DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Facts Behind the World's 20 Busiest Routes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

busiest routes Key facts behind the world’s 20 busiest routes Based on frequency in the 12 months to February 2018 Source: analyser © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved Key facts behind the world’s busiest routes 20 busiest routes Frequency Rank Route (Mar17-Feb18) About OAG busiest routes 1 KUL-SIN 30,537 OAG takes a closer look at the Top 20 busiest international routes by frequency in the 12 months to 2 HKG-TPE 28,887 February 2018. 3 CGK-SIN 27,304 These are the world’s busiest trunk routes in terms of the volume of flights that operate on them. Unsurprisingly 4 HKG-PVG 21,888 the biggest of these routes operate in Asia, with 14 of the Top 20 operating to and from destinations in Asia. 5 CGK-KUL 19,849 Two operate within Europe, another two operate within North America, and one between North America and 6 ICN-KIX 17,488 Europe. There is also one route which operates between two destinations in the Middle East. 7 HKG-ICN 17,075 Using key reports and power tables from OAG Analyser we take a deeper look at these busiest routes, their 8 LGA-YYZ 16,956 profiles in terms of size, carriers which operate them, whether they are growing, to what extent they operate on time and what aircraft typically operate on the route. We also take a look at how passengers use these routes 9 DXB-KWI 15,332 to connect onwards to and from other places. 10 HKG-SIN 15,029 11 BKK-SIN 14,859 Top 20 Routes decoded 12 BKK-HKG 14,832 13 HKG-PEK 14,543 • Data from Schedules Analyser is for the 12 • Frequencies and seats are calculated using jet 14 DUB-LHR 14,390 months to February 2018 and all data covers aircraft frequencies only. both directions of each route. 15 KIX-TPE 14,186 • All routes are international. 16 JFK-LHR 13,888 • Carriers shown to be operating the route are • OTP data is sourced from OAG’s Flight Status those with traffic rights to serve the route. 17 KIX-PVG 13,576 database and is for the 12 months to February • Passenger load factor is calculated by dividing 2018. Where average coverage falls below OAG’s 18 ICN-NRT 13,517 bookings for each route by seats and represents 80% threshold, a route or carrier’s entry has been 19 AMS-LHR 13,170 an estimated bookings load factor which doesn’t recorded as ‘not available (N/A)’. take non-revenue passengers into account. Data 20 ORD-YYZ 13,100 • Connecting bookings data at origin and for this figure is based (for seats and bookings) on destination airports includes bridge, behind and Based on frequency in the 12 months to February 2018 the period January-December 2017. beyond data. © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved KUL–SIN Route profile 1 Kuala Lumpur – Singapore Carriers on route 7 Seats 5,365,761 Capacity (time period Mar–Feb) Passengers carried 4,004,448 10,000 Passenger load factor 75% 7,500 Flights 30,537 KUL Average Seats/Aircraft 177 5,000 Average stage length (km) 296 Seats (000’s) 2,500 Average flight time (hh:mm) 01:04 0 SIN Mainline/LCC % split 57:43 2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-18 OTP (all carriers) 72.6% 2017 seat growth 0% Carriers 5 year AAGR 