSION SESSION City of Carlsbad Matt Hall (Primary) Yes Yes City of Chula Vista Mary Salas (Primary) Yes Yes City of Coronado Bill Sandke (2nd Alt.) Yes Yes City of Del Mar Terry Sinnott (Primary) Yes Yes City of El Cajon Bill Wells (Primary) No No City of Encinitas Lisa Shaffer (Primary) Yes Yes City of Escondido Sam Abed (Primary) Yes Yes City of Imperial Beach Robert Patton (Primary) Yes Yes City of La Mesa Kristine Alessio (Primary) Yes Yes City of Lemon Grove Mary Sessom (Primary) Yes No City of National City Ron Morrison (Primary) Yes Yes City of Oceanside Chuck Lowery (2nd. Alt.) Yes Yes City of Poway Steve Vaus (Primary) Yes Yes City of San Diego - A Lorie Zapf (1st Alt.) Yes Yes City of San Diego - B Todd Gloria (Primary, Seat B) Yes Yes City of San Marcos Chris Orlando (Primary) Yes Yes City of Santee Jack Dale, Chair (Primary) Yes Yes City of Solana Beach Lesa Heebner (Primary) Yes Yes City of Vista Judy Ritter (Primary) Yes Yes County of San Diego - A Bill Horn (Primary, Seat A) Yes Yes County of San Diego - B Ron Roberts (Primary, Seat B) Yes Yes ADVISORY MEMBERS Caltrans Chris Schmidt (2nd. Alt.) Yes MTS Harry Mathis (Primary) Yes NCTD Mark Packard (Primary) Yes Imperial County Sup. John Renison (Primary) No US Dept. of Defense CAPT Darius Banaji (Primary) No SD Unified Port District Garry Bonelli (1st Alt) Yes SD County Water Authority Mark Muir (Primary) Yes Mexico Remedios Gómez-Arnau (Primary) Yes Southern California Tribal Allen Lawson (Primary) Yes Chairmen’s Association

4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

ACTIONS FROM POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES File Number 8000100

Introduction Recommendation

The following actions were taken by the Policy The Board of Directors is asked to ratify Advisory Committees since the last Board of Directors the actions of the Policy Advisory meeting. Committees.

BORDERS COMMITTEE MEETING (January 23, 2015)

The Borders Committee did not take any actions or make any recommendations at this meeting.

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING (February 6, 2015)

The Transportation Committee took the following actions or recommended the following approvals:

• Approved two no-cost, time-only schedule extensions for the Active Transportation Grant Program for the City of Chula Vista’s Main Street Streetscape Master Plan and the City of Solana Beach’s Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy.

• Approved the submission of concept proposals for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit and Inland Rail Trail projects under the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, and recommended that the Board of Directors approve the submission of full applications for these projects, pending invitation from the Department of Housing and Community Development.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve the award of TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program land acquisition grant funding.

REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING (February 6, 2015)

The Regional Planning Committee took the following actions or recommended the following approvals:

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve the award of TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program land acquisition grant funding.

• Approved one no-cost, time-only schedule extension for the Smart Growth Incentive Program for the City of San Diego’s Park Boulevard, San Diego High School, and City College Pedestrian and Transit Access Improvements Project.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING (February 13, 2015)

The Executive Committee took the following action:

• Approved the agendas for the February 27, 2015, Board Business meeting, as amended, and the March 13, 2015, Board Policy meeting.

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING (February 20, 2015)

The Transportation Committee took the following actions or recommended the following approvals:

• Approved Resolution No. 2015-16, endorsing the score for the one eligible Traditional Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Project, and making a finding that the project and the one Expanded FTA Section 5310 Project are included in the adopted 2014-2018 Coordinated Public Transit and Human Services Transportation Plan and are consistent with the objectives of the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan and its Sustainable Communities Strategy.

• Adopted Resolution No. 2015-17, approving the FY 2015 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 4 Claim Amendment, and directed staff to provide instructions to the County Office of Auditor Controller to revise the claim.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit and Del Lago Parking Access Control projects for submission to the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve the FY 2016 TDA and FTA revenue apportionments, and FY 2016 TransNet and State Transit Assistance (STA) revenue allocations and approve the revenue estimates for FY 2017 to FY 2020 TDA, FTA, TransNet, and STA.

• Recommended that the Board of Directors approve the funding recommendations for the FTA Section 5310 and TransNet Senior Mini-Grant Programs and a contingency allocation of any remaining federal funds to the unfunded FTA Section 5310 projects based on rankings should additional funding become available.

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING (February 20, 2015)

The Public Safety Committee meeting was cancelled.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Key Staff Contact: Robyn Wapner, (619) 699-1994, [email protected]

2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FINANCIAL File Number 8000180 MARKETS AND QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014

Introduction

Staff provides quarterly briefings intended to keep the Board of Directors informed about the latest developments in the financial markets, the economy, and sales tax revenues; the strategies being explored and implemented to minimize possible impacts to the TransNet Program; and a quarterly report on investments as required per Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy.

Discussion

Market Review and Update

Overview

The municipal market AAA MMD Rates benefitted from positive muni ∆ market technicals last year – Maturity 1/2/14 4/1/14 7/1/14 10/1/14 1/2/15 1/29/15 1/2/14 – 1/29/15 i.e., relatively low new issue 3-Year 0.59% 0.70% 0.58% 0.60% 0.80% 0.61% +0.02% supply coupled with a strong 5-Year 1.32% 1.31% 1.23% 1.16% 1.29% 0.94% -0.38% demand picture which resulted 10-Year 2.79% 2.51% 2.29% 2.12% 2.01% 1.75% -1.04% in declining intermediate- and 20-Year 3.89% 3.38% 3.06% 2.78% 2.59% 2.38% -1.51% long-term interest rates. 30-Year 4.20% 3.68% 3.30% 3.04% 2.83% 2.54% -1.66% Refinancings outpaced new financings at a rate of 19.2 percent in 2014 over 2013. However, new financings decreased 7.3 percent from 2014 to 2013.

The fourth quarter in the municipal market often is marked by greater volatility and an increase in municipal bond issuance, which was the case for 2014. As mentioned previously, the demand for high-quality fixed income assets has been great, which served to offset the supply and mute volatility. The end of the year performance also benefited from an investor flight to safety, which continued to push yields lower and prices higher.

As the calendar turned to 2015, those trends have continued and tax-exempt borrowing rates are approaching historic lows. We have seen a pronounced flattening of the yield, as long term rates have pushed lower while short-term rates have increased in certain maturities. There has been significant volatility in interest rates in the month of January. Economic data and central bank policy will remain a key driver of investor activity and volatility in the marketplace.

AAA MMD Yield Curve Movement

1/2/2014 1/2/2015 1/29/2015 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 1-Year 2-Year 3-Year 4-Year 5-Year 6-Year 7-Year 8-Year 9-Year 10-Year 11-Year 12-Year 13-Year 14-Year 15-Year 16-Year 17-Year 18-Year 19-Year 20-Year 21-Year 22-Year 23-Year 24-Year 25-Year 26-Year 27-Year 28-Year 29-Year 30-Year

Benchmark Tax-Exempt Rate History Benchmark Tax-Exempt Rate History (June 1, 1981, Inception to January 29, 2015) (January 2, 2014, to January 29, 2015) Increase from Previous Day (Left Axis) 30-Year MMD Decrease from Previous Day (Left Axis) 13.50% 20 Year AAA MMD (Right Axis) 15 bps 4.00% 11.50% 10 bps 9.50% 3.50% 5 bps

7.50% 0 bps 3.00%

5.50% -5 bps 2.50% 3.50% -10 bps

1.50% -15 bps 2.00%

2 Municipal Market Supply1 Issuance Volume In December 2014, municipal bond issuance

volume increased dramatically by 51 percent to 2013 2014 $34.4 billion compared to $22.8 billion in 40,000 December 2013. $ in Millions 35,000

Long-term municipal bond issuance volume in 30,000 the fourth quarter of calendar year 2014 25,000 increased by 34.8 percent to $94.4 billion in 2,773 issues compared to $70.1 billion in 20,000 2,255 issues through the same period in 2013. 15,000

10,000 In 2014, refunding volume increased 19.2 percent to $113.5 billion from $95.2 billion 5,000

and new-money volume decreased by 0 7.3 percent to $126.3 billion from $136.4 billion, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec versus in 2013. Total volume in 2014 increased by 12.4 percent from a year earlier. Supply is expected to continue to increase in 2015.

Refinancings and new financings have picked up pace for many sectors, with investment in the transportation sector following trend. The transportation sector’s issuance in 2014 increased slightly by 0.2 percent from a year earlier.

Interest Rate Forecasts

The Federal Reserve (the Fed) ended its quantitative easing program and ceased security purchases in the fourth quarter of 2014. The focus of the discussion now is when the Fed will increase short-term rates. The Federal Open Market Committee suggested that the zero interest rate policy would continue for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends. Market participants are expecting that the rate hikes could begin in mid- 2015.

The table below provides an average of interest rate forecasts by industry professionals. These are surveyed and compiled by Bloomberg. As noted, the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate is forecast to increase to 2.75 percent by the fourth quarter of calendar year 2015. The 30-year U.S. Treasury rate is forecast to increase to 3.30 percent by the fourth quarter of calendar year 2015. The 2-year U.S. Treasury rate is forecast to increase to 1.45 percent by the fourth quarter of 2015. Increases to the Fed Funds Target Rate are expected by some industry professionals to begin in the second or third quarter of 2015.

The Street's Interest Rate Forecast2 Forecast 1/30/2015 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 30-Year UST 2.27% 2.70% 2.93% 3.13% 3.30% 3.46% 3.60% 10-Year UST 1.70% 2.17% 2.38% 2.57% 2.75% 2.94% 3.08% 2-Year UST 0.48% 0.66% 0.93% 1.20% 1.45% 1.68% 1.93% 3M LIBOR 0.25% 0.29% 0.45% 0.68% 0.97% 1.27% 1.61% Fed Funds Target Rate 0.25% 0.25% 0.40% 0.65% 0.90% 1.20% 1.50%

1 Issuance data from Thomson Reuters, compiled by The Bond Buyer. 2 Bloomberg survey compilation as of January 30, 2015

3 Debt Portfolio Overview and Update

Outstanding Debt Overview

Following the 2014 bond issuance last October, SANDAG has $1.49 billion of outstanding long-term debt, consisting of the Series 2008 variable-rate bonds, the 2010 Series A taxable Build America Bonds, the 2010 Series B tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds, the 2012 Series A tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds, and the recently issued 2014 Series A tax-exempt fixed-rate bonds. Of the total debt portfolio, 27 percent consists of synthetic fixed-rate bonds (variable-rate bonds hedged with fixed- payer interest rate swaps) and the remaining 73 percent are fixed-rate bonds. A summary of the outstanding bonds is tabulated and graphically presented below.

Summary of Outstanding Debt Original Issue Outstanding Call Final Series Tax Status Coupon Type Size Par Option Maturity 2008A Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2008B Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2008C Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 2008D Tax-Exempt Variable-Rate $150,000,000 $100,575,000 Current 4/1/2038 Make- 2010A Taxable BABs Fixed-Rate $338,960,000 $338,960,000 4/1/2048 Whole 2010B Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $11,040,000 $8,850,000 4/1/2020 4/1/2030 2012A Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $420,585,000 $388,035,000 4/1/2022 4/1/2048 2014A Tax-Exempt Fixed-Rate $350,000,000 $350,000,000 4/1/2024 4/1/2048 Total $1,488,145,000

Outstanding Par Breakdown by Fixed and Hedged Outstanding Par Breakdown by Tax Status

Synthetic Taxable Fixed Rate BABs $402.3 mm $338.96 mm 27% 23% Tax-Exempt Fixed Rate $1,149.185 $1,085.845 mm mm 77% 73%

Debt Service and Coverage

As seen in the figure below, SANDAG has an aggregate level debt service profile with approximately $84.1 million in debt service per year through FY 2048, including the newly issued Series 2014A. Debt service coverage, using sales tax receipts of $265.2 million for the last 12 months ending December 31, 2014, is 3.15 times. For every $1.00 of debt service, SANDAG received $3.15 of sales tax revenue providing ample coverage.

4 This high debt service coverage, together with the level annual debt service payment and fairly conservative debt portfolio are critical factors that supported the SANDAG triple-A ratings from Fitch and S&P.

Aggregate Debt Service Profile

Series 2008A Series 2008B Series 2008C Series 2008D Series 2010A Series 2010B Series 2012A Series 2014A

$100,000,000

$80,000,000

$60,000,000

$40,000,000

$20,000,000

$0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048

Recent Variable-Rate Demand Bond and Swap Mark-to-Market Performance

SANDAG has $402.3 million of outstanding variable-rate demand bonds (VRDBs) (Series 2008 A, B, C, and D). These VRDBs are backed by Standby Bond Purchase Agreements from certain financial institutions. The interest rate on these bonds resets weekly through a remarketing process. SANDAG VRDBs have been trading well, with their interest rate resets at or below the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Index (the benchmark short-term municipal index) resets. On average, SANDAG VRDBs have reset at a rate of 0.09 percent to 0.10 percent since September 29, 2011.

SANDAG Series 2008ABCD VRDB Resets Since September 29, 2011

Series SBPA Provider Remarketing Agent Reset Average SIFMA Average Spread to SIFMA

2008A JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Barclays Capital Inc. 0.10% 0.10% 0 bps

2008B JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Goldman Sachs & Company 0.10% 0.10% 0 bps

2008C Mizuho Corporate Bank J.P. Morgan Securities LLC 0.09% 0.10% -1 bps

2008D State Street/CALSTRS E.J. De La Rosa & Company 0.09% 0.10% -1 bps

5 SANDAG also has $402.3 million of fixed-payer interest rate swaps outstanding), the purpose of which is to hedge the interest rate variability associated with the $402.3 million of variable-rate bonds. Additionally, SANDAG has $313.2 million of basis swaps outstanding. Under the basis swaps, which become effective on April 1, 2018, when the existing fixed-payer swaps were originally scheduled to convert from LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) to SIFMA based indices, SANDAG will pay its counterparty a floating interest rate payment based upon the SIFMA Index and will receive a floating payment based upon 107.4 percent of three-month LIBOR. The market value of the SANDAG swap portfolio changes with interest rate fluctuations. The mark-to-market valuation, as of January 30, 2015, is approximately ($99,821,901); meaning SANDAG would need to pay approximately $99.8 million to terminate the entire swap portfolio in the current market. However, the swaps are performing as expected and currently there are no reasons that SANDAG would terminate the swaps. On an annual basis and in accordance with Board Policy No. 032: San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission Interest Rate Swap Policy, an annual written description of the swaps and an evaluation of the risks associated with outstanding interest rate swaps are presented to the Board of Directors for review.

Swap Portfolio Overview

Associated SANDAG Trade Effective Maturity MTM Value Notional SANDAG Receives Bank Counterparty Series Pays Date Date Date (As of 1/30/15) Outstanding

65% of USD-LIBOR 'til 05/23/201 05/23/201 04/01/203 Bank of America, N.A. Series 2008 3.8165% 04/18; SIFMA Swap ($37,012,891) $134,100,000 2 2 8 (A2/A/A) Index thereafter

Goldman Sachs Mitsui 65% of USD-LIBOR 'til 05/23/201 05/23/201 04/01/203 Marine Derivative Series 2008 3.8165% 04/18; SIFMA Swap ($37,012,891) $134,100,000 2 2 8 Products, L.P. Index thereafter (Aa2/AAA/ )

05/23/201 05/23/201 04/01/203 Bank of America, N.A. Series 2008 3.4100% 65% of USD-LIBOR ($38,893,267) $134,100,000 2 2 8 (A2/A/A)

Total Fixed Payer Swaps ($112,918,049) $402,300,000

SIFMA Swap 107.4% of 3 Month 03/19/200 04/01/201 04/01/203 Barclays Bank PLC Series 2008 $6,548,073 $156,600,000 Index LIBOR 9 8 8 (A2/A/A)

SIFMA Swap 107.4% of 3 Month 03/19/200 04/01/201 04/01/203 Barclays Bank PLC Series 2008 $6,548,073 $156,600,000 Index LIBOR 9 8 8 (A2/A/A)

Total Index Conversion Swaps $13,096,147 $313,200,000

Total Combined ($99,821,901) $715,500,000

Cost of Capital

SANDAG has a very attractive weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 3.90 percent. This cost can vary based upon swap performance and the cost of liquidity to support the variable-rate debt.

6 Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index and SANDAG’s WACC

30-Year Fixed Rate Bond Buyer Revenue30-Year Bond Fixed Index Rate Bond Buyer RevenueSANDAG's Bond Current Index Weighted Average Cost of Capital 7.00% Series 2008 SeriesSeries 2010 2010 SeriesSeries 2012 2012 SeriesSeries 2014A 201 4A 6.50%

6.00%

5.50%

5.00%

4.50%

4.00%

3.50%

3.00%

The 2008A-D bonds with the current swap rate and associated fees provide a cost of capital equal to 4.18 percent. SANDAG staff, with its financial advisors Public Financial Management (PFM), negotiated lower SBPA fees on the Series 2008A and Series 2008B Bonds with JP Morgan in February 2014 and in September 2014 - closed on a renewal of the Series 2008C SBPA at a lower fee with Mizuho. The 2010A bonds were issued as taxable Build America Bonds and have a borrowing cost of 3.89 percent. The 2010B tax-exempt bonds have a borrowing cost of 3.14 percent. The 2012A bonds were sold at an all-in cost of 3.72 percent and the most recent Series 2014A were sold at an all-in cost of 3.85 percent. Taken together, SANDAG has issued approximately $1.52 billion in bonds, to accelerate project delivery, for a weighted average cost of 3.90 percent.

SANDAG’s WACC Calculations Synthetic Fixed Rate:

Remarketing Agent Series Par Post ‘12 Refunding Swap Rate SBPA Fee Cost of Capital Fee 2008A $100,575,000 3.8165% 0.390% 0.06% 4.2665% 2008B $100,575,000 3.8165% 0.390% 0.06% 4.2665% 2008C1 $67,050,000 3.8165% 0.320% 0.06% 4.1965% 2008C2 $33,525,000 3.4100% 0.320% 0.06% 3.7900% 2008D $100,575,000 3.4100% 0.650% 0.06% 4.1200% 2008 Weighted Avg. 4.1785% Fixed Rate: Series Original Par - - - All-in TIC 2010A $338,960,000 - - - 3.8871% 2010B $11,040,000 - - - 3.1434% 2012A $420,585,000 - - - 3.7167% 2014A $350,000,000 - - - 3.8507% Total Weighted Avg. 3.9033%

7 Commercial Paper

In addition to the long-term debt, SANDAG has a short-term Commercial Paper Program supported by a Letter of Credit from Union Bank. The Commercial Paper Program was authorized at $75 million and has a current outstanding balance of $30.745 million as of January 31, 2015. The paper was most recently remarketed out 97 days at a rate of eight basis points.

Looking Ahead

SANDAG and its financing team submitted a Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (“TIFIA”) Letter of Interest to the U.S. Department of Transportation in mid-December 2014. SANDAG along with its financing team also had an initial conference call with the TIFIA team in mid-January to discuss project overview and answer any outstanding questions. Based on subsequent conversations, SANDAG is currently working on updating the funding proposal to provide to the TIFIA office.

There is no new money bond transaction expected to take place in FY 2015. However, SANDAG and its advisors will continue to monitor the municipal bond market and identify opportunities that best allow SANDAG to meet its financing needs and objectives.

Quarterly Investment Data

Included with this quarterly finance report through December 31, 2014, are: a summary of portfolio balances by institution (Attachment 1); a detail of portfolio balances by account (Attachment 2); and a detail of portfolio balances by investment type (Attachment 3) for all money under the direction or care of SANDAG, including funds of the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), SourcePoint, and the Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS).

As of December 31, 2014, a total of $915.3 million was held by SANDAG in a number of investment accounts, in comparison to $903.1 million held in the previous quarter. The $12.2 million increase during the quarter is primarily due to the issuance of the 2014 bonds, timing of TransNet sales tax receipts, TransNet debt service payments, TransNet allocation payments to other local governmental agencies, and the use of TransNet to fund current projects in advance of the 2014 Bond issuance.3

Approximately $4.8 million was held in seven Bank of America accounts, $32.5 million in ten U.S. Bank, N.A. accounts, and $31,269 in two Wells Fargo accounts at the end of the quarter. Funds in these accounts are used for operating purposes. Approximately $877.9 million was invested in eight institutions, as follows:

1. State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) – State law allows local agencies (RTC and SANDAG) to invest up to $50 million per agency in LAIF. These funds hold excess operating funds for the RTC and SANDAG. A total of approximately $41.2 million was invested in LAIF, of which the RTC held approximately $38.4 million of sales tax funds and SANDAG held $2.8 million. These funds are highly liquid, and funds may be accessed easily for immediate operating needs.

3 Due to rounding, the numbers below may not tie to the attached detail of investments.

8 2. California Asset Management Program (CAMP) – These are funds administered by PFM Asset Management LLC, one of the two SANDAG financial advisors. The Cash Reserve Portfolio, totaling $79 million, is used for the investment of the 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014 TransNet bond proceeds needed for payment in the short-term, and excess operating funds for Interstate 15 FasTrak®, State Route 125 (SR 125), ARJIS, Coronado Bridge Toll Funds, and TransNet sales tax funds not yet paid to other local governmental agencies. In addition, CAMP uses the Individual Portfolio, totaling $370.8 million, for the investment of SR 125 excess operating funds, the 2008 and 2014 TransNet bond proceeds and TransNet sales tax funds not yet paid to other local governmental agencies.

3. U.S. Bank – These funds, totaling approximately $32.8 million, were held by U.S. Bank, Trustee for bond debt service payments and payment of interest on the short-term Commercial Paper Program, as part of the TransNet Program, and for the toll revenues of the SR 125 franchise. Of this balance, $29.4 million of the investments held by U.S. Bank is invested in North County Transit District auction rate securities purchased with commercial paper.

4. The Bank of New York Mellon – These are funds administered by Cutwater Asset Management, one of the two SANDAG financial advisors. The Individual Portfolio, totaling $185.1 million, and the Cash Reserve Portfolio, totaling $1 million, are used for the investment of excess TransNet sales tax revenue not yet paid for TransNet-approved projects.

5. San Diego County Treasurer’s Pooled Money Fund – These funds, totaling $165.4 million, were held by the San Diego’s County Treasurer’s Pooled Money Fund. The funds consist of the SourcePoint Cash Reserve Fund for the City of Santee, ARJIS, the SANDAG Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies, TransNet sales tax revenues, and TransNet 2014 bond proceeds.

6. DWS Money Market Series Institutional Funds – This institution holds the funds received by SANDAG from the California Department of Boating and Waterways. There was a total of $268,764 in a mutual fund.

7. California Bank and Trust – There was approximately $1.6 million on deposit with California Bank and Trust pursuant to capital project escrow retention agreements with various contractors.

8. California Bank of Commerce – There was $721,868 on deposit with California Bank of Commerce pursuant to capital project escrow retention agreements with a contractor.

The chart below provides a snapshot of the investment holding locations at December 31, 2014.

Investment Holdings BANK OF AMERICA WELLS FARGO BANK LAIF CAMP IP CAMP CASH RESERVE US BANK BNY MELLON IP BNY MELLON CASH RESERVE COSD TREASURER'S POOL CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE DWS CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST

9 As shown in the chart below, as of December 31, 2014, the yield on cost of the portfolio was 0.51 percent, with a weighted average maturity of 419 days, in comparison to 0.44 percent and 399 days in the prior quarter.

Quarterly Yield on Cost 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10 Sep-11 Sep-12 Sep-13 Sep-14 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Mar-09 Mar-10 Mar-11 Mar-12 Mar-13 Mar-14

The Finance Department has continued to implement the Board investment objectives of safety, liquidity, and return on investment for the SANDAG investment portfolio. These will continue to be important investment objectives for the future.

Certifications

The Director of Finance reports that this investment portfolio, together with the authorized short- term Commercial Paper Program, will provide the necessary liquidity to meet the expenditure requirements of SANDAG, RTC, ARJIS, and SourcePoint for the next six months. This portfolio is in compliance with state law and Board Policy No. 003.

The Local Economy and Sales Tax Revenues

The U.S. economy recorded a very volatile year during 2014. The growth rate for the nation’s total value of goods and services, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), produced during the year got off to a rocky start and declined 2.1 percent. The second and third quarters picked up dramatically rising 4.5 percent and 5 percent, respectively before slowing to 2.6 percent during the fourth quarter of 2014. After all the volatility, the nation’s GDP increased 2.4 percent which was in line with the slow annual growth rates recorded since the end of the Great Recession. The consensus outlook for 2015 is for GDP growth to exceed 3 percent.

To achieve a GDP growth rate of 3 percent or higher likely requires more jobs in total and more jobs of a higher quality than has been produced over this past year. Job growth during the past year was the highest it has been since 1999. Nationwide, payroll job growth averaged 246,000 jobs per month compared with 196,000 per month the year before, a 25 percent increase. Nearly three million jobs were created nationwide during 2014 at a growth rate of about 2 percent. The increase in the rate of job production pushed the unemployment rate down to 5.6 percent in December 2014, nearly the same level as before the start of the Great Recession. Locally, the

10 increase in jobs has outpaced the improved national rate. The San Diego region recorded 44,500 new payroll jobs through December 2014 on a year over year basis, a rise of a 3.3 percent, more than a full percentage point above the national rate of increase. In addition, the local unemployment rate dropped more than the nation’s over the same time period, falling to 5.2 percent and is now below the national rate for only the second time over the past seven years.

The much improved trend for job growth is somewhat dampened by lingering concerns about the economic recovery and economic growth globally. Additional concerns about the recovery include weakness in wage rate growth and the average number of hours worked; these trends, combined with the types of jobs (part-time, temporary with low pay) that have been created since the end of the recession have contributed to keeping real per capita disposable income stagnant for the past three years. This, in turn, has led to weak growth in consumer spending, which makes up more than 70 percent of the economy and is a primary driver of sales tax revenue. Even the recent decline in gas and energy prices is expected to shift consumer expenditures to different categories after a lag rather than push overall spending up in the near term. Additional economic headwinds are expected from the slowing of economic growth globally and in turn the effect on the trade value of the dollar. Most of the United States major trading partners are experiencing slower economic growth, including China, Japan, Europe, Mexico, Brazil, and Russia, in turn the trade value of the dollar is rising making our goods in these markets more expensive, reducing our exports. In light of these economic headwinds, staff is forecasting an increase in sales tax revenue consistent with the rate of increase experienced during 2014, about 5 percent.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. SANDAG Summary of Portfolio Balances (by Institution) as of December 31, 2014 2. SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of December 31, 2014 3. SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Key Staff Contacts: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected] Marney Cox, (619) 699-1960, [email protected] Lisa Kondrat-Dauphin (619) 699-1942, [email protected]

11 SANDAG Attachment 1 Summary of Portfolio Balances (by Institution) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Book Percent of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

BANK OF AMERICA $ 4,803,643 0.52%$ 4,803,643 100.00%$ - N/A 1

US BANK, N.A. 32,493,658 3.54% 32,493,658 100.00% - N/A 1

WELLS FARGO BANK 31,269 0.00% 31,269 100.00% - N/A 1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) 41,220,244 4.49% 41,220,244 100.00% - 0.26% 200 **

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO 371,881,650 40.51% 370,800,173 99.71% (1,081,478) 0.52% 488

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO 79,026,845 8.61% 79,026,845 100.00% - 0.03% 33 **

US BANK 32,834,128 3.58% 32,834,128 100.00% - 0.08% 62

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO 186,640,328 20.33% 185,091,406 99.17% (1,548,922) 0.86% 707

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO 1,021,324 0.11% 1,021,324 100.00% - 0.01% 1

SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND 165,381,384 18.02% 165,381,384 100.00% - 0.45% 355 **

DWS MONEY MARKET SERIES INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS 268,764 0.03% 268,764 100.00% - 0.04% 42 **

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST 1,577,902 0.17% 1,577,902 100.00% - 0.10% 1

CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE 721,868 0.08% 721,868 100.00% - 0.45% 1

TOTAL $ 917,903,007 100.00%$ 915,272,608 99.71%$ (2,630,400) 0.51% 419 ** Although average days to maturity is greater than one day, funds are available at par the same day.

Summary of Portfolio Balances (by Agency)

Wtd. Avg. Book Percent of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Agency Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

SANDAG FUNDS $ 69,829,174 7.61%$ 69,748,240 99.88%$ (80,935) 0.34% 221

ARJIS FUNDS (Automated Regional Justice Information System) 6,567,126 0.72% 6,567,126 100.00% - 0.20% 162

SOURCEPOINT FUNDS 8,967,820 0.98% 8,967,820 100.00% - 0.45% 341

CORONADO BRIDGE TOLL FUNDS 277,498 0.03% 277,498 100.00% - 0.05% 52

RTC FUNDS (San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission) 832,261,389 90.67% 829,711,924 99.69% (2,549,465) 0.52% 438

TOTAL $ 917,903,007 100.00%$ 915,272,608 99.71%$ (2,630,400) 0.51% 419

Note: In addition to the funds held above, there is $4,750 petty cash held at SANDAG.

12 Attachment 2 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of December 31, 2014

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

BANK OF AMERICA: Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 132,766 0.01% $ 132,766 100.00% $ - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG General 4,237,903 0.46% 4,237,903 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) 3,679 0.00% 3,679 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak® 186,807 0.02% 186,807 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct 176,585 0.02% 176,585 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint 4,681 0.00% 4,681 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - ARJIS 61,222 0.01% 61,222 100.00% - N/A 1

TOTAL BANK OF AMERICA $ 4,803,643 0.52% $ 4,803,643 100.00% $ - N/A 1

US BANK, N.A. Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 19,132,201 2.08% $ 19,132,201 100.00% $ - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG General 9,363,467 1.02% 9,363,467 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) 55,452 0.01% 55,452 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak® 1,489,846 0.16% 1,489,846 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct 522,964 0.06% 522,964 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint 226,248 0.02% 226,248 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint 118,016 0.01% 118,016 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - ARJIS 192,344 0.02% 192,344 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Payment Account 1,288,491 0.14% 1,288,491 100.00% - N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Collection Account 104,628 0.01% 104,628 100.00% - N/A 1

TOTAL US BANK, N.A. $ 32,493,658 3.54% $ 32,493,658 100.00% $ - N/A 1

WELLS FARGO BANK: Checking - SR125 Payment Account $ 11,169 0.00% $ 11,169 100.00% $ - N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Collection Account 20,101 0.00% 20,101 100.00% - N/A 1

TOTAL WELLS FARGO BANK $ 31,269 0.00% $ 31,269 100.00% $ - N/A 1

13 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of December 31, 2014

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

STATE OF CA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): TransNet (RTC) $ 38,354,221 4.18%$ 38,354,221 100.00%$ - 0.26% 200 SANDAG 2,866,024 0.31% 2,866,024 100.00% - 0.26% 200

TOTAL LAIF $ 41,220,244 4.49%$ 41,220,244 100.00%$ - 0.26% 200 **

CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP): INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO: TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) $ 174,075,824 18.96%$ 173,235,245 99.52%$ (840,579) 0.72% 657 TransNet 2008 Bond Proceeds A/B/C/D Reserve Fund (RTC) 17,152,294 1.87% 17,103,525 99.72% (48,768) 0.54% 653 Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 876,169 0.10% 836,233 95.44% (39,936) 0.41% 288 TransNet 2014 Bond Proceeds Series A Project (RTC) 153,799,680 16.76% 153,728,419 99.95% (71,260) 0.31% 283 SANDAG Toll Rd Project Major Main Reserve Acct 18,607,487 2.03% 18,554,583 99.72% (52,905) 0.46% 386 SANDAG Toll Rd Project Extraordinary Reserve Acct 7,370,197 0.80% 7,342,167 99.62% (28,029) 0.67% 669

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO $ 371,881,650 40.51%$ 370,800,173 99.71%$ (1,081,478) 0.52% 488

CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO: I-15 FasTrak® $ 619,380 0.07% $ 619,380 100.00% $ - 0.05% 52 ARJIS 3,878,907 0.42% 3,878,907 100.00% - 0.05% 52 California Coastal Commission 1,007,777 0.11% 1,007,777 100.00% - 0.05% 52 SANDAG SR -125 1,846,122 0.20% 1,846,122 100.00% - 0.05% 52 SANDAG Toll Road Project Maint 8,469,070 0.92% 8,469,070 100.00% - 0.05% 52 Coronado Bridge Toll Funds 277,498 0.03% 277,498 100.00% - 0.05% 52 SANDAG Toll Road Extraordinary Reserve 1,403,532 0.15% 1,403,532 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Reserve Fund (RTC) 47,145 0.01% 47,145 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2008 Bond Series A - Principal (RTC) 1 0.00% 1 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2008 Bond Series B - Principal (RTC) 1 0.00% 1 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2008 Bond Series C - Principal (RTC) 1 0.00% 1 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2008 Bond Series D - Principal (RTC) 1 0.00% 1 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2010 Bond Series B - Principal (RTC) 465,114 0.05% 465,114 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2010 Bond Series B - Interest (RTC) 89,755 0.01% 89,755 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2010 Bond Series A - Interest (RTC) 5,010,019 0.55% 5,010,019 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2012 Bond Series A - Interest (RTC) 4,667,334 0.51% 4,667,334 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2012 Bond Series A - Principal (RTC) 11,155,384 1.22% 11,155,384 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2008 Sales Tax Account - TransNet Extension (RTC) 8,629,902 0.94% 8,629,902 100.00% - 0.05% 52 Wetland Mitigation TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) 290,897 0.03% 290,897 100.00% - 0.05% 52 Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) 81,177 0.01% 81,177 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2014 Bond Series A - Project (RTC) 1,846,399 0.20% 1,846,399 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2014 Bond Series A - Interest (RTC) 5,521,799 0.60% 5,521,799 100.00% - 0.05% 52

14 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of December 31, 2014

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

2014 Bond Series A Project Del Mar Fund (RTC) 2,793,657 0.30% 2,793,657 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2014 Bond Series A Project San Marcos Fund (RTC) 15,583,662 1.70% 15,583,662 100.00% - 0.05% 52 2014 Bond Series A Project Santee Fund (RTC) 5,342,311 0.58% 5,342,311 100.00% - 0.05% 52

TOTAL CASH RESERVE PORTFOLIO $ 79,026,845 8.61% $ 79,026,845 100.00% $ - 0.03% 33 **

TOTAL CAMP $ 450,908,495 49.11%$ 449,827,018 99.76%$ (1,081,478) 0.44% 408

US BANK: SANDAG - Toll Road Project Revenue $ 271,552 0.03% $ 271,552 100.00% $ - 0.05% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Capital Expenditure Reserve 354,603 0.04% 354,603 100.00% - 0.05% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Expense Fund - TIFIA Note Expense Acct 10,011 0.00% 10,011 100.00% - 0.05% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Senior Obligation Debt Service - Interest 848 0.00% 848 100.00% - 0.05% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project Senior Obligation Debt Service - Principal 119 0.00% 119 100.00% - 0.05% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Proj First Subord Obl TransNet Payment 314 0.00% 314 100.00% - 0.05% 1 SANDAG - Toll Road Project SANDAG Distribution 1,000,287 0.11% 1,000,287 100.00% - 0.05% 1 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 2008 Bond Series B Interest (RTC) 2,232 0.00% 2,232 100.00% - 0.05% 1 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 2008 Bond Ser A/B/C/D Interest SWAP (RTC) 224 0.00% 224 100.00% - 0.05% 1 2008 Bond Series A/B/C/D Main Interest (RTC) 1,251,442 0.14% 1,251,442 100.00% - 0.03% 1 Commercial Paper Series B - NCTD Interest (RTC) 230,428 0.03% 230,428 100.00% - 0.03% 1 NCTD Certificates of Participation 29,350,000 3.20% 29,350,000 100.00% - 0.08% 69 2014 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Ser A Cost of Isssuance (RTC) 133,952 0.01% 133,952 100.00% - 0.03% 1 Sales Tax Revenue CP Notes Series B Interest (RTC) 9,660 0.00% 9,660 100.00% - 0.00% 1 Sales Tax Revenue CP Notes Series B Principal (RTC) 218,443 0.02% 218,443 100.00% - 0.00% 1 Custody Account (RTC) 13 0.00% 13 100.00% - 0.00% 1

TOTAL US BANK $ 32,834,128 3.58% $ 32,834,128 100.00% $ - 0.08% 62

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON: INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO: TransNet Extension (RTC) $ 186,640,328 20.33%$ 185,091,406 99.17%$ (1,548,922) 0.86% 707

TOTAL INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO $ 186,640,328 20.33%$ 185,091,406 99.17%$ (1,548,922) 0.86% 707

CASH RESERVE: TransNet Extension (RTC) $ 1,021,324 0.11% $ 1,021,324 100.00% $ - 0.01% 1

TOTAL CASH RESERVE $ 1,021,324 0.11% $ 1,021,324 100.00% $ - 0.01% 1

TOTAL THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON $ 187,661,652 20.44%$ 186,112,730 99.17%$ (1,548,922) 0.86% 703

15 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Account) as of December 31, 2014

Percent Wtd. Avg. Book of Market Market Unrealized Yield on Days to Institution / Account Value Portfolio Value Price Gain/(Loss) Cost Maturity

SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND: SourcePoint Cash Reserve Fund $ 8,618,875 0.94%$ 8,618,875 100.00%$ - 0.45% 355 TransNet Extension (RTC) 49,155,199 5.36% 49,155,199 100.00% - 0.45% 355 2014 Sales Tax Bonds Project (RTC) 99,200,431 10.81% 99,200,431 100.00% - 0.45% 355 ARJIS 2,434,653 0.27% 2,434,653 100.00% - 0.45% 355 SANDAG SAFE Program 5,972,227 0.65% 5,972,227 100.00% - 0.45% 355

TOTAL SAN DIEGO COUNTY TREASURER'S POOLED MONEY FUND $ 165,381,384 18.02%$ 165,381,384 100.00%$ - 0.45% 355 **

DWS MONEY MARKET SERIES INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS: California Boating & Waterways $ 268,764 0.03%$ 268,764 100.00%$ - 0.04% 42 **

TOTAL DWS MONEY MARKET SERIES INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS $ 268,764 0.03%$ 268,764 100.00%$ - 0.04% 42

CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST Capital Project Retention Accounts $ 1,577,902 0.17%$ 1,577,902 100.00%$ - 0.10% 1

TOTAL CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST $ 1,577,902 0.17%$ 1,577,902 100.00%$ - 0.10% 1

CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE Capital Project Retention Account $ 721,868 0.08%$ 721,868 100.00%$ - 0.45% 1 TOTAL CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE $ 721,868 0.08%$ 721,868 100.00%$ - 0.45% 1

TOTAL $ 917,903,007 100.00%$ 915,272,608 99.71%$ (2,630,400) 0.51% 419

Legend: Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) Commercial Paper (CP) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) North County Transit District (NCTD) San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) ** Although average days to maturity is greater than one day, funds are available at par the same day.

