Avd 08 20 2020 0.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Avd 08 20 2020 0.Pdf The Business Daily of the Global Scheduled Airline Industry Since 1939 August 20, 2020 AIRLINES Incumbent Carriers Gain From China-U.S. Inside: Capacity Boost AIRLINES BRADLEY PERRETT, [email protected] EasyJet Pilot Talks Collapse; Three UK Bases To Close PAGE 3 BEIJING—Incumbent carriers will gain the benefits from an agreement between China and the U.S. to double air service capacity between them. Poland’s Enter Air Places First 737 MAX Order Of 2020 PAGE 5 Routes are also unchanged, according to the U.S. Transportation Department (DOT), which announced the increase in services Aug. 18. Alaska Airlines Sees Q3 Capacity Reaching 50% Of 2019 Level PAGE 7 This rule will disappoint two Chinese carriers, Sichuan Airlines and Hainan Airlines, after having applied to reopen open routes to the U.S. that were closed earlier in the COVID-19 AIRFRAMERS Boeing Seeks More Voluntary pandemic. One of the incumbents, China Southern Airlines, had also hoped to reopen routes. Worker Departures PAGE 4 On Aug. 12, the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) permitted U.S. airlines to increase total services to eight from four per week, the DOT said. In response, the U.S. AIRPORTS Kenya Airport Operator Warns has permitted the same volume for Chinese airlines. It Will Auction Abandoned Aircraft PAGE 4 The two U.S. carriers, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines, currently connecting both countries will double their current services, all of which serve Shanghai, according to TECHNOLOGY Honeywell Marks Additive representatives of the companies in China. Engine Milestone PAGE 6 While no Chinese airline has announced a new schedule, the DOT indicated that the Chinese side of the business would also add no new airlines or routes to the market. CARRIERS, P. 2 The Daily Memo Pandemic Disrupts South Korean Airline Takeover Plans ADRIAN SCHOFIELD, [email protected] The COVID-19 crisis has interrupted an important phase of underway to attempt to save it. mergers and acquisitions in the South Korean airline industry, Eastar Jet was primed to be taken over by fellow South Kore- leaving the future of at least two of the country’s carriers under an LCC Jeju Air, but Jeju backed out of the agreement on July serious threat. 23. This posed a serious headache for Eastar, which appeared The pandemic arrived at a particularly sensitive time for South to have limited survival options. However, two private equity Korea’s airline sector. Tentative agreements had been signed for groups have since expressed interest in investing, according to the takeovers of Asiana Airlines and Eastar Jet, but the indus- Eastar executives cited by the Yonhap News Agency. try was rocked by the novel coronavirus outbreak before the Any new rescue plan for Eastar faces challenging hurdles. purchases could close. Now one of the acquisitions has been Eastar carries substantial debt and owes wages to its staff. The canceled, and the other remains in limbo as last-ditch talks are airline’s operations have been suspended since March, and its DAILY MEMO, P. 2 Software for Hangars, Lines, and Shops Mobile-enabled and in the Cloud [email protected] AWIN.AVIATIONWEEK.COM/AVIATIONDAILY 1 awin.aviationweek.com/aviationdaily August 20, 2020 CARRIERS, From P. 1 “CAAC further informed the department that the four Chinese benefit and under government orders—after foreign carriers, carriers currently providing scheduled passenger service to the including those from the U.S., severed connections with China. United States have likewise qualified to increase their respective Furthermore, much of the demand between China and the U.S. frequency of service from one-time weekly to two-times weekly,” now is from Chinese students abroad wanting to travel home. the DOT said. “Accordingly, the Department’s Order will modify The CAAC issued no statement in response to the U.S. an- the previous decisions made in June to enable those qualified nouncement. Chinese carriers to increase services to the United States, as The four Chinese airlines that currently each fly once weekly China has permitted for U.S. carriers.” between the two countries are Air China (between Beijing and Why more flexibility has not been allowed is not entirely clear. Los Angeles), China Eastern Airlines (Shanghai and New York), But since the Chinese side already has more airlines and more China Southern Airlines (Guangzhou and Los Angeles) and Xia- routes in this traffic, the U.S. side is likely to have demanded men Airlines (Xiamen and Los Angeles). reciprocity in any expansion. Since U.S. airlines sought in May to Delta has been flying once a week to Shanghai from Seattle restore services they had cut at the height of China’s pandem- and once a week from Detroit, both services stopping in Seoul. ic, a theme in commercial aviation relations between the two United has applied both of its