2% Equipment used on the route Largest airline AK 2017–18 Capacity share of largest airline 25% 2% 2% 5% Fastest growing airline MI 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 Airbus A318/319/320/321 Air Asia Malaysia Airlines SilkAir Jetstar Growth of fastest growing airline 3% Boeing 737 Singapore Airlines Malindo Airways Scoot Airbus A330 Airbus A350 Top 5 connecting flows – each way 40% 51% Boeing 787 BKI Connections at KUL Connections at SIN BNE Connecting share at destination Local share at destination LGK CRK 37% 37% OTP KCH SYD Airlines 63% 63% BEST MONTH MOST PUNCTUAL TR March 82.1% Scoot 88.9% DEL MEL LEAST PUNCTUAL WORST MONTH MH 58,520 45,211 39,542 35,993 33,747 Malaysia 37,996 29,961 20,081 18,914 18,579 66.1% 61.4% TRZ PER December Airlines BKI LGK KCH DEL TRZ BNE CRK SYD MEL PER Source: analyser © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved HKG–TPE Route profile 2 Hong Kong – Taipei Carriers on route 5 Seats 8,165,983 Capacity (time period Mar–Feb) Passengers carried 6,543,935 10,000 Passenger load factor 80% 7,500 Flights 28,887 TPE Average Seats/Aircraft 282 5,000 Average stage length (km) 805 Seats (000’s) 2,500 Average flight time (hh:mm) 01:47 0 HKG Mainline/LCC % split 100:0 2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-18 OTP (all carriers) 68% 2017 seat growth 0% Carriers 5 year AAGR -3% Equipment used on the route Largest airline CX 2017–18 Capacity share of largest airline 45% 3% 0% 5% Fastest growing airline BR 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 Airbus A330 Cathay Pacific Airways China Airlines EVA Airways Growth of fastest growing airline 3% 8% Boeing 777 Hong Kong Airways Cathay Dragon Airbus A318/319/320/321 47% Airbus A350 17% Top 5 connecting flows – each way Boeing 737 Boeing 747 PEK Connections at HKG Connections at TPE LAX 20% Airbus A340 Connecting share at destination Local share at destination PVG JFK 21% 20% OTP BKK SFO Airlines 79% 80% BEST MONTH MOST PUNCTUAL HX March 75.9% Hong Kong Airlines 90.9% LHR YVR WORST MONTH LEAST PUNCTUAL BR 74,576 47,790 41,211 37,786 28,818 23,807 22,180 18,200 12,640 10,618 July 55.2% EVA Airways 52.6% SIN YYZ PEK PVG BKK LHR SIN LAX JFK SFO YVR YYZ Source: analyser © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved CGK–SIN Route profile 3 Jakarta – Singapore Carriers on route 7 Seats 5,647,531 Capacity (time period Mar–Feb) Passengers carried 4,661,887 7,500 Passenger load factor 83% Flights 27,304 SIN 5,000 Average Seats/Aircraft 207 Average stage length (km) 880 Seats (000’s) 2,500 Average flight time (hh:mm) 01:48 0 Mainline/LCC % split 58:42 2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-18 OTP (all carriers) 75% CGK 2017 seat growth -1% Carriers 5 year AAGR 0% Equipment used on the route Largest airline SQ 0% 2017–18 Capacity share of largest airline 31% 3% Fastest growing airline ID 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Airbus A318/319/320/321 8% Singapore Airlines Garuda Indonesia Lion Air Jetstar Asia Growth of fastest growing airline 21% Boeing 737 Indonesia AirAsia Scoot Batik Air Boeing 777 37% 18% Airbus A330 Top 5 connecting flows – each way Airbus A350 Airbus Industrie A330 SOC Connections at CGK Connections at SIN HKG 34% Connecting share