16 Attachment 3

SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Cash and cash equivalents: Demand deposits: Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) N/A N/A$ 132,766 $ 132,766 $ - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG General N/A N/A 4,237,903 4,237,903 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) N/A N/A 3,679 3,679 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak® N/A N/A 186,807 186,807 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct N/A N/A 176,585 176,585 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint N/A N/A 4,681 4,681 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - ARJIS N/A N/A 61,222 61,222 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Payment Account N/A N/A 11,169 11,169 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Collection Account N/A N/A 20,101 20,101 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - TransNet Sales Tax (RTC) N/A N/A 19,132,201 19,132,201 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG General N/A N/A 9,363,467 9,363,467 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Flexible Spending Acct (FSA) N/A N/A 55,452 55,452 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG Interstate 15 (I-15) FasTrak® N/A N/A 1,489,846 1,489,846 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SANDAG SAFE Program Acct N/A N/A 522,964 522,964 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint N/A N/A 226,248 226,248 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SourcePoint N/A N/A 118,016 118,016 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - ARJIS N/A N/A 192,344 192,344 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Payment Account N/A N/A 1,288,491 1,288,491 - N/A NR NR N/A 1 Checking - SR125 Collection Account N/A N/A 104,628 104,628 - N/A NR NR N/A 1

Total demand deposits $ 37,328,570 $ 37,328,570 $ - N/A NR NR N/A 1

Money market accounts and funds: Money Market - Capital Project Retention Account N/A N/A $ 1,577,902 $ 1,577,902 $ - N/A NR NR 0.10% 1 Money Market - Capital Project Retention Account N/A N/A 721,868 721,868 - N/A NR NR 0.45% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Revenue Fund N/A N/A 271,552 271,552 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Cap Exp Reserve N/A N/A 354,603 354,603 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project TIFIA Note Expense N/A N/A 10,011 10,011 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Sr. Oblig. D/S - Interest N/A N/A 848 848 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project Sr. Oblig. D/S - Princ. N/A N/A 119 119 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project 1st Sub Obl TNet Pymt N/A N/A 314 314 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - SANDAG Toll Road Project SANDAG Distribution N/A N/A 1,000,287 1,000,287 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (SourcePoint) N/A N/A 8,618,875 8,618,875 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.45% 355 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (RTC) N/A N/A 49,155,199 49,155,199 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.45% 355 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (RTC) N/A N/A 99,200,431 99,200,431 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.45% 355 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (ARJIS) N/A N/A 2,434,653 2,434,653 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.45% 355 San Diego County Treasurer's Pooled Money Fund (SAFE) N/A N/A 5,972,227 5,972,227 - N/A AAAf / S1 NR 0.45% 355 Money Market - RTC (2008 Bond Ser B Interest) N/A N/A 2,232 2,232 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1

17 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Money Market - RTC (2008 Bond Ser A/B/C/D Interest SWAP) N/A N/A 224 224 - N/A NR NR 0.05% 1 Money Market - RTC (2008 Bond - Main Interest) N/A N/A 1,251,442 1,251,442 - N/A NR NR 0.03% 1 Money Market - RTC (CP Series B - NCTD) N/A N/A 230,428 230,428 - N/A NR NR 0.03% 1 Money Market - RTC (2014 Tax Revenue - Ser A COI) N/A N/A 133,952 133,952 - N/A N/R NR 0.03% 1 Money Market - RTC (2014 Bond - Ser A Cost of Issuance) N/A N/A 9,660 9,660 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1 Money Market - RTC (CP Interest Payment) N/A N/A 218,443 218,443 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1 Money Market - RTC (Custody Account) N/A N/A 13 13 - N/A NR NR 0.00% 1 DWS Money Mrkt Srs Institution - CA Boating & Waterways N/A N/A 268,764 268,764 - N/A AAAm Aaa-mf 0.04% 42 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (ARJIS) N/A N/A 3,878,907 3,878,907 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - CA Coastal Commission N/A N/A 1,007,777 1,007,777 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (SANDAG SR-125) N/A N/A 1,846,122 1,846,122 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (SANDAG SR-125) - Project Maint N/A N/A 8,469,070 8,469,070 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - Coronado Bridge Toll Funds N/A N/A 277,498 277,498 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (SANDAG SR-125) - Extraordinary Reserv N/A N/A 1,403,532 1,403,532 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (I-15 FasTrak®) N/A N/A 619,380 619,380 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Reserve N/A N/A 47,145 47,145 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser A Principal N/A N/A 1 1 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser B Principal N/A N/A 1 1 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser C Principal N/A N/A 1 1 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2008 Bond Ser D Principal N/A N/A 1 1 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2010 Bond Ser B Principal N/A N/A 465,114 465,114 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2010 Bond Ser B Interest N/A N/A 89,755 89,755 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2010 Bond Ser A Interest N/A N/A 5,010,019 5,010,019 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2012 Bond Interest N/A N/A 4,667,334 4,667,334 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2012 Bond Principal N/A N/A 11,155,384 11,155,384 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - Sales Tax N/A N/A 8,629,902 8,629,902 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - Wetland Mitigation (RTC) N/A N/A 290,897 290,897 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio - Sage Hill Endowment (RTC) N/A N/A 81,177 81,177 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Project N/A N/A 1,846,399 1,846,399 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Interest N/A N/A 5,521,799 5,521,799 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Proj Del Mar N/A N/A 2,793,657 2,793,657 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Proj San Marcos N/A N/A 15,583,662 15,583,662 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 CAMP Cash Reserve Portfolio (RTC) - 2014 Bond Ser A Proj Santee N/A N/A 5,342,311 5,342,311 - N/A AAAm NR 0.05% 52 BNY Mellon Cash Reserve TransNet Extension (RTC) N/A N/A 1,021,324 1,021,324 - N/A NR NR 0.01% 1

Total money market accounts and funds $ 251,482,214 $ 251,482,214 $ - N/A 0.31% 250

Total cash and cash equivalents $ 288,810,784 $ 288,810,784 $ - N/A N/A 218

Investments:

18 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

State of CA Local Agency Investment Fund: LAIF - TransNet (RTC) N/A N/A$ 38,354,221 $ 38,354,221 $ - N/A NR NR 0.26% 200 LAIF - SANDAG N/A N/A 2,866,024 2,866,024 - N/A NR NR 0.26% 200

Total State of CA Local Agency Investment Fund $ 41,220,244 $ 41,220,244 $ - N/A 0.26% 200

U.S. Agencies: Fannie Mae Global Notes 06/13/2012 10/14/2016$ 17,152,294 $ 17,103,525 $ (48,768) $ 17,040,000 AA+ Aaa 0.54% 653 US Treasury Notes 09/10/2014 09/30/2015 9,878,671 9,839,761 (38,910) 9,765,000 AA+ Aaa 0.15% 273 US Treasury Notes 09/10/2014 01/31/2016 8,079,644 8,031,554 (48,090) 7,891,000 AA+ Aaa 0.27% 396 US Treasury Notes 09/11/2014 07/31/2016 4,132,569 4,101,690 (30,879) 3,933,000 AA+ Aaa 0.54% 578 US Treasury Notes 09/10/2014 12/31/2016 2,970,292 2,974,111 3,819 2,963,000 AA+ Aaa 0.77% 731 US Treasury Notes 09/10/2014 03/31/2017 3,109,324 3,113,079 3,755 3,100,000 AA+ Aaa 0.88% 821 Fannie Mae Global Notes 09/10/2014 07/02/2015 7,004,443 6,992,497 (11,946) 6,986,000 AA+ Aaa 0.17% 183 FFCB Motes 09/10/2014 10/19/2015 15,100,000 15,089,460 (10,540) 15,100,000 AA+ Aaa 0.24% 292 FHLB Notes 09/10/2014 11/30/2015 25,655,882 25,650,054 (5,827) 25,670,000 AA+ Aaa 0.27% 334 Federal Home Loan Bank Global Notes 09/10/2014 02/19/2016 7,984,441 7,982,437 (2,004) 7,985,000 AA+ Aaa 0.38% 415 Fannie Mae Global Notes 09/10/2014 03/30/2016 3,829,329 3,829,826 497 3,826,000 AA+ Aaa 0.44% 455 FHLB Notes 09/10/2014 09/28/2016 3,088,220 3,091,782 3,562 3,100,000 AA+ Aaa 0.69% 637 Federal Home Loan Bank Global Notes 09/10/2014 06/21/2017 3,065,242 3,072,517 7,276 3,070,000 AA+ Aaa 1.06% 903 US Treasury Notes 07/15/2014 01/31/2016 1,981,567 1,964,377 (17,190) 1,930,000 AA+ Aaa 0.27% 396 US Treasury Notes 07/15/2014 04/30/2016 1,994,766 1,994,689 (77) 1,995,000 AA+ Aaa 0.38% 486 FHLMC Notes 07/15/2014 10/14/2016 1,991,068 1,987,381 (3,687) 1,980,000 AA+ Aaa 0.62% 653 Fannie Mae Global Notes 07/15/2014 01/30/2017 2,673,845 2,663,668 (10,177) 2,640,000 AA+ Aaa 0.74% 761 US Treasury Notes 07/15/2014 06/30/2016 1,999,736 1,989,553 (10,183) 1,960,000 AA+ Aaa 0.46% 547 US Treasury Notes 07/15/2014 06/30/2017 1,254,143 1,255,275 1,132 1,260,000 AA+ Aaa 0.91% 912 Fannie Mae Global Notes 07/15/2014 01/30/2017 2,638,136 2,628,354 (9,782) 2,605,000 AA+ Aaa 0.74% 761 US Treasury Notes 11/30/2012 11/15/2015 1,262,329 1,166,221 (96,108) 1,125,000 AA+ Aaa 0.35% 319 US Treasury Notes 10/02/2014 01/31/2016 3,985,224 3,964,378 (20,846) 3,895,000 AA+ Aaa 0.25% 396 US Treasury Notes 04/11/2013 04/30/2016 598,678 582,024 (16,655) 570,000 AA+ Aaa 0.34% 485 US Treasury Notes 12/17/2014 04/30/2016 3,619,235 3,614,673 (4,562) 3,540,000 AA+ Aaa 0.36% 485 US Treasury Notes 04/11/2014 05/31/2016 359,434 356,371 (3,063) 350,000 AA+ Aaa 0.48% 486 US Treasury Notes 05/31/2013 05/31/2016 777,393 763,652 (13,740) 750,000 AA+ Aaa 0.52% 486 US Treasury Notes 05/15/2013 06/30/2016 1,278,960 1,222,918 (56,042) 1,175,000 AA+ Aaa 0.40% 516 US Treasury Notes 06/05/2014 07/31/2016 4,090,625 4,061,248 (29,377) 4,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.44% 577 US Treasury Notes 02/07/2014 07/31/2016 4,203,301 4,162,779 (40,522) 4,100,000 AA+ Aaa 0.48% 577 US Treasury Notes 02/28/2014 09/30/2016 957,023 937,688 (19,336) 900,000 AA+ Aaa 0.53% 638 US Treasury Notes 06/05/2014 10/31/2016 4,043,281 4,028,752 (14,529) 4,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.55% 639 US Treasury Notes 12/03/2013 11/30/2016 2,734,030 2,721,856 (12,174) 2,710,000 AA+ Aaa 0.58% 669 US Treasury Notes 11/01/2013 11/30/2016 5,636,486 5,504,730 (131,756) 5,295,000 AA+ Aaa 0.63% 669

19 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

US Treasury Notes 11/25/2014 12/31/2016 3,354,652 3,340,243 (14,408) 3,180,000 AA+ Aaa 0.61% 730 US Treasury Notes 07/31/2014 01/31/2017 2,805,359 2,808,095 2,735 2,800,000 AA+ Aaa 0.80% 761 US Treasury Notes 10/02/2014 04/30/2017 3,982,488 3,984,664 2,177 3,980,000 AA+ Aaa 0.85% 850 US Treasury Notes 06/05/2014 05/31/2017 1,725,105 1,725,105 - 1,735,000 AA+ Aaa 0.82% 881 US Treasury Notes 12/10/2014 06/30/2017 3,459,390 3,461,969 2,579 3,475,000 AA+ Aaa 0.93% 911 US Treasury Notes 11/03/2014 06/30/2017 4,145,785 4,134,438 (11,348) 4,150,000 AA+ Aaa 0.79% 912 US Treasury Notes 10/02/2014 07/31/2017 3,997,002 4,004,121 7,119 4,050,000 AA+ Aaa 0.97% 943 US Treasury Notes 11/25/2014 08/31/2017 3,473,613 3,466,642 (6,972) 3,500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.90% 974 US Treasury Notes 10/02/2014 09/30/2017 3,998,900 4,006,652 7,752 4,050,000 AA+ Aaa 1.05% 974 US Treasury Notes 12/30/2014 01/31/2018 1,682,934 1,686,320 3,387 1,700,000 AA+ Aaa 1.21% 1,126 Federal Home Loan Bank Global Notes 08/09/2013 08/28/2015 699,972 700,607 635 700,000 AA+ Aaa 0.38% 240 Freddie Mac Global Notes 07/31/2012 08/28/2015 2,402,784 2,404,121 1,337 2,400,000 AA+ Aaa 0.46% 240 Fannie Mae Global Notes 10/02/2014 10/15/2015 3,921,845 3,881,775 (40,070) 3,760,000 AA+ Aaa 0.21% 288 FHLB (ex-callable) Global Notes 12/30/2013 12/30/2015 3,348,995 3,350,734 1,739 3,350,000 AA+ Aaa 0.39% 364 Federal Home Loan Bank Global Notes 03/18/2014 02/19/2016 2,800,028 2,799,101 (927) 2,800,000 AA+ Aaa 0.37% 415 Federal Home Loan Bank Global Notes 02/07/2014 02/19/2016 4,100,246 4,098,684 (1,562) 4,100,000 AA+ Aaa 0.37% 415 Fannie Mae Global Notes 11/25/2014 03/30/2016 3,397,729 3,393,390 (4,339) 3,390,000 AA+ Aaa 0.33% 455 Fannie Mae Global Notes 08/30/2013 03/30/2016 3,729,750 3,753,750 24,000 3,750,000 AA+ Aaa 0.71% 455 FNMA Notes 10/03/2013 09/28/2016 1,451,459 1,444,597 (6,861) 1,430,000 AA+ Aaa 0.74% 637 FNMA Notes 10/03/2013 09/28/2016 1,542,466 1,535,516 (6,949) 1,520,000 AA+ Aaa 0.75% 637 FHLB Notes 10/29/2014 09/28/2016 1,655,563 1,650,613 (4,950) 1,655,000 AA+ Aaa 0.48% 637 FHLB Notes 08/07/2014 09/28/2016 2,224,983 2,224,088 (894) 2,230,000 AA+ Aaa 0.61% 637 FHLB Notes 10/02/2014 09/28/2016 3,991,280 3,989,396 (1,884) 4,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.61% 637 Fannie Mae Global Notes 10/02/2014 01/30/2017 3,992,147 3,985,412 (6,735) 3,950,000 AA+ Aaa 0.79% 761 FHLMC Notes 11/25/2014 02/22/2017 3,391,965 3,385,479 (6,486) 3,380,000 AA+ Aaa 0.72% 843 Federal Home Loan Banks (Callable) 04/04/2014 03/27/2017 1,010,990 1,003,115 (7,875) 1,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.25% 817 FNMA Notes 11/25/2014 04/27/2017 3,426,384 3,418,965 (7,419) 3,400,000 AA+ Aaa 1.25% 849 Freddie Mac Global Notes 08/14/2014 07/28/2017 1,269,929 1,269,524 (405) 1,270,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 911 Freddie Mac Global Notes 08/14/2014 07/28/2017 2,579,827 2,579,033 (795) 2,580,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 911 FNMA Notes 08/25/2014 09/27/2017 1,818,485 1,821,324 2,840 1,825,000 AA+ Aaa 1.12% 940 Fannie Mae Global Notes 09/20/2013 10/15/2015 876,169 836,233 (39,935) 810,000 AA+ Aaa 0.41% 288 US Treasury 08/26/2011 10/31/2015 1,788,965 1,764,355 (24,610) 1,750,000 AA+ Aaa 0.71% 304 US Treasury 04/22/2014 05/31/2016 5,647,813 5,598,615 (49,198) 5,500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.47% 456 US Treasury 08/12/2011 07/31/2016 3,078,750 3,045,351 (33,399) 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.96% 578 US Treasury 05/23/2014 11/15/2016 3,003,281 2,999,532 (3,749) 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.58% 684 US Treasury 06/03/2014 11/15/2016 1,401,094 1,399,782 (1,312) 1,400,000 AA+ Aaa 0.59% 684 US Treasury 06/06/2014 03/31/2017 3,020,625 3,012,657 (7,968) 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.75% 821 FHLB 08/11/2011 06/12/2015 2,156,240 2,024,178 (132,062) 2,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.80% 163 FNMA 03/19/2012 10/26/2015 1,282,750 1,264,290 (18,460) 1,250,000 AA+ Aaa 0.88% 299

20 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

FNMA 03/28/2014 07/05/2016 2,986,530 2,992,455 5,925 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.57% 552 FHLB 08/26/2014 08/26/2016 5,001,250 4,996,290 (4,960) 5,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.55% 604 FHLMC 09/19/2014 09/19/2016 4,499,550 4,494,834 (4,716) 4,500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.71% 628 FFCB 03/14/2014 09/23/2016 2,005,300 1,995,804 (9,496) 2,000,000 AA- Aaa 0.58% 632 FHLB 08/01/2014 09/28/2016 4,032,520 4,021,916 (10,604) 4,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.42% 637 FHLB 10/01/2014 09/28/2016 5,035,500 5,027,395 (8,105) 5,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.41% 637 FFCB 10/06/2014 10/06/2016 4,997,500 4,995,160 (2,340) 5,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.70% 645 FNMA 05/14/2013 11/14/2016 7,750,000 7,721,217 (28,784) 7,750,000 AA+ Aaa 0.55% 684 FHLB 04/22/2014 12/09/2016 5,625,180 5,590,981 (34,199) 5,500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.75% 709 FHLB 10/15/2013 03/10/2017 3,183,360 3,202,230 18,870 3,200,000 AA+ Aaa 1.03% 800 FHLMC 10/01/2014 03/30/2017 4,999,500 4,997,220 (2,280) 5,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 820 FHLMC 08/06/2012 05/12/2017 511,200 503,836 (7,365) 500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.77% 863 FHLB 08/26/2014 05/26/2017 4,000,000 3,988,488 (11,512) 4,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.10% 877 FHLMC 07/31/2012 06/29/2017 3,025,650 3,006,603 (19,047) 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.82% 911 FHLMC 11/28/2014 08/28/2017 6,000,000 5,988,000 (12,000) 6,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 971 FNMA 11/30/2012 09/20/2017 3,508,400 3,488,258 (20,143) 3,500,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 994 FNMA 12/05/2012 09/20/2017 1,002,750 996,645 (6,105) 1,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 994 FNMA 02/26/2013 09/20/2017 4,004,000 3,986,580 (17,420) 4,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.00% 994 FHLMC 03/27/2014 09/27/2017 2,000,000 1,997,196 (2,804) 2,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.15% 1,001 FHLB 11/28/2014 11/27/2017 4,500,000 4,493,475 (6,525) 4,500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.50% 1,062 FHLB 12/15/2014 12/08/2017 2,002,160 1,995,912 (6,248) 2,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.09% 1,073 FHLB 12/19/2014 12/18/2017 1,499,250 1,499,981 731 1,500,000 AA+ Aaa 1.12% 1,083 FHLMC 01/30/2013 01/12/2018 4,931,800 4,928,640 (3,160) 5,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.03% 1,108 FAMCA 01/25/2013 01/24/2018 2,499,375 2,485,765 (13,610) 2,500,000 AA+ Aaa 0.94% 1,120 FHLMC 02/26/2013 02/07/2018 2,470,712 2,461,162 (9,550) 2,455,000 AA+ Aaa 1.35% 1,134 FNMA 02/22/2013 02/08/2018 1,989,480 1,977,252 (12,228) 2,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.98% 1,135 FHLB 03/18/2013 03/09/2018 254,980 250,630 (4,350) 250,000 AA+ Aaa 0.96% 1,164 FNMA 05/29/2013 03/13/2018 3,033,720 3,004,962 (28,758) 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 0.87% 1,168 FNMA 07/22/2013 03/13/2018 400,760 400,662 (98) 400,000 AA+ Aaa 1.38% 1,168 FNMA 08/09/2013 03/13/2018 600,300 600,992 692 600,000 AA+ Aaa 1.47% 1,168 FNMA 06/14/2013 04/03/2018 2,968,800 2,978,412 9,612 3,000,000 AA+ Aaa 1.35% 1,189

Total U.S. Agencies $ 368,086,876 $ 366,764,297 $ (1,322,579) $ 365,184,000 0.62% 639

21 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Corporate Medium Term Notes: General Elec Cap Corp Global Notes 07/15/2014 07/02/2015$ 2,000,122 $ 1,987,411 $ (12,711) $ 1,975,000 AA+ A1 0.30% 183 Bank Of New York Mellon 07/15/2014 07/28/2016 1,978,982 1,961,979 (17,004) 1,920,000 A+ A1 0.78% 575 General Electric Co Corporate Notes 07/15/2014 12/11/2015 730,546 728,134 (2,412) 725,000 AA+ Aa3 0.45% 345 Bank of New York Mellon 07/15/2014 07/28/2016 211,298 209,482 (1,815) 205,000 A+ A1 0.78% 575 Bank of New York Mellon 07/15/2014 07/28/2016 536,338 531,369 (4,969) 520,000 A+ A1 0.74% 575 Walt Disney Co Global Notes 11/30/2012 12/01/2015 382,132 384,892 2,760 385,000 A A2 0.70% 335 Cisco Systems Inc. Global Notes 11/08/2013 02/22/2016 2,304,806 2,189,162 (115,644) 2,075,000 AA- A1 0.62% 418 Cisco Systems Inc. Global Notes 12/20/2013 02/22/2016 2,309,868 2,204,988 (104,880) 2,090,000 AA- A1 0.62% 418 Caterpillar Financial SE Notes 02/28/2013 02/26/2016 649,194 650,266 1,072 650,000 A A2 0.74% 422 PepsiCo Inc. Global Notes 02/28/2013 02/26/2016 709,752 710,371 619 710,000 A- A1 0.71% 422 JPMorgan Chase & Co Global Notes 02/26/2013 02/26/2016 1,997,580 2,005,232 7,652 2,000,000 A A3 1.17% 422 State Street Corp Note 10/06/2014 03/07/2016 3,514,342 3,483,178 (31,164) 3,400,000 A+ A1 0.49% 797 Apple Inc. Global Notes 05/03/2013 05/03/2016 638,842 639,306 465 640,000 AA+ Aa1 0.51% 489 IBM Corp Global Notes (Ex-Callable) 05/07/2013 05/06/2016 2,742,245 2,741,720 (525) 2,750,000 AA- Aa3 0.55% 492 Toyota Motor Credit Corp 05/17/2013 05/17/2016 1,099,549 1,101,733 2,184 1,100,000 AA- Aa3 0.81% 503 Chevron Corp Global Notes 11/21/2013 06/24/2016 3,529,410 3,514,421 (14,989) 3,507,000 AA Aa1 0.64% 541 JP Morgan Chase & Co Global Notes 10/06/2014 07/05/2016 1,488,339 1,475,090 (13,249) 1,435,000 A A3 1.00% 552 General Electric Capital Corp (Floating) 07/12/2013 07/12/2016 2,240,000 2,255,261 15,261 2,240,000 AA+ A1 0.93% 559 Wells Fargo and Company 07/29/2013 07/20/2016 769,261 772,553 3,293 770,000 A+ A2 1.28% 567 IBM Corp (Ex-Callable) 10/06/2014 07/22/2016 894,180 891,470 (2,710) 875,000 AA- Aa3 0.72% 569 American Express Credit Corp Note 10/06/2014 07/29/2016 3,526,635 3,515,246 (11,389) 3,500,000 A- A2 0.88% 576 Berkshire Hathaway Fin Global Notes 10/15/2013 08/15/2016 499,050 501,647 2,597 500,000 AA Aa2 1.02% 593 Berkshire Hathaway Fin Global Notes 08/15/2013 08/15/2016 1,419,247 1,424,676 5,429 1,420,000 AA Aa2 0.97% 593 American Honda Finance Global Notes 10/10/2013 10/07/2016 1,165,928 1,175,410 9,482 1,170,000 A+ A1 1.24% 646 Coca-Cola Co/The Global Notes 11/01/2013 11/01/2016 524,396 524,868 471 525,000 AA Aa3 0.79% 671 Berkshire Hathaway Fin (FLT) Global Notes 01/10/2014 01/10/2017 900,000 899,276 (724) 900,000 AA Aa2 0.39% 741 Pfizer Inc. Global Notes 06/03/2013 01/15/2017 2,695,680 2,689,292 (6,388) 2,700,000 AA A1 0.95% 745 PepsiCo Corp Notes 02/28/2014 02/22/2017 1,493,296 1,489,947 (3,349) 1,495,000 A- A1 0.99% 783 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Corp Notes 04/22/2014 04/21/2017 524,921 523,795 (1,127) 525,000 AA Aa2 1.01% 841 Apple Inc. Corp Note 05/06/2014 05/05/2017 2,098,887 2,104,675 5,788 2,100,000 AA+ Aa1 1.07% 825 Glaxosmithkline PLC Corp Notes 11/28/2014 05/08/2017 3,228,608 3,213,878 (14,730) 3,200,000 A+ A2 1.13% 828 US Bancorp (Callable) 11/28/2014 05/15/2017 3,238,688 3,223,882 (14,806) 3,200,000 A+ A1 1.15% 835 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note 05/16/2014 05/16/2017 779,587 777,054 (2,533) 780,000 AA- Aa3 1.14% 836 The Walt Disney Corporation Corp Note 06/02/2014 05/30/2017 1,192,849 1,187,914 (4,935) 1,195,000 A A2 0.94% 850 GE Capital 10/16/2012 01/09/2015 1,029,240 1,000,165 (29,075) 1,000,000 AA+ A1 0.82% 9 Berkshire Hathaway Fin Corp 01/26/2012 01/15/2015 4,474,400 4,004,640 (469,760) 4,000,000 AA Aa2 0.80% 15 IBM Corp 02/07/2012 02/06/2015 3,002,220 3,000,669 (1,551) 3,000,000 AA- Aa3 0.53% 37 Pfizer, Inc. 12/06/2013 03/15/2015 1,062,320 1,009,095 (53,225) 1,000,000 AA A1 0.44% 74

22 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

GE Capital 12/23/2011 06/29/2015 1,053,750 1,014,674 (39,076) 1,000,000 AA+ A1 1.91% 180 Wells Fargo 01/24/2014 07/01/2015 2,029,400 2,010,892 (18,508) 2,000,000 A+ A2 0.47% 182 Wal-Mart 01/19/2012 07/08/2015 1,049,330 1,009,567 (39,763) 1,000,000 AA Aa2 0.81% 189 US Bancorp 10/29/2010 07/27/2015 3,082,440 3,034,806 (47,634) 3,000,000 A+ A1 1.84% 208 GE Capital 12/23/2011 09/21/2015 1,472,581 1,394,600 (77,981) 1,360,000 AA+ A1 2.07% 264 Procter & Gamble 09/20/2011 11/15/2015 2,055,280 2,023,076 (32,204) 2,000,000 AA- Aa3 1.12% 319 Google Inc. 10/16/2012 05/19/2016 1,053,370 1,021,714 (31,656) 1,000,000 AA Aa2 0.62% 505 Wells Fargo 04/29/2014 07/20/2016 3,030,540 3,010,674 (19,866) 3,000,000 A+ A2 0.79% 567 Procter & Gamble 12/23/2011 08/15/2016 1,145,143 1,145,428 285 1,132,000 AA- Aa3 1.19% 593 Procter & Gamble 12/23/2011 08/15/2016 734,429 734,612 183 726,000 AA- Aa3 1.19% 593 The Coca-Cola Company 03/04/2014 09/01/2016 2,519,948 2,491,503 (28,445) 2,450,000 AA Aa3 0.64% 609 Toyota Motor Credit 10/04/2013 01/12/2017 5,420,085 5,383,993 (36,091) 5,285,000 AA- Aa3 1.25% 743 Apple Inc. 05/28/2014 05/05/2017 3,011,340 3,007,770 (3,570) 3,000,000 AA+ Aa1 0.92% 856 American Express Credit Corp 10/03/2014 06/05/2017 4,970,500 4,986,130 15,630 5,000,000 A- A2 1.35% 887 PepsiCo Inc. 02/19/2013 08/13/2017 3,004,200 2,994,390 (9,810) 3,000,000 A- A1 1.22% 956 Philip Morris Int'l 12/18/2012 08/21/2017 999,720 995,858 (3,862) 1,000,000 A A2 1.13% 964 IBM Corp 02/03/2014 09/14/2017 3,107,673 3,009,182 (98,491) 2,700,000 AA- Aa3 1.40% 988 USAA Auto Owner Trust 10/23/2014 12/15/2017 3,000,703 2,994,117 (6,586) 3,000,000 AAA Aaa 0.55% 1,080 Wal-Mart 05/31/2013 02/15/2018 720,498 678,200 (42,298) 600,000 AA Aa2 1.38% 1,142 Wal-Mart 04/16/2013 04/11/2018 500,215 494,266 (5,949) 500,000 AA Aa2 1.12% 1,197 Apple Inc. 08/05/2013 05/03/2018 1,925,040 1,968,378 43,338 2,000,000 AA+ Aa1 1.83% 1,219

Total Corporate Medium Notes $ 109,468,921 $ 108,107,974 $ (1,360,947) $ 106,935,000 0.96% 602

Commercial Paper: Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi Comm Paper 09/10/2014 01/08/2015 $ 7,494,750 $ 7,499,768 $ 5,018 $ 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.21% 8 BNP Paribas Finance Inc. Comm Paper 09/10/2014 03/09/2015 7,488,750 7,497,188 8,438 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.30% 68 Rabobank USA Fin Corp Comm Paper 09/10/2014 03/09/2015 7,491,758 7,497,345 5,588 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.22% 68 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Comm Paper 09/10/2014 05/08/2015 7,487,000 7,495,253 8,253 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.26% 128 General Elec Cap Corp Comm Paper 09/10/2014 05/08/2015 7,488,500 7,495,253 6,753 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.23% 128 JP Morgan Securities LLC Comm Paper 09/10/2014 06/05/2015 7,481,575 7,492,785 11,210 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.33% 156 UBS Finance Delaware LLC Comm Paper 09/10/2014 06/05/2015 7,483,808 7,491,420 7,612 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.29% 156 Canadian Imperial Holding Comm Paper 09/10/2014 06/05/2015 7,485,483 7,490,640 5,157 7,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.26% 156 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi Comm Paper 07/14/2014 01/09/2015 1,997,713 1,999,930 2,217 2,000,000 A-1 P-1 0.23% 9 JP Morgan Securities LLC Comm Paper 07/14/2014 04/07/2015 1,995,402 1,998,912 3,510 2,000,000 A-1 P-1 0.31% 97 BNP Paribas Finance Inc. Comm Paper 10/14/2014 07/10/2015 1,994,022 1,996,236 2,214 2,000,000 A-1 P-1 0.40% 191

23 SANDAG Detail of Portfolio Balances (by Investment Type) as of December 31, 2014

Wtd. Avg. Purchase Maturity Unrealized S&P Moody's Yield Days to Investment Date Date Book Value Market Value Gain / (Loss) Par Value Rating Rating on Cost Maturity

Abbey National Comm Paper 09/11/2014 03/09/2015 2,995,674 2,998,860 3,186 3,000,000 A-1 P-1 0.29% 68 UBS Finance Comm Paper 07/01/2014 03/27/2015 2,495,330 2,498,833 3,503 2,500,000 A-1 P-1 0.25% 178 ING Funding 11/03/2014 04/27/2015 2,995,917 2,997,603 1,686 3,000,000 A-1 P-1 0.28% 117

Total Commercial Paper $ 74,375,682 $ 74,450,024 $ 74,342 $ 74,500,000 0.27% 109

Municipal Bonds/Notes: University of Cal Txbl Revenue Bonds 10/02/2013 05/15/2015 $ 620,000 $ 620,062 $ 62 $ 620,000 AA Aa2 0.53% 135 CA ST Dept of Water Rev Bonds 09/27/2012 12/01/2015 620,000 621,401 1,401 620,000 AAA Aa1 0.65% 335

Total Municipal Bonds/Notes $ 1,240,000 $ 1,241,463 $ 1,463 $ 1,240,000 0.59% 235

Certificates of Deposits Toronto Dominion Bank NY CD 09/29/2014 09/29/2016 $ 2,560,000 $ 2,562,196 $ 2,196 $ 2,560,000 AA- Aa1 0.90% 606 US Bank NA Cincinnati (Callable) CD 09/11/2014 09/11/2017 2,790,500 2,765,625 (24,876) 2,795,000 AA- Aa3 1.41% 923

Total Certificates of Deposits $ 5,350,500 $ 5,327,821 (22,679) $ 5,355,000 1.17% 771

Certificates of Participation: North County Transit District Certificates of Participation 12/03/2014 03/10/2015 $ 29,350,000 $ 29,350,000 $ - $ 29,350,000 N/R A1,A2 0.08% 69

Total Certificates of Participation $ 29,350,000 $ 29,350,000 $ - $ 29,350,000 0.08% 69

Total investments $ 629,092,223 $ 626,461,823 $ (2,630,400) N/A 0.61% 513

Total Portfolio: $ 917,903,007 $ 915,272,608 $ (2,630,400) N/A 0.51% 419

Legend: Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) Commercial Paper (CP) State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) North County Transit District (NCTD) San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission (RTC)

24 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-5 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

REPORT SUMMARIZING DELEGATED ACTIONS File Number 8000100 TAKEN BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Introduction

Various Board Policies require the Executive Director to report certain actions to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis or upon taking specified actions.