weekly flights to the route be- countries has been Chinese restrictiveness and U.S. advocacy of tween San Francisco and Shanghai. All of these services will a return to a free market. double, according to the company representatives. A common view among Chinese airlines is that they are more Sichuan Airlines applied to the CAAC in July to fly once a deserving, because they persevered with minimal, unprofitable week between Los Angeles and Hangzhou with an extension to international services from February to April—for the national CARRIERS, P. 3 DAILY MEMO, From P. 1 air operator’s certificate has now lapsed, meaning it would have sell its 31% stake to resolve its own liquidity issues. to be renewed. The worsening state of the airline industry has complicated Jeju signed an MOU to buy a controlling 51.17% stake in the closing of the deal. HDC and Kumho have been in dispute Eastar in December 2019. At that time, Jeju saw the potential over whether each side has been meeting their obligations under of adding scale to its operation through acquisition. Jeju is the the initial agreement. The prospective purchasers appear to largest of South Korea’s LCCs, and Eastar was the fifth-largest have less appetite for the deal now—at least in its current form. before the pandemic struck. HDC wants to conduct a fresh 12-week due diligence assess- As well as putting Jeju in an even more dominant position, ment of Asiana and has said it wants to renegotiate the terms. the Eastar acquisition would have been an important first step This has caused disagreements with Kumho and Asiana’s larg- towards consolidation of an increasingly crowded LCC market in est creditors, resulting in the deadline for closing the deal being South Korea. In addition to six incumbents, two more LCCs were postponed more than once. approved by the government last year. Kumho and the main creditor—state-backed Korea Develop- However, the new market dynamics created by the COVID-19 ment Bank—have grown frustrated at the delay. Last week the crisis changed the equation for Jeju. Suddenly, expansion does matter came to a head when they issued an ultimatum to the HDC not look so attractive, and taking on more debt even less so. consortium to close the sale. At that point the deal seemed close This is also a factor in an even larger South Korean airline to being canceled. However, the two sides have resumed negotia- acquisition deal that is at risk of falling through. Hyundai Devel- tions in a last-ditch effort to see if they can reach consensus. opment Co. (HDC) is leading a consortium that won the right to The collapse of the takeover would leave limited options for take over Asiana, although there is now a strong possibility that Asiana and its creditors to come up with a new plan to secure HDC will pull out. the airline’s future. There is a smaller pool of investors now An initial agreement was reached in December 2019 after with the ability or appetite to pour money into airlines. Failure to HDC was selected as the successful bidder for Asiana with the secure a deal would also present a dilemma for the government, support of Mirae Asset Daewoo. Asiana had been struggling which wants Asiana to survive to keep two major full-service financially, and its largest shareholder Kumho Industrial had to carriers in the South Korea market. 2 awin.aviationweek.com/aviationdaily August 20, 2020 AIRLINES EasyJet Pilot Talks Collapse; effective Aug. 31. Stansted and Newcastle will continue to be served by Three UK Bases To Close inbound aircraft, maintaining Newcastle-originating flights to VICTORIA MOORES, [email protected] Belfast, Bristol and Nice, as well as Stansted to Amsterdam, LONDON—UK LCC easyJet is to close three UK bases at Lon- Belfast, Edinburgh and Glasgow. The LCC is withdrawing from don Southend, London Stansted and Newcastle after ending Southend completely, leaving easyJet with eight UK bases. redundancy consultations with pilots’ union BALPA, triggering EasyJet CEO Johan Lundgren described the base closures further potential redundancies at airports operator and ground as a “very difficult decision,” triggered by lower demand in light handling provider Stobart Group. of the COVID crisis. Other bases and routes will continue to be On Aug. 17, BALPA said easyJet had “unilaterally” shut down reviewed. redundancy negotiations, which have been underway for sever- The base closures have had a knock-on impact on Southend al weeks. Airport owner and operator Stobart Group, which also supplies “We have put forward tough measures such as part-time and easyJet with check-in and baggage handling at both Southend part-year working, which would have significantly reduced the and Stansted. need for compulsory redundancies. Rather than considering “As a result of the decision to close these airport bases, these proposals, easyJet have walked away,” BALPA general Stobart Aviation Services will enter a consultation process secretary Brian Strutton said.