at destination Local share at destination UPG BKK 28% 27% OTP BPN MNL Airlines 72% 73% BEST MONTH MOST PUNCTUAL ID March 83.2% Batik Air 89.1% SRG KIX WORST MONTH LEAST PUNCTUAL QZ 63,482 39,847 39,252 28,371 28,169 78,595 42,286 40,371 28,754 27,357 December 59.2% Indonesia AirAsia 58.7% SUB BOM SOC UPG BPN SRG SUB HKG BKK MNL KIX BOM Source: analyser © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved HKG–PVG Route profile 4 Hong Kong – Shanghai Pudong Carriers on route 7 Seats 4,946,393 Capacity (time period Mar–Feb) Passengers carried 3,842,114 7,500 Passenger load factor 78% PVG Flights 21,888 5,000 Average Seats/Aircraft 226 Average stage length (km) 1,255 Seats (000’s) 2,500 Average flight time (hh:mm) 02:30 0 Mainline/LCC % split 95:5 2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-18 OTP (all carriers) 55% 2017 seat growth 3% HKG Carriers 5 year AAGR 2% Equipment used on the route Largest airline KA 0% 0% 2017–18 Capacity share of largest airline 42% 2% Fastest growing airline MU 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Airbus A318/319/320/321 Cathay Dragon China Eastern Airlines Hong Kong Airlines Growth of fastest growing airline 6% Airbus A330 Cathay Pacific Spring Airlines Juneyao Airlines Shanghai Airlines Boeing 777 55% Boeing 737 43% Top 5 connecting flows – each way Airbus A340 BKK Connections at HKG Connections at PVG SHE Connecting share at destination Local share at destination SIN CGQ 33% 33% OTP TPE LAX Airlines 67% 67% BEST MONTH MOST PUNCTUAL HX December 68.5% Hong Kong Airlines 91.0% KUL HRB LEAST PUNCTUAL WORST MONTH BR 78,829 50,311 47,864 38,664 34,432 China Eastern 17,678 15,297 13,212 11,098 10,326 37.9% 40.6% BOM DLC July Airlines BKK SIN TPE KUL BOM SHE CGQ LAX HRB DLC Source: analyser © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved CGK–KUL Route profile 5 Jakarta – Kuala Lumpur Carriers on route 9 Seats 3,488,681 Capacity (time period Mar–Feb) Passengers carried 2,709,576 5,000 Passenger load factor 78% KUL Flights 19,849 Average Seats/Aircraft 180 2,500 Average stage length (km) 1,127 Seats (000’s) Average flight time (hh:mm) 02:04 0 Mainline/LCC % split 53:47 2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-18 OTP (all carriers) 60% 2017 seat growth 17% CGK Carriers 5 year AAGR 4% Equipment used on the route Largest airline MH 2017–18 Capacity share of largest airline 23% 4% 0% 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Fastest growing airline ID Boeing 737 Malaysia Airlines AirAsia Lion Air Indonesia AirAsia Malindo Airways Garuda Indonesia Growth of fastest growing airline >100% Airbus A318/319/320/321 KLM-Royal Dutch Airlines Batik Air Indonesia AirAsia X Boeing 777 36% Airbus A330 Top 5 connecting flows – each way 60% MDC Connections at CGK Connections at KUL BKI Connecting share at destination Local share at destination SOC HKG 34% 34% OTP UPG PEN Airlines 66% 66% MOST PUNCTUAL KL BEST MONTH KLM-Royal Dutch 69.3% 83.6% June Airlines SUB DAC WORST MONTH LEAST PUNCTUAL XT 49,459 47,489 32,134 29,149 19,666 42,498 40,276 40,069 23,179 21,290 December 51.4% Indonesia Airasia X 29.3% PLM DEL MDC SOC UPG SUB PLM BKI HKG PEN DAC DEL Source: analyser © 2018 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data Page 0