Discussion

Board Policy No. 003

Board Policy No. 003: Investment Policy, states that a monthly report of all investment transactions shall be submitted to the Board of Directors. Attachment 1 contains the reportable investment transactions for December 2014.

Board Policy No. 008

Section 6 of Board Policy No. 008: Legal Matters, authorizes the Office of General Counsel or outside counsel to file documents and make appearances on behalf of SANDAG in court proceedings.

• On January 5, 2015, Best, Best & Krieger, LLP, acting on behalf of SANDAG, filed a Supplemental Opposition to Writ of Mandate with the Superior Court regarding Michael Robertson v. SANDAG (Superior Court Case No. 37-2013-00051297-CU-WM-CTL).

• On January 9, 2015, Katherine Contreras of the law firm Nossaman, LLP, appeared on behalf of SANDAG, at case management conferences related to the Inland Rail Trail in the matters of SANDAG v. Michael A Silva as Trustee of The Silva Family Living Trust (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00010139-CU-EI-NC), SANDAG v. Edna T Miller As Trustee Of The Edna T Meier Living Trust Dated March 29 2009 (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00010184-CU-EI-NC), SANDAG v. Moorehow Investments LLC (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00010182-CU- EI-NC, and SANDAG v. San Diego Gas and Electric (San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014- 00010136-CU-EI-NC).

• On February 5, 2015, the Sohagi Law Group, acting on behalf of SANDAG, filed a Reply to Answers to Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court regarding Cleveland National Forest Foundation et al. v. SANDAG (California Court of Appeal Case No. D063288).

• On February 5, 2015, Nossaman, LLP, acting on behalf of SANDAG, filed Respondent San Diego Association of Governments’ Answer to Petitioner and Plaintiff’s Verified Petition for Writ of

Mandate; Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in the United States District Court Southern District of California in the matter Friends of Rose Canyon v. SANDAG et al. (USDC Case No. 15-cv-00197-JAH-KSC).

Board Policy No. 017

Board Policy No. 017: Delegation of Authority, authorizes the Executive Director to take specified actions and requires those actions to be reported to the Board of Directors at the next regular meeting.

Section 4.1 of the Policy authorizes the Executive Director to enter into agreements not currently incorporated in the budget and to make other modifications to the budget in an amount up to $100,000 per transaction, so long as the overall budget remains in balance. Section 4.12 of the policy authorizes transfers of funds in the SANDAG budget for capital improvement projects (CIPs) following approval of such a transfer by the affected transit operator’s board of directors or designated governing body. Attachment 2 contains the actions for January 2015.

Section 4.3 authorizes the Executive Director to execute all right-of-way property transfer documents, including rights of entry, licenses, leases, deeds, easements, escrow instructions, and certificates of acceptance. The following reflects the approved documents for this reporting period:

• Inland Rail Trail Bikeway Project, CIP No. 1223023

No. Address Nature of Activity Date 179-185-05-00 (207 Valley View Place, 1. Escrow Instructions 1/28/15 Vista, CA 92083) Memorandum of Agreement/temporary 184-162-03-00 (1971 Buena Creek Road, 2. construction easement, 1/28/15 Vista, CA 92083) permanent easement/drainage/slope/deed

Board Policy No. 024

Board Policy No. 024: Procurement and Contracting – Construction Policy, Section 5.2, states that the Executive Director is delegated the authority to accept contracts on behalf of the Board of Directors and shall report to the Board all contract acceptances over $25,000. The following construction projects were accepted:

• In a letter dated January 23, 2015, ABC Construction, Inc. was granted Acceptance for the Lomas Santa Fe Interim Maintenance Project – Effective January 6, 2015 (JOC1431-08, CIP No. 1200502, Contract No. 5001431). The contract value was $447,955.27.

• In a letter dated January 30, 2015, ABC Construction, Inc. was granted Acceptance for the Jeffries Ranch Access Control Mitigation Project – Effective December 31, 2014 (JOC1431-32, CIP No. 1200214, Contract No. 5001431). The contract value was $378,295.22.

• In a letter dated February 6, 2015, Southwest Construction, Inc. was granted Acceptance for the Coastal Rail Trail Phase 2B Project – Effective January 30, 2015 (CIP No. 1223024, Contract No. 5001916). The contract value was $1,803,252.82.

2 • In a letter dated February 9, 2015, HMS Construction, Inc. was granted Acceptance for the Santa Margarita River Bridge – North County Transit District Pull Box Project – Effective October 25, 2014 (JOC1953-16, CIP No. 1141600, Contract No. 5001953). The contract value was $25,005.76.

Board Policy No. 035

Board Policy No. 035: Competitive Grant Program Procedures, authorizes the Executive Director to approve requests by grantees for project schedule extensions of up to six months. Extensions in excess of six months, or that will cause a project to miss a completion deadline in Section 1 (including those projects that already were granted extensions by the Executive Director and again are falling behind schedule), will be considered by the relevant Policy Advisory Committee. The Policy requires the Executive Director to report to the Board of Directors actions taken at the next regular meeting.

Grant extension approvals made by the Executive Director since the last Board meeting are summarized below:

Environmental Mitigation Program Extension Amendment Contract Grantee Project From To (in Months) Execution San Diego San Diego River 5001584 River 6 03/01/2015 09/01/2015 01/22/2015 Habitat Conservancy

Active Transportation Program Extension Amendment Contract Grantee Project From To (in Months) Execution San Diego River Trail - South 5001739 City of Santee 6 11/30/2014 05/31/2015 01/29/2015 Side of San Diego River San Diego River City of Trail - South 5001740 6 11/30/2014 05/31/2015 01/29/2015 San Diego Side of San Diego River

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Monthly Activity for Investment Securities Transactions for December 1 through December 31, 2014 2. January 2015 Budget Transfers and Amendments

Key Staff Contact: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1

MONTHLY ACTIVITY FOR INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR DECEMBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014

Yield to Transaction Maturity Par Original Maturity Date Date Security Value Cost at Cost BOUGHT 12/05/2014 06/30/2017 US TREASURY NOTES $ 3,475,000.00 $ 3,459,389.65 0.93% 12/15/2014 12/08/2017 FHLB 2,000,000.00 2,002,160.00 1.09% 12/16/2014 04/30/2016 US TREASURY NOTES 3,540,000.00 3,619,235.16 0.36% 12/19/2014 12/18/2017 FHLB 1,500,000.00 1,499,250.00 1.12% 12/29/2014 01/31/2018 US TREASURY NOTES 1,700,000.00 1,682,933.59 1.21%

TOTAL BOUGHT: $ 12,215,000.00 $ 12,262,968.40 0.85%

SOLD 12/05/2014 08/28/2015 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK GLOBAL $ 685,000.00 $ 684,972.60 0.38% ** 12/08/2014 05/01/2015 BNP PARIBAS FINANCE INC COMM PAPER 2,800,000.00 2,796,123.56 0.28% ** 12/13/2014 09/13/2017 FHLB 2,000,000.00 1,999,400.00 0.50% * 12/16/2014 04/18/2016 FHLMC GLOBAL REFERENCE NOTES 3,300,000.00 3,524,730.00 0.36% *** 12/19/2014 12/19/2016 FHLMC 1,500,000.00 1,521,150.00 1.00% * 12/29/2014 03/27/2017 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (CALLABLE) 1,085,000.00 1,096,924.15 1.25% **** 12/29/2014 04/28/2017 FHLB GLOBAL NOTE (CALLABLE) 615,000.00 621,826.50 1.25% ****

TOTAL SOLD: $ 11,985,000.00 $ 12,245,126.81 0.57%

* This security was called by the issuer. ** Proceeds from this sale were used to purchase new securities that would provide higher returns over a longer holding period. *** Proceeds from this sale, were used to purchase new securities that would provide a comparable yield to maturity and enhance the portfolio's safety and liquidity. **** Proceeds from this sale were used to purchase new securities that would provide comparable returns over a longer holding period.

4 Attachment 2

JANUARY 2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS AND AMENDMENTS in '000s

PROJECT CURRENT NEW NUMBER PROJECT NAME BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE EXPLANATION

Transferred funds from the Main Service Bureau project (7500000) 7500000 Service Bureau - Main Project FY 2014 $243.3 $236.6 ($6.7) to establish new projects and increase budgets for additional work.

Established new Service Bureau project for North Park Main Street 7512700 North Park Main Street Intercept Survey $0.0 $4.7 $4.7 Intercept Survey.

Established new Service Bureau project for Feasibility Study for Bay 7512800 Bay to Balboa Transportation Modeling $0.0 $2.0 $2.0 to Balboa Transportation Modeling.

Increased project budget to accommodate bids higher than engineer's estimate in accordance with North County Transit 1145000 Los Penasquitos Bridge Replacements $25,000.0 $30,602.4 $5,602.4 District (NCTD) Board action at its October 2014 meeting on agenda item no. 13 and November 2014 meeting on agenda item no. 6.

Transferred $5,602,400 from the San Onofre Bridge Replacements project to the Los Penasquitos Bridge Replacements project to 1145400 San Onofre Bridge Replacements $11,457.1 $5,854.7 ($5,602.4) accommodate bids higher than engineers estimate in accordance with NCTD Board action at its October 2014 meeting on agenda item no. 13 and November 2014 meeting on agenda item no. 6.

5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT ON TRANSPORTATION File Number 1500000 PROJECTS – OCTOBER THROUGH DECEMBER 2014

Introduction

This quarterly report summarizes the current status of major transit, highway, traffic management, and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects in the SANDAG five-year Regional Transportation Improvement Program. The TransNet one-half cent local sales tax and other local, state, and federal revenue sources fund these projects. The projects contained in this report previously have been prioritized and are included in the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan. All information shown in bold has changed from the previous quarter; this report will highlight some of those changes. This item is presented to the Board of Directors for information.

Discussion

TransNet Program

Attachment 1 – TransNet Extension Quarterly Report – indicates sales tax revenue available for allocation was approximately $68.6 million in the second quarter of FY 2015. Revenue for the second quarter of the fiscal year was 2 percent higher compared to the first quarter of FY 2015 ($67.1 million); in parallel, it was approximately 5.5 percent higher than the second quarter of last fiscal year ($65 million).

Transit Projects

Attachment 2 – Transit Projects – provides cost and schedule information on the major transit and rail projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 3 – Major Transit Projects) locates these projects.

State Route 15 Bus Rapid Transit Mid-City Centerline Stations (Project No. 1): This project was advertised for construction on December 2, 2014, with the construction contract expected to be awarded by March 2015, and construction anticipated to begin by April 2015. This project will construct Bus Rapid Transit stations in the median of State Route 15 (SR 15) at University Avenue and El Cajon Boulevard. These stations will connect riders to the Rapid and Rapid Express services along Interstate 15 (I-15) and Mid-City corridors and will include elevators, pedestrian walkways, shelters and next bus arrival signs. The stations are scheduled to be open to users by spring 2017. Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit: Old Town to University Towne Centre (Project No. 7): On November 21, 2014, the SANDAG Board of Directors certified the final Environmental Impact Report for this project, which completes the California Environmental Quality Act review process. An update to the funding proposal is scheduled to be sent to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in spring 2015 to seek approval from the FTA’s New Starts Program to fund approximately 50 percent of the project. Construction is scheduled to begin in early 2016, with service beginning approximately four years later.

Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Bridge Replacement (Project No. 9): Although the construction contract for this project was awarded in October 2014, all bids received were above engineer’s estimates; the North County Transit District (NCTD) contributed $5 million in additional funds to increase the budget and ensure that the replacement of all four bridges can be completed. This project will replace four timber trestle bridges in order to support reliability of intercity, commuter, and freight rail services. The Notice to Proceed was provided in December 2014, and the first day of construction occurred in early January 2015. The bridges are expected to be open to service by spring 2017.

Active Transportation Projects

Attachment 4 – Active Transportation Projects (includes projects related to bicycle, pedestrian, and access to transit infrastructure) – provides cost and schedule information on the Active Transportation projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 5 – Major Active Transportation Projects) locates these projects.

Inland Rail Trail (Project No. 33): The design phase for the San Marcos portion, or Phase 1, is complete and advertisement is anticipated to occur by late March 2015. The Design phase for Phases 2 through 4 currently is scheduled to be completed by June 2015, with an anticipated advertise date in late summer 2015. At its February 6, 2015, meeting, the Transportation Committee approved the submission of a concept proposal for this project under the state cap-and-trade Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, with review and approval by the Board of Directors scheduled for February 27, 2015 (Agenda Item No. 17B).

State Route 15 Commuter Bike Facility (Project No. 41): In November 2014, a proposal to fund the construction phase of this project with TransNet Bicycle, Pedestrian and Neighborhood Safety, and Active Transportation Program funds was approved by the Board of Directors. This project will construct a one-mile bike path along the east side of SR 15 from Adams Avenue to Camino Del Rio South and will include a concrete barrier to separate cyclists from motorized vehicles on the freeway. This project currently is scheduled to be advertised by May 2015, and will be open to users by early 2017.

Express/High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes and Direct Access Ramp Projects

Attachment 6 – Express/High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes and Direct Access Ramp (DAR) Projects – provides cost and schedule information on the major highway projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 7 – Express/HOV lanes and DAR Projects) locates these projects.

Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor: La Jolla Village Drive to Harbor Drive (Project No. 50): In August 2014, the California Coastal Commission unanimously approved the Public Works

2 Plan/Transportation and Resource Enhancement Program (PWP/TREP) for the North Coast Corridor Program. The PWP/TREP includes a package of highway, rail, transit, bike/pedestrian, environmental, and coastal access improvements along San Diego’s North Coast Corridor—a 27-mile stretch from La Jolla to Oceanside—over the next 30 years. The Federal Highway Administration signed the Record of Decision for the Interstate 5 (I-5) North Coast 4 Express Lanes Project in late January 2015, which signifies the fulfillment of the National Environmental Policy Act requirement for this portion of the North Coast Corridor Program.

Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor – Manchester Avenue to State Route 78 (Project No. 51): The completion of the design phase for this project has been revised to September 2015 due to a delay with the Construction Management/General Contractor process. This project is Phase 1 of the I-5 Express Lanes Project, which will add two Express Lanes in each direction from Manchester Avenue to State Route 78. This phase includes High Occupancy Vehicle lanes, including soundwalls, with construction currently scheduled to begin in late 2015 and be open to traffic by fall 2019.

Interstate 805 Managed Lanes – South (Project No. 56): Eight miles of new carpool lanes opened in March 2014 between East Naples Street in Chula Vista and State Route 94 in San Diego as part of the first phase of the Interstate 805 South Managed Lanes Project. The second phase, which includes the DAR along East Palomar Street, will connect to the carpool/Express Lanes. Due to some utility and drainage re-design issues, the open-to-traffic date for the DAR has been revised to August 2015.

Highway Projects

Attachment 8 – Highway Projects – provides cost and schedule information on the major highway projects in the San Diego region. The accompanying map (Attachment 9 – Major Highway Projects) locates these projects.

Interstate 5/Genesee Avenue Interchange (Project No. 60): Caltrans awarded the construction contract to Flatiron West Inc. in December 2014, and the groundbreaking ceremony occurred on February 13, 2015. This project will replace the existing six-lane Genesee Avenue overpass with a ten-lane structure that will accommodate current and future traffic demands. The project also will widen the freeway access ramps and construct a new, separated bicycle/pedestrian facility. This project is funded with federal, state, TransNet, and local funds, with construction scheduled to begin in February 2015 and open to traffic by fall 2017.

Traffic Demand Management and Intelligent Transportation System

Attachment 10 – Traffic Demand Management (TDM) and Intelligent Transportation System Projects (ITS) – provides cost and schedule information on the major traffic management and ITS projects in the San Diego region.

Centralized Train Control – Phase 3 Blue Line (Project No. 70): The Centralized Train Control system currently is operational and monitoring all of the Blue Line, which is a 15.4-mile segment from Downtown San Diego to San Ysidro. The system enhancements include monitoring of new signal indications, controls, field inputs, and communication interfaces, which help provide “Next Train Arrival” information to passengers via the public announcement and variable message signs at the Blue Line Trolley stations.

3 I-15 Integrated Corridor Management (Project No. 72): In 2010, SANDAG initiated the development of the system along the I-15 corridor. The overall vision of the Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Project is to improve mobility and reduce congestion by developing an integrated transportation management system that enhances multi-agency and multimodal coordination. This project was implemented in late 2014 in partnership with Caltrans; the cities of San Diego, Poway, and Escondido; the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and NCTD; and the U.S. Department of Transportation's Research and Innovative Technology Administration. The I-15 ICM Project was selected as one of two pilot sites in the nation to develop, implement, and operate an ICM system and will be the first-of-its-kind Decision Support System developed in the nation. The ICM system now is in full operation, and operations will continue through next year to complete the test pilot. iCommute Program: iCommute is the TDM Program of SANDAG. The iCommute Program provides convenient transportation choices that reduce auto dependency, vehicle energy consumption, and polluting emissions, while saving commuters time and money by providing free ride-matching services, the Regional Vanpool Program, transit solutions, bicycle encouragement programs, the Guaranteed Ride Home Program, SchoolPool, and support for teleworking. During the second quarter of FY 2015, iCommute programs contributed to reducing approximately 35.8 million pounds of carbon dioxide and saving an estimated 1.5 million gallons of fuel by reducing approximately 37 million vehicle miles traveled.

Community Outreach: iCommute actively promotes TDM programs to employers, schools, and commuters region wide. The employer outreach team met with 75 employers last quarter for outreach events and meetings to offer support for implementing or expanding commuter programs for their employees.

Rideshare 2014 was held throughout October to promote the benefits of commute alternatives. Fifty-one organizations representing more than 102,000 employees participated in the iCommute Corporate Challenge.

The Walk, Ride, and Roll to School Challenge and Walk and Bike to School Day took place in October 2014 to promote safe walking, biking, carpooling, and taking transit to school. Participating schools that logged trips were eligible to win money for school supplies.

SANDAG Regional Vanpool Program: The number of vanpools increased from last quarter, from 705 vans in the first quarter to 723 vans this quarter, with more than 5,500 passengers. The Vanpool Program reduced nearly 90,000 single occupant vehicle trips and over 34 million vehicle miles this quarter.

511 Services: The 511 application provides real-time access to traveler information supplied by Caltrans and MTS, along with roadway information from the cities of San Diego, Escondido, and Poway, which include maps with current traffic conditions, latest incident information, current toll rates for the I-15 Express Lanes, estimated travel times, congestion information, and special event information. Future updates to the application will include transit arrival times, NCTD transit information, and a “my commute” feature, which will allow users to program their route(s) to receive customized alerts at their chosen travel time.

4 During the second quarter of FY 2015, 511 received approximately 127,000 calls. The most requested option continues to be “Traffic Conditions,” which accounted for approximately 33 percent of total calls this quarter. The 511 service continues to be utilized as a one-stop resource that consolidates San Diego region transportation information into easily accessible phone and website systems.

The 511 web portal page views averaged 1,690 per day; the 511 traffic page averaged 1,300 page views per day. The transit page continues to be the most heavily visited 511-related page, amounting to 47 percent of total visits for the quarter.

Freeway Service Patrol

Attachment 11 – Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) Assists Map – summarizes the number of assists by the FSP. The FSP trucks (25 tow trucks and 9 light-duty trucks) patrol approximately 242 miles of San Diego freeways, as shown in Attachment 11. The FSP trucks operate during weekday peak periods from 5:30 to 9:30 a.m. and from 3 to 7 p.m., excluding holidays. A pilot expansion, which began in 2012, increased FSP operations beyond peak periods to help stranded motorists during midday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. along Interstates 5, 8, 15, and 805.

In addition, weekend FSP service is available in most of the region from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. The pilot expansion will continue as long as funds are available. Findings from the pilot will enable SANDAG to further fine-tune the program to improve efficiency. During the second quarter of FY 2015, this program assisted approximately 21,000 motorists, a decrease of 16 percent over last quarter (25,000 assists), which includes approximately 2,500 motorists during weekend beats – a 22 percent decrease from last quarter (3,200 motorists) in the San Diego region. The decrease in service is attributed to less service days and holiday furloughs, which is common during this quarter.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. TransNet Extension Quarterly Report 2. Transit Projects 3. Major Transit Projects (map) 4. Active Transportation Projects 5. Major Active Transportation Projects (map) 6. Express/HOV lanes and DARs Projects 7. Major Express/HOV Lanes and DARs Projects (map) 8. Highway Projects 9. Major Highway Projects (map) 10. Traffic Management and Intelligent Transportation System Projects 11. Freeway Service Patrol Assists (map)

Key Staff Contact: Michelle Smith, (619) 595-5608, [email protected]

5 Attachment 1 TransNet EXTENSION QUARTERLY REPORT

FISCAL YEAR: FY 2015 QUARTER:2

TransNet Allocations Fund Disbursements

2 Sales Tax Allocations Other Total Program Disbursements Debt Service3 Total Income 1 Allocation Disbursements

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date SANDAG Admin $686,018 $1,356,917 $15,274,621 $138,542 $15,413,163 $(685,000) $(1,525,000) $(15,067,255) $0 $0 $0 $(15,067,255)

ITOC $95,509 $191,018 $1,539,860 $18,372 $1,558,232 $(51,130) $(147,609) $(1,155,187) $0 $0 $0 $(1,155,187)

Bicycle/Pedestrian/Neighborhood Safety $1,372,037 $2,713,835 $30,549,241 $3,505,480 $34,054,721 $(804,701) $(805,529) $(18,712,009) $0 $0 $0 $(18,712,009)

Major Corridor Capital Projects $25,250,342 $49,943,387 $562,437,370 $(43,033,615) $519,403,755 $(40,832,247) $(54,494,115) $(1,493,931,768) $(13,552,141) $(58,993,177) $(421,665,685) $(1,915,597,453)

Major Corridor Project EMP $2,923,724 $5,782,919 $65,124,327 $(14,285) $65,110,042 $(3,410,673) $(4,204,662) $(149,433,262) $(3,829,794) $(19,048,855) $(106,665,222) $(256,098,484)

Local Project EMP $1,196,069 $2,365,739 $26,641,770 $574,838 $27,216,608 $(410) $(1,141) $(8,430,489) $0 $0 $0 $(8,430,489)

Smart Growth Incentive Program $1,395,414 $2,760,029 $31,082,065 $617,268 $31,699,333 $(479) $(1,331) $(8,569,711) $0 $0 $0 $(8,569,711)

Local Streets and Roads

City of Carlsbad $680,390 $1,345,857 $14,898,324 $7,937,691 $22,836,015 $(232) $(644) $(6,134,084) $0 $0 $0 $(6,134,084)

City of Chula Vista $1,403,417 $2,775,754 $29,585,789 $4,047,899 $33,633,688 $(483) $(2,741,343) $(19,120,682) $0 $0 $0 $(19,120,682)

City of Coronado $141,687 $280,488 $3,205,206 $807,381 $4,012,587 $(50,044) $(150,124) $(2,759,337) $0 $0 $0 $(2,759,337)

City of Del Mar $53,286 $105,661 $1,175,433 $161,964 $1,337,397 $(14) $(1,040) $(1,936,012) $(35,276) $(755,760) $(755,966) $(2,691,978)

City of El Cajon $578,647 $1,144,643 $12,760,727 $2,246,831 $15,007,558 $(197) $(547) $(11,068,524) $0 $0 $0 $(11,068,524)

City of Encinitas $392,661 $776,828 $9,017,250 $3,502,239 $12,519,489 $(211,150) $(211,385) $(6,448,133) $0 $0 $0 $(6,448,133)

City of Escondido $848,576 $1,678,469 $18,810,617 $4,711,134 $23,521,751 $(1,517,451) $(1,517,968) $(10,973,184) $0 $0 $0 $(10,973,184)

City of Imperial Beach $166,972 $330,492 $3,873,303 $550,327 $4,423,630 $(735,329) $(735,424) $(4,305,895) $0 $0 $0 $(4,305,895)

City of La Mesa $372,837 $737,621 $8,290,189 $3,230,470 $11,520,659 $(400,126) $(850,348) $(9,931,422) $(134,721) $(320,858) $(1,374,359) $(11,305,781)

City of Lemon Grove $172,356 $341,140 $3,844,126 $542,627 $4,386,753 $(56) $(154) $(2,285,553) $0 $0 $0 $(2,285,553)

City of National City $335,213 $663,214 $7,470,160 $1,082,747 $8,552,907 $(112) $(311) $(9,536,507) $(96,226) $(192,418) $(6,234,334) $(15,770,841)

City of Oceanside $1,095,236 $2,166,279 $24,795,940 $8,229,088 $33,025,028 $(376) $(1,046) $(19,269,294) $0 $0 $0 $(19,269,294)

City of Poway $359,846 $711,929 $8,229,507 $1,141,859 $9,371,366 $(363,120) $(672,336) $(9,158,357) $0 $0 $0 $(9,158,357)

City of San Diego $7,627,426 $15,084,694 $170,918,206 $24,371,939 $195,290,145 $(6,873,874) $(7,181,004) $(133,695,939) $0 $0 $0 $(133,695,939)

City of San Marcos $506,941 $1,002,834 $11,024,668 $2,914,938 $13,939,606 $(172) $(354,957) $(22,613,280) $(328,080) $(847,800) $(2,951,340) $(25,564,620)

City of Santee $341,726 $676,094 $7,777,209 $1,059,044 $8,836,253 $(775,114) $(775,318) $(13,171,898) $(200,990) $(372,728) $(6,696,367) $(19,868,265)

City of Solana Beach $105,017 $207,966 $2,422,350 $428,080 $2,850,430 $(33) $(90) $(6,711,050) $(28,546) $(109,788) $(946,923) $(7,657,973)

6 10/01/14 - 12/31/14 FISCAL YEAR: FY 2015 QUARTER:2

TransNet Allocations Fund Disbursements

2 Sales Tax Allocations Other Total Program Disbursements Debt Service3 Total Income 1 Allocation Disbursements

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date City of Vista $544,193 $1,076,504 $12,175,656 $3,512,753 $15,688,409 $(50,184) $(50,513) $(8,378,227) $0 $0 $0 $(8,378,227)

San Diego County $3,610,021 $7,139,654 $80,433,957 $12,865,160 $93,299,117 $(3,085,250) $(4,337,473) $(75,347,353) $(324,510) $(661,617) $(8,783,829) $(84,131,182)

Total Local Streets and Roads $19,336,448 $38,246,121 $430,708,617 $83,344,171 $514,052,788 $(14,063,317) $(19,582,025) $(372,844,731) $(1,148,349) $(3,260,969) $(27,743,118) $(400,587,849)

Transit Services

MTS $7,526,779 $14,887,437 $167,568,254 $248,275 $167,816,529 $(7,564,562) $(12,369,418) $(162,903,333) $0 $0 $0 $(162,903,333)

NCTD $3,080,856 $6,093,714 $68,710,946 $122,427 $68,833,373 $(3,000,435) $(4,882,703) $(66,831,367) $(84,010) $(130,168) $(884,575) $(67,715,942)

Senior Grant Program $356,329 $704,793 $7,937,027 $78,809 $8,015,836 $(270,969) $(271,187) $(6,227,052) $0 $0 $0 $(6,227,052)

Total Transit Services $10,963,964 $21,685,944 $244,216,227 $449,511 $244,665,738 $(10,835,966) $(17,523,308) $(235,961,752) $(84,010) $(130,168) $(884,575) $(236,846,327)

New Major Corridor Transit Operations $5,382,310 $10,645,827 $119,887,966 $2,516,874 $122,404,840 $(3,159) $(826,066) $(12,935,744) $0 $0 $0 $(12,935,744)

TOTAL TRANSNET EXTENSTION $68,601,835 $135,691,736 $1,527,462,064 $48,117,156 $1,575,579,220 $(70,687,082) $(99,110,786) $(2,317,041,908) $(18,614,294) $(81,433,169) $(556,958,600) $(2,874,000,508)

Commercial Paper Program Activity

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Commercial Paper Program Availability PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Commercial Paper Disbursements Prior Years Current FY to Date Program to Date FY to Date Program to Date Repayment City of National City $0 $(4,500,000) CP Program $75,000,000 $0 $0 $75,000,000 City of Santee $0 $(3,950,000) NCTD $(30,575,000) $0 $1,225,000 $(29,350,000) NCTD $0 $(34,000,000) City of La Mesa $(1,700,000) $0 $305,000 $(1,395,000) City of La Mesa $0 $(2,500,000) City of Del Mar $(1,200,000) $0 $704,000 $0 City of Del Mar $0 $(704,000) $(29,318,000) $0 $29,318,000 $0 Major Corridor Capital Projects $(1,999,000) $(31,317,000) Major Corridor Capital Projects Major Corridor Project EMP $0 $(10,704,000) Major Corridor Project EMP $(10,704,000) $0 $10,704,000 $0 Total CP Disbursements $(1,999,000) $(87,675,000) CP AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE $1,503,000 $0 $42,256,000 $44,255,000

Other Activity

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Sales Tax Revenue Transfers for EMP Debt Service Payments

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Program to Date

Major Corridor Capital Projects $3,123,188 $(440,366) $(797,446) $2,325,742

Major Corridor Project EMP $(3,123,188) $440,366 $797,446 $(2,325,742)

Total Other Activity $0 $0 $0 $0

7 10/01/14 - 12/31/14 2008 ABCD Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $600,000,000

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements 4,5

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date

San Diego County $16,893,500 $0 $0 $16,893,500

Major Corridor Capital Projects $392,721,119 $0 $0 $392,721,119

Major Corridor Project EMP $45,517,182 $0 $0 $45,517,182

Total 2008 Bond Disbursement $455,131,801 $0 $0 $455,131,801

2010 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $338,960,000 2012 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $420,585,000

PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements5

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date

City of San Marcos $15,253,813 $0 $0 $15,253,813 San Diego County $5,525,913 $0 $0 $5,525,913 Major Corridor Capital Projects City of Solana Beach $5,515,065 $0 $0 $5,515,065 $323,753,377 $0 $2,815 $323,756,192 Major Corridor Project EMP $5,750,169 $0 $0 $5,750,169 Major Corridor Capital Projects $275,632,526 $0 $0 $275,632,526 Total 2012 A Bond Disbursement $335,029,459 $0 $2,815 $335,032,274 Major Corridor Project EMP $43,956,923 $0 $0 $43,956,923

Total 2010 A Bond Disbursement $340,358,327 $0 $0 $340,358,327

2010 B Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $11,040,000 2014 A Sales Tax Revenue Bond Activity - $350,000,000 PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements PROGRAM & RECIPIENT Bond Proceeds Disbursements

Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date Prior Years This Quarter FY to Date Program to Date

City of National City $3,383,956 $0 $0 $3,383,956 City of Del Mar $0 $1,995 $713,935 $713,935 $0 $9,885 $1,190,468 $1,190,468 City of Santee $8,519,844 $0 $0 $8,519,844 City of San Marcos City of Santee $0 $2,993 $14,904 $14,904 Total 2010 B Bond Disbursement $11,903,800 $0 $0 $11,903,800 Major Corridor Capital Projects $0 $30,179,076 $108,026,518 $108,026,518 Major Corridor Project EMP $0 $3,082,511 $16,673,063 $16,673,063 Total 2014 A Bond Disbursement $0 $33,276,460 $126,618,888 $126,618,888

FOOTNOTES: 1. Other income includes interest revenue, transfers from TransNet I, other non-sales tax revenue, and the one-time swap of Major Corridor Sales Tax Revenue (to LSI Cities and County) for ARRA funds. 2. Program Disbursements include payments to TransNet recipient agencies and program costs, including payments made for Early Action Projects in prior years, and return of funds. 3. Debt Service includes principal and interest payments, including debt payments beginning in March 2008 upon issuance of the 2008 ABCD Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, and other debt service costs net of interest earnings. 4. 2008 Bond Proceeds have been fully disbursed, net of Reserve Requirement of $17.1 million. The Program to Date total includes interest earnings. The 2008 Bonds were partially defeased with the issuance of the 2012 Bonds on June 14, 2012, thereby reducing the 2008 Bond Proceed Disbursement. 5. The Commercial Paper Program was reduced from $100 million to $75 million on September 1, 2012.

Data shown in prior reports may have been modified to include additional data received after submission of the report.