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus Forces Airlines to Suspend Flights to and from China
    Coronavirus forces airlines to suspend flights to and from China In the meantime almost all airlines have discontinued or at least significantly reduced their connections to and from China. In addition, some airlines have moved their dates from and to which flights are or are not flown forward or backward. Those affected travellers should therefore in any case contact our travel agents for booked or planned trips. Below is the current overview of the affected routes: North America Airline Based in Suspended Dates of suspension Air Canada Canada Flights to Beijing and Shanghai Jan. 30 - Feb. 29 American U.S. All flights to China; and Hong Kong service from Dallas (from Feb. 1 Jan. 31 - Mar. 27 Airlines to Feb. 21) and Los Angeles (Feb. 1 to March 27) Delta U.S. All flights to China Feb. 2 - Apr. 30 United Airlines U.S. Service to Beijing, Shanghai and Chengdu; and Hong Kong service Feb. 5 - Mar. 28 from Feb. 8 until Feb. 20 Asia Airline Based in Suspended Dates of suspension Air India India Flights between Delhi and Shanghai, and between Delhi and Hong Jan. 31 - Feb. 14 Kong (from Feb. 8) Air Seoul South Korea Flights between Incheon and Zhangjiajie and Linyi in China Jan. 28* AirAsia Malaysia All flights to Wuhan and selected flights to mainland China; all Jan. 24 - Feb. 29 flights between the Philippines and mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau (until further notice) All Nippon Japan Flights to nine cities in China, including Beijing, Shanghai and Jan. 23 - Mar. 29 Airways Guangzhou, from Tokyo and Osaka; flights between Osaka and Hong Kong (Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Civil Aviation in the Republic of Korea
    Development of Civil Aviation in the Republic of Korea 14 July 2009 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation Contents I Growth of civil aviation in Korea II Global Status of Korea’s civil aviation III International cooperation in aviation IV Airports of Korea V Boosting int’l cooperation & readying for future 1/21 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation I. Growth of Civil Aviation in Korea 1. Commencement of Air Services in Korea Sept. 1913: First airplane flown in Korea’s airspace Mar. 1916: Airfield construction in Seoul at Yeoeuido Additional airfields built at Pyeongyang, Shineuiju, Ulsan, Hamheung, and Cheongjin in 1929 Dec. 1922: Changnam Ahn becomes the first Korean pilot to fly an aircraft in Korean airspace 1939: Gimpo Airport opens after completion of a runway 1945: US airlines Northwest Orient launches services between Seoul and Tokyo 1946: Northwest Orient launches domestic operations on 4 routes including between Seoul and Busan 2/21 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation I. Growth of Civil Aviation in Korea 2. Birth of Commercial Airlines 1946: Korean National Air (KNA) established with 100% private capital Oct. 1948: Seoul-Busan operations launched Sept. 1948: Northwest Orient begins services on Seattle-Tokyo-Seoul route flying 2 times a week Sept. 1950: Services launched on Busan/Jeju and Busan/Daegu routes Dec. 1953 - Jan. 1954: Test flights begun between Seoul and Hong Kong (72 person capacity DC-4) Dissolved in 1962 due to deficits 3/21 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation I. Growth of Civil Aviation in Korea 3. Birth of Korean Air 1962: Korea Airline Corporation founded as a government-owned public corporation 1968: Hanjin takes over Korean Airline 1971: Changed name to Korean Air 2006: Ranked 16th in int’l passenger transports and 1st in cargo transports World’s top international air cargo carrier from 2004 to 2008 June 2009: Operating to 101 cities/39 countries on 135 routes (124 aircraft) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 08-06-2021 Airline Ticket Matrix (Doc 141)
