Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce Transit as a Catalyst for a Winning Region: A Denver Case Study Maria Garcia Berry May 17, 2018 Regionalism is Born 1960s 100-year Flood 1970s School Desegregation and Busing Annexation Wars 1980s Retail Wars Denver International Airport Convention Center 16th Street Mall 2 Regionalism Grows Up 1990s: Formation of Metro Mayors Caucus Sports Facilities T-REX Project - Rail and Roads TABOR – Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights 2000s: Water Wars FasTracks - Expansion of Transit Growth and Development The Great Recession 2010s: Statewide Transportation Challenges Marijuana – The New Mile High City 3 The Early Years of Transit 1960s: Denver Tramway Company files for bankruptcy and transfers assets to city- owned Denver Metro Transit 1969: RTD was created by the Colorado General Assembly 1973: Voters approved .05% sales tax for RTD 1974: Denver Metro Transit becomes part of RTD 1994: Central Connector Light Rail Line opens 2000: Southwest Light Rail Line opens 2002: Central Platte Valley Spur opens 4 Laying the Groundwork for FasTracks • Proposed “Guide the Ride” expansion failed in 1997 (57% to 43%) – Dysfunctional board – Conceptual Plan – “trust us with your money” – The “yes” campaign spent $650,000; “no” $50,000 • In 1999, CDOT and RTD collaborated on two ballot measures approved by the voters – Granted CDOT authority to pledge federal revenues to retire debt – Allowed RTD to seek additional bonding authority for rail construction 3 – TREX expanded I-25 and built 19 miles of light rail Laying the Groundwork for FasTracks • By 2001, RTD Board and local communities began collaborating on a comprehensive, region-wide transit plan called FasTracks • Legislature granted RTD authority to go to ballot, by petition, in May 2002 • Formal review and unanimous approval of plan by DRCOG (Regional MPO) • Two light rail corridors opened in 2000 and 2002 • Southeast Line under construction 4 FasTracks Plan • 122 miles of new light rail and commuter rail • 18 miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) • 57 new transit stations • 31 new Park-n-Rides with over 21,000 new spaces • Enhanced suburb-to- suburb bus service • Development of Denver Union Station 5 Keys to an Effective Campaign • Research, Research, Research! – Between June 2002 and March 2004, privately funded entities conducted 3 baseline polls and 24 focus groups • Throw out all preconceived notions and myths as to who supports transit and who doesn’t • Start Early – Research started shortly after legislature granted RTD the authority to go to an election • Utilize data gathered to assist public policy makers • Be Inclusive and Proactive – Use the issue to bring divergent views but common interests together • Pick the “right” election cycle 6 Things We “Expected” to Learn • Transit riders most likely to support • Higher income households less likely to support • Republicans will never vote to increase taxes for transit • It won’t make a difference in “my lifetime” 7 Key Findings of Research • Voters wanted something done now to address traffic – 12 years was too long • Usage does not equal support • Highways alone would not solve congestion • General awareness of the success of light rail • Voters did NOT know about the FasTracks Plan – needed major education 8 Understanding the Voters • Understand your voting “world” – Develop a “voting model” on how to win in each county – Not all counties are equal – each have different populations and voting patterns • In Denver metro area: – Voters wanted a specific plan/map – Voters wanted choices and options in transportation – Roads alone were not the answer; but roads weren’t the enemy either – one size doesn’t fit all – Voters wanted something done NOW! 9 Challenges Faced by the Campaign • Very competitive election year – Open Senate seat – Presidential election – Campaign budget increased by 15 – 20% – Ballot clutter – Colorado has a very long ballot • Governor and Executive Director of CDOT opposed the campaign • Rocky Mountain News editorialized against the campaign 13 times 10 Key Messages • The Map was key • Translated the cost - 4 pennies on a $10 purchase • The time is now (“Population Explosion”) • Can’t stop growth - must plan for it (“Highways Not the Answer”) • FasTracks provides choices (“New Door to the City”) • Unanimous support of all 32 Mayors in the region 11 Election Results • Final results: YES – 57% NO – 43% • All Republican majority counties voted for FasTracks • One out of three Democratic counties voted against FasTracks 12 The Elements of Success • Created a disciplined, focused, flexible campaign plan – Anticipate changing world of electoral politics – Plan for surprise events • On-time/On-budget delivery – RTD and the region had undertaken large infrastructure projects and delivered them on time and on budget • What it takes – Strength, passion, commitment, courage and unbridled determination to deliver • Great city and region – Need desire and political will to be a great city and region • Vision – Should be lofty, but attainable – Should capture the region’s imagination • A plan 13 – Must have a specific plan What it Takes to Win • Start early • Political will • Business/community/environmental support • Public buy in – research is key • Plan for implementing • Strong public education campaign • Gauge the economy and the impact on voter 14 • Choosing the best election cycle possible RTD Today • Service Area Statistics – Population: 3.03 million – Cities and Towns Serviced: 42 municipalities, 8 counties – Square miles in service area: 2,342 • Ridership – Average weekday boardings: 336,576 – Annual boardings: 100,942,818 • Total Operating Budget – 2017: 626.1 million • Fixed Routes – Commuter Rail: 2 – Light Rail: 8 15 – Bus: 132 FasTracks Progress 2013: W Line opened 2014: Denver Union Station opened MetroRide opened 2016: University of Colorado A Line opened B Line opened Flatiron Flyer opened 2017: R Line opened 2019: G Line and N Line scheduled to open 15 Leveraging Federal Funds • $5.6 billion spent since 2004 election • $1.767 billion in federal funding • Federal funds equal 33.8% of overall budget Project Total Cost Federal % Federal Flatiron Flyer $190 M $0 0% Central Platte Valley $48 M $0 0% West Rail Line $678 M $309 M 44% Central $117 M $0 0% Southwest Corridor $178 M $120 M 80% North Metro $837 M $0 0% Eagle P3 Project $2.3 B $1 B 52% R Line $677 M $0 0% 15 Southeast Corridor $879 M $525 M 60% Southeast Extension $232 M $92 M 43% Private Investment Follows Transit • Nearly $3B in private investment around Union Station since 2009 • 77% of office space build in last decade in the Denver Tech Center along I-25 • 40% of multifamily units proposed or under construction are within ½ miles of rail transit 15 Questions? Maria Garcia Berry CRL Associates, Inc. 1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1800 Denver, CO 80264 303-592-5466 [email protected] 16.
Recommended publications
  • May 2019 Proposed Service Changes
    May 2019 Proposed Service Changes BUS Route 0 – South Broadway Running time analysis resulting in schedule adjustments. Route 1 – 1st Avenue Move east terminal from Birch/Virginia to Virginia/Cherry, immediately behind King Soopers at Leetsdale/Cherry for operator restroom and customer convenience. Route 15 – East Colfax This proposal is an effort to relieve passenger overloads east of Monaco to VA Hospital by adding selected trips between 9:00am and 1:00pm. Move short turn recovery location from Oneida/Colfax to Leyden/Colfax, for operator restroom access. Close to Walgreens, McDonalds, 7-11. Add weekday bus for recovery and on-time performance. 16/16L – West Colfax Running time analyses on weekend services. Route 33 – Platte Valley Due to low ridership performance, it proposed that this route service be discontinued. Current ridership performance stands at 10.3 passenger per hour, which falls below the Urban Local ridership standard. This proposal would impact approximately 55 weekday passengers. Alternative service to the Route 33 can be found in using combinations of Central and West Light Rail corridors, Routes 4, 9, 30 and 30Limited. Route 36L – Fort Logan Limited Running time analysis, for operator recovery and on-time performance. No cost impacts are anticipated. Route 44 – 44th Avenue Reroute eastbound buses via Larimer Street instead of Lawrence, between Broadway and Downing. This change consolidates service onto the historic transit corridor, instead of being split between two streets. Bus stop improvement along northbound Larimer are currently underway in support of this reroute. No cost impacts are anticipated. Route 51 – Sheridan Boulevard This proposal would, formalize the current 4-block route detour in Englewood, which was put into effect due to the City having converted a part of Elati Street into a one-way operation.