8 10/01/14 - 12/31/14 Transit Projects Attachment 2

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

1 1201507/ SR-15 BRT Award Mar-15 $56,255 $56,255 2017 Yes Yes SAN26C Mid-City Centerline Stations Contract

2 1201514/ I-15 Downtown BRT Draft Dec-15 $15,975 $15,975 2019 Yes Yes SAN129 Layover Facility Environmental

3 1280504/ South Bay BRT Design Mar-15 $99,908 $99,908 2016 Behind Yes SAN47 Otay Mesa to Downtown Bus Rapid Transit Guideway

4 1049600/ East County Maintenance Facility Construction Sep-16 $44,957 $44,957 2016 Behind No SAN52 Maintenance and Operation Facility

5 1300601/ San Ysidro Intermodal Facility Construction Jul-15 $40,460 $40,460 2015 Yes Yes SAN27 Freight Facility and Mainline

6 1210030/ Orange/Blue Line Construction Jun-15 $133,928 $133,928 2015 Yes Yes SAN172 Station Rehabilitation

7 1257001/ Mid-Coast Light Rail Transit (LRT) Federal Funding Dec-15 $1,687,723 $1,687,723 2019 Yes Yes SAN23 Old Town to University Towne Centre Agreement

North Coast Corridor 8 1144200/ San Onofre to Pulgas Construction Nov-15 $37,696 $37,696 2015 Yes No SAN115 Double Tracking (Phase 1)

North Coast Corridor 9 1145000/ Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Construction May-17 $25,000 $25,000 2017 Yes No SAN163 4 Bridge Replacements

Project changes from previous report are in bold 9 February 2015 Transit Projects

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's) North Coast Corridor 10 1239803/ Oceanside Station Design Mar-15 $21,800 $21,800 2016 Behind Yes SAN116 Stub Tracks and Crossover

North Coast Corridor 11 1239805/ Poinsettia Station/Carlsbad Design Jun-15 $14,501 $14,501 2017 Yes Yes SAN117 Run-Through Track

North Coast Corridor 12 1239806/ San Elijo Lagoon Design Jul-15 $76,700 $76,700 2018 Yes Yes SAN73 Double Tracking

North Coast Corridor 13 1239807/ Sorrento Valley Construction Sep-15 $30,789 $30,789 2015 Yes Yes SAN119 Double Tracking

North Coast Corridor 14 1239809/ Eastbrook to Shell Design Jun-17 $6,920 $74,600 TBD TBD Yes SAN64 Double Tracking

North Coast Corridor 15 1239810/ Carlsbad Village Draft Feb-17 $5,980 $50,622 TBD TBD Yes SAN130 Double Tracking Environmental

North Coast Corridor 16 1239811/ Elvira to Morena Final Feb-15 $95,000 $95,000 2018 Yes Yes SAN132 Double Tracking Environmental

North Coast Corridor 17 1239812/ Sorrento-Miramar Curve Final Mar-15 $11,000 $98,071 TBD TBD Yes SAN29 Realignment & 2nd Track - Phase II Environmental

North Coast Corridor 18 1239813/ San Dieguito Double Tracking Final Mar-15 $9,470 $178,355 TBD TBD Yes SAN30 Event Platform at Del Mar Fairgrounds Environmental

Project changes from previous report are in bold 10 February 2015 Transit Projects

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's) North Coast Corridor 19 1239815/ San Diego River Bridge Design Jul-15 $82,400 $82,400 2018 Yes Yes SAN182 Rail Improvements

North Coast Corridor 20 1239816/ Batiquitos Lagoon Design Dec-16 $61,400 $61,400 2019 Yes Yes SAN183 Double Track

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for Transit Projects $2,557,862 $2,926,140

Project changes from previous report are in bold 11 February 2015 Attachment 3

TRANSIT PROJECTS 76 8 1. I-15 BRT Mid-City Centerline Stations 2. I-15 Downtown BRT Layover Facility

Camp Pendleton 3. South Bay BRT

4. East County Bus Maintenance Facility 15 5. San Ysidro Intermodal Freight Facility

6. Orange/Blue Line Station Rehabilitation

7. Mid-Coast LRT Old Town – UTC

8. Camp Pendleton/San Onofre Doubt Track 5 76 9. Los Peñasquitos Lagoon Bridge Replacement 10 14 10. Oceanside Station Stub Tracks & Crossover Vista Oceanside 11. Poinsettia Station/Carlsbad Run Through Track 78 San 15 Marcos 12. San Elijo Lagoon Double Track 13. Sorrento Valley Double Track

14. Eastbrook to Shell Double Track Carlsbad Escondido 15. Carlsbad Village Double Track 16. Elvira to Morena Double Track 11 78 17. Sorrento Miramar – Curve Realignment and Double Track – Phase II 78 18. San Dieguito Double Track 20 19. San Diego River Bridge Rail Improvements Encinitas 5 12 20. Batiquitos Lagoon Double Track 67 Project number refers to Solana 18 Project ID in Attachment 2 Beach Poway

Del Mar 56 13 9 17 15 County of San Diego

805 Santee 52 67 52 4 8 5 16 163 125 San 15 7 Diego La Mesa El Cajon Major 19 8

Transit Projects 805 1 October - December 2014 Lemon 94 Grove Project Under Development 125

Project Under Construction 282 Bus Rapid Transit Center 3 (BRTC) Under Development Coronado 2 5 54 Bus Rapid Transit Center National (BRTC) Under Construction City 125 94

75 805 MILES Chula Map Area 6 Vista San Diego Region

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 Beach UNITED STATES 5 MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3081 2/15 12 Active Transportation Projects Attachment 4

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

30 1223016/ Coastal Rail Trail Draft Mar-15 $2,673 $20,636 2017 Yes Yes SAN155 South of SR 52 to Mission Bay Environmental Along Rose Creek

31 1223017/ Coastal Rail Trail Draft Sep-15 $1,289 $6,885 2017 Yes Yes SAN156 Encinitas – G St to Chesterfield Dr. Environmental

32 1223018/ Coastal Rail Trail Draft Sep-15 $102 TBD TBD Yes Yes SAN207 Encinitas - Chesterfield Dr. to Solana Beach Environmental

33 1223023/ Inland Rail Trail Design Jun-15 $34,257 $34,257 2017 Yes Yes SAN153 Phases 1-4 Melrose Drive to N. Pacific Street

34* 1143700/ Bayshore Bikeway - Segment 4 Construction Apr-15 $5,350 $5,350 2015 Yes Yes SAN144 32nd St. and Harbor to Civic Center Dr.

35* 1143700/ Bayshore Bikeway - Segment 5 Design Jun-15 - - 2016 Yes Yes SAN144 Civic Center Dr. to Sweetwater Channel

36 1129900/ Bayshore Bikeway Environmental Jun-15 $3,410 $3,410 2017 Yes Yes SAN154 Segment 8B Main St. to Palomar

37 1223055/ Bayshore Bikeway Draft Jun-16 $2,095 $18,196 TBD Yes Yes SAN195 Barrio Logan Environmental

38 1144500/ Sweetwater Bikeway Construction Dec-15 $1,946 $1,946 2015 Yes Yes SAN161 Plaza Bonita Segment

39 1223020/ Bicycle Facilities Draft Jun-15 $6,083 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN158 La Mesa to North Park Environmental

40 1223022/ Bicycle Facilities Draft Jun-15 $7,593 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN160 Old Town to San Diego Environmental

41 1223014/ SR 15 Commuter Bike Facility Advertise Apr-15 $14,465 $14,465 2017 Yes Yes CAL330 Camino del Rio South to Adams Ave

Project changes from previous report are in bold 13 February 2015 Active Transportation Projects

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's) 42 1223054/ SR 15 Bike Path Draft Aug-15 $283 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN204 Adams Ave to Landis Street Environmental

43 1223052/ San Diego River Trail Final Apr-15 $595 $829 TBD TBD Yes SAN197 Qualcomm Stadium Environmental

44 1223053/ San Diego River Trail Final Jun-15 $1,325 $10,228 TBD TBD Yes SAN198 Carlton Oaks Segment Environmental

45 1223056/ San Ysidro-Imperial Beach Parkway Draft Apr-16 $1,282 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN203 Bike Lanes along W. San Ysidro Blvd to Environmental Imperial Beach Blvd.

46 1223057/ Balboa Park Bikeway Draft May-17 $1,245 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN205 North Park to Downtown Environmental

47 1223058/ Downtown Bikeway Draft Jun-16 $2,745 TBD TBD TBD Yes SAN206 Imperial Ave from 47th St to Park Blvd Environmental

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for Active Transportation Projects $86,738 $116,202

*Project funding shown in Segment 4 is combination of both Segments 4 and 5 as shown in CIP 1143700

Project changes from previous report are in bold 14 February 2015 Attachment 5

76

Camp Pendleton

15

Inland Rail Trail - 5 Melrose Dr. to N. Pacific St. 76

Vista Oceanside 78 San Marcos

Carlsbad Escondido

78

5 78 Encinitas

Coastal 67 Rail Trail Encinitas Solana Beach Poway County of San Diego Del Mar 56

15

Santee San Diego River Trail - Carlton Oaks 5 San Diego River Trail - 805 Qualcomm Stadium 52 67 Coastal Rail Trail 52 Along Rose Creek 8 163 125 San 15 Diego La SR15 Bike Path Mesa El Cajon 8

Old Town to San Diego La Mesa to North Park 5 Lemon 94 Grove Major Active 125 Transportation Projects 282 Bayshore Bikeway - October - December 2014 National Barrio Logan City Coronado 54 Sweetwater Bikeway - Project Under Development Plaza Bonita Segment Project Under Construction Bayshore 125 94 Bikeway - 75 805 MILES Segments 4 & 5 Chula Map Area Vista San Diego Region Imperial KILOMETERS Beach San Diego 5 905 Bayshore Bikeway - UNITED STATES Segment 8B MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3081 2/15 15 Express/HOV Lanes and Direct Access Ramp (DAR) Projects Attachment 6

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

50 1200501/ I-5 North Coast Corridor CAL09 La Jolla Village Drive to Harbor Drive Complete Complete $72,695 $72,695 N/A Yes Yes Environmental Document Only - NEPA

51 1200504/ I-5 North Coast Corridor CAL09 Manchester Avenue to SR 78 Design Sep-15 $482,300 $482,300 2019 Yes Yes 2 HOV Lanes/Noise Barriers

52 1207801/ SR 78 HOV/Managed Lanes Project Jul-15 $1,650 TBD TBD TBD Yes CAL278 SR 78 from I-5 to I-15 Study

53 1207802/ I-15/SR 78 HOV Connectors Project Mar-15 $850 TBD TBD TBD Yes CAL277 Nordahl Road to West Valley Parkway Study

54 1280508/ SR 94 Express Lanes Draft May-15 $22,600 $109,627 TBD TBD Yes CAL67 I-5 to I-805 Environmental 2 HOV Lanes & Connectors at SR 94/I-805

55 1280511/ I-805 HOV Lanes - North Construction Jul-16 $121,500 $121,500 2016 Yes Yes CAL78B SR 52 to Mira Mesa Blvd

56 1280510/ I-805 Managed Lanes - South Construction Aug-15 $182,216 $182,216 2015 Yes Yes CAL78C Palomar Street to SR 94 Direct Access Ramps

57 1280514/ I-805/SR 15 Interchange Design Dec-15 $17,926 $17,926 TBD TBD Yes CAL78C 2 HOV Lanes on I-805 from SR 94 to SR 15

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for HOV/DAR Projects $901,737 $986,264

Project changes from previous report are in bold 16 February 2015 Attachment 7

76

Camp Pendleton

15

5 76

Vista Oceanside 78 San Marcos

I-5 HOV Lanes Escondido and Noise Barriers Carlsbad

78 I-5 HOV/General Purpose Lanes 78

Encinitas 5

67 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56

15

County of San Diego

I-805 HOV / Managed Lanes North 805 Santee 52 67 52 8 5 163 125 San 15 Diego La Mesa El Cajon 8

Major Express/ 805 HOV Lanes and Lemon 94 Grove Direct Access Ramp 125 (DAR) Projects 282 October - December 2014 I-805 HOV / Managed Coronado 5 54 Lanes South Project Under Development National Project Under Construction SR 94 City Express Lanes 125 94 805 75 MILES Chula Map Area Vista San Diego Region

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 Beach UNITED STATES MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3081 2/15 17 Highway Projects Attachment 8

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule

Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Open to On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Traffic Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

North Coast Corridor 60 1200506/ I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange Construction Nov-17 $105,190 $105,190 2017 Yes Yes CAL75 Interchange and South Bound Aux Lane

61 1200505/ I-5/I-8 Interchange Construction Oct-16 $20,900 $20,900 2016 Yes Yes CAL77 West to North Connector Widening

62 1200503/ I-5/ SR 56 Interchange Final Jun-15 $17,872 $17,872 TBD TBD Yes CAL114 West-North and South-East Interchanges Environmental

63 CAL71 I-5/ SR 78 Connectors Draft Aug-18 $5,000 $200,000 TBD Yes No South to East Connector and West to South Environmental

64 1201101/ SR 11 4-Lane Freeway and East Construction Dec-15 $704,000 $704,000 2015 Yes No Otay Mesa Border Crossing V11 SR 905 to Enrico Fermi Freeway Access to New Border Crossing

65* 1207606/ SR 76 East Widening (Phase 2)* Construction Dec-17 $201,549 $201,549 2017 Yes Yes CAL29B South Mission Road to Old Highway 395

66 1212501/ SR 94/ SR 125 Interchange Draft Mar-15 $10,654 $60,862 TBD TBD Yes CAL68 Add North to East and West to South Environmental Connectors Widen SR 125 from SR 94 to Lemon Avenue

67 1390504/ SR 905/125/11 Connectors (Northbound) Advertisement Apr-15 $3,500 $24,380 2017 Yes Yes CAL325 Westbound SR 905-Northbound SR 125 Eastbound SR 905-Northbound SR 125 Westbound SR 11-Northbound SR 125

Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for Highway Projects $1,068,665 $1,334,753

Project changes from previous report are in bold *Budget/Funding amount inclusive of Phases 1 and 2 18 February 2015 Attachment 9

76

Camp Pendleton

15

SR 76 Highway Widening East

5 76

Vista Oceanside 78 San Marcos I-5 / SR 78 Connectors

Escondido Carlsbad

78

78

Encinitas 5

67 Solana Beach Poway

Del Mar 56

I-5/SR 56 New Connectors 15

I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange County of San Diego Widening/Improvements

805 Santee 52 67 52 8 5 163 125 San 15 I-5 / I-8 Diego La Connector Mesa El Cajon Widening 8 SR 94 / SR 125 805 Interchange Connectors

Lemon 94 Grove 125 Major Highway Projects October - December 2014 282

Coronado 5 54 Project Under Development National Project Under Construction City SR 905/SR125/SR11 125 New Connectors 94 805 (Northbound) 75 MILES Chula SR 11 Map Area Vista New Freeway San Diego Region KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 Beach UNITED STATES 2-D MEXICO 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3081 2/15 19 Traffic Demand Management and Intelligent Transportation System Projects Attachment 10

Total Project Project Title Current Status Cost and Budget Schedule Estimated Approved Cost to Est. Implem. On TransNet Project CIP/ Description/Limits Phase Completion Budget Complete Date Schedule? Funded? No. MPO ID Date ($1,000's) ($1,000's)

70* 1142500/ Centralized Train Control - Phase 3 Implemented Implemented $14,933 $14,933 2014 Yes No SAN79 -Blue Line

71* 1142500/ Centralized Train Control - Phase 4 Implementation Jun-15 - - 2015 Yes No SAN79 -Orange Line

72 1144601/ I-15 Integrated Corridor Management Implemented Implemented $9,559 $9,559 2015 Yes Yes SAN94 ICM Initiative 1

73 1144800/ Regional Arterial Detection Plan Implementation Jun-16 $2,280 $2,280 2016 Yes No SAN54 Phase 1 Approved Cost to Budget Complete

Total for ITS Projects $26,772 $26,772

* Project funding inclusive of both phases

Project changes from previous report are in bold *Budget/Funding amount inclusive of both phases 20 February 2015 Attachment 11

Assists by Patrol Beat 76 1 3052

Camp Pendleton 2 1814

15 3 1502

4 1631

5 1955 5 76 6 1650

Vista 7 1807 Oceanside 78 San 1267 Marcos 8

13 9 2020

192 Escondido 10 Carlsbad 11 1008 11 78 12 1764 78 13 671 Encinitas 5 14 188 12 67 Solana 15 597 Beach Poway

Del 10 Mar 9 56

15

County of San Diego

805 Santee 52 67 8 52 6 14 8 5 163 5 125 San 15 Diego La Mesa El Cajon 7 8

® 805 4 Lemon 94 Grove 125

282 3

Freeway Service Coronado 5 1 54 National Patrol Assists City October - December 2014 125 94 805 75 2 MILES Chula Vista Map Area San Diego Region

KILOMETERS San Diego 5 Imperial 905 15 Beach UNITED STATES MEXICO 2-D 2

1-D Tijuana, B.C. 1 3081 2/15 21 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-7 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

REPORT ON MEETINGS AND EVENTS ATTENDED File Number 8000100 ON BEHALF OF SANDAG

Since the last Board of Directors meeting, Board members participated in the following meetings and events on behalf of SANDAG. Key topics of discussion also are summarized.

February 5, 2015: Facilitating Access to Coordinated Transportation Board of Directors Meeting San Diego, CA

As the SANDAG representative and 2015 Chair of the Facilitating Access to Coordinated Transportation (FACT) Board of Directors, Third District County Supervisor Dave Roberts attended the FACT Board of Directors annual retreat held on February 6, 2015, at the San Diego County’s County Operations Center. The FACT Board approved the Metropolitan Transit System vehicle donations and lease of a FACT-owned vehicle and also viewed the RideFACT marketing video. The FACT Board was provided a presentation on current and potential collaborations with 2-1-1 and SANDAG on veteran’s mobility. The FACT Board also heard updates on all contracted services and new service proposals.

February 7-11, 2015: National Association of Regional Councils National Conference of Regions Washington, D.C.

SANDAG Chair Jack Dale, National City Mayor Ron Morrison, and Lemon Grove Mayor Mary Sessom attended the National Association of Regional Councils National Conference of Regions from February 7-11, 2015, as the SANDAG representatives. They participated, along with leaders and board members, professional staff, and local elected officials from Councils of Government and Metropolitan Planning Organizations, in sessions to determine key policy issues and a legislative agenda on topics of relevance and importance to executive directors and local elected officials representing regional organizations and boards.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Key Staff Contact: Robyn Wapner, (619) 699-1994, [email protected]

AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

FY 2016 TO FY 2020 TRANSPORTATION REVENUE ESTIMATES File Number 1500300

Introduction Recommendation

The transit operators within the San Diego region receive The Transportation Committee recommends federal, state, and local revenues to support both ongoing that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the operations and capital projects. SANDAG is responsible for FY 2016 Transportation Development Act the apportionment of these various funds to the transit (TDA) and Federal Transit Administration operators and to the local agencies. Each year, SANDAG (FTA) revenue apportionments, and FY 2016 provides an estimate for the upcoming fiscal year as well as TransNet and State Transit Assistance (STA) a projection for the next four fiscal years to allow the revenue allocations; and (2) approve the transit and local agencies to plan for capital projects and revenue estimates for FY 2017 to FY 2020 for determine operating subsidies. TDA, STA, TransNet, and FTA.

Discussion

Summary of FY 2016 to FY 2020 Revenue Estimates

The allocation of these funds is determined both by law and at the discretion of the SANDAG Board of Directors. This report provides the FY 2016 revenue estimates for the Transportation Development Act (TDA), TransNet, State Transit Assistance (STA), and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula programs, along with the forecast methodology used to project the estimates for the next four fiscal years. The estimates for each revenue source are summarized below. Information regarding how future-year estimates were derived is detailed in Attachment 6 (Forecast Methodology) and additional information regarding the fund type is detailed in Attachment 7 (Funding Programs).

1. Transportation Development Act: The San Diego County Auditor and Controller office is required by state law to provide the estimated apportionment for the upcoming fiscal year before February 1 of each year. The apportionment is developed in consultation with SANDAG and is based on actual sales tax receipts as well as receipt projections. The FY 2016 apportionment of $137,993,413 is based on a 5 percent increase over the estimated FY 2015 TDA receipt. The FY 2016 apportionment and the FY 2017 to FY 2020 estimates are shown in Attachment 1.

2. State Transit Assistance: The State Controller’s office is responsible for providing estimates in January of each year. Based on the FY 2016 preliminary estimate, $24,658,460 is available to the San Diego region. The funding for this program is sales tax generated from diesel fuel. Due to extreme funding fluctuations in the past, SANDAG ceased providing a forecast in FY 2009 given the lack of a good basis to estimate future projections. The introduction of various legislative measures since then has helped to stabilize this funding source. As such, SANDAG is prepared to provide STA forecasts again. The FY 2016 allocation provides a 4 percent increase from FY 2015. Attachment 2 shows the allocation for FY 2016 and FY 2017 to FY 2020 estimates, keeping the revenues flat.

Current statute requires transit agencies to meet certain criteria related to operating efficiencies in order to use STA funds for operations. ABX8-9 (Budget, 2010) and subsequently, Senate Bill 565 (Chapter 341) (DeSaulnier, 2011), suspended these qualifying criteria through FY 2014-2015. Legislation to continue this suspension is expected to be introduced this year. The SANDAG area, as defined under the STA Program, consists of the area outside of the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) area of jurisdiction. The North County Transit District (NCTD) is the only claimant of STA funds in the SANDAG area. Of the $24,658,460 allocated to the San Diego region, $5,984,454 is available for NCTD to claim. The remaining $18,674,006 is available to MTS.

3. TransNet: Estimates are developed by SANDAG based on actual sales tax receipts through the first two quarters of FY 2015. For FY 2016, approximately $286.8 million is estimated to be available for the entire program (a 5% increase over projected FY 2015), of which approximately $45.9 million is available for transit purposes. The estimate for FY 2016 to FY 2020 revenues for the entire program is shown in Attachment 3. The TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) reviewed the estimates at its meeting on February 11, 2015, and had no significant comments related to the estimates. At this meeting, the ITOC also voted to recommend that the Board of Directors forgo the FY 2016 TransNet ITOC allocation as there is a sufficient balance remaining to carry over into the next fiscal year. The forfeited ITOC share has been distributed to the remaining programs, as shown in Attachment 3. Final approval of this action will be considered as part of the FY 2016 SANDAG Budget by the Board of Directors in May 2015. For the Transit System Improvements Program, the FY 2016 through FY 2020 estimates are included in Attachment 4.

4. Federal Transit Administration Formula Programs: The current federal transportation authorization bill, known as the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, expires on May 31, 2015. Reauthorization language, including funding levels to provide for a full year’s apportionment, has not yet been made available by Congress, so the estimate for FTA formula programs remains the same as in FY 2015 and continues to FY 2020 in order to remain conservative. Attachment 5 provides the FY 2016 Apportionment and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Revenue Estimates.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Transportation Development Act – FY 2016 Apportionment and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Estimates 2. State Transit Assistance – FY 2016 Allocation and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Estimates 3. TransNet Program Revenue Estimates – FY 2016 to FY 2020 4. TransNet Revenue Forecast - Transit System Improvements Program – Revenues Estimates FY 2016 to FY 2020 5. Federal Transit Administration Formula Programs – FY 2016 Apportionment and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Revenue Estimates 6. Forecast Methodology 7. Funding Programs

Key Staff Contact: Sookyung Kim, (619) 699-6909, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1 Transportation Development Act FY 2016 Apportionment and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Estimates

FY 2017 Estimate FY 2018 Estimate FY 2019 Estimate FY 2020 Estimate ($000s) ($000s) ($000s) ($000s) FY 2016 Mid-Range Low Mid-Range Low Mid-Range Low Mid-Range Low Total Apportionment1,2 $137,993,413 $144,755 $138,314 $152,138 $145,697 $159,744 $153,304 $167,572 $161,131 Less County Auditor Expenses (PUC 99233.1) (50,000) (51) (51) (52) (52) (53) (53) (54) (54) Less SANDAG Administration (PUC 99233.1)* (634,307) (497) (474) (522) (499) (731) (707) (575) (550) Less 3% Planning Funds (PUC 99233.2) (4,119,273) (4,326) (4,134) (4,547) (4,354) (4,769) (4,576) (5,008) (4,816) Less 2% Bicycle/Pedestrian Funds (PUC 99233.3) (2,663,797) (2,798) (2,673) (2,940) (2,816) (3,084) (2,959) (3,239) (3,114)

Less 5%Community Transit Service (PUC 99233.7) (6,528,802) (6,857) (6,552) (7,206) (6,901) (7,558) (7,253) (7,938) (7,633) Subtotal $123,997,234 $130,226 $124,430 $136,871 $131,075 $143,549 $137,756 $150,758 $144,964 Total Available for MTS 88,098,049 92,524 88,406 97,244 93,126 101,990 97,873 107,112 102,995 Less Regional Planning/Capital Projects 3 0 (1,794) (194) (194) (194) (194) (194) (194) (194) Less Transferred Functions4 (1,774,130) (1,863) (1,780) (1,958) (1,875) (2,054) (1,971) (2,157) (2,074) Total Community Transit Service 4,545,837 4,774 4,562 5,018 4,805 5,262 5,050 5,527 5,314 Total Available to Claim $90,869,756 $93,641 $90,994 $100,109 $95,862 $105,004 $100,758 $110,287 $106,042 Total Available for NCTD 35,899,185 37,703 36,025 39,626 37,948 41,560 39,882 43,647 41,970 Less Regional Planning/Capital Projects 3 (600,115) (741) (741) (589) (589) (1,206) (1,206) (829) (829) Less Transferred Functions4 (601,311) (632) (603) (664) (636) (696) (668) (731) (703) Total Community Transit Service 1,852,389 1,945 1,859 2,045 1,958 2,144 2,058 2,252 2,166 Total Available to Claim $36,550,148 $38,276 $36,540 $40,418 $38,682 $41,802 $40,066 $44,339 $42,604 Total Available for SANDAG: Regional Planning/Capital Projects 600,115 934 934 783 783 1,400 1,400 1,022 1,022 Transferred Functions 2,375,441 2,495 2,384 2,622 2,511 2,750 2,639 2,888 2,777 SANDAG Expenses 634,307 497 474 522 499 731 707 575 550 3% Planning Funds 4,119,273 4,326 4,134 4,547 4,354 4,769 4,576 5,008 4,816 Prior Year Carryover 3,468,517 Total Available to Claim $11,197,653 $8,252 $7,926 $8,474 $8,147 $9,650 $9,322 $9,493 $9,165 Total Community Transit Service (CTSA) $130,576 $137 $131 $144 $138 $151 $145 $159 $153 Prior Year Carryover $0 Total Available to Claim $130,576 $137 $131 $144 $138 $151 $145 $159 $153 *Totals may not add up due to rounding

1The County Auditor provided the apportionment for FY 2016. The projected estimates for FY 2017 to FY 2020 are based on the growth rate in retail sales as forecasted by SANDAG and excludes interest and prior year excess funds. The low range is based on the 95% confidence interval of -$6.4M per year.

2Apportionment distribution is based on the population estimates published by the California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates as of January 2014 - approximately 71% for MTS and 29% for NCTD.

3Represents the local match for federally funded regional planning and transit capital development projects identified in the FY 2016 transit CIP as provided by MTS and NCTD. The projects funded are scheduled to be included as part of the FY 2016 Capital Improvement Program scheduled for Transportation Committee/Board action at their March meetings. As a result, this amount is subject to change.

4Based on Addendums No. 3 and No. 4 to the Master Memorandum of Understanding between MTS, NCTD, and SANDAG. For NCTD, 26.09% of this share is transferred back to NCTD to be used for TDA-eligible purposes.

*Note: The SANDAG Administration cost rises in FY 2016 and in FY 2019 disproportionately due to costs associated with the triennial performance audit. All other annual increases in SANDAG administrative share are consistent with the estimated growth in the TDA. 3 Attachment 2

State Transit Assistance (STA) FY 2016 Allocation and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Estimates (in $000s)

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Regional Discretionary Funds (PUC 99313)

SANDAG (North County Transit District) $4,016 $4,016 $4,016 $4,016 $4,016

Metropolitan Transit System $12,139 $12,139 $12,139 $12,139 $12,139

Subtotal Discretionary $16,155 $16,155 $16,155 $16,155 $16,155

Operator Formula Funds (PUC 99314)

SANDAG (North County Transit District) $1,968 $1,968 $1,968 $1,968 $1,968

Metropolitan Transit System $6,535 $6,535 $6,535 $6,535 $6,535

Subtotal Formula $8,503 $8,503 $8,503 $8,503 $8,503

Regional Total $24,658 $24,658 $24,658 $24,658 $24,658

Statewide Total $387,798 $387,798 $387,798 $387,798 $387,798

4 Attachment 3 TransNet Program Revenue Estimates FY 2016 to FY 2020 (in $000s)

TransNet Program Revenues FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Estimated Sales Tax Receipts $286,773 $300,825 $316,167 $331,976 $348,243

TransNet Program Allocations

Administrative Allocations1 $2,868 $3,008 $3,162 $3,320 $3,482

Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee2 $0 $401 $412 $422 $433 Bike, Pedestrian & Neighborhood Safety3 $5,735 $6,017 $6,323 $6,640 $6,965

Total off-the-top Programs $8,603 $9,426 $9,897 $10,382 $10,880

Net Available for Subprograms* $278,170 $291,399 $306,270 $321,594 $337,362

Program Allocations

Major Corridors Program4 $117,944 $123,553 $129,859 $136,356 $143,042

New BRT/Rail Operations5 $22,532 $23,603 $24,808 $26,049 $27,326 Transit System Improvements6 $45,898 $48,081 $50,535 $53,063 $55,665

Local System Improvement7 $91,796 $96,162 $101,069 $106,126 $111,330 Total Program Allocations* $278,170 $291,399 $306,270 $321,594 $337,362

*Totals may not add up due to rounding

NOTES:

The TransNet Ordinance established the rules for the allocation of all Commission revenues. Commission funds are allocated according to the following priorities: 1Up to 1% of the annual revenues shall be allocated for administrative expenses, which includes Commission/Board expenses, administrative reserve. 2The ITOC allocation is based on the annual increase in CPI beginning with FY 2002, using $250,000 as the starting base. 3Total of 2% shall be allocated for bicycle facilities. 442.4% of the total revenues less off the top programs shall be allocated for Major Corridor projects which include transportation mitigation under the Environmental Mitigation program (EMP) and any finance charges incurred. 5 8.1% of the total revenues less off the top programs shall be allocated to operate new rail or bus rapid transit (BRT) services. 616.5% of the total revenues less off the top programs shall be allocated for purposes of public transit services including providing for senior and American with Disabilities Act (ADA)-related services. 733% of total revenues less off the top programs shall be allocated for local street improvement services, which includes roadway projects, as well as local EMP and smart growth incentive programs. 5 Attachment 4 TransNet Revenue Forecast - Transit System Improvements Program* Revenues Estimate FY 2016 to FY 2020 (in $000s)

FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2017 FY 2017 FY 2017 Proposed (Estimate) (Estimate) (Estimate) (Estimate)

Mid-Range Mid-Range Low Mid-Range Low Mid-Range Low Mid-Range Low

Total Available For Transit Purposes1: $45,898 $48,081 $46,019 $50,535 $48,473 $53,063 $51,001 $55,665 $53,603

Less 2.5% for ADA-related Services ($1,147) ($1,202) ($1,150) ($1,263) ($1,212) ($1,327) ($1,275) ($1,392) ($1,340)

Less 3.25% for Senior Services ($1,492) ($1,563) ($1,496) ($1,642) ($1,575) ($1,725) ($1,658) ($1,809) ($1,742)

Subtotal $43,259 $45,316 $43,373 $47,629 $45,686 $50,012 $48,069 $52,464 $50,521

MTS Projects And Services: Transit Service Improvements (Operations and Supporting Capital) $30,735 $32,196 $30,816 $33,840 $32,459 $35,533 $34,152 $37,275 $35,894

ADA Services $815 $854 $817 $898 $861 $943 $906 $989 $952

NCTD Projects And Services: Transit Service Improvements (Operations and Supporting Capital) $12,524 $13,120 $12,557 $13,789 $13,227 $14,479 $13,917 $15,189 $14,627

ADA Services $332 $348 $333 $365 $351 $384 $369 $403 $388

Regional Discretionary Programs2: Competitive Grant Program for Senior Transportation Services $1,492 $1,563 $1,496 $1,642 $1,575 $1,725 $1,658 $1,809 $1,742

*Totals may not add up due to rounding

1The Transit System Services Improvements share is 16.5% of net available revenues. After deducting for ADA and Senior Services, the balance is available for operations and miscellaneous capital projects by the transit agencies. 2The funds are allocated via a Call for Projects process by SANDAG. Other Notes: A. The estimated revenues are based on growth rate in taxable sales as forecasted by SANDAG and excludes interest and prior year excess funds. The low range is based on a 95% confidence interval of (-)$12.9 million for the overall program and (-)$2 million for the Transit System program B. Distribution of revenue estimates are based on the 2004 Proposition A Extension: San Diego Transportation Improvement Program and Expenditure Plan. 6 Attachment 5

Federal Transit Administration Formula Programs FY 2016 Apportionment and FY 2017 to FY 2020 Revenue Estimates

FY 2015 FY 20162 FY 2017 ($000s) FY 2018 ($000s) FY 2019 ($000s) FY 2020 ($000s) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Apportion- Capital Regional Apportion- Capital Regional Apportion- Capital Regional Apportion- Capital Regional Apportion- Capital Regional Carryover1 ment Projects3 Planning ment Projects3 Planning ment Projects3 Planning ment Projects3 Planning ment Projects3 Planning

Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Funds

MTS $2,888,268 $42,483,214 $0 ($811,391) $42,483 $0 ($775) $42,483 $0 ($775) $42,483 $0 ($775) $42,483 $0 ($775)

NCTD $990,971 $18,207,092 ($2,400,459) N/A $18,207 ($2,962) N/A $18,207 ($2,355) N/A $18,207 ($4,823) N/A $18,207 ($2,623) N/A

SANDAG (Vanpool Program)3 ($15,768) $4,000,000 N/A $811,391 $4,000 N/A $775 $4,000 N/A $775 $4,000 N/A $775 $4,000 N/A $775

SANDAG (Capital Projects)4 $2,400,459 $2,962 $2,355 $4,823 $2,623

Total $3,863,471 $64,690,306 $0 $0 $64,690 $0 $0 $64,690 $0 $0 $64,690 $0 $0 $64,690 $0 $0

Section 5337 State of Good Repair/High Intensity

MTS $342,000 $21,681,666 $0 N/A $21,682 $0 N/A $21,682 $0 N/A $21,682 $0 N/A $21,682 $0 N/A

NCTD $160,517 $9,183,450 $0 N/A $9,183 $0 N/A $9,183 $0 N/A $9,183 $0 N/A $9,183 $0 N/A

Total $502,517 $30,865,116 $0 N/A $30,865 $0 N/A $30,865 $0 N/A $30,865 $0 N/A $30,865 $0 N/A

Section 5339 Bus/Bus Facilities5

MTS $240,792 $3,762,917 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A

NCTD $103,197 $1,612,679 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A

Total $343,989 $5,375,596 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A $0 $0 N/A

1Carryover consists of (1) additional apportionment made available by FTA; and (2) any excess prior year apportionments (when one or more of the 3 agencies did not fully obligate the funds available. 2The Federal Register which provides the FTA apportionment is not yet available, this total represents same apportionment as last year. It should be noted that MAP-21 expires in May 2015 five month before the end of the federal fiscal year. As with prior estimates, future years' apportionments remain unchanged until a new multi-year federal transportation legislation is approved. 3SANDAG and transit agencies have agreed to fully fund the rideshare portion of the regional Transportation Demand Management program in recognition of the vanpool program's contribution to the funding level apportioned to the region. Prior year is reconciled with next year's estimate based on consultation with the transit agencies.

4Regional Capital Projects refer to projects and associated funding transferred to SANDAG to implement on behalf of MTS and NCTD based on the draft FY 2016 MTS/NCTD Capital budget. The specific projects and funding recommendation is scheduled to be presented to the Transportation Committee/Board of Directors as part of the FY 2016 Transit Capital Improvement Program at their respective meetings in March, and therefore is subject to change.

5Section 5339 is a new program and with MAP-21 expiring in FY 2015, future years are shown as zero until there is notification of continuation of this program. Also, FTA has determined that transit agencies cannot directly apply for these programs. SANDAG and the transit agencies agreed to exchange the Section 5339 for TransNet-MC. This table is for illustrative purposes to show the amount of the exchange, the actual application of the program will be done by SANDAG.

Note: SANDAG share is based on the estimated costs to operate the regional vanpool program and its estimated increase in future years. The balance of 5307 funds are allocated 70% to MTS and 30% to NCTD. The same 70/30 split applies to the 5337 and 5339 funds (SANDAG does not share in these programs).

7 Attachment 6

Forecast Methodology

SANDAG staff uses a combination of a short- and long-term forecasting methodology to estimate sales tax based on TransNet revenues. The short-term forecasts used by SANDAG focus on sales tax receipts for the succeeding three years and are updated quarterly based on a combination of regional economic information and data from the State Board of Equalization (BOE). The SANDAG short-term quarterly sales tax revenue forecasting model replicates the BOE’s “advance payment” procedure. The BOE employs an advance payment procedure because not all of the sales tax receipts have been processed at the time BOE sends out sales tax revenue to recipients. To make up the difference between the advance payment and actual sales tax receipts, BOE uses a true up each quarter based on the previous quarter’s differences. A key element in determining the advance payment amount per quarter is a sales tax revenue growth rate factor applied to the same quarter from the previous year. The growth rate factor is provided by the California State Department of Finance (DOF). SANDAG pays close attention to this growth rate factor and at times has elected not to use it. The growth rate factor from DOF is influenced by the budget setting process, which does not necessarily represent economic trends and expectations. So, while the SANDAG short-term forecasting methodology utilizes some of the same inputs and variables as BOE such as average historical sales tax revenue receipts, it also includes short-term market variables such as monthly employment growth as well as changes in financial variables such as interest rates to ensure more accurate forecasting process and outcome.