    Airline Ticket Matrix 1 Supports 1 Supports Supports Supports 1 Supports 1 Supports 2 Accepts IAR IAR IAR ET IAR EMD Airline Name IAR EMD IAR EMD Automated ET ET Cancel Cancel Code Void? Refund? MCOs? Numeric Void? Refund? Refund? Refund? AccesRail 450 9B Y Y N N N N Advanced Air 360 AN N N N N N N Aegean Airlines 390 A3 Y Y Y N N N N Aer Lingus 053 EI Y Y N N N N Aeroflot Russian Airlines 555 SU Y Y Y N N N N Aerolineas Argentinas 044 AR Y Y N N N N N Aeromar 942 VW Y Y N N N N Aeromexico 139 AM Y Y N N N N Africa World Airlines 394 AW N N N N N N Air Algerie 124 AH Y Y N N N N Air Arabia Maroc 452 3O N N N N N N Air Astana 465 KC Y Y Y N N N N Air Austral 760 UU Y Y N N N N Air Baltic 657 BT Y Y Y N N N Air Belgium 142 KF Y Y N N N N Air Botswana Ltd 636 BP Y Y Y N N N Air Burkina 226 2J N N N N N N Air Canada 014 AC Y Y Y Y Y N N Air China Ltd. 999 CA Y Y N N N N Air Choice One 122 3E N N N N N N Air Côte d'Ivoire 483 HF N N N N N N Air Dolomiti 101 EN N N N N N N Air Europa 996 UX Y Y Y N N N Alaska Seaplanes 042 X4 N N N N N N Air France 057 AF Y Y Y N N N Air Greenland 631 GL Y Y Y N N N Air India 098 AI Y Y Y N N N N Air Macau 675 NX Y Y N N N N Air Madagascar 258 MD N N N N N N Air Malta 643 KM Y Y Y N N N Air Mauritius 239 MK Y Y Y N N N Air Moldova 572 9U Y Y Y N N N Air New Zealand 086 NZ Y Y N N N N Air Niugini 656 PX Y Y Y N N N Air North 287 4N Y Y N N N N Air Rarotonga 755 GZ N N N N N N Air Senegal 490 HC N N N N N N Air Serbia 115 JU Y Y Y N N N Air Seychelles 061 HM N N N N N N Air Tahiti 135 VT Y Y N N N N N Air Tahiti Nui 244 TN Y Y Y N N N Air Tanzania 197 TC N N N N N N Air Transat 649 TS Y Y N N N N N Air Vanuatu 218 NF N N N N N N Aircalin 063 SB Y Y N N N N Airlink 749 4Z Y Y Y N N N Alaska Airlines 027 AS Y Y Y N N N Alitalia 055 AZ Y Y Y N N N All Nippon Airways 205 NH Y Y Y N N N N Amaszonas S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Anticipated Merger
    Case number: MAVCOM/ED/CC/DIV4/2021(1) SECTION 55 OF THE MALAYSIAN AVIATION COMMISSION ACT 2015 [ACT 771] ANTICIPATED MERGER Proposed Decision by the Malaysian Aviation Commission on the Voluntary Notification and Application of an Anticipated Merger under Section 55 of the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 by Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc. 23 July 2021 Summary of the Proposed Decision: 1. The Anticipated Merger between Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc. falls within the scope of section 55 of the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 [Act 771]. The Anticipated Merger is a failing firm defence merger, with Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. entering into a share subscription agreement with Asiana Airlines, Inc. on 17 November 2020. Asiana Airlines, Inc. has been in a situation of financial distress for some time and cannot be rehabilitated but for the Anticipated Merger. 2. Upon assessing the notification and by virtue of section 55 of Act 771, the Commission has concluded that the merger, if carried into effect, would not infringe the prohibition in section 54 of Act 771. 2 Contents 1. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................4 The Parties of The Merger ...............................................................................................4 Main Transaction of The Merger ......................................................................................5 Purpose of The Merger ....................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Airports of Thailand Plc. for 6 Months of Fiscal Year 2018 (October 2017 – March 2018)
    Airports of Thailand Plc. For 6 Months of Fiscal Year 2018 (October 2017 – March 2018) Investor Relations Department, E-mail: [email protected], Tel: (662) 535-5900, Fax (662) 535-5909 Disclaimer This presentation is intended to assist investors to better understand the company’s business and financial status. This presentation may contain forward looking statements relate to analysis and other information which are based on forecast of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events which relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies and are not guarantee of future performance. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual result may differ materially from information contained in these statements. 2 Airports in Thailand MAE FAH LUANG-CHIANG RAI Total of 39 airports INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CHIANG MAI INTERNATIONAL Airports of Thailand Public Company Limited AIRPORT ▪ 2 in Bangkok and perimeter Pai Mae Hong Son o Suvarnabhumi Airport (BKK) Nan Lampang o Don Mueang International Airport (DMK) Phrae Udon Thani ▪ 4 international airports at regional sites Sukhothai Nakhon Phanom Tak Loei Mae Sot Sakon Nakhorn o Chiang Mai International Airport (CNX) Phitsanulok Khon Kaen Phetchabun o Phuket International Airport (HKT) Roi Ed DON MUEANG o Hat Yai International Airport (HDY) INTERNATIONAL Surin * AIRPORT Buri Ram Ubon Ratchathani o Mae Fah Luang-Chiang Rai International Airport (CEI)
    [Show full text]
  • Jeju Air (089590 KS ) Fears of Rights Issue Come to Pass