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails To
    January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails to Rubber to Rails Again, Part 1: Alabama–Montana Headlights The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. WWW.ERAUSA.ORG Staff Contents Editor and Art Director January–June 2005 Sandy Campbell Associate Editors Raymond R. Berger, Frank S. Miklos, John Pappas Contributors Edward Ridolph, Trevor Logan, Bill Volkmer, Columns Alan K. Weeks 2 News Electric Railroaders’ Compiled by Frank Miklos. International transportation reports. Association, Inc. E Two-Part Cover Story Board of Directors 2008 President 18 Rails to Rubber to Rails Again Frank S. Miklos By Edward Ridolph. An extensive 60-year summary of the street railway industry in First Vice President the U.S. and Canada, starting with its precipitous 30-year, post-World War II decline. William K. Guild It continues with the industry’s rebirth under the banner of “light rail” in the early Second Vice President & Corresponding Secretary 1980s, a renaissance which continues to this day. Raymond R. Berger Third Vice President & Recording Secretary Robert J. Newhouser Below: LAMTA P3 3156 is eastbound across the First Street bridge over the Los Treasurer Angeles River in the waning weeks of service before abandonment of Los Angeles’ Michael Glikin narrow gauge system on March 31, 1963. GERALD SQUIER PHOTO Director Jeffrey Erlitz Membership Secretary Sandy Campbell Officers 2008 Trip & Convention Chairman Jack May Librarian William K. Guild Manager of Publication Sales Raymond R. Berger Overseas Liason Officer James Mattina National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, New York City A-Tower, Room 4A Mailing Address P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENCY PROFILE and FACTS RTD Services at a Glance
    AGENCY PROFILE AND FACTS RTD Services at a Glance Buses & Rail SeniorRide SportsRides Buses and trains connect SeniorRide buses provide Take RTD to a local the metro area and offer an essential service to our sporting event, Eldora an easy RTDway to Denver services senior citizen at community. a glanceMountain Resort, or the International Airport. BolderBoulder. Buses and trains connect and the metro trainsarea and offer an easy way to Denver International Airport. Access-a-Ride Free MallRide Access-a-RideAccess-a-Ride helps meet the Freetravel MallRideneeds of passengers buses with disabilities.Park-n-Rides Access-a-RideFlexRide helps connect the entire length Make connections with meet theFlexRide travel needsbuses travel of within selectof downtown’s RTD service areas.16th Catch FlexRideour to connect buses toand other trains RTD at bus or passengerstrain with servies disabilities. or get direct accessStreet to shopping Mall. malls, schools, and more.89 Park-n-Rides. SeniorRide SeniorRide buses serve our senior community. Free MallRide FlexRideFree MallRide buses stop everyFree block onMetroRide downtown’s 16th Street Mall.Bike-n-Ride FlexRideFree buses MetroRide travel within Free MetroRide buses Bring your bike with you select RTDFree service MetroRide areas. buses offer convenientoffer convenient connections rush-hour for downtown commuterson the bus along and 18th train. and 19th Connectstreets. to other RTD connections for downtown SportsRides buses or trains or get direct commuters along 18th and Take RTD to a local sporting event, Eldora Mountain Resort, or the BolderBoulder. access toPark-n-Rides shopping malls, 19th streets. schools, Makeand more.connections with our buses and trains at more than 89 Park-n-Rides.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th CENTURY COLORADO – TRANSPORTATION Public
    20th CENTURY COLORADO – TRANSPORTATION Public Transportation What do these photos tell you about the different kinds of public transportation 20th century Coloradans used? A 1920’s City Bus This is an Englewood city bus of the 1920s. Englewood city bus Photo: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection More About This Topic Electric streetcars provided public transportation in most Colorado cities during the early 1900s. During the 1920s some cities also added busses. The bus in this photo provided transportation from downtown Englewood to the Fort Logan Military Hospital. Denver Tramway Company Bus This bus provided public transportation in Denver during the 1930s. Denver’s Tramway Company Photo: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection More About This Topic Denver’s Tramway Company used busses during the 1920s in addition to electric streetcars. It ran busses like this one on streets that did not have streetcar lines. This bus was built in 1929 by the White Motor Company. Denver Tramway Company Streetcar This is a Denver Tramway Company trolley or street car. The photo was taken in 1940. Denver Tramway Company trolley Photo: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection More About This Topic It took several years for gasoline powered busses to replace electric streetcars in Denver. Streetcars could carry more passengers more cheaply than early busses. The streetcar in this photo ran between Denver and the town of Golden. A 1930’s City Bus This is a Denver Tramway Company bus. The photo probably was taken during the 1930s. Denver Tramway Company bus Photo: Colorado Historical Society More About This Topic To serve its customers better, the Tramway Company kept adding busses to streets that did not have electric streetcars.