The short-term model produces adequate results, the confidence intervals are (+) or (–) 5 percent using the root mean square deviation method of measuring accuracy. Staff’s forecast procedure provides a midpoint estimate with a range of accuracy of approximately (+) or (–) 5 percent per year at the 95 percent level of confidence for TransNet. For example, for FY 2016 the TransNet revenue estimate for the entire program is projected to be approximately $286 million, making the range between $273.9 million at the low end and $299.7 million at the high end, with 95 percent confidence that the actual revenue amount will be within this range. Staff suggests continuing the established practice of using the midpoint of the confidence interval range for the future year projections. The high and low ranges are determined by beginning with the prior year midpoint, applying the estimated growth rate for the current year, and then adding and subtracting the confidence interval range ($12.9 million for TransNet and $6.4 million for Transportation Development Act [TDA]) from the midpoint. The $6.4 million for the TDA confidence interval range is based on the fact that the TDA receipts are approximately half of the TransNet receipts.

About every three years, SANDAG also undertakes a longer-term forecasting model, which incorporates the short-term forecast described above, but seeks to take a broader view of the economy to predict larger trends, which ultimately could affect sales tax receipts. Unlike the short- term model, which incorporates variables that are more easily forecasted in the near-term, the SANDAG long-term model uses broader data and trends. The long-term model, Demographic and Economic Forecasting Model, is a simultaneous, nonlinear econometric model designed to forecast population and economic variables for the San Diego region from a set of basic assumptions. In general, the model is a synthesis of two widely used techniques. On the demographic side, the cohort-survival method is used. This method considers such factors as birth rates, death rates, and the age, sex, and ethnic distribution of the resident population to arrive at forecasts of demographic variables. On the economic side, time-series/regression methods are used to estimate economic relationships. The resulting econometric equations provide forecasts of employment, income, and other economic variables based on assumptions about national, state, and local growth

8 patterns and local inter-industry relationships. The current model’s forecasts include data for more than 700 economic and demographic variables for the period 2012-2050. To measure accuracy, SANDAG compares the population forecast to census information as it becomes available. The first SANDAG forecasts were in 1972 and most recent projections are Series 13, the results forecasted by the model have proven adequate and in the range of less than 1 percent to 4 percent different from the actual census count.

Expected Trends

The United States economy recorded a very volatile year during 2014. The growth rate for the nation’s total value of goods and services, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) produced during the year, got off to a rocky start and declined 2.1 percent. The second and third quarters picked up dramatically, rising 4.5 percent and 5 percent respectively before slowing to 2.6 percent during the fourth quarter of 2014. After all the volatility, the nation’s GDP increased 2.4 percent, which was in line with the slow annual growth rates recorded since the end of the Great Recession. The consensus outlook for 2015 is for GDP growth to exceed 3 percent.

To achieve a GDP growth rate of 3 percent or higher likely requires more jobs in total and more jobs of a higher quality than has been produced over this past year. Job growth during the past year was the highest it has been since 1999. Nationwide, payroll job growth averaged 246,000 jobs per month compared with 196,000 per month the year before, a 25 percent increase. Nearly 3 million jobs were created nationwide during 2014, a growth rate of about 2 percent. The increase in the rate of job production pushed the unemployment rate down to 5.6 percent in December 2014, nearly the same level as before the start of the Great Recession. Locally, the increase in jobs has outpaced the improved national rate. The San Diego region recorded 44,500 new payroll jobs through December 2014 on a year over year basis, a rise of 3.3 percent, more than a full percentage point above the national rate of increase. In addition, the local unemployment rate dropped more than the nation’s over the same time period, falling to 5.2 percent, and now is below the national rate for only the second time over the past seven years.

The much improved trend for job growth is somewhat dampened by lingering concerns about the economic recovery and economic growth globally. Additional concerns about the recovery include weakness in wage rate growth and the average number of hours worked. These trends, combined with the types of jobs (part-time, temporary with low pay) that have been created since the end of the recession have contributed to keeping real per capita disposable income stagnant for the past three years. This, in turn, has led to weak growth in consumer spending, which makes up more than 70 percent of the economy and is a primary driver of sales tax revenue. Even the recent decline in gas and energy prices is expected to shift consumer expenditures to different categories after a lag rather than push overall spending up in the near term. Additional economic headwinds are expected from the slowing of economic growth globally and in turn the effect on the trade value of the dollar. Most of the United States’ major trading partners are experiencing slower economic growth, including China, Japan, Europe, Mexico, Brazil, and Russia. In turn, the trade value of the dollar is rising, making U.S. goods in these markets more expensive; reducing U.S. exports. In light of these economic headwinds, staff is forecasting an increase in sales tax revenue consistent with the rate of increase experienced during 2014, about 5 percent.

9 The table below shows actual and projected annual rates of change for TransNet revenues. By the end of FY 2014, TransNet revenue was above the past peak recorded during FY 2008, consistent with our expectations.

Growth in TransNet Sales Tax Receipts

SFiscal Year % Change Amount 2010 (Actual) -8.0% $204.2M 2011 (Actual) 8.4% $221.3M 2012 (Actual) 7.0% $236.9M 2013 (Actual) 4.3% $247.2M 2014 (Actual) 5.2% $260.1M* 2015 (Projected) 5.0% $273.1M* 2016 (Estimate) 5.0% $286.8M* 2017 (Estimate) 4.9% $300.8M* 2018 (Estimate) 5.1% $316.2M* 2019 (Estimate) 5.0% $332.0M* 2020 (Estimate) 4.9% $348.2M* *Represents the midpoint of confidence interval range

10 Attachment 7

Funding Programs

Transportation Development Act (TDA): TDA is the major subsidy source that supports the region’s public transit operators and nonmotorized transportation projects. TDA comes from a quarter of a percent of state sales tax assessed in the region. SANDAG, as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency, is responsible for releasing the apportionment of TDA funds each year in conformance with state statute. The transit operators and other member agencies submit their annual TDA claims based on the annual apportionment and in compliance with SANDAG Board Policy No. 027: Transportation Development Act administration policy.

Pursuant to state statute, the County of San Diego Auditor and Controller office has the responsibility for providing the TDA apportionment for the upcoming fiscal year. The County Auditor develops the apportionment in consultation with SANDAG staff and with the transit operators based on actual sales tax receipts and projections. The annual apportionment determines the amount of funds available to each agency to claim. SANDAG is required to notify prospective claimants of the apportionment by March 1, necessitating action by the Board of Directors in February of each year.

The legislative priorities established by state law include certain categories for which TDA funds are taken “off the top.” These include the allocation to SANDAG for various planning, programming, and administrative-related expenses; funding of bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and support of community transit services. In addition, the County Auditor receives an allocation based on estimates of its costs to administer the TDA Program. The remaining apportionment, along with any prior year carryover funds, is available to be claimed by North County Transit District (NCTD) and Metropolitan Transit System (MTS). The balance of current year funds are allocated based upon the population of the service area served by the two transit agencies.

Pursuant to provisions of Senate Bill 1703 (Peace, 2002) and as agreed to by MTS, NCTD, and SANDAG, regional transit capital projects are implemented by SANDAG with funding transferred from both MTS and NCTD. The amount of transfer of local match funds for federal formula funds for the capital projects to be implemented by SANDAG on behalf of MTS is based on the draft five- year transit Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The final list of projects and associated funding is included with the transit CIP scheduled for action by the Transportation Committee and Board of Directors in March of each year. An additional apportionment to SANDAG covers those indirect administrative functions not directly funded by projects. The calculation for the cost of these administrative functions was memorialized in Addenda Nos. 3 and 4 to the Memorandum of Understanding between SANDAG, MTS, and NCTD.

State Transit Assistance (STA): Since its creation in 1971, the STA Program has been an ongoing source of state funding for capital and operating support for public transit agencies. Though the FY 2009-2010 State Budget eliminated the STA Program, it was reinstated as part of the “Gas Tax Swap” agreement (ABx8-6, March 2010), which reconfigured the funding streams that flow into the program. STA is now fully funded by the sales tax on diesel, and can be used for operating and capital purposes.

TransNet: The TransNet Extension, a 40-year, half-cent local sales tax transportation funding measure approved by the San Diego voters in 2004, became effective in FY 2009. TransNet provides funding for major transportation projects in the region. After deducting costs associated with

11 administrative expenses, the operation of the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC), and the Bicycle, Pedestrian, Neighborhood Safety Program, the TransNet Program is divided into Major Corridor (42.4%), New Bus Rapid Transit/Rail Operations (8.1%), Local System Improvements (33%), and Transit System Improvements (16.5%).

Within the Transit System Improvements, services provided pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and subsidies for seniors have specific earmarks (2.5% and 3.25%, respectively). The remaining revenues can be used by the transit agencies for operating or miscellaneous capital purposes. Similar to TDA, the transit share between NCTD and MTS is allocated based upon the respective population of the two transit agencies’ service areas.

ITOC reviews the TransNet estimates for the entire program at its February meeting each year. Any significant comments are presented to the Transportation Committee and the Board of Directors.

Federal Transit Administration Formula Programs

Section 5307: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 49 USC Section 5307 provides for transit capital and operating assistance in urbanized areas and for transportation-related planning. For areas with populations of 200,000 and more, such as San Diego County, the formula is based on a combination of bus/vanpool revenue vehicle miles, bus/vanpool passenger miles, fixed-guideway revenue vehicle miles, and fixed-guideway route miles as well as population and population density. Eligible activities under this program include planning, engineering design, and an evaluation of transit projects and other technical transportation-related studies; capital investments in bus and bus- related activities; construction of maintenance and passenger facilities; and capital investments in new and existing fixed guideway systems, including rolling stock, overhaul and rebuilding of vehicles, track, signals, communications, and computer hardware and software. Preventive maintenance and some ADA complementary paratransit service, while recorded as operating expenditures, are considered capital costs for purposes of eligibility.

Section 5337: This new formula-based State of Good Repair Program replaces and enhances the former 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program. Section 5337 is dedicated to repairing and upgrading the nation’s rail transit systems along with high-intensity motor bus systems that use High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes, including Bus Rapid Transit. This program reflects a commitment to ensuring that public transit operates safely, efficiently, reliably, and sustainably so that communities can offer balanced transportation choices that help to improve mobility, reduce congestion, and encourage economic development. Eligible activities include projects to replace and rehabilitate: rolling stock, track, line equipment and structures, signals and communications, power equipment and substations, passenger stations and terminals, maintenance facilities and equipment, operational support equipment (including computer hardware and software), and Transit Asset Management Plan development and implementation.

Section 5339: This new formula-based Bus and Bus Facilities Program provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. This program replaces the Bus and Bus Facilities Discretionary Program. The FTA has determined that the transit agencies (NCTD and MTS) are not eligible recipients of this program. In order to keep the two transit agencies whole, SANDAG would exchange a like amount of TransNet- Major Corridors (MC) funds with Section 5339 to be used toward TransNet-MC eligible SANDAG projects. SANDAG plans to evaluate this exchange with the new reauthorization.

12 As stated above, the Section 5307 Program is based on a number of factors, including data from the Regional Vanpool Program. Over the years, the Regional Vanpool Program has contributed substantially to the overall funding that comes to the region. In recognition of its contribution, the transit agencies have agreed to update the funding level to fully fund the Regional Vanpool Program from the total apportionment. After deducting for the cost of the Regional Vanpool Program, Section 5307 funds are allocated 70 percent for MTS and 30 percent for NCTD. The same 70/30 formula was used to allocate Sections 5337 and 5339 funding between MTS and NCTD. SANDAG does not directly receive funds from Section 5337 or Section 5339.

13 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT File Number 1500100 PROGRAM: PROPOSED FEE ADJUSTMENT

Introduction Recommendation

The TransNet Extension Ordinance requires the 18 The Board of Directors is asked to approve cities and the County of San Diego to collect an a 2.5 percent adjustment to the Regional exaction from the private sector for each new Transportation Congestion Improvement housing unit constructed in that jurisdiction (units Program, raising the minimum fee from constructed for extremely low, very-low, low, and $2,254 to $2,310, beginning July 1, 2015. moderate income households may be exempted) for contribution to the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP). RTCIP revenue is required to be used to construct improvements on the Regional Arterial System, such as new or widened arterials, traffic signal coordination and other traffic improvements, freeway interchange and related freeway improvements, railroad grade separations, and improvements required for express bus and rail transit. The TransNet Extension Ordinance further requires SANDAG to adjust the RTCIP fee amount each year. The purpose of this annual adjustment is to ensure the RTCIP retains its purchasing power to improve the Regional Arterial System.

The most recent annual adjustment raised the minimum RTCIP exaction by 2 percent, from $2,209 to $2,254 beginning July 1, 2014. Staff evaluated construction cost trends and relevant indices, and based on the analysis discussed below, a 2.5 percent fee adjustment is recommended to the Board of Directors for approval at its February 27, 2015, meeting. This would raise the minimum RTCIP exaction from $2,254 to $2,310 beginning July 1, 2015.

Discussion

Background

The purpose of the RTCIP is to help ensure future development contributes its proportional share of the funding needed to pay for the Regional Arterial System and related regional transportation facility improvements, as defined in the most recent Regional Transportation Plan adopted by SANDAG. The RTCIP funding programs fall under the responsibility of the 19 local jurisdictions, which have established these programs under the state’s Mitigation Fee Act. The jurisdictions must maintain their RTCIP funding programs and comply with specific administrative requirements in order to remain eligible for TransNet local streets and road funding. Section 9 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance requires the RTCIP exaction to be adjusted annually in an amount not to exceed the percentage increase set forth in the Engineering Construction Cost Index (CCI) published by the Engineering News Record (ENR), or a similar CCI. However, the Ordinance also states that in no event shall the adjustment be less than 2 percent per year.

Analysis of Construction Cost Indices

The TransNet Extension Ordinance allows for flexibility in choosing an appropriate CCI, one that most closely reflects price trends experienced by the TransNet construction program over the past year. SANDAG staff evaluated changes recorded in the ENR CCI and the Caltrans statewide CCI. Each index collects a different set of cost factors to determine construction cost trends.

The ENR CCI represents an average from 20 cities across the nation and is based on monthly price changes in four areas: lumber, cement, structural steel, and labor. From December 2013 to December 2014 the national ENR CCI rose 2.8 percent. Although San Diego is not tracked in the national index, Los Angeles is one of the 20 cities that are tracked. Los Angeles, because of its proximity, may reflect construction cost trends more similar to those in San Diego the Los Angeles CCI increased by 2.5 percent (January 2014 to January 2015; December 2014 not available). Both the CCI for the nation and for Los Angeles show moderate cost increases year-over-year, similar to trends TransNet has experienced in its construction bids during the past year. In addition, both indices indicate some softening of cost pressures (rates of increase are slowing). These moderate increases in the CCI reflect broader trends in the economy, which has experienced soft to declining commodity prices such as gas, diesel fuel, copper, and cement, as well as very moderate wage increases.

The Caltrans CCI is based on quarterly price changes gathered from transportation project bids from throughout the state for earthwork, aggregate, concrete, asphalt, and steel. The Caltrans CCI rose 25.3 percent over the past year (third quarter 2013 to third quarter 2014, which is the latest available). Over the past quarter (second quarter 2014 to third quarter 2014) however, the index trend has become more stable, rising 2.7 percent. Although year-over-year the Caltrans CCI has exhibited a highly volatile trend, the more recent data suggest that the broader economic trends mentioned above are beginning to settle down these cost trends.

Based on staff’s evaluation, the Caltrans CCI has experienced significant fluctuations based on large swings in the price bids for excavation and pavement, which likely will moderate during the coming year. The moderate increases exhibited by both the national ENR and Los Angeles CCI reflect the slow turnaround in the broader construction industry. According to the ENR analysis of these construction cost trends, there may be some price rise spillover occurring from the rebounding housing market (primarily multi-family) for materials and labor that is relied on by various areas of construction. The general consensus is for construction cost increases to moderate during 2015. In light of this evaluation of construction cost trends during 2014, staff is recommending that the ENR CCI for Los Angeles through January 2015 be used to set the increase for the RTCIP fee. As indicated above, the ENR CCI for Los Angeles increased by 2.5 percent between January 2014 and January 2015. A 2.5 percent increase would raise the RTCIP fee to $2,310 starting July 1, 2015.

2 Next Steps

In accordance with TransNet Extension Ordinance provisions, each jurisdiction’s RTCIP Funding Program must be submitted for review by the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) by April 1 of each year in order to remain eligible for TransNet local streets and road funding. The annual submittal of RTCIP funding programs by local jurisdictions is scheduled for review at the April 8, 2015, ITOC meeting.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Key Staff Contacts: Marney Cox, (619) 699-1930, [email protected] Ariana zur Nieden, (619) 699-6961, [email protected]

3 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: File Number 1200201 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT

Introduction

The TransNet Extension Ordinance and Expenditure Plan includes an Environmental Mitigation Program (EMP), which is a funding allocation category to “create a reliable approach for funding required mitigation for future transportation improvements, thereby reducing costs and accelerating project delivery (TransNet Extension Ordinance Section D).” The EMP established two funds: (1) the Biological Mitigation Fund for direct mitigation, management, and monitoring for transportation-related impacts; and (2) the Regional Habitat Conservation Fund for efforts related to regional land acquisition, management, and monitoring for implementation of the regional habitat conservation plans.

On February 22, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Caltrans, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to establish the process to implement the goals of the TransNet EMP over a ten-year period. The MOA, executed on March 19, 2008, memorialized a Plan of Finance strategy of $440 million over the ten years for the Biological Mitigation Fund and $40 million for the Regional Habitat Conservation Fund. The MOA is consistent with the TransNet EMP Implementation Guidelines adopted by the Board of Directors on September 24, 2004. The MOA was amended in August 2013 to incorporate the process and release of funding related to a provision of the TransNet Ordinance known as economic benefit.

This report provides an annual status update on the implementation of the EMP for FY 2014 and FY 2015 to date. In addition to this report, information is available to the public at KeepSanDiegoMoving.com, highlighting the current status of the program and some key accomplishments.

Discussion

To implement the TransNet EMP, two funds were created:

1. The Biological Mitigation Fund, which provides funds for the acquisition, restoration, and management of mitigation for regional transportation projects included in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and for local streets and roads; and

2. The Regional Habitat Conservation Fund, which provides funding for regional habitat management and monitoring necessary to implement habitat conservation planning throughout the region. These funds help maintain the current condition of the regional habitat preserve system, thereby reducing the likelihood that this system will degrade and reducing the need for listing of new species as endangered by the federal and state governments.

Attachments 1 and 2 provide a summary of key achievements of the program.

Status of Biological Mitigation Fund

Current Status

The initial years of the TransNet EMP focused on acquisition of uplands to take advantage of depressed land values due to the recession. Starting with the Early Action Program, acquisition opportunities were identified that met the mitigation requirements of regional transportation projects and local streets and roads.

To date, SANDAG has acquired 30 properties, totaling more than 3,400 acres throughout the region as mitigation for regional and local transportation projects. These acquisitions are shown in Attachment 1 and on the EMP section of the KeepSanDiegoMoving.com website. Acquisitions have averaged $31,236 per acre compared to $60,000 per acre originally estimated when the TransNet Extension Ordinance was developed. This has resulted in significant cost-savings over the first seven years of the program.

In FY 2015, SANDAG entered into a Conservation Bank Agreement with the state and federal wildlife agencies, memorializing credits obtained on properties acquired for mitigation in advance of project need. These conservation credits include 337.5 acres for the biological mitigation of local streets and road projects.

Future Focus

The focus of the EMP has shifted over the last year from acquisition of uplands to the restoration of both coastal and freshwater wetlands.

In August 2014, the California Coastal Commission approved the North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan, which contains a package of coastal enhancements that include the restoration of former tidal wetlands, preservation of coastal uplands, and the improvement of the ecological and hydrologic conditions of the lagoons. Additional capital improvements also are proposed within the plan during the development of the Interstate 5 and the Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor projects to facilitate better tidal circulation.

In addition to the coastal wetlands, SANDAG has secured five properties in five separate watersheds that are proposed to be developed into wetland mitigation banks. A wetland mitigation bank is recognized by the federal and state permitting agencies to have “credits” that can be used for the future mitigation of transportation projects. A formal banking enabling agreement is required that lays out the construction and crediting system to be used by SANDAG. Once established, these banks will streamline the mitigation for freshwater wetlands and potentially reduce the required mitigation by proactively creating new wetlands prior to impacts. A consulting team is being selected to develop the wetland mitigation banks and credits are expected to be developed in early

2

2016. Information on the progress of this effort will be brought to the Transportation and Regional Planning Committees for consideration in the future.

Status of Habitat Conservation Fund

Current Status

The Habitat Conservation Fund has allocated $35 million for management and monitoring activities since 2008, which has enabled SANDAG to help fill in the funding gaps for land managers throughout the region. Of that total funding, SANDAG has held six cycles of land management grants, resulting in 70 grants totaling $11.3 million. This funding is being matched with $7 million by the grantees. These land management grants allow land managers to restore, enhance, and protect endangered species and their habitat on their lands. The remaining $24 million includes regional management and monitoring activities outside of grant funding by working directly with federal and state agencies and universities. The SANDAG Board of Directors approved a seventh cycle of land management grants for which a call for projects was issued on October 1, 2014. Twenty-seven applications have been received by SANDAG and currently are being evaluated.

SANDAG also is working with the federal and state wildlife agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and universities to monitor the existing conditions of the regional open space preserve system, the pending threats to biological conservation, and actions to promote regional conservation of sensitive species and their habitats. Activities are following prioritized actions identified in the 2013 Management Strategic Plan for Conserved Lands in Western San Diego County (MSP). As recommended by the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee’s 2012 TransNet Triennial Performance audit, the MSP prioritizes management activities for species and vegetation communities as a way to inform management decisions in the region, and to link available funding from the TransNet Regional Habitat Conservation Fund to other federal, state, and local funding. Simply put, the MSP identifies what tasks need to be accomplished, why these tasks are important, and how they should be prioritized for regional funding. In September 2014, the Board of Directors approved the Regional Management and Monitoring FY 2015 and 2016 Work Plan that links funding to the implementation of four strategic goals and establishes key milestones.

In addition to the six cycles of competitive land management grants, on September 27, 2013, the SANDAG Board of Directors released the first cycle of a competitive grant program for the acquisition of land to promote regional open space and habitat conservation using economic benefit funding pursuant to the provisions of an executed MOA with state and federal agencies. Staff received 17 projects that were evaluated and ranked. On March 7, 2014, the initial results were presented to the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees. The top nine ranked projects have completed appraisals to establish their property value. Staff will be providing a recommendation on the award of grant funding to the SANDAG Board of Directors on February 27, 2015 (agenda Item No. 15).

Future Focus

Over the next year, SANDAG will focus on achieving the milestones established in the Regional Management and Monitoring FY 2015 and 2016 Work Plan. Specific key achievements include: identification of the location and management of needs of 13 rare plants; management actions necessary for the recovery of rare birds (golden eagle, cactus wren, and burrowing owls);

3

assessment of the health of vegetation communities across the region; analysis of the movement patterns and hindrances for large mammals by transportation infrastructure; and regional collaboration to initiate the first Southern California-wide standardized monitoring effort for the California Gnatcatcher.

Staff will continue to implement regional management and monitoring through grants and consultant contracts. In FY 2015, the award of the seventh cycle of land management grants and the first cycle of land acquisition grant efforts also are scheduled for completion.

Next Steps

This report is intended to be a status update of the EMP as of February 2015. Staff will return with subsequent annual reports, quarterly updates on existing land management grants, annual funding for management and monitoring, results of the Land Acquisition Grant Program, and progress on the development of wetland mitigation banks at future meetings.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Biological Mitigation Fund (Capital Improvement Project No. 1200200) 2. Regional Habitat Conservation Fund (Capital Improvement Project No. 1200300)

Key Staff Contact: Keith Greer, (619) 699-7390, [email protected]

4 Attachment 1

Biological Mitigation Fund (Capital Improvement Project No. 1200200)

Purpose: Environmental Mitigation Program (EMP), Biological Mitigation Fund. To secure mitigation for projects in the Regional Transportation Plan and local streets and roads pursuant to the TransNet Extension Ordinance and the subsequent TransNet Implementation Memorandum of Agreement (approved February 2008, amended August 2013).

TransNet EMP Acquisitions (acres) by Calendar Year

239 1051 2008 535 2009 2010 471 2011 2012 1034 72 4 2013 2014

Status: As of January 2015, 3,405 acres of land have been acquired for mitigation under the TransNet EMP. The focus has been on properties for the TransNet Early Action Program, including the State Route 76 expansion (mitigation completed), coastal rail double tracking, and the Interstate 5 corridor. A total of 157 acres of land are undergoing habitat restoration as required to meet their federal and state permits. A package of coastal habitat improvements has been approved by the California Coastal Commission as part of the North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan. Average price per acre paid was $31,235, roughly half of what was * Plus 340 acres for local streets and roads and 1,452 acres of Net Benefit estimated in 2002. A conservation bank totaling 434 acres for State Route 76 and 94. also has been established.

5 Attachment 2

Regional Habitat Conservation Fund (Capital Improvement Project No. 1200300)

Purpose: In March 2008, the SANDAG Board of Directors authorized funding pursuant to the TransNet Extension Ordinance to maintain and enhance the habitat values of the regional conservation preserve system. The Board of Directors has allocated funds to achieve four strategic goals to achieve milestones identified in a Work Plan for Fiscal Years 2015-2016. Conservation Fund Allocations by Strategic Goal as of January 2015

$21,130,000 $6,825,000

$5,600,000

$1,445,000

Promote key sensitive species Promote native vegetation communities Improve wildlife movement Promote regional coordination

Status: Through six cycles of competitive grants, SANDAG has awarded 70 grants totaling $11.3 million for land management activities throughout the region. Matching funds from the grants will total over $7 million. A seventh cycle of land management grants, and the first land acquisition grants are under way.

SANDAG has completed a Management Strategic Plan to guide future regional management and monitoring decisions. Key findings are being shared through short video clips on the Keep San Diego Moving Regional monitoring continues to shed new information on website. http://keepsandiegomoving.com/EMP/EMP-intro.aspx wildlife movement, fire management, and distribution of sensitive species.

6

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-11 FEBURARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

FY 2014 AUDITED COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL File Number 8000180 FINANCIAL REPORT

Introduction

The independent certified public accounting audit firm of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. has concluded the annual audit of SANDAG for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) is provided as an attachment to this report (Attachment 1).

Discussion

The CAFR presents the financial position and activity of SANDAG and the three component units, which include the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, SourcePoint, and the Automated Regional Justice Information System. The auditors have expressed an unqualified (clean) opinion on these basic financial statements.

In compliance with Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 114, the auditor is required to communicate certain matters to the governing body (Attachment 2). These matters include significant audit findings related to qualitative aspects of accounting practices, difficulties encountered in performing the audit, corrected and uncorrected misstatements, disagreements with management, management representations, management consultations with other independent accountants, and other audit findings or issues.

In summary, the required communications letter states that no difficulties or disagreements were encountered by the auditors in dealing with management. Regarding corrected and uncorrected misstatements, there were two uncorrected misstatements, which were deemed immaterial to the financial statements, and therefore, acceptable to the auditors:

• Adjustment to correct the balance of prepaid expenses for approximately $18,500

• Adjustment to correct the balance of violation fines revenue for approximately $22,000

The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to SANDAG for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. This was the seventh consecutive year that SANDAG received this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.

A Certificate of Achievement only is valid for a period of one year. SANDAG staff believes that the FY 2014 CAFR will continue to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements, and therefore have submitted it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. SANDAG CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 2. SAS No. 114 Required Audit Communications Letter

Key Staff Contacts: André Douzdjian, (619) 699-6931, [email protected] Leeanne Wallace, (619) 699-0728, [email protected]

2 Attachment 1

Item 11 - Attachment 1: FY 2014 AUDITED COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

The full document in electronic format can be downloaded at www.sandag.org/2014CAFR

Hard copies of will be provided at the meeting or are available by contacting the Public Information Office at (619) 699-1950 or [email protected].

3 Attachment 2

4 5 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-12 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

ANNUAL UPDATE ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE File Number 2340000 CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH DIVISION AND CLEARINGHOUSE

Introduction

As part of the SANDAG Criminal Justice Clearinghouse function, regional crime and arrest statistics as well as statistics related to drug use among the offender population are tracked and reported on a regular basis. SANDAG has maintained these statistics since the late 1980s and remains the only regional source for up-to-date historical information. These data provide timely information for policymakers and practitioners interested in how crime and law enforcement's response to it vary over time and across jurisdictions. This report provides an overview and update of the activities and accomplishments of the Criminal Justice Research Division (CJRD) and the Clearinghouse.

Discussion

Background

The overall mission of the Criminal Justice Clearinghouse is to provide timely, accurate, and objective information so that policymakers can make informed decisions about resource allocation to prevent, reduce, and control crime. The Clearinghouse was initiated as a pilot program in 1977 with state funds. After the pilot program ended in the mid-1990s, the funding plan eventually expanded to include all of the region’s cities and the County. Over time, the primary functions of the CJRD have evolved to include: (1) compiling crime and arrest trends; (2) serving as a resource for information about crime and justice for member agencies and provider agencies (justice and social services); and (3) conducting independent and objective assessments of specific programs geared to address crime and social issues through additional dedicated funding.

Analysis of Crime Trends

Since public safety is an important concern to the public, the compilation of regional crime statistics provides a means to monitor changes in scope and nature as well as the effectiveness of different public safety responses. Clearinghouse reports also include an interpretation of the most significant trends and changes. These efforts provide a single and timely source for this information, which includes an historical analysis. During the past year, a total of 8 Criminal Justice (CJ) Bulletins were distributed across the region. Topics included regional crime and arrest statistics, public safety budgets, victim/suspect characteristics, drug use trends among arrestees as well as two special publications examining how the jail and community supervision population have changed since

public safety realignment and an analysis of how many arrests involve someone under local community supervision.

In addition to these lengthier reports, reflecting CJRD’s responsiveness to the information needs of regional stakeholders, monthly CJ Flashes (formerly known as CJ Faxes) provided quick, one-page summaries regarding special topics of local interest, including the increase in mental health calls for service to law enforcement across the region, the need for trauma-informed care for youth in the delinquency system, the jump in the number of law enforcement officers assaulted, the use of drugs and frequency of driving under the influence among the arrestee population, and the issue of lack of identification for individuals reentering the community after incarceration. The CJ in Brief also was debuted – a new format that included a greater number of graphics and less text.

A recent survey (January 2015) revealed that 90 percent of CJ stakeholders use Clearinghouse information in meetings, presentations, reports, grants, and for planning purposes; 100 percent agree that public safety is a key quality of life issue; and 80 percent feel that if the Clearinghouse information was not available, the ability to do their job would be negatively impacted to some degree.

Resources and Information

The Clearinghouse maintains an extensive database on crime and research about crime prevention and control programs. Member agencies and justice entities use the data to generate funding support for new programs, draft legislative proposals, develop local ordinances, and allocate resources. Presentations also are made to community groups regarding what works to prevent crime and key public safety issues. CJRD staff serve on a number of Boards and Commissions (including the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council, Community Corrections Partnership, Methamphetamine Strike Force, and San Diego Reentry Roundtable), sharing their knowledge and experience regarding key public safety and health issues, and how process and impact evaluations can be effectively conducted to determine what about a program is working best. Staff also supported the SANDAG Executive Director in his role as a member of the City of San Diego’s Commission for Gang Prevention and Intervention. During the past year, noteworthy efforts have included providing regional statistics regarding prescription drug abuse among the arrestee population for the County’s report card, continuing to distribute information to new audiences through presentations and written articles, and documenting changes in public safety trends from around the country.

Independent and Objective Assessment of Programs

The program evaluation component of the Clearinghouse requires staff to be apprised of current funding sources and knowledgeable about topical issues in criminal justice and social services in order to develop competitive proposals. Most new programs require an outside evaluator to determine if the program was implemented as intended and to assess program effectiveness. The Clearinghouse work element provides the resources that allow staff to write grant proposals and explore funding opportunities as well as assist local agencies in writing the research design of their grant proposals. Historically, for every $1 in Clearinghouse funding, the CJRD has leveraged another $4 in funding for dedicated program evaluation. During the past year, staff collaborated with agencies from Vista to South Bay on grant proposal submissions and federally-funded grant projects.

2 In 2014, staff completed several evaluation reports that helped programs better understand the effectiveness of their efforts and documented “lessons learned” for other entities interested in replicating these strategies. Examples included studies to better understand: (1) how youth become entrenched in the justice system; (2) how the County Probation Department is implementing Evidence-Based Practice to supervise high-risk offenders; (3) how local law enforcement is utilizing information to guide targeted enforcement activities; (4) the effectiveness of mentoring when provided to high-risk offenders; and (5) the effectiveness of a pilot project to address opiate addiction among Drug Court clients. In addition, ongoing projects include efforts to document how public safety realignment is being implemented, the effectiveness of a cross-site prevention project for teens, how efforts to reinvigorate a South County neighborhood are going, and how a program to increase the use of parenting time orders is being implemented. New grants that were received included one to evaluate a new housing unit at the Vista Jail for veterans and a partnership with the City of Vista to evaluate its CalGRIP-funded effort to target gang activity in North County.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment: 1. 2015 Clearinghouse Stakeholder Survey (summary presentation)

Key Staff Contact: Cynthia Burke, (619) 699-1910, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1

2015 Clearinghouse Stakeholder Survey (summary presentation)

2015 Criminal Justice (CJ) Clearinghouse Stakeholder Survey Result Summary

Electronic Survey

• Available to complete 1/15/15 – 1/30/15

• Invitation and two reminders sent to individuals on Criminal Justice mailing lists (line staff to executive level at agencies shown on slide 3)

• 96 surveys completed by variety of stakeholders

2

4 Survey Respondent Affiliations

50%

40%

30% 29% 21% 20% 14% 13%

10% 7% 7% 6% 3% 0%

3

“Public Safety is a key quality of life issue for the region.”