    Jeju Air (089590 KS ) Fears of rights issue come to pass Airlines W170bn rights offering to cause 32% share dilution Company Report Yesterday, Jeju Air announced its decision to issue 12.14mn new shares, representing May 22, 2020 46% of its current shares outstanding. The new shares will be offered to e xisting shareholders (20% to the employee stock ownership association) on a basis of 0.37 th th shares for each share held. The subscription period will run from July 14 to July 15 , and any shares unsubscribed by existing shareholders will be offered to the public. The record date for the rights offering will be June 10th , 2020 , and the new shares will be (Downgrade) Sell listed on August 4, 2020. Target Price (12M, W) 17,000 The offering is expected to raise roughly W170bn, of which W67.8bn will be used on debt repayment and W102.2bn on working capital. The expected offering price is Share Price (05/21/20, W) 19,600 W14,000 per share, but the final price will be determined based on the first reference price (June 5 th ) and the second reference price (July 9 th ). Expected Return -13% More fundraising may be needed by year-end if current conditions continue As of end-1Q20, Jeju Air held cash and cash equivalents of W68bn (W99bn when OP (20F, Wbn) -174 including short-term financial assets). We believe the carrier has reduced its monthly Consensus OP (20F, Wbn) -181 cash outflow from over W50bn to W30-40bn currently by deferring some payments (leases, etc.) and furloughing its employees.
    [Show full text]
  • 356 Partners Found. Check If Available in Your Market
    367 partners found. Check if available in your market. Please always use Quick Check on www.hahnair.com/quickcheck prior to ticketing P4 Air Peace BG Biman Bangladesh Airl… T3 Eastern Airways 7C Jeju Air HR-169 HC Air Senegal NT Binter Canarias MS Egypt Air JQ Jetstar Airways A3 Aegean Airlines JU Air Serbia 0B Blue Air LY EL AL Israel Airlines 3K Jetstar Asia EI Aer Lingus HM Air Seychelles BV Blue Panorama Airlines EK Emirates GK Jetstar Japan AR Aerolineas Argentinas VT Air Tahiti OB Boliviana de Aviación E7 Equaflight BL Jetstar Pacific Airlines VW Aeromar TN Air Tahiti Nui TF Braathens Regional Av… ET Ethiopian Airlines 3J Jubba Airways AM Aeromexico NF Air Vanuatu 1X Branson AirExpress EY Etihad Airways HO Juneyao Airlines AW Africa World Airlines UM Air Zimbabwe SN Brussels Airlines 9F Eurostar RQ Kam Air 8U Afriqiyah Airways SB Aircalin FB Bulgaria Air BR EVA Air KQ Kenya Airways AH Air Algerie TL Airnorth VR Cabo Verde Airlines FN fastjet KE Korean Air 3S Air Antilles AS Alaska Airlines MO Calm Air FJ Fiji Airways KU Kuwait Airways KC Air Astana AZ Alitalia QC Camair-Co AY Finnair B0 La Compagnie UU Air Austral NH All Nippon Airways KR Cambodia Airways FZ flydubai LQ Lanmei Airlines BT Air Baltic Corporation Z8 Amaszonas K6 Cambodia Angkor Air XY flynas QV Lao Airlines KF Air Belgium Z7 Amaszonas Uruguay 9K Cape Air 5F FlyOne LA LATAM Airlines BP Air Botswana IZ Arkia Israel Airlines BW Caribbean Airlines FA FlySafair JJ LATAM Airlines Brasil 2J Air Burkina OZ Asiana Airlines KA Cathay Dragon GA Garuda Indonesia XL LATAM Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • IATA Comments on Draft Bill 19331 on Aircraft History Management
    IATA Comments on Draft Bill 19331 on Aircraft History Management The International Air Transport Association (IATA) is a global trade association for airlines representing some 290 airline members and accounting for 82% of total global air traffic. Our members include Asiana Airlines, Eastar Jet, Jeju Air, Jin Air, Korean Air, T’way Air and major foreign airlines that operate services to/from the Republic of Korea. IATA understands that the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea is currently seeking public opinion on a draft bill on the management of aircraft history by airlines. Due to the time constraint, IATA was unable to consult our member airlines extensively on the proposed bill. However, IATA would like to submit the below comments to the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea for your kind consideration. Ensuring that air travel remains a safe, secure and efficient mode of transport is a common objective for governments, aircraft operators and passengers. In this regard, IATA recognizes the importance of aviation safety and it is a top priority for both IATA and our member airlines. However, IATA is of the opinion that the requirement for airlines to publish aircraft history is unlikely to contribute positively to the enhancement of aviation safety. Given the likely limited benefits of these requirements, the compliance burden on airlines would increase disproportionately, particularly as requirements such as the provision of aircraft history for pre-owned aircraft would be difficult to comply with. More importantly, the requirements could bring about unintended consequences, by giving an impression that there is a direct correlation between the age of an aircraft and safety, which is incorrect and unjustified.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivalry Between Low Cost Carriers and Major Carriers: the Case in Korean Aviation Industry*