    [Show full text]
  • May 19 2021 BOD Agenda.Pdf
    AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS WEDNESDAY, May 19, 2021 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. VIDEO/WEB CONFERENCE Denver, CO 1. 6:30 Call to Order 2. Roll Call and Introduction of New Members and Alternates 3. Move to Approve Agenda STRATEGIC INFORMATIONAL BRIEIFNG 4. 6:40 The Denver Foundation: summary and overview (Attachment A) Javier Alberto Soto, President & CEO; Dace West, Chief Impact Officer 5. 7:00 Report of the Chair • Public Hearing Announcement • Report on Performance and Engagement Committee • Report on Finance and Budget Committee 6. 7:05 Report of the Executive Director 7. 7:10 Public Comment Up to 45 minutes is allocated now for public comment and each speaker will be limited to 3 minutes. If there are additional requests from the public to address the Board, time will be allocated at the end of the meeting to complete public comment. The chair requests that there be no public comment on issues for which a prior public hearing has been held before this Board. Consent and action items will begin immediately after the last speaker. TIMES LISTED WITH EACH AGENDA ITEM ARE APPROXIMATE. IT IS REQUESTED THAT ALL CELL PHONES BE SILENCED DURING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING. THANK YOU! Persons in need of auxiliary aids or services, such as interpretation services or assisted listening devices, are asked to contact DRCOG at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting by calling (303) 480-6701. Board of Directors Meeting Agenda May 19, 2021 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA 8. 7:20 Move to Approve Consent Agenda i.
    [Show full text]
  • Document.Pdf
    COLORADO LIVING, DINING, WORKING, PLAYING AT ITS FINEST. DEMOGRAPHICS Downtown Superior is unlike any other place along the US 36 corridor south of Boul- der. It really doesn’t get any better than this. After all, it’s Superior. The 157-acre com- 225,069 people currently live within 15 minutes munity at Downtown Superior blends a variety of residential home styles, flexible of Downtown Superior, forecast to grow to 239,628 by 2020. Within a 20 minute working spaces, diverse retail and dining, entertainment in every direction, ample drive the population grows to 523,845, estimated to grow to 557,279 by 2020. open space, and attractive lodging. All of this within a conveniently walkable commu- Downtown Superior is merchandised and actively programmed like no other nity paired with close proximity to RTD transit positions Downtown Superior as the property between Denver and Boulder, and will draw people from the entire 36 premier location in the region. Downtown Superior is a place with palpable energy, a corridor. spirit of success, and a vibrant appeal like no other. SUMMARY: 1 MILE 3 MILE 5 MILE Population* 7,645 43,274 98,462 Average Age 40 38 38 Average Household Income $134,948 $104,323 $118,056 *Over the next 3 years, Downtown Superior itself is forecast to add approximately 2,750 new residents, which are not included in the population numbers above.) 1,400 817,600 EMPLOYMENT: Residential Units SF of Commercial/Retail The 36 Corridor accounts for 191,000 employees, over 10% of the State of Colorado’s employment, and is forecast to
    [Show full text]
  • Fys1617 TDM Application
    FY 2016 and 2017 DRCOG TDM Pool Application Form A. GENERAL INFORMATION Agency Legal Name City of Aurora Address 15151 E Alameda Parkway City/State/Zip Code Aurora, CO 80012 Website www.auroragov.org Identify and provide contact information for: Project manager for proposed activity(ies) Person authorized to enter into contracts Only if different from authorized person (e.g., consultant) Name Kevin Wegener Name Huiliang Liu Title City Engineer Title Principal Transportation Planner Address 15151 E Alameda Parkway, Public Address 15151 E Alameda Parkway Works Department City, State, ZIP Aurora, CO 80012 City, State, ZIP Aurora, CO 80012 Phone 303-739-7300 Phone 303-739-7265 Email [email protected] Email [email protected] 1. Project Title Aurora and East Line Bike-n-Ride Storage Facilities 2. Primary Project Type (select one) Indicate which project type is your primary focus and majority of budget (>50%): Non-infrastructure (marketing, outreach, transit passes, etc.) Infrastructure (permanently installed, vehicles, bicycle parking, etc.) Applicant is committed to have a maintenance pl an in place for the proposed infrastructure. 