100% 89%

80%

60%

40%

20% 11% 0% 0% 0% Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree

4

5 “How useful do you find SANDAG’s regional and historical crime statistics?” 80%

64% 60%

40% 36%

20%

0% 0% 0% Very Useful Somewhat Useful Not Very Useful Not Useful at All

5

94% Know About Monthly CJ Flashes 78% of These Have Shared CJ Flashes with Others (Strongly Agree = Purple; Somewhat Agree = Yellow)

100%

31% 27% 80% 39%

60%

40% 68% 73% 61% 20%

0% Interesting Useful/Relevant Easy to Read

6

6 88% Know About CJ Bulletins/In Briefs 80% of These Have Shared CJ Bulletins/In Briefs with Others (Strongly Agree = Purple; Somewhat Agree = Yellow)

100%

27% 29% 80% 37%

60%

40% 73% 70% 61% 20%

0% Interesting Useful/Relevant Easy to Read

7

How Useful Are the Different Bulletins To You? (Very Useful= Purple; Somewhat Useful = Yellow)

100% 29% 80% 32% 38% 45% 34% 43% 51% 60%

40% 71% 63% 59% 54% 59% 53% 20% 43%

0%

8

7 66% Report They Have Interacted with a CJ Staff Member Personally (Strongly Agree = Purple; Somewhat Agree = Yellow)

100% 8% 5% 15% 13% 80%

60%

92% 95% 40% 85% 85%

20%

0% Knowledgeable Contributed Professional Helpful

9

“In what ways have you ever used information produced or disseminated by the Clearinghouse?” 80%

63% 90% have used the information at least one of these ways. 60% 56%

42% 39% 40% 27%

20% 18%

0% Meetings Presentations Reports Strategic Grants Other Planning

10

8 Perceived Value of the Clearinghouse (Strongly Agree = Purple; Somewhat Agree = Yellow)

100% 24% 30% 80% 34% 30% 32% 60%

40% 76% 68% 62% 59% 48% 20%

0% Grant funds CJ CJ is useful to Resources to Have and Would Not Having CJ brings in are Law support CJ Contact CJ for Would Impact helpful Enforcement justified Assistance My Job

11

9 Agenda Item No. 13, Board of Directors, February 27, 2015 2015 MEMBERSHIP ON POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE BORDERS COMMITTEE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

North County Coastal Primary Jim Wood Lisa Shaffer Lesa Heebner, Chair Lorraine Wood Terry Sinnott, Vice Chair Mayor, City of Oceanside Councilmember, City of Encinitas Mayor, City of Solana Beach Councilmember, City of Carlsbad Councilmember, City of Del Mar

Alternate Matt Hall Mike Nichols Esther Sanchez Dwight Worden Tony Kranz Mayor, City of Carlsbad Councilmember, City of Solana Beach Councilmember, City of Oceanside Councilmember, City of Del Mar Councilmember, City of Encinitas

East County Primary Jack Dale, Chair Mary Sessom Kristine Alessio, Vice Chair John Minto, Chair Mary Sessom, Chair Councilmember, City of Santee Mayor, City of Lemon Grove Councilmember, City of La Mesa Vice Mayor, City of Santee Mayor, City of Lemon Grove

Alternate Bill Wells Bill Baber Jerry Jones Ruth Sterling Bill Wells Mayor, City of El Cajon Councilmember, City of La Mesa Councilmember, City of Lemon Grove Vice Mayor, City of La Mesa Mayor, City of El Cajon

South County Primary Ron Morrison Mary Salas, Vice Chair Carrie Downey Serge Dedina Alejandra Sotelo-Solis Mayor, City of National City Mayor, City of Chula Vista Councilmember, City of Coronado Mayor, City of Imperial Beach Councilmember, City of National City

Alternate Pamela Bensoussan Mike Woiwode Pamela Bensoussan Bill Sandke Brian Bilbray Deputy Mayor, City of Chula Vista Councilmember, City of Coronado Deputy Mayor, City of Chula Vista Councilmember, City of Coronado Councilmember, City of Imperial Beach

North County Inland Primary Chris Orlando Judy Ritter Sam Abed Jim Cunningham Steve Vaus Councilmember, City of San Marcos Mayor, City of Vista Mayor, City of Escondido Councilmember, City of Poway Mayor, City of Poway

Alternate Sam Abed Sam Abed John Aguilera Ed Gallo Amanda Rigby Mayor, City of Escondido Mayor, City of Escondido Deputy Mayor, City of Vista Councilmember, City of Escondido Councilmember, City of Vista

City of San Diego Primary Todd Gloria Todd Gloria, Chair Lorie Zapf David Alvarez Myrtle Cole Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember

Alternates Sherri Lightner Mark Kersey Mark Kersey Mark Kersey Lorie Zapf Council President Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember

Lorie Zapf Councilmember

County of San Diego Primary Ron Roberts, Vice Chair Ron Roberts Dave Roberts Greg Cox, Vice Chair Greg Cox Supervisor Supervisor Vice Chair Supervisor Supervisor

Alternates Bill Horn Bill Horn Greg Cox Dianne Jacob Dianne Jacob 2015 MEMBERSHIP ON POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE BORDERS COMMITTEE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

Chair Chair Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor

Greg Cox Supervisor OTHER VOTING MEMBERS Metropolitan Transit System Imperial County County Chiefs'/Sheriff's Association

Primary Harry Mathis John Renison, Supervisor Jim Redman Chair District 1, Imperial County Chief, El Cajon Police Department

Alternate Lorie Bragg VACANT Craig Carter Chief, Escondido Police Department

North County Transit District (NCTD) County Chiefs'/Sheriff's Association

Primary Rebecca Jones Manuel Rodriguez Vice Chair Chief, National City Police Department

Alternates Bill Horn David Bejarano Chief, Chula Vista Police Department John Aguilera

San Diego County Regional City of San Diego Police Department Airport Authority Shelley Zimmerman, Chief Primary David Alvarez City of San Diego Police Department

David Ramirez, Executive Assistant Chief Alternate Lloyd Hubbs City of San Diego Police Department

San Diego County District Attorney

Primary Bonnie Dumanis District Attorney

Alternate Adolfo Gonzales Chief, Bureau of Investigation

San Diego County Sheriff

Primary William Gore Sheriff

Alternate Ed Prendergast Undersheriff

Regional Fire/Emergency/Medical Services

2 2015 MEMBERSHIP ON POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE BORDERS COMMITTEE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

Primary Donald Butz Chief, Viejas Tribal Fire Department

Alternate Tim Isbell Chief, Bonita Fire Department

COMMITTEE ADVISORY MEMBERS Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Federal Public Safety

Bill Sherman, Acting Special Agent in Charge Primary Laurie Berman Laurie Berman Laurie Berman Drug Enforcement Administration District 11 Director District 11 Director District 11 Director

Alternates Chris Schmidt Chris Schmidt Chris Schmidt Steven C. Stafford, U.S. Marshal Acting Deputy Director Acting Deputy Director Acting Deputy Director Eric Birnbaum, Special Agent in Charge Federal Bureau of Investigation

Western Riverside Council of Metropolitan Transit System Governments (WRCOG) Federal Public Safety

BC Bell, Federal Security Director/SD Primary Mona Rios Marsha Swanson Transportation Security Administration City of Wildomar Gregory Archambeault, Field Office Director, Alternates Myrtle Cole Shellie Milne Immigration and Customs Enforcement City of Hemet Laura E. Duffy, U.S. Attorney

North County Transit District Orange County County Public Safety

Primary Don Mosier Jim Ferryman Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of Orange San Diego County Probation

Alternate Chuck Lowery Jim Dahl Yvette Klepin, Assistant Chief Probation Officer County of Orange San Diego County Probation

San Diego County Water Authority San Diego County Water Authority Department of Defense

Primary Elsa Saxod Elsa Saxod Joseph Stuyvesant Director of Operations, Navy Region Southwest

Alternate Ken Olson Ken Olson Michial Michalovich, Mission Assurance Manager MCI West-MCB Camp Pendleton

San Diego Unified Port District Baja California/Mexico State Public Safety

Primary Marshall Merrifield Remedios Gomez-Arnau Jim Abele Consul General of Mexico Chief, California Highway Patrol

Alternate Ann Moore VACANT Bob Ghiglieri Deputy Consul General Assistant Chief, California Highway Patrol

Southern California Association of Homeland Security Regional Planning Technical Working Group Governments

Primary Brad Raulston Richard Macias John Valencia, Program Manager Office of Homeland Security, City of San Diego

Alternate Jeff Murphy Tomas Oliva Holly Crawford, Director, San Diego Office 3 2015 MEMBERSHIP ON POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE BORDERS COMMITTEE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

Office of Emergency Services, County of San Diego

Regional Transit Services

Primary Jaime Becerra, Chief NCTD Security & Law Enforcement Services

Alternate Bill Burke, Director of Transit System Security Metropolitan Transit System COMMITTEE ADVISORY MEMBERS (Continued)

Southern California Tribal Chairmen's Southern California Tribal Chairmen's Southern California Tribal Chairmen's Association (SCTCA) Association Association Southern California Tribal Chairmen's Association

Primary Raymond Hunter, Sr. (Jamul) Luther Salgado (Cahuilla) Mark Romero (Mesa Grande) Eric LaChappa (La Posta) SCTCA Board Member SCTCA Board Member SCTCA Board Member SCTCA Board Member

Alternate Allen Lawson (San Pasqual) Allen Lawson (San Pasqual) Raymund Hunter, Sr. (Jamul) Leia Arviso (Inaja-Cosmit) SCTCA Board Member SCTCA Board Member SCTCA Board Member SCTCA Board Member

Department of Defense

Primary Steve Chung

Alternate Kimberly Peacher

Wildlife Conservation Board

Primary Dave Means

Alternate VACANT

California Department of Fish and Wildlife

Primary VACANT

Alternate David Mayer

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Primary Therese Bradford

Alternate Michelle Matson

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Primary VACANT

Alternate Susan Wynn

4

AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-15 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACTION REQUESTED - APPROVE FEBRUARY 27, 2015

TransNet ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PROGRAM: File Number 1200300 LAND ACQUISITION GRANT PROGRAM APPRAISAL RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATION

Introduction Recommendation

The TransNet Extension Ordinance and Expenditure The Transportation and Regional Planning Plan, approved by the voters in November 2004, Committees recommend that the Board of includes the Environmental Mitigation Program Directors approve the award of TransNet (EMP), which provides funding to mitigate habitat Environmental Mitigation Program land impacts from regional and local transportation acquisition grant funding, as provided in projects, and provides funding for regional land Attachment 1. management and biological monitoring. The EMP is a unique component of the TransNet Extension Ordinance in that it goes beyond traditional mitigation for transportation projects by including an economic benefit for habitat acquisition, management, and monitoring activities as a result of cost-savings derived from the implementation of the EMP.

On April 26, 2013, the Board of Directors amended a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with state and federal agencies on the implementation of the TransNet EMP to clarify the definition, use, and process for release of funding related to the economic benefit provision of the TransNet Extension Ordinance. On September 27, 2013, the SANDAG Board of Directors approved a $20 million competitive land acquisition grant program using the economic benefit funding. The purpose of this report is to present recommendations for the award of land acquisition grant funding for consideration by the Board of Directors (Attachment 1).

Discussion

On October 4, 2013, a call for projects was issued pursuant to eligibility and evaluation criteria adopted by the Board of Directors on September 27, 2013. The call for projects closed on January 8, 2014. SANDAG received 17 grant project proposals, which requested approximately $61 million in grant funds and proposed approximately $30 million in matching funds, for a total value of $91 million. Pursuant to the amended MOA, an evaluation committee composed of representatives from Caltrans, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Geological Survey, and SANDAG was formed to evaluate and rank the grant projects. SANDAG staff also conducted a visit to each of the proposed grant properties to verify consistency with the applications and identify any issues not addressed by the grantee. The results were presented to the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees at their respective meetings on March 7, 2014 (report available at http://www.sandag.org/TC030714). Appraisals of the top nine

grant projects with an estimated pre-appraisal value of $22 million were initiated to determine the market value of each property.

Applicants are aware that SANDAG will provide grant funding as consistent with the appraised fair- market-value of their proposed project properties and that a total of $20 million is available. With the possibility that property owners may not be willing sellers at the resulting appraised values, more projects were appraised than could be potentially funded from the $20 million available for this call for projects. This allows SANDAG to move forward with requesting Board of Directors award of funding without having to reinitiate the appraisal process in case one or more top-ranked projects withdraw from consideration.

Caltrans District 11 Right-of-Way Division supervised the appraisals using the SANDAG list of independent on-call appraisers. All appraisals were conducted to the State of California Department of General Services standards using the current provisions of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice by a Member of the Appraisal Institute. Where matching funds consisted of federal funds, the appraisals included a separate report to cover the federal appraisal standards. The results of the appraisals are shown in Column I of Attachment 1. One project, Skyline 779, was subsequently further reviewed by Caltrans Headquarters Right-of-Way to determine the most credible value of the property due to disagreements between the current appraisal and a prior appraisal completed by the owner of the property. Upon completion of the final appraisal and its acceptance, Caltrans issued appraisal certifications for each project (Attachment 2).

The appraisal values and the proposed award of grant funding were discussed by the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees at their respective February 6, 2015, meetings and both recommended approval. No additional recommendations were provided by the Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee when this item was presented at its meeting on February 11, 2015.

Recommendation

The Regional Planning and Transportation Committees are recommending that grant funding be provided for the seven projects shown in Column M of Attachment 1, totaling just under the $20 million allocated by the Board of Directors. The recommended funds are based on the pro rata share of the original estimated funding request for property acquisition compared to the appraised value and the requested funding for administration and management of the property. This recommended grant funding has been discussed with each grantee.

SANDAG staff is further recommending that a 180-day escrow be opened for each grant project with SANDAG funds being deposited when a signed Sale and Purchase Agreement between the grantee and the property owner has been placed into escrow and provided to SANDAG. Escrow would close once all matching funds have been deposited into escrow and a conservation easement or other restrictive use covenant in favor of SANDAG or another government entity is executed. Fee title would then transfer the property to the grantee and SANDAG would complete the grant by payment of the outstanding administration and management costs identified in the grant, as shown in Attachment 1.

The proposed awards would provide grant funding for the purchase of open space lands for habitat. Grant funds only will be used to acquire property from willing sellers. Eminent domain will not be utilized.

2

If escrow cannot close within 180 days, SANDAG staff will return to the Board of Directors with a recommendation on use of the remaining funds that could include but not be limited to providing additional time to close escrow, redirecting funding to another project, and/or retaining the funding for a future call for grants.

Next Steps

If the grant funding is approved by the Board of Directors, staff will work with Caltrans to establish escrow instructions and open individual escrow accounts for each grant project and will return within 180 days to report out on the results of the grant acquisitions.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Grant Funding Recommendations and Appraised Values 2. Caltrans Appraisal Certifications for Each Project

Key Staff Contact: Keith Greer, (619) 699-7390, [email protected]

3 Attachment 1

GRANT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPRAISED VALUES

A B C D E F G H I J K L M % Grant Grantee Funds Grant Funds Grant Funds Total Grant Requested Proposed Overall Estimated Requested Appraised Recommended Recommended for Award Project Title Acreage Grantee Acquisition Acquisition Appraiser Rank Acquisition for Value for Acquisition Administration =K+L Grant Funds Match Funds Value Acquisition = J*H1 and Management = E+F = E/G Endangered Habitats 1 Skyline 779 779 Conservancy $3,988,000 $1,500,000 $5,488,000 72.67% Allan Wilson, MAI $2,729,0002 $1,983,100 $925,000 $2,908,100 San Diego Mountain 2 Ranch 982 Trust for Public Land $915,300 $1,544,700 $2,460,000 37.21% Deanne Recht, MAI $2,455,000 $913,440 $24,781 $938,221 Endangered Habitats 3 Lakeside Downs 409 Conservancy $4,988,000 $2,650,000 $7,638,000 65.31% Rob Caringella, MAI $8,000,000 $5,224,404 $371,000 $5,595,404 California Department of 4 Luce Creek 391 Fish and Wildlife $1,642,200 $492,000 $2,134,200 76.95% Allan Wilson, MAI $1,564,000 $1,203.449 $5,000 $1,208,449

5 Clover Flat 763 Trust for Public Land $1,717,500 $1,722,500 $3,440,000 49.93% Deanne Recht, MAI $3,435,000 $1,715,004 $5,200 $1,720,204 Cielo Del Norte/White Escondido Creek 6 Phase B 241 Conservancy $5,500,000 $8,000,000 $13,500,000 40.74% Deanne Recht, MAI $13,200,000 $5,377,778 $832,634 $6,210,412

7 Lucky 5 Ranch 1873 Anza-Borrego Foundation $1,150,000 $2,000,000 $3,150,000 36.51% David Ottley, MAI $3,275,000 $1,195,635 $41,000 $1,236,635 Proctor Valley U.S. Fish and Wildlife 8 Paxton/Fazio Trust 40 Service - SDNWR $1,444,500 $5,200 $1,449,700 99.64% James Garrett, MAI $800,0003 $0 $0 $0

9 Beaver Hollow 120 The Nature Conservancy $750,000 $5,000 $755,000 99.34% Rob Caringella, MAI $410,0003 $0 $0 $0

Total: $22,095,500 $17,919,400 $40,014,900 55.22% $35,868,000 $17,612,809 $2,204,615

Total Award: $19,817,424

Closing Costs: $140,0004

Total Funding: $19,957,424

1 Numbers rounded to nearest dollar using full percentage of grant funds requested for acquisition (i.e., Column H not truncated to hundreds place in calculation). 2 Appraisal approved by Caltrans Headquarters as well as District 11 Right-of-Way Division. 3 Offer to acquire property at appraised value rejected by owner. Project dropped from grant program. 4 SANDAG would contribute up to $20,000 to cover closing costs for each escrow.

4 Attachment 2

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-16 BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEDERAL File Number 3320100 and 3320200 FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2014 ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES (SECTION 5310) AND FY 2016 AND FY 2017 TransNet SENIOR MINI-GRANT PROGRAMS

Introduction Recommendation

SANDAG manages two competitive grant programs for The Transportation Committee recommends specialized transportation capital and operating that the Board of Directors approve: (1) the projects and services: the Enhanced Mobility of Seniors funding recommendations for the Federal and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) Transit Administration Section 5310 and Program, which provides funds for programs to serve TransNet Senior Mini-Grant programs, in the special needs of transit-dependent populations of substantially the same form as Attachment 3 seniors and persons with disabilities; and the Senior of this report; and (2) a contingency Mini-Grant Program, which funds specialized allocation of any remaining federal funds to transportation services for senior citizens. The Section the unfunded Section 5310 projects based on 5310 Program is funded by the Federal Transit rankings should additional funding become Administration (FTA) and the Senior Mini-Grant available. Program is funded through the TransNet Extension Ordinance. The administration of the Section 5310 Program is further delineated whereby SANDAG is responsible for administering the program for the San Diego urbanized area and Caltrans Division of Mass Transportation is responsible for administering the program for the rural areas in the State of California. This report focuses on the urbanized areas of the San Diego region.

Both grant programs require that SANDAG conduct a competitive selection process to distribute the funds. Each grant program requires a matching contribution from the grantee depending on project type. Utilizing an evaluation committee, SANDAG recently completed the evaluation of proposals for both programs and an information item on the results from the competitive selection process was given at the January 16, 2015, Transportation Committee meeting. The Transportation Committee did not have any significant comments regarding the process or the evaluation results. This item brings forward a recommended list of potential projects to be funded. All projects selected for funding must be derived from the priorities identified in the 2014-2018 Coordinated Public Transit and Human Services Transportation Plan, which was adopted by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2014.

Discussion

Under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Section 5310 funds were apportioned to the State of California and Caltrans was

responsible for administering the program. Under the subsequent federal transportation authorization bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), funds now are apportioned directly to the large urbanized areas and federal guidance allows for more flexibility in the appointment of a Designated Recipient. On April 23, 2014, Governor Brown designated SANDAG as the Designated Recipient of Section 5310 funds for the San Diego urbanized area.

Another change to the Section 5310 Program under MAP-21 is the classification of two categories of projects: traditional and non-traditional Section 5310 projects. The FTA requires that at least 55 percent of available Section 5310 funds are used towards traditional Section 5310 projects, defined as “those public transportation capital projects planned, designed, and carried out to meet the specific needs of seniors and individuals with disabilities when public transportation is insufficient, unavailable, or inappropriate.” Examples of eligible expenses that meet the 55 percent requirement include vehicle procurements, purchasing support equipment such as radios or scheduling software, and mobility management activities. Up to 45 percent of available Section 5310 funds may be utilized for non- traditional Section 5310 projects. Since SANDAG uses 10 percent of the Section 5310 funds for administration of the program, only up to 35 percent of Section 5310 funds are available for non- traditional Section 5310 projects (defined as projects that exceed the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] minimum requirements, improve access to fixed-route service and decrease reliance by individuals with disabilities on ADA complementary paratransit service, or provide alternatives to public transportation that assist seniors and individuals with disabilities with transportation) for the San Diego urbanized area. Examples of eligible non-traditional Section 5310 projects include the operating costs of senior or disabled shuttle programs, travel training programs, supporting volunteer driver and aide programs, and administering voucher programs for alternatives to public transportation.

Eligible applicants for the Senior Mini-Grant Program and non-traditional Section 5310 projects include private nonprofit organizations, governmental authorities, private and public transportation operators, and the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency. Eligible applicants for traditional Section 5310 projects include private nonprofit organizations and state or local governmental authorities: (1) that are approved by a state to coordinate services for seniors and individuals with disabilities or; (2) who certify that there are no nonprofit organizations readily available in the area to provide the service.

Competitive Selection Process

A call for projects for the FTA Section 5310 and TransNet Senior Mini-Grant Programs was issued on July 25, 2014, and closed on October 24, 2014. Project submittals were evaluated and scored by external evaluation committee members using the criteria approved by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2014 (Attachment 1). The FTA Section 5310 evaluation criteria applies to both traditional and non-traditional project submittals, while there is a separate evaluation criteria for the TransNet Senior Mini-Grant project submittals. The evaluation committees were made up of experts in the field of specialized transportation, including staff from social service transportation providers, transit operators, and members of the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council. The evaluation criteria approved by the Board of Directors also included a past performance adjustment ranging from -10 percent to +2 percent for applicants who have received a Job Access and Reverse Commute, New Freedom, or Senior Mini-Grant award from SANDAG in the past three years.

2 No adjustment was made for applicants who have not had an active grant in the last three years. These adjustments were applied to each evaluator’s score for each applicable proposal to determine the project rankings for each grant program.

Before developing the ranked project lists, the SANDAG Technical Services department performed an independent review, checking the evaluation committee spreadsheet for correct formulas and consistency with the evaluation committee score sheets, the calculations used to determine the past performance adjustments, and the calculations used for the Performance Indicators section of the Senior Mini-Grant proposal. The final ranked project list provides the basis for the recommendations according to the levels of anticipated funding available.

Preliminary Ranking Results

Section 5310

The competitive process held by SANDAG was conducted in order to award grants for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2013 and FFY 2014 funding. There is $1,904,103 in funds for FFY 2013 and $1,877,738 in funds for FFY 2014 apportioned to the San Diego urbanized area after deducting 10 percent for the SANDAG grant administration allowance.

For the Section 5310 Program, a total of 14 applications were received for 80 eligible individual projects, requesting over $3 million in FFY 2013 funds and over $2.5 million in FFY 2014 funds. Of the 80 individual projects submitted, 71 are traditional Section 5310 projects and 9 are non-traditional Section 5310 projects.

The Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) submitted an application that included 18 individual projects for paratransit vehicle procurement. To have their projects considered as traditional Section 5310 projects, MTS held a public hearing at its December 11, 2014, Board of Directors meeting. The resulting MTS resolution (Attachment 2) certifies that there are no private, nonprofit organizations readily available to provide the same complementary paratransit service within the MTS service area as proposed within the MTS Section 5310 application. Consistent with Section 5310 guidance and based on this certification, the MTS projects are eligible as traditional Section 5310 projects.

Based on the preliminary ranked project list in Attachment 3, the available funding would be sufficient to fully fund 44 traditional projects and 5 non-traditional projects, funding in total 49 of the 80 eligible Section 5310 grant projects. Additionally, two traditional and one non-traditional Section 5310 projects are recommended for partial funding. To ensure compliance with FTA regulations, the percentage of funds being allocated for traditional and non-traditional projects was calculated for each year. Based on the ranking of the projects by the evaluation committee, the 55 percent threshold was met for FY 2014 funding. In FY 2015, the threshold was not met based on the initial rankings. To guarantee compliance with the 55 percent threshold in FY 2015, staff is recommending shifting $11,189 from the lowest ranked non-traditional project recommended for funding (St. Madeleine Sophie’s Center – Mileage Reimbursement Project) to the lowest ranked traditional project recommended for funding (MTS Access Vehicle Fleet Replacement Expansion). Based on these funding recommendations, 55.18 percent of the total available funds for both years combined will fund traditional projects and 34.82 percent will fund non-traditional projects.

SANDAG previously administered the New Freedom Program under SAFETEA-LU and currently is monitoring four active New Freedom projects. Under MAP-21, the New Freedom Program was folded

3 into the Section 5310 Program. Projects once eligible under the New Freedom Program are now eligible projects under the Section 5310 Program. As New Freedom projects close out, it is likely there will be some remaining funds left unspent. SANDAG will not hold any future competition to distribute unspent New Freedom funds because the New Freedom Program no longer exists. Consistent with New Freedom guidance and to utilize all remaining funding available to the region, staff is recommending reallocating any unused New Freedom funds that become available as existing projects close out to eligible Section 5310 projects based on the project rankings in Attachment 3.

Senior Mini-Grant Program

Based on the TransNet revenue estimates as reported in Item 8 in this agenda, a total of $1,490,000 in funding is projected to be available in FY 2016 and $1,563,000 in FY 2017 for the Senior Mini-Grant Program. There also is a total of $259,322 in unused previous years’ Senior Mini-Grant funding available to be rolled over into the current cycle. After distributing the rollover funds between the FY 2016 and FY 2017 funding amounts, the total amount available for grant awards is $1,611,870 in FY 2016 and $1,700,452 in FY 2017.

A total of 17 applications were received for 20 eligible individual projects, requesting nearly $2 million in FY 2016 and more than $2.6 million in FY 2017. Projects submitted included a number of eligible activities ranging from senior shuttles, volunteer driver programs, non-emergency medical transportation to mobility management, and travel training and vehicle procurement. A description of each Senior Mini-Grant Project submitted for funding for FY 2016 and FY 2017, as well as the preliminary scoring and ranking of each project, are provided in Attachment 3. Based on the preliminary ranked project list in Attachment 3, the available funding would be sufficient to fully fund 14 of the 20 eligible projects and partially fund 2 additional projects.

At its meeting on January 14, 2015, the TransNet Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee confirmed that the recommended Senior Mini-Grant grant proposals are consistent with the TransNet Extension Ordinance and Senior Mini-Grant Program requirements.

Next Steps

If the funding recommendations are approved by the Board of Directors, the projects will be amended into the 2014 Regional Transportation Improvement Program at the earliest opportunity, which allows agencies to submit the required grant applications for the Section 5310 Program. In addition, the selected grantees will be sent Notices of Award. It is anticipated that grant agreements will be issued in fall 2015.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. Project Evaluation and Scoring Criteria 2. MTS Resolution 14-14 3. Project Descriptions, Evaluation, and Grant Requests

Key Staff Contact: Audrey Porcella, (619) 699-1961, [email protected]

4 Attachment 1 FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2013 and 2014 Section 5310 Project Evaluation and Scoring Criteria

The following information and scoring criteria are used to score and rate project applications for Section 5310 funding.

Minimum Eligibility Criteria: Must answer Yes to each of the following five questions to be eligible.

1. Is the agency a local governmental agency, (private or public) operator of public transportation, nonprofit agency, or a tribal government?

2. In the applicant’s civil rights assurances, are adequate methods included for ensuring that the benefits of the project are distributed equitably amongst low-income and minority (LIM) and non-LIM population groups in its service area?

3. Will 80% of the served population consist of seniors (age 65 or older) or persons with disabilities?

4. Is the total grant request between $30,000 and $200,000 per year and is the total grant amount requested by the applying organization equal to or less than $500,000 per year?

5. Is your project derived from a Very High or High Priority strategy in the 2014 – 2018 Coordinated Plan?

: Very High

 Develop or expand transit with little or no other transportation options (or replace services that have been cut in those areas) based on identified gaps in transportation services included in the Coordinated Plan; or

 Develop or expand transportation solutions in areas with sufficient densities to support transit or coordinated services based on identified gaps in transportation services included in the Coordinated Plan.

: High

 Increase inter-agency coordination efforts to maximize existing capacity and reduce program costs;

 Provide door-to-door service (and door-through-door when necessary) for trips such as nonemergency medical transportation and grocery shopping in circumstances where paratransit is insufficient, inappropriate, or unavailable

 Improve accessibility to encourage more seniors and/or individuals with disabilities to ride public transit

 Increase work-based transit service hours of operation to assist non-traditional work schedules;

5  Study the feasibility of Non-Emergency Medical Transportation using Medicaid/Medical funding

 Improve first-mile, last-mile strategies to better connect to transit

SCORING CRITERIA: The information and scoring criteria below will be used to score and rate project applications for New Freedom funding.

Organization Application

A. Goals and Objectives (15 points)

 Will the project serve the appropriate population? Does the proposal provide pertinent demographic data and/or maps? (5 points)

 Will the proposed program increase or enhance the availability of transportation for seniors and/or disabled individuals? (5 points)

 Will the program serve a low income or minority area? Does the applicant describe how it will communicate with persons with Limited English Proficiency? Have the Title VI Program documents that were to be turned in with the application provided? (5 points)

B. Coordination and Program Outreach (15 points)

 Does the proposal describe how key stakeholders will remain involved and informed throughout the process? Did the applicant attach one or more letters from other agencies describing how they will be coordinating with the applicant in the provision of transportation services? (The CTSA and public transit operators proposing a fixed-route project are exempt from submitting letters) (5 points)

 How comprehensive are the applicant’s proposed strategies for marketing the program and promoting public awareness (specifically including both low income and minority areas as well as populations with limited English proficiency)? (5 points)

 To what extent does the project demonstrate coordination among various entities? (5 point maximum – 1 point per type of coordination)

: Shared use of vehicles

: Dispatching or scheduling

: Maintenance

: Back up transportation

: Staff training programs

: Joint procurement of services and supplies

: Active participation in local social service transportation planning process

: Coordination of client trips with other transportation agencies

6 Project-Specific Application – Operating and Mobility Management Projects

C. Operational/Implementation Plan (15 points)

 How thorough is the implementation plan? Does the proposal include project tasks, timelines, benchmarks, key milestones, key personnel, deliverables, and routes and schedules as applicable? Does the implementation plan and timeline seem feasible? (5 points)

 Does this project relate to other services or facilities provided by the agency or firm? Does the operational plan correspond with the project goals/objectives? (5 points)

 Is the scope of work thorough? Does the scope of work include all commitments made in other section of the proposal? Is the scope of work within the capacity of the applicant to accomplish? (5 points)

D. Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators (20 points)

 Is the proposed cost per trip reasonable given the service being provided? (5 points)

 Does the proposal describe efforts to ensure the project’s cost-effectiveness (and other measurable units of service)? (5 points)

 Does the proposal provide measurable performance indicators to measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed project in meeting the identified goals? (5 points)

 Does the applicant describe methodologies and procedures for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the project or service, and steps to be taken if original goals are not achieved? (5 points)

E. Sustainability (10 points)

 Has the applicant thoroughly pursued other sources of funding for this project? (5 points)

 Does the applicant demonstrate a long-term commitment to the project to continue the effort beyond the availability of the requested grant resources? Is this applicant financially capable of sustaining operations after the initial grant funding is expended? (5 points)

F. Innovation (10 points)

 Is the proposed project an innovative solution to addressing the need, and could the innovations be applied to other services in the region? (5 points)

 Are there elements of the project that are environmental sustainable (including the use of alternative fuels and clean air vehicles) and/or are there provisions that ensure the equitable distribution of services? (5 points)

7 G. Project Budget (15 points)

 Was a clearly defined budget submitted for the proposed project? (5 points)

 Does the project appear to be feasible as described? (5 points)

 Is the source of local share stable? (5 points)

Project-Specific Application – Capital Projects

H. Operational/Implementation Plan (15 points)

 How thorough is the applicant’s description of the project’s service parameters? (10 points maximum – 2 points per components addressed)

: Type of service provided (i.e. fixed route, demand response, etc.)

: Dispatching and scheduling procedures

: Preventative and routine maintenance

: Driver training

: How the implementation of this project corresponds with the program’s goals/objectives

 Is the scope of work thorough? Does the scope of work include all commitments made in other section of the proposal? Is the scope of work within the capacity of the applicant to accomplish? (5 points)

I. Program Effectiveness and Performance Indicators (20 points)

 What is the proposed service hours per week to be provided with the requested vehicle(s)?

Over 35 hours per week = 5 31 to 34 = 4 27 to 30 = 3 23 to 26 = 2 20 to 22 = 1 0 to 19 hours per week = 0

 What is the proposed seat utilization for the requested vehicle?

Equal to or greater than 70% = 5 60%

8  Is the program’s cost per trip reasonable given the service being provided? (5 points)

 Does the applicant describe methodologies and procedures for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the project or service, and steps to be taken if original goals are not achieved? (5 points)

J. Sustainability (10 points)

 Has the applicant thoroughly pursued other sources of funding for this project? (5 points)

 Does the applicant demonstrate a long-term commitment to the project? Is this applicant financially capable of sustaining operations for the vehicle(s) requested? (5 points)

K. Innovation (10 points)

 Is the proposed project an innovative solution to addressing the need, and could the innovations be applied to other services in the region? (5 points)

 Are there elements of the project that are environmental sustainable (including the use of alternative fuels and clean air vehicles) and/or are there provisions that ensure the equitable distribution of services? (5 points)

L. Project Budget (15 points)

 Was a clearly defined budget submitted for the proposed project? (5 points)

 Does the project appear to be feasible as described? (5 points)

 Is the source of local share stable? (5 points)

Total Application

M. Past Performance (-10% to +2 % adjustment to total score)

If the applicant has held a JARC, New Freedom, or Senior Mini-Grant award from SANDAG in the past three years their performance in operating and managing the most recent 12-month period of those grants will be used to determine if an adjustment to the total score is appropriate. No adjustments will be made for applicants who have not had an active grant in the past three years.

The following four indicators will be used to determine the past performance adjustment. The data used for the first two indicators will be compared to the original proposals submitted, while the last two will be based on ongoing project evaluations and onsite assessment visits. Each category will receive a score ranging from -2.5% to +.5%. For those applicants with more than one existing grant, an average of the performance criteria scores will be used.

9 1. Cost per unit of service delivered (A unit can be one-way passenger trips, web hits, or referrals, etc.)

• 10 % or more under proposed cost per unit (+.5%) • +/- 10% of proposed cost per unit (0%) • 10 – 15 % or more over proposed cost per unit (-.5%) • 15 – 20% or more over proposed cost per unit (-1.0%) • 20 – 25% or more over proposed cost per unit (-1.5%) • 25 – 30% or more over proposed cost per unit (-2.0%) • 30% or more over proposed cost per unit (-2.5%)

2. Number of units of service delivered

• 10 % or more over proposed number of units of service (+.5%) • Within 10% more or less of proposed number of units of service (0%) • 10 – 15 % or more under proposed number of units of service (-.5%) • 15 – 20% or more under proposed number of units of service (-1.0%) • 20 – 25% or more under proposed number of units of service (-1.5%) • 25 – 30% or more under proposed number of units of service (-2.0%) • 30% or more under proposed number of units of service (-2.5%)

3. Project Management – How well did the grantee manage their project? (-2.5% to +.5 %)

Project Management will be evaluated based on SANDAG’s observations of the grantees operation and management including, but not limited to, the following:

• Budget management • Administration costs • Coordination • Service area adherence • Project schedule • Invoice and report quality and consistency

4. Service Quality – Did the grantee provide a quality service? (-2.5% to +.5 %)

Service Quality will be based on written evaluations prepared by SANDAG during onsite visits to the grantee including, but not limited to, the following:

• Customer Satisfaction • Safety • Training • Outreach • Quality Control Measures

10 Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017 Senior Mini-Grant Project Evaluation and Scoring Criteria

The following information and scoring criteria are used to score and rate project applications for Senior Mini-Grant funding.

Minimum Eligibility Criteria: Must answer Yes to each of the following five questions to be eligible.

1. Is the agency a local governmental agency, (private or public) operator of public transportation, nonprofit agency, or a tribal government?

2. In the applicant’s civil rights assurances, are adequate methods included for ensuring that the benefits of the project are distributed equitably amongst low-income and minority (LIM) and non-LIM population groups in its service area?

3. Will 80% of the riders be seniors (age 60 and older)?

4. Is the total grant request per project between $30,000 and $200,000 per year and is the total grant amount requested by the applying agency equal to or less than $500,000 per year?