    2021 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data Page 0

    2021 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data Page 0 2021 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data by IdeaWorksCompany Table of Contents Updates to the 2021 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data .................................................................................... 3 A. Welcome Message from Datalex .................................................................................................................. 5 B. Introduction to the Data ................................................................................................................................. 6 About Special Reporting Periods ....................................................................................................................... 7 Year over Year Comparisons are Introduced this Year............................................................................... 8 2020 Was Bad – But There Were a Few Bright Spots ................................................................................. 9 C. Airline Traffic for the 2020 Period .............................................................................................................. 12 Primary Airlines in Alphabetical Order .......................................................................................................... 12 Subsidiary Airlines in Alphabetical Order ...................................................................................................... 18 Primary Airlines by Traffic ................................................................................................................................
  • Coronavirus Forces Airlines to Suspend Flights to and from China

    Coronavirus Forces Airlines to Suspend Flights to and from China

    Coronavirus forces airlines to suspend flights to and from China In the meantime almost all airlines have discontinued or at least significantly reduced their connections to and from China. In addition, some airlines have moved their dates from and to which flights are or are not flown forward or backward. Those affected travellers should therefore in any case contact our travel agents for booked or planned trips. Below is the current overview of the affected routes: North America Airline Based in Suspended Dates of suspension Air Canada Canada Flights to Beijing and Shanghai Jan. 30 - Feb. 29 American U.S. All flights to China; and Hong Kong service from Dallas (from Feb. 1 Jan. 31 - Mar. 27 Airlines to Feb. 21) and Los Angeles (Feb. 1 to March 27) Delta U.S. All flights to China Feb. 2 - Apr. 30 United Airlines U.S. Service to Beijing, Shanghai and Chengdu; and Hong Kong service Feb. 5 - Mar. 28 from Feb. 8 until Feb. 20 Asia Airline Based in Suspended Dates of suspension Air India India Flights between Delhi and Shanghai, and between Delhi and Hong Jan. 31 - Feb. 14 Kong (from Feb. 8) Air Seoul South Korea Flights between Incheon and Zhangjiajie and Linyi in China Jan. 28* AirAsia Malaysia All flights to Wuhan and selected flights to mainland China; all Jan. 24 - Feb. 29 flights between the Philippines and mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau (until further notice) All Nippon Japan Flights to nine cities in China, including Beijing, Shanghai and Jan. 23 - Mar. 29 Airways Guangzhou, from Tokyo and Osaka; flights between Osaka and Hong Kong (Feb.
  • Develop Air Connectivity in the APEC Region 1

    Develop Air Connectivity in the APEC Region 1

    APEC Project TWG 01 2014A – Develop Air Connectivity in the APEC Region 1 APEC Project: TWG 01 2014A Produced by International Air Transport Association Head Office Canada: 800 Place Victoria, PO Box 113 Montreal H4Z 1M1, Quebec, Canada www.iata.org/consulting For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2016 APEC Secretariat APEC#216-TO-01.20 APEC Project TWG 01 2014A – Develop Air Connectivity in the APEC Region 2 Table of Contents Glossary…………………. .................................................................................................................................... 5 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction to the project ......................................................................................................... 10 2. Approach followed and data used .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Data fueling the model ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Gap analysis ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Induction ....................................................................................................................................
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable

    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
  • Dual-Hub Connectivity: a Case Study on China Eastern Airlines in Shanghai Huijuan Yang* and Weiwei Liu

    Dual-Hub Connectivity: a Case Study on China Eastern Airlines in Shanghai Huijuan Yang* and Weiwei Liu

    Yang and Liu European Transport Research Review (2019) 11:25 European Transport https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0364-6 Research Review ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Dual-hub connectivity: a case study on China Eastern Airlines in Shanghai Huijuan Yang* and Weiwei Liu Abstract To deal with slot constraints and insufficient capacity, emerging multi-airport systems have been under construction in China. This paper chose China Eastern Airlines as a case study, evaluating its hub connectivity under a dual-hub circumstance in Shanghai. The paper detected that the biggest constraint of China Eastern Airlines’ dual-hub situation lied in Shanghai’s location and the restricted transfer options on international routes. Contributions from alliance partners were assessed and benchmarked with China Eastern Airlines. With China Southern Airlines quit SkyTeam alliance, China Eastern Airlines faced more challenges on the domestic market. The empirical study also pointed out the shortcoming of operating at two hubs in the same catchment area, where the quality of connectivity of inter-hub connections cannot be maintained as high as a single-hub transfer. However, the market potential of inter-hub connections in Shanghai was identified with a considerable amount of viable connections. Keywords: Hub connectivity, Dual-hub operation, China Eastern Airlines 1 Introduction Multi-airport system largely expands the catchment area Airports have experienced pressures on operational cap- and capacity in the region. It provides better accessibility acity and congestion due to the worldwide effects of explo- for passengers, and attracts and generates more traffic for sive passenger growth, particularly in high-growth regions airlines and airports.
  • Development of Civil Aviation in the Republic of Korea