3. Project Description (concise abstract limited to 500 characters) The City of Aurora and Northeast Transportation Conections (NETC) will jointly develop a secure bike-n-Ride storage system for the soon to be opened East and Aurora Rail lines to encourage alternative modes of travel in Aurora and Northeast Denver. Specifically, secure bike shelters will be installed at Iliff, Peoria and Central Park Stations initially and potentially could be expanded to other stations in the future. A marketing and public outreach component will also be included.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transportation Update: SH119 and SH7 Corridor Studies, Transit Service Delivery Study and Transportation Funding
    CITY OF BOULDER CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: September 26, 2017 AGENDA TITLE: Regional Transportation Update: SH119 and SH7 corridor studies, transit service delivery study and transportation funding PRESENTER/S Jane Brautigam, City Manager Carl Castillo, Policy Advisor, City Manager’s Office Maureen Rait, Executive Director of Public Works Michael Gardner-Sweeney, Director of Public Works for Transportation Kathleen Bracke, GO Boulder Manager, Transportation Jean Sanson, Senior Transportation Planner, GO Boulder Natalie Stiffler, Senior Transportation Planner, GO Boulder EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study session is to provide City Council with an opportunity to discuss regional transportation initiatives, including 1) multimodal corridor planning along East Arapahoe/SH7 and Diagonal Highway/SH119, 2) the city’s Renewed Vision for Transit – Service Delivery Study and 3) current transportation funding opportunities and challenges. This memo also provides background on Boulder’s Regional Travel focus area policies and recent accomplishments. This study session is timely and important due to current regional discussions occurring with the City of Boulder, Boulder County, US36 Mayors and Commissioners Coalition, Commuting Solutions, Northwest Area Chamber Alliance and additional agency partners, including the Regional Transportation District (RTD), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG). Feedback from this study session will be used to inform representation by city officials (both staff and council members) in the various forums that provide opportunities to further the implementation of Boulder’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP). KEY ISSUES IDENTIFIED Key issues related to this regional transportation update include: • Background information regarding Boulder’s TMP “Regional Travel” focus area policies.
    [Show full text]
  • RTD Light Rail Maintenance Work to Temporarily Suspend Service on E
    RTD light rail maintenance work to temporarily suspend service on E and R lines June 26-27 Bus shuttles will be provided; customers should consider alternate stations for travel DENVER (June 23, 2021) – The Regional Transportation District (RTD)’s E and R Line light rail service between Dry Creek and Lincoln stations will be temporarily suspended for routine maintenance on Saturday, June 26 and Sunday, June 27. The E Line will operate between Union Station and Dry Creek Station, and between Lincoln Station and RidgeGate Parkway Station. The R Line will operate between Peoria and Dry Creek Station, but will not operate south of Dry Creek Station. The F Line remains suspended per COVID-19 Service Plan. Regular service on all lines will resume Monday, June 28. RTD will provide bus shuttles at these affected stations: • Dry Creek Station: Board bus shuttle at Gate B • County Line Station: Board bus shuttle at Gate C • Lincoln Station: Board bus shuttle at Gate D Customers should anticipate delays due to the maintenance and are encouraged to explore alternate routes if their trips are impacted by the rail closure. Customers who usually park at RidgeGate Parkway, Lincoln or County Line Park-n-Rides are encouraged to utilize RTD Park-n-Rides at Dry Creek, Arapahoe at Village Center, Orchard or Belleview stations to reduce the likelihood for delays. Customers must wear a mask while riding any RTD vehicle, per federal mandate. The best way to keep up to date on service impacts is to follow the RTD Twitter account at @RideRTD and to sign up for Rider Alerts.