5. Is the project derived from a Very High or High Priority strategy in the 2014 – 2018 Coordinated Plan?

: Very High

 Develop or expand transit in areas with little or no other transportation options (or replace services that have been cut in those areas, such as transit or school bus transportation) based on identified gaps in transportation services included in the Coordinated Plan; or

 Develop or expand transportation solutions in areas with sufficient densities to support transit or coordinated services based on identified gaps in transportation services included in the Coordinated Plan.

: High

 Increase inter-agency coordination efforts to maximize existing capacity and reduce program costs;

 Improve accessibility to encourage more senior individuals to ride public transit;

 Provide door-to-door service (and door-through-door when necessary) for trips such as non-emergency medical transportation and grocery shopping in circumstances where paratransit is insufficient, inappropriate, or unavailable;

 Study the feasibility of nonemergency medical transportation using Medicaid/Medical funding; or

 Improve first-mile, last-mile strategies to better connect to transit.

11 SCORING CRITERIA: The information and scoring criteria below will be used to score and rate project applications for Senior Mini-Grant funding.

ORGANIZATION APPLICATION

A. Goals and Objectives (15 points)

 Will the project serve the appropriate population? Does the proposal provide pertinent demographic data and/or maps? (5 points)

 Will the proposed program increase or enhance the availability of transportation for seniors? (5 points)

 To what extent is the proposed project consistent with the goals and objectives of the Senior Mini-Grant program? (5 points)

B. Coordination and Program Outreach (15 points)

 Does the proposal describe how key stakeholders will remain involved and informed throughout the process? Did the applicant attach one or more letters from other agencies describing how they will be coordinating with the applicant in the provision of transportation services? (The CTSA and public transit operators proposing a fixed-route project are exempt from submitting letters)(5 points)

 How comprehensive are the applicant’s proposed strategies for marketing the project and promoting public awareness in both low income and minority areas as well as populations with limited English proficiency? (5 points)

 To what extent does the project demonstrate coordination among various entities? (5 point maximum – 1 point per type of coordination)

 Shared use of vehicles

 Dispatching or scheduling

 Maintenance

 Back up transportation

 Staff training programs

 Joint procurement of services and supplies

 Active participation in local social service transportation planning process

 Coordination of client trips with other transportation agencies

PROJECT-SPECIFIC APPLICATION

C. Operational/Implementation Plan (15 points)

 How thorough is the implementation plan? Does the proposal include project tasks, timelines, benchmarks, key milestones, key personnel, deliverables, and routes and schedules as applicable? Does the implementation plan and timeline seem feasible? (5 points)

 Does this project relate to other services or facilities provided by the agency or firm? Does the operational plan correspond with the project goals/objectives? (5 points)

12  Does the scope of work match the level of service as described in the project proposal? Is the scope of work within the capacity of the applicant to accomplish? (5 points)

D. Program Effectiveness (10 points)

 Does the applicant describe methodologies and procedures for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the project or service, and steps to be taken if original goals are not achieved? (5 points)

 Is the proposed cost per trip reasonable given the service being provided? (5 points)

E. Operational Sustainability (5 points)

 Does the applicant demonstrate a long-term commitment to the project to continue the effort beyond the availability of the requested grant resources? Is this applicant financially capable of sustaining operations after the initial grant funding is expended? (5 points)

F. Innovation (10 points)

 Is the proposed project an innovative solution to addressing the need, and could the innovations be applied to other services in the region? (5 points)

 Are there elements of the project that are environmentally sustainable (including the use of alternative fuels and clean air vehicles)? Does the project include provisions that ensure the equitable distribution of services? (5 points)

G. Project Budget (15 points)

 Was a clearly defined budget submitted for the proposed project? (5 points)

 Does the project appear to be feasible as described? (5 points)

 Is the source of local share stable? (5 points)

H. Performance Indicators (5 points each; maximum 15 points)

 Cost Efficiency Indicator – Operating Cost in Dollars per Vehicle Service Hour # of Years in Service Points Proposed/1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4+ year 0 >70 >65 >60 >55 1 65

 Cost Effectiveness Indicator – Operating Cost in Dollars per Passenger # of Years in Service Points Proposed/1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4+ year 0 >32 >29 >26 >23 1 29

13  Service Effectiveness Indicator – Passenger Utilization in Percentages # of Years in Service Points Proposed/1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4+ year 0 <15 <20 <35 <30 1 15≤x<25 20≤x<30 25≤x<35 30≤x<40 3 25≤x<35 30≤x<40 35≤x<45 40≤x<50 5 ≥35 ≥40 ≥45 ≥50

I. Past Performance (-10% to +2 % adjustment to total score) If the applicant has held a JARC, New Freedom or Senior Mini-Grant award from SANDAG in the past three years their performance in operating and managing the most recent 12 month period of those grants will be used to determine if an adjustment to the total score is appropriate. No adjustments will be made for applicants who have not had an active grant in the past three years.

The following four indicators will be used to determine the past performance adjustment. The data used for the first two indicators will be compared to the original proposals submitted, while the last two will be based on ongoing project evaluations and onsite assessment visits. Each category will receive a score ranging from -2.5% to +.5%. For those applicants with more than one existing grant, an average of the performance criteria scores will be used.

5. Cost per unit of service delivered (A unit can be one-way passenger trips, web hits, or referrals, etc)

• 10 % or more under proposed cost per unit (+.5%) • +/- 10% of proposed cost per unit (0%) • 10 – 15 % or more over proposed cost per unit (-.5%) • 15 – 20% or more over proposed cost per unit (-1.0%) • 20 – 25% or more over proposed cost per unit (-1.5%) • 25 – 30% or more over proposed cost per unit (-2.0%) • 30% or more over proposed cost per unit (-2.5%) 6. Number of units of service delivered • 10 % or more over proposed number of units of service (+.5%) • Within 10% more or less of proposed number of units of service (0%) • 10 – 15 % or more under proposed number of units of service (-.5%) • 15 – 20% or more under proposed number of units of service (-1.0%) • 20 – 25% or more under proposed number of units of service (-1.5%) • 25 – 30% or more under proposed number of units of service (-2.0%) • 30% or more under proposed number of units of service (-2.5%) 7. Project Management – How well did the grantee manage their project? (-2.5% to +.5 %) Project Management will be evaluated based on SANDAG’s observations of the grantees operation and management including, but not limited to, the following: • Budget management • Administration costs • Coordination • Service area adherence

14 • Project schedule • Invoice and report quality and consistency 8. Service Quality – Did the grantee provide a quality service? (-2.5% to +.5 %)

Service Quality will be based on written evaluations prepared by SANDAG during onsite visits to the grantee including, but not limited to, the following:

• Customer Satisfaction • Safety • Training • Outreach • Quality Control Measures

15 Attachment 2

SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM

RESOLUTION NO. 14-14

MTS's application for Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 funds

WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) established a capital grant program, as set forth in Section 5310 of Title 49 of the United States Code, for meeting the transportation needs of seniors and individuals with disabilities ("FTA Section 5310");

WHEREAS, FTA Section 5310 funds are being awarded by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), through a competitive application process; and

WHEREAS, FTA Section 5310 provides that funds may be apportioned to a local governmental authority to provide transportation services if there are no private, nonprofit organizations readily available in the area to provide the proposed services; and

WHEREAS, SANDAG requires that any localgovernmental authority applying for FTA Section 5310 funding must provide proof that there are no private, nonprofit organizations readily available in the area to provide the same proposed services by doing the following: 1) holding a public hearing certifying that no private, nonprofit organizations are readily available; 2) providing sufficient notice of such public hearing; 3) providing private, nonprofit, transportation providers with individual notice of the public hearing; and 4) passing a resolution certifying that there are no private, nonprofit organizations readily available to provide the same complementary paratransit within MTS's service area ; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 11, 2014 to certify that there are no private, nonprofit organization readily available to provide the same complementary paratransit service within MTS's service area; and

WHEREAS, prior notice of the date, time and specific purpose of said public hearing was published by MTS in a newspaper of general circulation on November 10, 2014, at least 30 days prior to the date of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, prior notice of the date, time and specific purpose of said public hearing was sent individually to twenty-one private, nonprofit, transportation providers in San Diego County on November 10, 2014, at least 30 days prior to the date of the public hearing; and

WHEREAS, no comments or testimony has been received to demonstrate there are any private, nonprofit organizations readily available to provide the same complementary paratransit service within MTS's service area; and

NOW THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Board of Directors that San Diego Metropolitan Transit System has determined that no private, nonprofit organization is readily available to provide the same complementary paratransit service in MTS's service area as proposed in MTS's application for FTA Section 5310 FFY 2013 and FFY 2014 federalfunds.

16 PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors this 1 1th day of December 2014 by the following vote:

AyES:A\vwe1å -?fr,rÞî"yffi j*ll:,,:d jiiäþ M Lejet\c t?iä,*'.äi NAYS:

nesENr: Lo. M¿sa- rePresoto+ive

ABSTAINING:

Chairperson San Diego Metropolitan Transit System

Filed by: Approved as to form:

politan Transit System San Diego Metropolitan Transit System

17 Attachment 3

SENIOR MINI-GRANT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS, EVALUATION, AND GRANT REQUESTS Senior Mini-Grant Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank*

The Coronado Seniors Out and About program will Goals and Objectives 14.50 15 Coordination and Program provide transportation services to seniors that reside in 13.75 15 Outreach the City of Coronado. The services will include a FY16 $47,978 $47,978 Operational/ City of Coronado - volunteer driver program that will allow seniors to 14.50 15 Implementation Plan Coronado Seniors Out schedule a ride to help them access destinations such as 1 1 20% Program Effectiveness 9.25 10 4 and About Volunteer programs at the newly remodeled Coronado Senior Operational Sustainability 4.25 5 Driver Program Center (scheduled to open in Fall of 2016), the Innovation 9.00 10 Coronado Community Center, groceries, medical FY17 $40,022 $40,022 Project Budget 13.75 15 appointments, and more. Operating funds have been Performance Indicators 15.00 15 requested. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program On the Go : Northern San Diego (OTG NSD) provides 14.50 15 Outreach seniors residing in Clairemont, University City, La Jolla, FY16 $146,886 $146,886 Operational/ Carmel Valley, and Del Mar with specialized 15.00 15 Jewish Family Services - Implementation Plan transportation through its Rides and Smiles volunteer 22On the Go: Northern San 20% Program Effectiveness 9.25 10 9 driver program and Shuttles services. The project will Diego Operational Sustainability 4.50 5 expand the OTG NSD service area to include Pacific Innovation 9.00 10 Beach and Bay Park. Operating funds have been FY17 $151,293 $151,293 Project Budget 14.00 15 requested. Performance Indicators 11.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program On the Go: North County Inland (OTG NCI) provides 14.50 15 Outreach seniors residing in the North County Inland region FY16 $139,063 $139,063 Operational/ (Miramar, Scripps Ranch, Poway, Rancho Penasquitos, 14.50 15 Jewish Family Services - Implementation Plan and Rancho Bernardo) with specialized transportation 32On the Go: North County 20% Program Effectiveness 9.50 10 9 through its Rides and Smiles volunteer driver program Inland Operational Sustainability 4.50 5 and Shuttles services. The project will expand the OTG Innovation 9.00 10 NCI service area to include Escondido. Operating funds FY17 $143,235 $143,235 Project Budget 14.25 15 have been requested. Performance Indicators 11.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program 14.50 15 On the Go: Eastern San Diego (OTG ESD) provides Outreach FY16 $142,919 $142,919 seniors residing in the eastern San Diego region (La Operational/ 15.00 15 Jewish Family Services - Mesa, Spring Valley, Mid-City, Grantville, Allied Gardens, Implementation Plan 44On the Go: Eastern San Mira Mesa, Tierrasanta, and San Carlos) with specialized 20% Program Effectiveness 8.75 10 16 Diego transportation through its Rides and Smiles volunteer Operational Sustainability 4.25 5 driver program and Shuttles services. Operating funds Innovation 8.50 10 have been requested. FY17 $147,205 $147,205 Project Budget 13.50 15 Performance Indicators 11.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10%

18 Senior Mini-Grant Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program 12.00 15 The Out and About Peninsula program will continue to Outreach FY16 $48,000 $48,000 provide cost-effective supplemental transportation for Operational/ 14.00 15 seniors living in the Peninsula communities (Point Loma, Implementation Plan Peninsula Shepherd - 55 Ocean Beach, Midway/Sports Arena). Transportation 20% Program Effectiveness 8.50 10 28 Out and About Peninsula options include volunteer/escort service and door- Operational Sustainability 3.25 5 through-door shopping van shuttle service. Operating Innovation 7.75 10 funds have been requested. FY17 $52,000 $52,000 Project Budget 13.75 15 Performance Indicators 15.00 15 Performance Adjustment 0.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.75 15 % Coordination and Program 12.25 15 Outreach FY16 $87,865 $87,865 Seniors A Go Go provides seniors residing within San Operational/ 14.00 15 Diego County with door-through-door services to non- Implementation Plan ElderHelp - Seniors A Go 66 emergency medical appointments, grocery shopping, 20% Program Effectiveness 9.50 10 29 Go social visits, classes, and other essential errands and Operational Sustainability 4.75 5 appointments. Operating funds have been requested. Innovation 8.75 10 FY17 $93,318 $93,318 Project Budget 14.25 15 Performance Indicators 13.00 15 Performance Adjustment -2.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.25 15 % Coordination and Program Rides4Neighbors provides transportation by volunteer 13.25 15 Outreach drivers using their own vehicles to meet the essential FY16 $200,000 $200,000 Operational/ needs of eligible seniors and/or disabled adults 14.00 15 Implementation Plan City of La Mesa - throughout East County. Rides4Neighbors also includes 77 20% Program Effectiveness 8.75 10 31 Rides4Neighbors taxicab vouchers, accessible vans, a shuttle program, taxi Operational Sustainability 4.00 5 script discounts, and an annual Senior Expo, which Innovation 9.00 10 provides transportation resources and education for FY17 $200,000 $200,000 Project Budget 13.75 15 seniors. Operating funds have been requested. Performance Indicators 10.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program 14.00 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project seeks to increase Outreach FY16 $30,000 $30,000 FACT's ability to provide a demand-response, curb-to- Operational/ Full Access and 12.50 15 curb, door-to-door, or door-through-door transportation Implementation Plan Coordinated 87 service for seniors and persons with disabilities in San 80% Program Effectiveness 9.25 10 31 Transportation (FACT) - Diego County. Capital funds have been requested to Operational Sustainability 4.25 5 Vehicle Fleet Expansion support the purchase of up to seven accessible mini- Innovation 9.00 10 vans. FY17 $30,000 $30,000 Project Budget 13.00 15 Performance Indicators 10.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10%

19 Senior Mini-Grant Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 12.25 15 % Coordination and Program 13.00 15 Outreach The SenioRide program will continue to provide mobility FY16 $0 $0 Operational/ options for low and fixed income seniors throughout 12.25 15 Implementation Plan Travelers Aid Society of San Diego. SenioRide offers a selection of transportation 99 20% Program Effectiveness 8.00 10 33 San Diego - SenioRide options that consists of taxicab vouchers, door-to-door Operational Sustainability 4.25 5 service reimbursement, and a volunteer driver program. Innovation 7.25 10 Operating funds have been requested. FY17 $198,535 $198,535 Project Budget 12.00 15 Performance Indicators 15.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Out & About Vista provides senior residents in the Vista Coordination and Program 12.50 15 community with transportation through it's three-part Outreach FY16 $0 $0 program: a Senior Shuttle Service (which provides door- Operational/ 14.50 15 to-door bus service), a volunteer driver mileage Implementation Plan City of Vista - Out & 10 10 reimbursement component (which utilizes volunteers in 20% Program Effectiveness 9.25 10 37 About Vista the community to provide transportation in privately Operational Sustainability 4.25 5 owned vehicles), and a discounted taxi scrip component Innovation 9.25 10 filling the service gaps. Operating funds have been FY17 $106,171 $106,171 Project Budget 13.50 15 requested. Performance Indicators 10.00 15 Performance Adjustment 0.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program 13.75 15 Outreach The proposed project will provide seniors with the FY16 $195,952 $195,952 Operational/ following transportation options: curb-to-curb taxi script 14.25 15 City of Oceanside - Implementation Plan subsidies, door-to-door shuttle services, and door- 11 11 Solutions for Seniors on 20% Program Effectiveness 8.50 10 39 through-door volunteer driver services. The program is the Go Operational Sustainability 3.50 5 available for seniors that no longer drive a personal Innovation 8.00 10 vehicle. Operating funds have been requested. FY17 $200,000 $200,000 Project Budget 13.75 15 Performance Indicators 11.00 15 Performance Adjustment -1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.80 15 The Medical and Dialysis Transportation for Seniors & Coordination and Program 13.80 15 Disabled project will subsidize the costs of medical trips Outreach FY16 $200,000 $200,000 provided through RideFACT. RideFACT, a dial-a‐ride Operational/ 13.50 15 FACT - Medical and service for seniors and persons with disabilities, is Implementation Plan 12 12 Dialysis Transportation available for travel in all 18 cities in San Diego County. 20% Program Effectiveness 8.75 10 41 for Seniors & Disabled RideFACT is a safety net travel option, available to senior Operational Sustainability 3.75 5 and disabled clients who do not have any other Innovation 9.00 10 transportation options. Operating funds have been FY17 $200,000 $200,000 Project Budget 12.75 15 requested. Performance Indicators 8.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10%

20 Senior Mini-Grant Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.25 15 Coordination and Program 11.50 15 Outreach Mountain Health & Headquartered in Campo, the volunteer driver program FY16 $52,815 $52,815 Operational/ Community Services - assists seniors and individuals with disabilities in 13.75 15 Implementation Plan Volunteer Driver accessing vital services and resources, including medical 13 13 20% Program Effectiveness 8.75 10 56 Program for Senior & appointments, shopping, and transportation to other Operational Sustainability 3.50 5 Disabled Mountain social service organizations throughout the County. Innovation 7.75 10 Operating funds have been requested. Empire Residents FY17 $53,522 $53,522 Project Budget 12.50 15 Performance Indicators 6.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.75 15 Coordination and Program The On the Move senior transportation program 9.75 15 Outreach provides free, accessible, and flexible transportation FY16 $35,000 $35,000 Operational/ throughout the San Marcos community through a senior 12.00 15 City of San Marcos - Implementation Plan taxi voucher program. This project will allow the City of 14 14 On the Move 20% Program Effectiveness 8.75 10 58 San Marcos to increase the number of taxi vouchers Transportation Program Operational Sustainability 3.75 5 distributed to seniors on a monthly basis and enhance Innovation 7.00 10 the availability of transportation for seniors. Operating FY17 $0 $0 Project Budget 13.75 15 funds have been requested. Performance Indicators 11.00 15 Performance Adjustment 0.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Coordination and Program 14.00 15 The Administration of Medical and Dialysis Outreach FY16 $200,000 $200,000 Transportation for Seniors & Disabled project will Operational/ FACT - Administration of 13.75 15 support administrative expenses for providing the Implementation Plan Medical and Dialysis 15 15 transportation solutions call center, operating RideFACT, 20% Program Effectiveness 8.50 10 59 Transportation for managing FACT's Transportation Brokerage, and Operational Sustainability 4.75 5 Seniors & Disabled improving coordination and planning with stakeholders. Innovation 9.25 10 Operating funds have been requested. FY17 $200,000 $85,151 Project Budget 12.75 15 Performance Indicators 0.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10%

21 Senior Mini-Grant Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program The Expanding to South County project will provide 9.00 15 Outreach individualized transportation services to South County, a FY16 $85,392 $85,392 Operational/ region not currently served by the ITN (Independent 13.50 15 ITN Greater San Diego - Implementation Plan Transportation Network) model. ITN Greater San Diego, 16 15 Expanding to South 20% Program Effectiveness 8.00 10 59 the successor of ITN San Diego, utilizes volunteer drivers County Operational Sustainability 3.75 5 to provide door-through-door and arm-through-arm Innovation 5.75 10 transportation to seniors residing in San Diego County . FY17 $98,456 $0 Project Budget 13.25 15 Operating funds have been requested. Performance Indicators 10.00 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Funded Project Subtotals: $3,525,627 $3,312,322

Projects Not Recommended For Funding

Section Average Scores Requested Recommended Req'd Rank Rank Sponsor Project Description FY Total Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 9.75 15 Coordination and Program The Community Connection Transportation 10.75 15 Outreach (CommConnect) program provides transportation for FY16 $34,781 $0 BAME Renaissance Operational/ seniors, veterans, low-income, and disabled residents in 9.75 15 Community Development Implementation Plan the greater Logan Heights area. The program is 17 17 Corporation - Community 20% Program Effectiveness 7.75 10 68 designed to fill transportation service gaps to allow for Connection Operational Sustainability 2.75 5 those in the service area to travel to events, medical Transportation Innovation 7.00 10 appointments, and other life-enhancing destinations. FY17 $51,046 $0 Project Budget 11.25 15 Operating funds have been requested. Performance Indicators 15.00 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.50 15 The TransMed for Seniors program provides door-to- Coordination and Program 13.25 15 door and door-through-door non-emergency Outreach FY16 $0 $0 transportation to seniors who live in the north inland Operational/ Friends of Adult Day 12.75 15 part of San Diego County and Ramona. FADHCC Implementation Plan Health Care Centers 18 18 coordinates with the Poway Adult Day Health Care 20% Program Effectiveness 8.25 10 70 (FADHCC) - TransMed for Center (PADHCC) to leverage resources and provide Operational Sustainability 2.75 5 Seniors transportation to seniors enrolled in the PADHCC as well Innovation 9.00 10 as seniors in the area that require specialized FY17 $144,648 $200,000 Project Budget 12.25 15 transportation. Operating funds have been requested. Performance Indicators 0.00 15 Performance Adjustment -1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 11.80 15 Coordination and Program The Senior Transportation Program provides free, 10.60 15 Outreach reliable shuttle services and rides scheduled on an as- FY16 $180,000 $0 Operational/ needed basis for seniors in the North County and in high- 13.20 15 Alpha Project for the Implementation Plan need areas in San Diego. The program serves the 19 18 Homeless - Senior 20% Program Effectiveness 8.60 10 70 transportation needs of seniors who would otherwise Transportation Program Operational Sustainability 4.00 5 have no access to transportation to support their Innovation 8.20 10 independence through community-based services. FY17 $180,000 $0 Project Budget 12.80 15 Operating funds have been requested. Performance Indicators 7.00 15 Performance Adjustment -4.5% +2% -> -10%

22 Senior Mini-Grant Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 11.00 15 Coordination and Program 7.75 15 The We Get Around! program teaches older adults Outreach FY16 $82,195 $0 (aged 60+) and individuals with disabilities to travel Operational/ 10.75 15 Sunrise Church of Christ independently and safely on MTS fixed-route services. Implementation Plan 20 20 of South Bay - The program provides weekly group travel training 20% Program Effectiveness 6.00 10 80 We Get Around! classes and refresher courses that utilizes curriculum Operational Sustainability 3.00 5 designed specifically for older learners, Operating funds Innovation 8.00 10 have been requested. FY17 $82,195 $0 Project Budget 10.25 15 Performance Indicators 0.00 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Unfunded Projects Subtotals: $754,865 $0

Note: Note: * - The projects are ranked based on the “Total Rank”. The total rank is calculated by using each evaluator’s scores to determine their individual rankings for the project. For an individual evaluator, the project they score the highest would get one point towards the total rank from that evaluator. The second highest score that evaluator gave would get two points, and so on. The different evaluator’s rankings are then added up for each project. The project with the lowest total rank score ranks the highest overall.

23 SECTION 5310 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS, EVALUATION, AND GRANT REQUESTS Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank*

Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Jewish Family Services operates On the Go (OTG): Coordination and Program 14.50 15 Jewish Family Services Transportation Solutions for Older Adults, which FY13 $34,890 $34,890 Outreach - provides a variety of transit options and supportive Operational/ 15.00 15 On the Go services that assist older adults. The OTG Shuttles Implementation Plan 1 1 program provides seniors with transportation to grocery 20% 26 Minivan #1 Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 stores, community activities, and medical appointments Operational Sustainability 9.75 10 to help reduce isolation and improve their overall quality FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 8.75 10 of life. Capital funds have been requested for vehicle Project Budget 14.50 15 Traditional procurement. Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 Jewish Family Services operates On the Go (OTG): Coordination and Program Transportation Solutions for Older Adults, which 14.50 15 Jewish Family Services FY13 $34,890 $34,890 Outreach provides a variety of transit options and supportive - Operational/ services that assist older adults. The OTG Shuttles 15.00 15 On the Go Implementation Plan 2 1 program provides seniors with transportation to grocery 20% 26 Minivan #2 Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 stores, community activities, and medical appointments Operational Sustainability 9.75 10 to help reduce isolation and improve their overall quality FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 8.75 10 of life. Capital funds have been requested for vehicle Project Budget 14.50 15 Traditional procurement. Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 On the Go: North County Inland (OTG NCI) provides Coordination and Program 14.50 15 Jewish Family Services seniors residing in the North County Inland region FY13 $92,708 $92,708 Outreach - (Miramar, Scripps Ranch, Poway, Rancho Penasquitos, Operational/ 14.50 15 On the Go: and Rancho Bernardo) with specialized transportation Implementation Plan 3 3 50% 59 North County Inland through its Rides and Smiles volunteer driver program Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 and Shuttles services. The project will expand the OTG Operational Sustainability 9.25 10 NCI service area to include Escondido. Operating funds FY14 $95,491 $95,491 Innovation 9.00 10 have been requested. Project Budget 14.50 15 Non-Traditional Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 On the Go : Northern San Diego (OTG NSD) provides Coordination and Program 14.50 15 Jewish Family Services seniors residing in Clairemont, University City, La Jolla, FY13 $97,922 $97,922 Outreach - Carmel Valley, and Del Mar with specialized Operational/ 14.50 15 On the Go: transportation through its Rides and Smiles volunteer Implementation Plan 4 3 50% 59 Northern San Diego driver program and Shuttles services. The project will Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 expand the OTG NSD service area to include Pacific Operational Sustainability 9.25 10 Beach and Bay Park. Operating funds have been FY14 $100,863 $100,863 Innovation 9.00 10 requested. Project Budget 14.50 15 Non-Traditional Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10%

24 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.00 15 On the Go : Eastern San Diego (OTG ESD) provides Coordination and Program Jewish Family Services FY13 $95,279 $95,279 14.50 15 seniors residing in the eastern San Diego region (La Outreach - Mesa, Spring Valley, Mid-City, Grantville, Allied Gardens, Operational/ On the Go: 14.50 15 5 3 Mira Mesa, Tierrasanta, and San Carlos) with specialized 50% Implementation Plan 59 Eastern San Diego Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 transportation through its Rides and Smiles volunteer Operational Sustainability 9.25 10 driver program and Shuttles services. Operating funds FY14 $98,139 $98,139 Innovation 9.00 10 have been requested. Project Budget 14.50 15 Non-Traditional Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Full Access and Coordination and Program purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $40,000 $40,000 13.38 15 Coordinated Outreach demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service Operational/ Transportation (FACT)- 13.13 15 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will Implementation Plan 6 6 Vehicle Fleet 20% 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 Expansion Minivan #1 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Coordination and Program 13.38 15 purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $40,000 $40,000 Outreach FACT-Vehicle Fleet demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service Operational/ 13.13 15 Expansion Minivan #2 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will Implementation Plan 7 6 20% 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Coordination and Program 13.38 15 purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $40,000 $40,000 Outreach FACT- Vehicle Fleet Operational/ demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service 13.13 15 Expansion Minivan #3 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will Implementation Plan 8 6 20% 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10%

25 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Coordination and Program 13.38 15 purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $0 $0 Outreach FACT- Vehicle Fleet demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service Operational/ 13.13 15 Expansion Minivan #4 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will Implementation Plan 9 6 20% 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $30,000 $30,000 Innovation 9.00 10 Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Coordination and Program 13.38 15 purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $0 $0 Outreach FACT - Vehicle Fleet demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service Operational/ 13.13 15 Expansion Minivan #5 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will 10 6 20% Implementation Plan 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $30,000 $30,000 Innovation 9.00 10 Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Coordination and Program 13.38 15 purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $0 $0 Outreach FACT- Vehicle Fleet demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service Operational/ 13.13 15 Expansion Minivan #6 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will Implementation Plan 11 6 20% 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $30,000 $30,000 Innovation 9.00 10 requested. Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Vehicle Fleet Expansion project will support the Coordination and Program 13.38 15 purchasing of accessible vehicles for FACT to provide FY13 $0 $0 Outreach FACT-Vehicle Fleet demand-response, curb-to-curb transportation service Operational/ 13.13 15 Expansion Minivan #7 for non-emergency medical appointments. FACT will 12 6 20% Implementation Plan 67 lease grant-funded vehicles to third-party contractors at Program Effectiveness 18.75 20 no cost in return for the contractors providing free Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 medical trips for FACT. Capital funds have been FY14 $30,000 $30,000 Innovation 9.00 10 Traditional requested. Project Budget 14.00 15 Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10%

26 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.50 15 Coordination and Program 13.50 15 FY13 $40,860 $40,860 St. Madeleine Sophie's SMSC provides transportation to adults with Outreach Operational/ Center (SMSC) - developmental disabilities (ages 22 - 70+) to vocational 14.50 15 Implementation Plan 13 13 Large Bus #1 training and paid work. SMSC is seeking paratransit 20% 79 Program Effectiveness 19.25 20 vehicles to support an expansion of services to their Operational Sustainability 9.00 10 growing enrollment. Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Traditional Project Budget 14.75 15 Performance Adjustment -3.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.50 15 Coordination and Program 13.50 15 SMSC provides transportation to adults with FY13 $40,860 $40,860 Outreach St. Madeleine Sophie's Operational/ developmental disabilities (ages 22 - 70+) to vocational 14.50 15 Center- Large Bus #2 14 13 training and paid work. SMSC is seeking paratransit 20% Implementation Plan 79 Program Effectiveness 19.25 20 vehicles to support an expansion of services to their Operational Sustainability 9.00 10 growing enrollment. Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Traditional Project Budget 14.75 15 Performance Adjustment -3.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 The Medical and Dialysis Transportation for Seniors & Coordination and Program 13.38 15 FACT - Medical and Disabled project will subsidize the costs of non- FY13 $180,000 $180,000 Outreach Dialysis emergency medical trips. RideFACT, a transportation Operational/ 14.25 15 Transportation for service for seniors and persons with disabilities, is Implementation Plan 15 15 50% 85 Seniors & Disabled available in all 18 cities in San Diego County. RideFACT is Program Effectiveness 17.63 20 a safety-net travel option available for those who do not Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 have any other options. Operating funds have been FY14 $180,000 $180,000 Innovation 9.25 10 Project Budget 13.50 15 Non-Traditional requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.25 15 San Ysidro Health Coordination and Program Center (SYHC) - 13.50 15 TOP-HS is designed to provide demand-response FY13 $31,600 $31,600 Outreach Transportation Operational/ transportation services for registered SYHC patients. 14.50 15 Operations Program 16 16 Services are provided using in-house resources. The 20% Implementation Plan 90 Program Effectiveness 19.00 20 Healthy Steps (TOP- grant request is to expand their existing fleet of four Operational Sustainability 8.88 10 HS): Minivan #1 vehicles. Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Traditional Project Budget 14.00 15 Performance Adjustment -2.0% +2% -> -10%

27 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.25 15 Coordination and Program 13.50 15 TOP-HS is designed to provide demand-response FY13 $31,600 $31,600 Outreach SYHC - TOP-HS: Operational/ transportation services for registered SYHC patients. 14.50 15 Minivan #2 Implementation Plan 17 16 Services are provided using in-house resources. The 20% 90 Program Effectiveness 19.00 20 grant request is to expand their existing fleet of four Operational Sustainability 8.88 10 vehicles. Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 9.00 10 Project Budget 14.00 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment -2.0% +2% -> -10% Home of Guiding Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program Hands (HGH)- 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $28,800 $28,800 Community Outreach persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult Operational/ Integration and 12.50 15 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious Implementation Plan 18 18 Mobilization Program: 20% 93 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Program Effectiveness 18.38 20 GPS, Software, and requests funds for GPS technology, software, and radios Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 Radios to support the expansion of their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 Traditional funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 19 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 93 Program Effectiveness 18.38 20 Large Bus #1 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 20 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 93 Large Bus #2 Program Effectiveness 18.38 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

28 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $56,000 $56,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 21 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 93 Program Effectiveness 18.40 20 Large Bus #3 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $40,000 $40,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 20.00 15 Mobilization Program: 22 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 93 Program Effectiveness 10.88 20 Minivan #1 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $40,000 $40,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 23 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 93 Program Effectiveness 18.38 20 Minivan #2 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $40,000 $40,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 24 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 93 Minivan #3 Program Effectiveness 18.38 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

29 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 25 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 93 Program Effectiveness 18.40 20 Minivan #4 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $40,000 $40,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 26 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 93 Program Effectiveness 18.40 20 Minivan #5 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $40,000 $40,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 27 18 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 93 Minivan #6 Program Effectiveness 18.40 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $28,000 $28,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.88 15 This project will help to support FACT's staff and Coordination and Program FACT - Administration 13.38 15 administrative expenses for providing the transportation FY13 $200,000 $200,000 of Medical and Outreach call center, management of the Transportation Operational/ Dialysis 14.00 15 Brokerage, and operating non-emergency medical and Implementation Plan 28 28 Transportation for 20% 126 dialysis transportation for seniors and disabled clients. Program Effectiveness 15.63 20 Seniors & Disabled FACT provides these services to benefit seniors and Operational Sustainability 8.50 10 individuals with disabilities in San Diego County. Mobility FY14 $200,000 $200,000 Innovation 9.25 10 Project Budget 11.38 15 Traditional Management funds have been requested. Performance Adjustment 1.5% +2% -> -10%

30 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 12.50 15 Rides4Neighbors provides transportation by volunteer Coordination and Program 13.13 15 drivers using their own vehicles to meet the essential FY13 $75,000 $75,000 Outreach City of La Mesa- needs of eligible seniors and/or disabled adults Operational/ 14.50 15 Rides4Neighbors throughout East County. Rides4Neighbors also includes Implementation Plan 29 29 50% 131 taxicab vouchers, accessible vans, a shuttle program, taxi Program Effectiveness 16.75 20 script discounts, and an annual Senior Expo, which Operational Sustainability 8.25 10 provides transportation resources and education for FY14 $75,000 $75,000 Innovation 9.25 10 seniors. Operating funds have been requested. Project Budget 14.00 15 Non-Traditional Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $56,000 $56,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 30 30 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 137 Program Effectiveness 17.40 20 Large Bus #4 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $56,000 $56,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 31 30 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 137 Program Effectiveness 17.40 20 Large Bus #5 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $56,000 $56,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: 32 30 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% Implementation Plan 137 Program Effectiveness 17.40 20 Large Bus #6 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Traditional Project Budget 13.13 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

31 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable Coordination and Program HGH -Community 12.50 15 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile FY13 $56,000 $56,000 Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 33 30 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 137 Large Bus #7 Program Effectiveness 17.40 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable 12.50 15 HGH -Community FY13 $0 $0 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 34 30 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 137 Large Bus #8 Program Effectiveness 17.40 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable 12.50 15 HGH -Community FY13 $0 $0 Outreach transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 35 30 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 137 Large Bus #9 Program Effectiveness 17.40 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% This project seeks to support SMSC's transportation Goals and Objectives 14.50 15 Coordination and Program program through mileage reimbursement funds. The 13.50 15 FY13 $191,927 $191,927 St. Madeleine Sophie's program provides adults with developmental disabilities Outreach Operational/ Center - Mileage with transportation to SMSC's vocational training 14.25 15 Implementation Plan 36 36 Reimbursement centers and paid work. Operating funds have been 50% 142 Program Effectiveness 17.50 20 requested. This project is the lowest scoring non- Operational Sustainability 9.00 10 traditional project. To comply with FTA requirements to FY14 $191,927 $180,738 Innovation 9.00 10 give priority to traditional projects, a partial award is Project Budget 14.25 15 Non-Traditional recommended for the second year of funding. Performance Adjustment -3.0% +2% -> -10%