    Development of Civil Aviation in the Republic of Korea

    Development of Civil Aviation in the Republic of Korea 14 July 2009 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation Contents I Growth of civil aviation in Korea II Global Status of Korea’s civil aviation III International cooperation in aviation IV Airports of Korea V Boosting int’l cooperation & readying for future 1/21 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation I. Growth of Civil Aviation in Korea 1. Commencement of Air Services in Korea Sept. 1913: First airplane flown in Korea’s airspace Mar. 1916: Airfield construction in Seoul at Yeoeuido Additional airfields built at Pyeongyang, Shineuiju, Ulsan, Hamheung, and Cheongjin in 1929 Dec. 1922: Changnam Ahn becomes the first Korean pilot to fly an aircraft in Korean airspace 1939: Gimpo Airport opens after completion of a runway 1945: US airlines Northwest Orient launches services between Seoul and Tokyo 1946: Northwest Orient launches domestic operations on 4 routes including between Seoul and Busan 2/21 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation I. Growth of Civil Aviation in Korea 2. Birth of Commercial Airlines 1946: Korean National Air (KNA) established with 100% private capital Oct. 1948: Seoul-Busan operations launched Sept. 1948: Northwest Orient begins services on Seattle-Tokyo-Seoul route flying 2 times a week Sept. 1950: Services launched on Busan/Jeju and Busan/Daegu routes Dec. 1953 - Jan. 1954: Test flights begun between Seoul and Hong Kong (72 person capacity DC-4) Dissolved in 1962 due to deficits 3/21 Development of Korea’s Civil Aviation I. Growth of Civil Aviation in Korea 3. Birth of Korean Air 1962: Korea Airline Corporation founded as a government-owned public corporation 1968: Hanjin takes over Korean Airline 1971: Changed name to Korean Air 2006: Ranked 16th in int’l passenger transports and 1st in cargo transports World’s top international air cargo carrier from 2004 to 2008 June 2009: Operating to 101 cities/39 countries on 135 routes (124 aircraft) 4.
  • A Famous Chinese Brand and Fleets

    A Famous Chinese Brand and Fleets

    ASCEND I PROFILE y most accounts, the first double-digit passenger traffic growth from decade of the 21st century 2004 through 2010, according to the Civil presented unprecedented chal- Aviation Administration of China (CAAC). While lenges for the global airline that growth has slowed during the last two industry worldwide. In fact, years, it is still the highest in the world. Total manyB industry analysts have labeled the first profits for China’s airline industry in 2011 alone 10 years of this century as the “lost decade,” are an estimated US$7.2 billion, accounting citing: for more than half the profits of the entire Massive layoffs, worldwide airline industry. Staggering financial losses, Leading the way are China’s “big three” Record numbers of bankruptcies and con- carriers — Air China, China Southern Airlines solidations, and China Eastern Airlines, followed by a Skyrocketing fuel prices, strengthening number of second-tier carriers. Declining consumer confidence, While expansion has been a major focus Widespread service disruptions attributed to of China’s aviation industry during the first pandemics, volcanic ash and wild weather decade, flexibility — the ability to adapt quickly patterns. to the volatile marketplace — continues to be Along with the challenges, the decade also a priority. brought myriad opportunities for the industry. China Eastern was the first Chinese civil The tragic events of Sept. 11, 2001, in the aviation company to be listed simultaneously United States, it appears, were the first of on the Hong Kong, New York and Shanghai many catalysts that drove airlines worldwide stock exchanges. It has carefully and success- to evaluate and fundamentally restructure the fully navigated the industry’s last few turbulent way they do business.
  • Consultation on the Application of an Anticipated Merger Between Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana

    Consultation on the Application of an Anticipated Merger Between Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana

    Anticipated Merger between Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc. Reference Number : MAVCOM/ED/CC/DIV4/2021(1) Application : Voluntary Notification and Application for an Anticipated Merger under section 55 of Act 771 Applicant(s) : Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc. Receipt of Application : 19 March 2021 Summary of Application : Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. (“KE”), on behalf of KE and Asiana Airlines, Inc. (“OZ”) (collectively, “the Merger Parties”), sent a voluntary notification and application for an anticipated merger (“Anticipated Merger”). The purpose of the Anticipated Merger is for the rehabilitation of OZ. The Merger Parties note that KE’s merger with OZ would not result in substantial lessening of competition (“SLC”) as KE will continue to face intense competition and will remain subject to competitive restraints on its flights to and from Malaysia. The Merger Parties also note that the Anticipated Merger is expected to give rise to significant economic efficiencies. The Merger Parties submit that the relevant service markets in this case are the following origin and destination (“O&D”) city pair routes relating to passenger air transport services: a. Incheon International Airport (“ICN”) and Gimpo International Airport (“GMP”, collectively with ICN, “SEL”)-Kuala Lumpur International Airport (“KLIA”) and Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport (“SZB”, collectively with KLIA, “KUL”); b. SEL-Kota Kinabalu International Airport (“BKI”); c. SEL-Senai International Airport (“JHB”); and d. Busan (“PUS”)-BKI. Of the O&D city pair routes above, the Merger Parties have identified only one overlap in their passenger transport services namely on the SEL-BKI O&D pair route.
  • A Chronological History