    [Show full text]
  • Flatiron Flyer Fact Sheet
    Flatiron Flyer U.S. 36 Bus Rapid Transit U.S. 36 Bus Rapid Transit at a glance ■ The Flatiron Flyer bus rapid transit (BRT) service is part of RTD’s 2004 voter-approved FasTracks plan to expand transit across the Denver metro region. ■ The line encompasses 18 miles of express and high-frequency bus service between downtown Denver and Boulder, serving Westminster, Broomfield, Superior and Louisville. ■ The line's six stations include U.S. 36Sheridan (formerly U.S. 36Westminster Center); U.S. 36Church Ranch; U.S. 36Broomfield; U.S. 36Flatiron; U.S. 36McCaslin; and U.S. 36Table Mesa. BRT vehicles will continue on to the Downtown Boulder Station and to the Boulder Junction at Depot Square Station from Table Mesa. ■ BRT elements improve travel time, reliability and customer experience. These elements include express lane extensions, queue jumps at highway ramps, enhanced shelters with canopies, ticket-vending machines and large digital monitors with bus arrival information. ■ The Flatiron Flyer BRT offers riders their choice of express and all-station service. Project overview 2001 BRT project began as part of the U.S. 36 Major Investment Study on BRT and commuter rail technologies. 2006-2010 The project's first phase was the first element of the FasTracks program to be completed and included new bus pullouts and a pedestrian bridge at U.S. 36McCaslin; a new Park-n-Ride and bus pullouts at U.S. 36Church Ranch; and a new Park-n-Ride, bus pullouts and pedestrian bridge at U.S. 36Broomfield. 2013-2015 The Colorado Department of Transportation, in partnership with RTD, built the express lanes project.
    [Show full text]
  • Adams County Construct/ Complete and Be Financially Responsible for the Project) 4
    Part 1 Base Information Interstate 270 Corridor Environmental Assessment 1. Project Title 2. Project Start/End points or Interstate 270 from approximately Interstate 25 to Interstate 70. Geographic Area See Attachment 1 and Attachment 1.b for a map of the geographic area. Provide a map with submittal, as appropriate 3. Project Sponsor (entity that will Adams County construct/ complete and be financially responsible for the project) 4. Project Contact Person, Title, Melanie Sloan, Senior Transportation and Mobility Planner, Adams County Phone Number, and Email [email protected], 720.523.6851 Yes No 5. Does this project touch CDOT Right-of-Way, involve a CDOT roadway, access RTD property, or request RTD involvement to operate service? If yes, provide applicable concurrence documentation with submittal DRCOG 2040 Fiscally Constrained Regional Transportation Plan (2040 FCRTP) Local Imagine Adams County Transportation Plan, 2012 6. What planning plan: document(s) identifies this project? North Metropolitan Industrial Area Connectivity Study CDOT 10-Year Development Program Other(s): 2040 Colorado Statewide Transportation Plan Provide link to document/s and referenced page number if possible, or provide documentation with submittal 7. Identify the project’s key elements. Grade Separation Roadway Rapid Transit Capacity (2040 FCRTP) Railway Transit Other: Bicycle Bicycle Facility Pedestrian Pedestrian Facility Roadway Pavement Reconstruction/Rehab Safety Improvements Bridge Replace/Reconstruct/Rehab Roadway Capacity or Managed Lanes (2040 FCRTP)
    [Show full text]
  • Program Management Lessons Learned West Rail Line Project December 2014
    Program Management Lessons Learned West Rail Line Project December 2014 i Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... iv Glossary ...................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Background and Overview ............................................................................................................. 2 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 2 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................ 4 Awards and Recognitions ........................................................................................................... 5 Lesson #1: Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) Contracting Approach ............. 6 Lesson Overview and Background ............................................................................................. 6 The Lessons ................................................................................................................................ 7 Lesson #2: Separation of Civil and Systems Contracts .................................................................. 8 Lesson Overview
    [Show full text]