32 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $41,666 $41,666 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Implementation Plan 37 37 20% 153 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 19.00 20 Large Bus #1 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable 12.50 15 HGH -Community FY13 $56,000 $56,000 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 38 38 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 163 Large Bus #10 Program Effectiveness 16.38 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable 12.50 15 HGH -Community FY13 $0 $0 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 39 38 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 163 Large Bus #11 Program Effectiveness 16.38 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable 12.50 15 HGH -Community FY13 $0 $0 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 40 38 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 163 Large Bus #12 Program Effectiveness 16.38 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

33 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program HGH's transportation program provides safe, reliable 12.50 15 HGH -Community FY13 $0 $0 transportation to approximately 300 medically fragile Outreach Integration and Operational/ persons with developmental disabilities to/from adult 12.50 15 Mobilization Program: Implementation Plan 41 38 day centers; schools; recreational, social, and religious 20% 163 Large Bus #13 Program Effectiveness 16.38 20 events; and non-emergency medical appointments. HGH Operational Sustainability 8.00 10 requests funds to expand their vehicle fleet. Capital FY14 $56,000 $56,000 Innovation 7.13 10 funds have been requested. Project Budget 13.13 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $32,152 $32,152 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Implementation Plan 42 42 20% 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Minivan #1 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $32,152 $32,152 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Implementation Plan 4243 20% 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Minivan #2 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $32,152 $32,152 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Implementation Plan 44 42 20% 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Minivan #3 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $32,152 $13,648 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Implementation Plan 45 42 20% 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Minivan #4 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

34 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 San Diego MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program Metropolitan Transit 14.13 15 services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach System (MTS) Access from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Vehicle Fleet Operational/ 46 service operates in full compliance with the American's 14.50 15 49 Replacement 20% Implementation Plan 190 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Expansion: Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 Small Bus #1 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $55,556 Innovation 6.75 10 vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 47 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 49 20% 190 Small Bus #2 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $55,556 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 48 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 49 20% 190 Small Bus #3 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $55,556 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 49 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 49 20% 190 Small Bus #4 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $55,556 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10%

35 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 50 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 49 20% 190 Small Bus #5 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $55,556 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 51 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 49 20% 190 Small Bus #6 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $49,729 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Funded Project Subtotals: $3,817,361** $3,781,841**

Projects Not Recommended For Funding

Section Average Scores Final Requested Recommended Req'd Line ID Project Project Description FY Total Rank Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score

Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $32,152 $0 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Im 52 42 20% plementation Plan 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Minivan #5 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

36 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $41,666 $0 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are 53 42 20% Implementation Plan 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Large Bus #2 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 14.25 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $41,666 $0 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are Implementation Plan 54 42 20% 165 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 17.00 20 Large Bus #3 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 55 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #7 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 56 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #8 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10%

37 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 57 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #9 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 4958 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #10 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 59 49 20% 190 Small Bus #11 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 60 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #12 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10%

38 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 61 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #13 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 62 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #14 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $55,556 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 63 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #15 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 4964 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #16 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10%

39 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's Implementation Plan 65 49 20% 190 Small Bus #17 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 12.63 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.13 15 MTS Access provides origin-to-destination transportation Coordination and Program 14.13 15 MTS Access Vehicle services to persons with disabilities that prevent them FY13 $0 $0 Outreach Fleet Replacement from utilizing traditional public transportation. This Operational/ 14.50 15 Expansion: service operates in full compliance with the American's 66 49 20% Implementation Plan 190 Small Bus #18 with Disabilities Act, and transports prequalified clients Program Effectiveness 11.50 20 to locations within 3/4-mile of any active fixed bus or Operational Sustainability 8.75 10 trolley route. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $55,556 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional vehicle procurement. Project Budget 12.63 15 Performance Adjustment 0.5% +2% -> -10% PVA seeks to provide a Dial-a-Ride service for veterans Goals and Objectives 10.75 15 Coordination and Program Paralyzed Veterans of and others with spinal cord injury or dysfunction, who 13.25 15 America (PVA) are wheelchair dependent or have a semi-ambulatory FY13 $0 $0 Outreach capacity, that cannot effectively use public Operational/ Cal Diego Chapter 14.50 15 Wheelchair Accessible transportation. Wheelchair accessible transportation Implementation Plan 67 67 20% 195 Dial-A-Ride Program: services are important in order for those that PVA serves Program Effectiveness 13.75 20 to maintain a high quality of life by fulfilling basic daily Minivan Operational Sustainability 10.00 10 needs and providing access to healthcare, education, FY14 $40,000 $0 Innovation 7.50 10 and work. Capital funds have been requested for vehicle Project Budget 13.25 15 Traditional procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 City Link provides excellent, reliable and safe Coordination and Program 12.75 15 The City Link transportation services to seniors and developmentally FY13 $37,600 $0 Outreach Foundation disabled residents of San Diego County. City Link Operational/ 13.63 15 (City Link) partners with five local agencies, including San Ysidro 68 68 20% Implementation Plan 196 Minivan #1 Health Center. City Link seeks to expand their vehicle Program Effectiveness 17.75 20 fleet providing non-emergency medical trips to San Operational Sustainability 5.50 10 Ysidro Health Care's new senior health center. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.50 10 Traditional funds have been requested. Project Budget 12.50 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

40 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 City Link provides excellent, reliable and safe Coordination and Program 12.75 15 transportation services to seniors and developmentally FY13 $37,600 $0 Outreach City Link- disabled residents of San Diego County. City Link Operational/ 13.63 15 Minivan #2 partners with five local agencies, including San Ysidro 69 68 20% Implementation Plan 196 Health Center. City Link seeks to expand their vehicle Program Effectiveness 17.75 20 fleet providing non-emergency medical trips to San Operational Sustainability 5.50 10 Ysidro Health Care's new senior health center. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.50 10 Traditional funds have been requested. Project Budget 12.50 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program 12.75 15 City Link requests funds to purchase video cameras to FY13 $33,852 $0 Outreach City Link - collect and analyze bus data from daily transports. City Operational/ 13.63 15 Video Cameras Link seeks to develop a county-wide performance Implementation Plan 70 70 20% 212 measure of all City Link vehicles in operation. These Program Effectiveness 16.75 20 video cameras will help to create the most cost-efficient Operational Sustainability 5.50 10 and effective routes. Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.50 10 Project Budget 12.50 15 Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 Coordination and Program 12.75 15 City Link requests funds to purchase GPS software that FY13 $107,340 $0 Outreach City Link - Operational/ will enable City Link to collect route data including real- 13.63 15 GPS Software 71 70 time bus location, mileage, and speed. Access to this 20% Implementation Plan 212 Program Effectiveness 16.75 20 data will allow City Link to create the most cost-effective Operational Sustainability 5.50 10 and efficient routes. Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.50 10 Traditional Project Budget 12.50 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 14.25 15 Renewing Life - Renewing Life is proposing to expand its no-cost, door- Coordination and Program 12.00 15 Seniors and to-door transportation service for seniors and individuals FY13 $70,000 $0 Outreach Individuals with with disabilities in South County. This program provides Operational/ 13.50 15 Disabilities safe and friendly service for non-emergency medical, 72 72 50% Implementation Plan 215 Transportation legal, and financial trips to senior residents of Town Program Effectiveness 15.38 20 Program Center Manor, Harvest Ridge, Congregational Towers, Operational Sustainability 6.50 10 and Kimball Towers. Operating funds have been FY14 $70,000 $0 Innovation 8.25 10 Non-Traditional requested. Project Budget 11.50 15 Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10%

41 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 12.38 15 Sharp Healthcare Sharp Health Care has a system level Patient Coordination and Program 12.75 15 Foundation - Transportation Services Department which provides FY13 $41,665 $0 Outreach Healthcare Patient patients with free non-emergency rides for out-patient Operational/ 14.50 15 Transportation and medical appointments. All clients that are served are 73 73 20% Implementation Plan 222 Services: either seniors, those with disabilities, or those with a Program Effectiveness 16.00 20 Large Bus #4 mental illness. The service is door-to-door and aided by Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 volunteer drivers. Capital funds have been requested for FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Project Budget 14.25 15 Traditional vehicle procurement. Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 City Link provides excellent, reliable and safe Coordination and Program 12.75 15 transportation services to seniors and developmentally FY13 $37,600 $0 Outreach City Link- disabled residents of San Diego County. City Link Operational/ 13.63 15 Minivan #3 partners with five local agencies, including San Ysidro 74 74 20% Implementation Plan 225 Health Center. City Link seeks to expand their vehicle Program Effectiveness 15.75 20 fleet providing non-emergency medical trips to San Operational Sustainability 5.50 10 Ysidro Health Care's new senior health center. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.50 10 Traditional funds have been requested. Project Budget 12.50 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.25 15 Coordination and Program 13.50 15 San Ysidro Health TOP ADHC is designed to provide fixed route FY13 $100,000 $0 Outreach Center - TOP Adult transportation services for individuals receiving care from Operational/ 14.00 15 Day Health Center SYHC's Adult Day Health Center. TOP-ADHC hopes to Implementation Plan 75 75 50% 227 (TOP-ADHC) expand to a new Senior Health Center and PACE center Program Effectiveness 12.50 20 for the elderly in 2014-2015. Operating funds have been Operational Sustainability 7.50 10 requested. FY14 $100,000 $0 Innovation 8.50 10 Project Budget 10.50 15 Non-Traditional Performance Adjustment -2.0% +2% -> -10% Renewing Life is proposing to expand its no-cost door-to- Goals and Objectives 14.25 15 Coordination and Program door transportation service to provide an increase in 12.00 15 FY13 $48,000 $0 Renewing Life - annual low-income, disabled, and senior trips in the Outreach Operational/ Vehicle Procurement: South County. Through the vehicle procurement 13.50 15 Implementation Plan 76 76 Minivan Renewing Life hopes to increase in providing safe and 20% 228 Program Effectiveness 11.00 20 friendly service for non-emergency medical, legal, and Operational Sustainability 8.25 10 financial trips to seniors in Town Center Manor, Harvest FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 8.00 10 Ridge, Congregational Towers, and Kimball Towers. Project Budget 13.75 15 Traditional Capital funds have been requested. Performance Adjustment 1.0% +2% -> -10%

42 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 13.50 15 City Link provides excellent, reliable and safe Coordination and Program 12.75 15 transportation services to seniors and developmentally FY13 $37,600 $0 Outreach City Link- disabled residents of San Diego County. City Link Operational/ 13.63 15 Minivan #4 partners with five local agencies, including San Ysidro 77 77 20% Implementation Plan 248 Health Center. City Link seeks to expand their vehicle Program Effectiveness 13.75 20 fleet providing non-emergency medical trips to San Operational Sustainability 5.50 10 Ysidro Health Care's new senior health center. Capital FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.50 10 Traditional funds have been requested. Project Budget 12.50 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 13.25 15 TOP-GEN is designed to provide demand-response Coordination and Program 13.50 15 transportation services for registered SYHC patients who FY13 $85,000 $0 San Ysidro Health Outreach have appointments for specialty care and other health Operational/ Center - TOP General 14.25 15 services that are outside of SYHC's delivery service Implementation Plan 78 78 (TOP-GEN) 50% 249 network. TOP-GEN also provides scheduled social Program Effectiveness 10.63 20 outings to public libraries, parks, stores, etc. TOP-GEN Operational Sustainability 7.75 10 transportation services are provided by City Link. FY14 $85,000 $0 Innovation 8.75 10 Non-Traditional Operating funds have been requested. Project Budget 10.75 15 Performance Adjustment -2.0% +2% -> -10% Goals and Objectives 12.25 15 BAME Renaissance Coordination and Program Community 10.63 15 Outreach Development FY13 $41,388 $0 BAME CDC's CommConnect program provides Operational/ Corporation (BAME 13.00 15 transportation to seniors and individuals with disabilities Implementation Plan CDC) - Community in the greater Logan Heights community. BAME CDC 79 79 20% Program Effectiveness 10.00 20 289 Connections seeks to expand its service capacity through (CommConnect) procurement of a second wheelchair accessible vehicle. Operational Sustainability 7.25 10 Program Capital funds have been requested. FY14 $0 $0 Innovation 6.75 10 Traditional Project Budget 9.75 15 Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10%

43 Section 5310 Project Descriptions and Rankings Final Requested Recommended Req'd Section Average Scores Total Line ID Project Project Description FY Rank Grant $ Grant $ Match Section Avg. Score Max. Score Rank* Goals and Objectives 10.75 15 Coordination and Program Circulate San Diego seeks to provide travel training to 7.00 15 FY13 $0 $0 Circulate San Diego - seniors and individuals with disabilities to help them Outreach Operational/ Travel Training and overcome the psychological barriers to fixed route 12.00 15 Implementation Plan 80 80 Safe Routes to Transit transit. Circulate San Diego also seeks to identify 50% 296 Program Effectiveness 8.50 20 improvements to bus stops and the paths of travel for Operational Sustainability 4.25 10 passengers between their origin/destinations and the FY14 $102,868 $0 Innovation 6.25 10 bus stop. Operating funds have been requested. Project Budget 8.75 15 Non-Traditional Performance Adjustment N/A +2% -> -10% Non-Funded Project Subtotals: $1,857,662** $0 Note: * - The projects are ranked based on the “Total Rank.“ The total rank is calculated by using each evaluator’s scores to determine their individual rankings for the project. For an individual evaluator, the project they score the highest would get one point towards the total rank from that evaluator. The second highest score that evaluator gave would get two points, and so on. The different evaluator’s rankings are then added up for each project. The project with the lowest total rank score ranks the highest overall.

** - Totals may not add up due to rounding.

44

AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-17A

BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – INFORMATION

STATE CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAMS File Number 7300400

Introduction

In 2014, the California Legislature created the first investment plan for cap-and-trade auction revenues. Approximately $872 million was authorized in the FY 2014-15 state budget for various transit, sustainable communities, and low-carbon transportation programs to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Governor Brown’s FY 2015-16 Proposed Budget includes $1 billion for the same purposes. Attachment 1 includes a description of each of these programs.

Discussion

The transit and transportation-related funding components of the cap-and-trade investment plan include the following programs.

Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

• Created to fund capital improvements and operational investments that will modernize California’s transit systems and intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems to reduce GHG emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled throughout California. This program includes a statewide requirement that at least 25 percent of these funds benefit disadvantaged communities (additional information on how these communities are defined in the context of the Cap-and-Trade Program is provided at the end of this report).

• Funding Available: $25 million (FY 2014-15); $100 million (proposed FY 2015-16)

• Status: Final guidelines for this program were released on February 6, 2015. The call for projects was released on February 9, 2015, and project applications are due on April 10, 2015. The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve the submission of applications for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit and Del Lago Parking Access Control projects.

Low Carbon Transit Operations Program

• A formula-funded program to provide operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce GHG emissions and improve mobility, including new or expanded bus and rail services. This program includes a requirement that, for certain transit agencies, at least 50 percent of the total funding received be expended on projects or services that benefit disadvantaged communities.

• Funding Available: $25 million (FY 2014-15); $50 million (proposed FY 2015-16) - allocations are based on the ratio of the population of the area under a transit agency’s jurisdiction to the total population of the state, and the ratio of the revenue of the transit operator’s jurisdiction to the total revenue of all operators in the state.

• Status: This program includes two cycles for transit agencies in which to participate. Transit agencies participating in the first cycle were required to submit expenditure proposals by February 2, 2015, and those in the second cycle by April 15, 2015.

Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program

• Developed to reduce GHG emissions through projects that implement land-use, housing, transportation, and agricultural land preservation practices to support infill and compact development. This program includes a statewide programmatic requirement that 50 percent of program expenditures benefit disadvantaged communities.

• Funding Available: $130 million (FY 2014-15); $200 million (proposed FY 2015-16)

• Status: The notice of available funding was released on January 30, 2015. Concept proposals were due on February 19, 2015. Select applicants will be invited by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to submit a full application on March 11, 2015, and full applications will be due April 15, 2015. The Transportation Committee approved the submission of concept proposals for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit and Inland Rail Trail projects at its February 6, 2015, meeting and recommends that the Board of Directors approve the submission of full applications for these projects, pending invitation by the HCD.

Low Carbon Transportation

• An allocation for the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to accelerate the transition to low carbon freight and passenger transportation. These expenditures also will provide incentives for the pre-commercial demonstration of advanced freight technology to move cargo in California. ARB is targeting 50 percent of this funding to projects that benefit disadvantaged communities, with a significant portion of these funds spent on projects based in those communities.

• Funding Available: $200 million (FY 2014-15); $200 million (proposed FY 2015-16)

• Status: This program includes rebates for zero-emission cars and vouchers for hybrid and zero- emission trucks and buses as well as several smaller pilot programs that SANDAG is monitoring for potential funding opportunities. Solicitations for the various pilot programs are expected to be released in February and March 2015.

High-Speed Rail

• Authorized for the California High-Speed Rail Authority to construct the initial construction segment in the Central Valley and further environmental and design work on the statewide system. This appropriation does not include a statutory spending requirement for projects benefiting disadvantaged communities.

• Funding Available: $250 million (FY 2014-15); $250 million (proposed FY 2015-16)

2

• Status: On January 6, 2015, Governor Brown led a ceremony to commemorate the beginning of construction on the High-Speed Rail Program to connect northern and southern California via the Central Valley.

Disadvantaged Communities

Senate Bill 535 (De Leon, 2012) directs the Secretary for Environmental Protection at the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to identify disadvantaged communities. This identification must be based on geographic, socioeconomic, public health, and environmental hazard criteria (Health and Safety Code Section 37911). Utilizing a tool called CalEnviroscreen 2.0, CalEPA has identified the census tracts in California with the top 25 percent of scores as disadvantaged communities. Additional information regarding the identified disadvantaged communities, including those in San Diego County and throughout the state, can be found at http://www.calepa.ca.gov/EnvJustice/GHGInvest/.

Next Steps

Staff will continue to monitor and update the Board of Directors as these programs develop.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachment: 1. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Programs

Key Staff Contact: Robyn Wapner, (619) 699-1994, [email protected]

3 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Programs Attachment 1 % of 2014‐15 Potential Projects Identified by 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 Funds Benefitting Appropriations Implementing Agencies (M) (M) (%) Disadvantaged Communities High Speed Rail (HSRA) Construction of the initial construction segment in the Central Valley and further Planning/Design $59 environmental and design work on the statewide system. The Budget also provides an ongoing commitment that allows for the advancement of the project on multiple Right‐of‐way acquisition of Initial Operating Segment 25% 0‐25% segments concurrently, which yields cost savings and creates an opportunity for $191 earlier potential private sector investment. These investments in the high‐speed rail Construction of Initial Operating system will alleviate pressure on California’s current transportation network and will Segment provide both environmental and economic benefits. Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (CalSTA) Connectivity to existing/future rail Competitive grant program for rail and bus transit operators for capital systems by adding new rail improvements to integrate state and local rail and other transit systems, including cars/engines Increase service and reliability of 25% those located in disadvantaged communities, and those that provide connectivity to $25 10% the high‐speed rail system. The Transportation Agency will prepare a list of projects intercity and commuter rail (in statute) recommended for funding, to be submitted to the California Transportation systems Encourage multi‐modal transit via Commission for programming and allocation. integrated ticketing / scheduling Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (Caltrans to local agencies) New/expanded bus or rail services Support new or expanded bus and rail services, with an emphasis on disadvantaged or expanded intermodal transit facilities 50% communities. Expenditures are required to result in an increase in transit ridership $25 5% and a decrease in GHG emissions. Service or facility improvements, (in statute) e.g. equipment, fueling, and maintenance Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (SGC and member agencies) Intermodal affordable housing Implementation of sustainable communities strategies required by SB 375, and to Transit capital projects provide similar support to other areas with GHG reduction policies, but not subject to SB 375 requirements. Projects that benefit disadvantaged communities will be Active transportation/complete 50% given priority. Also, projects will reduce GHG emissions by increasing transit streets $130 20% ridership, active transportation (walking/biking), affordable housing near transit Transit‐oriented development (in statute) stations, preservation of agricultural land, and local planning that promotes infill Agricultural land preservation development and reduces the number of vehicle miles traveled. Local planning and implementation Low Carbon Transportation (ARB) Passenger ZEV rebates Accelerate the transition to low carbon freight and passenger transportation, with a priority for disadvantaged communities. This investment will also support the Heavy duty hybrid/ZEV trucks and Administration’s goal to deploy 1.5 million zero‐emission vehicles in California by buses 2025. ARB administers existing programs that provide rebates for zero‐emission cars $30 $200 50% and vouchers for hybrid and zero‐emission trucks and buses. These expenditures will Freight demonstration projects respond to increasing demand for these incentives, as well as provide incentives for Pilot programs (car sharing, the pre‐commercial demonstration of advanced freight technology to move cargo in financing, etc.) in disadvantaged California, which will benefit communities near freight hubs. communities 9/29/2014 SUMMARY DEVELOPED BY THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15-02-17B BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ACTION REQUESTED – APPROVE

PROPOSED CAP-AND-TRADE PROJECT SUBMITTALS File Number 7300400

Introduction Recommendation The state cap-and-trade investment plan includes several transit and transportation-related programs, The Transportation Committee recommends totaling about $620 million in available funding for that the Board of Directors: (1) approve the FY 2014-2015. SANDAG is eligible to compete for proposed full application submittals for the funding under the Affordable Housing and Affordable Housing and Sustainable Sustainable Communities (AHSC), Transit and Intercity Communities Program, pending invitation by Rail Capital (TIRC), and Low Carbon Transportation the Department of Housing and Community programs. The AHSC and TIRC programs both have Development; and (2) approve the proposed released their calls for projects; the Low Carbon project submittals for the Transit and Transportation Program is expected to release Intercity Rail Capital Program. solicitations for its funding over the next few months.

Discussion

Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities

The AHSC Program will provide grants to projects that are expected to achieve greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions and benefit disadvantaged communities through increasing accessibility of affordable housing, employment centers, and key destinations via low-carbon transportation, resulting in fewer vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through shortened vehicle trip length or mode shift.

Approximately $120 million statewide is available for the AHSC Program in FY 2014-2015. It is statutorily required that at least 50 percent of AHSC Program funds benefit disadvantaged communities and at least 50 percent be expended for affordable housing.

The AHSC Program is being administered by the Strategic Growth Council (SGC), which will allocate the funding through a competitive process. The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) will oversee the transportation, housing, and infrastructure component of the program.

The SGC released a Notice of Funding Availability Process for the AHSC Program on January 30, 2015. Applicants were required to submit concept proposals by February 19, 2015. Based on a ranking of concept proposals, HCD will then notify applicants whether or not they are

invited to submit full applications. Upon invitation, full applications will be due to the HCD on April 15, 2015.

Additional information regarding this program can be found in the adopted guidelines at http://sgc.ca.gov/docs/AHSC-FINAL_GUIDELINES.pdf.

Scoring and Selection Criteria

Attachment 1 outlines the AHSC Program scoring elements and criteria that will be used by the SGC to evaluate full applications. In general, 55 percent of a project’s total score will be based on GHG reduction, 30 percent on policy objectives, and 15 percent on feasibility and readiness.

The program requires that:

• other committed funds are not being supplanted by AHSC Program funds

• construction of the project has not commenced as of the application deadline

• all necessary environmental clearances, including those required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and if applicable, the National Environmental Policy Act, have been completed and all applicable time periods for filing appeals or lawsuits have lapsed

• all necessary discretionary local land use approvals, excluding design review, have been granted

Metropolitan Planning Organization Role

Similar to the Active Transportation Program, SANDAG is both an eligible applicant to the AHSC Program and has an advisory role in the review process.

In the first phase of the application process, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are asked to review concept applications for consistency with the regional Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). SANDAG plans to review concept applications for consistency with the 2050 Regional Transportation Plan and its Sustainable Communities Strategy (2050 RTP/SCS) using the relevant local general plans and the Series 13 Regional Growth Forecast.

For the second phase, which calls for MPOs to review full applications, SANDAG intends to develop a process, subject to approval by the Board of Directors, which will provide a level playing field for SANDAG proposals being reviewed at the same time as other eligible applicant proposals.

Proposed SANDAG Project Submittals

At its February 6, 2015, meeting, the Transportation Committee reviewed and approved the submission of concept proposals by SANDAG for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (South Bay BRT) and Inland Rail Trail projects under the AHSC Program, and recommended that the Board of Directors approve the submission of full applications for these projects, pending invitation by the HCD. A summary of the proposed project submittals is provided below:

South Bay BRT: The South Bay BRT is a TransNet Early Action Project (EAP) that will provide BRT service between the Otay Mesa Border Crossing and Downtown San Diego via Eastern Chula Vista

2 (Attachment 2). The environmental documents for this project were completed in July 2013, and construction is expected to begin in fall 2015. The estimated grant request is $7 million and will support the construction of the final segment from Chula Vista to the new Intermodal Transportation Center at Otay Mesa.

Inland Rail Trail: The Inland Rail Trail is a TransNet EAP Project that will construct 21 miles of Class I bicycle facility within the cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, and Escondido as well as within a portion of the unincorporated County of San Diego (Attachment 3). The environmental documents for this project were completed in September 2013, and final design is scheduled for completion in June 2015. Construction is scheduled to begin in late 2015. The estimated grant request is $8 million and will support the construction of segments in the County of San Diego, City of Vista, and a small segment in the City of Oceanside.

Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

The TIRC Program was created to fund capital improvements and operational investments that will modernize transit systems and intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems to reduce GHG emissions by reducing VMT throughout California.

The objectives of the TIRC Program are to:

• reduce GHG emissions

• expand and improve rail service to increase ridership

• integrate the rail service of the state’s various rail operations, including integration with the High-Speed Rail system

• improve safety

The TIRC Program is being administered by the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA). The call for projects was released on February 9, 2015, and project applications are due to the Department of Transportation on April 10, 2015.

Available Funding

There is approximately $125 million of funding available statewide under the TIRC Program. It is statutorily required that at least 25 percent of TIRC funds support projects that provide a direct, meaningful, and assured benefit to disadvantaged communities.

SANDAG is allowed to submit one major capital project ($3 - $41.1 million or greater) and one smaller scale operational or integration effort, minor capital project, or demonstration project (less than $3 million).

Scoring and Selection Criteria

CalSTA intends to fund a small number of transformational projects that improve the statewide transportation network and will give priority to projects that fund construction or implementation. In particular, CalSTA is seeking projects that link key destinations and improve accessibility to

3 economic opportunities. CalSTA also will make funding available for demonstration projects that are smaller scale efforts with great potential to be expanded.

Projects will be evaluated based on how well a project meets the objectives of the program (as outlined above) and the extent to which the project supports SCS implementation, benefits to disadvantaged communities, and projects readiness and reasonableness.

Additional information regarding this program can be found in the adopted guidelines at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/Docs-Pdfs/Cap&Trade/adopted.tircp.guidelines_feb2015.pdf.

Proposed SANDAG Project Submittals

At its February 20, 2015, meeting, the Transportation Committee voted to recommend that the Board of Directors approve the submission of applications for the Del Lago Parking Access Control and South Bay BRT projects under the TIRC Program.

Del Lago Parking Access Control: Funding to study parking access control at the Del Lago Rapid station was included in the FY 2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (CIP No. 1201516). The TIRC Program offers an opportunity to fund implementation of a pilot project, based on this study, to increase parking capacity for transit users at the Del Lago Transit Station by utilizing a software program that integrates with existing technology (such as Compass Card or transponders) in order to identify authorized users of the parking lot. The CEQA exemption for this project was completed in July 2014, and construction is expected to begin in September 2016. The estimated grant request under the TIRC Program is $1.3 million (demonstration project).

The estimated grant request for the South Bay BRT Project under the TIRC Program is $7 million (major capital project).

Other Regional Submissions 1

The North County Transit District (NCTD) intends to submit the San Onofre to Pulgas Double Track Phase 2 as its major capital project. This project would construct 1.6 miles of second main track in the Camp Pendleton area of the Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor. The estimated grant request is $25 million.

As its minor project, NCTD intends to submit the San Marcos Civic Center Green Parking Lot/Mobility Hub. This project will create an approximately one acre transit parking facility with mobility hub features along the Escondido Subdivision (SPRINTER) in San Marcos. The estimated grant request is $2.9 million.

The Metropolitan Transit System is reviewing potential projects and staff will update the Board of Directors once more information becomes available.

Next Steps

Based on approval by the Board of Directors, SANDAG will submit full applications for the South Bay BRT and Inland Rail Trail projects, pending invitation from the HCD, under the AHSC Program.

1 Neither operator intends to submit applications under the AHSC Program for FY 2014-2015.

4 SANDAG staff will continue to update the Regional Planning and Transportation Committees and the Board of Directors regarding the review of AHSC concept proposals, and intends to present a proposed approach for the evaluation of full applications for recommendation and approval in March 2015.

Pending Board approval, SANDAG also will submit applications for the South Bay BRT and Del Lago Parking Access Control projects under the TIRC Program.

GARY L. GALLEGOS Executive Director

Attachments: 1. FY 2014-2015 AHSC Program Scoring Elements and Criteria 2. South Bay BRT Route 3. Inland Rail Trail

Key Staff Contact: Robyn Wapner, (619) 699-1994, [email protected]

5 Attachment 1

AHSC Scoring Elements and Criteria

GHG Reduction - 55% of total score

•Estimated GHG emissions reductions per GGRF dollar. GHG emissions reductions must be estimated using the GHG Quantification Methodology in Appendix D (55 points)

Feasibility and Readiness - 15% of total score

•Captial Project Past Performance (2 points) •Capital Project Readiness & Program Readiness, Capacity, Need and Leverage (8 points) •Capital Project Funds Leveraged (4 points) •Implementation of Planning Efforts (1 point)

Policy Objectives - 30% of total score

•Accessibility to Qualified Employment Areas (5.5 points) •Extent to which the Project Area Incorporates Walkable Corridors (5.5 points) •Extent to which the Project Area Incorporates Features which Encourage Bicycling (3 points) •Extent to which the Housing Development Serves Lower- and Moderate- Income Households (6.5 points) •Extent to which the Project Addresses Co-Benefits (6.5 points) •Anti-Displacement Strategies (1 point) •Community Engagement (2 points)

AHSC Program Guidelines January 20, 2015 6 Attachment 2 South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

The new Express Lanes, in-line Direct connectors are roadways that transit stations, and Park & Ride Alternative Route link Express Lanes on one freeway locations would accommodate to another. The I-805 South Project the proposed SANDAG South will include one convenient direct Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. connector to SR 15. This will help This rapid and reliable new maintain consistent traffic speed transit service will connect the within the Express Lanes. A direct Otay Mesa Port of Entry to connector at SR 94 is planned as downtown San Diego via part of a separate project. eastern Chula Vista. The system’s upscale, high- frequency buses will have signal priority and use dedicated lanes to ensure faster travel times and fewer stops.

HOV/Express Lanes

Express Lanes will be constructed in the center of the freeway between East Palomar Street and the I-805/SR 15 interchange. The new lanes will offer users expanded transportation choices to bypass congestion, improving travel times for carpoolers, vanpoolers, motorcycles, solo drivers using FasTrak, and Bus Rapid Transit riders.

A new Direct Access Ramp (DAR) will be constructed on East Palomar Street in Chula Vista. DARs connect surface streets directly to Express Lanes in the center median, allowing carpoolers, vanpoolers, solo drivers using FasTrak, motorcycles, and buses to enter the In-Line Transit Stations Express Lanes without having to navigate through the freeway’s general purpose New transit stations will be lanes. This will help improve travel times constructed in the center of the and reduce congestion. freeway at H Street in Chula Vista and Plaza Boulevard in National City. These stops will provide convenient access to the high-frequency SANDAG South Bay Bus Rapid Transit system and reduce travel times by eliminating the need for buses to exit the freeway.

Palomar Station

Park & Ride stations will be constructed near the in-line transit stations on Plaza Boulevard and H Street and near the proposed DAR and transit station at Palomar Street. The purpose of the stations is to provide travelers with convenient access to the Bus Rapid Transit system, and to provide carpoolers with a convenient location to leave their cars.

Revised September 17, 2013

7 Attachment 3 INLAND RAIL TRAIL

s SPRINTER STATION

s OCEANSIDE PROPOSED PROJECT = 7 MILES

s s VISTA s s s COUNTY s s FUTURE PROJECT s s COMPLETED PROJECT

N 5 ESCONDIDO s s 15 s CARLSBAD SAN MARCOS s

8 Funding Recommendations for Federal Fiscal Year 2013 and 2014 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) and FY 2016 and FY 2017 TransNet Senior Mini-Grant Programs

February 2015

Competitive Process

. Grant Programs: (1) Enhanced Mobility of Senior and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) (2) TransNet Senior Mini-Grant

. Call for Projects announced on July 25, 2014, and closed on October 24, 2014 . Project rankings reviewed by ITOC (Senior Mini- Grant only) and TC (both programs)

1 Results – Section 5310

Section 5310 FY 2013 FY 2014 Requested $3,301,985 $2,548,352 (14 applicants, 80 projects) Available $1,904,104 $1,877,738

. Funding Recommendations • 49 (out of 80) projects recommended for full funding • 44 traditional / 5 non-traditional • 3 partial awards (2 traditional / 1 non-traditional)

3

Results – Senior Mini-Grant

Senior Mini-Grant FY 2016 FY 2017

Requested $1,908,846 $2,371,646 (17 applicants, 20 projects) Available $1,611,870 $1,700,452

. Funding Recommendations: • 14 (out of 20) projects recommended for full funding • 2 partial awards

4

2 Recommendation

The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors approve: (1) the funding recommendations for the FTA Section 5310 and TransNet Senior Mini-Grant programs, in substantially the same form as Attachment 3 of this report; and (2) a contingency allocation of any remaining federal funds to the unfunded Section 5310 projects based on rankings should additional funding become available.

5

3 State Cap‐and‐Trade Programs

February 27, 2015

Cap‐and‐Trade Programs

Agency/Program Appropriations Potential Projects Identified FY 2014‐15 FY 2015‐16 by Implementing Agencies (Proposed) ($M) ($M)

. New/expanded bus or rail services or Low Carbon Transit expanded intermodal transit facilities Operations Program $25 $50 (Caltrans to local agencies) . Service or facility improvements, e.g. equipment, fueling, and maintenance

. Passenger zero emission vehicle (ZEV) rebates Low Carbon . Heavy duty hybrid/ZEV trucks and buses $200 $200 Transportation . Freight demonstration projects (ARB) . Pilot programs in disadvantaged communities

. Planning/design High Speed Rail . $250 $250 Right‐of‐way acquisition of (HSRA) initial operating segment . Construction of initial operating segment

2

1 Cap‐and‐Trade Programs

Agency/Program Appropriations Potential Projects Identified FY 2014‐15 FY 2015‐16 by Implementing Agencies (Proposed) ($M) ($M)

. Connectivity to existing/future rail systems Transit and Intercity Rail by adding new rail cars/engines . Increase service and reliability of intercity Capital Program $25 $100 and commuter rail systems (CalSTA) . Encourage multi‐modal transit via integrated ticketing/scheduling

. Intermodal affordable housing Affordable Housing and . Transit capital projects Sustainable Communities . Active transportation/complete streets $120 $200 (SGC and member . Transit‐oriented development agencies) . Agricultural land preservation . Local planning and implementation

3

Recommended Cap‐and‐Trade Projects

2 Item 17B Proposed Cap-and-Trade Project Submittals

Recommendation: The Transportation Committee recommends that the Board of Directors: 1) Approve the proposed full application submittals for the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, pending invitation by the Department of Housing and Community Development 2) Approve the proposed project submittals for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

5

3