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS AND TRADE 99 Volume 7, Number 2, December 2009, pp. 99~128 Rivalry between low cost carriers and major carriers: the case in Korean aviation industry* Jin-Kook Lee**and Tae Seung Kim*** Abstract As the wave of liberalization and deregulation have accelerated to relieve rigid controls over airline routes, capacity, and fare setting regimes, Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) have emerged especially in local aviation markets since the 1970s. This paper has studied the effects of LCC's entry into the domestic aviation market which was pre-occupied by two major carriers, Korean Air (KAL) and Asiana Airlines. Through a simple model describing two situations, prior and post to LCC's entry, we analyzed changes and trends of each airline's output and profit based on the Cournot and two-stage Stackelberg game equilibrium. In summary, our conclusion consists of five points: (1) Even though JIN Air's entry reduced KAL's respective output and profit, the more JIN Air produces, the higher the joint-profit of KAL and JIN Air is, (2) From the joint-profit aspect, increasing KAL's output to a level than JIN Air's is more profitable on the Gimpo-Jeju route, on the other hand, increasing JIN Air's output higher than KAL's is more profitable on the Jeju-Busan route, (3) Even though JIN Air's entry increase Asiana Airline's output, the more JIN Air produces, the less Asiana Airlines's profit is, (4) Total output in markets as well as total profits of firms will increase under certain conditions, (5) KAL and JIN Air tend to get caught in an unresolved conflict on level of LCC cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Daily Focus
    December 19, 2019 Korea Daily Focus Company News & Analysis Jeju Air (089590/Buy/TP: W36,000) Raise TP Killing three birds with one highly efficient investment This document is a summary of a report prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. (“Mirae Asset Daewoo”) and published on our website. Please review the compliance notices contained in the original report. Information and opinions contained herein have been compiled in good faith from sources deemed to be reliable. However, the information has not been independently verified. Mirae Asset Daewoo makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Mirae Asset Daewoo accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any loss arising from the use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. Information and opinions contained herein are subject to change without notice. This document is for informational purposes only. It is not and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This document may not be reproduced, further distributed or published in whole or in part for any purpose. Jeju Air (089590 KS ) Killing three birds with one highly efficient investment Airlines Jeju Air announces acquisition of Eastar Jet Company Report On December 18 th , Jeju Air announced that it had signed a memorandum of December 19, 2019 understanding to acquire a 51.17% stake in Eastar Jet for W69.5bn (subject to change after due diligence).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Airport Ownership and Management and the Ground Handling Market in Selected Non-European Union (EU) Countries
    Study on airport DG MOVE, European ownership and Commission management and the ground handling market in selected non-EU countries Final Report Our ref: 22907301 June 2016 Client ref: MOVE/E1/SER/2015- 247-3 Study on airport DG MOVE, European ownership and Commission management and the ground handling market in selected non-EU countries Final Report Our ref: 22907301 June 2016 Client ref: MOVE/E1/SER/2015- 247-3 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave DG MOVE, European Commission 28-32 Upper Ground DM 28 - 0/110 London SE1 9PD Avenue de Bourget, 1 B-1049 Brussels (Evere) Belgium +44 20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for DG MOVE, European Commission. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission.
    [Show full text]