    A Chronological History

    A Chronological History December 2016 Pedro Heilbron, CEO of Copa Airlines, elected as new Chairman of the Star Alliance Chief Executive Board November 2016 Star Alliance Gold Track launched in Frankfurt, Star Alliance’s busiest hub October 2016 Juneyao Airlines announced as future Connecting Partner of Star Allianceseal partnership August 2016 Star Alliance adds themed itineraries to its Round the World product portfolio July 2016 Star Alliance Los Angeles lounge wins Skytrax Award for second year running Star Alliance takes ‘Best Alliance’ title at Skytrax World Airline Awards June 2016 New self-service check-in processes launched in Tokyo-Narita Star Alliance announces Jeffrey Goh will take over as Star Alliance CEO from 2017, on the retirement of Mark Schwab Swiss hosts Star Alliance Chief Executive Board meeting in Zurich. The CEOs arrive on the first passenger flight of the Bombardier C Series. Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 April 2016 Star Alliance: Global travel solutions for conventions and meetings at IMEX March 2016 Star Alliance invites lounge guests to share tips via #irecommend February 2016 Star Alliance airlines launch new check-in processes at Los Angeles’ Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) Star Alliance Gold Card holders enjoy free upgrades on Heathrow Express trains Star Alliance supports Ramsar’s Youth Photo Contest – Alliance’s Biosphere Connections initiative now in its ninth year January 2016 Gold Track priority at security added as a Star Alliance Gold Status benefit December 2015 Star Alliance launches Connecting
  • Monthly OTP July 2019

    Monthly OTP July 2019

    Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This July result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size SATA International-Azores GA Garuda Indonesia 93.9% 1 13,798 52 S4 30.8% 160 833 253 Airlines S.A. XL LATAM Airlines Ecuador 92.0% 2 954 246 ZI Aigle Azur 47.8% 159 1,431 215 HD AirDo 90.2% 3 1,806 200 OA Olympic Air 50.6% 158 7,338 92 3K Jetstar Asia 90.0% 4 2,514 168 JU Air Serbia 51.6% 157 3,302 152 CM Copa Airlines 90.0% 5 10,869 66 SP SATA Air Acores 51.8% 156 1,876 196 7G Star Flyer 89.8% 6 1,987 193 A3 Aegean Airlines 52.1% 155 5,446 114 BC Skymark Airlines 88.9% 7 4,917 122 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc.
  • Anticipated Merger

    Anticipated Merger

    Case number: MAVCOM/ED/CC/DIV4/2021(1) SECTION 55 OF THE MALAYSIAN AVIATION COMMISSION ACT 2015 [ACT 771] ANTICIPATED MERGER Proposed Decision by the Malaysian Aviation Commission on the Voluntary Notification and Application of an Anticipated Merger under Section 55 of the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 by Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc. 23 July 2021 Summary of the Proposed Decision: 1. The Anticipated Merger between Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc. falls within the scope of section 55 of the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 [Act 771]. The Anticipated Merger is a failing firm defence merger, with Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. entering into a share subscription agreement with Asiana Airlines, Inc. on 17 November 2020. Asiana Airlines, Inc. has been in a situation of financial distress for some time and cannot be rehabilitated but for the Anticipated Merger. 2. Upon assessing the notification and by virtue of section 55 of Act 771, the Commission has concluded that the merger, if carried into effect, would not infringe the prohibition in section 54 of Act 771. 2 Contents 1. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................4 The Parties of The Merger ...............................................................................................4 Main Transaction of The Merger ......................................................................................5 Purpose of The Merger ....................................................................................................6
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal

    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.